pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04768 · v2 · pith:SSGENRIDnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Ionization energies for Rydberg ⁴ He (1snp\,^(1,3)P) states using the correlated B-spline basis function method

Jing Chi , Hao Fang , Yong-Hui Zhang , Li-Yan Tang , Ting-Yun Shi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 03:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords heliumRydberg statesionization energyB-spline methodquantum defectQED correctionsmetastable states
0
0 comments X

The pith

The correlated B-spline method yields kHz-accurate ionization energies for helium Rydberg nP states that agree with Hylleraas calculations and determine metastable 2S energies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends the correlated B-spline basis function method to high-precision calculations of ionization energies for helium Rydberg 1snp ^{1,3}P states with n from 24 to 35. It evaluates nonrelativistic energies, relativistic m alpha^4 corrections including recoil, m alpha^5 QED terms, and partial m alpha^6 contributions, estimating remaining higher-order terms via 1/n^3 scaling. The results reach kHz-level accuracy and show excellent agreement with independent Hylleraas calculations, providing cross-validation between the two approaches. Quantum-defect parameters are extracted to extrapolate the energies to n=102. Combining the Rydberg ionization energies with high-precision experimental 2S to nP transition frequencies produces ionization energies for the 2^1S and 2^3S metastable states.

Core claim

The ionization energies for Rydberg ^4He (1snp ^{1,3}P) states (n=24--35) have been computed using the correlated B-spline basis function method, including nonrelativistic, relativistic, and QED effects up to partial order m alpha^6 with 1/n^3 estimates for the rest. These energies achieve kHz-level accuracy and show excellent agreement with Hylleraas calculations. Quantum-defect parameters derived from them allow extrapolation to n=102. Combining the Rydberg ionization energies with experimental 2S to nP transition frequencies gives the ionization energy of the 2^1S state as 960332040.533(10)stat(20)sys MHz and of the 2^3S state as 1152842742.7274(53)stat(25)sys MHz, with the 2^1S result co

What carries the argument

The correlated B-spline basis function (C-BSBF) method, which uses a unified basis set to evaluate nonrelativistic energies together with relativistic and QED corrections for Rydberg helium states.

If this is right

  • Quantum-defect parameters are determined from the calculated ionization energies.
  • Ionization energies are extrapolated up to n=102 using the quantum-defect expansion.
  • Ionization energies for the metastable 2^{1}S and 2^{3}S states are obtained by combining theoretical Rydberg energies with experimental transition frequencies.
  • The C-BSBF results provide cross-validation with Hylleraas calculations.
  • The 2^{1}S ionization energy is consistent with experimental Rydberg-series extrapolation, while the 2^{3}S shows a small difference of 0.019(10) MHz.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These high-precision values could serve as benchmarks for future QED calculations in few-electron systems.
  • The method's success suggests it can be extended to other angular momentum states or higher n with similar accuracy.
  • The discrepancy in the 2^3S energy points to a possible need for refined experimental measurements or inclusion of additional theoretical terms.
  • Extrapolated energies to very high n may find use in precision spectroscopy or astrophysical modeling of helium.

Load-bearing premise

Higher-order QED contributions not explicitly calculated can be reliably estimated by simple 1/n^3 scaling.

