pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00756 · v1 · pith:IMUDLVIEnew · submitted 2026-05-30 · 💻 cs.AI

CoMIC: Collaborative Memory and Insights Circulation for Long-Horizon LLM Agents in Cloud-Edge Systems

Yannan Wang , Longli Yang , Zhen Liu , Abhishek Kumar , Carsten Maple This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 18:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords CoMICcloud-edge systemsLLM agentslong-horizon taskscollaborative memoryparameter-freesubgoal trackingtrajectory filtering
0
0 comments X

The pith

CoMIC lets edge LLM agents share filtered insights from a cloud critic to improve long-horizon task handling without model updates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents CoMIC to overcome the limits of lightweight edge-based LLM agents on tasks that require tracking many steps, memory of past actions, and adjustment of plans. Edge agents operate with local subgoal-focused memory that selectively pulls in relevant past steps, while a separate cloud component reviews finished runs, keeps only the useful parts, and distributes guidance tied to shared subgoal labels. This produces measurable lifts in how far agents advance and how accurately they pick actions across five different tasks, all without any changes to the underlying models. The design separates local action from central review so that resource-limited devices can still benefit from collective experience.

Core claim

CoMIC follows a Centralized Reflection, Decentralized Execution design: edge agents execute locally using subgoal-oriented hierarchical memory and selective re-expansion of relevant histories, while a cloud-side LLM critic asynchronously evaluates completed trajectories, filters reusable experience, and aggregates cross-agent guidance keyed by semantic subgoal identifiers. Across five long-horizon agent tasks spanning symbolic planning and text interaction, CoMIC improves progress rate and action grounding for weak edge agents and yields task-dependent success-rate gains without updating model parameters.

What carries the argument

Centralized Reflection, Decentralized Execution design with cloud-side LLM critic that filters reusable experience from trajectories and aggregates cross-agent guidance keyed by semantic subgoal identifiers.

If this is right

  • Edge agents achieve higher progress rates and improved action grounding on long-horizon tasks.
  • Success rates show task-dependent gains on both symbolic planning and text-interaction benchmarks.
  • Agents maintain persistent memory and subgoal tracking through circulated insights without local model changes.
  • Execution stays on the edge to keep latency low while reflection runs asynchronously in the cloud.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The semantic subgoal identifiers could support transfer if agents encounter new tasks that share abstract substructures with prior ones.
  • Selective history re-expansion might allow edge models to operate with smaller context windows than fully local memory approaches.
  • The separation of execution and reflection could apply to other distributed agent systems where central filtering reduces noise from individual runs.

Load-bearing premise

The cloud-side LLM critic can reliably filter reusable experience and produce cross-agent guidance that actually improves edge agent performance rather than introducing noise or incorrect subgoals.

