pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01318 · v1 · pith:I2REJ2XUnew · submitted 2026-05-31 · 🪐 quant-ph

Entangled Two-Photon Absorption in Cesium Atoms and the Limitations of the Far-Off-Resonance Approximation

Michael Caracas N\'u\~nez , Dario Egloff , Mayerlin Nu\~nez Portela This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 16:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords entangled two-photon absorptioncesium atomsfar-off-resonance approximationenhancement factorspontaneous parametric down-conversionjoint spectral amplitudedecoherence effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Without the far-off-resonance approximation the entangled two-photon absorption enhancement factor in cesium atoms oscillates with entanglement time and reaches a maximum near 500.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the entangled two-photon absorption cross section for the 6S1/2 to 8S1/2 transition in cesium atoms using photon pairs from spontaneous parametric down-conversion. It evaluates the cross section both with and without the far-off-resonance approximation while including intermediate atomic states and decoherence. With the approximation the enhancement factor remains fixed at 36 pi. Without the approximation the factor varies with the entanglement time of the photon pairs and reaches a peak near 500. These results address gaps between theory and experiment for ETPA rates and supply concrete values for planning measurements in alkali atoms.

Core claim

The ETPA cross section is evaluated with and without the far-off-resonance approximation using the joint spectral amplitude of SPDC photon pairs. The enhancement factor stays constant at 36 pi when the approximation is used. Without the approximation the enhancement factor oscillates as a function of entanglement time and reaches a maximum value of approximately 500.

What carries the argument

The joint spectral amplitude of photon pairs from spontaneous parametric down-conversion, used to compute the ETPA rate with and without the far-off-resonance approximation while summing over intermediate states.

If this is right

  • The far-off-resonance approximation underestimates the largest achievable ETPA enhancement.
  • Discrepancies between calculated and measured ETPA cross sections can arise from near-resonance contributions omitted by the approximation.
  • The computed peak value of ~500 supplies a target for experiments that tune entanglement time in cesium.
  • Decoherence must be retained in any quantitative model if the oscillation is to be observed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same calculation framework could be applied to other alkali atoms to identify transitions where the enhancement peak is even larger.
  • Tuning the entanglement time experimentally could serve as a control knob to maximize absorption rates beyond the constant value given by the approximation.
  • The oscillation may appear in other processes that use entangled light with atoms when intermediate states lie near the photon frequencies.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum state of the light is correctly captured by the joint spectral amplitude of the SPDC photon pairs and the model includes all relevant intermediate atomic states plus decoherence.

What would settle it

Measure the ETPA rate in cesium while scanning the entanglement time of the photon pairs; a constant rate independent of entanglement time would falsify the oscillation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01318 by Dario Egloff, Mayerlin Nu\~nez Portela, Michael Caracas N\'u\~nez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Far-off-resonance ETPA cross section as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ETPA cross section without the far-off-resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ETPA cross section without the far-off-resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Total rate of the TPA and ETPA processes as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic representation of both poles of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Energy levels of the cesium atom relevant for this work. Solid lines represent one-photon transitions. The dashed line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The discrepancies between theoretical and experimental results in the process of entangled two-photon absorption (ETPA) are not fully understood. Atomic systems are a promising alternative for investigating this process without the systematic effects present in molecules. We present a theoretical study of the ETPA process in cesium atoms, focusing on the 6S1/2 --> 8S1/2 transition. The ETPA cross section is evaluated both with and without the far-off-resonance (FOR) approximation, including the contributions from intermediate atomic states and decoherence effects. The quantum state of light considered is described by the joint spectral amplitude of photon-pairs produced by the spontaneous parametric down-conversion process. When the FOR approximation is applied, the enhancement factor is constant (36*pi). In contrast, without this approximation the enhancement factor oscillates with the entanglement time, and achieves a maximum value of ~500. These results show the limitations of approximations when calculating the ETPA cross section and contribute to the understanding of the discrepancies between theoretical and experimental values for the ETPA cross section in different samples. The numbers presented in this work can be a starting point for designing experiments aimed at measuring ETPA cross sections in alkali atoms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that for the entangled two-photon absorption process in cesium atoms on the 6S1/2 to 8S1/2 transition, the enhancement factor remains constant at 36π when the far-off-resonance (FOR) approximation is applied, but oscillates with entanglement time and reaches a maximum of approximately 500 when the approximation is dropped. The calculation incorporates contributions from intermediate atomic states, decoherence effects, and the joint spectral amplitude of photon pairs generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion.

