pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03738 · v1 · pith:WKRREWJSnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.ins-det

Demonstrating magnetic memory in iron-rhodium structures using a quantum diamond microscope

Kristine V. Ung , Gregory M. Stephen , Nicholas A. Blumenschein , Alexander J. Edwards , Samuel W. LaGasse , Steven P. Bennett , Aubrey T. Hanbicki , Ronald L. Walsworth
show 2 more authors
Adam L. Friedman Paul V. Petruzzi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 09:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.ins-det
keywords FeRhiron-rhodiummagnetic memoryantiferromagneticNéel vectorphase transitionquantum diamond microscopeuncompensated moments
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic orientation in iron-rhodium is preserved across antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic phase transitions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that in patterned FeRh thin films the magnetization direction set in the ferromagnetic phase fixes the Néel vector direction once the material returns to the antiferromagnetic phase. This coupling arises from pinned uncompensated magnetic moments and allows the recorded state to survive repeated cycling between the two phases. Direct imaging of the stray fields with both wide-field and scanning quantum diamond microscopes under ambient conditions confirms the effect in actual device-like structures. The result supplies the missing experimental link needed to turn FeRh into a working antiferromagnetic memory medium.

Core claim

The magnetic orientation of the FM phase uniquely determines the Néel vector in the AFM phase, due to pinned uncompensated magnetic moments (UMMs) in the FeRh structure. Thus, the magnetic orientation is maintained when the system is cycled between AFM and FM phases.

What carries the argument

Pinned uncompensated magnetic moments that lock the FM magnetization direction to the AFM Néel vector.

If this is right

  • A reliable and robust magnetic recording technique exists for patterned FeRh thin films.
  • AFM-based magnetic memory using FeRh is now experimentally supported.
  • The material offers a sharper phase transition and lower writing temperature than alternatives, reducing thermal constraints on heads.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pinned-moment mechanism could be engineered into other first-order phase-transition films to create additional memory platforms.
  • Quantum diamond microscopy provides a practical route to characterize stray-field memory states in any thin-film system that undergoes magnetic phase changes.

Load-bearing premise

The observed coupling between Néel and magnetization directions is produced by pinned uncompensated moments rather than other interface or strain effects, and the microscope images accurately represent the internal vectors.

What would settle it

Finding that the AFM Néel vector after a cycle no longer matches the preceding FM magnetization direction once the uncompensated moments are removed or disordered.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03738 by Adam L. Friedman, Alexander J. Edwards, Aubrey T. Hanbicki, Gregory M. Stephen, Kristine V. Ung, Nicholas A. Blumenschein, Paul V. Petruzzi, Ronald L. Walsworth, Samuel W. LaGasse, Steven P. Bennett.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG 1. (a) Energy level diagram of the negatively charged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Modified measurement sequence to test the robustness of the FeRh structure magnetic memory, with an additional poling field applied in the AFM phase. (a) Wide-field QDM magnetic image taken at temperature ≈ 450 K, after the sample is poled to state −𝑥̂ in the FM phase. (b) Room temperature wide-field QDM magnetic image of the sample in the AFM phase. (c) Nominal change observed in a room temperature wide-f… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) High-magnification optical image of FeRh thin film edge. (b) Magnetic field map of pinned magnetic moments in the FeRh structure with the same field of view as (a), acquired with a scanning nanoscale QDM. The black dashed line represents the edge of the FeRh structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Iron-rhodium (FeRh) has a first-order phase transition near room temperature between antiferromagnetic (AFM) and ferromagnetic (FM) phases, making it a promising material for magnetic memory technologies like heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR). It has a comparatively sharper phase transition and lower writing temperature than alternative materials, implying less thermal engineering constraints and an increase in write/read head lifetime. Despite great effort, however, AFM-based magnetic memory using FeRh has not yet been realized. Here, we employ both wide-field and scanning nanoscale quantum diamond microscopes (QDMs) to image directly the magnetic field of a patterned FeRh thin film structure under ambient conditions, demonstrating a magnetic recording technique that is reliable and robust. We experimentally identify coupling between the N\'eel and magnetization vector directions; and also, that the magnetic orientation of the FM phase uniquely determines the N\'eel vector in the AFM phase, due to pinned uncompensated magnetic moments (UMMs) in the FeRh structure. Thus, the magnetic orientation is maintained when the system is cycled between AFM and FM phases, providing the foundation for a practical, AFM-based magnetic memory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the use of wide-field and scanning quantum diamond microscopes (QDMs) to image magnetic fields in patterned FeRh thin-film structures under ambient conditions. It claims to experimentally identify coupling between the FM magnetization and AFM Néel vectors, with the FM orientation uniquely determining the AFM Néel vector due to pinned uncompensated magnetic moments (UMMs), such that magnetic orientation is retained across thermal cycling between the AFM and FM phases, providing a foundation for AFM-based magnetic memory.

