pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03274 · v1 · pith:RZMJ2L4Gnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Valence Ionization Of Water Clusters Formed Inside Helium Nanodroplets

Subhendu De , Sivarama Krishnan , Niklas Sheel , Keshav Sishodia , Robert Richter , Marcel Mudrich , Florent Calvo , Ltaief Ben Ltaief This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords water clustershelium nanodropletsvalence ionizationfragmentation suppressionprotonated ionshemibonded conformerscoincidence spectroscopycryogenic clusters
0
0 comments X

The pith

Water clusters inside helium nanodroplets fragment less upon valence ionization than free clusters do.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines valence ionization of small water clusters embedded in helium nanodroplets using extreme ultraviolet light at 21.6 eV and coincidence detection of electrons and ions. It establishes that the droplet environment reduces fragmentation, yielding more intact protonated and unprotonated cluster ions than seen in free clusters. Quantum chemical calculations are used to show that the low temperature allows both proton-transferred and hemibonded cluster structures to coexist. A sympathetic reader would care because the work demonstrates how a cryogenic matrix can preserve cluster ions that would otherwise break apart, opening a route to study their intact forms.

Core claim

Valence ionization at 21.6 eV of water clusters inside helium nanodroplets produces both protonated (H2O)n-1H+ and unprotonated (H2O)n+ ions with markedly less fragmentation than free clusters ionized at 20.6 eV; Penning ionization electron-ion coincidence spectra confirm the stabilization of intact ions, while quantum chemical calculations indicate that proton-transferred and hemibonded conformers coexist under the cryogenic conditions inside the droplets.

What carries the argument

Penning ionization electron-ion coincidence spectroscopy that correlates emitted electrons with the resulting cluster ions, used together with quantum chemical calculations of cluster conformers.

Load-bearing premise

The observed protonated and unprotonated water cluster ions come from clusters formed inside the helium nanodroplets rather than from surface or gas-phase water.

What would settle it

If free water clusters ionized at exactly 21.6 eV produced the same degree of fragmentation suppression as the embedded clusters, the claim that the helium environment stabilizes the ions would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03274 by Florent Calvo, Keshav Sishodia, Ltaief Ben Ltaief, Marcel Mudrich, Niklas Sheel, Robert Richter, Sivarama Krishnan, Subhendu De.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panels b) and c) show droplet-correlated PIES’s recorded in coincidence with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The ionization mechanisms of small H$_2$O/D$_2$O clusters embedded in helium nanodroplets (HNDs) irradiated with extreme ultraviolet photons of energy $h\nu$ = 21.6 eV are investigated using Penning ionization electron-ion coincidence spectroscopy. Both protonated (H$_2$O)$_{n-1}$H$^{+}$/(D$_2$O)$_{n-1}$D$^{+}$ ($n$ = 3-6) and unprotonated (H$_2$O)$_{n}$$^{+}$/(D$_2$O)$_{n}$$^{+}$ ($n$ = 2-5) cluster ions were observed. Penning ionization electron spectra measured in coincidence with water cluster ions emitted from water clusters doped into both large and small HNDs are analyzed and compared with photoelectron-photoion coincidence spectra measured for free water clusters at $h\nu$ =20.6 eV. The results reveal suppression of fragmentation inside HNDs and stabilization of intact cluster ions. Quantum chemical calculations support the coexistence of proton-transferred and hemibonded conformers under the cryogenic conditions of helium nanodroplets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates valence ionization of small water (H2O/D2O) clusters embedded in helium nanodroplets using Penning ionization electron-ion coincidence spectroscopy at hν=21.6 eV. It reports observation of both protonated (H2O)n-1H+ and unprotonated (H2O)n+ cluster ions (n=2-6), analyzes Penning electron spectra in coincidence with cluster ions from large and small HNDs, and compares these to free-cluster PEPICO spectra at 20.6 eV. The central claim is suppression of fragmentation and stabilization of intact cluster ions inside HNDs, with quantum chemical calculations supporting coexistence of proton-transferred and hemibonded conformers under cryogenic conditions.

