pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00649 · v1 · pith:LCSEGBLNnew · submitted 2026-05-30 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph

Linear causality and stability constraints on relativistic second-order magnetohydrodynamics

Yiwei Qiu , Duan She , Defu Hou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 18:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords relativistic magnetohydrodynamicssecond-order hydrodynamicscausality constraintsstability analysisentropy currentrelaxation dynamicsanisotropic transportlinear modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Causality in relativistic second-order magnetohydrodynamics requires mode-dependent bounds set by the interplay of anisotropic transport coefficients and relaxation times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a second-order relativistic MHD framework from entropy current analysis that adds relaxation dynamics to keep the evolution equations hyperbolic. Linearizing around a uniform equilibrium state, the authors decompose the spectrum into magnetosonic, Alfvén, and charge-diffusion sectors, extract long- and short-wavelength dispersion relations, and read causality and stability limits from the large-wave-number behavior. A reader would care because first-order relativistic fluid models often produce instabilities or superluminal signals in strong magnetic fields, and a controlled second-order extension is needed for consistent modeling of astrophysical and heavy-ion plasmas.

Core claim

Linearization decomposes the excitation spectrum into magnetosonic, Alfvén, and charge-diffusion sectors. Asymptotic dispersion relations are obtained in both small-k and large-k regimes and checked against numerical roots. Causality follows from requiring that propagating branches at large k remain inside the light cone while non-hydrodynamic modes damp; the resulting admissible domain is fixed by the interplay between anisotropic transport coefficients and relaxation times and is intrinsically mode-dependent.

What carries the argument

Linear mode analysis of the decomposed spectrum with asymptotic expansions of the dispersion relations in the long- and short-wavelength limits.

If this is right

  • Inclusion of relaxation terms renders the evolution equations hyperbolic.
  • Causality imposes inequalities that link each anisotropic transport coefficient to its associated relaxation time and differ by propagation sector.
  • Numerical roots of the dispersion polynomial confirm the analytic asymptotics except near special angles where ordinary momentum expansion weakens.
  • Stability requires that non-hydrodynamic modes damp at large wave numbers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mode dependence implies that parameter choices safe for one sector may violate causality in another when the background is inhomogeneous.
  • Numerical codes using this framework would need sector-specific limiters or adaptive relaxation times to remain causal across all propagation directions.
  • Comparison with the non-magnetized second-order theory could quantify how the magnetic field enlarges or restricts the causal domain.
  • Extension to curved spacetime would test whether gravitational redshift alters the large-k bounds.

Load-bearing premise

Linearization around a homogeneous equilibrium state fully captures the causality properties of the theory.

What would settle it

A simulation or exact solution that produces superluminal propagation for any mode outside the derived bounds on the transport coefficients and relaxation times would falsify the claimed constraints.

