pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.31571 · v1 · pith:5LO5XMEEnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

All-Electron Relativistic Fully Self-Consistent GW Study of Heteronuclear Actinide-Containing Diatomics

Jacob Adamski , Vibin Abraham , Dominika Zgid This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 19:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords GW approximationactinide diatomicsrelativistic effectsionization energiesvibrational frequenciesself-consistent GWuranium compoundsspin-orbit coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fully self-consistent GW with exact two-component relativity accurately predicts ionization energies and vibrational frequencies for uranium diatomics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the fully self-consistent GW approximation in an all-electron framework to the molecules UC, UN, UO, and UF, incorporating relativistic effects via the exact two-component formalism. It computes adiabatic ionization energies, electron attachment and detachment energies, equilibrium geometries, and harmonic frequencies, then compares results to experiment and high-accuracy benchmarks. The calculations converge to good agreement for ionization energies and vibrational properties once diffuse basis functions are included. A sympathetic reader would care because the method is starting-point independent and avoids the high cost of wavefunction-based alternatives for these heavy-element systems.

Core claim

The all-electron X2C-scGW method produces ionization energies and vibrational frequencies in very good agreement with experiment and high-accuracy estimates for UC, UN, UO, and UF; electron-attachment and vertical-detachment energies require diffuse basis sets for convergence, and UF demands the two-component treatment because its attachment and detachment energies are strongly affected by spin-orbit coupling.

What carries the argument

The fully self-consistent GW approximation combined with the exact two-component (X2C) relativistic formalism, used all-electron to obtain Green's-function-based energies and spectra.

If this is right

  • scGW ionization energies agree with experiment without dependence on the starting point.
  • Harmonic vibrational frequencies are obtained in close agreement with benchmark values.
  • Diffuse basis sets are required to converge electron-attachment and detachment energies.
  • Spin-orbit coupling in UF necessitates a variational two-component relativistic treatment.
  • X2C-scGW offers a practical route to actinide-molecule energetics and spectroscopy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The demonstrated accuracy on diatomics supports extending the same all-electron X2C-scGW protocol to larger uranium-containing clusters or complexes.
  • The strong sensitivity of UF attachment energies to spin-orbit coupling suggests that scalar-relativistic approximations will remain insufficient for many open-shell actinide systems.
  • Basis-set requirements identified here indicate that future calculations on actinides must allocate resources to diffuse functions when targeting electron energetics.

Load-bearing premise

The exact two-component formalism is sufficient to capture the spin-orbit coupling effects that strongly influence electron-attachment and vertical detachment energies in UF.

What would settle it

A measured or four-component-computed electron-attachment energy for UF that deviates significantly from the X2C-scGW value would falsify the claim that the two-component treatment is adequate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31571 by Dominika Zgid, Jacob Adamski, Vibin Abraham.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Convergence of sc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. a) AEA and b) VDE of the UF molecule calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The fully self-consistent $GW$ (sc$GW$) approximation provides a Green's-function approach that is starting-point independent and offers a favorable cost-to-accuracy balance compared to high-level wavefunction methods. Here, we present an all-electron sc$GW$ study of uranium-containing diatomics (UC, UN, UO, and UF), incorporating relativistic effects through the exact two-component (X2C) formalism. We evaluate adiabatic ionization energies as well as electron-attachment and detachment energetics (AEA and VDE), together with equilibrium structures and harmonic vibrational frequencies, and we assess their sensitivity to basis-set choice and relativistic treatment. We find that sc$GW$ yields ionization energies and vibrational properties in very good agreement with experiment and high-accuracy theoretical estimates. For AEA and VDE, diffuse basis sets are essential for convergence. UF is a particularly challenging case for scalar relativistic methods because its electron-attachment and vertical detachment energies are strongly affected by spin--orbit coupling, highlighting the need for a variational two-component treatment. These results establish all-electron X2C-sc$GW$ as a practical route for accurate actinide-molecule energetics and spectroscopy and motivate future applications to larger uranium-containing systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the fully self-consistent GW (scGW) approximation in an all-electron framework with the exact two-component (X2C) relativistic treatment to the heteronuclear uranium diatomics UC, UN, UO, and UF. It computes adiabatic ionization energies, adiabatic electron affinities (AEA), vertical detachment energies (VDE), equilibrium geometries, and harmonic vibrational frequencies, while examining basis-set and relativistic-treatment sensitivities. The central claim is that scGW produces ionization energies and vibrational properties in very good agreement with experiment and high-accuracy references, that diffuse functions are required for AEA/VDE convergence, and that UF necessitates the two-component treatment because spin-orbit coupling strongly affects its electron-attachment and detachment energies.

