Hydrogen trapping and interfacial decohesion at the {\alpha}-Al2O3(0001)/Fe(110) interface

Norihito Sakaguchi; Youngseok Hwang; Yuji Kunisada

arxiv: 2606.01748 · v1 · pith:U3U4WB5Unew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Hydrogen trapping and interfacial decohesion at the {α}-Al2O3(0001)/Fe(110) interface

Youngseok Hwang , Norihito Sakaguchi , Yuji Kunisada This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 14:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords hydrogen trappinginterfacial decohesionalumina-iron interfacecleavage energytritium permeation barrierdensity functional theoryhydrogen embrittlementfusion reactor materials

0 comments

The pith

High hydrogen concentrations turn the cleavage energy of the alumina-iron interface negative, enabling spontaneous exfoliation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how hydrogen atoms interact with the interface between alpha-alumina and iron, relevant to tritium barriers in fusion reactors. Density functional theory calculations show single hydrogen atoms prefer iron hollow sites for stability. As more hydrogen accumulates, available free volume shrinks and lattice distortion grows. The energy required to cleave the interface decreases steadily with added hydrogen. At high concentrations this energy becomes negative, meaning the layers separate without external input.

Core claim

Multi-hydrogen analysis demonstrates that trapping behavior is concentration-dependent; increasing hydrogen concentration progressively reduces the available free volume and increases local lattice distortion. As a result, simulated cleavage processes show a monotonic decrease in cleavage energy with accumulation. At high hydrogen concentrations, cleavage energy turns negative, indicating spontaneous interfacial exfoliation.

What carries the argument

Concentration-dependent hydrogen trapping at the Fe-hollow site, which reduces free volume and drives monotonic decline in cleavage energy until it turns negative.

If this is right

Single-hydrogen incorporation is most stable at the Fe-hollow site due to local free volume and heterogeneous bonding.
Multi-hydrogen trapping progressively reduces free volume and increases local lattice distortion.
Cleavage energy decreases monotonically as hydrogen concentration rises.
At high hydrogen concentrations the interface undergoes spontaneous exfoliation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Hydrogen-driven interface failure could be a primary route to tritium leakage through oxide barriers on steel.
Interface modifications that preserve positive cleavage energy at elevated hydrogen levels might extend barrier lifetime.
The same concentration-driven decohesion process may apply to other oxide-metal pairs exposed to hydrogen.

Load-bearing premise

The density functional theory setup and chosen interface model correctly capture the real multi-hydrogen interactions, lattice distortions, and cleavage energetics without significant errors from exchange-correlation functional choice or finite-size effects.

What would settle it

Direct experimental observation of stable positive cleavage energy or absence of exfoliation at high hydrogen concentrations in the alumina-iron system would falsify the spontaneous exfoliation prediction.

read the original abstract

Hydrogen embrittlement and tritium leakage pose critical challenges for fusion reactor structural components, rendering {\alpha}-Al2O3/Fe interfaces vital as tritium permeation barriers. Here, the thermodynamic stability, trapping energetics, and hydrogen-induced decohesion at the {\alpha}-Al2O3 (0001)/Fe(110) interface were systematically investigated using density functional theory. Single-hydrogen incorporation reveals that the Fe-hollow site is the most stable trapping region, owing to local free volume and heterogeneous interfacial bonding. Multi-hydrogen analysis demonstrates that trapping behavior is concentration-dependent; increasing hydrogen concentration progressively reduces the available free volume and increases local lattice distortion. As a result, simulated cleavage processes show a monotonic decrease in cleavage energy with accumulation. At high hydrogen concentrations, cleavage energy turns negative, indicating spontaneous interfacial exfoliation. These quantitative insights clarify the atomistic degradation mechanisms of protective oxide scales, offering a theoretical framework for optimizing high-performance permeation barriers in fusion-relevant steels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports negative cleavage energy at high H coverage for this alumina-iron interface via standard DFT, but the reference slabs may not include relaxed H sites, which could make the sign change an artifact.

read the letter

The central result here is that multi-hydrogen DFT runs on the alpha-Al2O3(0001)/Fe(110) interface show trapping sites filling up with rising concentration, lattice distortion increasing, and cleavage energy dropping until it goes negative. That points to spontaneous exfoliation as a possible failure mode for these oxide barriers in fusion steels.

