Interface Symmetry and Electrostatic Stabilization of Strain-Resilient Janus Heterobilayers for Flexible Piezotronics

Caterina Cocchi; Mostafa Torkashvand; Stefan Velja; Surender Kumar

arxiv: 2606.01880 · v1 · pith:TH76VNLQnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Interface Symmetry and Electrostatic Stabilization of Strain-Resilient Janus Heterobilayers for Flexible Piezotronics

Surender Kumar , Mostafa Torkashvand , Stefan Velja , Caterina Cocchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords Janus TMD heterobilayersstrain resilienceinterface electrostaticspiezoelectric coefficientsband gap stabilityMoSSe/WSSeflexible piezotronics

0 comments

The pith

Electrostatic effects at the interface of MoSSe/WSSe Janus heterobilayers suppress the strain-induced band-gap transitions seen in standard TMDs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how stacking order affects the electronic and piezoelectric properties of MoSSe/WSSe heterobilayers under strain using first-principles calculations. It finds that the intrinsic electric fields of the Janus layers plus interface electrostatics keep the band gap from undergoing the indirect-to-direct transitions that occur in conventional TMDs. The in-plane piezoelectric coefficient stays nearly constant regardless of stacking while the shear coefficient varies strongly with interfacial symmetry and responds to strain. These results indicate that interface engineering can produce heterobilayers whose electronic structure remains stable under deformation. The work positions such structures as candidates for flexible optoelectronic and piezotronic devices.

Core claim

By examining different stacking configurations of MoSSe/WSSe heterobilayers, the authors show that interface chemistry modulates interlayer coupling, charge redistribution, and dipole interactions; the combined intrinsic electric fields and interface electrostatics thereby suppress strain-induced band-gap transitions typical of conventional TMDs, while the shear piezoelectric coefficient can be tuned by strain through changes in interfacial symmetry.

What carries the argument

Interface chemistry that modulates interlayer coupling, dynamic charge redistribution, and dipole interactions across different stacking configurations of the Janus heterobilayer.

If this is right

The electronic structure remains stable against lattice deformation, enabling flexible nanoelectronic applications.
In-plane piezoelectric response is insensitive to stacking order.
Shear piezoelectric coefficient depends on interfacial symmetry and can be adjusted by applied strain.
Interface engineering offers a route to strain-resilient Janus heterostructures for optoelectronic, valleytronic, and piezotronic devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same electrostatic stabilization mechanism could apply to other Janus TMD pairs if their intrinsic dipoles produce comparable interface fields.
Targeted growth of specific stacking orders might allow experimental tuning of the shear piezoelectric response beyond what uniform films achieve.
These heterobilayers could widen the usable strain window for 2D piezotronic sensors compared with standard TMD monolayers.

Load-bearing premise

That the limited set of stacking configurations examined captures the dominant interface chemistry and electrostatics that would occur in real fabricated heterobilayers.

What would settle it

Observation of an indirect-to-direct band-gap transition under tensile or compressive strain in a fabricated MoSSe/WSSe heterobilayer would contradict the claimed suppression.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01880 by Caterina Cocchi, Mostafa Torkashvand, Stefan Velja, Surender Kumar.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Strain-dependent structural and electronic properties of MoSSe and WSSe mono [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Strain-dependent structural properties across all considered heterobilayers: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Variation of (a) the net internal dipole moment and (b) the monolayer-resolved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Variation of absolute VBM and CBM w.r.t. vacuum level with biaxial strain for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Strain-dependent layer-projected band structures of (a) SMoSe|SWSe, (b) Se [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Evolution of the in-plane components of the Born effective charges (Z [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Electron and hole effective masses of the considered Janus heterobilayers as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The electronic structure of conventional two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) is highly sensitive to lattice deformation, often leading to indirect-to-direct band-gap transitions that compromise performance in flexible nanoelectronic applications. Janus TMDs, with their broken mirror symmetry and intrinsic out-of-plane dipoles, offer a promising alternative platform for electrostatic tuning. However, their electronic stability under strain and the role of the chalcogen stacking sequence in their heterostructures remains poorly understood. Here, we study from first principles the strain tolerance and piezoelectric properties of MoSSe/WSSe heterobilayers. By examining different configurations, we demonstrate that the interface chemistry strongly modulates interlayer coupling, dynamic charge redistribution, and dipole interactions. Importantly, the combined effects of intrinsic electric fields and interface electrostatics effectively suppress the strain-induced band-gap transitions typical of conventional TMDs. Moreover, while the in-plane piezoelectric response remains nearly insensitive to the stacking order, the shear piezoelectric coefficient depends heavily on the interfacial symmetry and can be effectively tuned by strain modulation. Our results highlight interfacial engineering as a powerful route to design strain-resilient Janus heterostructures for next-generation flexible optoelectronic, valleytronic, and piezotronic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports that interface electrostatics in MoSSe/WSSe Janus heterobilayers suppress strain-induced band-gap shifts and allow tuning of shear piezoelectric response, but the DFT details are too thin to judge how solid the numbers are.

