pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04765 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider

C. Alexandrou , M. Arratia , E.C. Aschenauer , A. Avkhadiev , P.V. Balachandran , V. Bertone , I. Borsa , M. Cerutti
show 61 more authors
X. Chu W. Cosyn D. de Florian A. Dumitru M. Engelhardt R. Fatemi S. Forte Y. Fu L. Gamberg H. Gao T. Gehrmann A. Gehrmann-De Ridder Y. Go Y. Guo Y. Hatta J. Haug T.J. Hobbs T. Horn E. Iancu J. Jalilian-Marian Z.B. Kang M. Klasen Y.V. Kovchegov B. Kriesten J.G. Lajoie W. Li X. Li Y. Li H.-W. Lin M.X. Liu S. Liuti C. Marquet P. Meinzinger W. Melnitchouk S. Moch P. Nadel-Turonski P. Nadolsky M. Neubert A. NieMiera E.R. Nocera C. Pecar J. Penttala C. Pisano A. Prokudin J.-W. Qiu F. Ringer F. Salazar R. Sassot J. Schoenleber R. Seidl V. Skokov A.M. Sta\'sto R. Sufian S. Tiwari M. Ubiali R. Venugopalan W. Vogelsang F. Wunder F. Yuan Y. Zhao W. Zhao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords Electron-Ion ColliderPrecision QCDParton distribution functionsGluon saturationNuclear structurePerturbative QCDArtificial intelligence
0
0 comments X

The pith

A five-week program identifies five key priorities for precision QCD at the Electron-Ion Collider.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This document summarizes discussions from a program that assembled theorists, experimentalists, and computer scientists to prepare the physics case for the future Electron-Ion Collider. The effort centers on aligning higher-order perturbative calculations, nuclear imaging techniques, parton distribution functions from lattice and phenomenology, observables for dense gluon matter, and artificial intelligence tools for analysis and instrumentation. Readers would care because the EIC will deliver high-precision data on quantum chromodynamics inside nuclei, and coordinated planning is needed to extract maximum insight from those measurements. The summary records the community consensus on where focused work is most likely to advance understanding before the collider begins operation.

Core claim

The program identified five principal areas for advancing precision QCD at the EIC: higher-order perturbative-QCD calculations and techniques; nuclear structure and tomography; comparisons of phenomenological and lattice determinations of parton distribution functions; identification of signature observables for saturated gluons; and assessment of the importance of AI techniques for EIC studies and detector development.

What carries the argument

The five-week collaborative program that collects and synthesizes input from roughly seventy experts to prioritize research directions for the Electron-Ion Collider.

If this is right

  • Higher-order perturbative calculations will be required to match the expected precision of EIC measurements.
  • Direct comparisons between lattice and phenomenological parton distributions will reduce systematic uncertainties in nuclear structure studies.
  • Dedicated observables will be needed to isolate gluon saturation effects in high-density nuclear environments.
  • AI methods will be integrated into both theoretical modeling and real-time detector calibration for the EIC.
  • Tomographic reconstruction techniques will map the three-dimensional partonic structure of nucleons inside nuclei.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These priorities are likely to influence which theory calculations and experimental analyses receive the earliest funding and computing resources.
  • Closer coupling between lattice QCD and EIC phenomenology may resolve existing discrepancies in parton distribution functions.
  • The explicit inclusion of AI assessment signals an expectation that machine-learning tools will become standard in nuclear-physics data interpretation.
  • Community-wide workshops of this type could serve as a model for planning other large-scale facilities.

Load-bearing premise

That the topics selected during the program discussions are in fact the most important open questions whose resolution will determine the scientific reach of the Electron-Ion Collider.