What the work actually does is map single-H preference to the Fe-hollow site, then track how additional H atoms compete for volume and raise local strain. The concentration trend in trapping and the monotonic drop in cleavage energy are the concrete outputs. These numbers extend earlier single-H interface studies to a multi-H regime on this specific orientation, which is the main incremental step.

The soft spot is the cleavage energy reference. Standard practice requires the separated slabs to have H atoms in their lowest-energy surface sites after cleavage; if the calculation fixes H at the original interface positions or skips full relaxation on the free surfaces, the energy difference becomes artificially negative. The abstract does not mention post-cleavage redistribution, so this needs explicit checking in the methods section. If the full paper does not address it, the spontaneous-exfoliation claim rests on a questionable baseline. Finite-size effects and functional choice are the usual DFT caveats but are secondary here.

The paper is aimed at modelers and engineers working on tritium permeation barriers. Someone needing quantitative site energies or trends for this interface will find usable data points. It is coherent on its own terms and shows clear engagement with the embrittlement problem, so it deserves a serious referee even if the cleavage reference requires revision.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports density functional theory calculations on hydrogen trapping energetics at the α-Al2O3(0001)/Fe(110) interface and the effect of hydrogen concentration on interfacial cleavage. Single-H results identify the Fe-hollow site as most stable; multi-H results show concentration-dependent trapping with increasing lattice distortion; cleavage simulations indicate monotonic decrease in cleavage energy, becoming negative at high H concentrations and implying spontaneous exfoliation.

Significance. If the central results hold after addressing reference-state issues, the work supplies quantitative atomistic data on hydrogen-induced decohesion in oxide/metal interfaces relevant to tritium permeation barriers in fusion steels. The systematic single- and multi-hydrogen approach is a strength when accompanied by documented convergence tests.

major comments (1)

[Cleavage energy calculations] Cleavage energy section (abstract and results on simulated cleavage processes): the definition of cleavage energy as the difference between the intact interface and separated slabs does not state whether the separated-slab reference energies incorporate the lowest-energy H configurations on the newly created Al2O3(0001) and Fe(110) free surfaces. Without this, the reported negative cleavage energies at high concentrations may be an artifact of an artificially high reference, directly affecting the spontaneous-exfoliation claim.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'simulated cleavage processes show a monotonic decrease' should specify the number of H atoms per interface area and the supercell size used for the multi-H series.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment on the cleavage energy definition. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Cleavage energy calculations] Cleavage energy section (abstract and results on simulated cleavage processes): the definition of cleavage energy as the difference between the intact interface and separated slabs does not state whether the separated-slab reference energies incorporate the lowest-energy H configurations on the newly created Al2O3(0001) and Fe(110) free surfaces. Without this, the reported negative cleavage energies at high concentrations may be an artifact of an artificially high reference, directly affecting the spontaneous-exfoliation claim.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not explicitly describe the reference state used for the separated slabs. Our cleavage energies were computed with the separated Al2O3(0001) and Fe(110) slabs each relaxed to their lowest-energy hydrogen configurations (determined via independent surface calculations for each concentration). This choice ensures the reference corresponds to the thermodynamically preferred state after separation. We will revise the Methods and Results sections to state this explicitly, including a brief description of the surface optimization procedure, and add a clarifying sentence in the cleavage energy definition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: cleavage energies computed directly from DFT total energies

