pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02447 · v2 · pith:66S2T552new · submitted 2026-06-01 · ✦ hep-lat

Kinematic enhancement for nucleon interpolators

Daniel Reitinger , Tobias Sizmann , Andreas Sch\"afer , Rui Zhang , Yong Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 11:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat
keywords lattice QCDnucleon matrix elementskinematic enhancementparton distributionsexcited statesboosted hadrons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Kinematically enhanced interpolators improve nucleon matrix element precision by an order of magnitude at high momenta.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper benchmarks kinematically enhanced interpolators for unpolarized isovector nucleon quark matrix elements extracted at large source-sink separations in lattice QCD. These operators yield an order of magnitude better precision in the renormalized matrix elements around P_z of 2.5 GeV. Results from three CLS ensembles with different spacings but matched pion mass show no statistically significant lattice spacing dependence. The findings indicate the operators are advantageous for parton physics calculations and can extend to other baryon observables.

Core claim

The precision of the renormalized nucleon matrix elements is typically improved by an order of magnitude at momentum P_z ∼ 2.5 GeV. By comparing results from three CLS ensembles with different lattice spacings a but the same pion mass, no statistically significant dependence on a is observed in the renormalized matrix elements at nearly identical values of P_z.

What carries the argument

Kinematically enhanced interpolators for boosted nucleons, which improve signal quality and suppress excited-state contributions at large momenta when combined with large source-sink separations.

If this is right

  • The operators enable higher-precision calculations of nucleon parton distributions on the lattice.
  • The approach extends naturally to a broader class of baryon observables.
  • These interpolators become a standard component in modern lattice QCD parton physics studies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar kinematic enhancements could be tested on other boosted hadron matrix elements to check for comparable precision gains.
  • Adoption may lower the computational cost of reaching target precision in high-momentum nucleon calculations.
  • The lack of lattice spacing dependence supports use across a wider range of ensemble parameters for EIC-related observables.

Load-bearing premise

Excited state artifacts are significantly suppressed at the large source-sink separations used, enabling clean extraction of ground state matrix elements.

What would settle it

Repeating the matrix element extraction at the same P_z but with smaller source-sink separations where excited states remain unsuppressed, and finding no order-of-magnitude precision gain.

read the original abstract

The reliable treatment of highly boosted hadrons is crucial for many lattice QCD applications. For all these cases the kinematically enhanced interpolators promise very significant improvements and are, therefore, ever more often used in recent calculations, especially for highly boosted mesons like the pion. Motivated by, e.g., the physics program of the future Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) in the US and Electron-Ion collider in China (EIcC), we systematically benchmark our code for the unpolarized isovector nucleon quark matrix elements extracted at large source-sink separations, where excited state artifacts are significantly suppressed. We find that the precision of the renormalized nucleon matrix elements is typically improved by an order of magnitude at momentum $P_z\sim2.5$ GeV. By comparing the results from three CLS ensembles with different lattice spacings $a$ but the same pion mass, we observe no statistically significant dependence on $a$ in the renormalized matrix elements at nearly identical values of $P_z$. These encouraging results suggest that the use of kinematically improved operators is highly advantageous for parton physics calculations and can be extended to a broader class of baryon observables, making them a promising candidate for a standard component of modern lattice QCD.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript benchmarks kinematically enhanced interpolators for extracting unpolarized isovector nucleon quark matrix elements in lattice QCD. It reports that these operators yield an order-of-magnitude improvement in the precision of renormalized matrix elements at P_z ∼ 2.5 GeV, with no statistically significant lattice-spacing dependence observed when comparing three CLS ensembles at fixed pion mass but different a, all at large source-sink separations where excited-state effects are asserted to be suppressed.