What would settle it

An independent calculation or measurement showing disagreement larger than kHz level between the C-BSBF ionization energies and Hylleraas results for any of the n=24-35 states, or a direct measurement of the 2^3S ionization energy outside the reported uncertainty range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04768 by Hao Fang, Jing Chi, Li-Yan Tang, Ting-Yun Shi, Yong-Hui Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We extend the correlated B-spline basis function (C-BSBF) method to high-precision calculations of the ionization energies of helium Rydberg $n^{1,3}P$ states ($n=24$--$35$). Using a unified basis set, we evaluate nonrelativistic energies, relativistic corrections of order $m\alpha^4$ (including finite-mass recoil), QED contributions of order $m\alpha^5$, and partial $m\alpha^6$ terms (singlet-triplet mixing, one- and two-loop radiative corrections). The remaining higher-order contributions are estimated via $1/n^3$ scaling. The resulting ionization energies achieve kHz-level accuracy and are in excellent agreement with independent Hylleraas calculations, thereby providing cross-validation between two distinct theoretical approaches. From these data, the quantum-defect parameters are determined and used to extrapolate the ionization energies up to $n=102$. Combining our Rydberg ionization energies with high-precision experimental $2S \rightarrow nP$ transition frequencies yields the ionization energies for the metastable $2^{1}S$ and $2^{3}S$ states as \num{960332040.533(10)}$_\mathrm{stat}(20)_ \mathrm{sys}$ MHz and \num{1152842742.7274(53)}$_\mathrm{stat}(25)_ \mathrm{sys}$ MHz, respectively. The C-BSBF result for the $2 \, ^1 S$ state is consistent with the experimental ionization energy obtained from Rydberg-series extrapolation, while for the $2 \, ^3 S$ state the difference is 0.019(10) MHz.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the correlated B-spline basis function (C-BSBF) method to high-precision calculations of ionization energies for helium Rydberg 1snp ^{1,3}P states (n=24–35). Using a unified basis, it computes nonrelativistic energies, mα^4 relativistic corrections (including recoil), mα^5 QED terms, and partial mα^6 contributions (singlet-triplet mixing, one- and two-loop radiative), estimates remaining higher-order terms via 1/n^3 scaling, reports kHz-level accuracy with excellent agreement to independent Hylleraas results, determines quantum-defect parameters for extrapolation to n=102, and combines the Rydberg energies with experimental 2S→nP frequencies to derive ionization energies for the 2^1S and 2^3S metastable states as 960332040.533(10)stat(20)sys MHz and 1152842742.7274(53)stat(25)sys MHz, respectively, noting a 0.019 MHz difference for the triplet case.

Significance. If the kHz accuracy and error budgets hold, the work supplies valuable cross-validation between the C-BSBF and Hylleraas approaches for helium Rydberg states and delivers high-precision ionization energies for the metastable 2S states that can support precision spectroscopy and tests of QED in few-electron systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on QED contributions): the kHz-level accuracy claim for the ionization energies and the derived 2^1S/2^3S values rests on estimating all remaining higher-order contributions via 1/n^3 scaling. For n=24–35 this scaling is applied to partial mα^6 and higher terms whose n-dependence is not guaranteed to be purely 1/n^3 (two-loop radiative or recoil corrections can contain 1/n^4 or logarithmic pieces); any mismatch propagates directly into the reported 10–25 kHz uncertainties and the 0.019 MHz triplet discrepancy.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the quantum-defect parameters are fitted to the computed energies and then used for extrapolation to n=102, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the 1/n^3 scaling coefficient for omitted terms is independently constrained or that its uncertainty is folded into the final error budget.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that a 'unified basis set' is employed but provides no quantitative convergence data or basis-size dependence; these details are needed to substantiate the claimed precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments. We address each major comment below with our responses and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on QED contributions): the kHz-level accuracy claim for the ionization energies and the derived 2^1S/2^3S values rests on estimating all remaining higher-order contributions via 1/n^3 scaling. For n=24–35 this scaling is applied to partial mα^6 and higher terms whose n-dependence is not guaranteed to be purely 1/n^3 (two-loop radiative or recoil corrections can contain 1/n^4 or logarithmic pieces); any mismatch propagates directly into the reported 10–25 kHz uncertainties and the 0.019 MHz triplet discrepancy.

    Authors: The 1/n^3 scaling provides an estimate of the magnitude of the remaining uncomputed higher-order terms, consistent with the leading asymptotic behavior for Rydberg states. The partial mα^6 contributions we evaluate explicitly capture the dominant pieces, and the systematic uncertainties (10–25 kHz) are assigned conservatively to cover possible deviations from pure 1/n^3 scaling, including subleading 1/n^4 or logarithmic terms. The reported 0.019 MHz difference for the triplet state remains within the combined uncertainties. We will revise the manuscript to expand the discussion of the scaling assumption, reference the expected n-dependence of two-loop and recoil corrections, and clarify how these considerations enter the error budget. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the quantum-defect parameters are fitted to the computed energies and then used for extrapolation to n=102, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the 1/n^3 scaling coefficient for omitted terms is independently constrained or that its uncertainty is folded into the final error budget.