Significance. If the numerical results bear out the stated agreement, the work is significant because it demonstrates that all-electron X2C-scGW offers a practical, starting-point-independent route to actinide-molecule energetics and spectroscopy at a cost-accuracy balance superior to high-level wavefunction methods. The explicit identification of basis-set and relativistic requirements for convergence supplies actionable guidance for the community and supports extension to larger uranium-containing systems.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work, the recognition of its significance for actinide-molecule studies, and the recommendation to accept the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct application of established method

full rationale

The manuscript applies the pre-existing fully self-consistent GW approximation together with the exact two-component (X2C) relativistic formalism to four uranium diatomics. No new functional form, ansatz, or uniqueness theorem is derived inside the paper; all reported ionization energies, AEA/VDE values, geometries, and frequencies are numerical outputs of the standard scGW+X2C procedure run on the target molecules. Basis-set and relativistic-treatment sensitivity tests are performed against external experimental and high-level reference data rather than against quantities fitted from the same run. Consequently the central claims do not reduce to self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or load-bearing self-citation chains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are described. Relies on standard quantum chemistry assumptions for GW and X2C.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The fully self-consistent GW approximation is starting-point independent and provides favorable cost-to-accuracy balance.
    Stated in the abstract as background for the method choice.
  • domain assumption The exact two-component formalism adequately incorporates relativistic effects for the studied properties.
    Invoked to justify the treatment of UF and spin-orbit coupling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5755 in / 992 out tokens · 20459 ms · 2026-06-28T19:57:13.026183+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

129 extracted references

  1. [1]

    UC, UN and UO: Basis Set Effects UC, UN, and UO serve as a natural starting point for assessing electron attachment in uranium diatomics, be- cause the added electron primarily occupies a diffuse, largely U 7s-like orbital. Hence accurate prediction of electron affinities requires careful attention to basis set selection, as the attached electron in anion...

  2. [2]

    Ab-initio Green’s function meth- ods describing relativistic effects

    UF: Effect of Spin-Orbit Coupling UF represents a particularly interesting test case for evaluating the treatment of spin-orbit coupling in ac- tinide systems. Upon electron attachment to form UF −, since the 7sis already doubly occupied, the additional electron occupies a uranium 6d orbital (U +[5f37s2] + e − →U[5f 36d17s2]), where strong SOC effects in ...

  3. [3]

    S.; Schreckenbach, G

    Oakley, M. S.; Schreckenbach, G. Trends in Methanol- Solvated Actinide Ions and Actinide Expanded Por- phyrin Complexes.Inorganic Chemistry2024,64, 242– 254

  4. [4]

    J.; Autschbach, J.; Batista, E.; Yang, P

    Duignan, T. J.; Autschbach, J.; Batista, E.; Yang, P. As- sessment of tuned range separated exchange functionals for spectroscopies and properties of uranium complexes. Journal of chemical theory and computation2017,13, 3614–3625

  5. [5]

    Lan, J.-H.; Wang, C.-Z.; Wu, Q.-Y.; Wang, S.-A.; Feng, Y.-X.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Chai, Z.-F.; Shi, W.-Q. A quasi-relativistic density functional theory study of the 10 actinyl (VI, V)(An= U, Np, Pu) complexes with a six- membered macrocycle containing pyrrole, pyridine, and furan subunits.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2015,119, 9178–9188