What would settle it

If the first years of EIC data reveal that one of the five listed topics, such as signatures of gluon saturation, produces no distinctive signals within the collider's kinematic reach, the prioritization recorded in the summary would be called into question.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04765 by A. Avkhadiev, A. Dumitru, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, A.M. Sta\'sto, A. NieMiera, A. Prokudin, B. Kriesten, C. Alexandrou, C. Marquet, C. Pecar, C. Pisano, D. de Florian, E.C. Aschenauer, E. Iancu, E.R. Nocera, F. Ringer, F. Salazar, F. Wunder, F. Yuan, H. Gao, H.-W. Lin, I. Borsa, J.G. Lajoie, J. Haug, J. Jalilian-Marian, J. Penttala, J. Schoenleber, J.-W. Qiu, L. Gamberg, M. Arratia, M. Cerutti, M. Engelhardt, M. Klasen, M. Neubert, M. Ubiali, M.X. Liu, P. Meinzinger, P. Nadel-Turonski, P. Nadolsky, P.V. Balachandran, R. Fatemi, R. Sassot, R. Seidl, R. Sufian, R. Venugopalan, S. Forte, S. Liuti, S. Moch, S. Tiwari, T. Gehrmann, T. Horn, T.J. Hobbs, V. Bertone, V. Skokov, W. Cosyn, W. Li, W. Melnitchouk, W. Vogelsang, W. Zhao, X. Chu, X. Li, Y. Fu, Y. Go, Y. Guo, Y. Hatta, Y. Li, Y.V. Kovchegov, Y. Zhao, Z.B. Kang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Approximate NLO,NNLO K-factors for SIDIS of [30] for typical COMPASS kinematics. Right: Full NNLO results of Ref. [20]. is again useful here. We foresee many interesting and phenomenologically relevant applications for the EIC here, among them in particular the inclusion of threshold resummation in predictions for high-pT cross sections [110,111] and in TMD observables. 1.3. The strong coupling const… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The global determination of the value of the strong coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Summary of the determinations of αs: taken from Ref. [114]. uncertainty on the lattice determination: it is somewhat troubling that the uncertainty increases as a function of time. A significant issue in performing a combination can be understood by inspecting the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A typical likelihood profile in αs-PDF space. The multidimensional PDF space is schematically represented as a single parameter ˆθ; σα and σθ are the one￾sigma uncertainties on the PDF and αs respectively, while σold denotes the value of the αs uncertainty that is obtained by not determining simultaneously αs and the PDFs. (From Ref. [141]) corresponds to the major axis of the ellipse in the schematic depi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic representation of likelihood profiles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The χ 2 profile versus αs for data from NMC (left), affected by additive uncertainties, and HERA (right), with multiplicative uncertainties, computed using the t0 covariance matrix (top) or the experimental covariance matrix (bottom). values of αs determined from a new dataset using existing PDFs will lead to values that show an inflated deviation from the global best-fit, which in turn leads to instabilit… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of NNLO parton-to-pion FFs for the singlet combination Σ, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Lattice QCD results on the nucleon isovector unpolarized (left), strange-quark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (left) Preliminary continuum extrapolated results at the physical pion mass of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The singlet (left) and gluon (right) lowest truncated moments, Eq. (6), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: PDF-mediated sensitivities |Sf | of the projected high-luminosity EIC data (left) to Rs = (s(x, Q) + ¯s(x, Q))/(¯u(x, Q) + ¯d(x, Q)) at the x and Q2 values indicated on the axes; (right) to the PDF uncertainty of the Higgs boson production via gluon fusion at the LHC at 14 TeV. From [4]. quark distributions will be particularly well-constrained, with additional sensitivity to the gluon achieved through sc… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Impact of the BSM-induced bias on the uu¯ + d ¯d luminosity for the different scenarios discussed in the main text, all normalized to a consistent baseline PDF luminosity. The orange bands correspond to the central value and PDF uncertainties of a global PDF fit including HL-LHC Drell-Yan high-mass projections. The data have been generated according to a W′ model with MW′ = 13.8 TeV and the fit is done as… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Partonic momentum fractions in a proton at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Left: Comparison of valence pion PDFs and uncertainties from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of up, down, charm and gluon PDFs in the photon at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Synergies in luminosity and kinematic coverage for past, current and future [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Kinematic coverage of measurements at the proposed FPF including [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: 3.2. Current hints at saturation and EIC prospects It has been found that the gluon density inside the proton grows rapidly at small momentum fractions. QCD predicts that this growth can be regulated by nonlinear effects, ultimately leading to gluon saturation. Within the color glass condensate (CGC) framework, nonlinear QCD effects are predicted to suppress and broaden back-to-back angular correlations i… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Purity versus rapidity Y for different choices of expansion parameter ϵ (see [529, 534, 535]). at small x. On the one hand, both RHIC [536–538] and the LHC [539, 540] observed this predicted suppression in nucleus-involved collisions compared to the baseline p+p collisions at different collision energies, suggesting hints of gluon saturation. On the other hand, none of the experiments has claimed the obse… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Left: The correlation function of forward di- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Relative area and width of back-to-back di- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: (Left) Comparison of the 10−7 < x < 0.1 truncated