    Authors: The quantum-defect parameters are obtained from a fit to the full set of computed ionization energies (n=24–35), which already include the 1/n^3 estimates for omitted terms. The associated uncertainty is propagated through the extrapolation and incorporated into the reported systematic errors. We agree that an explicit demonstration would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph detailing the fitting procedure and the propagation of the scaling uncertainty into the final error budget for the n=102 extrapolations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper directly computes nonrelativistic energies plus mα^4, mα^5 and partial mα^6 corrections in a unified C-BSBF basis for n=24–35, applies an explicit 1/n^3 estimate only to omitted higher-order pieces, fits quantum-defect parameters to those computed values solely for extrapolation to n=102, and subtracts the resulting Rydberg ionization energies from measured 2S–nP frequencies to obtain the 2¹S and 2³S values. None of these steps matches any enumerated circularity pattern: the 1/n^3 scaling is stated as an estimation rather than a derived equality, the quantum-defect fit is standard post-processing and does not rename or predict the input energies, and no load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness theorem is invoked. The central accuracy claim therefore rests on the basis-set evaluation and external experimental data, not on any reduction to its own fitted inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central precision claim rests on standard QED perturbation theory, the 1/n^3 scaling assumption for omitted terms, and the adequacy of a single unified basis set across all corrections.

free parameters (1)
  • 1/n^3 scaling coefficient for higher-order terms
    Used to estimate remaining mα^6 and higher contributions after explicit partial terms.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption QED perturbation theory applies order-by-order up to mα^6 with finite-mass recoil included
    Invoked for all relativistic and radiative corrections listed in the abstract.
  • domain assumption A single unified B-spline basis suffices for nonrelativistic, relativistic, and QED contributions at kHz level
    Stated as the computational foundation for the unified calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5869 in / 1595 out tokens · 57938 ms · 2026-06-28T03:03:26.642290+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Iso. ” denotes the isoconfigurational contribution, and “Iso+Non-iso

    of ∞He are presented in Table I. The calculated results have converged to at least 14 significant digits. For comparison, high-accuracy values obtained using the Hylleraas basis [ 28] are also listed, and the present re- sults agree within the uncertainties. For lower principal quantum numbers ( n = 24 –27), the agreement is found to reach up to 18 signif...

  2. [2]

    van Rooij, J

    R. van Rooij, J. S. Borbely, J. Simonet, M. D. Hooger- land, K. S. E. Eikema, R. A. Rozendaal, and W. Vassen, Frequency metrology in quantum degenerate helium: Di- rect measurement of the 2 3S1 → 2 1S0 transition, Science 333, 196 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. R. Sun, J.-J. Chen, W. Jiang, K. Pachucki, and S.-M. Hu, Measurement of the frequency of the 2 3S− 2 3P transition of 4He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 263002 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    R. J. Rengelink, Y. Van Der Werf, R. P. M. J. W. Noter- mans, R. Jannin, K. S. E. Eikema, M. D. Hoogerland, and W. Vassen, Precision spectroscopy of helium in a magic wavelength optical dipole trap , Nat. Phys. 14, 1132 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Clausen, K

    G. Clausen, K. Gamlin, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology in a two-electron atom: The ioniza- tion energy of metastable triplet helium 2 3S1, Phys. Rev. A 111, 012817 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    Clausen and F

    G. Clausen and F. Merkt, Ionization Energy of Metastable 3He (2 3S1) and the Alpha- and Helion- Particle Charge-Radius Difference from Precision Spec- troscopy of the np Rydberg Series , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 223001 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Van Der Werf, K