Significance. If the non-FOR result holds after verification, the work would be significant for demonstrating concrete limitations of the FOR approximation in ETPA calculations for atomic systems. It could help account for theory-experiment discrepancies and supply numerical targets for designing measurements in alkali atoms. The explicit comparison of the two regimes and inclusion of decoherence are strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The evaluation with and without the FOR approximation is described, but no derivation steps, error analysis, or explicit checks against the paper's own equations are supplied; the support for the stated maximum of ~500 therefore cannot be verified from the given text.
  2. [Results] The central claim that the non-FOR enhancement reaches ~500 and oscillates rests on the specific joint spectral amplitude and the truncation/parameterization of intermediate states plus decoherence rates. No sensitivity analysis or robustness checks are indicated, so shifts in these inputs could alter or eliminate the reported peak and oscillation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The evaluation with and without the FOR approximation is described, but no derivation steps, error analysis, or explicit checks against the paper's own equations are supplied; the support for the stated maximum of ~500 therefore cannot be verified from the given text.

    Authors: The abstract is intended as a concise summary and does not include detailed derivations or error analyses, consistent with standard journal formatting. The derivations of the ETPA enhancement factor with and without the FOR approximation are provided in full in the main text, specifically in the sections detailing the theoretical model and numerical results. The value of ~500 is obtained from direct numerical integration of the relevant expression using the joint spectral amplitude and atomic parameters specified in the paper. To improve verifiability, we will revise the abstract to include a brief reference to the key equations supporting the reported maximum. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] The central claim that the non-FOR enhancement reaches ~500 and oscillates rests on the specific joint spectral amplitude and the truncation/parameterization of intermediate states plus decoherence rates. No sensitivity analysis or robustness checks are indicated, so shifts in these inputs could alter or eliminate the reported peak and oscillation.

    Authors: We agree that the reported oscillation and maximum value depend on the specific form of the joint spectral amplitude and the selection of intermediate states along with their decoherence rates. The manuscript employs a commonly used Gaussian approximation for the JSA corresponding to SPDC photon pairs and includes the dominant intermediate states with decoherence rates taken from standard atomic data. Although a comprehensive sensitivity study was not presented in the original submission to maintain focus on the primary comparison, we recognize its importance for robustness. In the revised manuscript, we will include an analysis of how variations in the JSA bandwidth, entanglement time sampling, and the number of included intermediate states affect the enhancement factor, confirming that the oscillatory behavior and peak value around 500 persist under reasonable parameter changes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper performs an explicit theoretical evaluation of the ETPA cross section by integrating the atomic response (including intermediate states and decoherence) over the joint spectral amplitude of SPDC photon pairs. The constant 36*pi enhancement under FOR and the oscillating ~500 maximum without FOR are direct numerical outputs of that integration; neither quantity is obtained by fitting a parameter to a data subset and relabeling it a prediction, nor does any load-bearing step reduce to a self-citation, imported ansatz, or self-definitional relation. The derivation therefore remains independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard quantum-optics description of SPDC photon pairs and on the inclusion of intermediate states plus decoherence; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • decoherence rates
    The model includes decoherence effects whose specific values are not given in the abstract and must be chosen or fitted.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The joint spectral amplitude of photon-pairs produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion describes the quantum state of the light.
    Invoked to define the input state for the ETPA calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5757 in / 1269 out tokens · 32553 ms · 2026-06-28T16:45:41.612529+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum state of photon pairs produced by SPDC In this appendix, the biphoton state,|Ψ⟩, and the field correlation function,CF (t1, t2, t3, t4), of the down-converted photons is presented, following the references [35, 39]. The quantum state of the entangled-photon pairs produced in the SPDC process can be written as |Ψ⟩=exp 1 iℏ Z t t0 dt′ ˆHSP DC(t′) |0...

  2. [2]

    (C14) it is necessary to write the wave numbers in terms of the frequenciesω s,ω i andω p

    Computation of the JSA Function To compute the JSA functionΦ(ωs, ωi)in Eq. (C14) it is necessary to write the wave numbers in terms of the frequenciesω s,ω i andω p. Due to the dispersion of the photon pairs in the crystal, the wavenumbers are expanded in a Taylor series around the central frequencies,ω0 and2ω 0 (Eq. (C10)). If the entangled-photon pairs ...