    2015

  6. [6]

    Extension of the D3 and D4 London dispersion corrections to the full actinides series.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2024,26, 21379–21394

    Wittmann, L.; Gordiy, I.; Friede, M.; Helmich-Paris, B.; Grimme, S.; Hansen, A.; Bursch, M. Extension of the D3 and D4 London dispersion corrections to the full actinides series.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2024,26, 21379–21394

    2024

  7. [7]

    K.; Saue, T

    South, C.; Shee, A.; Mukherjee, D.; Wilson, A. K.; Saue, T. 4-Component relativistic calculations of L 3 ionization and excitations for the isoelectronic species UO 2 2+, OUN+ and UN 2.Physical Chemistry Chem- ical Physics2016,18, 21010–21023

  8. [8]

    R.; Martin, R

    Batista, E. R.; Martin, R. L.; Yang, P. Computational Studies of Bonding and Reactivity in Actinide Molec- ular Complexes.Computational Methods in Lanthanide and Actinide Chemistry2015, 375–400

  9. [9]

    New Method for Calculating the One-Particle Green’s Function with Application to the Electron-Gas Problem.Phys

    Hedin, L. New Method for Calculating the One-Particle Green’s Function with Application to the Electron-Gas Problem.Phys. Rev.1965,139, A796–A823

    1965

  10. [10]

    Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches.Rev

    Onida, G.; Reining, L.; Rubio, A. Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches.Rev. Mod. Phys.2002,74, 601–659

    2002

  11. [11]

    The GW Com- pendium: A Practical Guide to Theoretical Photoemis- sion Spectroscopy.Front

    Golze, D.; Dvorak, M.; Rinke, P. The GW Com- pendium: A Practical Guide to Theoretical Photoemis- sion Spectroscopy.Front. Chem.2019,7

    2019

  12. [12]

    Bruneval, F.; Dattani, N.; van Setten, M. J. The GW Miracle in Many-Body Perturbation Theory for the Ion- ization Potential of Molecules.Front. Chem.2021,9

    2021

  13. [13]

    An O(N3) implementation of Hedin’s GW approximation for molecules.J

    Foerster, D.; Koval, P.; S´ anchez-Portal, D. An O(N3) implementation of Hedin’s GW approximation for molecules.J. Chem. Phys.2011,135, 074105

    2011

  14. [14]

    Resolution-of-identity approach to Hartree–Fock, hy- brid density functionals, RPA, MP2 and GW with nu- meric atom-centered orbital basis functions.New J

    Ren, X.; Rinke, P.; Blum, V.; Wieferink, J.; Tkatchenko, A.; Sanfilippo, A.; Reuter, K.; Scheffler, M. Resolution-of-identity approach to Hartree–Fock, hy- brid density functionals, RPA, MP2 and GW with nu- meric atom-centered orbital basis functions.New J. Phys.2012,14, 053020

    2012

  15. [15]

    Katharina Krause, M. E. H.; Klopper, W. Coupled- cluster reference values for the GW27 and GW100 test sets for the assessment of GW methods.Molecular Physics2015,113, 1952–1960

    1952

  16. [16]

    J.; Rinke, P

    Caruso, F.; Dauth, M.; van Setten, M. J.; Rinke, P. Benchmark of GW Approaches for the GW100 Test Set. J. Chem. Theory Comput.2016,12, 5076–5087, PMID: 27631585

    2016

  17. [17]

    Scalable Molecular GW Calculations: Valence and Core Spectra.J

    Mejia-Rodriguez, D.; Kunitsa, A.; Apr` a, E.; Govind, N. Scalable Molecular GW Calculations: Valence and Core Spectra.J. Chem. Theory Comput.2021,17, 7504– 7517, PMID: 34855381

    2021

  18. [18]

    Robust Analytic-Continuation Approach to Many-Body GW Calculations.J

    Duchemin, I.; Blase, X. Robust Analytic-Continuation Approach to Many-Body GW Calculations.J. Chem. Theory Comput.2020,16, 1742–1756, PMID: 32023052

