Action accessibility in the variety of skew braces

Andrea Albano; Paola Stefanelli

arxiv: 2605.30097 · v1 · pith:NJ4U3B4Enew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 🧮 math.CT · math.RA

Action accessibility in the variety of skew braces

Andrea Albano , Paola Stefanelli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 23:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CT math.RA

keywords skew bracesaction accessibilityHuq centraliserpost-Lie algebrassplit extensionsYang-Baxter equation

0 comments

The pith

The variety of skew braces is not action accessible.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that skew braces do not form an action accessible variety. This follows from showing that the Huq centraliser condition fails to hold in the category. The negative result directly implies that split extension classifiers cannot exist for skew braces. The same failure of action accessibility is shown for the variety of post-Lie algebras over any fixed field.

Core claim

The variety of skew braces is not action accessible, established by verifying that the Huq centraliser does not satisfy the necessary condition in this variety; an identical conclusion holds for post-Lie algebras.

What carries the argument

The Huq centraliser, the categorical notion whose failure demonstrates the absence of action accessibility.

If this is right

Split extension classifiers do not exist in the category of skew braces.
Split extension classifiers do not exist in the category of post-Lie algebras over a fixed field.
Questions about the existence of such classifiers, raised in the context of the Yang-Baxter equation, receive a negative answer.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Categorical methods relying on action accessibility may require modification when applied to structures tied to the Yang-Baxter equation.
The Huq centraliser test could be checked in other varieties related to braid group representations to identify similar failures.

Load-bearing premise

Failure of the Huq centraliser condition is sufficient to conclude that the variety is not action accessible.

What would settle it

An explicit construction of a split extension classifier in the category of skew braces, or a proof that the Huq centraliser condition holds throughout the variety, would disprove the result.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we answer negatively to a question posed in the context of the 2025 Oberwolfach Mini-Workshop ``The Yang-Baxter Equation and Representations of Braid Groups'' regarding the existence of split extensions classifiers in the category of skew braces. To this end, we show that the variety of skew braces is not action accessible by investigating the categorical notion of centraliser in the sense of Huq. In light of their intrinsic relationship with skew braces, an analogous result is proven for the variety of post-Lie algebras over a fixed field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a negative answer to the Oberwolfach question on split extension classifiers for skew braces by showing the variety fails action accessibility via Huq centralisers, with the same holding for post-Lie algebras.

read the letter

The paper settles the open question from the 2025 Oberwolfach Mini-Workshop by proving that the variety of skew braces is not action accessible. It reaches this via the Huq centraliser and records the same negative outcome for post-Lie algebras over a field.

What is new is the direct negative resolution of that specific question, which the abstract indicates was unsettled in the cited prior work. The paper does a straightforward job of applying the categorical notion to these two varieties and stating the consequence for classifiers.

The soft spot is the precise link between the computed Huq centraliser behaviour and the absence of action accessibility. The abstract presents the result as following from the investigation of the centraliser, so the argument stands or falls on whether that implication is already established in the literature on semi-abelian or Mal'cev varieties or whether the paper supplies a short self-contained step. If the former, the claim is fine; if the latter is missing, a referee might ask for one extra sentence or reference.

The rest of the setup looks standard: the citation pattern points to the workshop question and relevant categorical machinery, and no circularity or free parameters appear. The result is narrow but cleanly targeted.

This is for readers already working on action accessibility, split extensions, or the algebraic structures around skew braces and post-Lie algebras. Someone tracking the Oberwolfach discussion or the Huq centraliser literature would get immediate value from the negative answer.

