pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03850 · v1 · pith:75FOTTA2new · submitted 2026-06-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.EP

A Previously Underexplored Regime in TESS: Minute-Scale Eclipses Reveal Ten White Dwarf-Cool M-Dwarf Binaries

Tristan Cavalier , Julien de Wit , Mathilde Timmermans , Benjamin V. Rackham , Mariangel Albornoz , Artem Y. Burdanov , Khalid Barkaoui , Amaury H. M. J. Triaud
show 9 more authors
Adam J. Burgasser Brice-Olivier Demory Elsa Ducrot Michael Gillon Yilen G\'omez Maqueo Chew Matthew J. Hooton Peter P. Pedersen Didier Queloz Sebasti\'an Z\'u\~niga-Fern\'andez
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP
keywords white dwarf binarieseclipsing binariesM-dwarf companionsTESS photometrypost-common-envelope evolutionshort-period binariesGaia white dwarfsminute-scale eclipses
0
0 comments X

The pith

A targeted search of TESS data uncovers ten new eclipsing white dwarf plus cool M-dwarf binaries missed by standard pipelines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes a search through TESS high-cadence light curves of Gaia-selected white dwarfs that targets brief eclipses lasting only minutes. Ten new systems are found and confirmed in which a cool M-dwarf companion fully eclipses the white dwarf on orbits of just a few hours. Standard transit-finding algorithms overlook these signals because they are short, repeat frequently, and are often diluted by light from the white dwarf. Multi-band follow-up photometry verifies that the eclipses occur on the target stars and uses wavelength-dependent dilution to show the companions are stars rather than brown dwarfs. The work presents a method that can be scaled to the full Gaia white-dwarf catalog to assemble a much larger sample for studying how binaries evolve after the common-envelope phase.

Core claim

A pilot search of roughly 37,000 Gaia white-dwarf candidates in TESS data identifies ten new fully eclipsing short-period white-dwarf plus cool M-dwarf binaries with orbital periods of a few hours and companion effective temperatures of 2700-3400 K. SPECULOOS multi-band photometry confirms the eclipses occur on the targets and distinguishes stellar from substellar companions through chromatic dilution. When combined with Bayesian spectral-energy-distribution modeling, the photometry yields self-consistent parameters for both components. These ten systems increase the TESS-discovered sample of such binaries by an order of magnitude and double the number known in the temperature regimes of M4

What carries the argument

Tailored search for minute-scale eclipses in TESS high-cadence photometry of white-dwarf candidates, followed by multi-band photometry that measures chromatic eclipse dilution to confirm the events occur on the target and establish companion type.

If this is right

  • The TESS-discovered sample of eclipsing white-dwarf plus M-dwarf binaries increases from one to eleven systems.
  • The number of known systems with M4 and M7 companions roughly doubles.
  • The custom search method provides a scalable framework that can be applied to the full Gaia catalog of about 1.3 million white-dwarf candidates.
  • A larger population assembled this way would allow statistical constraints on post-common-envelope orbital shrinkage and the survival of low-mass companions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The detection approach could be adapted to other wide-field time-domain surveys to locate similar populations of compact binaries that current pipelines miss.
  • A statistically large sample would enable direct comparison of observed orbital-period distributions against theoretical predictions for common-envelope ejection efficiency.
  • Precise eclipse modeling of these systems could yield independent measurements of white-dwarf radii that test cooling models at different temperatures.

Load-bearing premise

The minute-scale signals detected in TESS data are genuine eclipses of the target white dwarfs by bound cool M-dwarf companions rather than background variables or instrumental artifacts.