    2020

  19. [19]

    E.; Seiler, C.; Weigend, F.; Ev- ers, F.; van Setten, M

    Kaplan, F.; Harding, M. E.; Seiler, C.; Weigend, F.; Ev- ers, F.; van Setten, M. J. Quasi-particle self-consistent GW for molecules.J. Chem. Theory Comput.2016,12, 2528–2541

    2016

  20. [20]

    J.; Costa, R.; Vi˜ nes, F.; Illas, F

    van Setten, M. J.; Costa, R.; Vi˜ nes, F.; Illas, F. Assess- ing GW Approaches for Predicting Core Level Binding Energies.J. Chem. Theory Comput.2018,14, 877–883, PMID: 29320628

    2018

  21. [21]

    Accurate Absolute and Relative Core-Level Binding Energies from GW

    Golze, D.; Keller, L.; Rinke, P. Accurate Absolute and Relative Core-Level Binding Energies from GW. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.2020,11, 1840–1847, PMID: 32043890

    2020

  22. [22]

    S.; Conard, T.; Escudero, D.; Pourtois, G.; van Setten, M

    Galleni, L.; Sajjadian, F. S.; Conard, T.; Escudero, D.; Pourtois, G.; van Setten, M. J. Modeling X-ray Pho- toelectron Spectroscopy of Macromolecules Using GW. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.2022,13, 8666–8672, PMID: 36084286

    2022

  23. [23]

    Bench- mark of GW Methods for Core-Level Binding Energies

    Li, J.; Jin, Y.; Rinke, P.; Yang, W.; Golze, D. Bench- mark of GW Methods for Core-Level Binding Energies. J. Chem. Theory Comput.2022,18, 7570–7585, PMID: 36322136

    2022

  24. [24]

    Basis Set Selection for Molecular Core-Level GW Calcu- lations.J

    Mejia-Rodriguez, D.; Kunitsa, A.; Apr` a, E.; Govind, N. Basis Set Selection for Molecular Core-Level GW Calcu- lations.J. Chem. Theory Comput.2022,18, 4919–4926, PMID: 35816679

    2022

  25. [25]

    A.; Zgid, D.; Gull, E

    Iskakov, S.; Rusakov, A. A.; Zgid, D.; Gull, E. Effect of propagator renormalization on the band gap of insulat- ing solids.Phys. Rev. B2019,100, 085112

  26. [26]

    Fully self- consistent finite-temperatureGWin Gaussian Bloch or- bitals for solids.Phys

    Yeh, C.-N.; Iskakov, S.; Zgid, D.; Gull, E. Fully self- consistent finite-temperatureGWin Gaussian Bloch or- bitals for solids.Phys. Rev. B2022,106, 235104

  27. [27]

    Ab initio self- energy embedding for the photoemission spectra of NiO and MnO.Phys

    Iskakov, S.; Yeh, C.-N.; Gull, E.; Zgid, D. Ab initio self- energy embedding for the photoemission spectra of NiO and MnO.Phys. Rev. B2020,102, 085105

  28. [28]

    N.; Shee, A.; Li, J.; Gull, E.; Zgid, D

    Lan, T. N.; Shee, A.; Li, J.; Gull, E.; Zgid, D. Testing self-energy embedding theory in combination with GW. Phys. Rev. B2017,96, 155106

  29. [29]

    Yeh, C.-N.; Morales, M. A. Low-Scaling Algorithm for the Random Phase Approximation Using Tensor Hyper- contraction with k-point Sampling.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation2023,19, 6197–6207

  30. [30]

    Yeh, C.-N.; Morales, M. A. Low-Scaling Algorithms for GW and Constrained Random Phase Approximation Using Symmetry-Adapted Interpolative Separable Den- sity Fitting.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computa- tion2024,20, 3184–3198

  31. [31]

    Com- pressing Green’s function using intermediate represen- tation between imaginary-time and real-frequency do- mains.Phys

