pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03922 · v1 · pith:42JUIJZRnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · quant-ph

Fast single-atom preparation in optical tweezers via Rydberg blockade

Yiyi Li , Vernon M. Hughes , Michael Peper , Yicheng Bao , Chenyuan Li , Sanzhar Bissenali , Jeff D. Thompson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 07:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph quant-ph
keywords optical tweezersRydberg blockadesingle-atom preparationautoionizationneutral atomsytterbiumquantum information
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rydberg blockade and autoionization remove excess atoms from optical tweezers in 65 microseconds while retaining single atoms at 58 percent occupancy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to clear extra atoms from each tweezer on a microsecond scale instead of the milliseconds required by light-assisted collisions. Two-photon excitation to a Rydberg state exploits blockade so that only one atom per tweezer survives autoionization, dropping multi-atom probability to 1 percent in 64.8 microseconds with 58.2 percent single-atom retention. A sympathetic reader would care because this speed-up removes a major limit on how quickly neutral-atom arrays can be replenished for deeper quantum circuits. The same protocol run from a metastable state reaches 74.8 percent filling at the price of extra preparation time, with the final fraction still capped by an unexplained two-body loss.

Core claim

With two-photon Rydberg excitation from the ground state, multi-atom probability is reduced to 1 percent in 64.8 microseconds while retaining single atoms in 58.2(2) percent of the tweezers, matching the filling fraction obtained with light-assisted collisions under identical conditions but more than two orders of magnitude faster. Single-photon excitation from the metastable state yields 74.8(3) percent single-atom filling with lower single-atom loss, at the expense of additional overhead to reach that state. The final filling fraction remains limited by an unexplained two-body loss mechanism.

What carries the argument

Intra-tweezer Rydberg blockade combined with autoionization for selective removal of one atom from multiply occupied tweezers.

If this is right

  • Replenishment cycles for continuously loaded tweezer arrays shorten from milliseconds to tens of microseconds.
  • Neutral-atom processors gain the ability to run deeper circuits before coherence limits are reached.
  • Single-atom preparation reaches performance comparable to light-assisted collisions without relying on slow collisional dynamics.
  • Excitation from the metastable state trades preparation time for a higher 74.8 percent filling fraction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-body loss channel is identified and suppressed, the method could approach deterministic single-atom loading on microsecond timescales.
  • The blockade step may be combined with existing Rydberg-mediated entangling gates to reduce total overhead in a full quantum processor cycle.
  • Testing the protocol across different atomic species would reveal whether the loss mechanism is species-specific or general.

Load-bearing premise

The Rydberg excitation plus autoionization step removes exactly one atom from each multiply occupied tweezer without creating additional uncontrolled loss channels that would lower the measured single-atom fractions.

What would settle it

Repeating the protocol and recording the final atom-number histogram would falsify the claim if multi-atom probability stays above a few percent or single-atom occupancy falls substantially below 58 percent after 65 microseconds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03922 by Chenyuan Li, Jeff D. Thompson, Michael Peper, Sanzhar Bissenali, Vernon M. Hughes, Yicheng Bao, Yiyi Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Collective Rabi oscillations for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Relevant transitions for the two-photon excitation scheme. The 556 nm laser is used for optical pumping, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Experimental results (circles) and simulations (dashed and solid lines) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Single-atom preparation with single-photon Ryd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of effective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The probability of exciting a single atom to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Continuously replenished optical tweezer arrays will unlock unlimited-depth quantum circuits with neutral atom qubits. A key bottleneck limiting the cycle time of these systems is removing atoms from tweezers initially loaded with more than one atom. In the conventional technique of light-assisted collisions, slow collisional dynamics limit the timescale for removing excess atoms to several milliseconds. Here, we propose and demonstrate a scheme for selectively removing one atom at a time from multiply occupied tweezers on a microsecond timescale, using intra-tweezer Rydberg blockade and autoionization. We demonstrate the protocol in $^{171}$Yb in two complementary regimes. With two-photon Rydberg excitation from the ground state, we reduce multi-atom probability to 1% in 64.8 $\mu$s, while retaining single atoms in 58.2(2)% of the tweezers, which is comparable to the filling fraction achieved with light-assisted collisions under the same experimental conditions, but over two orders of magnitude faster. With single-photon excitation from the metastable state $^3P_0$, reduced single-atom loss enables a higher filling fraction of 74.8(3)%, at the cost of additional temporal overhead to prepare the atoms in $^3P_0$. The final filling fraction is limited by an unexplained two-body loss mechanism, which, if solved, could enable fast, quasi-deterministic loading.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of fast single-atom preparation in optical tweezers using intra-tweezer Rydberg blockade and autoionization in 171Yb atoms. With two-photon excitation from the ground state, multi-atom probability is reduced to 1% in 64.8 μs while retaining single atoms in 58.2(2)% of tweezers, comparable to light-assisted collisions under matched conditions but over two orders of magnitude faster. Single-photon excitation from the metastable 3P0 state yields 74.8(3)% filling fraction. The final filling fraction is limited by an unexplained two-body loss mechanism.