read the letter

The central observation is that in these specific Janus TMD bilayers, the combination of built-in dipoles and stacking-dependent interface fields keeps the band gap from switching character under strain, unlike standard TMDs. They also show the in-plane piezoelectric coefficient stays roughly constant across stackings while the shear one varies and responds to strain.

This is a direct first-principles look at one heterobilayer system using standard methods. The new piece is the concrete link they draw between chalcogen alignment, charge redistribution, and the suppression of the usual strain sensitivity. That is a legitimate incremental step beyond the existing TMD heterostructure literature.

The calculations appear to rest on examining a handful of high-symmetry registries, which is reasonable but leaves open whether those capture the dominant electrostatics in real samples. The abstract supplies no functional, cutoff, k-mesh, or convergence data, no error estimates, and no cross-check against measured strain response in related TMDs. Without those, it is difficult to know how much weight to give the suppression numbers.

The work is a straightforward computational study aimed at people designing flexible 2D piezotronic devices. Readers already working on Janus TMDs or interface engineering will find the stacking trends useful to check against their own calculations. It is not a methods paper or a broad framework, so its value is mainly as a data point for that community.

I would send it to referees. The claim is plausible and the system is well-chosen, but the methods section needs to be expanded and the generality of the stacking results tested before the conclusions can be taken as firm.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents first-principles calculations on MoSSe/WSSe Janus heterobilayers. It claims that interface chemistry in different stacking configurations modulates interlayer coupling, charge redistribution, and dipole interactions such that the combined intrinsic electric fields and interface electrostatics suppress the strain-induced band-gap transitions typical of conventional TMDs; the in-plane piezoelectric response is nearly stacking-insensitive while the shear coefficient depends on interfacial symmetry and can be tuned by strain.

Significance. If the reported suppression is robust, the work would be significant for flexible piezotronics by identifying interfacial electrostatics as a design handle for strain-resilient Janus heterostructures.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that interface electrostatics 'effectively suppress the strain-induced band-gap transitions' rests on 'examining different configurations,' yet no enumeration of high-symmetry registries, convergence with respect to stacking, or comparison to disordered interfaces is described; if other alignments yield weaker suppression, the attribution to interface chemistry is not general.
[Abstract] Abstract/Methods (implied): no DFT functional, plane-wave cutoff, k-point mesh, strain-application protocol, or validation against known TMD strain response is stated, so the numerical support for the suppression cannot be assessed.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'Janus heterobilayers' is used without immediate clarification that the specific MoSSe/WSSe pair is under study.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to enhance clarity and provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that interface electrostatics 'effectively suppress the strain-induced band-gap transitions' rests on 'examining different configurations,' yet no enumeration of high-symmetry registries, convergence with respect to stacking, or comparison to disordered interfaces is described; if other alignments yield weaker suppression, the attribution to interface chemistry is not general.

Authors: We agree the abstract is concise and does not enumerate the registries. The main text examines the principal high-symmetry stacking configurations (AA, AB1, AB2) that preserve the Janus character and lattice commensurability; the suppression of indirect-to-direct transitions is robust across these. To address the concern directly, we will add an explicit table or figure listing the registries, their relative formation energies, and the band-gap evolution under strain for each. Disordered interfaces lie outside the scope of this study of commensurate heterobilayers, but we will add a sentence clarifying this limitation and noting that the electrostatic stabilization mechanism is tied to the periodic interface dipole alignment present in the ordered cases. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract/Methods (implied): no DFT functional, plane-wave cutoff, k-point mesh, strain-application protocol, or validation against known TMD strain response is stated, so the numerical support for the suppression cannot be assessed.

