Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 269 references

Comparisons of triple-differential cross sections for quasielastic-like $\nu_\mu$-hydrocarbon interactions using $\langle E_\nu\rangle \sim$ 3~GeV versus $\sim$ 6~GeV beams in MINERvA

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Data from two neutrino beam energies in MINERvA indicate models overestimate final state interactions of protons and charged pions in quasielastic-like events.

desk verdict MINERvA's side-by-side triple-differential comparison at two beam energies is new data for model tuning, but the FSI overestimation claim needs explicit checks that the two exposures are consistent at the level of the observed discrepancies. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.00745 v1 pith:PT3BMWKQ submitted 2026-05-30 hep-ex

D. Ruterbories , S. Akhter , Z. Ahmad Dar , M. Sajjad Athar , M. Betancourt , S. Boyd , H. da Motta , J. Felix
show 35 more authors
L. Fields R. Fine A.M. Gago H. Gallagher P.K.Gaur S.M. Gilligan R. Gran E.Granados D.A. Harris A.L. Hart A. Klustová M. Kordosky D. Last Z. Lin A. Lozano S. Manly W.A. Mann C. Mauger K.S. McFarland M. Mehmood O. Moreno J.G. Morfín J.K. Nelson C. Nguyen V. Paolone G.N. Perdue C. Pernas M.A. Ramírez R.D. Ransome N. Roy H. Schellman C.J. Solano Salinas N.H. Vaughan A.V. Waldron L. Zazueta (the MINERvA collaboration)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords neutrinointeractionsquasielasticscatteringfinalstatecrosssectionsnucleareffectsMINERvAmuonhydrocarbontarget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper compares triple-differential cross sections for quasielastic-like muon neutrino scattering on hydrocarbon targets using two MINERvA exposures with different average neutrino energies, one near 3 GeV and one near 6 GeV. This comparison is designed to isolate deviations from free-nucleon scattering that come from nuclear medium effects, multinucleon processes, and final state interactions. By examining the same observables in muon and proton kinematics across both datasets, the analysis tests how well current models describe these effects and support energy reconstruction in oscillation experiments. Observed mismatches between data and predictions point specifically to overestimates of final state interactions for protons and charged pions.

What carries the argument

Triple-differential cross sections in muon and proton kinematics compared across two neutrino beam spectra with different peak energies.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that proton and charged pion absorption or rescattering rates in the nucleus match model predictions exactly, without needing adjustment, would contradict the claim of overestimates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Comparisons of differential cross sections in muon and proton kinematics for these two exposures probe deviations from free-neutron scattering that arise from the processes involving the nuclear medium, and provide a test of neutrino interaction models used to infer neutrino energies in oscillation experiments. Discrepancies are observed between the data and predictions that point to overestimates of the final state interactions of both protons and charged pions in quasielastic-like events.

Load-bearing premise

Differences observed between the two beam exposures arise primarily from nuclear medium effects and final state interactions rather than from unaccounted differences in beam flux, detector response, or analysis selections between the two data sets.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nuclear medium processes produce measurable deviations from free-nucleon kinematics in quasielastic-like events at few-GeV energies.
  • Neutrino interaction models require reduced final state interaction strengths for protons and pions to match the observed cross sections.
  • Energy reconstruction methods in oscillation experiments that rely on these models will carry systematic biases from the overestimated interactions.
  • The energy dependence between the 3 GeV and 6 GeV exposures constrains how nuclear effects scale with neutrino energy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If final state interactions are overestimated across models, similar discrepancies may appear in other nuclei or at higher energies where pion production grows.
  • The two-energy comparison provides a lever arm that could be used to separate initial-state nuclear effects from final-state rescattering in future analyses.
  • Adjusting interaction models based on these data would alter predicted event rates and backgrounds in long-baseline oscillation detectors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript compares triple-differential cross sections for quasielastic-like charged-current ν_μ interactions on hydrocarbon targets in MINERvA, using two wideband beams with ⟨E_ν⟩ ≈ 3 GeV and ≈ 6 GeV. It reports discrepancies between data and model predictions that are interpreted as evidence for overestimates of final-state interactions (FSI) involving protons and charged pions.

Significance. If the attribution of discrepancies to energy-dependent nuclear effects holds after accounting for experimental differences, the result supplies useful constraints on neutrino interaction models employed in oscillation analyses. The dual-beam-energy design is a strength for isolating nuclear-medium contributions from free-nucleon scattering.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results sections: the central claim that observed data-prediction mismatches arise from FSI overestimates (rather than residual differences between exposures) requires explicit demonstration that beam-flux modeling, detector-response corrections, and analysis selections are consistent between the two datasets at a level smaller than the reported discrepancies. No such quantification is described.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript provides no information on how systematic uncertainties, background subtraction, or efficiency corrections are evaluated or compared across the two beam exposures; without these details the strength of the FSI interpretation cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise kinematic ranges and binning choices used for the triple-differential cross sections to allow direct comparison with other experiments.
  2. Ensure all model implementations (including specific FSI treatments) are referenced with version numbers or parameter settings in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions that will be incorporated in the next version of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results sections: the central claim that observed data-prediction mismatches arise from FSI overestimates (rather than residual differences between exposures) requires explicit demonstration that beam-flux modeling, detector-response corrections, and analysis selections are consistent between the two datasets at a level smaller than the reported discrepancies. No such quantification is described.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the manuscript does not include an explicit quantitative comparison demonstrating that differences in beam-flux modeling, detector-response corrections, and analysis selections between the two exposures are smaller than the reported discrepancies. We will add a new subsection to the results section that provides this side-by-side quantification, including estimates of the residual differences in each category and a direct comparison to the size of the observed data-model discrepancies. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript provides no information on how systematic uncertainties, background subtraction, or efficiency corrections are evaluated or compared across the two beam exposures; without these details the strength of the FSI interpretation cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript lacks an explicit comparison of how systematic uncertainties, background subtraction, and efficiency corrections are evaluated and compared between the two beam exposures. We will revise the methods and results sections to include this information, with a focus on any differences in the treatment of these elements across the datasets and their potential impact on the FSI interpretation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: pure experimental measurement

full rationale

This is a direct experimental measurement of triple-differential cross sections in two neutrino beam exposures, with results compared to external model predictions. No derivation, ansatz, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain reduces any central claim to the paper's own inputs by construction. The analysis stands on measured data and independent models.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to standard assumptions of neutrino-nucleus scattering; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the given text.

assumptions (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of the Standard Model and nuclear physics models for neutrino-nucleus interactions
    The paper compares data to predictions from established models without detailing deviations from those assumptions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comparisons of triple-differential cross sections for quasielastic-like $\nu_\mu$-hydrocarbon interactions using $\langle E_\nu\rangle \sim$ 3~GeV versus $\sim$ 6~GeV beams in MINERvA." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PT3BMWKQ

@misc{pith2026260600745,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comparisons of triple-differential cross sections for quasielastic-like $\nu_\mu$-hydrocarbon interactions using $\langle E_\nu\rangle \sim$ 3~GeV versus $\sim$ 6~GeV beams in MINERvA},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PT3BMWKQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.00745}
}
read the original abstract