integrals of helicity PDFs obtained in the JAMsmallx analyses from [600] with (red) and without (green) matching onto JAM-DGLAP extractions. (Right) Exclusion plot of two truncated integrals: the vertical axis shows the truncated integral of the total parton helicity contribution to the proton spin over the extrapolation/prediction range of 10−7 < x < 0.00… view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Di-hadron (π 0 ) distributions in the azimuthal angle ∆ϕ in proton-proton and deuteron-gold (or proton-gold) collisions: STAR data at √ s = 200 GeV vs. two theoretical calculations. Left: High-energy evolution (rcBK) but no Sudakov resummation [550]; the data are from [645]. Right: High-energy evolution (rcBK) plus Sudakov resummation [551]; the data are from [538]. equations also emerge from the CGC appr… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Photoproduction cross section of χc1 axial-vector charmonium in γ − p scattering, as a function of momentum transfer [612]. based on the BK equation with running coupling). The early calculation in Ref. [550] does not include the CSS evolution and thus predicts a relatively narrow back-to-back peak at ∆ϕ = π — considerably narrower than the respective data at RHIC [645]. The recent calculation in Ref. [55… view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Exclusive photoproduction of J/ψ for lead target, calculated using BFKL and BK evolutions for the dipole amplitude. Taken from Ref. [660]. background from vector ψ(2S) production (via Pomeron exchange) with subsequent radiative decay to χc1 + γ [654]. A powerful process for studying gluon saturation is exclusive heavy vector meson production. At leading order in perturbation theory, this process requires … view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Overview of C-VAIM architecture. 4. AI/ML for EIC physics Editors: Miguel Arratia, Huey-Wen Lin Contributors: Prasanna Balachandran, Leonard Gamberg, Thomas Gehrmann, Yeonju Go, Tim Hobbs, Tanja Horn, Brandon Kriesten, Xuan Li, Ming Liu, Yaohang Li, Alex NieMiera, Connor Pecar, Felix Ringer, Werner Vogelsang 4.1. AI for inverse problems The determination of physics parameters from experimental observables… view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Data flow chart for Fast-ML heavy flavor trigger system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p086_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Correlation metrics for heavy-flavor jet tagging (left column) and bottom jet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Example output of Dirichlet prior network demonstrating cases of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p090_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Illustration of event representation as a sparse geometric graph, adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Comparison with experimental data for the ATLAS 8 TeV measurements for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p100_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: Comparison between experimental data (black dots) and results obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p101_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: To best exploit the information on the CKS provided by lattice simulations, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p102_32.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: Left panel: Comparison between the results for the CS kernel at µ = 2 GeV from a representative set of lattice QCD determinations (colored points) and phenomenological extractions (colored bands). See Ref. [845] for details. Right panel: Monte Carlo replica distributions of the parameter g2 from the baseline fit (red), after reweighting (green), and from the simultaneous fit (blue) of Ref. [846]. The poin… view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: Generalized Sivers shift as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p105_33.png] view at source ↗
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: g1T and h ⊥ 1L worm-gear shifts as a function of bT . The lattice spacing a referenced in the lower panel is a = 0.114 fm. Remarkably, these results predict the magnitudes of the two shifts to differ by around a factor 2, whereas a wide variety of models of the nucleon (e.g., light-front constituent quark model, covariant parton model, bag model, light-front quark-diquark model, light-front version of the… view at source ↗
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: Left: The transverse-space gluon distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p115_35.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This document summarizes the discussions at the program "Precision QCD with the Electron Ion Collider", held from May to June 2025 at the Institute for Nuclear Theory (INT) at the University of Washington. The program was co-sponsored by the INT and by the Center for Frontiers in Nuclear Science (CFNS, Stony Brook University). Over its five-week duration it brought together about 70 theorists, experimentalists and computer scientists all interested in the physics program at the future Electron Ion Collider in preparation at Brookhaven National Laboratory. Key topics at the program were: higher-order perturbative-QCD calculations and techniques; nuclear structure and tomography; comparisons of phenomenological and lattice determinations of parton distribution functions; identification of signature observables for saturated gluons; assessment of the importance of AI techniques for EIC studies and detector development.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript summarizes the discussions at the five-week INT program 'Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider' held May-June 2025 at the University of Washington. Co-sponsored by INT and CFNS, it involved ~70 theorists, experimentalists, and computer scientists. The text lists five key topics: higher-order perturbative-QCD calculations and techniques; nuclear structure and tomography; comparisons of phenomenological and lattice determinations of parton distribution functions; identification of signature observables for saturated gluons; and assessment of AI techniques for EIC studies and detector development.

