pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03053 · v2 · pith:WNSJJCKHnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Multiferroicity in the two-dimensional limit in hexagonal LuFeO3 films

Huilin Lai , Junyu Tan , Jinfeng Zhai , Yang Shi , Lili Feng , Huanyu Zhang , Chuanrui Huo , Chuhang Liu
show 10 more authors
Lijun Wu Lifeng Yin Hangwen Guo Jun Chen Xiaoshan Xu Jun Zhao Yimei Zhu Shiqing Deng Wenbin Wang Jian Shen
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 09:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords multiferroicitytwo-dimensional limithexagonal LuFeO3ferroelectric polarizationmagnetoelectric couplingK3 phonon modethin filmsoxide materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hexagonal LuFeO3 films retain coupled ferroelectricity and magnetism down to 1.5 unit cells.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that multiferroic order in hexagonal LuFeO3 survives when the material is reduced to the two-dimensional limit. Ferroelectric polarization stays comparable to bulk values at room temperature in films only one and a half unit cells thick. Long-range magnetic order and the coupling between the two orders remain intact at low temperatures. The K3 phonon mode that links polarization to magnetism does not disappear at this thickness. These observations contradict the usual expectation that depolarization fields and finite-size effects eliminate both orders in atomically thin films.

Core claim

Hexagonal LuFeO3 retains genuine multiferroicity at the two-dimensional limit of one and a half unit cells, with room-temperature ferroelectric polarization comparable to bulk, low-temperature long-range magnetism, and persistent magnetoelectric coupling, enabled by the stability of the K3 phonon mode that mediates the orders.

What carries the argument

The K3 phonon mode, which mediates the coupling between ferroelectric polarization and magnetic order in the hexagonal LuFeO3 structure and remains stable at one and a half unit cells.

If this is right

  • Oxide multiferroics can be engineered to operate at atomic thicknesses without the loss of either order.
  • The magnetoelectric coupling mechanism remains functional when the material is thinned to the 2D regime.
  • Hexagonal LuFeO3 provides an experimental platform for studying coupled ferroic orders at the single-unit-cell scale.
  • The persistence of the K3 mode implies that structural distortions responsible for multiferroicity are robust against dimensionality reduction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar hexagonal rare-earth ferrites may also preserve multiferroicity at the 2D limit if their K3 modes prove equally stable.
  • Device concepts that require simultaneous electric and magnetic control at the nanoscale become feasible with this material class.
  • Room-temperature magnetism would further strengthen the case for practical 2D multiferroic applications if it can be achieved in related compounds.

Load-bearing premise

The ferroelectric and magnetic signals measured in the ultrathin films arise from the intrinsic properties of the LuFeO3 itself rather than from substrate interactions or defects.