What would settle it

High-resolution spectroscopy of any of the ten white dwarfs that fails to detect radial-velocity variations with the same period as the photometric eclipses would disprove the bound-binary interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03850 by Adam J. Burgasser, Amaury H. M. J. Triaud, Artem Y. Burdanov, Benjamin V. Rackham, Brice-Olivier Demory, Didier Queloz, Elsa Ducrot, Julien de Wit, Khalid Barkaoui, Mariangel Albornoz, Mathilde Timmermans, Matthew J. Hooton, Michael Gillon, Peter P. Pedersen, Sebasti\'an Z\'u\~niga-Fern\'andez, Tristan Cavalier, Yilen G\'omez Maqueo Chew.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pipeline overview from the original sample of WD candidates to the newly-identified WD systems. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Detection example for narrow and frequent transit signals in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pixel-level vetting of TIC450781262 in TESS Sector 99. Left: median 15×15 Target Pixel File (TPF) cutout showing the WD target (white marker) and nearby Gaia DR3 sources (red markers). Middle: pixel-by-pixel signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) map of the transit-like signal, computed from phase-folded light curves, with the highest-SNR pixel highlighted. Right: grid of phase-folded and binned light curves for all … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SPECULOOS’ follow-up observations of TIC 450781262. Follow-up observations of TIC 450781262 obtained with the SPECULOOS Northern Observatory (SNO) with the telescope Artemis in the I+z (orange), i’ (green), and Exo (blue) filters confirms that the transit sig￾nals detected in TESS are on-target, while the transit dura￾tion (corresponding to a Jupiter size object) and the transit￾depth chromaticity (corresp… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) of TIC 450781262. An analysis of the TIC 450781262’s SED best explains the flux excess beyond 1 microns as originating from a ∼ 3,000 K cool-M companion. 5. RESULTS The SED and transit-dilution analyses independently provide first-order constraints on the system compo￾nents, but they probe complementary observables that depend on the same underlying physical parameters. T… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: New TESS discoveries in the near￾hydrogen-burning-limit WD+M population. Known eclipsing WD+M systems are shown as a function of orbital period and white dwarf temperature, with companion tem￾perature encoded by color. The single prior TESS-based discovery (TIC 60040774, Priyatikanto et al. 2022) is shown as a square, while systems from other facilities are shown as circles. The ten new TESS discoveries pr… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sensitivity of 1-m class telescopes to tran [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Short-period white-dwarf (WD) binaries are post-common-envelope systems that constrain orbital shrinkage, envelope evolution, and the survival of low-mass companions. We report the discovery and confirmation of ten fully eclipsing short-period WD + cool M-dwarf binaries identified through a tailored search for minute-scale eclipses in Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) high-cadence data and validated with SPECULOOS multi-band photometry. The systems have orbital periods of a few hours and companions with effective temperatures of 2700-3400 K. These discoveries demonstrate that TESS contains a previously underexplored population of compact WD binaries whose short-duration, high-frequency, and often diluted eclipse signals are not efficiently recovered by standard transit-search pipelines. Whereas the literature contained only one eclipsing WD+M binary reported as a TESS-based discovery, our pilot search of $\sim3.7\times10^4$ Gaia-selected WDs yields ten new confirmed systems, increasing the TESS-discovered sample by an order of magnitude. SPECULOOS follow-up confirms the eclipses occur on target and uses chromatic eclipse dilution to distinguish stellar from substellar companions. We combine multi-band eclipse photometry with Bayesian spectral energy distribution modeling to derive self-consistent WD and companion parameters. The resulting systems expand the known population of fully eclipsing WD+M binaries and notably double the number of systems in temperature regimes corresponding to M4 and M7 companions. This work establishes a scalable framework for identifying compact WD binaries in time-domain photometric surveys. Applied to TESS archival data across the full Gaia WD-candidate catalog ($\sim1.3\times10^6$ sources), this approach opens the prospect of assembling a population large enough to constrain post-common-envelope evolution and the stellar-substellar transition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of ten new fully eclipsing short-period white dwarf + cool M-dwarf binaries found via a targeted search for minute-scale eclipses in TESS high-cadence photometry of ~3.7e4 Gaia-selected white dwarfs. The systems are validated as on-target using SPECULOOS multi-band photometry (with chromatic dilution to distinguish stellar vs. substellar companions) and Bayesian SED modeling, yielding orbital periods of a few hours and companion Teff of 2700-3400 K. This increases the TESS-discovered sample by an order of magnitude and doubles the known systems in the M4/M7 temperature regimes.