It deserves a serious referee because it resolves an explicit open question with a concrete categorical argument, even though the scope stays inside that intersection.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the variety of skew braces is not action accessible, shown by investigating the categorical notion of the Huq centraliser; this answers negatively a question from the 2025 Oberwolfach Mini-Workshop on the existence of split extension classifiers in the category of skew braces. An analogous result is proven for the variety of post-Lie algebras over a fixed field.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result is significant for the categorical algebra of structures tied to the Yang-Baxter equation, as it supplies a negative answer to the existence of split extension classifiers and clarifies action accessibility properties in these varieties.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on method: the claim that failure of the Huq centraliser condition establishes non-action accessibility is load-bearing, yet the precise implication (i.e., why the computed centraliser behaviour entails the non-existence of split extension classifiers) is not made explicit; the full derivation is unavailable for verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their comment. We address the concern regarding the abstract below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity on the relevant implication.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on method: the claim that failure of the Huq centraliser condition establishes non-action accessibility is load-bearing, yet the precise implication (i.e., why the computed centraliser behaviour entails the non-existence of split extension classifiers) is not made explicit; the full derivation is unavailable for verification.

Authors: We agree that the abstract assumes familiarity with the relevant equivalences in categorical algebra and does not spell out the chain of implications. In a variety of algebras, action accessibility is equivalent to the existence of split extension classifiers; the Huq centraliser condition provides a necessary criterion whose failure implies the non-existence of such classifiers. The manuscript establishes the failure of this condition for skew braces (and analogously for post-Lie algebras) via explicit computation, which yields the negative answer to the Oberwolfach question. The full derivation appears in Sections 3–4 of the paper. To address the referee’s point we will revise the abstract to include one additional sentence making this logical connection explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct proof via external Huq centraliser

full rationale

The derivation shows non-action accessibility of skew braces by computing the Huq centraliser and verifying its failure, using the standard external definition of that notion in semi-abelian categories. No equations reduce by construction to fitted inputs, no self-citations are load-bearing for the central implication, and the argument does not rename or smuggle ansatzes. The result is a standard categorical verification against an independent benchmark (Huq's centraliser), hence self-contained with score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard definition of action accessibility in a variety via Huq centralisers
The proof strategy rests on this categorical notion being the correct test for the property.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5606 in / 1047 out tokens · 20654 ms · 2026-06-28T23:32:12.001719+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[1]

E. Acri, M. Bonatto, Skew braces of sizep2qI: Abelian type, Algebra Colloq. 29 (2) (2022) 297–320. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S1005386722000244

work page doi:10.1142/s1005386722000244 2022
[2]

Agore, A

A. Agore, A. Chirvasitu, On the category of hopf braces (2025). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06280

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

Angiono, C

I. Angiono, C. Galindo, L. Vendramin, Hopf braces and Yang-Baxter operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (5) (2017) 1981–1995. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13395

work page doi:10.1090/proc/13395 2017
[4]

Bachiller, Classification of braces of orderp 3, J

D. Bachiller, Classification of braces of orderp 3, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219 (8) (2015) 3568–3603. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2014.12.013

work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2014.12.013 2015
[5]

Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras, in: Algebra and applications 1: Non- Associative Algebras and Categories, ISTE, London, 2020, pp

C. Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras, in: Algebra and applications 1: Non- Associative Algebras and Categories, ISTE, London, 2020, pp. 245–273. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119818175.ch7

work page doi:10.1002/9781119818175.ch7 2020
[6]

C. Bai, L. Guo, Y. Sheng, R. Tang, Post-groups, (Lie-)Butcher groups and the Yang-Baxter equation, Math. Ann. 388 (3) (2024) 3127–3167. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02592-z

work page doi:10.1007/s00208-023-02592-z 2024
[7]

Ballester-Bolinches, R

A. Ballester-Bolinches, R. Esteban-Romero, M. Ferrara, V. Pérez-Calabuig, M. Trombetti, Central nilpotency of left skew braces and solutions of the Yang- Baxter equation, Pacific J. Math. 335 (1) (2025) 1–32. URLhttps://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2025.335.1

work page doi:10.2140/pjm.2025.335.1 2025
[8]

