pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02787 · v1 · pith:XBENSHMKnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🧮 math.OC

Adaptive Accelerated Mirror Descent in Primal and Dual Spaces

Zeyi Xu , Long Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords adaptive mirror descentaccelerated optimizationrelative smoothnessLyapunov perturbation budgetconvex optimizationprimal dual spaceshomotopy methodmirror geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Adaptive Accelerated Mirror Descent achieves accelerated convergence for convex problems by tolerating local descent failures through an accumulated Lyapunov perturbation budget under dual relative smoothness and a mirror-geometry compatibi

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Adaptive Accelerated Mirror Descent as a flow-based method that merges nonlinear preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity inside mirror descent. It tracks an accumulated Lyapunov perturbation budget so that occasional descent failures are permitted provided the running total stays nonpositive, with line search invoked only to protect stability. Accelerated rates are proved when dual relative smoothness or convexity holds together with a mirror-geometry compatibility condition. For convex objectives a homotopy argument then yields an O(1/k^2) rate once sublevel sets are bounded. Experiments on relative-smoothness problems indicate that the full combination of preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity outperforms approaches that use only some of these ingredients.

Core claim

AAMD is a flow-based optimization method that combines nonlinear preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity in mirror geometry. The central mechanism is an accumulated Lyapunov perturbation budget that tolerates local descent failures provided the cumulative budget remains nonpositive. Under dual relative smoothness and convexity together with a mirror-geometry compatibility condition, the method achieves accelerated convergence. For convex objectives, homotopy under a bounded-sublevel-set assumption delivers an O(1/k^2) rate.

What carries the argument

The accumulated Lyapunov perturbation budget, which permits local descent failures provided the total budget remains nonpositive and triggers line search only when stability is at risk.

If this is right

  • Accelerated convergence holds under dual relative smoothness or convexity paired with the mirror-geometry compatibility condition.
  • An O(1/k^2) rate follows for convex objectives via homotopy once sublevel sets are bounded.
  • Practical performance improves when preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity are used together on relative-smoothness problems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The budget mechanism could be tested in stochastic or noisy gradient settings where occasional step failures are routine.
  • The same compatibility condition between primal and dual geometries may suggest new ways to choose mirror maps for other first-order schemes.
  • The homotopy construction might be adapted to obtain fast rates in settings where standard acceleration assumptions are only partially satisfied.

Load-bearing premise

The mirror-geometry compatibility condition and the bounded-sublevel-set assumption must both hold for the homotopy to produce the O(1/k^2) rate.

What would settle it

An explicit convex problem satisfying dual relative smoothness and convexity but violating the mirror-geometry compatibility condition where the claimed accelerated rate fails to appear, or an unbounded sublevel set where the homotopy argument ceases to deliver O(1/k^2).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02787 by Long Chen, Zeyi Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Log relative error vs. execution time. Red dots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Estimation of Lk and αk vs. number of gradient evaluations on the regularized logistic re￾gression task. Red dots indicate the gradient steps incurred by line search. Polynomial-of-norm objectives. In the experiment, we use the quartic benchmark from [13]: f(x) = 1 4 ∥Ax − b∥ 4 + 1 3 ∥Bx∥ 3 + 1 2 ∥Cx∥ 2 , (21) where A, B, C are positive definite matrices. Thus f is dual relatively smooth and strongly conve… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Log relative error vs. execution time on the quartic objective. Red dots in￾dicate the gradient steps incurred by line search. [4] Long Chen and Hao Luo. First order optimization methods based on hessian-driven nesterov accelerated gradient flow, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.09276. 4 [5] Long Chen, Luo Hao, and Jingrong Wei. Accelerated gradient methods through variable and operator splitting, 2025… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Upper approximation of Df at x. Step 3: Evaluate hϕ(x) − hϕ(z ⋆ ). First, hϕ(x) = h(x). For z = z ⋆ , using (28), z ⋆ − x = −∇ϕ ∗ (χ) + ∇ϕ ∗ (η), z⋆ − x + = ∇ϕ ∗ (η), x − x + = ∇ϕ ∗ (χ), we obtain hϕ(z ⋆ ) = h(x) + ⟨χ − η, z⋆ − x⟩ + Dϕ(z ⋆ − x +, x − x +) = h(x) + ⟨χ − η, ∇ϕ ∗ (η) − ∇ϕ ∗ (χ)⟩ + Dϕ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lower approximation of Df ∗ at η. Step 2: Compute the minimizer v ⋆ of hϕ∗ . The gradient of the nonconstant part of hϕ∗ is ∇v  ⟨∇h(η), v − η⟩ + Dϕ∗ (v, η)  = ∇h(η) + ∇ϕ ∗ (v) − ∇ϕ ∗ (η). Setting this to zero yields ∇ϕ ∗ (v ⋆ ) = ∇ϕ ∗ (η) − ∇h(η) = ∇ϕ ∗ (η) − (y − x) = x − y +, (31) that is, v ⋆ = ∇ϕ(x − y +). Step 3: Evaluate the height of the lower model. Since hϕ∗ (η) = h(η), we compute hϕ∗ (η) − hϕ∗ … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose Adaptive Accelerated Mirror Descent (AAMD), a flow-based method that combines nonlinear preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity in mirror geometry. The key ingredient is an accumulated Lyapunov perturbation budget: local descent failures are allowed as long as the total budget remains nonpositive, so line search is used only when stability is at risk. We prove accelerated convergence under dual relative smoothness/convexity and a mirror-geometry compatibility condition, and obtain an $O(1/k^2)$ rate for convex objectives by homotopy under a bounded-sublevel-set assumption. Experiments on relative-smoothness problems show that combining preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity gives substantial gains over methods using only part of this structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Adaptive Accelerated Mirror Descent (AAMD), a flow-based method that combines nonlinear preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity in mirror geometry. The key ingredient is an accumulated Lyapunov perturbation budget: local descent failures are allowed as long as the total budget remains nonpositive, so line search is used only when stability is at risk. The authors prove accelerated convergence under dual relative smoothness/convexity and a mirror-geometry compatibility condition, and obtain an O(1/k^2) rate for convex objectives by homotopy under a bounded-sublevel-set assumption. Experiments on relative-smoothness problems show that combining preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity gives substantial gains over methods using only part of this structure.