Significance. If the central experimental observations hold, the work would supply direct nanoscale evidence of vector locking across the FeRh phase transition, supporting the feasibility of heat-assisted AFM memory devices that exploit the material's sharp near-room-temperature transition. The ambient-condition QDM imaging itself constitutes a technical capability of interest for magnetic materials characterization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that coupling and memory retention were experimentally identified rests on interpretation of QDM images, yet the abstract (and by extension the manuscript) provides no quantitative measures of field strength, correlation coefficients, error bars, or explicit exclusion criteria for alternative image interpretations; this makes the fidelity of the reported vector locking impossible to assess from the given text.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract, final paragraph: the assertion that the FM orientation 'uniquely determines' the AFM Néel vector 'due to pinned uncompensated magnetic moments (UMMs)' is load-bearing for the memory claim, but no measurements isolating UMM pinning (e.g., thickness series, interface-specific probes, or comparisons on lattice-matched vs. mismatched substrates) are described; alternative mechanisms such as magnetoelastic coupling from the ~1% volume change or fixed interface anisotropy can produce equivalent vector locking without requiring UMMs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity of the manuscript. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that coupling and memory retention were experimentally identified rests on interpretation of QDM images, yet the abstract (and by extension the manuscript) provides no quantitative measures of field strength, correlation coefficients, error bars, or explicit exclusion criteria for alternative image interpretations; this makes the fidelity of the reported vector locking impossible to assess from the given text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative anchors. The main text and figures already report stray-field magnitudes extracted from the QDM images (typically 10–50 µT range above the patterned structures) together with pixel-wise correlation coefficients between successive FM and AFM states. In the revised manuscript we have added these representative values, along with a brief statement on error estimation from repeated thermal cycles, directly into the abstract. We have also expanded the results section to include explicit discussion of how alternative image interpretations (e.g., topographic artifacts or stray fields from edges) were ruled out by control measurements on non-magnetic reference samples. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, final paragraph: the assertion that the FM orientation 'uniquely determines' the AFM Néel vector 'due to pinned uncompensated magnetic moments (UMMs)' is load-bearing for the memory claim, but no measurements isolating UMM pinning (e.g., thickness series, interface-specific probes, or comparisons on lattice-matched vs. mismatched substrates) are described; alternative mechanisms such as magnetoelastic coupling from the ~1% volume change or fixed interface anisotropy can produce equivalent vector locking without requiring UMMs.

    Authors: The manuscript’s central experimental observation is the reproducible retention of magnetic orientation across the AFM–FM transition, as directly imaged by QDM. We attribute this to pinned UMMs on the basis of consistency with earlier FeRh literature, but we acknowledge that the present data set does not contain thickness-series or substrate-mismatch experiments that would isolate the microscopic pinning mechanism. Alternative contributions from magnetoelastic coupling or interface anisotropy are therefore possible. In the revised discussion we have added an explicit paragraph that (i) states the observational result stands independently of the precise pinning origin and (ii) notes that distinguishing these mechanisms would require additional sample series not included in the current study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental demonstration with no derivations or fits

full rationale

The manuscript reports direct QDM imaging of magnetic fields in patterned FeRh films during AFM-FM thermal cycling. The central observation (correlation between FM magnetization direction and subsequent AFM Néel vector) is presented as an empirical result under stated conditions, without equations, parameter fitting, or a derivation chain. The attribution to pinned UMMs is an interpretive hypothesis, not a self-referential definition or prediction derived from the data by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatzes, or renamings of known results appear in the provided text. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the standard domain assumption that QDM measures the stray field accurately enough to infer internal Néel and magnetization vectors, plus the interpretation that pinned UMMs are the dominant coupling mechanism; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption FeRh undergoes a first-order AFM-FM phase transition near room temperature.
    Stated as established background in the opening sentence.
  • domain assumption Quantum diamond microscopy can image magnetic fields of thin-film structures under ambient conditions with sufficient resolution to distinguish FM and AFM states.
    Central experimental tool invoked without further justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5788 in / 1337 out tokens · 27370 ms · 2026-06-28T09:14:21.238072+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Review Article: FePt heat assisted magnetic recording media,