Ballester-Bolinches, R

A. Ballester-Bolinches, R. Esteban-Romero, P. Jiménez-Seral, V. Pérez-Calabuig, Soluble skew left braces and soluble solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation, Adv. Math. 455 (2024) Paper No. 109880, 27. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2024.109880

work page doi:10.1016/j.aim.2024.109880 2024
[9]

V. G. Bardakov, M. V. Neshchadim, M. K. Yadav, Computing skew left braces of small orders, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 30 (4) (2020) 839–851. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0218196720500216

work page doi:10.1142/s0218196720500216 2020
[10]

Bonatto, P

M. Bonatto, P. Jedlička, Central nilpotency of skew braces, J. Algebra Appl. 22 (12) (2023) Paper No. 2350255, 16. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498823502559

work page doi:10.1142/s0219498823502559 2023
[11]

Borceux, G

F. Borceux, G. Janelidze, G. M. Kelly, Internal object actions, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 46 (2) (2005) 235–255

2005
[12]

Bourn, A

D. Bourn, A. Facchini, M. Pompili, Aspects of the category SKB of skew braces, Comm. Algebra 51 (5) (2023) 2129–2143. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2022.2151609

work page doi:10.1080/00927872.2022.2151609 2023
[13]

Bourn, G

D. Bourn, G. Janelidze, Characterization of protomodular varieties of universal al- gebras, Theory Appl. Categ. 11 (6) (2003) 143–147. 15

2003
[14]

Bourn, G

D. Bourn, G. Janelidze, Centralizers in action accessible categories, Cah. Topol. Géom. Différ. Catég. 50 (3) (2009) 211–232. URLhttps://www.numdam.org/item/CTGDC_2009__50_3_211_0/

2009
[15]

J. Brox, X. García-Martínez, M. Mancini, T. Van der Linden, C. Vienne, Weak representability of actions of non-associative algebras, J. Algebra 669 (2025) 401– 444. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.02.007

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.02.007 2025
[16]

Burde, Simple left-symmetric algebras with solvable Lie algebra, Manuscripta Math

D. Burde, Simple left-symmetric algebras with solvable Lie algebra, Manuscripta Math. 95 (3) (1998) 397–411. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s002290050037

work page doi:10.1007/s002290050037 1998
[17]

Burde, K

D. Burde, K. Dekimpe, M. Monadjem, Post-Lie algebra structures for perfect Lie algebras, Comm. Algebra 52 (10) (2024) 4255–4267. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2024.2344638

work page doi:10.1080/00927872.2024.2344638 2024
[18]

Catino, I

F. Catino, I. Colazzo, P. Stefanelli, Skew left braces with non-trivial annihilator, J. Algebra Appl. 18 (2) (2019) 1950033, 23. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498819500336

work page doi:10.1142/s0219498819500336 2019
[19]

F. Cedó, E. Jespers, J. Okniński, Braces and the Yang-Baxter equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 327 (1) (2014) 101–116. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-1935-y

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-014-1935-y 2014
[20]

F. Cedó, A. Smoktunowicz, L. Vendramin, Skew left braces of nilpotent type, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 118 (6) (2019) 1367–1392. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1112/plms.12209

work page doi:10.1112/plms.12209 2019
[21]

A. S. Cigoli, S. Mantovani, Action accessibility via centralizers, J. Pure Appl. Alge- bra 216 (8-9) (2012) 1852–1865. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2012.02.023

work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2012.02.023 2012
[22]

Colazzo, J

I. Colazzo, J. Plavnik, E. Rowell, L. Vendramin, Mini-workshop: The Yang—Baxter Equation and Representations of Braid Groups, Oberwolfach Rep. 2 (no. 4) (2025) pp. 2633–2672. URLhttps://ems.press/journals/owr/articles/14299580

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Curry, K

C. Curry, K. Ebrahimi-Fard, H. Munthe-Kaas, What is a post-lie algebra and why is it useful in geometric integration, in: F. A. Radu, K. Kumar, I. Berre, J. M. Nordbotten, I. S. Pop (eds.), Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2017, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, pp. 429–437. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96415-7_38

