pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00814 · v1 · pith:XXOTQQI4new · submitted 2026-05-30 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: quantum defect extensions and comparison with experiment up to n = 102 for the singlet and triplet P-states

G. W. F. Drake , Aaron T. Bondy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 17:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords helium Rydberg statesquantum defect theoryionization energyP-statesvariational calculationsQED correctionsmass polarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Variational calculations extend quantum defect theory to confirm a 9σ discrepancy in the helium 1s2s triplet S ionization energy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors use high-precision Hylleraas variational calculations to derive quantum defect expansions for nonrelativistic energies of helium P-states and 1/n expansions for relativistic and QED corrections. These expansions, fitted to direct results up to n=35, are extrapolated to obtain ionization energies up to n=102 with sub-kHz accuracy. Combining the theoretical values with 28 experimental transition frequencies determines the ionization energy of the 1s2s ^3S1 state as 1152842742.705(16) MHz. This result differs from independent theoretical predictions by 0.474(52) MHz, confirming a previous 9σ disagreement obtained from quantum defect extrapolation of experimental data alone. The analysis also justifies the effective reduced-mass Rydberg model and verifies the Ritz expansion to 20 figures.

Core claim

High precision variational calculations for helium in Hylleraas coordinates are used to obtain a combination of quantum defect expansions for the nonrelativistic energy and 1/n expansions for the relativistic and QED corrections. The extrapolations based on direct calculations for the singlet and triplet P-states up to n=35 provide ionization energies up to n=102 with accuracies better than ±1 kHz. The calculated ionization energies are combined with 28 measured transition frequencies to obtain the ionization energy of the 1s2s ^3S1 state as 1152842742.705(16) MHz, differing from theory by 0.474±0.052 MHz and confirming the 9σ disagreement.

What carries the argument

Quantum defect expansions for nonrelativistic energy combined with 1/n expansions for relativistic and QED corrections, fitted to variational calculations up to n=35 and extrapolated to higher n.

If this is right

  • The nonrelativistic part justifies the effective reduced-mass Rydberg R_M^{(+)} model.
  • Second-order mass polarization terms vary as 1/n^2 in lowest order.
  • The Ritz expansion for the nonrelativistic energy holds to 20-figure accuracy.
  • Experimental and theoretical values for the 1s2s ^3S1 ionization energy disagree at the 9 sigma level.
  • The method allows precise predictions for high-n Rydberg states without direct computation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the discrepancy persists, it may indicate incomplete QED corrections in the theoretical ionization energy.
  • Similar quantum defect extensions could resolve discrepancies in other atomic systems.
  • Direct high-n calculations could test the extrapolation accuracy beyond n=35.
  • The confirmation suggests the need for re-examination of experimental systematics in transition frequency measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The fitted quantum defect and 1/n expansions remain accurate to better than 1 kHz when extrapolated from n=35 to n=102 without unaccounted higher-order terms.

What would settle it

A new measurement of the 1s2s ^3S1 ionization energy with uncertainty below 0.05 MHz that matches the theoretical value instead of the extrapolated experimental one.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.00814 by Aaron T. Bondy, G. W. F. Drake.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Ionization energy of the 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High precision variational calculations for helium in Hylleraas coordinates are used to obtain a combination of quantum defect expansions for the nonrelativistic energy and $1/n$ expansions for the relativistic and quantum electrodynamic (QED) corrections. The extrapolations based on direct calculations for the singlet and triplet $P$-states up to principal quantum number $n = 35$ provide ionization energies of the $1snp\;^1P_1$ and $^3P_c$ (centroid) states up to $n=102$ with accuracies better than $\pm$1 kHz. The calculated ionization energies are combined with 28 measured transition frequencies to obtain values for the ionization energy of the $1s2s\;^3S_1$ state. The final result of 1152 842 742.705(16) MHz differs from theory by $0.474\pm 0.052$ MHz, and provides a strong confirmation of the 9$\sigma$ disagreement between theory and experiment obtained previously by quantum defect extrapolation of experimental data to the series limit. An analysis of the quantum defect method is presented, and second-order mass polarization (recoil) terms are identified that vary as $1/n^2$ in lowest order. The nonrelativistic part provides a theoretical justification for the effective reduced-mass Rydberg $R_M^{(+)}$ based on the phenomenological model of a Rydberg electron scattering from a He$^+$ core. The Ritz expansion for the nonrelativistic energy is verified to an unprecedented 20-figure accuracy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses high-precision variational Hylleraas calculations for helium singlet and triplet P-states up to n=35 to construct quantum defect expansions for the nonrelativistic energies and separate 1/n expansions for the relativistic and QED corrections. These expansions are extrapolated to n=102, yielding ionization energies claimed accurate to better than ±1 kHz. The theoretical values are combined with 28 measured transition frequencies to extract the ionization energy of the 1s2s ^3S1 state as 1152842742.705(16) MHz, which differs from theory by 0.474(52) MHz and confirms a prior 9σ discrepancy. The work also presents an analysis of the quantum defect method, identifies 1/n² recoil terms, justifies the effective reduced-mass Rydberg constant R_M^(+), and verifies the nonrelativistic Ritz expansion to 20-figure accuracy.