Significance. If the central claims hold after verification of the excited-state assumption, the work would provide a practical and broadly applicable improvement for lattice calculations of nucleon structure functions and parton distributions, directly relevant to the EIC and EIcC physics programs; the a-independence result would further strengthen in continuum extrapolations for boosted baryons.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim of 'typically improved by an order of magnitude' is presented without any quantitative data, error analysis, or explicit comparison (e.g., variance ratios or signal-to-noise figures) between standard and kinematically enhanced interpolators, so the magnitude of the reported gain cannot be assessed from the available text.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (and results discussion): the attribution of precision gains specifically to the kinematic enhancement rests on the assumption that excited-state contamination is comparably suppressed for both operator sets at the large source-sink separations employed; no quantitative evidence (plateau quality, effective-mass comparisons, multi-state fit stability, or overlap-factor ratios) is supplied to rule out the possibility that the enhanced operators simply reduce excited-state overlap more effectively.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim of 'typically improved by an order of magnitude' is presented without any quantitative data, error analysis, or explicit comparison (e.g., variance ratios or signal-to-noise figures) between standard and kinematically enhanced interpolators, so the magnitude of the reported gain cannot be assessed from the available text.

    Authors: The abstract condenses the central result from the quantitative analysis presented in the body of the manuscript, where variance ratios and signal-to-noise comparisons between the two interpolator sets are shown in figures and tables at P_z ~ 2.5 GeV. To address the concern that the abstract itself lacks these details, we will revise the abstract to include a brief quantitative statement of the typical improvement factor together with a reference to the relevant figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and results discussion): the attribution of precision gains specifically to the kinematic enhancement rests on the assumption that excited-state contamination is comparably suppressed for both operator sets at the large source-sink separations employed; no quantitative evidence (plateau quality, effective-mass comparisons, multi-state fit stability, or overlap-factor ratios) is supplied to rule out the possibility that the enhanced operators simply reduce excited-state overlap more effectively.

    Authors: The manuscript selects source-sink separations large enough that excited-state effects are stated to be significantly suppressed for the matrix elements under study. However, we did not supply explicit side-by-side comparisons of plateau quality, effective-mass plots, or overlap factors between the standard and kinematically enhanced interpolators. This is a valid observation. In the revised manuscript we will add such quantitative evidence from the existing data sets to demonstrate that the suppression is comparable for both operator families. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; numerical benchmark results are direct simulation outputs

full rationale

The paper reports empirical lattice QCD results from simulations on CLS ensembles comparing standard vs. kinematically enhanced nucleon interpolators at large source-sink separations. Claims of order-of-magnitude precision improvement and a-independence are presented as direct numerical findings, not as derivations, predictions from fitted parameters, or results forced by self-citation chains. No equations, ansatze, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that reduce to the inputs by construction. The excited-state suppression assumption is asserted but does not create a self-referential loop in any derivation chain. This is a standard self-contained numerical study with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no information on any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5757 in / 1228 out tokens · 29655 ms · 2026-06-28T11:36:12.307029+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 28 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Zhang, A.V

    R. Zhang, A.V. Grebe, D.C. Hackett, M.L. Wagman and Y. Zhao, Kinematically enhanced interpolating operators for boosted hadrons,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) L051502 [2501.00729]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Liu and S.-J

    K.-F. Liu and S.-J. Dong, Origin of difference between anti-d and anti-u partons in the nucleon,Phys. Rev. Lett.72 (1994) 1790 [hep-ph/9306299]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  3. [3]

    Detmold and C.J.D

    W. Detmold and C.J.D. Lin, Deep-inelastic scattering and the operator product expansion in lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D 73(2006) 014501 [hep-lat/0507007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Braun and D

    V. Braun and D. Müller, Exclusive processes in position space and the pion distribution amplitude,Eur. Phys. J. C 55(2008) 349 [0709.1348]. – 21 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    Davoudi and M.J

    Z. Davoudi and M.J. Savage, Restoration of Rotational Symmetry in the Continuum Limit of Lattice Field Theories, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 054505 [1204.4146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Ji,Parton Physics on a Euclidean Lattice,Phys

    X. Ji,Parton Physics on a Euclidean Lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 262002 [1305.1539]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Radyushkin, Quasi-parton distribution functions, momentum distributions, and pseudo-parton distribution functions, Phys

    A.V. Radyushkin, Quasi-parton distribution functions, momentum distributions, and pseudo-parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 034025 [1705.01488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Ma and J.-W

    Y.-Q. Ma and J.-W. Qiu, Exploring Partonic Structure of Hadrons Using ab initio Lattice QCD Calculations,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 022003 [1709.03018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Chambers, R