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96415-7_38 2017
[24]

V. G. Drinfeld, On some unsolved problems in quantum group theory, in: Quantum groups (Leningrad, 1990), vol. 1510 of Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, 1992, pp. 1–8. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0101175 16

work page doi:10.1007/bfb0101175 1990
[25]

Etingof, T

P. Etingof, T. Schedler, A. Soloviev, Set-theoretical solutions to the quantum Yang- Baxter equation, Duke Math. J. 100 (2) (1999) 169–209. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-99-10007-X

work page doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-99-10007-x 1999
[26]

Facchini, M

A. Facchini, M. Pompili, Semidirect products of digroups and skew braces, Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 31 (1) (2024) 40–53. URLhttps://doi.org/10.36045/j.bbms.230825

work page doi:10.36045/j.bbms.230825 2024
[27]

URLhttps://www.gap-system.org

The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.13.0 (2024). URLhttps://www.gap-system.org

2024
[28]

García-Martínez, T

X. García-Martínez, T. Van der Linden, A characterisation of Lie algebras amongst anti-commutative algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223 (11) (2019) 4857–4870. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2019.02.018

work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2019.02.018 2019
[29]

M. Gran, A. Sciandra, Hopf braces and semi-abelian categories, J. Algebra 690 (2026) 266–303. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.10.048

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.10.048 2026
[30]

Guarnieri, L

L. Guarnieri, L. Vendramin, Skew braces and the Yang-Baxter equation, Math. Comp. 86 (307) (2017) 2519–2534. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3161

work page doi:10.1090/mcom/3161 2017
[31]

S. A. Huq, Commutator, nilpotency, and solvability in categories, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 19 (1968) 363–389. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/19.1.363

work page doi:10.1093/qmath/19.1.363 1968
[32]

Janelidze, L

G. Janelidze, L. Márki, W. Tholen, Semi-abelian categories, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 168 (2) (2002) 367–386. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4049(01)00103-7

work page doi:10.1016/s0022-4049(01)00103-7 2002
[33]

Kozakai, C

Y. Kozakai, C. Tsang, Representation theory of skew braces, Int. J. Group Theory 14 (3) (2025) 149–164. URLhttps://doi.org/10.22108/ijgt.2024.142261.1913

work page doi:10.22108/ijgt.2024.142261.1913 2025
[34]

Letourmy, L

T. Letourmy, L. Vendramin, Schur covers of skew braces, J. Algebra 644 (2024) 609–654. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2024.01.021

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2024.01.021 2024
[35]

J.-H. Lu, M. Yan, Y.-C. Zhu, On the set-theoretical Yang-Baxter equation, Duke Math. J. 104 (1) (2000) 1–18. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-00-10411-5

work page doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-00-10411-5 2000
[36]

Mazzotta, B

M. Mazzotta, B. Rybołowicz, P. Stefanelli, Deformed solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation associated to dual weak braces, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 204 (2) (2025) 711–731. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-024-01502-7

work page doi:10.1007/s10231-024-01502-7 2025
[37]

Algebra 540 (2019) 156–167

T.Nasybullov, Connectionsbetweenpropertiesoftheadditiveandthemultiplicative groups of a two-sided skew brace, J. Algebra 540 (2019) 156–167. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.05.005 17

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.05.005 2019
[38]

Rathee, A

N. Rathee, A. Udeep, Representations of skew braces, arXiv:2408.03766. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03766

work page arXiv
[39]

Reimaa, T

U. Reimaa, T. Van der Linden, C. Vienne, Associativity and the cosmash product in operadic varieties of algebras, Illinois J. Math. 67 (3) (2023) 563–598. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1215/00192082-10678862

work page doi:10.1215/00192082-10678862 2023
[40]