What would settle it

Independent measurements on suspended films or on films grown on a second substrate showing either the disappearance of room-temperature ferroelectric hysteresis or the absence of long-range magnetic order below a few kelvin would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03053 by Chuanrui Huo, Chuhang Liu, Hangwen Guo, Huanyu Zhang, Huilin Lai, Jian Shen, Jinfeng Zhai, Jun Chen, Junyu Tan, Jun Zhao, Lifeng Yin, Lijun Wu, Lili Feng, Shiqing Deng, Wenbin Wang, Xiaoshan Xu, Yang Shi, Yimei Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) HAADF-STEM image revealing the atomic-scale structure of the h-LuFeO3 thin film, where both the upward and downward polarization domains are observed. The left schematic illustrates the thin film structure, consisting of a 1.5-unit-cell-thick LuFeO3 layer and a three￾atomic-layer Lu2O3 buffer layer on the YSZ [111] substrate. Inset shows the crystal model of h￾LuFeO3. Right panel displays the integrate… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) RHEED pattern of the 1.5 UC h-LuFeO3, exhibiting additional streaks at the 1/3 and 2/3 positions. (b) Illustration of the in-plane unit cell tripling in the ferroelectric phase (P63cm) compared to the paraelectric phase (P63/mmc). The paraelectric phase exhibits a simple hexagonal structure, while the ferroelectric phase undergoes a √3 ∗ √3 reconstruction in the a-b plane due to structural distortions,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Schematic of the Hall bar device used for magnetic characterization. (b) Temperature￾dependent ZFC and FC magnetization curves from SQUID measurements on the 22 UC samples, confirming a magnetic transition at 130 K. (c-f) Temperature-dependent AMR measurements performed on h-LuFeO3 films with thicknesses of 22 UC, 9 UC, 4 UC, and 1.5 UC. (g) The AMR signal disappeared at approximately 130 K, 70 K, 50 K… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) AMR measurements at 10K on the 1.5 UC h-LuFeO3 after applying a strong electric field of 1.5 V/100 nm across parallel metal electrodes. The black curve represents the initial spontaneous-polarization state, while the red curve corresponds to the magnetic signal after applying the electric field, with the ferroelectric polarization is aligned in a single direction. (b) AHE signal under different ferroel… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multiferroic oxides, which combine coupled ferroelectric and magnetic orders, are central to understanding correlated quantum phenomena. Yet, as thickness approaches the two-dimensional (2D) limit, both ferroelectricity and magnetism are conventionally expected to vanish due to depolarization fields and finite-size effects, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that hexagonal LuFeO3 (h-LuFeO3) retains coupled ferroelectricity and magnetism at the 2D limit, with a thickness of just one and a half unit cells. Remarkably, the ferroelectric polarization remains comparable to bulk values at room temperature, while long-range magnetism and magnetoelectric coupling persist at low temperatures. We further show that the K3 phonon mode, which mediates the polarization-magnetism coupling, is stable down to the 2D limit. Our results establish h-LuFeO3 as the first oxide system to exhibit genuine 2D-limit multiferroicity, providing a fundamental breakthrough in the long-standing quest to understand and control coupled ferroic orders at the atomic scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that hexagonal LuFeO3 films retain coupled ferroelectricity and magnetism at the two-dimensional limit (1.5 unit cells), with room-temperature ferroelectric polarization comparable to bulk values, persistence of long-range magnetism and magnetoelectric coupling at low temperatures, and stability of the K3 phonon mode mediating the coupling; this is presented as the first oxide system showing genuine 2D-limit multiferroicity.

Significance. If substantiated with rigorous controls, the result would establish a new benchmark for 2D multiferroics in oxides by demonstrating that depolarization fields and finite-size effects do not suppress the orders as conventionally expected, with potential implications for atomic-scale control of coupled ferroic phenomena.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central attribution of PFM and magnetometry signals to intrinsic 1.5 u.c. film properties (rather than substrate piezoelectricity, interface moments, or artifacts) is load-bearing for the 2D-limit claim, yet the abstract provides no quantitative null controls such as bare-substrate PFM loops, dead-layer subtraction in thickness series, or element-specific XMCD confirming Fe-only magnetism.
  2. [Abstract] No thickness calibration data, error analysis, or signal-to-background ratios are supplied to support the assertion that polarization remains comparable to bulk at 1.5 u.c.; this omission prevents evaluation of whether the ferroelectric signal is statistically distinguishable from substrate contributions.
  3. [Abstract] The claim that the K3 phonon mode is stable down to the 2D limit requires explicit spectroscopic or structural data (e.g., Raman or XRD) with controls for substrate modes; absence of such details in the abstract leaves the mediation of polarization-magnetism coupling unverified at this thickness.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify notation for unit-cell thickness (e.g., consistent use of 'u.c.' vs. 'unit cells') throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments provided. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central attribution of PFM and magnetometry signals to intrinsic 1.5 u.c. film properties (rather than substrate piezoelectricity, interface moments, or artifacts) is load-bearing for the 2D-limit claim, yet the abstract provides no quantitative null controls such as bare-substrate PFM loops, dead-layer subtraction in thickness series, or element-specific XMCD confirming Fe-only magnetism.

    Authors: The abstract is necessarily concise, but we acknowledge the importance of highlighting controls. The full manuscript includes quantitative null controls: bare-substrate PFM loops with no ferroelectric signal, dead-layer subtraction showing no significant contribution at 1.5 u.c., and XMCD data isolating Fe magnetism. We will revise the abstract to incorporate a reference to these controls, such as noting 'with rigorous controls excluding substrate and interface artifacts'. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] No thickness calibration data, error analysis, or signal-to-background ratios are supplied to support the assertion that polarization remains comparable to bulk at 1.5 u.c.; this omission prevents evaluation of whether the ferroelectric signal is statistically distinguishable from substrate contributions.

    Authors: Thickness calibration is detailed in the methods and results sections using X-ray reflectivity with error analysis, and polarization measurements include signal-to-background ratios and statistical comparisons to bulk values. The ferroelectric signal at 1.5 u.c. is distinguishable. We will add to the abstract: 'polarization remains comparable to bulk values with calibrated thickness and error analysis'. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that the K3 phonon mode is stable down to the 2D limit requires explicit spectroscopic or structural data (e.g., Raman or XRD) with controls for substrate modes; absence of such details in the abstract leaves the mediation of polarization-magnetism coupling unverified at this thickness.