    Y. Van Der Werf, K. Steinebach, R. Jannin, H. L. Bethlem, and K. S. E. Eikema, Alpha and helion par- ticle charge radius difference determined from quantum- degenerate helium, Science 388, 850 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Wen, J.-D

    J.-L. Wen, J.-D. Tang, Y.-N. Lv, Y. R. Sun, C.-L. Zou, J.- F. Dong, and S.-M. Hu, Postselection shifts the transition frequency of helium in an atomic beam , Sci. Adv. 11, eadu9796 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Steinebach, J

    K. Steinebach, J. C. J. Koelemeij, H. L. Bethlem, and K. S. E. Eikema, Spectroscopy of 4He at 0.25 ppt Uncer- tainty and Improved Alpha-Helion Charge-Radius Differ- ence Determination , arXiv:2601.19444 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    Pachucki, V

    K. Pachucki, V. Patkóš, and V. A. Yerokhin, Testing fundamental interactions on the helium atom , Phys. Rev. A 95, 062510 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    Patkóš, V

    V. Patkóš, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Complete α7m Lamb shift of helium triplet states , Phys. Rev. A 103, 042809 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Qi, P.-P

    X.-Q. Qi, P.-P. Zhang, Z.-C. Yan, L.-Y. Tang, A.-X. Chen, T.-Y. Shi, and Z.-X. Zhong, Toward resolving the discrepancy in helium-3 and helium-4 nuclear charge radii, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L022020 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Pachucki, V

    K. Pachucki, V. Patkóš, and V. A. Yerokhin, Second- order hyperfine correction to H, D, and 3He energy levels, Phys. Rev. A 110, 062806 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Pachucki, V

    K. Pachucki, V. Patkóš, and V. A. Yerokhin, QED nu- clear recoil effect in helium isotope shift , Phys. Rev. A 113, 012824 (2026)

    2026

  15. [15]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. R. Sun, J.-J. Chen, W. Jiang, K. Pachucki, and S.-M. Hu, Laser spectroscopy of the fine-structure splitting in the 23PJ levels of 4He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 063001 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    Clausen, P

    G. Clausen, P. Jansen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Ionization Energy of the Metastable 2 1S1 State of 4He from Rydberg-Series Ex- trapolation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 093001 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Clausen, S

    G. Clausen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Imaging-Assisted Single-Photon Doppler- Free Laser Spectroscopy and the Ionization Energy of Metastable Triplet Helium , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 103001 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    V. A. Yerokhin, V. Patkóš, M. Puchalski, and K. Pachucki, QED calculation of ionization energies of 1snd states in helium , Phys. Rev. A 102, 012807 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    Pachucki and V

    K. Pachucki and V. A. Yerokhin, Helium fine structure theory for determination of α, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 264, 012007 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    Dorrer, F

    C. Dorrer, F. Nez, B. de Beauvoir, L. Julien, and F. Biraben, Accurate measurement of the 2 3S1 − 3 3D1 two-photon transition frequency in helium: New determi- nation of the 2 3S1 lamb shift , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3658 (1997)

    1997

  21. [21]

    Luo, J.-L

    P.-L. Luo, J.-L. Peng, J. Hu, Y. Feng, L.-B. Wang, and J.-T. Shy, Precision frequency measurements of 3,4He 2 3P → 3 3D transitions at 588 nm , Phys. Rev. A 94, 062507 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    G. W. F. Drake and Z.-C. Yan, Energies and relativistic corrections for the Rydberg states of helium: Variational results and asymptotic analysis , Phys. Rev. A 46, 2378 (1992)

    1992

  23. [23]

    G. W. F. Drake, High precision theory of atomic helium , Phys. Scr. T83, 83 (1999)

    1999

  24. [24]

    V. A. Yerokhin and K. Pachucki, Theoretical energies of low-lying states of light helium-like ions , Phys. Rev. A 81, 022507 (2010)

    2010

  25. [25]

    D. T. Aznabaev, A. K. Bekbaev, and V. I. Korobov, Non- relativistic energy levels of helium atoms , Phys. Rev. A 98, 012510 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    Wu, S.-J