full rationale

The paper performs standard first-principles DFT calculations of hydrogen trapping sites and cleavage energies at the interface. Cleavage energy is obtained as the direct energy difference between the intact interface supercell and the two separated slabs, both evaluated with the same DFT setup. No equations, parameters, or self-citations reduce the reported cleavage values to the target quantities by construction. The monotonic decrease and sign change at high H concentration are numerical outputs of the energy evaluations, not algebraic identities or fitted inputs. This is a self-contained computational study against external benchmarks (DFT total energies), warranting score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms listed. The work implicitly rests on standard DFT assumptions whose validity cannot be audited from the provided text.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Density functional theory with standard approximations suffices to describe hydrogen trapping energetics and interfacial cleavage at this metal-oxide boundary
Central to all reported energies and the negative cleavage conclusion; location implicit in the methods summary of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5714 in / 978 out tokens · 28264 ms · 2026-06-28T14:07:17.998748+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Physics principles of inertial confinement fusion and U.S

Hurricane OA, Patel PK, Betti R, Froula DH, Regan SP, Slutz SA, Gomez MR, Sweeney MA. Physics principles of inertial confinement fusion and U.S. program overview. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95;2023:025005. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.025005

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.025005 2023
[2]

Is nuclear fusion a sustainable energy form? Fusion Eng

Bradshaw AM, Hamacher T, Fischer U. Is nuclear fusion a sustainable energy form? Fusion Eng. Des. 86;2011:2770–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.11.040

work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.11.040 2011
[3]

Pinson EA, Langham WA, Physiology and toxicology of tritium in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 10;1957:108–26. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1957.10.1.108

work page doi:10.1152/jappl.1957.10.1.108 1957
[4]

Permeation barriers for hydrogen embrittlement prevention in metals – A review on mechanisms, materials suitability and efficiency

Laadel NE, El Mansori M, Kang N, Marlin S, Boussant-Roux Y. Permeation barriers for hydrogen embrittlement prevention in metals – A review on mechanisms, materials suitability and efficiency. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 48;2023:39955–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.164

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.164 2023
[5]

Hydrogen permeation measurements on alumina

Serra E, Calza Bini A, Cosoli G, Pilloni L. Hydrogen permeation measurements on alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88;2005:15–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00003.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00003.x 2005
[6]

The formation of tritium permeation barriers by CVD

Forcey KS, Perujo A, Reiter F, Lolli-Ceroni PL. The formation of tritium permeation barriers by CVD. J. Nucl. Mater. 200;1993:417–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(93)90319-T

work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(93)90319-t 1993
[7]

Erbium oxide as a new promising tritium permeation barrier

Levchuk D, Levchuk S, Maier H, Bolt H, Suzuki A. Erbium oxide as a new promising tritium permeation barrier. J. Nucl. Mater. 367–70;2007:1033–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.183

work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.183 2007
[8]

Microstructure control and deuterium permeability of erbium oxide coating on ferritic/martensitic steels by metal-organic decomposition

Chikada T, Suzuki A, Tanaka T, Terai T, Muroga T. Microstructure control and deuterium permeability of erbium oxide coating on ferritic/martensitic steels by metal-organic decomposition. Fusion Eng. Des. 85;2010:1537–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.033

work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.033 2010
[9]

Hydrogen transport through thin titanium oxides

Zeng Y, Noel JJ, Norton PR, Shoesmith DW. Hydrogen transport through thin titanium oxides. J. Electroanal. Chem. 649;2010:277–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.06.022

work page doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.06.022 2010
[10]

Characterization of chemical densified coating as tritium permeation barrier

Nakamichi M, Kawamura H, Teratani T. Characterization of chemical densified coating as tritium permeation barrier. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 38;2001:1007–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2001.9715130

work page doi:10.1080/18811248.2001.9715130 2001
[11]

Zeman, M

Perujo A, Reimann J, Feuerstein H, Mancinelli B. The oxidation kinetics of Incoloy 800 and its deuterium permeation behavior. J. Nucl. Mater. 283–7;2000:1292–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 3115(00)00180-X

work page doi:10.1016/s0022- 2000
[12]