Significance. If the ten systems are robustly confirmed as genuine WD+M eclipses, the result materially expands the known population of post-common-envelope binaries and demonstrates a scalable search technique applicable to the full ~1.3e6 Gaia WD catalog. The work leverages public TESS and Gaia data plus targeted follow-up, providing a concrete path to larger samples for constraining common-envelope evolution and the stellar-substellar transition.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and validation section] Abstract and validation section: The headline claim of ten confirmed new systems (and the order-of-magnitude increase in the TESS sample) rests on the assumption that all detected minute-scale signals are genuine on-target eclipses of the Gaia-selected WDs by cool companions. However, the SPECULOOS chromatic dilution analysis is presented without a quantified false-positive rate, completeness estimate, or simulation of sensitivity to background eclipsing variables, TESS pixel blending, or instrumental artifacts at minute cadence. This is load-bearing; even 2-3 misclassifications would materially weaken both the population increase and the reported doubling in M4/M7 regimes.
  2. [Results section] Results section (description of the ten systems): The Bayesian SED modeling inherits the classifications from the SPECULOOS analysis; without an explicit false-positive assessment or exclusion criteria for the initial TESS search (e.g., how many candidates were rejected and why), it is not possible to evaluate whether post-hoc selections affect the final count of ten.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the search was performed on ~3.7e4 Gaia-selected WDs but does not specify the exact selection criteria or magnitude limits applied to this pilot sample.
  2. Figure captions and text should explicitly state the TESS sector(s) and cadence used for each of the ten systems to allow reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The major comments correctly identify that the current manuscript lacks a quantified false-positive assessment for the TESS search and explicit details on candidate rejection criteria. We will revise the paper to address these points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and validation section] Abstract and validation section: The headline claim of ten confirmed new systems (and the order-of-magnitude increase in the TESS sample) rests on the assumption that all detected minute-scale signals are genuine on-target eclipses of the Gaia-selected WDs by cool companions. However, the SPECULOOS chromatic dilution analysis is presented without a quantified false-positive rate, completeness estimate, or simulation of sensitivity to background eclipsing variables, TESS pixel blending, or instrumental artifacts at minute cadence. This is load-bearing; even 2-3 misclassifications would materially weaken both the population increase and the reported doubling in M4/M7 regimes.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be strengthened by a quantified false-positive rate, completeness estimate, and simulations of background eclipsing variables, blending, and artifacts. The SPECULOOS multi-band photometry and chromatic dilution provide on-target confirmation and companion-type discrimination for the ten reported systems, but the initial TESS search description does not include end-to-end false-positive simulations. In revision we will add a new subsection with Monte Carlo simulations of these effects, an estimate of the false-positive probability for the final sample, and the number of candidates rejected at each stage of the TESS search pipeline. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] Results section (description of the ten systems): The Bayesian SED modeling inherits the classifications from the SPECULOOS analysis; without an explicit false-positive assessment or exclusion criteria for the initial TESS search (e.g., how many candidates were rejected and why), it is not possible to evaluate whether post-hoc selections affect the final count of ten.

    Authors: We will revise the results and methods sections to explicitly list the exclusion criteria applied to the TESS detections (e.g., signal-to-noise thresholds, eclipse shape requirements, and rejection of known artifacts) together with the number of candidates at each stage. This will demonstrate that the final sample of ten follows from the predefined validation steps rather than post-hoc adjustments. The Bayesian SED modeling section will reference these criteria for transparency. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational discovery report with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

This is a pure observational paper reporting a search in public TESS data for minute-scale eclipses around Gaia-selected white dwarfs, followed by SPECULOOS multi-band photometry for on-target confirmation and chromatic dilution analysis, plus standard Bayesian SED modeling for parameter estimation. No equations, uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or predictions are presented that reduce to the inputs by construction. The headline result (ten new systems) is a direct count of validated detections, not a derived quantity. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any central claim. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in photometric validation and SED fitting rather than new free parameters or invented entities; the abstract provides no explicit fitted constants beyond the reported temperature range.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions in stellar photometry and spectral energy distribution modeling hold for white dwarfs and M-dwarfs, including the applicability of model atmospheres and the interpretation of chromatic eclipse dilution.
    Invoked when combining multi-band eclipse photometry with Bayesian SED modeling to derive self-consistent parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5972 in / 1335 out tokens · 25029 ms · 2026-06-28T08:10:14.217826+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s

    Akeson, R., Armus, L., Bachelet, E., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05569 2019

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 , keywords =

    Baraffe, I., Homeier, D., Allard, F., & Chabrier, G. 2015, A&A, 577, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 B´ edard, A., Bergeron, P., Brassard, P., & Fontaine, G. 2020, ApJ, 901, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abafbe

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 2015

  3. [3]

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe , eprint =

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  4. [4]

    A., Schneider, F

    Bronner, V. A., Schneider, F. R. N., Podsiadlowski, P., & R¨ opke, F. K. 2024, A&A, 683, A65, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347397

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347397 2024

  5. [5]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =

    Buchner, J. 2021, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001, doi: 10.21105/joss.03001

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.03001 2021

  6. [6]

    Y., de Wit, J., Gillon, M., et al

    Burdanov, A. Y., de Wit, J., Gillon, M., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 105001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac92a6

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac92a6 2022

  7. [7]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.05560 2016

  8. [8]

    2024, A&A, 687, A256, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348870

    Chen, Z., Chen, Y., Chen, C., Ge, H., & Ma, B. 2024, A&A, 687, A256, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348870

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348870 2024

  9. [9]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/328. Originally published in: IPAC/Caltech (2013) de Wit, J., Alonso, R., Rackham, B. V., et al. 2025, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 9, 270, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ae1228

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ae1228 2021

  10. [10]

    2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Delrez, L., Gillon, M., Queloz, D., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10700, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VII, ed. H. K. Marshall & J. Spyromilio, 107001I, doi: 10.1117/12.2312475

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2312475 2018

  11. [11]

    J., Djorgovski, S

    Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 870, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/870 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 Gentile Fusillo, N. P., Tremblay, P.-E., Cukanovaite, E., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 3877, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2672