read the original abstract

In this work, we construct a theoretical framework for relativistic second-order magnetohydrodynamics based on entropy current analysis. The formalism consistently incorporates the relaxation dynamics of dissipative fluxes, ensuring the hyperbolic nature of the evolution equations. Utilizing linear mode analysis, we investigate the constraints imposed by causality and stability on this anisotropic system. By linearizing the theory around a homogeneous equilibrium state, we demonstrate that the excitation spectrum decomposes into magnetosonic, Alfv\'en, and charge-diffusion sectors. For each sector, we derive asymptotic dispersion relations in both the long-wavelength (small-$k$) and short-wavelength (large-$k$) regimes, validating them against exact numerical roots. Our numerical analysis confirms the accuracy of these asymptotic solutions and uncovers a nontrivial angular dependence, especially near special propagation directions where the ordinary momentum expansion becomes less reliable. By evaluating the large-$k$ behavior of the propagating branches alongside the damping properties of non-hydrodynamic modes, we delineate the corresponding causality constraints. We find that the admissible causal domain is governed by the interplay between anisotropic transport coefficients and relaxation times, with the resulting bounds being intrinsically mode-dependent. These findings provide a systematic theoretical foundation for developing stable and causal relativistic magnetohydrodynamics beyond the first-order approximation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a relativistic second-order magnetohydrodynamics framework via entropy-current analysis, incorporating relaxation dynamics to ensure hyperbolicity of the evolution equations. Linearizing around a homogeneous equilibrium state, the excitation spectrum is decomposed into magnetosonic, Alfvén, and charge-diffusion sectors. Asymptotic dispersion relations are derived in the small-k and large-k limits for each sector, validated against numerical roots, and used to extract mode-dependent causality and stability constraints arising from the interplay of anisotropic transport coefficients and relaxation times, with noted angular dependence near special propagation directions.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies concrete, mode-dependent causality bounds for relativistic second-order MHD that go beyond isotropic cases and can directly inform stable numerical implementations in astrophysical or heavy-ion contexts. The combination of analytic large-k asymptotics, numerical validation of the roots, and explicit treatment of anisotropic coefficients constitutes a clear methodological strength.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §4] The abstract states that the ordinary momentum expansion becomes less reliable near special propagation directions; the main text should explicitly identify these angles (e.g., θ=0, π/2 relative to B) and show the modified expansion used to extract the large-k limits.
  2. [§5] A compact table collecting the final causality inequalities for each of the three sectors (with the relevant combinations of transport coefficients and relaxation times) would improve readability and allow immediate comparison with the isotropic limit.
  3. [§2] The entropy-current construction is stated to produce a consistent set of second-order terms; a brief appendix listing the explicit form of the dissipative currents and the resulting relaxation equations would help readers verify the hyperbolicity claim without reconstructing the algebra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript on linear causality and stability constraints in relativistic second-order magnetohydrodynamics. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. However, the report contains no specific major comments requiring point-by-point response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs the second-order relativistic MHD equations via entropy-current analysis, incorporates relaxation dynamics to ensure hyperbolicity, linearizes around homogeneous equilibrium, decomposes into magnetosonic/Alfvén/charge-diffusion sectors, and extracts mode-dependent causality bounds from large-k asymptotics of the dispersion relations. None of these steps reduces a claimed result to its inputs by construction, renames a known pattern, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is presupposed. The bounds emerge from the explicit linear-mode calculation rather than being fitted or smuggled in; the procedure matches standard practice for relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics and remains externally falsifiable via the derived dispersion relations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that entropy-current analysis yields the correct second-order structure and on the further assumption that linear analysis around equilibrium suffices to determine global causality.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Entropy current analysis produces a consistent set of second-order dissipative terms for relativistic MHD that become hyperbolic once relaxation dynamics are included.
    Invoked at the start of the theoretical framework construction.
  • domain assumption Linearization around a homogeneous equilibrium state and decomposition into magnetosonic, Alfvén, and charge-diffusion sectors fully captures the causality and stability properties.
    Used to obtain the dispersion relations and the large-k causality constraints.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5751 in / 1343 out tokens · 29693 ms · 2026-06-28T18:21:14.922811+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

152 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bzdak and V

    A. Bzdak and V. Skokov,Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions,Physics Letters B710(2012) 171–174

    2012

  2. [2]

    Deng and X.-G

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang,Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions,Physical Review C85(2012), no. 4 044907

    2012

  3. [3]

    Tuchin,Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Advances in High Energy Physics2013(2013) 490495

    K. Tuchin,Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Advances in High Energy Physics2013(2013) 490495

    2013

  4. [4]

    Roy and S

    V. Roy and S. Pu,Event-by-event distribution of magnetic field energy over initial fluid energy density in√sN N = 200GeV Au-Au collisions, Physical Review C92(2015), no. 6 064902

    2015

  5. [5]

    Li, X.-L

    H. Li, X.-L. Sheng, and Q. Wang,Electromagnetic fields with electric and chiral magnetic conductivities in heavy ion collisions,Physical Review C94(2016), no. 4 044903

    2016

  6. [6]

    Huang,Electromagnetic fields and anomalous transports in heavy-ion collisions — a pedagogical review,Reports on Progress in Physics79(2016), no