Neutrino charged-current quasielastic-like scattering, a reaction category extensively used in neutrino oscillation measurements, receives contributions from single nucleon knockout processes, multinucleon processes, and inelastic scattering with subsequent rescattering or absorption in the nucleus to produce only nucleons in the final state. In this article, comparisons are presented of the same measurement in two different wideband neutrino beams: one beam peaks near 3 GeV with few neutrinos above 6 GeV; the other peaks near 6 GeV with few neutrinos above 10 GeV. Comparisons of differential cross sections in muon and proton kinematics for these two exposures probe deviations from free-neutron scattering that arise from the processes involving the nuclear medium, and provide a test of neutrino interaction models used to infer neutrino energies in oscillation experiments. Discrepancies are observed between the data and predictions that point to overestimates of the final state interactions of both protons and charged pions in quasielastic-like events.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.00745 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Medium and Low Energy fluxes in the neutrino fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Event distributions in data and prediction after [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Fractional uncertainty on the cross section in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (48 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Cross section in the Low (top) and Medium (bottom) Energy beam as a function of the sum of proton kinetic energies, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Average recoil for the events after background sub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Cross Sections (top) and Ratios between the cross sections and MINERvA’s Tune to GENIE (bottom) as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Ratios of both MINERvA data and alternate gen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Ratio of LE/ME cross section ratio to the simulation’s ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Ratio of LE/ME cross section ratio in the data to GENIE3’s ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 110
Figure 110. Figure 110: FIG. 110. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_110.png]
Figure 111
Figure 111. Figure 111: FIG. 111. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_111.png]
Figure 112
Figure 112. Figure 112: FIG. 112. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_112.png]
Figure 113
Figure 113. Figure 113: FIG. 113. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_113.png]
Figure 114
Figure 114. Figure 114: FIG. 114. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_114.png]
Figure 115
Figure 115. Figure 115: FIG. 115. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_115.png]
Figure 116
Figure 116. Figure 116: FIG. 116. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_116.png]
Figure 117
Figure 117. Figure 117: FIG. 117. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_117.png]
Figure 118
Figure 118. Figure 118: FIG. 118. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_118.png]
Figure 119
Figure 119. Figure 119: FIG. 119. Cross Sections as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_119.png]
Figure 120
Figure 120. Figure 120: FIG. 120. Double ratio of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_120.png]
Figure 121
Figure 121. Figure 121: FIG. 121. Double ratio of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_121.png]
Figure 122
Figure 122. Figure 122: FIG. 122. Double ratio of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_122.png]
Figure 123
Figure 123. Figure 123: FIG. 123. Double ratio of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_123.png]
Figure 124
Figure 124. Figure 124: FIG. 124. Double ratio of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_124.png]
Figure 125
Figure 125. Figure 125: FIG. 125. Data to simulation ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_125.png]
Figure 126
Figure 126. Figure 126: FIG. 126. Data to simulation ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_126.png]
Figure 127
Figure 127. Figure 127: FIG. 127. Data to simulation ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_127.png]
Figure 128
Figure 128. Figure 128: FIG. 128. Data to simulation ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_128.png]
Figure 129
Figure 129. Figure 129: FIG. 129. Data to simulation ratio as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_129.png]
Figure 130
Figure 130. Figure 130: FIG. 130. Top (Low Energy), Middle (Medium Energy): Measured cross sections divided by the MINERvA tune, and other [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_130.png]
Figure 131
Figure 131. Figure 131: FIG. 131. Top (Low Energy), Middle (Medium Energy): Measured cross sections divided by the MINERvA tune, and other [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_131.png]
Figure 132
Figure 132. Figure 132: FIG. 132. Top (Low Energy), Middle (Medium Energy): Measured cross sections divided by the MINERvA tune, and other [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_132.png]
Figure 133
Figure 133. Figure 133: FIG. 133. Top (Low Energy), Middle (Medium Energy): Measured cross sections divided by the MINERvA tune, and other [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_133.png]
Figure 134
Figure 134. Figure 134: FIG. 134. Top (Low Energy), Middle (Medium Energy): Measured cross sections divided by the MINERvA tune, and other [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_134.png]
Figure 149
Figure 149. Figure 149: FIG. 149. Pz bins 1 (top), 2(middle) and 3 (bottom) comparing NuWro SF against GENIE 10a. The double ratios are also [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_149.png]
Figure 150
Figure 150. Figure 150: FIG. 150. Pz bins 4 (top) and 5(bottom) comparing NuWro SF against GENIE 10a. The double ratios are also shown for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_150.png]
Figure 151
Figure 151. Figure 151: FIG. 151. Event distributions in data and prediction after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_151.png]
Figure 152
Figure 152. Figure 152: FIG. 152. Event distributions in data and prediction after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_152.png]
Figure 153
Figure 153. Figure 153: FIG. 153. Event distributions in data and prediction after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_153.png]
Figure 154
Figure 154. Figure 154: FIG. 154. Event distributions in data and prediction after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_154.png]
Figure 155
Figure 155. Figure 155: FIG. 155. Event distributions in data and prediction after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_155.png]
Figure 156
Figure 156. Figure 156: FIG. 156. Ratios of measured to predicted event distributions after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_156.png]
Figure 157
Figure 157. Figure 157: FIG. 157. Ratios of measured to predicted event distributions after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_157.png]
Figure 158
Figure 158. Figure 158: FIG. 158. Ratios of measured to predicted event distributions after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_158.png]
Figure 159
Figure 159. Figure 159: FIG. 159. Ratios of measured to predicted event distributions after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_159.png]
Figure 160
Figure 160. Figure 160: FIG. 160. Ratios of measured to predicted event distributions after the background fits described in the text, for both the Low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_160.png]
Figure 161
Figure 161. Figure 161: FIG. 161. Double Ratios to GENIE 02a for all momentum bins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_161.png]
Figure 162
Figure 162. Figure 162: FIG. 162. Double Ratios to GENIE 02b for all momentum bins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_162.png]
Figure 163
Figure 163. Figure 163: FIG. 163. Double Ratios to NEUT with a Spectral Function Model for all momentum bins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_163.png]
Figure 164
Figure 164. Figure 164: FIG. 164. Double Ratios to NuWro with a Spectral Function Model for all momentum bins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_164.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

269 extracted references · 246 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    thesis, Nevis Labs, Columbia U

    Seligman, William Glenn. A Next-to-Leading Order QCD Analysis of Neutrino - Iron Structure Functions at the Tevatron. 1997. doi:10.2172/1421736

    work page doi:10.2172/1421736 1997

  2. [2]

    Neutrino and Antineutrino Inclusive Charged-current Cross Section Measurements with the MINOS Near Detector

    Adamson, P. and others. Neutrino and Antineutrino Inclusive Charged-current Cross Section Measurements with the MINOS Near Detector. Phys. Rev. D. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.072002. arXiv:0910.2201

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.072002 2010

  3. [3]

    A Precise Measurement of the Muon Neutrino-Nucleon Inclusive Charged Current Cross-Section off an Isoscalar Target in the Energy Range 2.5 < E_\nu < 40 GeV by NOMAD

    Wu, Q. and others. A Precise measurement of the muon neutrino-nucleon inclusive charged current cross-section off an isoscalar target in the energy range 2.5 < E(nu) < 40-GeV by NOMAD. Phys. Lett. B. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.027. arXiv:0711.1183

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.027 2008

  4. [4]

    Measurement of the antineutrino to neutrino charged-current interaction cross section ratio in MINERvA

    Ren, L. and others. Measurement of the antineutrino to neutrino charged-current interaction cross section ratio in MINERvA. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.019902, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.072009. arXiv:1701.04857

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.019902 2017

  5. [5]

    Measurements of the Inclusive Neutrino and Antineutrino Charged Current Cross Sections in MINERvA Using the Low-$\nu$ Flux Method

    Devan, J. and others. Measurements of the Inclusive Neutrino and Antineutrino Charged Current Cross Sections in MINERvA Using the Low- Flux Method. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.112007. arXiv:1610.04746

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.112007 2016

  6. [6]

    Measurement of inclusive double-differential $\nu_\mu$ charged-current cross section with improved acceptance in the T2K off-axis near detector

    Abe, K. and others. Measurement of inclusive double-differential _ charged-current cross section with improved acceptance in the T2K off-axis near detector. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.012004. arXiv:1801.05148

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.012004 2018

  7. [7]

    and others

    Abratenko, P. and others. First Measurement of Inclusive Muon Neutrino Charged Current Differential Cross Sections on Argon at E_ 0.8 GeV with the MicroBooNE Detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.131801. arXiv:1905.09694

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.131801 2019

  8. [8]

    Measurement of Neutrino Flux from Neutrino-Electron Elastic Scattering

    Park, J. and others. Measurement of Neutrino Flux from Neutrino-Electron Elastic Scattering. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.112007. arXiv:1512.07699

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.112007 2016

Show all 269 references
  1. [9]

    and others

    Valencia, E. and others. Constraint of the MINER A medium energy neutrino flux using neutrino-electron elastic scattering. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.092001. arXiv:1906.00111

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Harewood, L. A. and Gran, R. Elastic hadron-nucleus scattering in neutrino-nucleus reactions and transverse kinematics measurements. 2019. arXiv:1906.10576

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    and others

    Stowell, P. and others. Tuning the GENIE Pion Production Model with MINER A Data. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.072005. arXiv:1903.01558

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    and Sobczyk, Jan T

    Juszczak, Cezary and Nowak, Jaroslaw A. and Sobczyk, Jan T. Simulations from a new neutrino event generator. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2006.08.069. arXiv:hep-ph/0512365

    2006 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    and others

    Bercellie, A. and others. Simultaneous Measurement of Muon Neutrino Charged-Current Single + Production in CH, C, H2O, Fe, and Pb Targets in MINERvA. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.011801. arXiv:2209.07852

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Peele's Pertinent Puzzle

    Peelle, R.W. Peele's Pertinent Puzzle. informal Oak Ridge National Lab memorandum. 1987

    1987

  7. [15]

    and Cox, D.R

    Box, G.E.P. and Cox, D.R. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B (Methodological). 1964

    1964

  8. [17]

    Neutrino event generators, Proceedings of Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop: Batavia, IL, September 6-8, 2006

    Dytman, Steven. Neutrino event generators, Proceedings of Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop: Batavia, IL, September 6-8, 2006. AIP Conf. Proc. 2007. doi:10.1063/1.2720468

    2006 doi

  9. [19]

    and others

    Altinok, O. and others. Measurement of _ charged-current single ^ 0 production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.072003. arXiv:1708.03723

    2017 doi

  10. [20]

    and others

    Le, T. and others. Measurement of _ Charged-Current Single ^ - Production on Hydrocarbon in the Few-GeV Region using MINERvA. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.052008. arXiv:1906.08300

    2019 doi

  11. [21]

    McGivern, C. L. and others. Cross sections for _ and _ induced pion production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.052005. arXiv:1606.07127

    2016 doi arXiv

  12. [22]

    and others

    Betancourt, M. and others. Direct Measurement of Nuclear Dependence of Charged Current Quasielasticlike Neutrino Interactions Using MINER A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.082001. arXiv:1705.03791

    2017 doi arXiv

  13. [23]

    Rodrigues, P. A. and others. Identification of nuclear effects in neutrino-carbon interactions at low three-momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.071802. arXiv:1511.05944

    2016 doi

  14. [24]

    and Betancourt, Minerba and Gran, Richard and Hill, Richard J

    Meyer, Aaron S. and Betancourt, Minerba and Gran, Richard and Hill, Richard J. Deuterium target data for precision neutrino-nucleus cross sections. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.113015. arXiv:1603.03048

    2016 doi arXiv

  15. [25]

    Reanalysis of bubble chamber measurements of muon-neutrino induced single pion production

    Wilkinson, Callum and others. Reanalysis of bubble chamber measurements of muon-neutrino induced single pion production. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.112017. arXiv:1411.4482

    2014 doi arXiv

  16. [26]

    Constraining the GENIE model of neutrino-induced single pion production using reanalyzed bubble chamber data

    Rodrigues, Philip and Wilkinson, Callum and McFarland, Kevin. Constraining the GENIE model of neutrino-induced single pion production using reanalyzed bubble chamber data. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2016. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4314-3. arXiv:1601.01888

    2016 doi arXiv

  17. [27]

    and Hayato, Y

    Alvarez-Ruso, L. and Hayato, Y. and Nieves, J. Progress and open questions in the physics of neutrino cross sections at intermediate energies. New J. Phys. 2014. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/075015. arXiv:1403.2673