Significance. If the listed topics accurately reflect the program, the summary provides a concise archival record of community priorities for the EIC QCD program, correctly spanning perturbative methods, nuclear effects, lattice QCD, gluon saturation, and computational tools. A strength is its factual, claim-free description of the event scope without unsupported assertions or data. As a purely descriptive workshop note rather than a research article with derivations or results, its significance is modest and primarily documentary.

minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript text is essentially identical to the abstract and provides only a high-level list of topics without any elaboration on specific discussions, conclusions, or outcomes from the program.
  2. No references, links to talks, or further reading are included; adding such pointers would improve utility for readers interested in the listed topics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review of our manuscript summarizing the INT program 'Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider'. The referee's assessment correctly identifies the document as a factual, claim-free archival record of the workshop discussions and key topics. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The referee recommends minor revision, but the major comments section is empty and no specific changes or issues are identified in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely descriptive workshop summary with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

The document is a factual summary of discussions at an INT program on Precision QCD with the EIC. It lists key topics covered but advances no new physics claims, equations, predictions, or fitted quantities. There is no derivation chain, self-citation load-bearing argument, or any step that reduces to its own inputs by construction. The content is limited to reporting what was discussed, making circularity analysis inapplicable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The document is a workshop summary and introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. It reports on existing topics in the field without new theoretical constructs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5782 in / 1003 out tokens · 26917 ms · 2026-05-10T18:51:11.586875+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI-assisted modeling and Bayesian inference of unpolarized quark transverse momentum distributions from Drell-Yan data

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An AI-assisted Bayesian framework extracts TMD PDFs from global Drell-Yan data using surrogate models for scalable MCMC sampling.

  2. On the Two $R$-Factors in the Small-$x$ Shockwave Formalism

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Replacing the rapidity argument of the dipole amplitude with ln min{1/|x|, 1/|ξ|} and refining initial conditions for non-linear evolution can eliminate two R-factors in small-x shockwave calculations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Study of the fundamental structure of matter with an electron-ion collider

    Abhay Deshpande, Richard Milner, Raju Venugopalan, and Werner Vogelsang. Study of the fundamental structure of matter with an electron-ion collider. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 55:165–228, 2005

    2005

  2. [2]

    Boer et al.,Gluons and the quark sea at high energies: Distributions, polarization, tomography,1108.1713

    Daniel Boer et al. Gluons and the quark sea at high energies: Distributions, polarization, tomography. INT report INT-PUB-11-034. arXiv:1108.1713

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    Accardi et al

    A. Accardi et al. Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all. Eur. Phys. J. A, 52(9):268, 2016

    2016

  4. [4]

    Abdul Khalek et al

    R. Abdul Khalek et al. Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report. Nucl. Phys. A, 1026:122447, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Abdul Khalek et al., in2022 Snowmass Summer Study(2022),2203.13199

    R. Abdul Khalek et al. Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Electron Ion Collider for High Energy Physics. arXiv:2203.13199

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Abir et al

    Raktim Abir et al. The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC. arXiv:2305.14572

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt, and S. Moch. The Third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange. Nucl. Phys. B, 724:3–182, 2005

    2005

  8. [8]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider, and K. Sch¨ onwald. The three-loop single-mass heavy-flavor corrections to the structure functions F2(x, Q2) andg 1(x, Q2). 9 2025