    X.-G. Huang,Electromagnetic fields and anomalous transports in heavy-ion collisions — a pedagogical review,Reports on Progress in Physics79(2016), no. 7 076302

    2016

  7. [7]

    Hattori and X.-G

    K. Hattori and X.-G. Huang,Novel quantum phenomena induced by strong magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions,Nuclear Science and Techniques28(2017), no. 2 26

    2017

  8. [8]

    V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy,Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and dirac semimetals,Physics Reports576(2015) 1–209

    2015

  9. [9]

    Fukushima,Extreme matter in electromagnetic fields and rotation,Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics107(2019) 167–199

    K. Fukushima,Extreme matter in electromagnetic fields and rotation,Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics107(2019) 167–199

    2019

  10. [10]

    Gürsoy, D

    U. Gürsoy, D. Kharzeev, and K. Rajagopal,Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents, and directed flow in heavy ion collisions,Physical Review C89(2014), no. 5 054905

    2014

  11. [11]

    STAR Collaboration,GlobalΛhyperon polarization in nuclear collisions, Nature548 (2017) 62–65

    2017

  12. [12]

    4 044611

    ALICE Collaboration,Global polarization ofΛand Λhyperons in Pb–Pb collisions at√sN N = 2.76and 5.02 TeV, Physical Review C101(2020), no. 4 044611

    2020

  13. [13]

    ALICE Collaboration,Polarization ofΛand Λhyperons along the beam direction in Pb–Pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02TeV, Physical Review Letters128(2022) 172005

    2022

  14. [14]

    ALICE Collaboration,Probing the effects of strong electromagnetic fields with charge-dependent directed flow in Pb–Pb collisions at the LHC,Physical Review Letters125 (2020) 022301

    2020

  15. [15]

    STAR Collaboration,Observation of the electromagnetic field effect via charge-dependent directed flow in heavy-ion collisions at the relativistic heavy ion collider,Physical Review X 14(2024) 011028

    2024

  16. [16]

    25 251601

    STAR Collaboration,Azimuthal charged-particle correlations and possible local strong parity violation, Physical Review Letters103(2009), no. 25 251601

    2009

  17. [17]

    5 054908

    STAR Collaboration,Observation of charge-dependent azimuthal correlations and possible local strong parity violation in heavy ion collisions,Physical Review C81(2010), no. 5 054908. – 48 –

    2010

  18. [18]

    1 012301

    ALICE Collaboration,Charge separation relative to the reaction plane in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76TeV, Physical Review Letters110(2013), no. 1 012301

    2013

  19. [19]

    12 122301

    CMS Collaboration,Observation of charge-dependent azimuthal correlations in p-pb collisions and its implication for the search for the chiral magnetic effect,Physical Review Letters118(2017), no. 12 122301

    2017

  20. [20]

    4 044912

    CMS Collaboration,Constraints on the chiral magnetic effect using charge-dependent azimuthal correlations in pPb and PbPb collisions at the CERN large hadron collider, Physical Review C97(2018), no. 4 044912

    2018

  21. [21]

    6 064908

    CMS Collaboration,Probing the chiral magnetic wave in ppb and pbpb collisions at√sN N = 5.02TeV using charge-dependent azimuthal anisotropies,Physical Review C100 (2019), no. 6 064908

    2019

  22. [22]

    ALICE Collaboration,Search for the chiral magnetic effect with charge-dependent azimuthal correlations in Xe–Xe collisions at√sN N = 5.44TeV, Physics Letters B856(2024) 138862

    2024

  23. [23]

    Kharzeev,Parity violation in hot qcd: Why it can happen, and how to look for it, Physics Letters B633(2006) 260–264

    D. Kharzeev,Parity violation in hot qcd: Why it can happen, and how to look for it, Physics Letters B633(2006) 260–264

    2006

  24. [24]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa,The effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: Event by eventPandCPviolation, Nuclear Physics A803 (2008) 227–253

    2008

  25. [25]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa,The chiral magnetic effect,Physical Review D78(2008), no. 7 074033