    A.J. Chambers, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, H. Perlt, P.E.L. Rakow, G. Schierholz et al., Nucleon Structure Functions from Operator Product Expansion on the Lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 242001 [1703.01153]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Shindler,Moments of parton distribution functions of any order from lattice QCD,Phys

    A. Shindler,Moments of parton distribution functions of any order from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) L051503 [2311.18704]

    arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Anderle et al.,Electron-ion collider in China,Front.Phys

    D.P. Anderle et al.,Electron-ion collider in China,Front.Phys. (Beijing)16(2021) 64701 [2102.09222]

    arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Burkert et al.,Precision studies of QCD in the low energy domain of the EIC,Prog

    V.D. Burkert et al.,Precision studies of QCD in the low energy domain of the EIC,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.131(2023) 104032 [2211.15746]

    arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Amoroso et al.,Snowmass 2021 Whitepaper: Proton Structure at the Precision Frontier, Acta Phys

    S. Amoroso et al.,Snowmass 2021 Whitepaper: Proton Structure at the Precision Frontier, Acta Phys. Polon. B53(2022) 12 [2203.13923]

    arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Boussarie et al.,TMD Handbook,2304.03302

    R. Boussarie et al.,TMD Handbook,2304.03302

    arXiv

  15. [15]

    Accardi et al., Strong interaction physics at the luminosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur

    A. Accardi et al., Strong interaction physics at the luminosity frontier with 22 GeV electrons at Jefferson Lab, Eur. Phys. J. A60(2024) 173 [2306.09360]

    arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Abir et al.,The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC, 2305.14572

    R. Abir et al.,The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC, 2305.14572

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Constantinou, The x-dependence of hadronic parton distributions: A review on the progress of lattice QCD, Eur

    M. Constantinou, The x-dependence of hadronic parton distributions: A review on the progress of lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. A57(2021) 77 [2010.02445]

    arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Ji, Y.-S

    X. Ji, Y.-S. Liu, Y. Liu, J.-H. Zhang and Y. Zhao,Large-momentum effective theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035005 [2004.03543]

    arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Ji,Parton Physics from Large-Momentum Effective Field Theory,Sci

    X. Ji,Parton Physics from Large-Momentum Effective Field Theory,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.57(2014) 1407 [1404.6680]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Zhang, X

    J. Zhang, X. Ji, A. Schäfer, R. Zhang and C. Zimmermann, Parton Distribution Functions from Large Momentum Expansion of Current-Current Correlators, 2605.03234

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    H.-T. Ding, X. Gao, A.D. Hanlon, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, Q. Shi et al., QCD Predictions for Meson Electromagnetic Form Factors at High Momenta: Testing Factorization in Exclusive Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 181902 [2404.04412]. – 22 – [22]LHCbcollaboration, Observation of CP Violation in Charm Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 211803 [1903.08...

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Cichy and M

    K. Cichy and M. Constantinou, A guide to light-cone PDFs from Lattice QCD: an overview of approaches, techniques and results, Adv. High Energy Phys.2019(2019) 3036904 [1811.07248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Zhao,Unraveling high-energy hadron structures with lattice QCD,Int

    Y. Zhao,Unraveling high-energy hadron structures with lattice QCD,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33(2019) 1830033 [1812.07192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Lin et al., Parton distributions and lattice QCD calculations: a community white paper,Prog

    H.-W. Lin et al., Parton distributions and lattice QCD calculations: a community white paper,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.100(2018) 107 [1711.07916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Constantinou et al., Parton distributions and lattice-QCD calculations: Toward 3D structure,Prog

    M. Constantinou et al., Parton distributions and lattice-QCD calculations: Toward 3D structure,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.121(2021) 103908 [2006.08636]

    arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Cichy,Progress inx-dependent partonic distributions from lattice QCD,PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 017 [2110.07440]

    K. Cichy,Progress inx-dependent partonic distributions from lattice QCD,PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 017 [2110.07440]

    arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Zhao, Improving the Precision of First-Principles Calculation of Parton Physics from Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics, Research9(2026) 1181 [2509.00247]

