Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues

As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 25 of 25 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.02754.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2606.02754 v1

Coverage vector

measured 25 of 25 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

measured 25 of 25 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

25 of 25 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved22
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch3

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 2b445953-4029-4d0e-b864-2af38d5bc3f0 · outbound

This paper cites OpenAI o1 System Card.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues OpenAI o1 System Card

Reference 1

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-01T22:36:17.649708Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

Observation e1fe9058-6292-4422-9f8e-acb6dd788a3a · outbound

This paper cites Rethinking Prospect Theory for LLMs: Revealing the Instability of Decision-Making under Epistemic Uncertainty.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Rethinking Prospect Theory for LLMs: Revealing the Instability of Decision-Making under Epistemic Uncertainty

Reference 2

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-01T22:36:17.652031Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

Observation fc218c6f-8bdd-4d52-ad8a-a21283c2250d · outbound

This paper cites Language Agents with Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Play in the Werewolf Game.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Language Agents with Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Play in the Werewolf Game

Reference 3

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-01T22:36:17.654445Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

Observation 54a57dbc-d1fe-40bb-b9e2-de9f4fba63c1 · outbound

This paper cites ChangeMyView.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues ChangeMyView

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation dcba1d50-1fed-4496-8fa3-54135be46422 · outbound

This paper cites The maximum length is 200 tokens.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues **The maximum length is 200 tokens**

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a0fa252e-f00d-469e-86f9-7351f4de295a · outbound

This paper cites The maximum length is 200 tokens.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues **The maximum length is 200 tokens**

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 74982d97-2774-4669-ba02-c8378c69204c · outbound

This paper cites The maximum length is 200 tokens.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues **The maximum length is 200 tokens**

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cacaac18-4ef8-413c-a9b2-029fffa214ee · outbound

This paper cites You are NOT an AI.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues You are NOT an AI

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fe3f7454-c230-430d-ac48-2323d1768e97 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f5edae7f-1c10-49ee-8bfd-58e627ae52ab · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 41f1d141-2447-4156-af5c-6ac70cc24b70 · outbound

This paper cites The maximum length is 200 tokens.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues **The maximum length is 200 tokens**

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 00a35df5-b0ba-40e9-bc60-4fa734625f4d · outbound

This paper cites Read through previous messages and ensure that your response is logically coherent.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Read through previous messages and ensure that your response is logically coherent

Reference 22

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 73ed5c1c-08b0-4720-8c5f-67d4806876cc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7b362897-9704-437f-aa94-dd3e1d913b99 · outbound

This paper cites or", "possibly.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues or", "possibly

Reference 24

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6fc3597d-e13c-4694-8d4c-bc5b0c45f573 · outbound

This paper cites - 5: User B’s arguments are sensible and well-structured, with only minor issues that do not significantly detract from the overall quality.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues - 5: User B’s arguments are sensible and well-structured, with only minor issues that do not significantly detract from the overall quality

Reference 25

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6489d787-dd41-4188-900f-159fa5deef16 · outbound

This paper cites Focus on the uniqueness of the user.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Focus on the uniqueness of the user

Reference 26

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d641488d-1206-4dda-b00e-7c27971b1ff2 · outbound

This paper cites general_conversation_quality.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues general_conversation_quality

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ee4fd22d-f698-4586-b4e2-38a53ede04e9 · outbound

This paper cites Reference Criteria: - 1: User B don’t provide helpful and concrete responses to User A’s dilemmas.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Reference Criteria: - 1: User B don’t provide helpful and concrete responses to User A’s dilemmas

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e20cc233-f234-4cf9-a3f0-2e6e595e3897 · outbound

This paper cites Focus on the implicit features.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues Focus on the implicit features

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d18738fb-898b-44e0-91d8-1888fc10284f · outbound

This paper cites general_conversation_quality.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues general_conversation_quality

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f8bfaaf2-068a-4f3e-bd49-672314d99b00 · outbound

This paper cites - 5: User B communicates the request with good clarity and politeness, but may lack minor details, or full coherence.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues - 5: User B communicates the request with good clarity and politeness, but may lack minor details, or full coherence

Reference 31

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ea3bb463-b466-42fc-9b72-00c7b10aec15 · outbound

This paper cites - 5: User B’s words and strategies show adaptation to User A’s profile that is not comprehensive, covering some entries in A’s profile.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues - 5: User B’s words and strategies show adaptation to User A’s profile that is not comprehensive, covering some entries in A’s profile

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 13671db5-e374-408b-b27d-5f329c0afcfb · outbound

This paper cites general_conversation_quality.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues general_conversation_quality

Reference 33

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 78aeddce-fc17-4ef9-a3c8-df18d2aa087c · outbound

This paper cites A model that can’t be wrong isn’t really helping you understand reality; it’s functioning more like a comforting story.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues A model that can’t be wrong isn’t really helping you understand reality; it’s functioning more like a comforting story

Reference 34

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation ee178d19-758c-4ba7-9634-6f7a037cc0a9 · outbound

This paper cites you” (in some higher sense) chose every challenge, then extreme trauma, genocide, or a child dying of illness become “interesting plot twists.

$\Psi$-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues you” (in some higher sense) chose every challenge, then extreme trauma, genocide, or a child dying of illness become “interesting plot twists

Reference 35

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-28T15:11:50.051343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.