What would settle it

An experiment that replaces the cloud critic with random or unfiltered trajectory sharing and measures whether edge-agent progress rates and action accuracy still rise on the same five tasks would settle the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.00756 by Abhishek Kumar, Carsten Maple, Longli Yang, Yannan Wang, Zhen Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System architecture and workflow of COMIC. The edge organizes long-horizon tasks into subgoal episodes, interacts with the environment, and maintains hierarchical local memory. Completed trajectories are uploaded asynchronously to the cloud for evaluation and aggregation. The cloud uses trajectory-level reflections for evidence admission and returns selected Global Guidance as the single advisory channel f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Excerpted prompt templates aligned with the current implementation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Progress Rate vs. Context Token Consumption. The plots show context token consump￾tion across datasets against the corresponding progress rates, where asterisks denote averages over all environments. Scenario A highlights that COMIC improves task progression while reducing context cost relative to the STANDARD baseline, whereas Scenario B shows that trajectories generated by stronger edge agent yield selec… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cloud-edge-end system. Deploying lightweight LLM agents at the edge servers enables localized services for end users. However, constrained by scale-out deployment costs, widely distributed edge nodes cannot host massive models with parameter scales comparable to cloud servers, which strictly limits the reasoning capabilities, memory capacities, and computational resources of edge agents. When facing the de… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Progress Rate vs. Execution Steps in Scenario A. Compared to the standard baseline, the edge agent under the COMIC framework achieves significantly higher progress rates within the same or fewer execution steps across multiple environments, demonstrating enhanced action efficiency. 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 Blocksworld Gripper Tyreworld Barman Jericho Overall STANDARD 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 Blocksworld Gripper Tyrewo… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Progress Rate vs. Execution Steps in Scenario B. Compared to Scenario A, the weak edge in Scenario B shows selective progress gains while maintaining comparable execution length across environments. 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 Blocksworld Gripper Tyreworld Barman Jericho Overall SCENARIO A 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 Blocksworld Gripper Tyreworld Barman Jericho Overall SCENARIO B 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 [PI… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Cloud Overhead Metrics in Scenario B. Resource consumption of the cloud-side memory mechanism, consisting of (a) Cloud Pipeline Metrics (Pipeline Total) and (b) Cloud Guidance Metrics (Guidance Total). (c) Cloud-side Total Overhead (Cloud Total) presents the sum and the respective proportions of (a) and (b). 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Deploying lightweight Large Language Model (LLM) agents on edge servers can reduce latency and move agentic services closer to users, but resource-constrained edge models often struggle with long-horizon tasks that require persistent memory, subgoal tracking, and reflection. Fine-tuning edge models after deployment is costly and difficult to scale across heterogeneous nodes, while purely local memory leaves agents with isolated experience and growing prompt context. We propose \textsc{CoMIC}, a parameter-update-free cloud-edge framework for Collaborative Memory and Insights Circulation. \textsc{CoMIC} follows a \textit{Centralized Reflection, Decentralized Execution} design: edge agents execute locally using subgoal-oriented hierarchical memory and selective re-expansion of relevant histories, while a cloud-side LLM critic asynchronously evaluates completed trajectories, filters reusable experience, and aggregates cross-agent guidance keyed by semantic subgoal identifiers. Across five long-horizon agent tasks spanning symbolic planning and text interaction, \textsc{CoMIC} improves progress rate and action grounding for weak edge agents and yields task-dependent success-rate gains without updating model parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CoMIC, a parameter-update-free cloud-edge framework for long-horizon LLM agents following a Centralized Reflection, Decentralized Execution design. Edge agents use subgoal-oriented hierarchical memory and selective history re-expansion for local execution, while a cloud-side LLM critic asynchronously evaluates trajectories, filters reusable experience, and provides cross-agent guidance keyed by semantic subgoals. Empirical evaluation across five tasks in symbolic planning and text interaction claims improvements in progress rate and action grounding for weak edge agents, plus task-dependent success-rate gains.

Significance. If the reported gains are robust and causally attributable to the critic-driven memory circulation, the work could enable scalable deployment of persistent-memory LLM agents on resource-constrained edge nodes without fine-tuning, addressing a practical bottleneck in cloud-edge agentic systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experiments] Experiments section: no ablation isolates the cloud critic (e.g., random guidance, critic-disabled, or noisy-filter baselines). This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the design explicitly depends on the critic reliably filtering reusable experience and producing useful cross-agent guidance; without these controls the attribution of progress-rate and grounding gains to CoMIC cannot be verified.
  2. [Abstract and Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the manuscript provides no details on baselines, controls, statistical significance testing, or trajectory evaluation protocol. This prevents assessment of whether the claimed improvements on the five tasks are supported by the data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of experimental validation that we will address in the revision to strengthen the attribution of results to the proposed framework.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: no ablation isolates the cloud critic (e.g., random guidance, critic-disabled, or noisy-filter baselines). This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the design explicitly depends on the critic reliably filtering reusable experience and producing useful cross-agent guidance; without these controls the attribution of progress-rate and grounding gains to CoMIC cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that isolating the cloud critic's contribution is necessary to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript, we will add ablations including a critic-disabled baseline (local execution only) and a random-guidance baseline (unfiltered or randomized cross-agent insights). These controls will directly test whether the observed gains in progress rate and action grounding stem from the critic-driven filtering and circulation mechanism. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the manuscript provides no details on baselines, controls, statistical significance testing, or trajectory evaluation protocol. This prevents assessment of whether the claimed improvements on the five tasks are supported by the data.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of these details in the current version. The revised Experiments section will explicitly describe the baselines (including standard LLM agent configurations without CoMIC), the full trajectory evaluation protocol, the controls employed, and statistical significance testing (e.g., results across multiple independent runs with reported means, variances, and p-values where appropriate). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical system proposal without derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript describes an architectural framework (Centralized Reflection, Decentralized Execution) and reports task-dependent empirical gains on five agent benchmarks. No equations, first-principles derivations, parameter-fitting steps, or predictions that reduce to inputs by construction appear in the text. Claims rest on external experimental outcomes rather than self-referential definitions or self-citation chains that close the argument. The central assumption about critic reliability is an untested empirical premise, not a circular reduction. This is the normal case of a self-contained systems paper evaluated against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5722 in / 984 out tokens · 14431 ms · 2026-06-28T18:39:20.259495+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Introducing apple’s on-device and server foundation models, 2025