    2008

  26. [26]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S. A. Voloshin, and G. Wang,Chiral magnetic and vortical effects in high-energy nuclear collisions – a status report,Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 88(2016) 1–28

    2016

  27. [27]

    Liao,Anomalous transport effects and possible environmental symmetry violation in heavy-ion collisions,Pramana84(2015) 901–926

    J. Liao,Anomalous transport effects and possible environmental symmetry violation in heavy-ion collisions,Pramana84(2015) 901–926

    2015

  28. [28]

    Zhao and F

    J. Zhao and F. Wang,Experimental searches for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics107(2019) 200–236

    2019

  29. [29]

    Huang and J

    X.-G. Huang and J. Liao,Axial current generation from electric field: Chiral electric separation effect,Physical Review Letters110(2013), no. 23 232302

    2013

  30. [30]

    Pu, S.-Y

    S. Pu, S.-Y. Wu, and D.-L. Yang,Holographic chiral electric separation effect,Physical Review D89(2014), no. 8 085024

    2014

  31. [31]

    Pu, S.-Y

    S. Pu, S.-Y. Wu, and D.-L. Yang,Chiral hall effect and chiral electric waves,Physical Review D91(2015), no. 2 025011

    2015

  32. [32]

    Jiang, X.-G

    Y. Jiang, X.-G. Huang, and J. Liao,Chiral electric separation effect in the quark-gluon plasma, Physical Review D91(2015), no. 4 045001

    2015

  33. [33]

    Satow,Nonlinear electromagnetic response in quark-gluon plasma,Physical Review D90 (2014), no

    D. Satow,Nonlinear electromagnetic response in quark-gluon plasma,Physical Review D90 (2014), no. 3 034018

    2014

  34. [34]

    J.-W. Chen, T. Ishii, S. Pu, and N. Yamamoto,Nonlinear chiral transport phenomena, Physical Review D93(2016), no. 12 125023

    2016

  35. [35]

    Ebihara, K

    S. Ebihara, K. Fukushima, and S. Pu,Boost invariant formulation of the chiral kinetic theory, Physical Review D96(2017), no. 1 016016. – 49 –

    2017

  36. [36]

    M. A. Stephanov and Y. Yin,Chiral kinetic theory,Physical Review Letters109(2012), no. 16 162001

    2012

  37. [37]

    D. T. Son and N. Yamamoto,Kinetic theory with berry curvature from quantum field theories, Physical Review D87(2013), no. 8 085016

    2013

  38. [38]

    Hidaka, S

    Y. Hidaka, S. Pu, and D.-L. Yang,Non-equilibrium quantum transport of chiral fluids from kinetic theory,Nuclear Physics A982(2019) 547–550

    2019

  39. [39]

    Huang, S

    A. Huang, S. Shi, Y. Jiang, J. Liao, and P. Zhuang,Complete and consistent chiral transport from wigner function formalism,Physical Review D98(2018), no. 3 036010

    2018

  40. [40]

    Gao, Z.-T

    J.-H. Gao, Z.-T. Liang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang,Disentangling covariant wigner functions for chiral fermions,Physical Review D98(2018), no. 3 036019

    2018

  41. [41]

    Liu, L.-L

    Y.-C. Liu, L.-L. Gao, K. Mameda, and X.-G. Huang,Chiral kinetic theory in curved spacetime,Physical Review D99(2019), no. 8 085014

    2019

  42. [42]

    Lin and A

    S. Lin and A. Shukla,Chiral kinetic theory from effective field theory revisited,Journal of High Energy Physics2019(2019), no. 6 060

    2019

  43. [43]

    Lin and L

    S. Lin and L. Yang,Chiral kinetic theory from landau level basis,Physical Review D101 (2020), no. 3 034006

    2020

  44. [44]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa,Real-time dynamics of the chiral magnetic effect,Physical Review Letters104(2010), no. 21 212001

    2010

  45. [45]

    Copinger, K

    P. Copinger, K. Fukushima, and S. Pu,Axial ward identity and the schwinger mechanism – applications to the real-time chiral magnetic effect and condensates,Physical Review Letters 121(2018), no. 26 261602