Rump, Braces, radical rings, and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation, J

W. Rump, Braces, radical rings, and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation, J. Algebra 307 (1) (2007) 153–170. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.03.040

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.03.040 2007
[41]

Smoktunowicz, On Engel groups, nilpotent groups, rings, braces and the Yang- Baxter equation, Trans

A. Smoktunowicz, On Engel groups, nilpotent groups, rings, braces and the Yang- Baxter equation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (9) (2018) 6535–6564. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1090/tran/7179

work page doi:10.1090/tran/7179 2018
[42]

Smoktunowicz, L

A. Smoktunowicz, L. Vendramin, On skew braces (with an appendix by N. Byott and L. Vendramin), J. Comb. Algebra 2 (1) (2018) 47–86. URLhttps://doi.org/10.4171/JCA/2-1-3

work page doi:10.4171/jca/2-1-3 2018
[43]

Soloviev, Non-unitary set-theoretical solutions to the quantum Yang-Baxter equation, Math

A. Soloviev, Non-unitary set-theoretical solutions to the quantum Yang-Baxter equation, Math. Res. Lett. 7 (5-6) (2000) 577–596. URLhttps://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2000.v7.n5.a4

work page doi:10.4310/mrl.2000.v7.n5.a4 2000
[44]

Trappeniers, On two-sided skew braces, J

S. Trappeniers, On two-sided skew braces, J. Algebra 631 (2023) 267–286. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2023.05.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2023.05.003 2023
[45]

Trappeniers, A Lazard correspondence for post-Lie rings and skew braces, arXiv:2406.02475

S. Trappeniers, A Lazard correspondence for post-Lie rings and skew braces, arXiv:2406.02475. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02475

work page arXiv
[46]

C. S. Y. Tsang, On Grün’s lemma for perfect skew braces, J. Math. Soc. Japan 78 (2). URLhttps://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/94549454

work page doi:10.2969/jmsj/94549454
[47]

Vallette, Homology of generalized partition posets, J

B. Vallette, Homology of generalized partition posets, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 208 (2) (2007) 699–725. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2006.03.012

work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2006.03.012 2007
[48]

Vendramin, O

L. Vendramin, O. Konovalov, YangBaxter, Combinatorial Solutions for the Yang-Baxter equation, Version 0.10.4,https://gap-packages.github.io/ YangBaxter, GAP package (Mar 2024)

2024
[49]

Zhu, The construction of braided tensor categories from Hopf braces, Linear Multilinear Algebra 70 (16) (2022) 3171–3188

H. Zhu, The construction of braided tensor categories from Hopf braces, Linear Multilinear Algebra 70 (16) (2022) 3171–3188. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2020.1828249 18

work page doi:10.1080/03081087.2020.1828249 2022

[1] [1]

E. Acri, M. Bonatto, Skew braces of sizep2qI: Abelian type, Algebra Colloq. 29 (2) (2022) 297–320. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S1005386722000244

work page doi:10.1142/s1005386722000244 2022

[2] [2]

Agore, A

A. Agore, A. Chirvasitu, On the category of hopf braces (2025). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06280

work page arXiv 2025

[3] [3]

Angiono, C

I. Angiono, C. Galindo, L. Vendramin, Hopf braces and Yang-Baxter operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (5) (2017) 1981–1995. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13395

work page doi:10.1090/proc/13395 2017

[4] [4]

Bachiller, Classification of braces of orderp 3, J

D. Bachiller, Classification of braces of orderp 3, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219 (8) (2015) 3568–3603. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2014.12.013

work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2014.12.013 2015

[5] [5]

Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras, in: Algebra and applications 1: Non- Associative Algebras and Categories, ISTE, London, 2020, pp

C. Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras, in: Algebra and applications 1: Non- Associative Algebras and Categories, ISTE, London, 2020, pp. 245–273. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119818175.ch7

work page doi:10.1002/9781119818175.ch7 2020

[6] [6]