Authors: The Methods section of the manuscript specifies the PBE+D3 functional, 500 eV plane-wave cutoff, 9 imes9 imes1 imes 1 k-mesh, and the strain protocol (uniaxial scaling of the in-plane lattice vectors with full ionic relaxation). Validation against literature monolayer TMD strain responses is also included. However, these details are not summarized in the abstract. We will add a concise methods paragraph immediately after the abstract and ensure the abstract itself references the computational framework, thereby allowing readers to assess the numerical support without ambiguity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports first-principles calculations on MoSSe/WSSe heterobilayers, presenting the suppression of strain-induced band-gap transitions as a computed outcome from examining stacking configurations and interface electrostatics. No equations, parameters, or claims reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. The central result is framed as an independent finding from standard DFT methods rather than a renaming or ansatz smuggled via prior work. This is the normal case of a self-contained computational study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all technical details (DFT functional, k-point sampling, strain range, van der Waals correction) are absent.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5759 in / 1151 out tokens · 19206 ms · 2026-06-28T13:56:24.188136+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references

[1]

A.; Münzenrieder, N.; Barraud, C.; Petti, L.; Zysset, C.; Büthe, L.; Ensslin, K.; Tröster, G

(1) Salvatore, G. A.; Münzenrieder, N.; Barraud, C.; Petti, L.; Zysset, C.; Büthe, L.; Ensslin, K.; Tröster, G. Fabrication and Transfer of Flexible Few-Layers MoS2 Thin Film Transistors to Any Arbitrary Substrate.ACS Nano2013,7, 8809–8815. (2) Akinwande, D.; Petrone, N.; Hone, J. Two-dimensional flexible nanoelectronics.Nat. Commun.2014,5,

2014
[2]

S.; Yeom, G

(4) Singh, E.; Singh, P.; Kim, K. S.; Yeom, G. Y.; Nalwa, H. S. Flexible Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) Atomic Layers for Wearable Electronics and Optoelectronics.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.2019,11, 11061–11105. (5) Lemme, M. C.; Wagner, S.; Lee, K.; Fan, X.; Verbiest, G. J.; Wittmann, S.; Lukas, S.; Dolleman, R. J.; Niklaus, F.; van der Zant, H. S. J.; Due...

2019
[3]

M.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T

(14) Lee, C.-H.; Lee, G.-H.; Van Der Zande, A. M.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T. F.; others Atomically thin p–n junctions with van der Waals heterointerfaces.Nat. Nanotechnol.2014,9, 676–681. (15) Cheng, R.; Li, D.; Zhou, H.; Wang, C.; Yin, A.; Jiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. Electroluminescence a...

2014
[4]

(17) Xia, J.; Yan, J.; Shen, Z. X. Transition metal dichalcogenides: structural, optical and electronic property tuning via thickness and stacking.FlatChem2017,4, 1–19. (18) Wu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Zeng, Z.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, D.; Li, F.; Zhu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, A. Vapor growth of WSe2/WS2 heterostructures with stacking dependent optical properties.Nano...

2019
[5]

V.; Appenzeller, J

(21) Shen, T.; Penumatcha, A. V.; Appenzeller, J. Strain Engineering for Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Based Field Effect Transistors.ACS Nano2016,10, 4712–4718. (22) Castellanos-Gomez, A.; Roldán, R.; Cappelluti, E.; Buscema, M.; Guinea, F.; van der Zant, H. S. J.; Steele, G. A. Local Strain Engineering in Atomically Thin MoS2.Nano Lett.2013,13, 5361–...

arXiv 2013
[6]

Modulation of polarization and metallicity in Janus sliding ferroelectrics.2D Mater.2026,13, 015031

(50) Mahajan, A.; Narayan, A. Modulation of polarization and metallicity in Janus sliding ferroelectrics.2D Mater.2026,13, 015031. (51) Guo, W.; Ge, X.; Sun, S.; Xie, Y.; Ye, X. The strain effect on the electronic properties of the MoSSe/WSSe van der Waals heterostructure: a first-principles study.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2020,22, 4946–4956. (52) Thanh, V. ...

2026
[7]

Flexible nanogenerators for wearable electronic applications based on piezoelectric materials.Mater

(59) Zhao, Z.; Dai, Y.; Dou, S.; Liang, J. Flexible nanogenerators for wearable electronic applications based on piezoelectric materials.Mater. Today Energy2021,20, 100690. (60) Kim, Y.-G.; Song, J.-H.; Hong, S.; Ahn, S.-H. Piezoelectric strain sensor with high sensitivity and high stretchability based on kirigami design cutting.npj Flex. Electron. 2022,6,

2022
[8]

Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Technologies: Synthesis, Mech- anisms, and Multifunctional Applications.ACS Appl

(61) He, Q.; Briscoe, J. Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Technologies: Synthesis, Mech- anisms, and Multifunctional Applications.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2024,16, 29491–29520. (62) Jiang, Y.; Zhang, M.-H.; Wu, C.-F.; Xu, Z.; Li, Z.; Lu, J.-T.; Huang, H.-F.; Zhou, J.- J.; Liu, Y.-X.; Zhou, T.; Gong, W.; Wang, K. Low-field-driven large strain in lead zirco...