Significance. If the comparison can be made rigorous and quantitative measures supplied, the work would demonstrate a matrix-induced stabilization effect on ionized water clusters in a cryogenic helium environment. This would be of interest to chemical physics of solvation, radiation-induced processes in clusters, and potentially astrochemistry. The use of coincidence techniques to link electrons and ions is appropriate, and the inclusion of theory to address conformers is a positive step, though the current execution leaves the magnitude and attribution of the effect unclear.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'the results reveal suppression of fragmentation inside HNDs and stabilization of intact cluster ions' is presented without quantitative data (e.g., relative ion yields, branching ratios, or intensity ratios between HND and free-cluster spectra), error bars, or a description of how suppression was quantified. This absence makes the central claim difficult to evaluate.
  2. [Abstract and experimental comparison] Comparison to free clusters (Abstract and experimental sections): The key evidence for HND-induced suppression rests on contrasting Penning ionization spectra (21.6 eV, via He*) of embedded clusters against direct photoionization PEPICO spectra of free clusters at 20.6 eV. Because ionization mechanism and photon energy both differ, reduced fragmentation cannot be unambiguously attributed to the HND matrix rather than the Penning process or the 1 eV energy offset. The large-vs-small HND comparison addresses cluster origin but does not control for these variables, which is load-bearing for the main conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Quantum chemical calculations are mentioned without any details on the level of theory, basis sets, or validation procedures used to identify proton-transferred vs hemibonded conformers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve the presentation of quantitative results and to clarify the experimental comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'the results reveal suppression of fragmentation inside HNDs and stabilization of intact cluster ions' is presented without quantitative data (e.g., relative ion yields, branching ratios, or intensity ratios between HND and free-cluster spectra), error bars, or a description of how suppression was quantified. This absence makes the central claim difficult to evaluate.

    Authors: We agree that the central claim requires quantitative support to be properly evaluated. In the revised manuscript, we have added explicit relative ion yields, branching ratios between protonated and unprotonated species, and intensity ratios comparing HND-embedded versus free-cluster spectra. These are presented with estimated uncertainties derived from counting statistics and background subtraction. A new paragraph in the experimental section describes the quantification procedure, and the abstract has been updated to reference these measures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and experimental comparison] Comparison to free clusters (Abstract and experimental sections): The key evidence for HND-induced suppression rests on contrasting Penning ionization spectra (21.6 eV, via He*) of embedded clusters against direct photoionization PEPICO spectra of free clusters at 20.6 eV. Because ionization mechanism and photon energy both differ, reduced fragmentation cannot be unambiguously attributed to the HND matrix rather than the Penning process or the 1 eV energy offset. The large-vs-small HND comparison addresses cluster origin but does not control for these variables, which is load-bearing for the main conclusion.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the differing ionization mechanisms (Penning versus direct photoionization) and the 1 eV energy difference represent a limitation in unambiguously attributing the reduced fragmentation solely to the helium matrix. The large-versus-small HND comparison isolates the role of the droplet environment under identical Penning conditions, but does not fully control for the free-cluster benchmark. We have added a dedicated discussion paragraph citing literature on Penning ionization of water clusters, which indicates fragmentation patterns similar to direct ionization near 21 eV. We have also moderated the abstract and conclusion language from 'reveal suppression' to 'suggest a matrix-induced stabilization' and included explicit caveats about the comparison. A fully matched ionization-method control would require new experiments outside the present setup. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental comparison to independent external spectra

full rationale

The paper reports experimental Penning ionization coincidence spectra of water clusters embedded in HNDs at 21.6 eV, directly compared to separate PEPICO data on free clusters at 20.6 eV plus supporting quantum chemical calculations. No equations, fitted parameters, self-definitional constructs, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the central claim of suppressed fragmentation rests on external benchmark comparison rather than any reduction to the paper's own inputs by construction. This is the standard case of an experimental study whose validity can be assessed against independent measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental study; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract. Relies on standard assumptions of coincidence spectroscopy and quantum chemistry methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5768 in / 1049 out tokens · 16777 ms · 2026-06-28T08:14:05.969593+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Falcinelli, F