    Shinaoka, H.; Otsuki, J.; Ohzeki, M.; Yoshimi, K. Com- pressing Green’s function using intermediate represen- tation between imaginary-time and real-frequency do- mains.Phys. Rev. B2017,96, 035147

  32. [32]

    E.; van Leeuwen, R

    Stan, A.; Dahlen, N. E.; van Leeuwen, R. Levels of self- consistency in the GW approximation.J. Chem. Phys. 2009,130, 114105

    2009

  33. [33]

    W.; Thygesen, K

    Rostgaard, C.; Jacobsen, K. W.; Thygesen, K. S. Fully self-consistent GW calculations for molecules.Phys. Rev. B2010,81, 085103

  34. [34]

    Unified description of ground and excited states of finite systems: The self-consistentGWapproach.Phys

    Caruso, F.; Rinke, P.; Ren, X.; Scheffler, M.; Rubio, A. Unified description of ground and excited states of finite systems: The self-consistentGWapproach.Phys. Rev. B2012,86, 081102

  35. [35]

    Grumet, M.; Liu, P.; Kaltak, M.; Klimeˇ s, J. c. v.; Kresse, G. Beyond the quasiparticle approximation: Fully self-consistentGWcalculations.Phys. Rev. B 2018,98, 155143

    2018

  36. [36]

    Strange, M.; Rostgaard, C.; H¨ akkinen, H.; Thyge- sen, K. S. Self-consistent GW calculations of electronic transport in thiol- and amine-linked molecular junc- tions.Phys. Rev. B2011,83, 115108

  37. [37]

    Self-consistentGW: All-electron implementa- tion with localized basis functions.Phys

    Caruso, F.; Rinke, P.; Ren, X.; Rubio, A.; Schef- fler, M. Self-consistentGW: All-electron implementa- tion with localized basis functions.Phys. Rev. B2013, 88, 075105

  38. [38]

    Interpretation of multiple solu- 11 tions in fully iterative GF2 and GW schemes using lo- cal analysis of two-particle density matrices.J

    Pokhilko, P.; Zgid, D. Interpretation of multiple solu- 11 tions in fully iterative GF2 and GW schemes using lo- cal analysis of two-particle density matrices.J. Chem. Phys.2021,155, 024101

    2021

  39. [39]

    B.; Zgid, D

    Wen, M.; Abraham, V.; Harsha, G.; Shee, A.; Wha- ley, K. B.; Zgid, D. Comparing Self-Consistent GW and Vertex-Corrected G0W0 (G0W0Γ) Accuracy for Molec- ular Ionization Potentials.J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2024,20, 3109–3120, PMID: 38573104

    2024

  40. [40]

    A.; Zgid, D

    Pokhilko, P.; Yeh, C.-N.; Morales, M. A.; Zgid, D. Ten- sor hypercontraction for fully self-consistent imaginary- time GF2 and GWSOX methods: Theory, implemen- tation, and role of the Green’s function second-order exchange for intermolecular interactions.The Journal of Chemical Physics2024,161, 084108

  41. [41]

    A.; Zgid, D

    Pokhilko, P.; Yeh, C.-N.; Morales, M. A.; Zgid, D. Ten- sor hypercontraction for self-consistent vertex corrected GW with static and dynamic screening; applications to molecules and solids with superexchange.The Journal of Chemical Physics2025,162, 244110

  42. [42]

    F¨ orster, A.; Bruneval, F. Why Does the GW Approx- imation Give Accurate Quasiparticle Energies? The Cancellation of Vertex Corrections Quantified.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters2024,15, 12526– 12534

  43. [43]

    Two-Component GW Calculations: Cubic Scaling Im- plementation and Comparison of Vertex-Corrected and Partially Self-Consistent GW Variants.J

    F¨ orster, A.; van Lenthe, E.; Spadetto, E.; Visscher, L. Two-Component GW Calculations: Cubic Scaling Im- plementation and Comparison of Vertex-Corrected and Partially Self-Consistent GW Variants.J. Chem. The- ory Comput.2023,19, 5958–5976, PMID: 37594901