Significance. If the result holds, this provides a substantial advance for neutral-atom quantum processors by reducing atom-array preparation cycle times from milliseconds to microseconds, enabling higher repetition rates for continuously replenished arrays. The direct side-by-side comparison to the conventional light-assisted collision method under identical conditions, together with concrete numbers and uncertainties in two complementary excitation regimes, strengthens the central claim of a practical speedup.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract, final paragraph: the filling fraction is stated to be limited by an unexplained two-body loss mechanism. This directly impacts the central claim of selective, clean removal of one atom from multiply occupied tweezers without introducing new loss channels, because the reported 58.2(2)% and 74.8(3)% single-atom fractions already incorporate this loss; without characterization of its origin (e.g., dependence on Rabi frequency, detuning, or intra-tweezer density), the comparability to light-assisted collisions and the assertion of controlled preparation remain provisional.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract, final paragraph: the filling fraction is stated to be limited by an unexplained two-body loss mechanism. This directly impacts the central claim of selective, clean removal of one atom from multiply occupied tweezers without introducing new loss channels, because the reported 58.2(2)% and 74.8(3)% single-atom fractions already incorporate this loss; without characterization of its origin (e.g., dependence on Rabi frequency, detuning, or intra-tweezer density), the comparability to light-assisted collisions and the assertion of controlled preparation remain provisional.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the two-body loss channel remains uncharacterized in the present work. The manuscript already states this limitation explicitly and notes that solving it could enable quasi-deterministic loading. The central result, however, is the demonstration of selective multi-atom removal on a 64.8 μs timescale via intra-tweezer Rydberg blockade, reducing the multi-atom probability to 1 % while achieving filling fractions comparable to light-assisted collisions performed under identical conditions. The side-by-side comparison therefore already incorporates all loss channels present in each protocol. The preparation remains controlled in the sense that excess atoms are removed with high selectivity on a microsecond scale; the additional loss affects the absolute filling fraction but does not invalidate the reported speedup or the direct experimental comparison. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Characterization of the origin of the observed two-body loss (e.g., dependence on Rabi frequency, detuning, or density)

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental measurements with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is a purely experimental demonstration paper. The central results (multi-atom probability reduced to 1% in 64.8 μs, single-atom retention of 58.2(2)% or 74.8(3)%) are reported as directly measured outcomes under the described protocol. No equations, predictions, or first-principles derivations are presented that could reduce to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. The mention of an 'unexplained two-body loss mechanism' is an empirical observation, not a load-bearing theoretical step. The protocol's assumptions are stated explicitly and the filling fractions are benchmarked against light-assisted collisions under identical conditions, keeping the work self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The demonstration rests on established atomic-physics mechanisms rather than new postulates or fitted parameters; no free parameters are introduced to match the target result.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Rydberg blockade prevents simultaneous excitation of two atoms within the same tweezer
    Invoked to enable selective removal; standard in Rydberg-atom literature.
  • domain assumption Autoionization ejects the Rydberg atom from the trap
    Known decay channel used for state-selective loss.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5795 in / 1400 out tokens · 27706 ms · 2026-06-28T07:15:20.518500+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The sign ∆ e∆r <0 is chosen 7 FIG