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/870 2009

  12. [12]

    J., van Roestel, J., & Wong, T

    Green, M. J., van Roestel, J., & Wong, T. L. S. 2025, A&A, 700, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554925

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554925 2025

  13. [13]

    Grether, D., & Lineweaver, C. H. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1051, doi: 10.1086/500161

    work page doi:10.1086/500161 2006

  14. [14]

    O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al

    Husser, T.-O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 553, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219058 2013

  15. [15]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 592

    Ivanova, N. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 592

    2020

  16. [16]

    ( year 2013 ), month Feb

    Ivanova, N., Justham, S., Chen, X., et al. 2013, A&A Rv, 21, 59, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2 2013

  17. [17]

    M., Twicken, J

    Jenkins, J. M., Twicken, J. D., McCauliff, S., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV, ed. G. Chiozzi & J. C. Guzman, 99133E, doi: 10.1117/12.2233418

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2233418 2016

  18. [18]

    Y., Muirhead, P

    Kesseli, A. Y., Muirhead, P. S., Mann, A. W., & Mace, G. 2018, AJ, 155, 225, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabccb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabccb 2018

  19. [19]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 720, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1146 Kov´ acs, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T

    Kupfer, T. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 720, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1146 Kov´ acs, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020802

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1146 2022

  20. [20]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 5208, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa547

    Krushinsky, V., Benni, P., Burdanov, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 5208, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa547

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa547 2020

  21. [21]

    Mind your Ps and Qs: the Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars

    Moe, M., & Di Stefano, R. 2017, ApJS, 230, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6 2017

  22. [22]

    M., Schneider, F

    Moreno, M. M., Schneider, F. R. N., R¨ opke, F. K., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142731

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142731 2022

  23. [23]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 23, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000169

    Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., & Marcout, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 23, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000169

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000169 2000

  24. [24]

    1976, IAU Symposium, Vol

    Paczynski, Eggleton, P., Mitton, S., & Whelan, J., eds. 1976, IAU Symposium, Vol. 73, Structure and evolution of close binary systems : symposium no. 73 held in

    1976

  25. [25]

    Cambridge, England, 28 July-1 August, 1975

    1975

  26. [26]

    G., Agurto-Gangas, C., G¨ ansicke, B

    Parsons, S. G., Agurto-Gangas, C., G¨ ansicke, B. T., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2194, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv382

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv382 2015

  27. [27]

    G., G¨ ansicke, B

    Parsons, S. G., G¨ ansicke, B. T., Marsh, T. R., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1083, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2345

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2345 2018

  28. [28]

    Buckley, D. A. H. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 1183, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2197

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2197 2022

  29. [29]

    Rackham, B. V. 2023, speclib, 0.0-beta.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7868050

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7868050 2023

  30. [30]

    V., & de Wit, J

    Rackham, B. V., & de Wit, J. 2024, AJ, 168, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad5833

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad5833 2024

  31. [31]

    2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, page range, doi: 10.1007/s10686-014-9383-4

    Rauer, H., Catala, C., Aerts, C., et al. 2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249, doi: 10.1007/s10686-014-9383-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10686-014-9383-4 2014

  32. [32]

    M., et al

    Rebassa-Mansergas, A., Solano, E., Jim´ enez-Esteban, F. M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 5201, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2039

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2039 2021

  33. [33]

    J., et al

    Rebassa-Mansergas, A., Solano, E., Brown, A. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A153, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554700

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554700 2025

  34. [34]

    The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 Minute-Scale Eclipse Regime inTESS11

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 2015

  35. [35]

    2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 645, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038827

    Sebastian, D., Delrez, L., Gillon, M., et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 645, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038827

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038827 2021

  36. [36]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.00439, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.00439

    Shariat, C., & El-Badry, K. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.00439, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.00439

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.00439 2026

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    work page doi:10.1086/498708 2006

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Paegert, M., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467 van Roestel, J., Kupfer, T., Bell, K. J., et al. 2021, ApJL, 919, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac22b7 van Roestel, J., Rodriguez, A. C., Szkody, P., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A242, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451945

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467 2019

  39. [39]

    A., Xu, S., et al

    Vanderburg, A., Rappaport, S. A., Xu, S., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 363, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2713-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2713-y 2020

  40. [40]

    G., Adelman , J., Anderson , Jr., J

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., J. E., et al. 2000a, AJ, 120, 1579, doi: 10.1086/301513 —. 2000b, AJ, 120, 1579, doi: 10.1086/301513 12Cavalier, de Wit, et al. APPENDIX A.SUPPLEMENTARY DIAGNOSTIC PLOTS This appendix presents the diagnostic plots (i.e., data and posterior probability distributions) used to derive the parameter values reported in T...

    work page doi:10.1086/301513