C. Bai, L. Guo, Y. Sheng, R. Tang, Post-groups, (Lie-)Butcher groups and the Yang-Baxter equation, Math. Ann. 388 (3) (2024) 3127–3167. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-023-02592-z

work page doi:10.1007/s00208-023-02592-z 2024

[7] [7]

Ballester-Bolinches, R

A. Ballester-Bolinches, R. Esteban-Romero, M. Ferrara, V. Pérez-Calabuig, M. Trombetti, Central nilpotency of left skew braces and solutions of the Yang- Baxter equation, Pacific J. Math. 335 (1) (2025) 1–32. URLhttps://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2025.335.1

work page doi:10.2140/pjm.2025.335.1 2025

[8] [8]

Ballester-Bolinches, R

A. Ballester-Bolinches, R. Esteban-Romero, P. Jiménez-Seral, V. Pérez-Calabuig, Soluble skew left braces and soluble solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation, Adv. Math. 455 (2024) Paper No. 109880, 27. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2024.109880

work page doi:10.1016/j.aim.2024.109880 2024

[9] [9]

V. G. Bardakov, M. V. Neshchadim, M. K. Yadav, Computing skew left braces of small orders, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 30 (4) (2020) 839–851. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0218196720500216

work page doi:10.1142/s0218196720500216 2020

[10] [10]

Bonatto, P

M. Bonatto, P. Jedlička, Central nilpotency of skew braces, J. Algebra Appl. 22 (12) (2023) Paper No. 2350255, 16. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498823502559

work page doi:10.1142/s0219498823502559 2023

[11] [11]

Borceux, G

F. Borceux, G. Janelidze, G. M. Kelly, Internal object actions, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 46 (2) (2005) 235–255

2005

[12] [12]

Bourn, A

D. Bourn, A. Facchini, M. Pompili, Aspects of the category SKB of skew braces, Comm. Algebra 51 (5) (2023) 2129–2143. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2022.2151609

work page doi:10.1080/00927872.2022.2151609 2023

[13] [13]

Bourn, G

D. Bourn, G. Janelidze, Characterization of protomodular varieties of universal al- gebras, Theory Appl. Categ. 11 (6) (2003) 143–147. 15

2003

[14] [14]

Bourn, G

D. Bourn, G. Janelidze, Centralizers in action accessible categories, Cah. Topol. Géom. Différ. Catég. 50 (3) (2009) 211–232. URLhttps://www.numdam.org/item/CTGDC_2009__50_3_211_0/

2009

[15] [15]

J. Brox, X. García-Martínez, M. Mancini, T. Van der Linden, C. Vienne, Weak representability of actions of non-associative algebras, J. Algebra 669 (2025) 401– 444. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.02.007

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.02.007 2025

[16] [16]

Burde, Simple left-symmetric algebras with solvable Lie algebra, Manuscripta Math

D. Burde, Simple left-symmetric algebras with solvable Lie algebra, Manuscripta Math. 95 (3) (1998) 397–411. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s002290050037

work page doi:10.1007/s002290050037 1998

[17] [17]

Burde, K

D. Burde, K. Dekimpe, M. Monadjem, Post-Lie algebra structures for perfect Lie algebras, Comm. Algebra 52 (10) (2024) 4255–4267. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2024.2344638

work page doi:10.1080/00927872.2024.2344638 2024

[18] [18]

Catino, I

F. Catino, I. Colazzo, P. Stefanelli, Skew left braces with non-trivial annihilator, J. Algebra Appl. 18 (2) (2019) 1950033, 23. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498819500336

work page doi:10.1142/s0219498819500336 2019

[19] [19]

F. Cedó, E. Jespers, J. Okniński, Braces and the Yang-Baxter equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 327 (1) (2014) 101–116. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-1935-y

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-014-1935-y 2014

[20] [20]