    2018

  46. [46]

    Sheng, R.-H

    X.-L. Sheng, R.-H. Fang, Q. Wang, and D. H. Rischke,Wigner function and pair production in parallel electric and magnetic fields,Physical Review D99(2019), no. 5 056004

    2019

  47. [47]

    Feng, D.-F

    B. Feng, D.-F. Hou, H. Liu, H.-c. Ren, P.-P. Wu, and Y. Wu,Chiral magnetic effect in a lattice model,Physical Review D95(2017), no. 11 114023

    2017

  48. [48]

    Wu, D.-F

    Y. Wu, D.-F. Hou, and H.-c. Ren,Field theoretic perspectives of the wigner function formulation of the chiral magnetic effect,Physical Review D96(2017), no. 9 096015

    2017

  49. [49]

    Lin and L

    S. Lin and L. Yang,Mass correction to chiral vortical effect and chiral separation effect, Physical Review D98(2018), no. 11 114022

    2018

  50. [50]

    Horvath, D.-F

    M. Horvath, D.-F. Hou, J. Liao, and H.-c. Ren,Chiral magnetic response to arbitrary axial imbalance,Physical Review D101(2020), no. 7 076026

    2020

  51. [51]

    Feng, D.-F

    B. Feng, D.-F. Hou, and H.-c. Ren,Qed radiative corrections to chiral magnetic effect, Physical Review D99(2019), no. 3 036010

    2019

  52. [52]

    Hou and S

    D.-F. Hou and S. Lin,Fluctuation and dissipation of axial charge from massive quarks, Physical Review D98(2018), no. 5 054014

    2018

  53. [53]

    S. Lin, L. Yan, and G.-R. Liang,Axial charge fluctuation and chiral magnetic effect from stochastic hydrodynamics,Physical Review C98(2018), no. 1 014903

    2018

  54. [54]

    Y. Sun, C. M. Ko, and F. Li,Anomalous transport model study of chiral magnetic effects in heavy ion collisions,Physical Review C94(2016), no. 4 045204

    2016

  55. [55]

    Sun and C

    Y. Sun and C. M. Ko,Chiral vortical and magnetic effects in the anomalous transport model, Physical Review C95(2017), no. 3 034909. – 50 –

    2017

  56. [56]

    Sun and C

    Y. Sun and C. M. Ko,Λhyperon polarization in relativistic heavy ion collisions from a chiral kinetic approach,Physical Review C96(2017), no. 2 024906

    2017

  57. [57]

    Sun and C

    Y. Sun and C. M. Ko,Chiral kinetic approach to the chiral magnetic effect in isobaric collisions, Physical Review C98(2018), no. 1 014911

    2018

  58. [58]

    Sun and C

    Y. Sun and C. M. Ko,Azimuthal angle dependence of the longitudinal spin polarization in relativistic heavy ion collisions,Physical Review C99(2019), no. 1 011903

    2019

  59. [59]

    Zhou and J

    W.-H. Zhou and J. Xu,Simulating the chiral magnetic wave in a box system,Physical Review C98(2018), no. 4 044904

    2018

  60. [60]

    Zhou and J

    W.-H. Zhou and J. Xu,Simulating chiral anomalies with spin dynamics,Physics Letters B 798(2019) 134932

    2019

  61. [61]

    S. Y. F. Liu, Y. Sun, and C. M. Ko,Spin polarizations in a covariant angular-momentum-conserved chiral transport model,Physical Review Letters125(2020), no. 6 062301

    2020

  62. [62]

    Becattini,Spin and polarization: a new direction in relativistic heavy ion physics, Reports on Progress in Physics85(2022), no

    F. Becattini,Spin and polarization: a new direction in relativistic heavy ion physics, Reports on Progress in Physics85(2022), no. 12 122301

    2022

  63. [63]

    Florkowski, B

    W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, and E. Speranza,Relativistic fluid dynamics with spin, Physical Review C97(2018), no. 4 041901(R)

    2018

  64. [64]