    Accessed April. Introducing apple’s on-device and server foundation models, 2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    Cosmac: A benchmark for evaluating communication and coordination in llm-based agents

    Anatolii Borzilov, Alexey Skrynnik, and Aleksandr Panov. Cosmac: A benchmark for evaluating communication and coordination in llm-based agents. InLLM-based Multi-Agent Systems: Towards Responsible, Reliable, and Scalable Agentic Systems, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Agentboard: An analytical evaluation board of multi-turn llm agents.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:74325–74362, 2024

    Ma Chang, Junlei Zhang, Zhihao Zhu, Cheng Yang, Yujiu Yang, Yaohui Jin, Zhenzhong Lan, Lingpeng Kong, and Junxian He. Agentboard: An analytical evaluation board of multi-turn llm agents.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:74325–74362, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Mistral 7B

    Devendra Singh Chaplot. Albert q. jiang, alexandre sablayrolles, arthur mensch, chris bamford, devendra singh chaplot, diego de las casas, florian bressand, gianna lengyel, guillaume lample, lucile saulnier, lélio renard lavaud, marie-anne lachaux, pierre stock, teven le scao, thibaut lavril, thomas wang, timothée lacroix, william el sayed.arXiv preprint ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Towards transmission-friendly and robust cnn models over cloud and device.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 22(10):6176–6189, 2022

    Chuntao Ding, Zhichao Lu, Felix Juefei-Xu, Vishnu Naresh Boddeti, Yidong Li, and Jiannong Cao. Towards transmission-friendly and robust cnn models over cloud and device.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 22(10):6176–6189, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Hiagent: Hierarchical working memory management for solving long-horizon agent tasks with large lan- guage model

    Mengkang Hu, Tianxing Chen, Qiguang Chen, Yao Mu, Wenqi Shao, and Ping Luo. Hiagent: Hierarchical working memory management for solving long-horizon agent tasks with large lan- guage model. InProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 32779–32798, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Cross-task experiential learning on llm-based multi-agent collaboration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23187, 2025

    Yilong Li, Chen Qian, Yu Xia, Ruijie Shi, Yufan Dang, Zihao Xie, Ziming You, Weize Chen, Cheng Yang, Weichuan Liu, et al. Cross-task experiential learning on llm-based multi-agent collaboration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23187, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Optimizing ai service placement and resource allocation in mobile edge intelligence systems.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 20(11):7257–7271, 2021

    Zehong Lin, Suzhi Bi, and Ying-Jun Angela Zhang. Optimizing ai service placement and resource allocation in mobile edge intelligence systems.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 20(11):7257–7271, 2021

    2021

  9. [9]

    Mobilellm: Optimizing sub-billion parameter language models for on-device use cases