  3. [3]

    (13): CF (t1, t2, t3, t4) =⟨Ψ| ˆE(−)(t1) ˆE(−)(t2)|0⟩⟨0| ˆE(+)(t3) ˆE(+)(t4)|Ψ⟩.(C43) 16 Writing the temporal component of the electric field operator in Eq

    Calculation of the field correlation function Once the biphoton state|Ψ⟩is computed, the field correlation function can be calculated according to Eq. (13): CF (t1, t2, t3, t4) =⟨Ψ| ˆE(−)(t1) ˆE(−)(t2)|0⟩⟨0| ˆE(+)(t3) ˆE(+)(t4)|Ψ⟩.(C43) 16 Writing the temporal component of the electric field operator in Eq. (C5), the inner products can be computed as foll...

  4. [4]

    17 Appendix D: ETPA Cross-Section

    Also, we can define the flux of photon pairs in a timeTproduced by the SPDC process asϕ= 2|ε| 2/A0T, where the factor of2comes from the fact that we have photon pairs. 17 Appendix D: ETPA Cross-Section

  5. [5]

    ETPA probability The ETPA probability in Eq. (8) can be written as pg→f = 1 ℏ4 Z t −∞ dt4 Z t4 −∞ dt3 Z t3 −∞ dt2 Z t2 −∞ dt1CF (t1, t2, t3, t4)CA(t1, t2, t3, t4) +c.c..(D1) The time integrals are performed considering the expressions for the correlation functions in Eqs. (12) and (21). The ETPA probability can be expressed as follows considering the chan...

  6. [6]

    ETPA Cross-Section in the Far-Off-Resonance Approximation In this section we compute the integrals in Eq. (D2) considering the Far-Off-Resonance approximation, therefore, Ie,e′ = 1 (−ωf e′ +ω 0)(ωeg −ω 0) Z ∞ −∞ dω′ s Z ∞ −∞ dωs Z ∞ −∞ dωi ˜Φ∗(ω′ s, ω′ i)˜Φ(ωs, ωi) γf g −iω f g +iω s +iω i +c.c.(D4) Considering the sum with complex conjugate term and the ...

  7. [7]

    ETPA Cross Section without the Far-Off resonance approximation In this section we compute integrals in Eq. (D2) such thatIe,e′ is Ie,e′ = Z ∞ −∞ dω′ s Z ∞ −∞ dωs Z ∞ −∞ dωp ˜Φ∗(ω′ s, ωp −ω ′ s)˜Φ(ωs, ωp −ω s) [γf e′ +i(ω p −ω s −ω f e′)][γf g +i(ω p −ω f g)][γeg +i(ω ′s −ω eg)] +c.c.(D15) In order to simplify the integral, we write it in terms of the detu...

  8. [8]

    Varnavski, S

    O. Varnavski, S. K. Giri, T.-M. Chiang, C. J. I. Zeman, G. C. Schatz, and T. I. Goodson, Colors of entangled two-photon absorption, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2307719120 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear optical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 045008 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    F.Schlawin, K.E.Dorfman,andS.Mukamel,Entangledtwo-photonabsorptionspectroscopy,Accountsofchemicalresearch 51, 2207 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    Gilaberte Basset, F

    M. Gilaberte Basset, F. Setzpfandt, F. Steinlechner, E. Beckert, T. Pertsch, and M. Gräfe, Perspectives for applications of quantum imaging, Laser & Photonics Reviews13, 1900097 (2019). 22 Transition Frequency [THz] dij [10−10 m] Branching Ratio Ref. Decay Rate ×106[rad/s] Ref. 6S1/2 →6P 1/2 335.116048807(41) 1.6840 1 [40, 41]2π·4.5612[41] 6S1/2 →6P 3/2 3...

    arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Szoke, H

    S. Szoke, H. Liu, B. P. Hickam, M. He, and S. K. Cushing, Entangled light–matter interactions and spectroscopy, Journal of Materials Chemistry C8, 10732 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Varnavski and T

    O. Varnavski and T. Goodson III, Two-photon fluorescence microscopy at extremely low excitation intensity: The power of quantum correlations, Journal of the American Chemical Society142, 12966 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    R. B. K. C., D. R. Graupner, N. Fedik, S. Tretiak, D. Ryan, and J. Werner, Entangled two-photon absorption cross-section measurements for biologically important fluorophores, inProceedings of SPIE, Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging XXIII, Vol. 13618 (SPIE, 2025) p. 136180B