Microstructure and deuterium permeation resistance of the oxide scale prepared by initial oxidation method on vacuum solar receiver

Yu Q, Hao L, Li S, He D, Liu X, Jiang L. Microstructure and deuterium permeation resistance of the oxide scale prepared by initial oxidation method on vacuum solar receiver. Solid State Ion. 231;2013:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2012.11.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2012.11.004 2013
[13]

Tritium barriers and tritium diffusion in fusion reactors

Causey RA, Karnesky RA, San Marchi C. Tritium barriers and tritium diffusion in fusion reactors. In: Konings RJM, editor Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012, p. 511–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00116-6

work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-056033-5.00116-6 2012
[14]

Hydrogen permeation in iron–chromium–aluminum (FeCrAl) alloys and the effects of microstructure and surface oxide

Garud YS, Hoffman AK, Rebak RB. Hydrogen permeation in iron–chromium–aluminum (FeCrAl) alloys and the effects of microstructure and surface oxide. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 53;2022:773–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-021-06535-8

work page doi:10.1007/s11661-021-06535-8 2022
[15]

Fast hydrogen diffusion along the Σ7 grain boundary of α- Al2O3: A first-principles study

Wang F, Lai W, Li R, He B, Li S. Fast hydrogen diffusion along the Σ7 grain boundary of α- Al2O3: A first-principles study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 41;2016:22214–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.158

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.158 2016
[16]

Prevent hydrogen damage in α- Cr2O3/α-Fe2O3 (0001) interface

Mi Z, Chen L, Shi C, Gao L, Wang D, Li X, Liu H, Qiao L. Prevent hydrogen damage in α- Cr2O3/α-Fe2O3 (0001) interface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 475;2019:294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.272

work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.272 2019
[17]

First-principles investigation on stability and mobility of hydrogen in α-Al2O3 (0001)/α-Cr2O3 (0001) interface

Zhang B, Sun F, Zhou QL, Liao DM, Wang N, Xue LH, Li HP, Yan YW. First-principles investigation on stability and mobility of hydrogen in α-Al2O3 (0001)/α-Cr2O3 (0001) interface. Fusion Eng. Des. 125;2017:577–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.05.028

work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.05.028 2017
[18]

Kresse and J

Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B. 47;1993:558(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.558 1993
[19]

Kresse and J

Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous- semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B. 49;1994:14251–69. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.14251 1994
[20]

Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set

Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6;1996:15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

work page doi:10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 1996
[21]

Kresse and J

Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 54;1996:11169–86. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 1996
[22]

Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77;1996:3865–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996
[23]

Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations

Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 13;1976:5188–92. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 1976
[24]

A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density

Henkelman G, Arnaldsson A, Jónsson H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput. Mater. Sci. 36;2006:354–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010

work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 2006
[25]

A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias

Tang W, Sanville E, Henkelman G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 21;2009:084204. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204

work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 2009
[26]

A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications

Bader RFW. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem. Rev. 91;1991:893–928. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00005a013

work page doi:10.1021/cr00005a013 1991
[27]

Efficient rotation of local basis functions using real spherical harmonics

Maintz S, Esser M, Dronskowski R. Efficient rotation of local basis functions using real spherical harmonics. Acta Phys. Pol. B. 47;2016:1165–75. https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.47.1165

work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.47.1165 2016
[28]

Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets

Deringer VL, Tchougréeff AL, Dronskowski R. Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets. J. Phys. Chem. A. 115;2011:5461–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202489s

work page doi:10.1021/jp202489s 2011
[29]

VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data

Momma K, Izumi F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44;2011:1272–6. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811038970

work page doi:10.1107/s0021889811038970 2011
[30]

Structure and surface energy of low-index surfaces of stoichiometric α-Al2O3 and α-Cr2O3