    2014 doi arXiv

  18. [28]

    Formaggio, J. A. and Zeller, G. P. From eV to EeV: Neutrino Cross Sections Across Energy Scales. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1307. arXiv:1305.7513

    2012 doi arXiv

  19. [29]

    and Garvey, G

    Gallagher, H. and Garvey, G. and Zeller, G. P. Neutrino-nucleus interactions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2011. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102010-130255

    2011 doi

  20. [31]

    Mishra, S. R. Talk presented at Workshop on Hadron Structure Functions and Parton Distributions. Proceedings of the Workshop on Hadron Structure Functions and Parton Distributions. 1990

    1990

  21. [32]

    Seligman , title = "

    W. Seligman , title = "

  22. [33]

    and Sarica, U

    Bodek, A. and Sarica, U. and Naples, D. and Ren, L. Methods to Determine Neutrino Flux at Low Energies:Investigation of the Low Method. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2012. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1973-6. arXiv:1201.3025

    2012 doi arXiv

  23. [34]

    Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Charged-Current Inclusive Cross Sections with the MINERvA Detector

    Devan, Joshua D. Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Charged-Current Inclusive Cross Sections with the MINERvA Detector. 2015. doi:10.2172/1248217

    2015 doi

  24. [35]

    J. Devan. Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Charged-Current Inclusive Cross Sections with the MINERvA Detector. 2016

    2016

  25. [36]

    and Jachowicz, N

    Pandey, V. and Jachowicz, N. and Van Cuyck, T. and Ryckebusch, J. and Martini, M. Low-energy excitations and quasielastic contribution to electron-nucleus and neutrino-nucleus scattering in the continuum random-phase approximation. Phys. Rev. C. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.0...

    2015 doi arXiv

  26. [37]

    and Martini, M

    Ericson, M. and Martini, M. Neutrino versus antineutrino cross sections and CP violation. Phys. Rev. C. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.035501. arXiv:1501.02442

    2015 doi arXiv

  27. [38]

    Neutrino-nucleus interaction models and their impact on oscillation analyses

    Coloma, Pilar and Huber, Patrick and Jen, Chun-Min and Mariani, Camillo. Neutrino-nucleus interaction models and their impact on oscillation analyses. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.073015. arXiv:1311.4506

    2014 doi arXiv

  28. [41]

    and Datta, M

    Tice, B.G. and Datta, M. and Mousseau, J. and others. Measurement Ratios of _ Charged-Current Cross Sections on C, Fe, and Pb to CH at Neutrino Energies 2-20 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.231801. arXiv:1403.2103

    2014 doi arXiv

  29. [42]

    and others

    Walton, T. and others. Measurement of muon plus proton final states in _ interactions on hydrocarbon at < E_ > = 4.2 GeV. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.071301. arXiv:1409.4497

    2015 doi arXiv

  30. [43]

    and others

    Eberly, B. and others. Charged pion production in _ interactions on hydrocarbon at E_ = 4.0 GeV. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.092008. arXiv:1406.6415

    2015 doi arXiv

  31. [44]

    and others

    Mislivec, A. and others. Measurement of total and differential cross sections of neutrino and antineutrino coherent ^ production on carbon. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.032014. arXiv:1711.01178

    2018 doi arXiv

  32. [45]

    and others

    Higuera, A. and others. Measurement of Coherent Production of ^ in Neutrino and Antineutrino Beams on Carbon from E_ of 1.5 to 20 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.261802. arXiv:1409.3835

    2014 doi arXiv

  33. [46]

    and others

    Aliaga, L. and others. Design, Calibration, and Performance of the MINERvA Detector. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2013.12.053. arXiv:1305.5199

    2014 doi arXiv

  34. [47]

    A Study of quasi-elastic muon neutrino and antineutrino scattering in the NOMAD experiment

    Lyubushkin, V and others. A Study of quasi-elastic muon neutrino and antineutrino scattering in the NOMAD experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2009. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1113-0. arXiv:0812.4543

    2009 doi arXiv

  35. [49]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. Measurement of the muon neutrino charged-current single ^+ production on hydrocarbon using the T2K off-axis near detector ND280. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.012007. arXiv:1909.03936

    2020 doi

  36. [50]

    and others

    Gran, R. and others. Measurement of the quasi-elastic axial vector mass in neutrino-oxygen interactions. Phys. Rev. D. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.052002. arXiv:hep-ex/0603034

    2006 doi arXiv

  37. [51]

    Measurement of the axial vector mass in neutrino-carbon interactions at K2K

    Espinal, X and Sanchez, F. Measurement of the axial vector mass in neutrino-carbon interactions at K2K. AIP Conf. Proc. 2007

    2007

  38. [54]

    GENIE implementation of IFIC Valencia model for QE-like 2p2h neutrino-nucleus cross section

    Schwehr, Jackie and Cherdack, Dan and Gran, Rik. GENIE implementation of IFIC Valencia model for QE-like 2p2h neutrino-nucleus cross section. 2016. arXiv:1601.02038

    2016 arXiv

  39. [55]

    and Nieves, J

    Gran, R. and Nieves, J. and Sanchez, F. and Vicente Vacas, M.J. Neutrino-nucleus quasi-elastic and 2p2h interactions up to 10 GeV. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.113007. arXiv:1307.8105

    2013 doi arXiv

  40. [56]

    and Ruiz Simo, I

    Nieves, J. and Ruiz Simo, I. and Vicente Vacas, M.J. Inclusive Charged--Current Neutrino--Nucleus Reactions. Phys. Rev. C. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.045501. arXiv:1102.2777

    2011 doi arXiv

  41. [57]

    and Ruiz Simo, I

    Nieves, J. and Ruiz Simo, I. and Vicente Vacas, M.J. The nucleon axial mass and the MiniBooNE Quasielastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering problem. Phys. Lett. B. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.11.061. arXiv:1106.5374

    2012 doi arXiv

  42. [58]

    and Jachowicz, N

    Van Cuyck, T. and Jachowicz, N. and González-Jiménez, R. and Ryckebusch, J. and Van Dessel, N. Seagull and pion-in-flight currents in neutrino-induced 1N and 2N knockout. Phys. Rev. C. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054611. arXiv:1702.06402

    2017 doi arXiv

  43. [59]

    and Megias, G

    Gonzaléz-Jiménez, R. and Megias, G. D. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. Extensions of Superscaling from Relativistic Mean Field Theory: the SuSAv2 Model. Phys. Rev. C. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.035501. arXiv:1407.8346

    2014 doi arXiv

  44. [60]

    Amaro, Jose Enrique and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. and Molinari, A. and Sick, I. Using electron scattering superscaling to predict charge-changing neutrino cross sections in nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 2005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.015501. arXiv:nucl-th/0409078

    2005 doi arXiv

  45. [61]

    and Amaro, Jose Enrique and Valverde, M

    Nieves, J. and Amaro, Jose Enrique and Valverde, M. Inclusive quasi-elastic neutrino reactions. Phys. Rev. C. 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.055503, 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.019902. arXiv:nucl-th/0408005

    2004 doi arXiv

  46. [62]

    and Ericson, M

    Martini, M. and Ericson, M. and Chanfray, G. and Marteau, J. A Unified approach for nucleon knock-out, coherent and incoherent pion production in neutrino interactions with nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.065501. arXiv:0910.2622

    2009 doi arXiv

  47. [63]

    In medium dispersion relation effects in nuclear inclusive reactions at intermediate and low energies

    Nieves, Juan and Sobczyk, Joanna Ewa. In medium dispersion relation effects in nuclear inclusive reactions at intermediate and low energies. 2017. arXiv:1701.03628

    2017 arXiv

  48. [64]

    and Amaro, Jose Enrique and Nieves, J

    Valverde, M. and Amaro, Jose Enrique and Nieves, J. Theoretical uncertainties on quasielastic charged-current neutrino-nucleus cross sections. Phys. Lett. B. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.053. arXiv:hep-ph/0604042

    2006 doi arXiv

  49. [65]

    Model Uncertainties for Valencia RPA Effect for MINERvA

    Gran, Richard. Model Uncertainties for Valencia RPA Effect for MINERvA. 2017. arXiv:1705.02932

    2017 arXiv

  50. [66]

    and Mosel, U

    Gallmeister, K. and Mosel, U. and Weil, J. Neutrino-Induced Reactions on Nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.035502. arXiv:1605.09391

    2016 doi arXiv

  51. [67]

    and Sobczyk, J.T

    Golan, T. and Sobczyk, J.T. and Zmuda, J. NuWro: the Wroclaw Monte Carlo Generator of Neutrino Interactions. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2012.09.136

    2012 doi

  52. [68]

    Final State Interactions Effects in Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions

    Golan, Tomasz and Juszczak, Cezary and Sobczyk, Jan T. Final State Interactions Effects in Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions. Phys. Rev. C. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.015505. arXiv:1202.4197

    2012 doi arXiv

  53. [70]

    Multinucleon ejection model for Meson Exchange Current neutrino interactions

    Sobczyk, Jan T. Multinucleon ejection model for Meson Exchange Current neutrino interactions. Phys. Rev. C. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.015504. arXiv:1201.3673

    2012 doi arXiv

  54. [71]

    Modeling nuclear effects in neutrino interactions in 1-GeV region

    Sobczyk, Jan T. Modeling nuclear effects in neutrino interactions in 1-GeV region. 2003. arXiv:nucl-th/0307047

    2003 arXiv

  55. [72]

    and Sanchez, F

    Nieves, J. and Sanchez, F. and Ruiz Simo, I. and Vicente Vacas, M.J. Neutrino Energy Reconstruction and the Shape of the CCQE-like Total Cross Section. Phys. Rev. D. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.113008. arXiv:1204.5404