    Zechun Liu, Changsheng Zhao, Forrest Iandola, Chen Lai, Yuandong Tian, Igor Fedorov, Yunyang Xiong, Ernie Chang, Yangyang Shi, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, et al. Mobilellm: Optimizing sub-billion parameter language models for on-device use cases. InForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

    2024

  10. [10]

    GPT-4 Technical Report

    R OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arxiv 2303.08774.View in Article, 2(5):1, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Mobile edge intelligence for large language models: A contemporary survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    Guanqiao Qu, Qiyuan Chen, Wei Wei, Zheng Lin, Xianhao Chen, and Kaibin Huang. Mobile edge intelligence for large language models: A contemporary survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    2025

  12. [12]

    Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:8634–8652, 2023

    Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:8634–8652, 2023

    2023

  13. [13]

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    A survey on large language model based autonomous agents.Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6):186345, 2024

    Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents.Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6):186345, 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind

    Daniel M Wegner. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Theories of group behavior, pages 185–208. Springer, 1987

    1987

  16. [16]

    The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey.Science China Information Sciences, 68(2):121101, 2025

    Zhiheng Xi, Wenxiang Chen, Xin Guo, Wei He, Yiwen Ding, Boyang Hong, Ming Zhang, Junzhe Wang, Senjie Jin, Enyu Zhou, et al. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey.Science China Information Sciences, 68(2):121101, 2025. 10

    2025

  17. [17]

    Agentgym: Evaluating and training large language model-based agents across diverse environments

    Zhiheng Xi, Yiwen Ding, Wenxiang Chen, Boyang Hong, Honglin Guo, Junzhe Wang, Xin Guo, Dingwen Yang, Chenyang Liao, Wei He, et al. Agentgym: Evaluating and training large language model-based agents across diverse environments. InProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 27914–27...

    2025

  18. [18]

    Unleashing the power of edge-cloud generative ai in mobile networks: A survey of aigc services.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(2):1127–1170, 2024

    Minrui Xu, Hongyang Du, Dusit Niyato, Jiawen Kang, Zehui Xiong, Shiwen Mao, Zhu Han, Abbas Jamalipour, Dong In Kim, Xuemin Shen, et al. Unleashing the power of edge-cloud generative ai in mobile networks: A survey of aigc services.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(2):1127–1170, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. InThe eleventh international conference on learning representations, 2022

    2022

  20. [20]

    Enhancing llm qos through cloud- edge collaboration: A diffusion-based multi-agent reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025

    Zhi Yao, Zhiqing Tang, Wenmian Yang, and Weijia Jia. Enhancing llm qos through cloud- edge collaboration: A diffusion-based multi-agent reinforcement learning approach.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025

    2025

  21. [21]

    Agenttuning: Enabling generalized agent abilities for llms

    Aohan Zeng, Mingdao Liu, Rui Lu, Bowen Wang, Xiao Liu, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. Agenttuning: Enabling generalized agent abilities for llms. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 3053–3077, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    A survey on the memory mechanism of large language model-based agents

    Zeyu Zhang, Quanyu Dai, Xiaohe Bo, Chen Ma, Rui Li, Xu Chen, Jieming Zhu, Zhenhua Dong, and Ji-Rong Wen. A survey on the memory mechanism of large language model-based agents. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 43(6):1–47, 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    Learn to memorize: Optimizing llm-based agents with adaptive memory framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.16629, 2025

    Zeyu Zhang, Quanyu Dai, Rui Li, Xiaohe Bo, Xu Chen, and Zhenhua Dong. Learn to memorize: Optimizing llm-based agents with adaptive memory framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.16629, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    A llm-based controllable, scalable, human-involved user simulator framework for conversational recommender systems

    Lixi Zhu, Xiaowen Huang, and Jitao Sang. A llm-based controllable, scalable, human-involved user simulator framework for conversational recommender systems. InProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, pages 4653–4661, 2025. 11 A Related Work LLM Agents in Cloud-Edge Systems.Cloud-based large language models (LLMs) can lever- age abundant computationa...

    work page arXiv 2025