    Montenegro, L

    D. Montenegro, L. Tinti, and G. Torrieri,Linear response theory and effective action of relativistic hydrodynamics with spin,Physical Review D102(2020), no. 3 036007

    2020

  65. [65]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, and A. Palermo,Local polarization and isothermal local equilibrium in relativistic heavy ion collisions,Physical Review Letters127(2021), no. 27 272302

    2021

  66. [66]

    Weickgenannt, E

    N. Weickgenannt, E. Speranza, X.-L. Sheng, Q. Wang, and D. H. Rischke,Generating spin polarization from vorticity through nonlocal collisions,Physical Review Letters127(2021), no. 5 052301

    2021

  67. [67]

    B. Fu, S. Y. F. Liu, L. Pang, H. Song, and Y. Yin,Shear-induced spin polarization in heavy-ion collisions,Physical Review Letters127(2021), no. 14 142301

    2021

  68. [68]

    Weickgenannt, D

    N. Weickgenannt, D. Wagner, E. Speranza, and D. H. Rischke,Relativistic dissipative spin hydrodynamics from kinetic theory with a nonlocal collision term,Physical Review D106 (2022), no. 9 L091901

    2022

  69. [69]

    Weickgenannt,Linearly stable and causal relativistic first-order spin hydrodynamics, Physical Review D108(2023), no

    N. Weickgenannt,Linearly stable and causal relativistic first-order spin hydrodynamics, Physical Review D108(2023), no. 7 076011

    2023

  70. [70]

    Biswas, A

    R. Biswas, A. Daher, A. Das, W. Florkowski, and R. Ryblewski,Relativistic second-order spin hydrodynamics: An entropy-current analysis,Physical Review D108(2023), no. 1 014024

    2023

  71. [71]

    D. She, A. Huang, D. Hou, and J. Liao,Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics with angular momentum, Science Bulletin67(2022), no. 22 2265–2268

    2022

  72. [72]

    She, Y.-W

    D. She, Y.-W. Qiu, and D. Hou,Relativistic second-order spin hydrodynamics: A kubo-type formulation for the quark-gluon plasma,Physical Review D111(2025), no. 3 036027

    2025

  73. [73]

    She, Y.-W

    D. She, Y.-W. Qiu, Z.-F. Jiang, and D. Hou,Generalized relativistic second-order spin hydrodynamics from zubarev’s nonequilibrium statistical operator,Physical Review D112 (2025), no. 9 096013. – 51 –

    2025

  74. [74]

    V. Roy, S. Pu, L. Rezzolla, and D. H. Rischke,Analytic bjorken flow in one-dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamics,Physics Letters B750(2015) 45–52

    2015

  75. [75]

    S. Pu, V. Roy, L. Rezzolla, and D. H. Rischke,Bjorken flow in one-dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamics with magnetization,Physical Review D93(2016), no. 7 074022

    2016

  76. [76]

    Pu and D.-L

    S. Pu and D.-L. Yang,Transverse flow induced by inhomogeneous magnetic fields in the bjorken expansion,Physical Review D93(2016), no. 5 054042

    2016

  77. [77]

    Pu and D.-L

    S. Pu and D.-L. Yang,Analytic solutions of transverse magneto-hydrodynamics under bjorken expansion,EPJ Web of Conferences137(2017) 13021

    2017

  78. [78]

    Siddique, R.-j

    I. Siddique, R.-j. Wang, S. Pu, and Q. Wang,Anomalous magnetohydrodynamics with longitudinal boost invariance and chiral magnetic effect,Physical Review D99(2019), no. 11 114029

    2019

  79. [79]

    D. She, Z. F. Jiang, D. Hou, and C. B. Yang,1+1 dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamics with longitudinal acceleration,Physical Review D100(2019), no. 11 116014

    2019

  80. [80]

    Haddadi Moghaddam, W

    M. Haddadi Moghaddam, W. M. Alberico, D. She, A. F. Kord, and B. Azadegan, Accelerating longitudinal expansion of resistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions,Physical Review D102(2020), no. 1 014017

    2020

Showing first 80 references.