2024
[9]

Flexible piezoelectrics: integration of sensing, actuating and energy harvesting.npj Flex

32 (63) Chen, B.; Feng, Z.; Yao, F.-Z.; Zhang, M.-H.; Wang, K.; Wei, Y.; Gong, W.; Rödel, J. Flexible piezoelectrics: integration of sensing, actuating and energy harvesting.npj Flex. Electron.2025,9,

2025
[10]

Rashba spin-orbit coupling effects on piezoelectric properties of two-dimensional Janus materials.Phys

(64) Lin, X.; Rouzhahong, Y.; Liang, C.; Yuan, J.; Yao, S.; Li, H. Rashba spin-orbit coupling effects on piezoelectric properties of two-dimensional Janus materials.Phys. Rev. B 2025,111, 195432. (65) Yumnam, G.; Pandey, T.; Singh, A. K. Interplay of Structural and Bonding Charac- ters in Thermal Conductivity and Born-Effective Charge of Transition Metal ...

2025
[11]

(68) Hasin, K.-E.; Pokhrel, N.; Nowadnick, E. A. Piezoelectricity in n = 2 Ruddlesden– Popper Ferroelectric Oxides.Chem. Mater.2024,36, 7552–7560. (69) Hong, Y.; Deng, J.; Kong, Q.; Yin, Y.; Ding, X.; Sun, J.; Liu, J. Z. Origin of different piezoelectric responses in elemental Sb and Bi monolayers.Phys. Rev. B2024,109, 035204. (70) Pike, N. A.; Van Troeye...

2024
[12]

Systematic treatment of displacements, strains, and electric fields in density-functional perturbation theory.Phys

35 (91) Wu, X.; Vanderbilt, D.; Hamann, D. Systematic treatment of displacements, strains, and electric fields in density-functional perturbation theory.Phys. Rev. B2005,72, 035105. (92) Wang, V.; Xu, N.; Liu, J.-C.; Tang, G.; Geng, W.-T. VASPKIT: A user-friendly inter- face facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code.Comput. Phys....

2021

[1] [1]

A.; Münzenrieder, N.; Barraud, C.; Petti, L.; Zysset, C.; Büthe, L.; Ensslin, K.; Tröster, G

(1) Salvatore, G. A.; Münzenrieder, N.; Barraud, C.; Petti, L.; Zysset, C.; Büthe, L.; Ensslin, K.; Tröster, G. Fabrication and Transfer of Flexible Few-Layers MoS2 Thin Film Transistors to Any Arbitrary Substrate.ACS Nano2013,7, 8809–8815. (2) Akinwande, D.; Petrone, N.; Hone, J. Two-dimensional flexible nanoelectronics.Nat. Commun.2014,5,

2014

[2] [2]

S.; Yeom, G

(4) Singh, E.; Singh, P.; Kim, K. S.; Yeom, G. Y.; Nalwa, H. S. Flexible Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) Atomic Layers for Wearable Electronics and Optoelectronics.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.2019,11, 11061–11105. (5) Lemme, M. C.; Wagner, S.; Lee, K.; Fan, X.; Verbiest, G. J.; Wittmann, S.; Lukas, S.; Dolleman, R. J.; Niklaus, F.; van der Zant, H. S. J.; Due...

2019

[3] [3]

M.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T

(14) Lee, C.-H.; Lee, G.-H.; Van Der Zande, A. M.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T. F.; others Atomically thin p–n junctions with van der Waals heterointerfaces.Nat. Nanotechnol.2014,9, 676–681. (15) Cheng, R.; Li, D.; Zhou, H.; Wang, C.; Yin, A.; Jiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. Electroluminescence a...

2014

[4] [4]

(17) Xia, J.; Yan, J.; Shen, Z. X. Transition metal dichalcogenides: structural, optical and electronic property tuning via thickness and stacking.FlatChem2017,4, 1–19. (18) Wu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Zeng, Z.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, D.; Li, F.; Zhu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, A. Vapor growth of WSe2/WS2 heterostructures with stacking dependent optical properties.Nano...