    S. Falcinelli, F. Pirani and F. Vecchiocattivi, Atmosphere, 2015, 6, 299--317

    2015

  2. [2]

    E. F. Van Dishoeck, E. Herbst and D. A. Neufeld, Chemical Reviews, 2013, 113, 9043--9085

    2013

  3. [3]

    Y. Gao, A. D. Skitnevskaya, E. Wang, H. Yuan, X. Ren, H. Lin, Z. Yan, S. Zhang, S. Gu, B. Yang et al., Physical Review X, 2025, 15, 011053

    2025

  4. [4]

    Johny, C

    M. Johny, C. A. Schouder, A. Al-Refaie, L. He, J. Wiese, H. Stapelfeldt, S. Trippel and J. K \"u pper, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2024, 26, 13118--13130

    2024

  5. [5]

    Dutuit, A

    O. Dutuit, A. Tabche-Fouhaile, I. Nenner, H. Frohlich and P. Guyon, The Journal of chemical physics, 1985, 83, 584--596

    1985

  6. [6]

    Banna, B

    M. Banna, B. McQuaide, R. Malutzki and V. Schmidt, The Journal of chemical physics, 1986, 84, 4739--4744

    1986

  7. [7]

    Truong, A

    S. Truong, A. Yencha, A. Juarez, S. Cavanagh, P. Bolognesi and G. King, Chemical Physics, 2009, 355, 183--193

    2009

  8. [8]

    A. Hans, A. Knie, P. Schmidt, L. Ben Ltaief, C. Ozga, P. Rei , H. Huckfeldt, M. F \"o rstel, U. Hergenhahn and A. Ehresmann, Physical Review A, 2015, 92, 032511

    2015

  9. [9]

    A. H. Roos, J. H. D. Eland, J. Andersson, R. J. Squibb and R. Feifel, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2018, 149, 204307

    2018

  10. [10]

    Mizuse, J.-L

    K. Mizuse, J.-L. Kuo and A. Fujii, Chemical Science, 2011, 2, 868--876

    2011

  11. [11]

    Tachikawa, J

    H. Tachikawa, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2004, 108, 7853--7862

    2004

  12. [12]

    Schnorr, M

    K. Schnorr, M. Belina, S. Augustin, H. Lindenblatt, Y. Liu, S. Meister, T. Pfeifer, G. Schmid, R. Treusch, F. Trost et al., Sci. Adv., 2023, 9, eadg7864

    2023

  13. [13]

    G. H. Gardenier, M. A. Johnson and A. B. McCoy, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2009, 113, 4772--4779

    2009

  14. [14]

    Shiromaru, H

    H. Shiromaru, H. Suzuki, H. Sato, S. Nagaoka and K. Kimura, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1989, 93, 1832--1835

    1989

  15. [15]

    Shinohara, N

    H. Shinohara, N. Nishi and N. Washida, The Journal of chemical physics, 1986, 84, 5561--5567

    1986

  16. [16]

    R. T. Jongma, Y. Huang, S. Shi and A. M. Wodtke, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 1998, 102, 8847--8854

    1998

  17. [17]

    Boatwright, C

    A. Boatwright, C. Feng, D. Spence, E. Latimer, C. Binns, A. M. Ellis and S. Yang, Faraday Discuss, 2013, 162, 113--124

    2013

  18. [18]

    J. P. Toennies, Molecules in Superfluid Helium Nanodroplets: Spectroscopy, Structure, and Dynamics, Springer International Publishing Cham, 2022, pp. 1--40

    2022

  19. [19]

    Yang and A

    S. Yang and A. M. Ellis, Chemical Society Reviews, 2013, 42, 472--484

    2013

  20. [20]

    S. De, A. R. Abid, J. D. Asmussen, L. Ben Ltaief, K. Sishodia, A. Ulmer, H. B. Pedersen, S. R. Krishnan and M. Mudrich, J. Chem. Phys., 2024, 160, 094308

    2024

  21. [21]