Significance. If the results hold, this work is significant for providing a new adaptive method for accelerated mirror descent with proofs in both primal and dual spaces. The accumulated Lyapunov perturbation budget is presented as a design choice, which is a strength. The homotopy approach for the O(1/k^2) rate under the bounded-sublevel-set assumption is a useful extension. The empirical results support the practical value of the combined approach.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the work and for recommending acceptance. We are pleased that the combination of preconditioning, acceleration, and adaptivity via the Lyapunov budget, along with the homotopy argument for the O(1/k^2) rate, was viewed as a useful contribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and reader's summary describe a proposed algorithm with a Lyapunov perturbation budget and convergence proofs under stated assumptions (dual relative smoothness, mirror-geometry compatibility, bounded sublevel sets). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are exhibited that reduce any claimed rate or result to a definition by construction. The central claims are presented as theorems under explicit conditions rather than tautological renamings or post-hoc fits. Without load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatzes smuggled via prior work in the visible text, the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on three domain assumptions stated in the abstract: dual relative smoothness/convexity, mirror-geometry compatibility, and bounded sublevel sets for the homotopy argument. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Dual relative smoothness/convexity holds for the objective
    Invoked to prove accelerated convergence
  • domain assumption Mirror-geometry compatibility condition
    Required for the convergence proof under the stated geometry
  • domain assumption Bounded-sublevel-set assumption
    Used for the O(1/k^2) rate via homotopy on convex objectives

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5636 in / 1398 out tokens · 17457 ms · 2026-06-28T13:15:18.539806+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bertsekas.Convex Optimization Theory

    D. Bertsekas.Convex Optimization Theory. Athena Scientific optimization and computation series. Athena Scientific, 2009. ISBN 9781886529311. 3

    2009

  2. [2]

    Adaptive backtracking line search

    Joao V Cavalcanti, Laurent Lessard, and Ashia C Wilson. Adaptive backtracking line search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13150, 2024. 5

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Convergence analysis of a proximal-like minimization algo- rithm using Bregman functions.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 3(3):538–543, 1993

    Gong Chen and Marc Teboulle. Convergence analysis of a proximal-like minimization algo- rithm using Bregman functions.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 3(3):538–543, 1993. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/0803026. 3 9 The results are shown in Fig. 3. Since the prob- lem is not strongly convex, all methods show sublinear convergence. AAMD outperforms the tested ba...

    work page doi:10.1137/0803026 1993

  4. [4]

    First order optimization methods based on hessian-driven nesterov accelerated gradient flow, 2019

    Long Chen and Hao Luo. First order optimization methods based on hessian-driven nesterov accelerated gradient flow, 2019. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1912.09276. 4

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Accelerated gradient methods through variable and operator splitting, 2025

    Long Chen, Luo Hao, and Jingrong Wei. Accelerated gradient methods through variable and operator splitting, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04065. 2, 18

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Accelerated mirror descent method through variable and operator splitting, 2026

    Long Chen, Hao Luo, Jingrong Wei, Zeyi Xu, and Yuan Yao. Accelerated mirror descent method through variable and operator splitting, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2601.19038. 2

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Taylor, Alexandre d’Aspremont, and Jérôme Bolte

    Radu-Alexandru Dragomir, Adrien B. Taylor, Alexandre d’Aspremont, and Jérôme Bolte. Op- timal complexity and certification of Bregman first-order methods.Mathematical Program- ming, 194(1):41–83, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-021-01618-1. 2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10107-021-01618-1 2022

  8. [8]

    Accelerated bregman proximal gradient meth- ods for relatively smooth convex optimization.Computational Optimization and Applica- tions, 79:405 – 440, 2018