    Experimental details To excite ground state atoms to the Rydberg state|r⟩, we use a two-photon excitation with typical Rabi fre- quencies of Ω399/2π= 130 MHz (beam powerP= 2 mW, beam waistw 0 = 500µm) and Ω 395/2π= 70 MHz (P= 280 mW,w 0 = 50µm), and an intermediate state detun- ing of ∆ e =−1020 MHz. The sign ∆ e∆r <0 is chosen 7 FIG. 5. Cumulative distri...

  2. [2]

    For multiple atoms within a tweezer, we ac- count for the Rydberg blockade with aV /2π= 100 MHz interaction energy for pairs of atoms in the Rydberg state

    Simulation details For the two-photon Rydberg excitations from 1S0, we model the Rabi oscillations and protocol with master- equation-based simulations with collapse operators to ac- count for intermediate state scattering and finite Ryd- berg lifetime. For multiple atoms within a tweezer, we ac- count for the Rydberg blockade with aV /2π= 100 MHz interac...

  3. [3]

    Experimental details In order to limit atom losses during the preparation and readout of 3P0, it is necessary to cool the atoms using gray-molasses cooling detailed in Ref. [23]. The atomic temperature of the 3P0 atoms when the proto- col is performed is 9µK. Light-assisted collisions during the cooling process result in a sub-Poissonian distribution of t...

  4. [4]

    The population evolutions are consistent with an additionalN→N−2 loss channel

    Simulation details For the single-photon Rydberg excitations from 3P0, in both the multi-atom Rabi oscillations and single-atom preparation data we observe that theN= 0 population increases by more than expected from just the single- atom losses of 0.26(2)%. The population evolutions are consistent with an additionalN→N−2 loss channel. Thus, we include a ...

  5. [5]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    B. W. Reichardt, A. Paetznick, D. Aasen, I. Basov, J. M. Bello-Rivas, P. Bonderson, R. Chao, W. van Dam, M. B. Hastings, R. V. Mishmash, A. Paz, M. P. da Silva, A. Sundaram, K. M. Svore, A. Vaschillo, Z. Wang, M. Zanner, W. B. Cairncross, C.-A. Chen, D. Crow, H. Kim, J. M. Kindem, J. King, M. McDonald, M. A. Norcia, A. Ryou, M. Stone, L. Wadleigh, K. Barn...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    M. J. Bedalov, M. Blakely, P. D. Buttler, C. Carna- han, F. T. Chong, W. C. Chung, D. C. Cole, P. Goipo- ria, P. Gokhale, B. Heim, G. T. Hickman, E. B. Jones, R. A. Jones, P. Khalate, J.-S. Kim, K. W. Kuper, M. T. Lichtman, S. Lee, D. Mason, N. A. Neff-Mallon, T. W. Noel, V. Omole, A. G. Radnaev, R. Rines, M. Saffman, E. Shabtai, M. H. Teo, B. Thotakura, ...

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Zhang, G

    B. Zhang, G. Liu, G. Bornet, S. P. Horvath, P. Peng, S. Ma, S. Huang, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, Leverag- ing erasure errors in logical qubits with metastable 171Yb atoms, arXiv:2506.13724

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Mathiot, E

    P. Mathiot, E. Garnaoui, A.-U. Leriche, E. Philip, B. Al- brecht, C. Briosne-Fr´ ejaville, L. Cardarelli, A. Cornil- lot, G. Cournez, L. Couturier, J. D. Hond, R. E. Kous- saifi, T. Eritzpokoff, F. Fasola, A. A. Gentile, C. Gyurik, C. Hamot, L. Henriet, G. Herc´ e, M. Kaicher, L. Lass- abli` ere, F.-M. L. R´ egent, E. Leroux, Y. Machu, H. Ma- mann, L. Ort...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Labuhn, D