    Tiefenthaler, J

    L. Tiefenthaler, J. Ameixa, P. Martini, S. Albertini, L. Ballauf, M. Zankl, M. Goulart, F. Laimer, K. von Haeften, F. Zappa and P. Scheier, Review of Scientific Instruments, 2020, 91, 033315

    2020

  22. [22]

    Zunzunegui-Bru, E

    E. Zunzunegui-Bru, E. Gruber, T. L \'a zaro, M. Bartolomei, M. I. Hern \'a ndez, J. Campos-Mart \' nez, T. Gonz \'a lez-Lezana, S. Bergmeister, F. Zappa, P. Scheier et al., The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2023, 14, 3126--3131

    2023

  23. [23]

    Foitzik, M

    F. Foitzik, M. Bartolomei, J. Campos-Mart \' nez, F. Pirani, S. Bergmeister, L. Ganner, I. Stromberg, F. Zappa, M. Mahmoodi-Darian, T. Gonz \'a lez-Lezana et al., Small Structures, 2025, 6, 2500094

    2025

  24. [24]

    Foitzik, V

    F. Foitzik, V. Richardson, C. Maurice, G. Sch \"o pfer, M. On c \'a k and E. Gruber, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2026

    2026

  25. [25]

    Gupta, S

    R. Gupta, S. Singha, D. Mani et al., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2025, 27, 23865--23879

    2025

  26. [26]

    L. B. Ltaief, M. Shcherbinin, S. Mandal, S. R. Krishnan, R. Richter, T. Pfeifer and M. Mudrich, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 2020, 53, 204001

    2020

  27. [27]

    Do and N

    H. Do and N. A. Besley, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2013, 117, 5385--5391

    2013

  28. [28]

    J. D. Herr, J. Talbot and R. P. Steele, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2015, 119, 752--766

    2015

  29. [29]

    Busch and M

    M. Busch and M. Sotoudeh, J. Chem. Phys., 2023, 159, 034303

    2023

  30. [30]

    Iguchi, A

    A. Iguchi, A. Singh, S. Bergmeister, A. A. Azhagesan, K. Mizuse, A. Fujii, H. Tanuma, T. Azuma, P. Scheier, S. Kuma et al., The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2023, 14, 8199--8204

    2023

  31. [31]

    Kulig and N

    W. Kulig and N. Agmon, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2014, 118, 278--286

    2014

  32. [32]

    Prakash, K

    M. Prakash, K. Rudharachari Maiyelvaganan, N. G. Lakshman, M. Mogren Al-Mogren and M. Hochlaf, ChemPhysChem, 2023, 24, e202300267

    2023

  33. [33]

    D. Marx, M. E. Tuckerman, J. Hutter and M. Parrinello, Nature, 1999, 397, 601--604

    1999

  34. [34]

    Belau, K

    L. Belau, K. R. Wilson, S. R. Leone and M. Ahmed, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2007, 111, 10885--10886

    2007

  35. [35]

    Lengyel, A

    J. Lengyel, A. Pysanenko, V. Poterya, J. Ko c i s ek and M. F \'a rn \' k, Chemical Physics Letters, 2014, 612, 256--261

    2014

  36. [36]

    Hartweg, B

    S. Hartweg, B. L. Yoder, G. A. Garcia, L. Nahon and R. Signorell, Physical Review Letters, 2017, 118, 103402

    2017

  37. [37]

    X. Ren, K. Hossen, S. Jia, J. Zhou, X. Xue, T. Pfeifer and A. Dorn, Physical Review A, 2024, 110, 042801

    2024

  38. [38]

    U. Buck, C. C. Pradzynski, T. Zeuch, J. M. Dieterich and B. Hartke, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16, 6859--6871

    2014

  39. [39]

    T. E. Gartmann, S. Hartweg, L. Ban, E. Chasovskikh, B. L. Yoder and R. Signorell, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20, 16364--16371

    2018

  40. [40]

    Jahnke, H

    T. Jahnke, H. Sann, T. Havermeier, K. Kreidi, C. Stuck, M. Meckel, M. Sch \"o ffler, N. Neumann, R. Wallauer, S. Voss et al., Nature Physics, 2010, 6, 139--142

    2010

  41. [41]