    2023

  44. [44]

    Beyond Quasi-Particle Self-Consistent GW for Molecules with Vertex Corrections.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation2025,21, 1709– 1721

    F¨ orster, A. Beyond Quasi-Particle Self-Consistent GW for Molecules with Vertex Corrections.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation2025,21, 1709– 1721

  45. [45]

    Fully Dynamic G3W2 Self- Energy for Finite Systems: Formulas and Benchmark

    Bruneval, F.; F¨ orster, A. Fully Dynamic G3W2 Self- Energy for Finite Systems: Formulas and Benchmark. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation2024,20, 3218–3230

  46. [46]

    Finite temperature quantum embed- ding theories for correlated systems.New Journal of Physics2017,19, 023047

    Zgid, D.; Gull, E. Finite temperature quantum embed- ding theories for correlated systems.New Journal of Physics2017,19, 023047

  47. [47]

    Multitier self-consistentGW+ EDMFT.Phys

    Nilsson, F.; Boehnke, L.; Werner, P.; Aryasetiawan, F. Multitier self-consistentGW+ EDMFT.Phys. Rev. Mater.2017,1, 043803

    2017

  48. [48]

    First- Principles Approach to the Electronic Structure of Strongly Correlated Systems: Combining theGWAp- proximation and Dynamical Mean-Field Theory.Phys

    Biermann, S.; Aryasetiawan, F.; Georges, A. First- Principles Approach to the Electronic Structure of Strongly Correlated Systems: Combining theGWAp- proximation and Dynamical Mean-Field Theory.Phys. Rev. Lett.2003,90, 086402

    2003

  49. [49]

    Green’s function formulation of quantum defect embedding the- ory.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2022,18, 3512–3522

    Sheng, N.; Vorwerk, C.; Govoni, M.; Galli, G. Green’s function formulation of quantum defect embedding the- ory.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2022,18, 3512–3522

    2022

  50. [50]

    Sakuma, R.; Friedrich, C.; Miyake, T.; Bl¨ ugel, S.; Aryasetiawan, F.GWcalculations including spin-orbit coupling: Application to Hg chalcogenides.Phys. Rev. B2011,84, 085144

  51. [51]

    Y.; Kotliar, G

    Kutepov, A.; Haule, K.; Savrasov, S. Y.; Kotliar, G. Electronic structure of Pu and Am metals by self- consistent relativisticGWmethod.Phys. Rev. B2012, 85, 155129

  52. [52]

    Effect of spin-orbit interaction on the optical spectra of single-layer, double-layer, and bulk MoS2.Phys

    Molina-S´ anchez, A.; Sangalli, D.; Hummer, K.; Marini, A.; Wirtz, L. Effect of spin-orbit interaction on the optical spectra of single-layer, double-layer, and bulk MoS2.Phys. Rev. B2013,88, 045412

  53. [53]

    GWstudy of topological insulators Bi 2Se3, Bi2Te3, and Sb2Te3: Beyond the perturbative one-shot approach

    Aguilera, I.; Friedrich, C.; Bihlmayer, G.; Bl¨ ugel, S. GWstudy of topological insulators Bi 2Se3, Bi2Te3, and Sb2Te3: Beyond the perturbative one-shot approach. Phys. Rev. B2013,88, 045206

  54. [54]

    Relativistic GW calculations on CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3SnI3 per- ovskites for solar cell applications.Sci

    Umari, P.; Mosconi, E.; De Angelis, F. Relativistic GW calculations on CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3SnI3 per- ovskites for solar cell applications.Sci. Rep.2014,4, 4467

    2014

  55. [55]

    One-Electron Energies from the Two-Component GW Method.J

    K¨ uhn, M.; Weigend, F. One-Electron Energies from the Two-Component GW Method.J. Chem. Theory Com- put.2015,11, 969–979, PMID: 26579751

    2015

  56. [56]