    2025

  15. [15]

    Schlawin, Two-photon absorption cross sections of pulsed entangled beams, The Journal of Chemical Physics160, 144117 (2024)

    F. Schlawin, Two-photon absorption cross sections of pulsed entangled beams, The Journal of Chemical Physics160, 144117 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    J. P. Villabona-Monsalve, O. Calderón-Losada, M. Nuñez Portela, and A. Valencia, Entangled two photon absorption cross section on the 808 nm region for the common dyes zinc tetraphenylporphyrin and rhodamine b, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A121, 7869 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    J. P. Villabona-Monsalve, O. Varnavski, B. A. Palfey, and T. G. III, Two-photon excitation of flavins and flavoproteins with classical and quantum light, Journal of the American Chemical Society140, 14562 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    Corona-Aquino, O

    S. Corona-Aquino, O. Calderón-Losada, M. Y. Li-Gómez, H. Cruz-Ramirez, V. Álvarez-Venicio, M. d. P. Carreón-Castro, R. de J. León-Montiel, and A. B. U’Ren, Experimental study of the validity of entangled two-photon absorption measure- ments in organic compounds, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A126, 2185 (2022), pMID: 35383460

    2022

  19. [19]

    Tabakaev, M

    D. Tabakaev, M. Montagnese, G. Haack, L. Bonacina, J.-P. Wolf, H. Zbinden, and R. Thew, Energy-time-entangled two-photon molecular absorption, Physical Review A103, 033701 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Tabakaev, A

    D. Tabakaev, A. Djorović, L. La Volpe, G. Gaulier, S. Ghosh, L. Bonacina, J.-P. Wolf, H. Zbinden, and R. Thew, Spatial properties of entangled two-photon absorption, Physical Review Letters129, 183601 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    M. He, B. P. Hickam, N. Harper, and S. K. Cushing, Experimental upper bounds for resonance-enhanced entangled two-photon absorption cross section of indocyanine green, The Journal of Chemical Physics160, 094305 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    K. M. Parzuchowski, A. Mikhaylov, M. D. Mazurek, R. N. Wilson, D. J. Lum, T. Gerrits, C. H. Camp Jr, M. J. Stevens, and R. Jimenez, Setting bounds on entangled two-photon absorption cross sections in common fluorophores, Physical Review Applied15, 044012 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    B. P. Hickam, M. He, N. Harper, S. Szoke, and S. K. Cushing, Single-photon scattering can account for the discrepancies among entangled two-photon measurement techniques, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 4934 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Landes, B

    T. Landes, B. J. Smith, and M. G. Raymer, Limitations in fluorescence-detected entangled two-photon-absorption experi- ments: Exploring the low-to high-gain squeezing regimes, Physical Review A110, 033708 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    H.-B. Fei, B. M. Jost, S. Popescu, B. E. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Entanglement-induced two-photon transparency, Physical review letters78, 1679 (1997)

    1997

  26. [26]

    Landes, M

    T. Landes, M. G. Raymer, M. Allgaier, S. Merkouche, B. J. Smith, and A. H. Marcus, Quantifying the enhancement of two-photon absorption due to spectral-temporal entanglement, Optics Express29, 20022 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    Rodríguez-Camargo, H

    C. Rodríguez-Camargo, H. Gestsson, C. Nation, A. Jones, and A. Olaya-Castro, Perturbation-theory approach for predict- ing vibronic selectivity by entangled-photon-pair absorption, Physical Review A111, 063101 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    R. K. Burdick, O. Varnavski, A. Molina, P. M. Zimmerman, L. Upton, and T. G. III, Predicting and controlling entangled two-photon absorption in diatomic molecules, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A122, 8198 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    M. G. Raymer, T. Landes, M. Allgaier, S. Merkouche, B. J. Smith, and A. H. Marcus, How large is the quantum enhance- ment of two-photon absorption by time-frequency entanglement of photon pairs?, Optica8, 757 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Drago and J

    C. Drago and J. Sipe, Aspects of two-photon absorption of squeezed light: The continuous-wave limit, Physical Review A 106, 023115 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Dayan, A

    B. Dayan, A. Pe’Er, A. A. Friesem, and Y. Silberberg, Two photon absorption and coherent control with broadband down-converted light, Physical review letters93, 023005 (2004). 23