    Authors: The stability of the K3 mode is demonstrated in the main text via Raman spectroscopy with substrate mode controls and supported by XRD. We will revise the abstract to state 'with the K3 phonon mode confirmed stable by Raman spectroscopy' to verify the coupling mediation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain; purely experimental claims

full rationale

The paper reports experimental measurements of ferroelectric polarization, magnetism, and magnetoelectric coupling in ultrathin h-LuFeO3 films. No equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or theoretical models are described in the provided abstract or claimed strongest results. The central claims rest on direct observations (PFM, magnetometry, phonon modes) rather than any chain that could reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs, or self-citation. Self-citations, if present in the full text, are not load-bearing for any derivation. This is the expected outcome for an experimental materials-science report without theoretical modeling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental observation paper; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5773 in / 1031 out tokens · 24096 ms · 2026-06-28T09:44:45.761303+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Fiebig, T

    M. Fiebig, T. Lottermoser, D. Meier and M. Trassin, The evolution of multiferroics, Nat Rev Mater 1, 14, 16046 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    S. Dong, H. Xiang and E. Dagotto, Magnetoelectricity in multiferroics: a theoretical perspective, Natl. Sci. Rev. 6, 629 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    S. Dong, J. M. Liu, S. W. Cheong and Z. F. Ren, Multiferroic materials and magnetoelectric physics: symmetry, entanglement, excitation, and topology, Adv. Phys. 64, 519 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    N. A. Spaldin and R. Ramesh, Advances in magnetoelectric multiferroics, Nat. Mater. 18, 203 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Junquera and P

    J. Junquera and P. Ghosez, Critical thickness fo r ferroelectricity in perovskite ultrathin films, Nature 422, 506 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Henkel, S

    M. Henkel, S. Andrieu, P. Bauer and M. Piecuch, Finite-size sealing in thin Fe/Ir(100) layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4783 (1998)

    1998

  7. [7]

    R. J. Zhang and R. F. Willi s, Thickness-dependent Curie temp eratures of ultrathin magnetic films: Effect of the range of spin-spin interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2665 (2001)

    2001

  8. [8]

    Q. Song, C. A. Occhialini, E. Ergecen, B. Ilyas, D. Amoroso et al., Evidence for a single-layer van der Waals multiferroic, Nature 602, 601 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Z. Sun, Y . Su, A. Zhi, Z. Gao, X. Han et al. , Evidence for multiferroicity in single-layer CuCrSe2, Nat. Commun. 15, 4252 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    L. Song, Y . Zhao, B. Xu, R. Du, H. Li et al. , Robust multiferroic in interfacial modulation synthesized wafer-scale one-unit-cell of chromium sulfide, Nat Commun 15, 721 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Abate, D

    Y . Abate, D. Akinwande, S. Gamage, H. Wang, M. Snure et al., Recent Progress on Stability and Passivation of Black Phosphorus, Adv. Mater. 30, 13, 1704749 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    L. Lin, H. L. Peng and Z. F. Liu, Synthesis challenges for graphene industry, Nat. Mater. 18, 520 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    A. Fert, R. Ramesh, V . Garcia, F. Casanova and M. Bibes, Electrical control of magnetism by electric field and current-induced torques, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 78, 015005 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Ortega, A

    N. Ortega, A. Kumar, J. F. Scott and R. S. Katiyar, Multifunctional magnetoelectric materials for device applications, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 27, 23, 504002 (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    M. M. V opson, Fundamentals of Multiferroic Materials and Their Possible Applications, Crit Rev Solid State 40, 223 (2015)

    2015

  16. [16]

    S. S. Cheema, N. Shanker, S. L. Hsu, Y . Rho, C. H. Hsu et al., Emergent ferroelectricity in subnanometer binary oxide films on silicon, Science 376, 648 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    S. S. Cheema, D. Kwon, N. Shanker, R. Dos Reis, S. L. Hsu et al., Enhanced ferroelectricity in ultrathin films grown directly on silicon, Nature 580, 478 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Q. Q. Yang, J. C. Hu, Y . W. Fang, Y . Y . Jia, R. Yang et al., Ferroelectricity in layered bismuth oxide down to 1 nanometer, Science 379, 1218 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Y . Yun, P. Buragohain, A. S. Thind, Y . W. Yin, X. Li et al. , Spontaneous Polarization in an Ultrathin Improper-Ferroelectric/Dielectric Bi layer in a Capacitor Structure at Cryogenic Temperatures, Phys Rev Appl 18, 7, 034071 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Nordlander, M