Sun J, Stirner T, Matthews A. Structure and surface energy of low-index surfaces of stoichiometric α-Al2O3 and α-Cr2O3. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201;2006:4205–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.061

work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.061 2006
[31]

Precise measurement of the lattice parameters of α-Al2O3 in the temperature range 4.5–250 K using the Mössbauer wavelength standard

Lucht M, Lerche M, Wille HC, Shvyd'ko YV , Rüter HD, Gerdau E, Becker P. Precise measurement of the lattice parameters of α-Al2O3 in the temperature range 4.5–250 K using the Mössbauer wavelength standard. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36;2003:1045–50. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889803011051

work page doi:10.1107/s0021889803011051 2003
[32]

The lattice expansion of iron

Basinski ZS, Hume-Rothery W, Sutton AL. The lattice expansion of iron. Proc. R. Soc. A. 228;1955:417–34. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0102

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1955.0102 1955
[33]

Unveiling the origin of diffusion suppression of hydrogen isotopes at the α-Al2O3(0001)/α-Cr2O3(0001) interfaces

Kunisada Y, Sano R, Sakaguchi N. Unveiling the origin of diffusion suppression of hydrogen isotopes at the α-Al2O3(0001)/α-Cr2O3(0001) interfaces. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 97;2025:1327–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.027

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.027 2025
[34]

First-principles study on the interaction of H interstitials with grain boundaries in α- and γ-Fe

Du YA, Ismer L, Rogal J, Hickel T, Neugebauer J, Drautz R. First-principles study on the interaction of H interstitials with grain boundaries in α- and γ-Fe. Phys. Rev. B. 84;2011:144121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.144121

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.144121 2011
[35]

The Hematite (𝛼-Fe2O3) (0001) Surface: Evidence for Domains of Distinct Chemistry

Wang XG, Weiss W, Shaikhutdinov SK, Ritter M, Petersen M, Wagner F, Schlögl R, Scheffler M. The Hematite (𝛼-Fe2O3) (0001) Surface: Evidence for Domains of Distinct Chemistry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81;1998:1038–41. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1038. Table 1 Average hydrogen formation energy per atom (𝐸f̅ ), estimated formation energy derived from isol...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1038 1998

[1] [1]

Physics principles of inertial confinement fusion and U.S

Hurricane OA, Patel PK, Betti R, Froula DH, Regan SP, Slutz SA, Gomez MR, Sweeney MA. Physics principles of inertial confinement fusion and U.S. program overview. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95;2023:025005. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.025005

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.025005 2023

[2] [2]

Is nuclear fusion a sustainable energy form? Fusion Eng

Bradshaw AM, Hamacher T, Fischer U. Is nuclear fusion a sustainable energy form? Fusion Eng. Des. 86;2011:2770–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.11.040

work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.11.040 2011

[3] [3]

Pinson EA, Langham WA, Physiology and toxicology of tritium in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 10;1957:108–26. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1957.10.1.108

work page doi:10.1152/jappl.1957.10.1.108 1957

[4] [4]

Permeation barriers for hydrogen embrittlement prevention in metals – A review on mechanisms, materials suitability and efficiency

Laadel NE, El Mansori M, Kang N, Marlin S, Boussant-Roux Y. Permeation barriers for hydrogen embrittlement prevention in metals – A review on mechanisms, materials suitability and efficiency. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 48;2023:39955–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.164

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.164 2023

[5] [5]

Hydrogen permeation measurements on alumina

Serra E, Calza Bini A, Cosoli G, Pilloni L. Hydrogen permeation measurements on alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88;2005:15–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00003.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00003.x 2005

[6] [6]

The formation of tritium permeation barriers by CVD

Forcey KS, Perujo A, Reiter F, Lolli-Ceroni PL. The formation of tritium permeation barriers by CVD. J. Nucl. Mater. 200;1993:417–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(93)90319-T

work page doi:10.1016/0022-3115(93)90319-t 1993

[7] [7]