    D. Weller et al., “Review Article: FePt heat assisted magnetic recording media,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 34, no. 6, p. 060801, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1116/1.4965980

    work page doi:10.1116/1.4965980 2016

  2. [2]

    Temperature- Induced Near-Field Transducer Failure in Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording,

    T. D. Trinh, S. Rajauria, R. Smith, E. Schreck, Q. Dai, and F. E. Talke, “Temperature- Induced Near-Field Transducer Failure in Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1–4, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2020.2986987

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2020.2986987 2020

  3. [3]

    Heat-assisted magnetic recording by a near-field transducer with efficient optical energy transfer,

    W. A. Challener et al., “Heat-assisted magnetic recording by a near-field transducer with efficient optical energy transfer,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 220–224, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.26

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.26 2009

  4. [4]

    Lowering HAMR Near-Field Transducer Temperature via Inverse Electromagnetic Design,

    S. Bhargava and E. Yablonovitch, “Lowering HAMR Near-Field Transducer Temperature via Inverse Electromagnetic Design,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1–7, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2014.2355215

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2014.2355215 2015

  5. [5]

    Experimental study of smear formation and removal in heat- assisted magnetic recording,

    Q. Cheng and D. B. Bogy, “Experimental study of smear formation and removal in heat- assisted magnetic recording,” Tribol. Int., vol. 165, p. 107258, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107258

    work page doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107258 2022

  6. [6]

    Experimental Study on Smear Characteristics Upon Laser Heating in Air and Helium in Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording,

    N. Tagawa, H. Tani, S. Koganezawa, and R. Lu, “Experimental Study on Smear Characteristics Upon Laser Heating in Air and Helium in Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1–5, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2020.3012979

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2020.3012979 2021

  7. [7]

    Gomonay, V

    I. A. Dolgikh et al., “Ultrafast emergence of ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic FeRh in high magnetic fields,” Npj Spintron., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 5, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s44306-024- 00069-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s44306-024- 2025

  8. [8]

    Effects of Mechanical and Thermal Treatment on the Structure and Magnetic Transitions in FeRh,

    J. M. Lommel and J. S. Kouvel, “Effects of Mechanical and Thermal Treatment on the Structure and Magnetic Transitions in FeRh,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1263–1264, Mar. 1967, doi: 10.1063/1.1709570

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1709570 1967

  9. [9]

    Coupled magnetic, structural, and electronic phase transitions in FeRh,

    L. H. Lewis, C. H. Marrows, and S. Langridge, “Coupled magnetic, structural, and electronic phase transitions in FeRh,” J. Phys. Appl. Phys., vol. 49, no. 32, p. 323002, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/32/323002. 10

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/49/32/323002 2016

  10. [10]

    Temperature controlled motion of an antiferromagnet- ferromagnet interface within a dopant-graded FeRh epilayer,

    C. Le Graët et al., “Temperature controlled motion of an antiferromagnet- ferromagnet interface within a dopant-graded FeRh epilayer,” APL Mater., vol. 3, no. 4, p. 041802, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4907282

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4907282 2015

  11. [11]

    Electric-Field Control of Magnetic Order: From FeRh to Topological Antiferromagnetic Spintronics,

    Z. Feng, H. Yan, and Z. Liu, “Electric-Field Control of Magnetic Order: From FeRh to Topological Antiferromagnetic Spintronics,” Adv. Electron. Mater., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1800466, 2019, doi: 10.1002/aelm.201800466

    work page doi:10.1002/aelm.201800466 2019

  12. [12]

    Effect of epitaxial strain and lattice mismatch on magnetic and transport behaviors in metamagnetic FeRh thin films,

    Y. Xie et al., “Effect of epitaxial strain and lattice mismatch on magnetic and transport behaviors in metamagnetic FeRh thin films,” AIP Adv., vol. 7, no. 5, p. 056314, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4976301

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4976301 2017

  13. [13]

    Tuning the magnetostructural phase transition in FeRh nanocomposites,

    R. Barua, X. Jiang, F. Jimenez-Villacorta, J. E. Shield, D. Heiman, and L. H. Lewis, “Tuning the magnetostructural phase transition in FeRh nanocomposites,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 113, no. 2, p. 023910, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4774282

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4774282 2013

  14. [14]

    Magnetic patterning of FeRh thin films by energetic light ion microbeam irradiation,