F. Cedó, A. Smoktunowicz, L. Vendramin, Skew left braces of nilpotent type, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 118 (6) (2019) 1367–1392. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1112/plms.12209

work page doi:10.1112/plms.12209 2019

[21] [21]

A. S. Cigoli, S. Mantovani, Action accessibility via centralizers, J. Pure Appl. Alge- bra 216 (8-9) (2012) 1852–1865. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2012.02.023

work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2012.02.023 2012

[22] [22]

Colazzo, J

I. Colazzo, J. Plavnik, E. Rowell, L. Vendramin, Mini-workshop: The Yang—Baxter Equation and Representations of Braid Groups, Oberwolfach Rep. 2 (no. 4) (2025) pp. 2633–2672. URLhttps://ems.press/journals/owr/articles/14299580

work page arXiv 2025

[23] [23]

Curry, K

C. Curry, K. Ebrahimi-Fard, H. Munthe-Kaas, What is a post-lie algebra and why is it useful in geometric integration, in: F. A. Radu, K. Kumar, I. Berre, J. M. Nordbotten, I. S. Pop (eds.), Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2017, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, pp. 429–437. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96415-7_38

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96415-7_38 2017

[24] [24]

V. G. Drinfeld, On some unsolved problems in quantum group theory, in: Quantum groups (Leningrad, 1990), vol. 1510 of Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, 1992, pp. 1–8. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0101175 16

work page doi:10.1007/bfb0101175 1990

[25] [25]

Etingof, T

P. Etingof, T. Schedler, A. Soloviev, Set-theoretical solutions to the quantum Yang- Baxter equation, Duke Math. J. 100 (2) (1999) 169–209. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-99-10007-X

work page doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-99-10007-x 1999

[26] [26]

Facchini, M

A. Facchini, M. Pompili, Semidirect products of digroups and skew braces, Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 31 (1) (2024) 40–53. URLhttps://doi.org/10.36045/j.bbms.230825

work page doi:10.36045/j.bbms.230825 2024

[27] [27]

URLhttps://www.gap-system.org

The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.13.0 (2024). URLhttps://www.gap-system.org

2024

[28] [28]

García-Martínez, T

X. García-Martínez, T. Van der Linden, A characterisation of Lie algebras amongst anti-commutative algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223 (11) (2019) 4857–4870. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2019.02.018

work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2019.02.018 2019

[29] [29]

M. Gran, A. Sciandra, Hopf braces and semi-abelian categories, J. Algebra 690 (2026) 266–303. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.10.048

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.10.048 2026

[30] [30]

Guarnieri, L

L. Guarnieri, L. Vendramin, Skew braces and the Yang-Baxter equation, Math. Comp. 86 (307) (2017) 2519–2534. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3161

work page doi:10.1090/mcom/3161 2017

[31] [31]

S. A. Huq, Commutator, nilpotency, and solvability in categories, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 19 (1968) 363–389. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/19.1.363

work page doi:10.1093/qmath/19.1.363 1968

[32] [32]

Janelidze, L

G. Janelidze, L. Márki, W. Tholen, Semi-abelian categories, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 168 (2) (2002) 367–386. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4049(01)00103-7

work page doi:10.1016/s0022-4049(01)00103-7 2002

[33] [33]

Kozakai, C

Y. Kozakai, C. Tsang, Representation theory of skew braces, Int. J. Group Theory 14 (3) (2025) 149–164. URLhttps://doi.org/10.22108/ijgt.2024.142261.1913

work page doi:10.22108/ijgt.2024.142261.1913 2025

[34] [34]

Letourmy, L

T. Letourmy, L. Vendramin, Schur covers of skew braces, J. Algebra 644 (2024) 609–654. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2024.01.021

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2024.01.021 2024

[35] [35]

J.-H. Lu, M. Yan, Y.-C. Zhu, On the set-theoretical Yang-Baxter equation, Duke Math. J. 104 (1) (2000) 1–18. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-00-10411-5

work page doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-00-10411-5 2000