    Y. Zhao, Improving the Precision of First-Principles Calculation of Parton Physics from Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics, Research9(2026) 1181 [2509.00247]

    arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Lin,Mapping parton distributions of hadrons with lattice QCD,Prog

    H.-W. Lin,Mapping parton distributions of hadrons with lattice QCD,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.144(2025) 104177 [2506.05025]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Alexandrou et al.,Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider,2604.04765

    C. Alexandrou et al.,Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider,2604.04765

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Ji,Euclidean effective theory for partons in the spirit of Steven Weinberg,Nucl

    X. Ji,Euclidean effective theory for partons in the spirit of Steven Weinberg,Nucl. Phys. B 1007(2024) 116670 [2408.03378]

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Ji,Why is LaMET an effective field theory for partonic structure?,AAPPS Bull.30 (2020) 58 [2007.06613]

    X. Ji,Why is LaMET an effective field theory for partonic structure?,AAPPS Bull.30 (2020) 58 [2007.06613]

    arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Ji, Large-Momentum Effective Theory vs

    X. Ji, Large-Momentum Effective Theory vs. Short-Distance Operator Expansion: Contrast and Complementarity, Research8(2025) 0695 [2209.09332]

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Dutrieux, J

    H. Dutrieux, J. Karpie, C.J. Monahan, K. Orginos, A. Radyushkin, D. Richards et al., Inverse problem in the LaMET framework,2504.17706

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Xiong, J

    A.-S. Xiong, J. Hua, T. Wei, F.-S. Yu, Q.-A. Zhang and Y. Zheng, Ill-Posedness in Limited Discrete Fourier Inversion and Regularization for Quasi Distributions in LaMET, 2506.16689

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    Chen et al.,LaMET’s Asymptotic Extrapolation vs

    J.-W. Chen et al.,LaMET’s Asymptotic Extrapolation vs. Inverse Problem,2505.14619

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Ling, M.-H

    Y.-F. Ling, M.-H. Chu, J. Liang, J. Hua, A.-S. Xiong and Q.-A. Zhang, Approaches to the inverse Fourier transformation with limited and discrete data,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 379 [2511.03593]

    arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Medrano, H

    Y.C. Medrano, H. Dutrieux, J. Karpie, K. Orginos and S. Zafeiropoulos, Gaussian Processes for Inferring Parton Distributions,2510.21041. – 23 –

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    X. Ji, Y. Liu and Y. Su, Asymptotic Long-Distance Expansion of Euclidean Correlators in Lattice Parton Applications, 2601.12189

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    Bollweg, X

    D. Bollweg, X. Gao, J. He, S. Mukherjee and Y. Zhao, Transverse-momentum-dependent pion structures from lattice QCD: Collins-Soper kernel, soft factor, TMDWF, and TMDPDF, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 034501 [2504.04625]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Bai and others (Lattice Parton Collaboration (LPC)), Hybrid renormalization for distribution amplitude of a light baryon in large momentum effective theory, Phys

    H. Bai and others (Lattice Parton Collaboration (LPC)), Hybrid renormalization for distribution amplitude of a light baryon in large momentum effective theory, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 114515 [2508.08971]. [43]HOPEcollaboration, Parton physics from a heavy-quark operator product expansion: Lattice QCD calculation of the fourth moment of the pion distribution...

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    C. Chen, H. Dong, L. Liu, P. Sun, X. Xiong, Y.-B. Yang et al., Unpolarized gluon PDF of the nucleon from lattice QCD in the continuum limit, 2510.26425

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Tan et al., Lattice QCD determination of the Collins-Soper kernel in the continuum and physical mass limits, Phys

    J.-X. Tan et al., Lattice QCD determination of the Collins-Soper kernel in the continuum and physical mass limits, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 054505 [2511.22547]. [46]CLQCDcollaboration, Total Gluon Helicity Contribution to the Proton Spin from Lattice QCD,2512.24315. [47]LPCcollaboration, Determination of heavy meson light-cone distribution amplitudes: theore...

    arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    X. Ji, Y. Liu, A. Schäfer, W. Wang, Y.-B. Yang, J.-H. Zhang et al., A Hybrid Renormalization Scheme for Quasi Light-Front Correlations in Large-Momentum Effective Theory, Nucl. Phys. B964(2021) 115311 [2008.03886]

    arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Burkardt, X.-d

    M. Burkardt, X.-d. Ji and F. Yuan, Scale dependence of hadronic wave functions and parton densities,Phys. Lett. B545(2002) 345 [hep-ph/0205272]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Ji, J.-P

    X.-d. Ji, J.-P. Ma and F. Yuan, Classification and asymptotic scaling of hadrons’ light cone wave function amplitudes,Eur. Phys. J. C33(2004) 75 [hep-ph/0304107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  46. [46]

    Parisi,The Strategy for Computing the Hadronic Mass Spectrum,Phys

    G. Parisi,The Strategy for Computing the Hadronic Mass Spectrum,Phys. Rept.103 (1984) 203

    1984

  47. [47]

    Lepage,The Analysis of Algorithms for Lattice Field Theory, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, 6, 1989

    G.P. Lepage,The Analysis of Algorithms for Lattice Field Theory, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, 6, 1989

    1989

  48. [48]

    Lee and D.B

    F.X. Lee and D.B. Leinweber,Negative parity baryon spectroscopy,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.73(1999) 258 [hep-lat/9809095]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  49. [49]

    Stokes, W

    F.M. Stokes, W. Kamleh, D.B. Leinweber and B.J. Owen, Electromagnetic Form Factors of Excited Nucleons via Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis, PoSLA TTICE2016(2016) 161 [1701.07177]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Martinelli and C.T

    G. Martinelli and C.T. Sachrajda,A lattice study of nucleon structure, Nucl. Phys. B316 (1989) 355. – 24 –

    1989

  51. [51]

    Xiong, X

    X. Xiong, X. Ji, J.-H. Zhang and Y. Zhao, One-loop matching for parton distributions: Nonsinglet case,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 014051 [1310.7471]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    Izubuchi, X

    T. Izubuchi, X. Ji, L. Jin, I.W. Stewart and Y. Zhao, Factorization Theorem Relating Euclidean and Light-Cone Parton Distributions,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 056004 [1801.03917]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Dotsenko and S.N

    V.S. Dotsenko and S.N. Vergeles, Renormalizability of Phase Factors in the Nonabelian Gauge Theory,Nucl. Phys. B169 (1980) 527

    1980

  54. [54]

    Craigie and H

    N.S. Craigie and H. Dorn, On the Renormalization and Short Distance Properties of Hadronic Operators in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B185(1981) 204

    1981

  55. [55]

    Dorn, Renormalization of Path Ordered Phase Factors and Related Hadron Operators in Gauge Field Theories, Fortsch.Phys.34(1986) 11

    H. Dorn, Renormalization of Path Ordered Phase Factors and Related Hadron Operators in Gauge Field Theories, Fortsch.Phys.34(1986) 11

    1986

  56. [56]

    Ji, J.-H

    X. Ji, J.-H. Zhang and Y. Zhao, Renormalization in Large Momentum Effective Theory of Parton Physics,Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(2018) 112001 [1706.08962]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Ishikawa, Y.-Q

    T. Ishikawa, Y.-Q. Ma, J.-W. Qiu and S. Yoshida, Renormalizability of quasiparton distribution functions,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 094019 [1707.03107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Green, K

    J. Green, K. Jansen and F. Steffens, Nonperturbative Renormalization of Nonlocal Quark Bilinears for Parton Quasidistribution Functions on the Lattice Using an Auxiliary Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 022004 [1707.07152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Orginos, A

    K. Orginos, A. Radyushkin, J. Karpie and S. Zafeiropoulos,Lattice qcd exploration of parton pseudo-distribution functions, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 094503 [1706.05373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Radyushkin,One-loop evolution of parton pseudo-distribution functions on the lattice, Phys

    A.V. Radyushkin,One-loop evolution of parton pseudo-distribution functions on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 014019 [1801.02427]. [66]Lattice Parton (LPC)collaboration, Self-renormalization of quasi-light-front correlators on the lattice,Nucl. Phys. B969(2021) 115443 [2103.02965]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Zhang, J