    2012 doi arXiv

  56. [73]

    and Jachowicz, N

    Martini, M. and Jachowicz, N. and Ericson, M. and Pandey, V. and Van Cuyck, T. and Van Dessel, N. Electron-neutrino scattering off nuclei from two different theoretical perspectives. Phys. Rev. C. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.015501. arXiv:1602.00230

    2016 doi arXiv

  57. [74]

    and Ericson, M

    Martini, M. and Ericson, M. and Chanfray, G. Energy reconstruction effects in neutrino oscillation experiments and implications for the analysis. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.013009. arXiv:1211.1523

    2013 doi arXiv

  58. [75]

    and Gran, R

    Nieves, J. and Gran, R. and Simo, I. Ruiz and Sanchez, F and Vacas, M. J. Vicente. Neutrino-nucleus CCQE-like scattering. proceedings of the International Conference on High Energy Physics 2014 (ICHEP 2014) Valencia, Spain, July 2-9, 2014. 2014. arXiv:1411.7821

    2014 arXiv

  59. [76]

    Single pion production in neutrino-nucleon Interactions

    Kabirnezhad, Monireh. Single pion production in neutrino-nucleon Interactions. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.013002. arXiv:1711.02403

    2018 doi

  60. [77]

    Energy reconstruction in the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment

    Mosel, Ulrich and Lalakulich, Olga and Gallmeister, Kai. Energy reconstruction in the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.151802. arXiv:1311.7288

    2014 doi arXiv

  61. [78]

    Meson Exchange Current (MEC) Models in Neutrino Interaction Generators, proceedings of NuInt12 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Katori, Teppei. Meson Exchange Current (MEC) Models in Neutrino Interaction Generators, proceedings of NuInt12 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. AIP Conf.Proc. 2015. doi:10.1063/1.4919465. arXiv:1304.6014

    2015 doi arXiv

  62. [79]

    Lightbody, J. W. and O'Connell, J. S. Modeling single arm electron scattering and nucleon production from nuclei by GeV electrons. Computers in Physics. 1988

    1988

  63. [80]

    and Nardi, M

    De Pace, A. and Nardi, M. and Alberico, W. M. and Donnelly, T. W. and Molinari, A. The 2p - 2h electromagnetic response in the quasielastic peak and beyond. Nucl. Phys. A. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01625-7. arXiv:nucl-th/0304084

    2003 doi arXiv

  64. [81]

    and Albertus, C

    Ruiz Simo, I. and Albertus, C. and Amaro, J. E. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. Relativistic effects in two-particle emission for electron and neutrino reactions. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.033012. arXiv:1405.4280

    2014 doi arXiv

  65. [82]

    Ruiz and Albertus, C

    Simo, I. Ruiz and Albertus, C. and Amaro, J. E. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. Angular distribution in two-particle emission induced by neutrinos and electrons. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.053010. arXiv:1407.7122

    2014 doi arXiv

  66. [83]

    Effects of the nuclear correlations on the neutrino oxygen interactions

    Marteau, J. Effects of the nuclear correlations on the neutrino oxygen interactions. Eur. Phys. J. A. 1999. doi:10.1007/s100500050274. arXiv:hep-ph/9902210

    1999 doi arXiv

  67. [84]

    and Budd, H

    Bodek, A. and Budd, H. S. and Christy, M. E. Neutrino Quasielastic Scattering on Nuclear Targets: Parametrizing Transverse Enhancement (Meson Exchange Currents). Eur. Phys. J. C. 2011. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1726-y. arXiv:1106.0340

    2011 doi arXiv

  68. [85]

    Coherent pi0 Production in Neutrino Reactions

    Rein, Dieter and Sehgal, Lalit M. Coherent pi0 Production in Neutrino Reactions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1983. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90090-1

    1983 doi

  69. [86]

    and Sehgal, L.M

    Rein, D. and Sehgal, L.M. PCAC and the Deficit of Forward Muons in pi+ Production by Neutrinos. Phys. Lett. B. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.10.025. arXiv:hep-ph/0606185

    2007 doi arXiv

  70. [87]

    and Schalla, Dario

    Paschos, E.A. and Schalla, Dario. Coherent Pion Production by Neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.033005. arXiv:0903.0451

    2009 doi arXiv

  71. [88]

    and Sehgal, L.M

    Berger, Ch. and Sehgal, L.M. PCAC and coherent pion production by low energy neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.053003. arXiv:0812.2653

    2009 doi arXiv

  72. [89]

    and Kopeliovich, B.Z

    Belkov, A.A. and Kopeliovich, B.Z. Adler Relation and Neutrino Production of Single Hadrons. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 1987

    1987

  73. [90]

    and Komachenko, Yu

    Gershtein, S.S. and Komachenko, Yu. Ya. and Khlopov, M. Yu. and. Fast Pion Production in Exclusive Neutrino Processes. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 1980

    1980

  74. [91]

    Tests of the Conserved Vector Current and Partially Conserved Axial-Vector Current Hypotheses in High-Energy Neutrino Reactions

    Adler, Stephen L. Tests of the Conserved Vector Current and Partially Conserved Axial-Vector Current Hypotheses in High-Energy Neutrino Reactions. Phys. Rev. 1964. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.135.B963

    1964 doi

  75. [92]

    and Stodolsky, Leo

    Piketty, C.A. and Stodolsky, Leo. Diffraction model of high-energy leptonic interactions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1970. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90082-9

    1970 doi

  76. [93]

    Coherent Meson Production as a Test for Neutral Weak Currents of Exotic Space-time Structure

    Lackner, K.S. Coherent Meson Production as a Test for Neutral Weak Currents of Exotic Space-time Structure. Nucl. Phys. B. 1979. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90615-1

    1979 doi

  77. [94]

    and Paschos, E.A

    Higuera, A. and Paschos, E.A. Angular Dependence of Coherent Pion Production by Neutrinos. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 2014. doi:10.1140/epjp/i2014-14043-1. arXiv:1311.5149

    2014 doi arXiv

  78. [95]

    and Geng, L.S

    Alvarez-Ruso, L. and Geng, L.S. and Hirenzaki, S. and Vicente Vacas, M.J. Charged current neutrino induced coherent pion production. Phys. Rev. C. 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.055501, 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.019906. arXiv:nucl-th/0701098

    2007 doi arXiv

  79. [96]

    and Sajjad Athar, M

    Singh, S.K. and Sajjad Athar, M. and Ahmad, S. Nuclear effects in neutrino induced coherent pion production at K2K and MiniBooNE. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.241801

    2006 doi

  80. [97]

    and Hernandez, E

    Amaro, J.E. and Hernandez, E. and Nieves, J. and Valverde, M. Theoretical study of neutrino-induced coherent pion production off nuclei at T2K and MiniBooNE energies. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.013002. arXiv:0811.1421

    2009 doi arXiv

  81. [98]

    and Nieves, J

    Hernandez, E. and Nieves, J. and Vicente-Vacas, M.J. Neutrino Induced Coherent Pion Production off Nuclei and PCAC. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.013003. arXiv:0903.5285

    2009 doi arXiv

  82. [99]

    and Mosel, U

    Leitner, T. and Mosel, U. and Winkelmann, S. Neutrino-induced coherent pion production off nuclei reexamined. Phys. Rev. C. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.057601. arXiv:0901.2837

    2009 doi arXiv

  83. [100]

    and others

    Acciarri, R. and others. First Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Coherent Charged Pion Production on Argon. 2014. arXiv:1408.0598

    2014 arXiv

  84. [101]

    and others

    Allport, P.P. and others. Coherent Production of ^+ Mesons in Neutrino - Neon Interactions. Z. Phys. C. 1989. doi:10.1007/BF01550929

    1989 doi

  85. [102]

    and others

    Marage, P. and others. Coherent Single Pion Production by Anti-neutrino Charged Current Interactions and Test of PCAC. Z. Phys. C. 1986. doi:10.1007/BF01479526

    1986 doi

  86. [103]

    and others

    Vilain, P. and others. Coherent single charged pion production by neutrinos. Phys. Lett. B. 1993. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91223-A

    1993 doi

  87. [104]

    and others

    Grabosch, H.J. and others. COHERENT PION PRODUCTION IN NEUTRINO AND ANTI-NEUTRINO INTERACTIONS ON NUCLEI OF HEAVY FREON MOLECULES. Z. Phys. C. 1986. doi:10.1007/BF01479528

    1986 doi

  88. [105]

    and others

    Kurimoto, Y. and others. Improved measurement of neutral current coherent ^0 production on carbon in a few-GeV neutrino beam. Phys. Rev. D. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.111102. arXiv:1005.0059

    2010 doi arXiv

  89. [106]

    and others

    Hiraide, K. and others. Search for Charged Current Coherent Pion Production on Carbon in a Few-GeV Neutrino Beam. Phys. Rev. D. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.112004. arXiv:0811.0369

    2008 doi arXiv

  90. [107]

    and others

    Hasegawa, M. and others. Search for coherent charged pion production in neutrino-carbon interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.252301. arXiv:hep-ex/0506008

    2005 doi arXiv

  91. [108]

    Llewellyn Smith, C. H. Neutrino Reactions at Accelerator Energies. Phys. Rept. 1972. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(72)90010-5

    1972 doi

  92. [109]

    and others

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A.A. and others. First Observation of Coherent ^0 Production in Neutrino Nucleus Interactions with E_ &lt; 2 GeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.05.006. arXiv:0803.3423

    2008 doi arXiv

  93. [110]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. and others. Event Excess in the MiniBooNE Search for _ _e Oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.181801. arXiv:1007.1150

    2010 doi arXiv

  94. [111]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. and others. Unexplained Excess of Electron-Like Events From a 1-GeV Neutrino Beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.101802. arXiv:0812.2243

    2009 doi arXiv

  95. [112]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. Measurements of neutrino oscillation in appearance and disappearance channels by the T2K experiment with 6.6 10 ^ 20 protons on target. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.072010. arXiv:1502.01550