    X. Ren, E. Wang, J. Zhou, S. Jia, X. Wang, X. Xue and A. Dorn, Physical Review A, 2023, 108, 052814

    2023

  42. [42]

    M. B. Arfa, G. Le Coz, G. Sinou, A. Le Nadan, F. Tuffin and C. Tannous, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 1994, 27, 2541

    1994

  43. [43]

    B. Haug, H. Morgner and V. Staemmler, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics, 1985, 18, 259

    1985

  44. [44]

    D. Yee, A. Hamnett and C. Brion, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 1976, 8, 291--312

    1976

  45. [45]

    B. G. Brunetti, P. Candori, S. Falcinelli, F. Pirani and F. Vecchiocattivi, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2013, 139, 164305

    2013

  46. [46]

    Brunetti, P

    B. Brunetti, P. Candori, D. Cappelletti, S. Falcinelli, F. Pirani, D. Stranges and F. Vecchiocattivi, Chemical Physics Letters, 2012, 539, 19--23

    2012

  47. [47]

    Buchta, S

    D. Buchta, S. R. Krishnan, N. B. Brauer, M. Drabbels, P. O’Keeffe, M. Devetta, M. Di Fraia, C. Callegari, R. Richter, M. Coreno et al., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2013, 117, 4394--4403

    2013

  48. [48]

    Bastian, J

    B. Bastian, J. D. Asmussen, L. Ben Ltaief, A. Czasch, N. C. Jones, S. V. Hoffmann, H. B. Pedersen and M. Mudrich, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2022, 93, 075110

    2022

  49. [49]

    Dick, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16, 570--580

    B. Dick, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16, 570--580

    2014

  50. [50]

    F \"o rstel, M

    M. F \"o rstel, M. Neustetter, S. Denifl, F. Lelievre and U. Hergenhahn, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2015, 86, 073103

    2015

  51. [51]

    Buchta, S

    D. Buchta, S. R. Krishnan, N. B. Brauer, M. Drabbels, P. O’Keeffe, M. Devetta, M. Di Fraia, C. Callegari, R. Richter, M. Coreno, K. C. Prince, F. Stienkemeier, J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer and M. Mudrich, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2013, 139, 084301

    2013

  52. [52]

    Mudrich, A

    M. Mudrich, A. LaForge, A. Ciavardini, P. O’Keeffe, C. Callegari, M. Coreno, A. Demidovich, M. Devetta, M. D. Fraia, M. Drabbels et al., Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 112

    2020

  53. [53]

    LaForge, J

    A. LaForge, J. D. Asmussen, B. Bastian, M. Bonanomi, C. Callegari, S. De, M. Di Fraia, L. Gorman, S. Hartweg, S. Krishnan et al., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2022, 24, 28844--28852

    2022

  54. [54]

    von Haeften, T

    K. von Haeften, T. Laarmann, H. Wabnitz, T. M \"o ller and K. Fink, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2011, 115, 7316--7326

    2011

  55. [55]

    Cederbaum, J

    L. Cederbaum, J. Zobeley and F. Tarantelli, Physical review letters, 1997, 79, 4778

    1997

  56. [56]

    o rner, U. Fr \

    T. Jahnke, U. Hergenhahn, B. Winter, R. D \"o rner, U. Fr \"u hling, P. V. Demekhin, K. Gokhberg, L. S. Cederbaum, A. Ehresmann, A. Knie et al., Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 11295--11369

    2020

  57. [57]

    Ben Ltaief, M

    L. Ben Ltaief, M. Shcherbinin, S. Mandal, S. Krishnan, A. LaForge, R. Richter, S. Turchini, N. Zema, T. Pfeifer, E. Fasshauer et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2019, 10, 6904--6909

    2019

  58. [58]

    LaForge, L

    A. LaForge, L. Ben Ltaief, S. Krishnan, N. Sisourat and M. Mudrich, Reports on Progress in Physics, 2024, 87, 126402

    2024

  59. [59]

    Ben Ltaief, K

    L. Ben Ltaief, K. Sishodia, R. Richter, B. Bastian, J. D. Asmussen, S. Mandal, N. Pal, C. Medina, S. R. Krishnan, K. von Haeften et al., Physical Review Research, 2024, 6, 013019