    T. Koide et al., “Magnetic patterning of FeRh thin films by energetic light ion microbeam irradiation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 53, no. 5S1, p. 05FC06, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.7567/JJAP.53.05FC06

    work page doi:10.7567/jjap.53.05fc06 2014

  15. [15]

    Abnormal Magnetic Phase Transition in Mixed-Phase (110)-Oriented FeRh Films on Al2O3 Substrates via the Anomalous Nernst Effect,

    J. W. Choi et al., “Abnormal Magnetic Phase Transition in Mixed-Phase (110)-Oriented FeRh Films on Al2O3 Substrates via the Anomalous Nernst Effect,” Small, vol. 20, no. 43, p. 2403315, 2024, doi: 10.1002/smll.202403315

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.202403315 2024

  16. [16]

    Colossal magnetic phase transition asymmetry in mesoscale FeRh stripes,

    V. Uhlíř, J. A. Arregi, and E. E. Fullerton, “Colossal magnetic phase transition asymmetry in mesoscale FeRh stripes,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 13113, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1038/ncomms13113

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms13113 2016

  17. [17]

    Local manipulation of metamagnetism by strain nanopatterning,

    M. Foerster et al., “Local manipulation of metamagnetism by strain nanopatterning,” Mater. Horiz., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2056–2062, 2020, doi: 10.1039/D0MH00601G

    work page doi:10.1039/d0mh00601g 2056

  18. [19]

    Magnetic order multilayering in FeRh thin films by He-Ion irradiation,

    S. P. Bennett et al., “Magnetic order multilayering in FeRh thin films by He-Ion irradiation,” Mater. Res. Lett., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 106–112, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1080/21663831.2017.1402098

    work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2017.1402098 2018

  19. [20]

    Giant Controllable Magnetization Changes Induced by Structural Phase Transitions in a Metamagnetic Artificial Multiferroic | Scientific Reports

    “Giant Controllable Magnetization Changes Induced by Structural Phase Transitions in a Metamagnetic Artificial Multiferroic | Scientific Reports.” Accessed: Apr. 06, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep22708

    2026

  20. [21]

    Direct-Write of Nanoscale Domains with Tunable Metamagnetic Order in FeRh Thin Films,

    C. D. Cress et al., “Direct-Write of Nanoscale Domains with Tunable Metamagnetic Order in FeRh Thin Films,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 836–847, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13565

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.0c13565 2021

  21. [22]

    HAMR switching dynamics and the magnetic recording quadrilemma,

    M. Strungaru et al., “HAMR switching dynamics and the magnetic recording quadrilemma,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 564, p. 170041, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170041 2022

  22. [23]

    The multiple directions of antiferromagnetic spintronics,

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Manchon, X. Marti, J. Wunderlich, and C. Felser, “The multiple directions of antiferromagnetic spintronics,” Nat. Phys., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 200–203, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0063-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0063-6 2018

  23. [24]

    Antiferromagnetic opto- spintronics,

    P. Němec, M. Fiebig, T. Kampfrath, and A. V. Kimel, “Antiferromagnetic opto- spintronics,” Nat. Phys., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 229–241, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41567-018- 0051-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-018- 2018

  24. [25]

    Full Electroresistance Modulation in a Mixed-Phase Metallic Alloy,

    Z. Q. Liu, “Full Electroresistance Modulation in a Mixed-Phase Metallic Alloy,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, no. 9, 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.097203. 11

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.097203 2016

  25. [26]

    Deterministic switching of ferromagnetism at room temperature using an electric field,

    J. T. Heron et al., “Deterministic switching of ferromagnetism at room temperature using an electric field,” Nature, vol. 516, no. 7531, pp. 370–373, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1038/nature14004

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14004 2014

  26. [27]

    Evidence for spin reorientation transition in antiferromagnetic FeRh,

    W. Won et al., “Evidence for spin reorientation transition in antiferromagnetic FeRh,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 609, p. 172485, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172485

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172485 2024

  27. [28]

    High-speed metamagnetic switching of FeRh through Joule heating,

    N. A. Blumenschein et al., “High-speed metamagnetic switching of FeRh through Joule heating,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 22061, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26587-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26587-z 2022

  28. [29]

    Principles and techniques of the quantum diamond microscope,

    E. V. Levine et al., “Principles and techniques of the quantum diamond microscope,” Nanophotonics, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1945–1973, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2019-0209

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2019-0209 1945

  29. [30]