    2015 doi arXiv

  96. [113]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. Indication of Electron Neutrino Appearance from an Accelerator-produced Off-axis Muon Neutrino Beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.041801. arXiv:1106.2822

    2011 doi arXiv

  97. [114]

    and others

    Adamson, P. and others. First measurement of muon-neutrino disappearance in NOvA. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.051104. arXiv:1601.05037

    2016 doi arXiv

  98. [115]

    and others

    Adamson, P. and others. First measurement of electron neutrino appearance in NOvA. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.151806. arXiv:1601.05022

    2016 doi arXiv

  99. [116]

    Ayres, D. S. and others. NOvA: Proposal to build a 30 kiloton off-axis detector to study nu(mu) ; nu(e) oscillations in the NuMI beamline. 2004. arXiv:hep-ex/0503053

    2004 arXiv

  100. [117]

    and Bodek, A

    Bradford, R. and Bodek, A. and Budd, Howard Scott and Arrington, J. A New parameterization of the nucleon elastic form-factors. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2006.08.028. arXiv:hep-ex/0602017

    2006 doi arXiv

  101. [118]

    and Bradford, R

    Bodek, Arie and Avvakumov, S. and Bradford, R. and Budd, Howard Scott. Extraction of the axial nucleon form-factor from neutrino experiments on deuterium. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2008. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/110/8/082004. arXiv:0709.3538

    2008 doi arXiv

  102. [119]

    and Lyubushkin, Vladimir V

    Kuzmin, Konstantin S. and Lyubushkin, Vladimir V. and Naumov, Vadim A. Quasielastic axial-vector mass from experiments on neutrino-nucleus scattering. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2008. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0582-x. arXiv:0712.4384

    2008 doi arXiv

  103. [120]

    Differences in Quasi-Elastic Cross-Sections of Muon and Electron Neutrinos

    Day, Melanie and McFarland, Kevin S. Differences in Quasi-Elastic Cross-Sections of Muon and Electron Neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.053003. arXiv:1206.6745

    2012 doi arXiv

  104. [121]

    and Abe, T

    Abe, K. and Abe, T. and Aihara, H. and Fukuda, Y. and Hayato, Y. and others. Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment --- Detector Design and Physics Potential ---. 2011. arXiv:1109.3262

    2011 arXiv

  105. [122]

    and others

    Chen, H. and others. Proposal for a New Experiment Using the Booster and NuMI Neutrino Beamlines: MicroBooNE. 2007

    2007

  106. [123]

    and others

    Akiri, T. and others. The 2010 Interim Report of the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment Collaboration Physics Working Groups. 2011. arXiv:1110.6249

    2010 arXiv

  107. [124]

    and others

    Adams, C. and others. The Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment: Exploring Fundamental Symmetries of the Universe. 2013. arXiv:1307.7335

    2013

  108. [125]

    Acciarri, R. et al. Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE). 2015. arXiv:1512.06148

    2015

  109. [126]

    Smith and E.J

    R.A. Smith and E.J. Moniz. Neutrino Reactions On Nuclear Targets. Nucl. Phys. B. 1972. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(72)90040-5

    1972 doi

  110. [129]

    Rein and L.M

    D. Rein and L.M. Sehgal. Neutrino Excitation of Baryon Resonances and Single Pion Production. Annals Phys. 1981. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(81)90242-6

    1981 doi

  111. [130]

    Andreopoulos and others

    C. Andreopoulos and others. The \ GENIE\ neutrino Monte Carlo generator. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.12.009

    2010 doi

  112. [131]

    T. Yang, C. Andreopoulos, H. Gallagher, K. Hoffmann, and P. Kehayias. A Hadronization Model for Few-GeV Neutrino Interactions. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2009. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1094-z. arXiv:0904.4043

    2009 doi arXiv

  113. [132]

    A neutrino interaction simulation program library NEUT

    Hayato, Yoshinari. A neutrino interaction simulation program library NEUT. Acta Phys. Polon. B. 2009

    2009

  114. [133]

    The Nuance neutrino physics simulation, and the future

    Casper, D. The Nuance neutrino physics simulation, and the future. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(02)01756-5. arXiv:hep-ph/0208030

    2002 doi arXiv

  115. [134]

    and Gaitanos, T

    Buss, O. and Gaitanos, T. and Gallmeister, K. and van Hees, H. and Kaskulov, M. and others. Transport-theoretical Description of Nuclear Reactions. Phys. Rept. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.12.001. arXiv:1106.1344

    2012 doi arXiv

  116. [135]

    and Gallmeister, K

    Lalakulich, O. and Gallmeister, K. and Mosel, U. Neutrino- and antineutrino-induced reactions with nuclei between 1 and 50 GeV. Phys. Rev. C. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014607. arXiv:1205.1061

    2012 doi arXiv

  117. [136]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. and others. Measurement of muon neutrino quasi-elastic scattering on carbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.032301. arXiv:0706.0926

    2008 doi arXiv

  118. [137]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. and others. First Measurement of the Muon Anti-Neutrino Double-Differential Charged Current Quasi-Elastic Cross Section. 2013. arXiv:1301.7067

    2013 arXiv

  119. [138]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. and others. Measurement of Neutrino-Induced Charged-Current Charged Pion Production Cross Sections on Mineral Oil at E _ 1 GeV. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.052007. arXiv:1011.3572

    2011 doi arXiv

  120. [139]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. and others. Measurement of _ -induced charged-current neutral pion production cross sections on mineral oil at E_ 0.5-2.0 GeV. Phys. Rev. D. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.052009. arXiv:1010.3264

    2011 doi arXiv

  121. [140]

    and Jourdan, J

    Carlson, J. and Jourdan, J. and Schiavilla, R. and Sick, I. Longitudinal and transverse quasielastic response functions of light nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 2002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.024002. arXiv:nucl-th/0106047

    2002 doi arXiv

  122. [141]

    and Marcucci, L

    Shen, G. and Marcucci, L. E. and Carlson, J. and Gandolfi, S. and Schiavilla, R. Inclusive neutrino scattering off deuteron from threshold to GeV energies. Phys. Rev. C. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.035503. arXiv:1205.4337

    2012 doi arXiv

  123. [142]

    and Shneor, R

    Subedi, R. and Shneor, R. and Monaghan, P. and Anderson, B. D. and Aniol, K. and others. Probing Cold Dense Nuclear Matter. Science. 2008. doi:10.1126/science.1156675. arXiv:0908.1514

    2008 doi arXiv

  124. [143]

    Donnelly, T. W. and Sick, Ingo. Superscaling of inclusive electron scattering from nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.60.065502. arXiv:nucl-th/9905060

    1999 doi arXiv

  125. [144]

    and Ericson, M

    Martini, M. and Ericson, M. and Chanfray, G. and Marteau, J. Neutrino and antineutrino quasielastic interactions with nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.045502. arXiv:1002.4538

    2010 doi arXiv

  126. [145]

    and Ericson, M

    Martini, M. and Ericson, M. Quasielastic and multinucleon excitations in antineutrino-nucleus interactions. 2013. arXiv:1303.7199

    2013 arXiv

  127. [146]

    and Valverde, M

    Nieves, J. and Valverde, M. and Vicente Vacas, M. J. Inclusive nucleon emission induced by quasi-elastic neutrino-nucleus interactions. Phys. Rev. C. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.025504. arXiv:hep-ph/0511204

    2006 doi arXiv

  128. [147]

    and Sobczyk, Jan T

    Graczyk, Krzysztof M. and Sobczyk, Jan T. The Algebraic solution of RPA equations for the charged current quasielastic neutrino nucleus scattering. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2003. doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003-01338-6. arXiv:nucl-th/0303054

    2003 doi arXiv

  129. [148]

    S. K. Singh and E. Oset. Quasielastic neutrino (antineutrino) reactions in nuclei and the axial-vector form factor of the nucleon. Nucl. Phys. A. 1992. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(92)90259-M

    1992 doi

  130. [149]

    and Fabrocini, A

    Benhar, O. and Fabrocini, A. and Fantoni, S. and Sick, I. Spectral function of finite nuclei and scattering of GeV electrons. Nucl. Phys. A. 1994. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(94)90920-2

    1994 doi

  131. [150]

    and Sobczyk, Jan T

    Ankowski, Artur M. and Sobczyk, Jan T. Construction of spectral functions for medium-mass nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.044311. arXiv:0711.2031

    2008 doi arXiv

  132. [151]

    and Mosel, U

    Lalakulich, O. and Mosel, U. and Gallmeister, K. Energy reconstruction in quasielastic scattering in the MiniBooNE and T2K experiments. Phys. Rev. C. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054606. arXiv:1208.3678

    2012 doi arXiv

  133. [152]

    Ahrens, L. A. and Aronson, S. H. and Gibbard, B. G. and Murtagh, M. J. and White, D. H. and others. A STUDY OF THE AXIAL VECTOR FORM-FACTOR AND SECOND CLASS CURRENTS IN ANTI-NEUTRINO QUASIELASTIC SCATTERING. Phys. Lett. B. 1988. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90026-3

    1988 doi

  134. [153]

    and others

    Aliaga, L. and others. Neutrino Flux Predictions for the NuMI Beam. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.092005. arXiv:1607.00704

    2016 doi arXiv

  135. [154]

    and others

    Aliaga, L. and others. MINERvA neutrino detector response measured with test beam data. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2015.04.003. arXiv:1501.06431

    2015 doi arXiv

  136. [155]

    and Chvojka, J

    Fields, L. and Chvojka, J. and others. Measurement of Muon Antineutrino Quasielastic Scattering on a Hydrocarbon Target at EΜ∌3.5  GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.022501. arXiv:1305.2234

    2013 doi arXiv

  137. [156]

    and Schmitz, D.W

    Fiorentini, G.A. and Schmitz, D.W. and others. Measurement of Muon Neutrino Quasielastic Scattering on a Hydrocarbon Target at EΜ∌3.5  GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013. arXiv:1305.2243