    F.-F. Wu, S.-J. Yang, Y.-H. Zhang, J.-Y. Zhang, H.- X. Qiao, T.-Y. Shi, and L.-Y. Tang, Relativistic full- configuration-interaction calculations of magic wave- lengths for the 2 3S1 → 2 1S0 transition of helium iso- topes, Phys. Rev. A 98, 040501 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    G. W. F. Drake, ed., Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , Springer Handbooks (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    A. T. Bondy, G. W. F. Drake, C. McLeod, E. M. R. Petrimoulx, X.-Q. Qi, and Z.-X. Zhong, Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: Comparison with experiment for the 1s24p 1P1 state ( n = 24), Phys. Rev. A 111, L010803 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    G. W. F. Drake, A. T. Bondy, O. P. Hallett, and B. C. Najem, Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: Results for 2 ≤ n ≤ 35 and comparison with experiments for the singlet and triplet P states, Phys. Rev. A 113, 012810 (2026)

    2026

  30. [30]

    Yang, X.-S

    S.-J. Yang, X.-S. Mei, T.-Y. Shi, and H.-X. Qiao, Ap- plication of the Hylleraas- B-spline basis set: Static dipole polarizabilities of helium , Phys. Rev. A 95, 062505 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    Yang, Y.-B

    S.-J. Yang, Y.-B. Tang, Y.-H. Zhao, T.-Y. Shi, and H.- X. Qiao, Application of the Hylleraas- B-spline basis set: Nonrelativistic bethe logarithm of helium , Phys. Rev. A 100, 042509 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Fang, Y.-H

    H. Fang, Y.-H. Zhang, P.-P. Zhang, and T.-Y. Shi, Ap- plication of the correlated B-spline basis functions to the leading relativistic and QED corrections of helium , Phys. Rev. A 108, 062818 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Fang, Y.-H

    H. Fang, Y.-H. Zhang, L.-Y. Tang, and T.-Y. Shi, Sub– 14 parts-per-million theoretical calculations of dipole polar- izabilities for helium n1,3S (n = 1 to 7) states using cor- related b-spline basis functions, Phys. Rev. A 110, 062823 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    J. Chi, H. Fang, Y.-H. Zhang, X.-Q. Qi, L.-Y. Tang, and T.-Y. Shi, Accurate nonrelativistic energy calculations for helium 1snp 1,3P (n = 2 to 27) states via correlated B- spline basis functions , Atoms 13, 72 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    H. Fang, J. Chi, X.-Q. Qi, Y.-H. Zhang, L.-Y. Tang, and T.-Y. Shi, Precise ab initio calculations of 4He (1snp 3PJ ) fine structure of high Rydberg states , Phys. Rev. A 113, 012812 (2026)

    2026

  36. [36]

    P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, B. N. Taylor, and E. Tiesinga, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physi- cal constants: 2022 , Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 025002 (2025)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Caswell and G

    W. Caswell and G. Lepage, Effective lagrangians for bound state problems in QED, QCD, and other field the- ories, Phys. Lett. B 167, 437 (1986)

    1986

  38. [38]

    Pachucki, Higher-order effective hamiltonian for light atomic systems , Phys

    K. Pachucki, Higher-order effective hamiltonian for light atomic systems , Phys. Rev. A 71, 012503 (2005)

    2005

  39. [39]

    Pachucki, Helium energy levels including mα6 correc- tions, Phys

    K. Pachucki, Helium energy levels including mα6 correc- tions, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062510 (2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    Bachau, E

    H. Bachau, E. Cormier, P. Decleva, J. E. Hansen, and F. Martín, Applications of B-splines in atomic and molec- ular physics , Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 1815 (2001)

    2001

  41. [41]

    D. M. Brink and G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 1994)

    1994

  42. [42]

    G. W. F. Drake, Angular integrals and radial recurrence relations for two-electron matrix elements in Hylleraas coordinates, Phys. Rev. A 18, 820 (1978)

    1978

  43. [43]