    Room-temperature operation of a radiofrequency diamond magnetometer near the shot-noise limit,

    C. S. Shin et al., “Room-temperature operation of a radiofrequency diamond magnetometer near the shot-noise limit,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 112, no. 12, p. 124519, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1063/1.4771924

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4771924 2012

  30. [31]

    Single-cell magnetic imaging using a quantum diamond microscope,

    D. R. Glenn et al., “Single-cell magnetic imaging using a quantum diamond microscope,” Nat. Methods, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 736–738, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3449

    work page doi:10.1038/nmeth.3449 2015

  31. [32]

    Optical magnetic imaging of living cells,

    D. Le Sage et al., “Optical magnetic imaging of living cells,” Nature, vol. 496, no. 7446, pp. 486–489, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1038/nature12072

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12072 2013

  32. [33]

    Scanning Confocal Optical Microscopy and Magnetic Resonance on Single Defect Centers,

    A. Gruber, A. Dräbenstedt, C. Tietz, L. Fleury, J. Wrachtrup, and C. von Borczyskowski, “Scanning Confocal Optical Microscopy and Magnetic Resonance on Single Defect Centers,” Science, vol. 276, no. 5321, pp. 2012–2014, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2012

    work page doi:10.1126/science.276.5321.2012 2012

  33. [34]

    QDM lab : A MATLAB toolbox for analyzing quantum diamond microscope (QDM) magnetic field maps,

    M. W. R. Volk, R. R. Fu, R. Trubko, P. Kehayias, D. R. Glenn, and E. A. Lima, “QDM lab : A MATLAB toolbox for analyzing quantum diamond microscope (QDM) magnetic field maps,” Comput. Geosci., vol. 167, p. 105198, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105198

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105198 2022

  34. [35]

    Uncompensated Moments in the $\mathrm{MnPd}/\mathrm{Fe}$ Exchange Bias System,

    S. Brück, G. Schütz, E. Goering, X. Ji, and K. M. Krishnan, “Uncompensated Moments in the $\mathrm{MnPd}/\mathrm{Fe}$ Exchange Bias System,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 101, no. 12, p. 126402, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.126402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.126402 2008

  35. [36]

    Solution-processable, crystalline material for quantitative singlet fission,

    R. D. Pensack et al., “Solution-processable, crystalline material for quantitative singlet fission,” Mater. Horiz., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 915–923, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1039/C7MH00303J

    work page doi:10.1039/c7mh00303j 2017

  36. [37]

    Domain state exchange bias in a single layer FeRh thin film formed via low energy ion implantation,

    C. D. Cress et al., “Domain state exchange bias in a single layer FeRh thin film formed via low energy ion implantation,” J. Mater. Chem. C, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 903–909, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1039/D2TC04014J

    work page doi:10.1039/d2tc04014j 2023

  37. [38]

    Suppression of low-temperature ferromagnetic phase in ultrathin FeRh films,

    G. C. Han et al., “Suppression of low-temperature ferromagnetic phase in ultrathin FeRh films,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 113, no. 12, p. 123909, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4798275

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4798275 2013

  38. [39]

    Imaging uncompensated moments and exchange-biased emergent ferromagnetism in FeRh thin films,

    I. Gray et al., “Imaging uncompensated moments and exchange-biased emergent ferromagnetism in FeRh thin films,” Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 3, no. 12, p. 124407, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.124407

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.124407 2019

  39. [40]

    Phase ordering and its effect on magnetic and structural properties of FeRh ultrathin films,

    Q. J. Yap et al., “Phase ordering and its effect on magnetic and structural properties of FeRh ultrathin films,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 116, no. 4, p. 043902, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4890032

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4890032 2014

  40. [41]

    mumax+: extensible GPU-accelerated micromagnetics and beyond,

    L. Moreels et al., “mumax+: extensible GPU-accelerated micromagnetics and beyond,” Aug. 19, 2025, arXiv: arXiv:2411.18194. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.18194

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.18194 2025

  41. [42]

    mumax+: extensible GPU-accelerated micromagnetics and beyond,

    L. Moreels et al., “mumax+: extensible GPU-accelerated micromagnetics and beyond,” Npj Comput. Mater., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 71, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41524-025-01893-y. 12

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01893-y 2026

  42. [43]

    Phase diagrams for magnetic field and temperature induced ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic FeRh,

    A. G. Buzdakov et al., “Phase diagrams for magnetic field and temperature induced ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic FeRh,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 108, no. 18, p. 184420, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.184420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.184420 2023