    Filip Hanzely, Peter Richtárik, and Lin Xiao. Accelerated bregman proximal gradient meth- ods for relatively smooth convex optimization.Computational Optimization and Applica- tions, 79:405 – 440, 2018. URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 52585212. 9

    2018

  9. [9]

    Accelerated bregman proximal gradient methods for relatively smooth convex optimization.Computational Optimization and Applications, 79 (2):405–440, 2021

    Filip Hanzely, Peter Richtárik, and Lin Xiao. Accelerated bregman proximal gradient methods for relatively smooth convex optimization.Computational Optimization and Applications, 79 (2):405–440, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s10589-021-00273-8. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1007/s10589-021-00273-8. 2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10589-021-00273-8 2021

  10. [10]

    Mirror duality in convex optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17296, 2023

    Jaeyeon Kim, Chanwoo Park, Asuman Ozdaglar, Jelena Diakonikolas, and Ernest K Ryu. Mirror duality in convex optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17296, 2023. 1, 2

    arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Accelerated mirror descent in contin- uous and discrete time

    Walid Krichene, Alexandre Bayen, and Peter L Bartlett. Accelerated mirror descent in contin- uous and discrete time. In C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, edi- tors,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 28. Curran Associates, Inc.,

  12. [12]

    URLhttps://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2015/ file/f60bb6bb4c96d4df93c51bd69dcc15a0-Paper.pdf. 1

    2015

  13. [13]

    Anisotropic proximal gradient.Mathematical Pro- gramming, pages 1–45, 2025

    Emanuel Laude and Panagiotis Patrinos. Anisotropic proximal gradient.Mathematical Pro- gramming, pages 1–45, 2025. 2, 3, 8, 9, 12

    2025

  14. [14]

    Freund, and Yurii Nesterov

    Haihao Lu, Robert M. Freund, and Yurii Nesterov. Relatively smooth convex optimization by first-order methods, and applications.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 28(1):333–354, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1099546. 3, 8, 9

    work page doi:10.1137/16m1099546 2018

  15. [15]

    Dual space precondi- tioning for gradient descent.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 31(1):991–1016, 2021

    Chris J Maddison, Daniel Paulin, Yee Whye Teh, and Arnaud Doucet. Dual space precondi- tioning for gradient descent.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 31(1):991–1016, 2021. 1, 2, 3, 8

    2021

  16. [16]

    Adaptive gradient descent without descent.arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09529, 2019

    Yura Malitsky and Konstantin Mishchenko. Adaptive gradient descent without descent.arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09529, 2019. 2 10

    arXiv 1910

  17. [17]

    Adaptive proximal gradient method for convex optimization.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:100670–100697, 2024

    Yura Malitsky and Konstantin Mishchenko. Adaptive proximal gradient method for convex optimization.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:100670–100697, 2024. 2

    2024

  18. [18]

    Arkadi Nemirovski. Prox-method with rate of convergence o(1/t) for variational in- equalities with lipschitz continuous monotone operators and smooth convex-concave sad- dle point problems.SIAM Journal on Optimization, 15(1):229–251, 2004. doi: 10.1137/ S1052623403425629. 1

    2004

  19. [19]

    A Wiley-Interscience publication

    Arkadij Semenovi ˇc Nemirovskij and David Borisovich Yudin.Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization. A Wiley-Interscience publication. Wiley, 1983. ISBN 9780471103455. 1

    1983

  20. [20]

    A method of solving a convex programming problem with convergence rate o 1 k2 .Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 269(3):543–547, 1983

    Yurii Nesterov. A method of solving a convex programming problem with convergence rate o 1 k2 .Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 269(3):543–547, 1983. 1, 8, 9

    1983

  21. [21]

    Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions.Mathematical Programming, 103(1):127–152, 2005

    Yurii Nesterov. Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions.Mathematical Programming, 103(1):127–152, 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-004-0552-5. 1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0552-5 2005

  22. [22]

    Non- linearly preconditioned gradient methods under generalized smoothness.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08532, 2025

    Konstantinos Oikonomidis, Jan Quan, Emanuel Laude, and Panagiotis Patrinos. Non- linearly preconditioned gradient methods under generalized smoothness.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08532, 2025. 1

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Tyrrell Rockafellar.Convex Analysis

    R. Tyrrell Rockafellar.Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, 1970. ISBN 9780691015866. URLhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14bs1ff. 3

    1970

  24. [24]

    Adaptive accelerated gradient descent methods for convex optimiza- tion, 2026

    Zeyi Xu and Long Chen. Adaptive accelerated gradient descent methods for convex optimiza- tion, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19013. 2, 8

    arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    curvature

    Ya-Xiang Yuan and Yi Zhang. Analyze accelerated mirror descent via high-resolution ODEs. Journal of the Operations Research Society of China, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40305-024-00542-3. 1 11 A Discussion: Relation to Anisotropic Smoothness/Convexity Laude et al. (2025) proposed the anisotropic descent (smoothness) and convexity conditions [12]...

    2024