    H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. De L´ es´ eleuc, T. Macr` ı, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Tunable two- dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models, Nature534, 667 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. L¨ auchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hun- dreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkel- stein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos, Nature613, 468 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    A. Cao, W. J. Eckner, T. Lukin Yelin, A. W. Young, S. Jandura, L. Yan, K. Kim, G. Pupillo, J. Ye, N. Dark- wah Oppong, and A. M. Kaufman, Multi-qubit gates and Schr¨ odinger cat states in an optical clock, Nature634, 315 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    A. L. Shaw, R. Finkelstein, R. B.-S. Tsai, P. Scholl, T. H. Yoon, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Multi-ensemble metrology by programming local rotations with atom movements, Nat. Phys.20, 195 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Schlosser, G

    N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, I. Protsenko, and P. Grangier, Sub-poissonian loading of single atoms in a microscopic dipole trap, Nature411, 1024 (2001)

    2001

  19. [19]

    Schlosser, G

    N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, and P. Grangier, Collisional Blockade in Microscopic Optical Dipole Traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 023005 (2002)

    2002

  20. [20]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science354, 1021 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    Endres, H

    M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    H. Kim, W. Lee, H.-g. Lee, H. Jo, Y. Song, and J. Ahn, In situ single-atom array synthesis using dynamic holo- graphic optical tweezers, Nat. Commun.7, 13317 (2016)

    2016

  23. [23]

    Pause, T

    L. Pause, T. Preuschoff, D. Sch¨ affner, M. Schlosser, and G. Birkl, Reservoir-based deterministic loading of single- atom tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L032009 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    M. A. Norcia, H. Kim, W. B. Cairncross, M. Stone, 10 A. Ryou, M. Jaffe, M. O. Brown, K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, T. C. Bohdanowicz, A. Brown, K. Cas- sella, C.-A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow, J. Epstein, C. Griger, E. Halperin, F. Hummel, A. M. W. Jones, J. M. Kindem, J. King, K. Kotru, J. Lauigan, M. Li, M. Lu, E. Megidish, J. Marjanovic, M. Mc- Donald, T. Mitt...

    2024

  25. [25]

    Gyger, M

    F. Gyger, M. Ammenwerth, R. Tao, H. Timme, S. Sni- girev, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033104 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    J. A. Muniz, D. Crow, H. Kim, J. M. Kindem, W. B. Cairncross, A. Ryou, T. C. Bohdanowicz, C.-A. Chen, Y. Ji, A. M. W. Jones, E. Megidish, C. Nishiguchi, M. Ur- banek, L. Wadleigh, T. Wilkason, D. Aasen, K. Barnes, J. M. Bello-Rivas, I. Bloomfield, G. Booth, A. Brown, M. O. Brown, K. Cassella, G. Cowan, J. Epstein, M. Feld- kamp, C. Griger, Y. Hassan, A. H...

    2025

  27. [27]

    Y. Li, Y. Bao, M. Peper, C. Li, and J. D. Thompson, Fast, continuous and coherent atom replacement in a neutral atom qubit array, arXiv:2506.15633

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    N.-C. Chiu, E. C. Trapp, J. Guo, M. H. Abobeih, L. M. Stewart, S. Hollerith, P. L. Stroganov, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, S. H. Li, X. Lyu, L. M. Peters, D. Bluvstein, T. T. Wang, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000- qubit system, Nature646, 1075 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, F. R¨ onchen, A. Jenkins, and A. M. Kaufman, Midcircuit Operations Using theomgArchitecture in Neutral Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. X13, 041035 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Muzi Falconi, R