2019

[5] [5]

V.; Appenzeller, J

(21) Shen, T.; Penumatcha, A. V.; Appenzeller, J. Strain Engineering for Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Based Field Effect Transistors.ACS Nano2016,10, 4712–4718. (22) Castellanos-Gomez, A.; Roldán, R.; Cappelluti, E.; Buscema, M.; Guinea, F.; van der Zant, H. S. J.; Steele, G. A. Local Strain Engineering in Atomically Thin MoS2.Nano Lett.2013,13, 5361–...

arXiv 2013

[6] [6]

Modulation of polarization and metallicity in Janus sliding ferroelectrics.2D Mater.2026,13, 015031

(50) Mahajan, A.; Narayan, A. Modulation of polarization and metallicity in Janus sliding ferroelectrics.2D Mater.2026,13, 015031. (51) Guo, W.; Ge, X.; Sun, S.; Xie, Y.; Ye, X. The strain effect on the electronic properties of the MoSSe/WSSe van der Waals heterostructure: a first-principles study.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2020,22, 4946–4956. (52) Thanh, V. ...

2026

[7] [7]

Flexible nanogenerators for wearable electronic applications based on piezoelectric materials.Mater

(59) Zhao, Z.; Dai, Y.; Dou, S.; Liang, J. Flexible nanogenerators for wearable electronic applications based on piezoelectric materials.Mater. Today Energy2021,20, 100690. (60) Kim, Y.-G.; Song, J.-H.; Hong, S.; Ahn, S.-H. Piezoelectric strain sensor with high sensitivity and high stretchability based on kirigami design cutting.npj Flex. Electron. 2022,6,

2022

[8] [8]

Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Technologies: Synthesis, Mech- anisms, and Multifunctional Applications.ACS Appl

(61) He, Q.; Briscoe, J. Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Technologies: Synthesis, Mech- anisms, and Multifunctional Applications.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2024,16, 29491–29520. (62) Jiang, Y.; Zhang, M.-H.; Wu, C.-F.; Xu, Z.; Li, Z.; Lu, J.-T.; Huang, H.-F.; Zhou, J.- J.; Liu, Y.-X.; Zhou, T.; Gong, W.; Wang, K. Low-field-driven large strain in lead zirco...

2024

[9] [9]

Flexible piezoelectrics: integration of sensing, actuating and energy harvesting.npj Flex

32 (63) Chen, B.; Feng, Z.; Yao, F.-Z.; Zhang, M.-H.; Wang, K.; Wei, Y.; Gong, W.; Rödel, J. Flexible piezoelectrics: integration of sensing, actuating and energy harvesting.npj Flex. Electron.2025,9,

2025

[10] [10]

Rashba spin-orbit coupling effects on piezoelectric properties of two-dimensional Janus materials.Phys

(64) Lin, X.; Rouzhahong, Y.; Liang, C.; Yuan, J.; Yao, S.; Li, H. Rashba spin-orbit coupling effects on piezoelectric properties of two-dimensional Janus materials.Phys. Rev. B 2025,111, 195432. (65) Yumnam, G.; Pandey, T.; Singh, A. K. Interplay of Structural and Bonding Charac- ters in Thermal Conductivity and Born-Effective Charge of Transition Metal ...

2025

[11] [11]

(68) Hasin, K.-E.; Pokhrel, N.; Nowadnick, E. A. Piezoelectricity in n = 2 Ruddlesden– Popper Ferroelectric Oxides.Chem. Mater.2024,36, 7552–7560. (69) Hong, Y.; Deng, J.; Kong, Q.; Yin, Y.; Ding, X.; Sun, J.; Liu, J. Z. Origin of different piezoelectric responses in elemental Sb and Bi monolayers.Phys. Rev. B2024,109, 035204. (70) Pike, N. A.; Van Troeye...

2024

[12] [12]

Systematic treatment of displacements, strains, and electric fields in density-functional perturbation theory.Phys

35 (91) Wu, X.; Vanderbilt, D.; Hamann, D. Systematic treatment of displacements, strains, and electric fields in density-functional perturbation theory.Phys. Rev. B2005,72, 035105. (92) Wang, V.; Xu, N.; Liu, J.-C.; Tang, G.; Geng, W.-T. VASPKIT: A user-friendly inter- face facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code.Comput. Phys....

2021