Significance. If the claimed extrapolation accuracy holds, the result supplies an independent route to the low-lying ionization energy that strengthens evidence for a theory-experiment discrepancy in helium. The 20-figure verification of the Ritz expansion and the explicit identification of second-order mass-polarization terms constitute clear technical advances that would be of lasting value to the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and the section describing the 1/n expansions] Abstract and the section describing the 1/n expansions: the central claim that ionization energies at n=102 are known to ≲1 kHz (required to reach 16 kHz uncertainty on the 1s2s ^3S1 ionization energy) rests on relativistic/QED 1/n expansions fitted only to direct calculations up to n=35. No explicit convergence test, bound on omitted higher-order coefficients, or check for possible breakdown of the effective reduced-mass model beyond the identified 1/n² recoil terms is supplied; the quoted ±1 kHz figure therefore remains an internal fit uncertainty rather than a validated extrapolation error.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the final result 'provides a strong confirmation' of the 9σ disagreement; a brief quantitative statement of how the new error budget compares with the previous quantum-defect extrapolation would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting both its strengths and the need for stronger validation of the extrapolation uncertainties. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and the section describing the 1/n expansions: the central claim that ionization energies at n=102 are known to ≲1 kHz (required to reach 16 kHz uncertainty on the 1s2s ^3S1 ionization energy) rests on relativistic/QED 1/n expansions fitted only to direct calculations up to n=35. No explicit convergence test, bound on omitted higher-order coefficients, or check for possible breakdown of the effective reduced-mass model beyond the identified 1/n² recoil terms is supplied; the quoted ±1 kHz figure therefore remains an internal fit uncertainty rather than a validated extrapolation error.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript as submitted does not supply explicit convergence tests, bounds on omitted coefficients, or a dedicated check on the reduced-mass model at high n. In the revised version we will add (i) a table and accompanying text showing the variation of the n=102 extrapolated values when the number of fitted 1/n^k terms is changed from 3 to 5 and when the fitting range is restricted to n=20–35 versus n=15–35; (ii) an estimate of the truncation error obtained by taking the last included coefficient divided by the appropriate power of 35 and scaling to n=102; and (iii) a short paragraph quantifying the size of the identified 1/n² recoil corrections at n=102 relative to the 1 kHz target and arguing that higher-order recoil contributions remain negligible on the basis of the same asymptotic analysis already used for the leading terms. These additions will replace the internal-fit uncertainty with a documented extrapolation error. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper derives high-n ionization energies from variational Hylleraas calculations up to n=35 fitted to quantum defect and 1/n expansions, then combines the extrapolations with 28 external measured transition frequencies to extract the 1s2s ^3S1 ionization energy. This is compared to prior theory (not the paper's own fitted values). The abstract states the nonrelativistic Ritz expansion reaches 20-figure accuracy via direct verification, and the effective reduced-mass model receives theoretical justification from identified recoil terms. No equation or step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, and no load-bearing premise rests solely on overlapping-author self-citation. The work is self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central numerical results rest on the validity of quantum defect and 1/n expansions for extrapolation and on the accuracy of the 28 experimental transition frequencies used to anchor the lower-state energy; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum defect expansions and 1/n expansions derived from n≤35 calculations remain accurate to kHz level at n=102
    Invoked explicitly for the extrapolation procedure and accuracy claims in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5838 in / 1322 out tokens · 27448 ms · 2026-06-28T17:36:32.217765+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ionization energies for Rydberg $^4 \mathrm{He}$ ($1snp\,^{1,3}P$) states using the correlated B-spline basis function method