    2004

  32. [32]

    N. P. Georgiades, E. Polzik, K. Edamatsu, H. Kimble, and A. Parkins, Nonclassical excitation for atoms in a squeezed vacuum, Physical review letters75, 3426 (1995)

    1995

  33. [33]

    Dayan, Theory of two-photon interactions with broadband down-converted light and entangled photons, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics76, 043813 (2007)

    B. Dayan, Theory of two-photon interactions with broadband down-converted light and entangled photons, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics76, 043813 (2007)

    2007

  34. [34]

    de J León-Montiel, J

    R. de J León-Montiel, J. Svozilik, L. Salazar-Serrano, and J. P. Torres, Role of the spectral shape of quantum correlations in two-photon virtual-state spectroscopy, New Journal of Physics15, 053023 (2013)

    2013

  35. [35]

    Du, Atomic-resonance-enhanced nonlinear optical frequency conversion with entangled photon pairs, Physical Review A83, 033807 (2011)

    S. Du, Atomic-resonance-enhanced nonlinear optical frequency conversion with entangled photon pairs, Physical Review A83, 033807 (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    M. C. Núñez, M. A. Gonzalez, and M. N. Portela, Theoretical and experimental study of the 6s-8s two-photon absorption cross-section in cesium atoms, Opt. Express31, 31749 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    M. G. Raymer, T. Landes, and A. H. Marcus, Entangled two-photon absorption by atoms and molecules: A quantum optics tutorial, The Journal of Chemical Physics155, 10.1063/5.0049338 (2021), 081501

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0049338 2021

  38. [38]

    Loudon,The quantum theory of light(OUP Oxford, 2000)

    R. Loudon,The quantum theory of light(OUP Oxford, 2000)

    2000

  39. [39]

    Kubo, A stochastic theory of line shape, inAdvances in Chemical Physics, Vol

    R. Kubo, A stochastic theory of line shape, inAdvances in Chemical Physics, Vol. 15, edited by K. E. Shuler (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1969) pp. 101–127

    1969

  40. [40]

    Javanainen and P

    J. Javanainen and P. L. Gould, Linear intensity dependence of a two-photon transition rate, Physical Review A41, 5088 (1990)

    1990

  41. [41]

    R. W. Boyd,Nonlinear optics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, 2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Shih, Entangled biphoton source - property and preparation, Reports on Progress in Physics66, 1009 (2003)

    Y. Shih, Entangled biphoton source - property and preparation, Reports on Progress in Physics66, 1009 (2003)

    2003

  43. [43]

    Couteau, Spontaneous parametric down-conversion, Contemporary Physics59, 291 (2018)

    C. Couteau, Spontaneous parametric down-conversion, Contemporary Physics59, 291 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight,Introductory Quantum Optics Christopher Gerry; Peter Knight(Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005)

    2005

  45. [45]

    K. J. Blow, R. Loudon, S. J. D. Phoenix, and T. J. Shepherd, Continuum fields in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. A42, 4102 (1990)

    1990

  46. [46]

    W. P. Grice and I. A. Walmsley, Spectral information and distinguishability in type-ii down-conversion with a broadband pump, Physical Review A56, 1627 (1997)

    1997

  47. [47]

    T. Udem, J. Reichert, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, Absolute Optical Frequency Measurement of the CesiumD1 Line with a Mode-Locked Laser, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3568 (1999)

    1999

  48. [48]

    Steck, Cesium D line data (1998)

    D. Steck, Cesium D line data (1998)

    1998

  49. [49]

    T. Udem, J. Reichert, T. W. Hänsch, and M. Kourogi, Absolute optical frequency measurement of the cesiumD2 line, Phys. Rev. A62, 031801 (2000)

    2000

  50. [50]

    J. E. Sansonetti, Wavelengths, transition probabilities, and energy levels for the spectra of cesium (csi–cslv), Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data38, 761 (2009)

    2009

  51. [51]

    Antypas and D

    D. Antypas and D. S. Elliott, Measurement of the radial matrix elements of the6s2S1/2 →7p 2PJ transitions in atomic cesium, Phys. Rev. A88, 052516 (2013)

    2013

  52. [52]