    2025

  9. [9]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and A. Vogt. Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-quark case. Phys. Lett. B, 842:137944, 2023

    2023

  10. [10]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and A. Vogt. Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The gluon-to-quark case. Phys. Lett. B, 846:138215, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt. Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-to-gluon case. Phys. Lett. B, 856:138906, 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt. Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – the gluon-gluon case –. Phys. Lett. B, 860:139194, 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov, and T.-Z. Yang. CompleteN 2 f contributions to four-loop pure-singlet splitting functions. JHEP, 01:029, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov, and T.-Z. Yang. The NfCF3 contribution to the non-singlet splitting function at four-loop order. Phys. Lett. B, 849:138427, 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    E. B. Zijlstra and W. L. van Neerven. Order-α 2 s corrections to the polarized structure function g1(x, Q2). Nucl. Phys. B, 417:61–100, 1994. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 426, 245 (1994), Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 773, 105–106 (2007), Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 501, 599–599 (1997)]

    1994

  16. [16]

    S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt. The Three-Loop Splitting Functions in QCD: The Helicity-Dependent Case. Nucl. Phys. B, 889:351–400, 2014

    2014

  17. [17]

    Bl¨ umlein, P

    J. Bl¨ umlein, P. Marquard, C. Schneider, and K. Sch¨ onwald. The three-loop unpolarized and polarized non-singlet anomalous dimensions from off shell operator matrix elements. Nucl. Phys. B, 971:115542, 2021

    2021

  18. [18]

    Bl¨ umlein, P

    J. Bl¨ umlein, P. Marquard, C. Schneider, and K. Sch¨ onwald. The massless three-loop Wilson coefficients for the deep-inelastic structure functions F 2, FL, xF3 and g1. JHEP, 11:156, 2022

    2022

  19. [19]

    Ravindran

    Saurav Goyal, Sven-Olaf Moch, Vaibhav Pathak, Narayan Rana, and V. Ravindran. Next-to- Next-to-Leading Order QCD Corrections to Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(25):251902, 2024

    2024

  20. [20]

    Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD

    Leonardo Bonino, Thomas Gehrmann, and Giovanni Stagnitto. Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(25):251901, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    Lee, Sven-Olaf Moch, Vaibhav Pathak, Narayan Rana, and V

    Saurav Goyal, Roman N. Lee, Sven-Olaf Moch, Vaibhav Pathak, Narayan Rana, and V. Ravindran. Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD Corrections to Polarized Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:211905, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider124 Polarized Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD

    Leonardo Bonino, Thomas Gehrmann, Markus L¨ ochner, Kay Sch¨ onwald, and Giovanni Stagnitto. Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider124 Polarized Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(21):211904, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Neutral and charged current semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at NNLO QCD

    Leonardo Bonino, Thomas Gehrmann, Markus L¨ ochner, Kay Sch¨ onwald, and Giovanni Stagnitto. Neutral and charged current semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at NNLO QCD. JHEP, 10:016, 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Polarized Neutral and Charged Current Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at NNLO in QCD

    Leonardo Bonino, Thomas Gehrmann, Markus L¨ ochner, Kay Sch¨ onwald, and Giovanni Stagnitto. Polarized Neutral and Charged Current Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at NNLO in QCD. 9 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Lee, Sven-Olaf Moch, Vaibhav Pathak, and V

    Saurav Goyal, Roman N. Lee, Sven-Olaf Moch, Vaibhav Pathak, and V. Ravindran. NNLO QCD⊗QED corrections to unpolarized and polarized SIDIS. arXiv:2510.18872

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Single-valued representation of unpolarized and polarized semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at next-to-next-to-leading order

    Juliane Haug and Fabian Wunder. Single-valued representation of unpolarized and polarized semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at next-to-next-to-leading order. Phys. Rev. D, 112(11):114036, 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    Soft gluon resummation for the fragmentation of light and heavy quarks at large x

    Matteo Cacciari and Stefano Catani. Soft gluon resummation for the fragmentation of light and heavy quarks at large x. Nucl. Phys. B, 617:253–290, 2001

    2001

  28. [28]

    Anderle, Felix Ringer, and Werner Vogelsang

    Daniele P. Anderle, Felix Ringer, and Werner Vogelsang. QCD resummation for semi-inclusive hadron production processes. Phys. Rev. D, 87(3):034014, 2013