Erbium oxide as a new promising tritium permeation barrier

Levchuk D, Levchuk S, Maier H, Bolt H, Suzuki A. Erbium oxide as a new promising tritium permeation barrier. J. Nucl. Mater. 367–70;2007:1033–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.183

work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.183 2007

[8] [8]

Microstructure control and deuterium permeability of erbium oxide coating on ferritic/martensitic steels by metal-organic decomposition

Chikada T, Suzuki A, Tanaka T, Terai T, Muroga T. Microstructure control and deuterium permeability of erbium oxide coating on ferritic/martensitic steels by metal-organic decomposition. Fusion Eng. Des. 85;2010:1537–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.033

work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.033 2010

[9] [9]

Hydrogen transport through thin titanium oxides

Zeng Y, Noel JJ, Norton PR, Shoesmith DW. Hydrogen transport through thin titanium oxides. J. Electroanal. Chem. 649;2010:277–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.06.022

work page doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.06.022 2010

[10] [10]

Characterization of chemical densified coating as tritium permeation barrier

Nakamichi M, Kawamura H, Teratani T. Characterization of chemical densified coating as tritium permeation barrier. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 38;2001:1007–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2001.9715130

work page doi:10.1080/18811248.2001.9715130 2001

[11] [11]

Zeman, M

Perujo A, Reimann J, Feuerstein H, Mancinelli B. The oxidation kinetics of Incoloy 800 and its deuterium permeation behavior. J. Nucl. Mater. 283–7;2000:1292–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 3115(00)00180-X

work page doi:10.1016/s0022- 2000

[12] [12]

Microstructure and deuterium permeation resistance of the oxide scale prepared by initial oxidation method on vacuum solar receiver

Yu Q, Hao L, Li S, He D, Liu X, Jiang L. Microstructure and deuterium permeation resistance of the oxide scale prepared by initial oxidation method on vacuum solar receiver. Solid State Ion. 231;2013:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2012.11.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2012.11.004 2013

[13] [13]

Tritium barriers and tritium diffusion in fusion reactors

Causey RA, Karnesky RA, San Marchi C. Tritium barriers and tritium diffusion in fusion reactors. In: Konings RJM, editor Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012, p. 511–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00116-6

work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-056033-5.00116-6 2012

[14] [14]

Hydrogen permeation in iron–chromium–aluminum (FeCrAl) alloys and the effects of microstructure and surface oxide

Garud YS, Hoffman AK, Rebak RB. Hydrogen permeation in iron–chromium–aluminum (FeCrAl) alloys and the effects of microstructure and surface oxide. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 53;2022:773–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-021-06535-8

work page doi:10.1007/s11661-021-06535-8 2022

[15] [15]

Fast hydrogen diffusion along the Σ7 grain boundary of α- Al2O3: A first-principles study

Wang F, Lai W, Li R, He B, Li S. Fast hydrogen diffusion along the Σ7 grain boundary of α- Al2O3: A first-principles study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 41;2016:22214–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.158

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.158 2016

[16] [16]

Prevent hydrogen damage in α- Cr2O3/α-Fe2O3 (0001) interface

Mi Z, Chen L, Shi C, Gao L, Wang D, Li X, Liu H, Qiao L. Prevent hydrogen damage in α- Cr2O3/α-Fe2O3 (0001) interface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 475;2019:294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.272

work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.272 2019

[17] [17]

First-principles investigation on stability and mobility of hydrogen in α-Al2O3 (0001)/α-Cr2O3 (0001) interface

Zhang B, Sun F, Zhou QL, Liao DM, Wang N, Xue LH, Li HP, Yan YW. First-principles investigation on stability and mobility of hydrogen in α-Al2O3 (0001)/α-Cr2O3 (0001) interface. Fusion Eng. Des. 125;2017:577–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.05.028

work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.05.028 2017

[18] [18]