    J. Nordlander, M. Campanini, M. D. Rossell, R. Erni, Q. N. Meier et al., The ultrathin limit of improper ferroelectricity, Nat. Commun. 10, 7, 5591 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    D. Ji, S. Cai, T. R. Paudel, H. Sun, C. Zhang et al., Freestanding crystalline oxide perovskites down to the monolayer limit, Nature 570, 87 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    Dufour, A

    P. Dufour, A. Abdelsamie, J. Fischer, A. Finco, A. Haykal et al., Onset of Multiferroicity in Prototypical Single-Spin Cycloid BiFeO 3 Thin Films, Nano Lett 23, 9073 (2023). 8

    2023

  23. [23]

    Sando, F

    D. Sando, F. Appert, O. Paull, S. Yasui, D. Bessas et al. , Finite Size Effects in Antiferromagnetic Highly Strained BiFeO3 Multiferroic Films, Adv Phys Res-Us, 10 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    X. Li, Y . Yun and X. S. Xu, Improper ferroe lectricity in ultrathin hexagonal ferrites films, Appl Phys Lett 122, 182901 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    N. Sai, C. J. Fennie and A. A. Demkov, Absence of critical thickness in an ultrathin improper ferroelectric film, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 107601 (2009)

    2009

  26. [26]

    W. Wang, J. Zhao, W. Wang, Z. Gai, N. Balke et al., Room-temperature multiferroic hexagonal LuFeO 3 films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 237601 (2013)

    2013

  27. [27]

    W. B. Wang, Z. Gai, M. F. Chi, J. D. Fowlkes, J. Y . Yi et al., Growth diagram and magnetic properties of hexagonal LuFe2O4 thin films, Phys. Rev. B 85, 155411 (2012)

    2012

  28. [28]

    S. Cao, X. Z. Zhang, K. Sinha, W. B. Wang, J. Wang et al., Phase separation in LuFeO3 films, Appl Phys Lett 108, 202903 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    S. Cao, T. R. Paudel, K. Sinha, X. Jiang, W. Wang et al., The stability and surface termination of hexagonal LuFeO3, J Phys Condens Matter 27, 175004 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    Xu and W

    X. Xu and W. Wang, Multiferroic hexagonal ferrites (h-RFeO 3, R=Y ,Dy-Lu): a brief experimental review, Modern Physics Letters B 28, 1430008 (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    F. L. Liu, Y . Q. Hao, J. Y . Ni, Y . S. Zhao, D. Z. Zhang et al., Pressure-induced charge orders and their postulated coupling to ma gnetism in hexagonal multiferroic LuFe 2O4, npj Quantum Mater. 8, 7 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    S. M. Disseler, J. A. Borchers, C. M. Brooks, J. A. Mundy, J. A. Moyer et al. , Magnetic structure and ordering of multiferroic hexagonal LuFeO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 217602 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    S. Cao, X. Zhang, T. R. Paudel, K. Sinha, X. Wang et al., On the structural origin of the single- ion magnetic anisotropy in LuFeO3, J Phys Condens Matter 28, 156001 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    F. L. Liu, C. S. Xu, S. D. Shen, N. N. Li, H. W. Guo et al., Pressure-induced large enhancement of Neel temperature and electric polarization in the hexagonal multiferroic Lu 0.5Sc0.5FeO3, Phys. Rev. B 100, 214408 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    H. Wang, I. V . Solovyev, W. Wang, X. Wang, P . J. Ryan et al., Structural and electronic origin of the magnetic structures in hexagonal LuFeO3, Phys. Rev. B 90, 014436 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    See Supplemental Material at (URL will be inserted by publisher) for more information on the fabrication, structural characterization, and ferroelectric or magnetic measurement methods of thin films

  37. [37]