    Imple- mentation and Validation of Fully Relativistic GW Cal- culations: Spin–Orbit Coupling in Molecules, Nanocrys- tals, and Solids.J

    Scherpelz, P.; Govoni, M.; Hamada, I.; Galli, G. Imple- mentation and Validation of Fully Relativistic GW Cal- culations: Spin–Orbit Coupling in Molecules, Nanocrys- tals, and Solids.J. Chem. Theory Comput.2016,12, 3523–3544, PMID: 27331614

    2016

  57. [57]

    Ionized, electron-attached, and excited states of molecular systems with spin–orbit cou- pling: Two-component GW and Bethe–Salpeter imple- mentations.J

    Holzer, C.; Klopper, W. Ionized, electron-attached, and excited states of molecular systems with spin–orbit cou- pling: Two-component GW and Bethe–Salpeter imple- mentations.J. Chem. Phys.2019,150, 204116

    2019

  58. [58]

    GW quasiparticle calculations with spin-orbit coupling for the light actinides.Physical Review B2014,89, 035104

    Ahmed, T.; Zhu, J.-X. GW quasiparticle calculations with spin-orbit coupling for the light actinides.Physical Review B2014,89, 035104

  59. [59]

    I.; Rinke, P.; Schef- fler, M

    Jiang, H.; Gomez-Abal, R. I.; Rinke, P.; Schef- fler, M. First-principles modeling of localized d states with the GW@ LDA+ U approach.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics2010,82, 045108

  60. [60]

    A.; Heaven, M

    Goncharov, V.; Kaledin, L. A.; Heaven, M. C. Probing the electronic structure of UO+ with high-resolution photoelectron spectroscopy.The Journal of Chemical Physics2006,125, 133202

  61. [61]

    Martin, J. M. L. Ab initio total atomization energies of small molecules — towards the basis set limit.Chemical Physics Letters1996,259, 669–678

  62. [62]

    M.; Hirao, K

    Pauloviˇ c, J.; Gagliardi, L.; Dyke, J. M.; Hirao, K. A theoretical study of the gas-phase chemi-ionization re- action between uranium and oxygen atoms.The Journal of Chemical Physics2005,122, 144317

  63. [63]

    J.; Gibson, J

    Kovacs, A.; Konings, R. J.; Gibson, J. K.; Infante, I.; Gagliardi, L. Quantum chemical calculations and ex- perimental investigations of molecular actinide oxides. Chemical Reviews2015,115, 1725–1759

  64. [64]

    InComprehensive Computational Chem- istry (First Edition), first edition ed.; Y´ a˜ nez, M., Boyd, R

    Autschbach, J. InComprehensive Computational Chem- istry (First Edition), first edition ed.; Y´ a˜ nez, M., Boyd, R. J., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2024; pp 177–192

    2024

  65. [65]

    Understanding covalency in molecular f-block compounds from the synergy of spectroscopy and quantum chemistry.Nature Reviews Chemistry2024,8, 701–712

    Kaltsoyannis, N.; Kerridge, A. Understanding covalency in molecular f-block compounds from the synergy of spectroscopy and quantum chemistry.Nature Reviews Chemistry2024,8, 701–712

  66. [66]

    Dolg, M.Computational methods in lanthanide and ac- tinide chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, 2015

    2015

  67. [67]

    Route to Chemical Accuracy for Computational Uranium Thermochemistry.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation2022,18, 6732– 6741, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    Zhang, C.; Cheng, L. Route to Chemical Accuracy for Computational Uranium Thermochemistry.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation2022,18, 6732– 6741, Publisher: American Chemical Society

  68. [68]

    Romeu, J. G. F.; Hunt, A. R. E.; de Melo, G. F.; Peter- son, K. A.; Dixon, D. A. Energetic and Electronic Prop- erties of UO0/±and UF0/±.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A2024,128, 5586–5604, Publisher: Ameri- can Chemical Society

  69. [69]

    F.; Vasiliu, M.; Liu, G.; Ci- borowski, S.; Zhu, Z.; Blankenhorn, M.; Harris, R.; Martinez-Martinez, C.; Dipalo, M.; Peterson, K

    de Melo, G. F.; Vasiliu, M.; Liu, G.; Ci- borowski, S.; Zhu, Z.; Blankenhorn, M.; Harris, R.; Martinez-Martinez, C.; Dipalo, M.; Peterson, K. A.; 12 Bowen, K. H.; Dixon, D. A. Electronic Properties of UN and UN– from Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Corre- lated Molecular Orbital Theory.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A2022,126, 7944–7953, Publisher: Amer...

