Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking

As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 15 of 15 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.01120.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2606.01120 v2

Coverage vector

measured 15 of 15 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

measured 15 of 15 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

15 of 15 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact2
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved10
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier1
  • metadata mismatch2

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 3feb16be-6b61-45b7-b4bd-557b2de77ed4 · outbound

This paper cites Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?

Reference 1

Resolution
metadata mismatch
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-01T20:46:14.224063Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:3d9a6d0ea8f249aa82d5878d0db995a0d7577333a44fcc9bb6fcadb414d6a948

Observation 1a17329e-ba15-493b-885d-3de96330ef47 · outbound

This paper cites InProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, pages 7052–7063, Online and Punta Cana, Do- minican Republic.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking InProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, pages 7052–7063, Online and Punta Cana, Do- minican Republic

Reference 2

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:9ec9c482ebe8ce1b957ae13f982640d70de64f84026fe7003decb4145b1e6ceb

Observation 0e0f1ea6-5ecb-4aba-a35e-6f97724b7fe9 · outbound

This paper cites Factual Confidence of LLMs: on Reliability and Robustness of Current Estimators.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Factual Confidence of LLMs: on Reliability and Robustness of Current Estimators

Reference 3

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-01T20:46:14.226530Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:13805a6202da61e80455be21d92ee4ec9b0f0a910fc6881e0c9a9ea43b65a915

Observation 23933543-86f2-40e0-a08e-2636298b9b1e · outbound

This paper cites InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8420–8436, Bangkok, Thailand.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8420–8436, Bangkok, Thailand

Reference 4

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:8b5c2f7e0eb94da0ee1a0e1faf247aad64536237a6e2c6fde589a1318dbccf3a

Observation e84f25f2-a6ef-4f85-bee3-84b3cb4a5ee7 · outbound

This paper cites ConflictBank: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Influence of Knowledge Conflicts in LLM.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking ConflictBank: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Influence of Knowledge Conflicts in LLM

Reference 5

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-01T20:46:14.224252Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:852879152f5e19b9a42e0f4782f106c285017fe2e293bc2fdfcadd9cfaa6c459

Observation fdc28b91-c1d9-4ac0-abe0-f791d7f4c0f2 · outbound

This paper cites KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models

Reference 6

Resolution
metadata mismatch
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-01T20:46:14.229166Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:9b7dbcded75802f37fd2669f8c998333764b98c4cd144af70053c29a890f3f42

Observation 35c98c93-6262-4a4c-be9b-84f0681ec2df · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Unresolved cited work

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:da2a1502435e3d44ed5174775152207f92f4f3f49747657d53d771d9e0accc67

Observation 1a2daea0-b809-4a5f-a201-82289a50f61b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:865d8cf48d31363500b8d588338c376e80b6523f77f7470034037551b3d5243f

Observation 33c0dd26-9493-416f-aaa9-317c14392616 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Unresolved cited work

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:81cc26062cfb48ce46f6a6020f6f58a09938fc8c8140d8657d21d0d4b14f15d2

Observation 9f5cc02c-892f-481f-866c-ff3af684f815 · outbound

This paper cites Appendix A.5 presents hallucination cases where models over-confidently extrapolate be- yond their verified knowledge boundaries, fur- ther motivating prior-aware arbitration.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Appendix A.5 presents hallucination cases where models over-confidently extrapolate be- yond their verified knowledge boundaries, fur- ther motivating prior-aware arbitration

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:b145f34e2996bd24b9c4157712274061829c1fe036875ca2e331020ef1475828

Observation 42fcfeaf-718a-4991-9a11-22bfbff520ef · outbound

This paper cites Sup- port.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Sup- port

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:e49d46407db99458e9e84ea07fb082d8cfb7db095988f5e2f22a54fda81d60ce

Observation 804f55fc-f2c7-4273-8cb9-f73cf97c0fe8 · outbound

This paper cites complete college.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking complete college

Reference 12

Resolution
malformed identifier
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:24edc290a9ddf2e3415638c89029946cb8491fe517bd843ca4b277d6838a8ed2

Observation e0510a8c-8d48-478d-8f0b-ce900d10acf9 · outbound

This paper cites Break down your reasoning process and assess the confidence level of your original answer, explaining why you believe your answer is correct.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Break down your reasoning process and assess the confidence level of your original answer, explaining why you believe your answer is correct

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:1c0b0f235ed7a371d1246d8136bd6853a178395256e06ab41e7eaff972afb76d

Observation 59c3aad9-87fd-4950-a536-957fafa686fc · outbound

This paper cites Determine whether the evidence contains deceptive or unreliable information, considering possible contradictions or inconsistencies.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking Determine whether the evidence contains deceptive or unreliable information, considering possible contradictions or inconsistencies

Reference 14

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:e4ef12fd22ffc6a0a4d9e9bd065426cd9d7872acd0a07fd231631cf680b20b52

Observation 50ab4032-4a4b-4955-9989-a752bf5b83c0 · outbound

This paper cites True" if the model’s answer is correct, and.

Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking True" if the model’s answer is correct, and

Reference 15

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z digest=sha256:52a7d8d7de8a8f72fdf08ef1afbc04304acc7dd0e9b74c9e844636681e7c0953

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.