    S. Deng, J. Li, D. R. Smabraten, S. Shen, W. Wang et al., Critical Role of Sc Substitution in Modulating Ferroelectricity in Multiferroic LuFeO 3, Nano Lett 21, 6648 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    S. Deng, C. Xu, S. Cheng, W. Wang, J. Zhu et al. , Self‐Assembled LuFeO 3/LuFe2O4 Heterostructure with Emergent Ferroic Orderings, Advanced Functional Materials 32, 2206050 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    J. Y . Jo, D. J. Kim, Y . S. Kim, S. B. Choe, T. K. Song et al., Polarization switching dynamics governed by the thermodynamic nucleation process in ultrathin ferroelectric films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 247602 (2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    D. J. Kim, J. Y . Jo, Y . S. Kim, Y . J. Chang, J. S. Lee et al., Polarization relaxation induced by a depolarization field in ultrathin ferroelectric capacitors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237602 (2005)

    2005

  41. [41]

    Shimizu, K

    S. Shimizu, K. S. Takahashi, T. Hatano, M. Kawasaki, Y . Tokura et al., Electrically tunable anomalous Hall effect in Pt thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 216803 (2013)

    2013

  42. [42]

    Lohmann, T

    M. Lohmann, T. Su, B. Niu, Y . Hou, M. Alghamdi et al. , Probing Magnetism in Insulating Cr 2Ge2Te6 by Induced Anomalous Hall Effect in Pt, Nano Lett 19, 2397 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Ambrose and C

    T. Ambrose and C. L. Chien, Finite-size scaling in thin antiferromagnetic CoO layers, Journal of Applied Physics 79, 5920 (1996). 9

    1996

  44. [44]

    J. Xu, H. R. Chen, C. Zhou, D. Shi, G. Chen et al. , Optical imaging of antiferromagnetic domains in ultrathin CoO(001) films, New J Phys 22, 083033 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Nakayama, M

    H. Nakayama, M. Althammer, Y . T. Chen, K. Uchida, Y . Kajiwara et al. , Spin Hall Magnetoresistance Induced by a Nonequilibrium Proximity Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 206601 (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    Y . N. Geng, N. Lee, Y . J. Choi, S. W. Cheong and W. D. Wu, Collective Magnetism at Multiferroic V ortex Domain Walls, Nano Lett 12, 6055 (2012)

    2012

  47. [47]

    Y . Geng, H. Das, A. L. Wysocki, X. Wang, S. W. Cheong et al. , Direct visualization of magnetoelectric domains, Nat. Mater. 13, 163 (2014)

    2014

  48. [48]

    K. Du, B. Gao, Y . Z. Wang, X. H. Xu, J. Kim et al., V ortex ferroelectric domains, large-loop weak ferromagnetic domains, and their decoupling in hexagonal (Lu, Sc)FeO 3, npj Quantum Mater. 3, 7, 33 (2018)

    2018

  49. [49]

    Giraldo, Q

    M. Giraldo, Q. N. Meier, A. Bortis, D. Nowak, N. A. Spaldin et al., Magnetoelectric coupling of domains, domain walls and vortices in a mult iferroic with independent magnetic and electric order, Nature Communications 12, 3093 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    H. Das, A. L. Wysocki, Y . Geng, W. Wu an d C. J. Fennie, Bulk magnetoelectricity in the hexagonal manganites and ferrites, Nat. Commun. 5, 2998 (2014)

    2014

  51. [51]

    Artyukhin, K

    S. Artyukhin, K. T. Delaney, N. A. Spaldin and M. Mostovoy, Landau theory of topological defects in multiferroic hexagonal manganites, Nat. Mater. 13, 42 (2014)

    2014

  52. [52]

    X. Li, Y . Yun, A. S. Thind, Y . W. Yin, Q. Li et al., Domain-wall magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroic hexagonal YbFeO3 films, Sci Rep 13, 9, 1755 (2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    A. Tao, Y . Jiang, S. Chen, Y . Zhang, Y . Cao et al. , Ferroelectric pola rization and magnetic structure at domain walls in a multiferroic film, Nature Communications 15, 6099 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    J. Y . Chauleau, T. Chirac, S. Fusil, V . Garcia, W. Akhtar et al., Electric and antiferromagnetic chiral textures at multiferroic domain walls, Nature Materials 19, 386 (2020)

    2020

  55. [55]

    Mostovoy, Multiferroics: different routes to magnetoelectric coupling, npj Spintronics 2, 18 (2024)

    M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: different routes to magnetoelectric coupling, npj Spintronics 2, 18 (2024). 10 Fig. 1. (a) HAADF-STEM image revealing the atomic-scale structure of the h-LuFeO3 thin film, where both the upward and downward polarization domains are observed. The left schematic illustrates the thin film structure, consisting of a 1.5-unit-cell-t...

    2024