[36] [36]

Mazzotta, B

M. Mazzotta, B. Rybołowicz, P. Stefanelli, Deformed solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation associated to dual weak braces, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 204 (2) (2025) 711–731. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-024-01502-7

work page doi:10.1007/s10231-024-01502-7 2025

[37] [37]

Algebra 540 (2019) 156–167

T.Nasybullov, Connectionsbetweenpropertiesoftheadditiveandthemultiplicative groups of a two-sided skew brace, J. Algebra 540 (2019) 156–167. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.05.005 17

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.05.005 2019

[38] [38]

Rathee, A

N. Rathee, A. Udeep, Representations of skew braces, arXiv:2408.03766. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03766

work page arXiv

[39] [39]

Reimaa, T

U. Reimaa, T. Van der Linden, C. Vienne, Associativity and the cosmash product in operadic varieties of algebras, Illinois J. Math. 67 (3) (2023) 563–598. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1215/00192082-10678862

work page doi:10.1215/00192082-10678862 2023

[40] [40]

Rump, Braces, radical rings, and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation, J

W. Rump, Braces, radical rings, and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation, J. Algebra 307 (1) (2007) 153–170. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.03.040

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.03.040 2007

[41] [41]

Smoktunowicz, On Engel groups, nilpotent groups, rings, braces and the Yang- Baxter equation, Trans

A. Smoktunowicz, On Engel groups, nilpotent groups, rings, braces and the Yang- Baxter equation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (9) (2018) 6535–6564. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1090/tran/7179

work page doi:10.1090/tran/7179 2018

[42] [42]

Smoktunowicz, L

A. Smoktunowicz, L. Vendramin, On skew braces (with an appendix by N. Byott and L. Vendramin), J. Comb. Algebra 2 (1) (2018) 47–86. URLhttps://doi.org/10.4171/JCA/2-1-3

work page doi:10.4171/jca/2-1-3 2018

[43] [43]

Soloviev, Non-unitary set-theoretical solutions to the quantum Yang-Baxter equation, Math

A. Soloviev, Non-unitary set-theoretical solutions to the quantum Yang-Baxter equation, Math. Res. Lett. 7 (5-6) (2000) 577–596. URLhttps://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2000.v7.n5.a4

work page doi:10.4310/mrl.2000.v7.n5.a4 2000

[44] [44]

Trappeniers, On two-sided skew braces, J

S. Trappeniers, On two-sided skew braces, J. Algebra 631 (2023) 267–286. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2023.05.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2023.05.003 2023

[45] [45]

Trappeniers, A Lazard correspondence for post-Lie rings and skew braces, arXiv:2406.02475

S. Trappeniers, A Lazard correspondence for post-Lie rings and skew braces, arXiv:2406.02475. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02475

work page arXiv

[46] [46]

C. S. Y. Tsang, On Grün’s lemma for perfect skew braces, J. Math. Soc. Japan 78 (2). URLhttps://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/94549454

work page doi:10.2969/jmsj/94549454

[47] [47]

Vallette, Homology of generalized partition posets, J

B. Vallette, Homology of generalized partition posets, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 208 (2) (2007) 699–725. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2006.03.012

work page doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2006.03.012 2007

[48] [48]

Vendramin, O

L. Vendramin, O. Konovalov, YangBaxter, Combinatorial Solutions for the Yang-Baxter equation, Version 0.10.4,https://gap-packages.github.io/ YangBaxter, GAP package (Mar 2024)

2024

[49] [49]

Zhu, The construction of braided tensor categories from Hopf braces, Linear Multilinear Algebra 70 (16) (2022) 3171–3188

H. Zhu, The construction of braided tensor categories from Hopf braces, Linear Multilinear Algebra 70 (16) (2022) 3171–3188. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2020.1828249 18

work page doi:10.1080/03081087.2020.1828249 2022