    2013

  29. [29]

    Anderle, Felix Ringer, and Werner Vogelsang

    Daniele P. Anderle, Felix Ringer, and Werner Vogelsang. Threshold resummation for polarized (semi-)inclusive deep inelastic scattering. Phys. Rev. D, 87:094021, 2013

    2013

  30. [30]

    Approximate NNLO QCD corrections to semi-inclusive DIS

    Maurizio Abele, Daniel de Florian, and Werner Vogelsang. Approximate NNLO QCD corrections to semi-inclusive DIS. Phys. Rev. D, 104(9):094046, 2021

    2021

  31. [31]

    Threshold resummation at NLL3 accuracy and approximate N3LO corrections to semi-inclusive DIS

    Maurizio Abele, Daniel de Florian, and Werner Vogelsang. Threshold resummation at NLL3 accuracy and approximate N3LO corrections to semi-inclusive DIS. Phys. Rev. D, 106(1):014015, 2022

    2022

  32. [32]

    Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Global Analysis of Polarized Parton Distribution Functions

    Ignacio Borsa, Marco Stratmann, Werner Vogelsang, Daniel de Florian, and Rodolfo Sassot. Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Global Analysis of Polarized Parton Distribution Functions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(15):151901, 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Valerio Bertone, Amedeo Chiefa, and Emanuele R. Nocera. Helicity-dependent parton distribution functions at next-to-next-to-leading order accuracy from inclusive and semi- inclusive deep-inelastic scattering data. Phys. Lett. B, 865:139497, 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Ravindran

    Saurav Goyal, Sven-Olaf Moch, Vaibhav Pathak, Narayan Rana, and V. Ravindran. Soft and virtual corrections to semi-inclusive DIS up to four loops in QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 113(3):034004, 2026

    2026

  35. [35]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour. A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD. Nucl. Phys. B, 485:291–419, 1997. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 510, 503–504 (1998)]

    1997

  36. [36]

    Frixione, Z

    S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt, and A. Signer. Three jet cross-sections to next-to-leading order. Nucl. Phys. B, 467:399–442, 1996

    1996

  37. [37]

    A new method for real radiation at NNLO

    Charalampos Anastasiou, Kirill Melnikov, and Frank Petriello. A new method for real radiation at NNLO. Phys. Rev. D, 69:076010, 2004

    2004

  38. [38]

    Binoth and G

    T. Binoth and G. Heinrich. Numerical evaluation of phase space integrals by sector decomposition. Nucl. Phys. B, 693:134–148, 2004

    2004

  39. [39]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, T

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, and E. W. Nigel Glover. Antenna subtraction at NNLO. JHEP, 09:056, 2005

    2005

  40. [40]

    An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC

    Stefano Catani and Massimiliano Grazzini. An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:222002, 2007

    2007

  41. [41]

    M. Czakon. Double-real radiation in hadronic top quark pair production as a proof of a certain concept. Nucl. Phys. B, 849:250–295, 2011

    2011

  42. [42]

    Nested soft-collinear subtractions in NNLO QCD computations

    Fabrizio Caola, Kirill Melnikov, and Raoul R¨ ontsch. Nested soft-collinear subtractions in NNLO QCD computations. Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(4):248, 2017

    2017

  43. [43]

    Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron- Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider125 positron collisions

    Vittorio Del Duca, Claude Duhr, Adam Kardos, G´ abor Somogyi, Zolt´ an Sz˝ or, Zolt´ an Tr´ ocs´ anyi, and Zolt´ an Tulip´ ant. Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron- Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider125 positron collisions. Phys. Rev. D, 94(7):074019, 2016

    2016

  44. [44]

    NNLO subtraction for any massless final state: a complete analytic expression

    Gloria Bertolotti, Lorenzo Magnea, Giovanni Pelliccioli, Alessandro Ratti, Chiara Signorile- Signorile, Paolo Torrielli, and Sandro Uccirati. NNLO subtraction for any massless final state: a complete analytic expression. JHEP, 07:140, 2023. [Erratum: JHEP 05, 019 (2024)]

    2023

  45. [45]