    R. Zhang, J. Holligan, X. Ji and Y. Su, Leading power accuracy in lattice calculations of parton distributions,Phys. Lett. B844 (2023) 138081 [2305.05212]

    arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Holligan, X

    J. Holligan, X. Ji, H.-W. Lin, Y. Su and R. Zhang, Precision control in lattice calculation of x-dependent pion distribution amplitude,Nucl. Phys. B993(2023) 116282 [2301.10372]

    arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Bruno et al., Simulation of QCD with Nf =2+1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions, JHEP02(2015) 043 [1411.3982]

    M. Bruno et al., Simulation of QCD with Nf =2+1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions, JHEP02(2015) 043 [1411.3982]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    G.S. Bali, S. Collins, P. Georg, D. Jenkins, P. Korcyl, A. Schäfer et al., Scale setting and the light baryon spectrum in Nf = 2 + 1 QCD with Wilson fermions, JHEP05(2023) 035 [2211.03744]. – 25 –

    arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Albanese, F

    M. Albanese, F. Costantini, G. Fiorentini, F. Flore, M. Lombardo, R. Tripiccione et al., Glueball masses and string tension in lattice qcd, Physics Letters B192(1987) 163

    1987

  66. [66]

    G.S. Bali, B. Lang, B.U. Musch and A. Schäfer, Novel quark smearing for hadrons with high momenta in lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 094515 [1602.05525]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  67. [67]

    Clark, R

    M. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. Brower and C. Rebbi,Solving lattice qcd systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on gpus, Computer Physics Communications181 (2010) 1517–1528

    2010

  68. [68]

    Babich, M.A

    R. Babich, M.A. Clark, B. Joó, G. Shi, R.C. Brower and S. Gottlieb,Scaling lattice qcd beyond 100 gpus, inProceedings of 2011 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC ’11, p. 1–11, ACM, Nov., 2011, DOI

    2011

  69. [69]

    Jiang, C

    X. Jiang, C. Shi, Y. Chen, M. Gong and Y.-B. Yang,Use quda for lattice qcd calculation with python, 2024

    2024

  70. [70]

    Yao and others (Lattice Parton collaboration), Nucleon Transversity Distribution in the Continuum and Physical Mass Limit from Lattice QCD, Phys

    F. Yao and others (Lattice Parton collaboration), Nucleon Transversity Distribution in the Continuum and Physical Mass Limit from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 261901 [2208.08008]

    arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Holligan and H.-W

    J. Holligan and H.-W. Lin,Systematic improvement of x-dependent unpolarized nucleon generalized parton distributions in lattice-QCD calculation, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 034503 [2312.10829]

    arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    NieMiera, W

    A. NieMiera, W. Good, H.-W. Lin and F. Yao,First self-renormalized gluon pdf of nucleon from large-momentum effective theory in the continuum limit, arXiv preprint (2025) [2510.17758]

    arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Holligan and H.-W

    J. Holligan and H.-W. Lin,Nucleon helicity parton distribution function in the continuum limit with self-renormalization, Physics Letters B854(2024) 138731

    2024

  74. [74]

    C. Chen, Y. Geng, L. Liu, P. Sun, Y.-B. Yang, F. Yao et al., Parton distribution function of a deuteronlike dibaryon system from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 074506 [2408.12819]

    arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Han and others (Lattice Parton Collaboration (LPC)), Calculation of heavy meson light-cone distribution amplitudes from lattice QCD,Phys

    X.-Y. Han and others (Lattice Parton Collaboration (LPC)), Calculation of heavy meson light-cone distribution amplitudes from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 034503 [2410.18654]

    arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Gao, W.-Y

    X. Gao, W.-Y. Liu and Y. Zhao, Parton distributions from boosted fields in the Coulomb gauge,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094506 [2306.14960]

    arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Zhao,Transverse Momentum Distributions from Lattice QCD without Wilson Lines, Phys

    Y. Zhao,Transverse Momentum Distributions from Lattice QCD without Wilson Lines, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 241904 [2311.01391]

    arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    X. Gao, J. He, J. Lin, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, R. Zhang et al., Nucleon Parton Distribution Functions from Boosted Correlations in the Coulomb gauge, 2602.11283. – 26 –

    arXiv