    A. Muzi Falconi, R. Panza, S. Sbernardori, R. Forti, R. Klemt, O. Abdel Karim, M. Marinelli, and F. Scazza, Microsecond-Scale High-Survival and Number-Resolved Detection of Ytterbium Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 203402 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    A. L. Shaw, A. Soper, D. Shadmany, A. Kumar, L. Palm, D.-Y. Koh, V. Kaxiras, L. Taneja, M. Jaffe, D. I. Schus- ter, and J. Simon, A cavity-array microscope for parallel single-atom interfacing, Nature , 1 (2026)

    2026

  32. [32]

    S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-Fidelity Gates and Mid-Circuit Erasure Conversion in an Atomic Qubit, Nature622, 279 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Scholl, A

    P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Erasure conversion in a high- fidelity Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature622, 273 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Lin, H.-S

    R. Lin, H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, Z.-R. Zhao, L.-T. Zheng, T.-R. Hu, H.-M. Wu, Z. Wu, W.-J. Ma, Y. Gao, Y.-K. Zhu, Z.-F. Su, W.-L. Ouyang, Y.-C. Zhang, J. Rui, M.- C. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, AI-Enabled Parallel Assembly of Thousands of Defect-Free Neutral Atom Ar- rays, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 060602 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    S. Wang, W. Zhang, T. Zhang, S. Mei, Y. Wang, J. Hu, and W. Chen, Accelerating the Assembly of Defect-Free Atomic Arrays with Maximum Parallelisms, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 054032 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    W. Tian, W. J. Wee, A. Qu, B. J. M. Lim, P. R. Datla, V. P. W. Koh, and H. Loh, Parallel Assembly of Arbitrary Defect-Free Atom Arrays with a Multitweezer Algorithm, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034048 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    X. Wei, Z. Li, A. V. Karve, A. L. Shaw, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, A 10 Megahertz Spatial Light Modulator, arXiv:2601.08906

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Bytyqi, J

    E. Bytyqi, J. Sinclair, J. Ramette, and V. Vuleti´ c, Device for MHz-rate rastering of arbitrary 2D optical potentials, arXiv:2602.16025

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    Fuhrmanek, R

    A. Fuhrmanek, R. Bourgain, Y. R. P. Sortais, and A. Browaeys, Light-assisted collisions between a few cold atoms in a microscopic dipole trap, Phys. Rev. A85, 062708 (2012)

    2012

  40. [40]

    S. K. Pampel, M. Marinelli, M. O. Brown, J. P. D’Incao, and C. A. Regal, Quantifying Light-Assisted Collisions in Optical Tweezers across the Hyperfine Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 013202 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    D. S. Gr¨ un, L. B. Giacomelli, A. Tashchilina, R. Donofrio, F. Borchers, T. Bland, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Light-assisted collisions in tweezer-trapped lanthanides, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023067 (2026)

    2026

  42. [42]

    Gr¨ unzweig, A

    T. Gr¨ unzweig, A. Hilliard, M. McGovern, and M. Ander- sen, Near-deterministic preparation of a single atom in an optical microtrap, Nat. Phys.6, 951 (2010)

    2010

  43. [43]

    B. J. Lester, N. Luick, A. M. Kaufman, C. M. Reynolds, and C. A. Regal, Rapid production of uniformly filled arrays of neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 073003 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    M. O. Brown, T. Thiele, C. Kiehl, T.-W. Hsu, and C. A. Regal, Gray-Molasses Optical-Tweezer Loading: Controlling Collisions for Scaling Atom-Array Assembly, Phys. Rev. X9, 011057 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    Jenkins, J

    A. Jenkins, J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, and A. M. Kaufman, Ytterbium Nuclear-Spin Qubits in an Optical Tweezer Array, Phys. Rev. X12, 021027 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    J. Zhu, C. Chen, L. Zhou, X. Xie, C. Jiang, Z. Ding, F. Wu, F. Yang, G. Wang, Q. Gong, P. Zhang, S. Zhang, and P. Peng, High-efficiency loading of 2,400 Ytterbium atoms in optical tweezer arrays, arXiv:2512.19795

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    M. T. DePue, C. McCormick, S. L. Winoto, S. Oliver, and D. S. Weiss, Unity Occupation of Sites in a 3D Op- tical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2262 (1999)