    2013 arXiv

  138. [157]

    and Bernstein, B

    Anderson, K. and Bernstein, B. and Boehnlein, D. and Bourkland, Kenneth R. and Childress, S. and others. The NuMI Facility Technical Design Report. 1998

    1998

  139. [158]

    and others

    Adamson, P. and others. The NuMI Neutrino Beam. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2015.08.063. arXiv:1507.06690

    2016 doi arXiv

  140. [159]

    and Sala, Paola R

    Battistoni, Giuseppe and Muraro, S. and Sala, Paola R. and Cerutti, Fabio and Ferrari, A. and others. The FLUKA code: Description and benchmarking. AIP Conf. Proc. 2007. doi:10.1063/1.2720455

    2007 doi

  141. [160]

    and Fasso, Alberto and Ranft, Johannes

    Ferrari, Alfredo and Sala, Paola R. and Fasso, Alberto and Ranft, Johannes. FLUKA: A multi-particle transport code (Program version 2005). 2005

    2005

  142. [161]

    Allison and others

    J. Allison and others. Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on , title=. 2006 , volume=. doi:10.1109/TNS.2006.869826 , ISSN=

    2006 doi

  143. [162]

    and others

    Agostinelli, S. and others. GEANT4--a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    2003 doi

  144. [163]

    Perdue, G. N. and others. The MINER A Data Acquisition System and Infrastructure. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2012.08.024. arXiv:1209.1120

    2012 doi arXiv

  145. [164]

    K2K (KEK to Kamioka) neutrino - oscillation experiment at KEK PS

    Oyama, Yuichi. K2K (KEK to Kamioka) neutrino - oscillation experiment at KEK PS. 1998. arXiv:hep-ex/9803014

    1998 arXiv

  146. [165]

    Michael, D. G. and others. The Magnetized steel and scintillator calorimeters of the MINOS experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.08.003. arXiv:0805.3170

    2008 doi arXiv

  147. [166]

    and others

    Adamson, P. and others. Electron neutrino and antineutrino appearance in the full MINOS data sample. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.171801. arXiv:1301.4581

    2013 doi arXiv

  148. [167]

    and others

    Acciarri, R. and others. A Proposal for a Three Detector Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Program for the Fermilab Booster Neutrino Beam. 2015. arXiv:1503.01520

    2015

  149. [168]

    An, F. P. and others. Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.171803. arXiv:1203.1669

    2012 doi arXiv

  150. [169]

    Ahn, J. K. and others. Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.191802. arXiv:1204.0626

    2012 doi arXiv

  151. [170]

    Moniz, E. J. and Sick, I. and Whitney, R. R. and Ficenec, J. R. and Kephart, Robert D. and others. Nuclear Fermi momenta from quasielastic electron scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1971. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.445

    1971 doi

  152. [171]

    Van Orden and T.W

    J.W. Van Orden and T.W. Donnelly. MESONIC PROCESSES IN DEEP INELASTIC ELECTRON SCATTERING FROM NUCLEI. Annals Phys. 1981. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(81)90038-5

    1981 doi

  153. [172]

    Improved low Q**2 model for neutrino and electron nucleon cross sections in few GeV region

    Bodek, Arie and Park, Inkyu and Yang, Un-Ki. Improved low Q**2 model for neutrino and electron nucleon cross sections in few GeV region. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.208. arXiv:hep-ph/0411202

    2005 doi arXiv

  154. [173]

    A Measurement of the muon neutrino charged current quasielastic interaction and a test of Lorentz violation with the MiniBooNE experiment

    Katori, Teppei. A Measurement of the muon neutrino charged current quasielastic interaction and a test of Lorentz violation with the MiniBooNE experiment. 2008. doi:10.2172/945410

    2008 doi

  155. [174]

    Observation of Disappearance of Muon Neutrinos in the NuMI Beam

    Pavlovic, Zarko. Observation of Disappearance of Muon Neutrinos in the NuMI Beam. 2008

    2008

  156. [175]

    A Multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes' theorem

    D'Agostini, G. A Multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes' theorem. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 1995. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(95)00274-X

    1995 doi

  157. [176]

    Improved iterative Bayesian unfolding

    D'Agostini, G. Improved iterative Bayesian unfolding. Alliance Workshop on Unfolding and Data Correction. 2010. arXiv:1010.0632

    2010 arXiv

  158. [177]

    Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold

    Adye, Tim. Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold. 2011. arXiv:1105.1160

    2011 arXiv

  159. [178]

    and Amaro, J

    Maieron, C. and Amaro, J. E. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. and others. Superscaling of non-quasielastic electron-nucleus scattering. Phys. Rev. C. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.035504. arXiv:0907.1841

    2009 doi arXiv

  160. [179]

    and Amaro, J

    Ruiz Simo, I. and Amaro, J. E. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Megias, G. D. and Donnelly, T. W. Two-nucleon emission in neutrino and electron scattering from nuclei: the modified convolution approximation. Annals Phys. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2017.11.029. arXiv:1706.06377

    2018 doi arXiv

  161. [180]

    and Amaro, J. E

    Megias, G. D. and Amaro, J. E. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. and Ruiz Simo, I. Charged-current neutrino-nucleus reactions within the superscaling meson-exchange current approach. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.093004. arXiv:...

    2016 doi arXiv

  162. [181]

    Megias, G. D. and others. Meson-exchange currents and quasielastic predictions for charged-current neutrino- ^ 12 C scattering in the superscaling approach. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.073004. arXiv:1412.1822

    2015 doi arXiv

  163. [182]

    Megias, G. D. and Amaro, J. E. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. Neutrino and antineutrino CCQE scattering in the SuperScaling Approximation from MiniBooNE to NOMAD energies. Phys. Lett. B. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.07.004. arXiv:1305.6884

    2013 doi arXiv

  164. [183]

    Amaro, J. E. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. Meson-exchange currents and quasielastic antineutrino cross sections in the SuperScaling Approximation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.152501. arXiv:1112.2123

    2012 doi arXiv

  165. [184]

    Amaro, J. E. and Barbaro, M. B. and Caballero, J. A. and Donnelly, T. W. and Williamson, C. F. Meson-exchange currents and quasielastic neutrino cross sections in the SuperScaling Approximation model. Phys.Lett. B. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.007. arXiv:1010.1708

    2011 doi arXiv

  166. [185]

    Bodek and J.L

    A. Bodek and J.L. Ritchie. Fermi Motion Effects in Deep Inelastic Lepton Scattering from Nuclear Targets. Phys. Rev. D. 1981. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.1070

    1981 doi

  167. [186]

    Bodek and J.L

    A. Bodek and J.L. Ritchie. Further Studies of Fermi Motion Effects in Lepton Scattering from Nuclear Targets. Phys. Rev. D. 1981. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1400

    1981 doi

  168. [187]

    Bodek and M.E

    A. Bodek and M.E. Christy and B. Coopersmith. Effective Spectral Function for Quasielastic Scattering on Nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2014. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3091-0. arXiv:1405.0583

    2014 doi

  169. [188]

    Abe, et al

    Y. Abe, et al. Indication for the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos in the Double Chooz experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.131801. arXiv:1112.6353

    2012 doi arXiv

  170. [189]

    and Carnesecchi, G

    Bonetti, S. and Carnesecchi, G. and Cavalli, D. and Negri, P. and Pullia, A. and others. Study of Quasielastic Reactions of Neutrino and anti-neutrino in Gargamelle. Nuovo Cim. A. 1977. doi:10.1007/BF02730023

    1977 doi

  171. [190]

    and Simo, I

    Nieves, J. and Simo, I. Ruiz and Vicente Vacas, M. J. Two Particle-Hole Excitations in Charged Current Quasielastic Antineutrino--Nucleus Scattering. Phys. Lett. B. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.03.002. arXiv:1302.0703

    2013 doi arXiv

  172. [191]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. and others. The MiniBooNE Detector. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.10.028. arXiv:0806.4201

    2009 doi arXiv

  173. [192]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. The T2K Experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2011.06.067. arXiv:1106.1238

    2011 doi

  174. [193]

    B. Z. Kopeliovich. NP : Neutrinoproduction of Pions off Nuclei

  175. [194]

    and others

    Allen, P. and others. A Study of Single Meson Production in Neutrino and Anti-neutrinos Charged Current Interactions on Protons. Nucl. Phys. B. 1986. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90480-3

    1986 doi

  176. [195]

    and Navon, I

    Ashery, D. and Navon, I. and Azuelos, G. and Walter, H.K. and Pfeiffer, H.J. and Schlep \"u tz, F.W. True Absorption and Scattering of Pions on Nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 1981

    1981

  177. [196]

    and Batty, C.J

    Allardyce, B.W. and Batty, C.J. and Baugh, D.J. and Friedman, E. and Heymann, G. and others. Pion reaction cross-sections and nuclear sizes. Nucl. Phys. A. 1973

    1973

  178. [197]

    and others

    Clough, A.S. and others. Pion-Nucleus Total Cross-Sections from 88-MeV to 860-MeV. Nucl. Phys. B. 1974. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90134-5

    1974 doi

  179. [198]

    and Domingo, J.J

    Wilkin, Colin and Cox, C.R. and Domingo, J.J. and Gabathuler, K. and Pedroni, E. and Rohlin, J. and Schwaller, P. and Tanner, N.W. A comparison of ^ + and ^ - total cross-sections of light nuclei near the 3-3 resonance. Nucl. Phys. B. 1973. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90242-3

    1973 doi

  180. [199]

    and Carlson, R.F

    McGill, W.F. and Carlson, R.F. and Short, T.H. and Cameron, J.M. and Richardson, J.Reginald and Slaus, I. and Van Oers, Willem T.H. and Verba, J.W. and Margaziotis, D.J. and Doherty, P. Measurements of the proton total reaction cross section for light nuclei between 20 and 48 ...