    2024

  60. [60]

    Shcherbinin, A

    M. Shcherbinin, A. LaForge, M. Hanif, R. Richter and M. Mudrich, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2018, 122, 1855--1860

    2018

  61. [61]

    J. D. Asmussen, A. R. Abid, A. Sundaralingam, B. Bastian, K. Sishodia, S. De, L. Ben Ltaief, S. Krishnan, H. B. Pedersen and M. Mudrich, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2023, 25, 24819--24828

    2023

  62. [62]

    S. Sen, S. Mandal, S. De, A. Sen, R. Gopal, L. B. Ltaief, S. Turchini, D. Catone, N. Zema, M. Coreno et al., Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 2024, 57, 015201

    2024

  63. [63]

    Mandal, R

    S. Mandal, R. Gopal, M. Shcherbinin, A. D’Elia, H. Srinivas, R. Richter, M. Coreno, B. Bapat, M. Mudrich, S. Krishnan et al., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2020, 22, 10149--10157

    2020

  64. [64]

    Sankari, M

    R. Sankari, M. Ehara, H. Nakatsuji, Y. Senba, K. Hosokawa, H. Yoshida, A. De Fanis, Y. Tamenori, S. Aksela and K. Ueda, Chemical physics letters, 2003, 380, 647--653

    2003

  65. [65]

    C. Ning, B. Hajgat \'o , Y. Huang, S. Zhang, K. Liu, Z. Luo, S. Knippenberg, J. Deng and M. Deleuze, Chemical Physics, 2008, 343, 19--30

    2008

  66. [66]

    Karlsson, L

    L. Karlsson, L. Mattsson, R. Jadrny, R. Albridge, S. Pinchas, T. Bergmark and K. Siegbahn, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1975, 62, 4745--4752

    1975

  67. [67]

    C. C. Wang, O. Kornilov, O. Gessner, J. H. Kim, D. S. Peterka and D. M. Neumark, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2008, 112, 9356--9365

    2008

  68. [68]

    L. B. Ltaief, M. Shcherbinin, S. Mandal, S. Krishnan, R. Richter, S. Turchini, N. Zema and M. Mudrich, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 2021, 202, 444--455

    2021

  69. [69]

    Loginov, D

    E. Loginov, D. Rossi and M. Drabbels, Physical review letters, 2005, 95, 163401

    2005

  70. [70]

    Hartweg, PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2019

    S. Hartweg, PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2019

    2019

  71. [71]

    Smolarek, N

    S. Smolarek, N. B. Brauer, W. J. Buma and M. Drabbels, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132, 14086--14091

    2010

  72. [72]

    D. M. Chipman, The Journal of chemical physics, 2005, 122, 044111

    2005

  73. [73]

    Trajmar, W

    S. Trajmar, W. Williams and A. Kuppermann, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1973, 58, 2521--2531

    1973

  74. [74]

    Chutjian, R

    A. Chutjian, R. Hall and S. Trajmar, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1975, 63, 892--898

    1975

  75. [75]

    Khakoo, C

    M. Khakoo, C. Winstead and V. McKoy, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2009, 79, 052711

    2009

  76. [76]

    Seng and F

    G. Seng and F. Linder, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics, 1976, 9, 2539--2551

    1976

  77. [77]

    J. P. Toennies and A. F. Vilesov, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 43, 2622--2648

    2004

  78. [78]

    J. K. Christensen, C. E. Petersen, S. H. Albrechtsen, J. Goudot, F. Calvo and H. Stapelfeldt, Nature Communications, 2025

    2025

  79. [79]

    Kamarchik, O

    E. Kamarchik, O. Kostko, J. M. Bowman, M. Ahmed and A. I. Krylov, J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132, 194311

    2010

  80. [80]

    Shiromaru, H

    H. Shiromaru, H. Shinohara, N. Washida, H.-S. Yoo and K. Kimura, Chemical physics letters, 1987, 141, 7--11

    1987

Showing first 80 references.