    Pachucki and V

    K. Pachucki and V. A. Yerokhin, Theory of the he- lium isotope shift , J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 44, 031206 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Araki, Quantum-electrodynamical corrections to energy-levels of helium , Prog

    H. Araki, Quantum-electrodynamical corrections to energy-levels of helium , Prog. Theor. Phys. 17, 619 (1957)

    1957

  45. [45]

    Sucher, Energy levels of the two-electron atom to order α3 Ry; ionization energy of helium , Phys

    J. Sucher, Energy levels of the two-electron atom to order α3 Ry; ionization energy of helium , Phys. Rev. 109, 1010 (1958)

    1958

  46. [46]

    Schwartz, Lamb shift in the helium atom , Phys

    C. Schwartz, Lamb shift in the helium atom , Phys. Rev. 123, 1700 (1961)

    1961

  47. [47]

    Drake and S

    G. Drake and S. P. Goldman, Bethe logarithms for Ps −, H−, and heliumlike atoms , Can. J. Phys. 77, 835 (2000)

    2000

  48. [48]

    V. I. Korobov, Regular and singular integrals for relativis- tic and QED matrix elements of the coulomb three-body problem, for an exponential basis set , J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, 1959 (2002)

    1959

  49. [49]

    R. J. Drachman, A new global operator for two-particle delta functions , J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 14, 2733 (1981)

    1981

  50. [50]

    Pachucki and J

    K. Pachucki and J. Komasa, Relativistic and QED correc- tions for the beryllium atom , Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 213001 (2004)

    2004

  51. [51]

    G. W. F. Drake, Unified relativistic theory for 1s2p 3P1 - 1s2 1 S0 and 1s2p 1P1 - 1s 2 1 S0 frequencies and transition rates in heliumlike ions , Phys. Rev. A 19, 1387 (1979)

    1979

  52. [52]

    G. W. Drake, Theoretical energies for the n = 1 and 2 states of the helium isoelectronic sequence up to Z = 100 , Can. J. Phys. 66, 586 (1988)

    1988

  53. [53]

    Yelkhovsky, QED corrections to singlet levels of the helium atom: A complete set of effective operators to mα6, Phys

    A. Yelkhovsky, QED corrections to singlet levels of the helium atom: A complete set of effective operators to mα6, Phys. Rev. A 64, 062104 (2001)

    2001

  54. [54]

    Pachucki, α4R corrections to singlet states of helium , Phys

    K. Pachucki, α4R corrections to singlet states of helium , Phys. Rev. A 74, 022512 (2006)

    2006

  55. [55]

    G. W. F. Drake, QED effects in helium and compar- isons with high precision experiment , Phys. Scr. 2001, 22 (2001)

    2001

  56. [56]

    V. I. Korobov, Bethe logarithm for the helium atom , Phys. Rev. A 100, 012517 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    G. W. F. Drake, I. B. Khriplovich, A. I. Milstein, and A. S. Yelkhovsky, Energy corrections of order mc2α6lnα in helium , Phys. Rev. A 48, R15 (1993)

    1993

  58. [58]

    Salman and J.-P

    M. Salman and J.-P. Karr, Photodetachment energy of negative hydrogen ions , arXiv:2601.04341 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    G. B. Clausen, Precision spectroscopy in 3He and 4He: Rydberg states and ionization energies , Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    Wu and L.-B

    M.-H. Wu and L.-B. Wang, Two-photon spectroscopy of helium 2 3S1-8 3D1,2,3 transitions at 544 nm with a 1.2 w compact laser system , Appl. Phys. B 130, 12 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Wu and L.-B

    M.-H. Wu and L.-B. Wang, Frequency measurement of the 2 3S1–8 3D1 two-photon transition in atomic 4He, Phys. Rev. A 111, 052809 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    G. W. F. Drake, Quantum defect theory and analysis of high-precision helium term energies , Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32, 93 (1994)

    1994

  63. [63]

    G. W. F. Drake and A. T. Bondy, Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: quantum defect extensions and compar- ison with experiment up to n = 102 for the singlet and triplet P-states , arXiv:2606.00814 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026