Kresse and J

Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B. 47;1993:558(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.558 1993

[19] [19]

Kresse and J

Kresse G, Hafner J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous- semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B. 49;1994:14251–69. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.14251 1994

[20] [20]

Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set

Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6;1996:15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

work page doi:10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 1996

[21] [21]

Kresse and J

Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 54;1996:11169–86. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 1996

[22] [22]

Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77;1996:3865–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

[23] [23]

Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations

Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 13;1976:5188–92. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 1976

[24] [24]

A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density

Henkelman G, Arnaldsson A, Jónsson H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput. Mater. Sci. 36;2006:354–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010

work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 2006

[25] [25]

A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias

Tang W, Sanville E, Henkelman G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 21;2009:084204. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204

work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 2009

[26] [26]

A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications

Bader RFW. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem. Rev. 91;1991:893–928. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00005a013

work page doi:10.1021/cr00005a013 1991

[27] [27]

Efficient rotation of local basis functions using real spherical harmonics

Maintz S, Esser M, Dronskowski R. Efficient rotation of local basis functions using real spherical harmonics. Acta Phys. Pol. B. 47;2016:1165–75. https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.47.1165

work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.47.1165 2016

[28] [28]

Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets

Deringer VL, Tchougréeff AL, Dronskowski R. Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets. J. Phys. Chem. A. 115;2011:5461–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202489s

work page doi:10.1021/jp202489s 2011

[29] [29]

VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data

Momma K, Izumi F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44;2011:1272–6. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811038970

work page doi:10.1107/s0021889811038970 2011

[30] [30]

Structure and surface energy of low-index surfaces of stoichiometric α-Al2O3 and α-Cr2O3

Sun J, Stirner T, Matthews A. Structure and surface energy of low-index surfaces of stoichiometric α-Al2O3 and α-Cr2O3. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201;2006:4205–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.061

work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.061 2006

[31] [31]

Precise measurement of the lattice parameters of α-Al2O3 in the temperature range 4.5–250 K using the Mössbauer wavelength standard

Lucht M, Lerche M, Wille HC, Shvyd'ko YV , Rüter HD, Gerdau E, Becker P. Precise measurement of the lattice parameters of α-Al2O3 in the temperature range 4.5–250 K using the Mössbauer wavelength standard. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36;2003:1045–50. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889803011051

work page doi:10.1107/s0021889803011051 2003

[32] [32]

The lattice expansion of iron

Basinski ZS, Hume-Rothery W, Sutton AL. The lattice expansion of iron. Proc. R. Soc. A. 228;1955:417–34. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0102

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1955.0102 1955

[33] [33]

Unveiling the origin of diffusion suppression of hydrogen isotopes at the α-Al2O3(0001)/α-Cr2O3(0001) interfaces

Kunisada Y, Sano R, Sakaguchi N. Unveiling the origin of diffusion suppression of hydrogen isotopes at the α-Al2O3(0001)/α-Cr2O3(0001) interfaces. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 97;2025:1327–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.027

work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.027 2025

[34] [34]

First-principles study on the interaction of H interstitials with grain boundaries in α- and γ-Fe

Du YA, Ismer L, Rogal J, Hickel T, Neugebauer J, Drautz R. First-principles study on the interaction of H interstitials with grain boundaries in α- and γ-Fe. Phys. Rev. B. 84;2011:144121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.144121

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.144121 2011

[35] [35]

The Hematite (𝛼-Fe2O3) (0001) Surface: Evidence for Domains of Distinct Chemistry

Wang XG, Weiss W, Shaikhutdinov SK, Ritter M, Petersen M, Wagner F, Schlögl R, Scheffler M. The Hematite (𝛼-Fe2O3) (0001) Surface: Evidence for Domains of Distinct Chemistry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81;1998:1038–41. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1038. Table 1 Average hydrogen formation energy per atom (𝐸f̅ ), estimated formation energy derived from isol...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1038 1998