    1974 doi

  181. [200]

    and Igo, G

    Dicello, J.F. and Igo, G. Proton Total Reaction Cross Sections in the 10-20-MeV Range: Calcium-40 and Carbon-12. Phys. Rev. C. 1970. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.2.488

    1970 doi

  182. [201]

    and Gross, E.E

    Menet, J.J.H. and Gross, E.E. and Malanify, J.J. and Zucker, A. Total-Reaction-Cross-Section Measurements for 30-60-MeV Protons and the Imaginary Optical Potential. Phys. Rev. C. 1971. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.4.1114

    1971 doi

  183. [202]

    and Hoeibraten, S

    Saunders, A. and Hoeibraten, S. and Kraushaar, J.J. and Kriss, B.J. and Peterson, R.J. and others. Reaction and total cross-sections for low-energy pi+ and pi- on isospin zero nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 1996

    1996

  184. [203]

    and Redwine, R.P

    Lee, T.S.H. and Redwine, R.P. Pion nucleus interactions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2002

    2002

  185. [204]

    Abfalterer, W. P. and Bateman, F. B. and Dietrich, F. S. and Finlay, R. W. and Haight, R. C. and others. Measurement of neutron total cross-sections up to 560-MeV. Phys. Rev. C. 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.044608

    2001 doi

  186. [205]

    and Devlin, T

    Schimmerling, W. and Devlin, T. J. and Johnson, W. W. and Vosburgh, K. G. and Mischke, R. E. Neutron-nucleus total and inelastic cross-sections - 900 to 2600 mev/c. Phys. Rev. C. 1973. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.7.248

    1973 doi

  187. [206]

    Voss, R. G. P. and Wilson, R. Proc.Roy.Soc. 1956

    1956

  188. [207]

    and Corcalciuc, V

    Slypen, I. and Corcalciuc, V. and Meulders, J. P. Proton and deuteron production in neutron-induced reactions on carbon at E(n) = 42.5, 62.7, and 72.8 MeV. Phys. Rev. C. 1995. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.51.1303

    1995 doi

  189. [208]

    and Koncz, P

    Franz, J. and Koncz, P. and Rossle, E. and Sauerwein, C. and Schmitt, H. and others. NEUTRON INDUCED PRODUCTION OF PROTONS, DEUTERONS AND TRITONS ON COPPER AND BISMUTH. Nucl. Phys. A. 1990. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(90)90360-X

    1990 doi

  190. [209]

    and Pomp, S

    Tippawan, U. and Pomp, S. and Blomgren, J. and Dangtip, S. and Gustavsson, C. and others. Light-ion production in the interaction of 96-MeV neutrons with carbon. Phys. Rev. C. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064611. arXiv:0812.0701

    2009 doi arXiv

  191. [210]

    and Pomp, S

    Bevilacqua, R. and Pomp, S. and Hayashi, M. and Hjalmarsson, A. and Tippawan, U. and others. Light-ion production from O, Si, Fe and Bi induced by 175 MeV quasi-monoenergetic neutron. 2013. arXiv:1303.4637

    2013 arXiv

  192. [211]

    Zanelli, C. I. and Urone, P. P. and Romero, J. L. and Brady, Franklin Paul and Johnson, M. L. and others. Total non-elastic cross sections of neutrons on C, O, Ca, and Fe at 40.3 and 50.4 MeV. Phys. Rev. C. 1981. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.23.1015

    1981 doi

  193. [212]

    Paley, J. M. and others. Measurement of Charged Pion Production Yields off the NuMI Target. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.032001. arXiv:1404.5882

    2014 doi arXiv

  194. [213]

    and others

    Alt, C. and others. Inclusive production of charged pions in p+C collisions at 158-GeV/c beam momentum. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2007. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0165-7. arXiv:hep-ex/0606028

    2007 doi arXiv

  195. [214]

    Barton, D. S. and others. Experimental Study of the a-Dependence of Inclusive Hadron Fragmentation. Phys. Rev. D. 1983. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2580

    1983 doi

  196. [215]

    Sterile neutrino oscillations in MINOS and hadron production in pC collisions

    Tinti, Gemma Maria. Sterile neutrino oscillations in MINOS and hadron production in pC collisions. 2010

    2010

  197. [216]

    Ratio of pion kaon production in proton carbon interactions

    Lebedev, Andrey V. Ratio of pion kaon production in proton carbon interactions. 2007

    2007

  198. [217]

    Measurement of -K ratios from the NuMI target

    Seun, Sin Man. Measurement of -K ratios from the NuMI target. 2007

    2007

  199. [218]

    and others

    Baatar, B. and others. Inclusive production of protons, anti-protons, neutrons, deuterons and tritons in p+C collisions at 158 GeV/c beam momentum. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2013. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2364-3. arXiv:1207.6520

    2013 doi arXiv

  200. [219]

    Denisov, S. P. and Donskov, S. V. and Gorin, Yu . P. and Krasnokutsky, R. N. and Petrukhin, A. I. and Prokoshkin, Yu . D. and Stoyanova, D. A. Absorption cross-sections for pions, kaons, protons and anti-protons on complex nuclei in the 6-GeV/c to 60-GeV/c momentum range. Nucl...

    1973 doi

  201. [220]

    Allaby, J. V. and others. Total cross-sections of pi-minus, k-minus, and anti-p on protons and deuterons in the momentum range 20-65 gev/c. Phys. Lett. B. 1969. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(69)90184-1

    1969 doi

  202. [221]

    Carroll, A. S. and others. Absorption Cross-Sections of pi+-, K+-, p and anti-p on Nuclei Between 60-GeV/c and 280-GeV/c. Phys. Lett. B. 1979. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90226-0

    1979 doi

  203. [222]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. T2K neutrino flux prediction. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.012001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.019902. arXiv:1211.0469

    2013 doi arXiv

  204. [223]

    Egiyan, K. S. and others. Measurement of 2- and 3-nucleon short range correlation probabilities in nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.082501. arXiv:nucl-ex/0508026

    2006 doi arXiv

  205. [224]

    and others

    Acciarri, R. and others. Detection of back-to-back proton pairs in charged-current neutrino interactions with the ArgoNeuT detector in the NuMI low energy beam line. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.012008. arXiv:1405.4261

    2014 doi arXiv

  206. [225]

    Carlson and V.G

    A.D. Carlson and V.G. Pronyaev and D.L. Smith and N.M. Larson and Zhenpeng Chen and G.M. Hale and F.-J. Hambsch and E.V. Gai and Soo-Youl Oh and S.A. Badikov and T. Kawano and H.M. Hofmann and H. Vonach and S. Tagesen. International Evaluation of Neutron Cross Section Standard...

    2009 doi

  207. [226]

    Model-independent determination of the axial mass parameter in quasielastic neutrino-nucleon scattering , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.073006 , url =

    2011 doi

  208. [228]

    ROOT — An object oriented data analysis framework

    Rene Brun and Fons Rademakers. ROOT — An object oriented data analysis framework. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1997. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00048-X

    1997 doi

  209. [229]

    Le and J.L

    T. Le and J.L. Palomino and others. Single neutral pion production by charged-current ν¯μ interactions on hydrocarbon at 〈Eν〉=3.6 GeV. Physics Letters B. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.039

    2015 doi

  210. [230]

    Mann, W. A. and others. Study of the reaction nu n ---> mu- p. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1973. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.844

    1973 doi

  211. [231]

    Barish, S. J. and others. Study of Neutrino Interactions in Hydrogen and Deuterium. 1. Description of the Experiment and Study of the Reaction Neutrino d --> mu- p p(s). Phys. Rev. D. 1977. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.3103

    1977 doi

  212. [232]

    Miller, K. L. and others. STUDY OF THE REACTION muon-neutrino D ---> MU- P P(S). Phys. Rev. D. 1982. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.26.537

    1982 doi

  213. [233]

    Baker, N. J. and Cnops, A. M. and Connolly, P. L. and Kahn, S. A. and Kirk, H. G. and Murtagh, M. J. and Palmer, R. B. and Samios, N. P. and Tanaka, M. Quasielastic Neutrino Scattering: A Measurement of the Weak Nucleon Axial Vector Form-Factor. Phys. Rev. D. 1981. doi:10.1103...

    1981 doi

  214. [234]

    and others

    Kitagaki, T. and others. High-Energy Quasielastic Muon-neutrino n ---> mu- p Scattering in Deuterium. Phys. Rev. D. 1983. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.28.436

    1983 doi

  215. [235]

    and others

    Brunner, J. and others. Quasielastic Nucleon and Hyperon Production by Neutrinos and Anti-neutrinos With Energies Below 30- GeV. Z. Phys. C. 1990. doi:10.1007/BF01556267

    1990 doi

  216. [236]

    and others

    Pohl, M. and others. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE REACTION neutrino N ---> MU- P. Lett. Nuovo Cim. 1979. doi:10.1007/BF02746631

    1979 doi

  217. [237]

    Auerbach, L. B. and others. Measurements of charged current reactions of muon neutrinos on C-12. Phys. Rev. C. 2002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.015501. arXiv:nucl-ex/0203011

    2002 doi arXiv

  218. [238]

    Belikov, S. V. and others. Quasielastic Neutrino and Anti-neutrinos Scattering: Total Cross-sections, Axial Vector Form-factor. Z. Phys. A. 1985. doi:10.1007/BF01411863

    1985 doi

  219. [240]

    Hill and Gabriel Lee

    Zhihong Ye and John Arrington and Richard J. Hill and Gabriel Lee. Proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors and uncertainties. Physics Letters B. 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.023

    2018 doi

  220. [241]

    and others

    Filkins, A. and others. Double-differential inclusive charged-current _ cross sections on hydrocarbon in MINERvA at E_ 3.5 GeV. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.112007. arXiv:2002.12496