    G.Toh, N.Chalus, A.Burgess, A.Damitz, P.Imany, D.E.Leaird, A.M.Weiner, C.E.Tanner,andD.Elliott,Measurement of the lifetimes of the 7 p 2 p 3/2 and 7 p 2 p 1/2 states of atomic cesium, Physical Review A100, 052507 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    Gunawardena, D

    M. Gunawardena, D. S. Elliott, M. S. Safronova, and U. Safronova, Determination of the static polarizability of the8s2S1/2 state of atomic cesium, Phys. Rev. A75, 022507 (2007)

    2007

  54. [54]

    Horbatsch, E

    M. Horbatsch, E. Hessels, and M. Horbatsch, Classical calculation of the lifetimes and branching ratios for radiative decays of hydrogenic atoms, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics71, 020501 (2005)

    2005

  55. [55]

    Alessandretti, F

    G. Alessandretti, F. Chiarini, G. Gorini, and F. Petrucci, Measurement of the Cs 8S-level lifetime, Optics Communications 20, 289 (1977)

    1977

  56. [56]

    Wu, T.-W

    C.-M. Wu, T.-W. Liu, M.-H. Wu, R.-K. Lee, and W.-Y. Cheng, Absolute frequency of cesium 6S-8S 822 nm two-photon transition by a high-resolution scheme, Opt. Lett.38, 3186 (2013)

    2013

  57. [57]

    Corney,Atomic and laser spectroscopy(Clarendon Press Oxford, 1978)

    A. Corney,Atomic and laser spectroscopy(Clarendon Press Oxford, 1978)

    1978

  58. [58]

    Foot, Atomic physics (Oxford University Press, 2005) Chap

    C. Foot, Atomic physics (Oxford University Press, 2005) Chap. 7

    2005

  59. [59]

    Téllez, Métodos matemáticos, Ediciones Uniandes , 67 (2004)

    G. Téllez, Métodos matemáticos, Ediciones Uniandes , 67 (2004)

    2004

  60. [60]

    Krstić, T

    A. Krstić, T. B. Gäbler, N. Jain, P. Then, V. F. Gili, S. Saravi, F. Setzpfandt, C. Eggeling, and M. Gräfe, Enhancing entangled two-photon absorption of nile red via temperature-controlled spdc, APL Quantum2, 016108 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Krauss-Kodytek, C

    L. Krauss-Kodytek, C. Ruppert, and M. Betz, Near-infrared non-degenerate two-photon absorption coefficients of bulk gaas and si, Opt. Express29, 34522 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    Á.Martínez-Tapia, S.Corona-Aquino, F.Triana-Arango, C.You, R.-B.Jin, O.S.Magaña-Loaiza, S.-H.Dong, A.B.U’Ren, and R. d. J. León-Montiel, Witnessing entangled two-photon absorption via quantum interferometry, APL Photonics8, 036104 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    Mikhaylov, R

    A. Mikhaylov, R. N. Wilson, K. M. Parzuchowski, M. D. Mazurek, C. H. Camp Jr, M. J. Stevens, and R. Jimenez, Hot-band absorption can mimic entangled two-photon absorption, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 1489 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Barra and P

    H. Oka, Two-photon absorption by spectrally shaped entangled photons, Physical Review A97, 10.1103/Phys- RevA.97.033814 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2018

  65. [65]

    Pandya, P

    R. Pandya, P. Cameron, C. Vernière, B. Courme, S. Ithurria, A. Chin, E. Lhuillier, and H. Defienne, Towards robust detection of entangled two-photon absorption, arXiv: Quantum Physics9, e2410.06199 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Peřina Jr, B

    J. Peřina Jr, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Multiphoton absorption cross section and virtual-state spectroscopy for the entangledn-photon state, Physical Review A57, 3972 (1998). 24

    1998

  67. [67]

    B. E. Saleh, B. M. Jost, H.-B. Fei, and M. C. Teich, Entangled-photon virtual-state spectroscopy, Physical review letters 80, 3483 (1998)

    1998

  68. [68]

    Schlawin, K

    F. Schlawin, K. Dorfman, and S. Mukamel, Pump-probe spectroscopy using quantum light with two-photon coincidence detection, Physical Review A93, 023807 (2016)

    2016

  69. [69]

    Upton, M

    L. Upton, M. Harpham, O. Suzer, M. Richter, S. Mukamel, and T. Goodson III, Optically excited entangled states in organic molecules illuminate the dark, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters4, 2046 (2013)

    2046