    Klasen and G

    M. Klasen and G. Kramer. Inclusive two jet production at HERA: Direct and resolved cross- sections in next-to-leading order QCD. Z. Phys. C, 76:67–74, 1997

    1997

  46. [46]

    Jet photoproduction at HERA

    Stefano Frixione and Giovanni Ridolfi. Jet photoproduction at HERA. Nucl. Phys. B, 507:315– 333, 1997

    1997

  47. [47]

    Multijet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering at next- to-leading order

    Zoltan Nagy and Zoltan Trocsanyi. Multijet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering at next- to-leading order. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:082001, 2001

    2001

  48. [48]

    Riemersma, J

    Eric Laenen, S. Riemersma, J. Smith, and W. L. van Neerven. Complete O (alpha-s) corrections to heavy flavor structure functions in electroproduction. Nucl. Phys. B, 392:162–228, 1993

    1993

  49. [49]

    Differential distributions for heavy flavor production at HERA

    Stefano Frixione, Paolo Nason, and Giovanni Ridolfi. Differential distributions for heavy flavor production at HERA. Nucl. Phys. B, 454:3–24, 1995

    1995

  50. [50]

    The p(T) spectrum in heavy flavor photoproduction

    Matteo Cacciari, Stefano Frixione, and Paolo Nason. The p(T) spectrum in heavy flavor photoproduction. JHEP, 03:006, 2001

    2001

  51. [51]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations. JHEP, 07:079, 2014

    2014

  52. [52]

    Event generation with Sherpa 3

    Enrico Bothmann et al. Event generation with Sherpa 3. JHEP, 12:156, 2024

    2024

  53. [53]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    Stefano Frixione, Paolo Nason, and Carlo Oleari. Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method. JHEP, 11:070, 2007

    2007

  54. [54]

    A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

    Christian Bierlich et al. A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3. SciPost Phys. Codeb., 2022:8, 2022

    2022

  55. [55]

    Herwig 7.3 release note

    Gavin Bewick et al. Herwig 7.3 release note. Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(10):1053, 2024

    2024

  56. [56]

    Photoproduction in general-purpose event generators

    Ilkka Helenius, Peter Meinzinger, Simon Pl¨ atzer, and Peter Richardson. Photoproduction in general-purpose event generators. arXiv:2406.08026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Resolved photons in Sherpa

    Stefan Hoeche, Frank Krauss, and Peter Meinzinger. Resolved photons in Sherpa. Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(2):178, 2024

    2024

  58. [58]

    Hadron-level NLO predictions for QCD observables in photo-production at the Electron-Ion Collider

    Peter Meinzinger and Frank Krauss. Hadron-level NLO predictions for QCD observables in photo-production at the Electron-Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. D, 109(3):034037, 2024

    2024

  59. [59]

    Rasmussen

    Ilkka Helenius and Christine O. Rasmussen. Hard diffraction in photoproduction with Pythia 8. Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(5):413, 2019

    2019

  60. [60]

    A POWHEG generator for deep inelastic scattering

    Andrea Banfi, Silvia Ferrario Ravasio, Barbara J¨ ager, Alexander Karlberg, Felix Reichenbach, and Giulia Zanderighi. A POWHEG generator for deep inelastic scattering. JHEP, 02:023, 2024

    2024

  61. [61]

    Event generation at MEPS@NLO accuracy in neutral and charged current DIS at the EIC

    Peter Meinzinger, Daniel Reichelt, and Federico Silvetti. Event generation at MEPS@NLO accuracy in neutral and charged current DIS at the EIC. Phys. Rev. D, 112(7):074039, 2025

    2025

  62. [62]

    Inclusive-jet and dijet production in polarized deep inelastic scattering

    Ignacio Borsa, Daniel de Florian, and Iv´ an Pedron. Inclusive-jet and dijet production in polarized deep inelastic scattering. Phys. Rev. D, 103(1):014008, 2021

    2021

  63. [63]

    Collider Physics at the Precision Frontier

    Gudrun Heinrich. Collider Physics at the Precision Frontier. Phys. Rept., 922:1–69, 2021

    2021

  64. [64]

    NNLO QCD corrections to jet production in deep inelastic scattering

    James Currie, Thomas Gehrmann, Alexander Huss, and Jan Niehues. NNLO QCD corrections to jet production in deep inelastic scattering. JHEP, 07:018, 2017. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 042 (2020)]