  70. [70]

    F.; Dixon, D

    de Melo, G. F.; Dixon, D. A. Bonding, Thermodynam- ics, and Spectroscopy of the Metal Borides UB0/+/– and WB0/+/–.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2023,127, 1588–1597, Publisher: American Chemical Society

    2023

  71. [71]

    F.; Vasiliu, M.; Liu, G.; Ci- borowski, S.; Zhu, Z.; Blankenhorn, M.; Harris, R.; Martinez-Martinez, C.; Dipalo, M.; Peterson, K

    de Melo, G. F.; Vasiliu, M.; Liu, G.; Ci- borowski, S.; Zhu, Z.; Blankenhorn, M.; Harris, R.; Martinez-Martinez, C.; Dipalo, M.; Peterson, K. A.; Bowen, K. H.; Dixon, D. A. Theoretical and Experimen- tal Study of the Spectroscopy and Thermochemistry of UC+/0/–.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A2022, 126, 9392–9407, Publisher: American Chemical Society

  72. [72]

    Yousfi, H.; Bensiradj, N. e. H.; Khedidji, M.; Saal, A.; Ouamerali, O. Theoretical investigation of the structure and spectroscopy of uranium oxide species.Theoretical Chemistry Accounts2023,142, 5

  73. [73]

    L.; Shahi, A

    Infante, I.; Kovacs, A.; Macchia, G. L.; Shahi, A. R. M.; Gibson, J. K.; Gagliardi, L. Ionization energies for the actinide mono-and dioxides series, from Th to Cm: the- ory versus experiment.The Journal of Physical Chem- istry A2010,114, 6007–6015

  74. [74]

    O.; Heaven, M

    Antonov, I. O.; Heaven, M. C. Spectroscopic and The- oretical Investigations of UF and UF+.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A2013,117, 9684–9694, Publisher: American Chemical Society

  75. [75]

    R.; Martin, R

    Batista, E. R.; Martin, R. L.; Hay, P. J. Density func- tional investigations of the properties and thermochem- istry of UF n and UCl n (n= 1,. . . , 6).The Journal of chemical physics2004,121, 11104–11111

  76. [76]

    T.; Bai, X.-l.; Heaven, M

    Le, A. T.; Bai, X.-l.; Heaven, M. C.; Steimle, T. C. High resolution electronic spectroscopy of uranium mononi- tride, UN.The Journal of Chemical Physics2023,158, 244301

  77. [77]

    J.; Morse, M

    Matthew, D. J.; Morse, M. D. Resonant two-photon ion- ization spectroscopy of jet-cooled UN: Determination of the ground state.The Journal of Chemical Physics 2013,138, 184303

    2013

  78. [78]

    R.; Bross, D

    Battey, S. R.; Bross, D. H.; Peterson, K. A.; Persinger, T. D.; VanGundy, R. A.; Heaven, M. C. Spec- troscopic and theoretical studies of UN and UN+.The Journal of Chemical Physics2020,152, 094302

  79. [79]

    Ning, J.; Truhlar, D. G. Chemical Bonding in Isoelec- tronic NdO2 and SmO22+.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A2023,127, 2295–2305

  80. [80]

    Relativistic multireference quantum chemi- cal study of the electronic structure of actinide trioxide molecules.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A2017, 121, 2523–2530

    Kov´ acs, A. Relativistic multireference quantum chemi- cal study of the electronic structure of actinide trioxide molecules.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A2017, 121, 2523–2530

Showing first 80 references.