    1999

  48. [48]

    Vetsch, S

    E. Vetsch, S. T. Dawkins, R. Mitsch, D. Reitz, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Nanofiber-Based Optical Trapping of Cold Neutral Atoms, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.18, 1763 (2012)

    2012

  49. [49]

    Saffman and T

    M. Saffman and T. G. Walker, Creating single-atom and single-photon sources from entangled atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. A66, 065403 (2002)

    2002

  50. [50]

    Ebert, A

    M. Ebert, A. Gill, M. Gibbons, X. Zhang, M. Saffman, and T. G. Walker, Atomic Fock State Preparation Using Rydberg Blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 043602 (2014). 11

    2014

  51. [51]

    Ebert, M

    M. Ebert, M. Kwon, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman, Coherence and Rydberg Blockade of Atomic Ensemble Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 093601 (2015)

    2015

  52. [52]

    A. Gaj, A. T. Krupp, J. B. Balewski, R. L¨ ow, S. Hof- ferberth, and T. Pfau, From molecular spectra to a den- sity shift in dense Rydberg gases, Nat. Commun.5, 4546 (2014)

    2014

  53. [53]

    Derevianko, P

    A. Derevianko, P. K´ om´ ar, T. Topcu, R. M. Kroeze, and M. D. Lukin, Effects of molecular resonances on Rydberg blockade, Phys. Rev. A92, 063419 (2015)

    2015

  54. [54]

    M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 037901 (2001)

    2001

  55. [55]

    I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 857 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    A. P. Burgers, S. Ma, S. Saskin, J. Wilson, M. A. Alarc´ on, C. H. Greene, and J. D. Thompson, Controlling Rydberg Excitations Using Ion-Core Transitions in Alkaline-Earth Atom-Tweezer Arrays, PRX Quantum3, 020326 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    A. Cao, T. L. Yelin, W. J. Eckner, N. D. Oppong, and A. M. Kaufman, Autoionization-Enhanced Rydberg Dressing by Fast Contaminant Removal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 133201 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Legrand, X

    T. Legrand, X. Wang, M. Simi´ c, F. Pausewang, W. Alt, E. Uru˜ nuela, M. T. Eiles, and S. Hofferberth, Reveal- ing Electron-Ytterbium Interactions through Rydberg Molecular Spectroscopy, arXiv:2512.20609

    arXiv

  59. [59]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    G. Liu, G. Bornet, D. Kurdak, M. Xiao, C. Li, B. Zhang, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates leveraging low- rank Hessian optimization, Manuscript in prep

  61. [61]

    Schlagm¨ uller, T

    M. Schlagm¨ uller, T. C. Liebisch, F. Engel, K. S. Klein- bach, F. B¨ ottcher, U. Hermann, K. M. Westphal, A. Gaj, R. L¨ ow, S. Hofferberth, T. Pfau, J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, and C. H. Greene, Ultracold Chemical Reactions of a Single Ry- dberg Atom in a Dense Gas, Phys. Rev. X6, 031020 (2016)

    2016

  62. [62]

    Geppert, M

    P. Geppert, M. Alth¨ on, D. Fichtner, and H. Ott, Diffusive-like redistribution in state-changing collisions between Rydberg atoms and ground state atoms, Nat. Commun.12, 3900 (2021)

    2021

  63. [63]

    R. M. Potvliege and C. S. Adams, Photo-ionization in far- off-resonance optical lattices, New J. Phys.8, 163 (2006)

    2006

  64. [64]

    Pillet, W

    P. Pillet, W. W. Smith, R. Kachru, N. H. Tran, and T. F. Gallagher, Microwave Ionization of Na Rydberg Levels, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1042 (1983)

    1983

  65. [65]

    T. F. Gallagher, L. M. Humphrey, W. E. Cooke, R. M. Hill, and S. A. Edelstein, Field ionization of highly ex- cited states of sodium, Phys. Rev. A16, 1098 (1977)

    1977