    2017

  65. [65]

    NNLOJET: a parton-level event generator for jet cross sections at NNLO QCD accuracy

    A. Huss et al. NNLOJET: a parton-level event generator for jet cross sections at NNLO QCD accuracy. arXiv:2503.22804

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    The unresolved behaviour of polarized scattering matrix elements at NNLO in QCD

    Thomas Gehrmann and Markus L¨ ochner. The unresolved behaviour of polarized scattering matrix elements at NNLO in QCD. JHEP, 02:097, 2026

    2026

  67. [67]

    TMD Handbook,

    Renaud Boussarie et al. TMD Handbook. arXiv:2304.03302

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Peng Sun, Joshua Isaacson, C. P. Yuan, and Feng Yuan. Nonperturbative functions for SIDIS Precision QCD with the Electron-Ion Collider126 and Drell–Yan processes. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 33(11):1841006, 2018

    2018

  69. [69]

    J. O. Gonzalez-Hernandez, T. C. Rogers, N. Sato, and B. Wang. Challenges with Large Transverse Momentum in Semi-Inclusive Deeply Inelastic Scattering. Phys. Rev. D, 98(11):114005, 2018

    2018

  70. [70]

    Difficulties in the description of Drell-Yan processes at moderate invariant mass and high transverse momentum

    Alessandro Bacchetta, Giuseppe Bozzi, Martin Lambertsen, Fulvio Piacenza, Julius Steiglechner, and Werner Vogelsang. Difficulties in the description of Drell-Yan processes at moderate invariant mass and high transverse momentum. Phys. Rev. D, 100(1):014018, 2019

    2019

  71. [71]

    Gauld, A

    R. Gauld, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss, I. Majer, and A. Rodriguez Garcia. Transverse momentum distributions in low-mass Drell-Yan lepton pair production at NNLO QCD. Phys. Lett. B, 829:137111, 2022

    2022

  72. [72]

    NNLO QCD corrections to hadron production in DIS at finite transverse momentum

    Liang Dong, Shen Fang, Jun Gao, Hai Tao Li, Ding Yu Shao, and Yu Jiao Zhu. NNLO QCD corrections to hadron production in DIS at finite transverse momentum. arXiv:2602.22972

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    Transverse-Momentum Subtraction for Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering

    Jun Gao, Hai Tao Li, Hua Xing Zhu, and Yu Jiao Zhu. Transverse-Momentum Subtraction for Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering. arXiv:2602.06364

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    K. J. Eskola, H. Honkanen, V. J. Kolhinen, Jian-wei Qiu, and C. A. Salgado. Nonlinear corrections to the DGLAP equations in view of the hera data. Nucl. Phys. B, 660:211–224, 2003

    2003

  75. [75]

    Structure functions and parton distributions

    Jian-wei Qiu. Structure functions and parton distributions. Nucl. Phys. A, 715:309–318, 2003

    2003

  76. [76]

    Resummed QCD power corrections to nuclear shadowing

    Jian-wei Qiu and Ivan Vitev. Resummed QCD power corrections to nuclear shadowing. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93:262301, 2004

    2004

  77. [77]

    Jian-wei Qiu and George F. Sterman. QCD and rescattering in nuclear targets. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 12:149, 2003

    2003

  78. [78]

    Luo, Jian-wei Qiu, and George F

    M. Luo, Jian-wei Qiu, and George F. Sterman. Anomalous nuclear enhancement in deeply inelastic scattering and photoproduction. Phys. Rev. D, 50:1951–1971, 1994

    1951

  79. [79]

    Multiple scattering, parton energy loss and modified fragmentation functions in deeply inelastic e A scattering

    Xiao-feng Guo and Xin-Nian Wang. Multiple scattering, parton energy loss and modified fragmentation functions in deeply inelastic e A scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:3591–3594, 2000

    2000

  80. [80]

    Multiple parton scattering in nuclei: Parton energy loss

    Xin-Nian Wang and Xiao-feng Guo. Multiple parton scattering in nuclei: Parton energy loss. Nucl. Phys. A, 696:788–832, 2001

    2001

Showing first 80 references.