    2020 doi

  221. [242]

    and others

    Kovarik, K. and others. nCTEQ15 - Global analysis of nuclear parton distributions with uncertainties in the CTEQ framework. Phys.\ Rev.\ D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.085037. arXiv:1509.00792

    2016 doi arXiv

  222. [243]

    and Yu, J.Y

    Schienbein, I. and Yu, J.Y. and Keppel, C. and Morfin, J.G. and Olness, F. and Owens, J.F. Nuclear parton distribution functions from neutrino deep inelastic scattering. Phys.\ Rev.\ D. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.054013. arXiv:0710.4897

    2008 doi arXiv

  223. [244]

    and Zaidi, F

    Haider, H. and Zaidi, F. and Sajjad Athar, M. and Singh, S.K. and Ruiz Simo, I. Nuclear medium effects in F_ 2A ^ EM (x,Q^2) and F_ 2A ^ Weak (x,Q^2) structure functions. Nucl.\ Phys.\ A. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.06.006. arXiv:1603.00164

    2016 doi arXiv

  224. [245]

    and others

    Coplowe, D. and others. Probing nuclear effects with neutrino-induced charged-current neutral pion production. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.072007. arXiv:2002.05812

    2020 doi

  225. [246]

    and others

    Stowell, P. and others. NUISANCE: a neutrino cross-section generator tuning and comparison framework. JINST. 2017. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01016. arXiv:1612.07393

    2017 doi arXiv

  226. [247]

    Lu, X. G. and others. Measurement of final-state correlations in neutrino muon-proton mesonless production on hydrocarbon at E_ =3 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.022504. arXiv:1805.05486

    2018 doi arXiv

  227. [248]

    and others

    Ruterbories, D. and others. Measurement of Quasielastic-Like Neutrino Scattering at E_ 3.5 GeV on a Hydrocarbon Target. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.012004. arXiv:1811.02774

    2019 doi arXiv

  228. [249]

    and others

    Gran, R. and others. Antineutrino Charged-Current Reactions on Hydrocarbon with Low Momentum Transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.221805. arXiv:1803.09377

    2018 doi arXiv

  229. [250]

    Removal Energies and Final State Interaction in Lepton Nucleus Scattering

    Bodek, Arie and Cai, Tejin. Removal Energies and Final State Interaction in Lepton Nucleus Scattering. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2019. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6750-3. arXiv:1801.07975

    2019 doi arXiv

  230. [251]

    and others

    Bashyal, A. and others. Use of Neutrino Scattering Events with Low Hadronic Recoil to Inform Neutrino Flux and Detector Energy Scale. JINST. 2021. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/08/P08068. arXiv:2104.05769

    2021 doi

  231. [252]

    and Stenico, G

    De Gouv\^ea, Andr\'e and Kelly, Kevin J. and Stenico, G. V. and Pasquini, Pedro. Physics with Beam Tau-Neutrino Appearance at DUNE. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.016004. arXiv:1904.07265

    2019 doi arXiv

  232. [253]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, A. A. and others. First Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Charged Current Quasielastic Double Differential Cross Section. Phys. Rev. D. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.092005. arXiv:1002.2680

    2010 doi arXiv

  233. [254]

    and others

    Abratenko, P. and others. Measurement of differential cross sections for _ -Ar charged-current interactions with protons and no pions in the final state with the MicroBooNE detector. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.112013. arXiv:2010.02390

    2020 doi

  234. [255]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. Simultaneous measurement of the muon neutrino charged-current cross section on oxygen and carbon without pions in the final state at T2K. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.112004. arXiv:2004.05434

    2020 doi

  235. [256]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. Characterization of nuclear effects in muon-neutrino scattering on hydrocarbon with a measurement of final-state kinematics and correlations in charged-current pionless interactions at T2K. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.032003. arXiv:1802.05078

    2018 doi arXiv

  236. [257]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. First measurement of the _ charged-current cross section on a water target without pions in the final state. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.012001. arXiv:1708.06771

    2018 doi arXiv

  237. [258]

    Measurement of double-differential muon neutrino charged-current interactions on C _8 H _8 without pions in the final state using the T2K off-axis beam

    Abe, Ko and others. Measurement of double-differential muon neutrino charged-current interactions on C _8 H _8 without pions in the final state using the T2K off-axis beam. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.112012. arXiv:1602.03652

    2016 doi arXiv

  238. [259]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. Measurement of the _ charged current quasielastic cross section on carbon with the T2K on-axis neutrino beam. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.112002. arXiv:1503.07452

    2015 doi arXiv

  239. [260]

    and others

    Abe, K. and others. Measurement of the _μ charged-current quasielastic cross section on carbon with the ND280 detector at T2K. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.112003. arXiv:1411.6264

    2015 doi arXiv

  240. [261]

    and others

    Adamson, P. and others. Study of quasielastic scattering using charged-current -iron interactions in the MINOS near detector. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.012005. arXiv:1410.8613

    2015 doi arXiv

  241. [262]

    Fiorentini, G. A. and others. Measurement of Muon Neutrino Quasielastic Scattering on a Hydrocarbon Target at E_ 3.5 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.022502. arXiv:1305.2243

    2013 doi arXiv

  242. [263]

    Patrick, C. E. and others. Measurement of the Muon Antineutrino Double-Differential Cross Section for Quasielastic-like Scattering on Hydrocarbon at E_ 3.5 GeV. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.052002. arXiv:1801.01197

    2018 doi arXiv

  243. [264]

    and others

    Cai, T. and others. Nucleon binding energy and transverse momentum imbalance in neutrino-nucleus reactions. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.092001. arXiv:1910.08658

    2020 doi

  244. [265]

    Carneiro, M. F. and others. High-Statistics Measurement of Neutrino Quasielasticlike Scattering at 6 GeV on a Hydrocarbon Target. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.121801. arXiv:1912.09890

    2020 doi

  245. [266]

    and others

    Abratenko, P. and others. First Measurement of Differential Charged Current Quasielastic-like _ -Argon Scattering Cross Sections with the MicroBooNE Detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.201803. arXiv:2006.00108

    2020 doi

  246. [267]

    Ascencio, M. V. and others. Measurement of inclusive charged-current scattering on hydrocarbon at E 6 \, \, GeV with low three-momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.032001. arXiv:2110.13372

    2022 doi

  247. [268]

    and Walker-Loud, Andr\'e and Wilkinson, Callum

    Meyer, Aaron S. and Walker-Loud, Andr\'e and Wilkinson, Callum. Status of Lattice QCD Determination of Nucleon Form Factors and their Relevance for the Few-GeV Neutrino Program. 2022. arXiv:2201.01839

    2022

  248. [269]

    and Lee, Gabriel and Tomalak, Oleksandr

    Borah, Kaushik and Hill, Richard J. and Lee, Gabriel and Tomalak, Oleksandr. Parametrization and applications of the low- Q^2 nucleon vector form factors. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.074012. arXiv:2003.13640

    2020 doi

  249. [270]

    and others

    Cai, T. and others. Measurement of the axial vector form factor from antineutrino proton scattering. Nature. 2023. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05478-3

    2023 doi

  250. [271]

    Comparison of optical potential for nucleons and resonances: In electron scattering from nuclear targets

    Bodek, Arie and Cai, Tejin. Comparison of optical potential for nucleons and resonances: In electron scattering from nuclear targets. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2020. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8236-8. arXiv:2004.00087

    2020 doi

  251. [272]

    and Benhar, Omar and Sakuda, Makoto

    Ankowski, Artur M. and Benhar, Omar and Sakuda, Makoto. Improving the accuracy of neutrino energy reconstruction in charged-current quasielastic scattering off nuclear targets. Phys. Rev. D. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.033005. arXiv:1404.5687

    2015 doi arXiv

  252. [273]

    and Giusti, C

    Boffi, S. and Giusti, C. and Pacati, F. D. Nuclear response in electromagnetic interactions with complex nuclei. Phys. Rept. 1993. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(93)90132-W

    1993 doi

  253. [274]

    Cooper, E. D. and Hama, S. and Clark, B. C. and Mercer, R. L. Global Dirac phenomenology for proton nucleus elastic scattering. Phys. Rev. C. 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.47.297

    1993 doi

  254. [275]

    O'Connell, J. S. and Sealock, R. M. Phenomenological Delta nucleus potential from inclusive electron nucleus scattering data. Phys. Rev. C. 1990. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.42.2290

    1990 doi

  255. [276]

    Sealock, R. M. and others. Electroexcitation of the (1232) in Nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1350

    1989 doi

  256. [277]

    and Lenz, F

    Horikawa, Y. and Lenz, F. and Mukhopadhyay, N. C. Final State Interaction in Inclusive Electromagnetic Nuclear Processes. Phys. Rev. C. 1980. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.22.1680

    1980 doi

  257. [278]

    and others

    Papadopoulou, A. and others. Inclusive Electron Scattering And The GENIE Neutrino Event Generator. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.113003. arXiv:2009.07228

    2021 doi

  258. [279]

    and Friedland, Alexander

    Ankowski, Artur M. and Friedland, Alexander. Assessing the accuracy of the GENIE event generator with electron-scattering data. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.053001. arXiv:2006.11944

    2020 doi

  259. [280]

    and others

    Zazueta, L. and others. Improved constraint on the MINER A medium energy neutrino flux using e- e- data. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.012001. arXiv:2209.05540

    2023 doi

  260. [281]

    and others

    Abubakar, S. and others. Joint neutrino oscillation analysis from the T2K and NOvA experiments. Nature. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09599-3. arXiv:2510.19888

    2025 doi

  261. [282]

    and others

    Ruterbories, D. and others. Simultaneous Measurement of Proton and Lepton Kinematics in Quasielasticlike -Hydrocarbon Interactions from 2 to 20 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.021803. arXiv:2203.08022

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.