    physics.atom-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    C-BSBF calculations yield kHz-accurate ionization energies for helium Rydberg states n=24-35 and derived 2^1S/2^3S values of 960332040.533(10)stat(20)sys MHz and 1152842742.7274(53)stat(25)sys MHz, with cross-validati...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (approximately 70 decimal digits) is used. A com- plete calculation for the largest 8588-term basis set in dq precision takes approximately 20 hours on a workstation with a single cpu, including the calculation of derivatives ∂E/∂α p etc. III. RELA TIVISTIC AND QED CORRECTIONS the next step is to calculate the relativistic and QED corrections as expectati...

  2. [2]

    Ritz defect

    or Korobov [29]. For ∆E(3) L,2, theQterm is defined by the improper in- tegral Q= 1 4π lim ϵ→0 ⟨r−3 12 (ϵ) + 4π(γ+ lnϵ)δ(r 12)⟩(17) whereϵis the radius of an infinitesimal sphere that is excluded from the range of integration, andγis Euler’s constant. Contributions of orderα 4 Ry have been calculated in their entirety for the 2 1P1 state by Pachucki et al...

    2065

  3. [3]

    This extends the results obtained previously up to n= 35 [11], and raises the final result slightly from 1 152 842 742.7247(78)stat(25)sys to 1152 842 742.727(11) n E−1 152 842 742MHz 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p...

  4. [4]

    The discrepancy is particularly puzzling since it is almost the same for the case of 3He [48], and it is not apparent in the 2 3S1 −2 1S0 isotope shift [15, 49]

    of 0.474±0.052 MHz, wth experiment lying lower than theory. The discrepancy is particularly puzzling since it is almost the same for the case of 3He [48], and it is not apparent in the 2 3S1 −2 1S0 isotope shift [15, 49]. It therefore does not depend on the particular isotope or neutron number. In the absence of errors on the theoret- ical side, or unexpe...

  5. [5]

    Clausen, P

    G. Clausen, P. Jansen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Ionization energy of the metastable 2 1S0 state of 4He from Rydberg-series ex- trapolation, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 093001 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Clausen, K

    G. Clausen, K. Gamlin, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology in a two-electron atom: The ionization energy of metastable triplet helium (2 3S1), Phys. Rev. A111, 012817 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Pachucki, V

    K. Pachucki, V. Patk´ os, and V. A. Yerokhin, Testing fundamental interactions on the helium atom, Phys. Rev. A95, 062510 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Patk´ oˇ s, V.A

    V. Patk´ oˇ s, V.A. Yerokhin and K. Pachucki, Complete mα7 Lamb shift of helium triplet states, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042809 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Yan and G

    Z.-C. Yan and G. W. F. Drake, High Precision Calcula- tion of Fine Structure Splittings in Helium and He-Like Ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4791 (1995)

    1995

  10. [10]

    Pachucki, V

    K. Pachucki, V. A. Yerokhin, and P. Cancio Pastor, Quantum electrodynamic calculation of the hyperfine structure of 3He, Phys. Rev. A85, 042517 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    Pachucki and V

    K. Pachucki and V. A. Yerokhin, Fine Structure of He- liumlike Ions and Determination of the Fine Structure Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 070403 (2010)

    2010

  12. [12]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. R. Sun, J.-J. Chen, W. Jiang, K. Pachucki, and S.-M. Hu, Laser Spectroscopy of the Fine-Structure Splitting in the 2 3PJ Levels of 4He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 063001 (2017)

    2017

  13. [13]

    K. Kato, T. D. G. Skinner, and E. A. Hessels, Ultrahigh- Precision Measurement of then= 2 TripletP J Fine Structure of Atomic Helium Using Frequency-Offset Sep- arated Oscillatory Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 143002 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    A. T. Bondy, G. W. F. Drake, C. Mcleod, E. M. R. Pet- rimoulx, X.-Q. Qi, Z.-X. Zhong, Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: Comparison with experiment for the 1s24p 1P1 state (n= 24), Phys. Rev. A111, L010803 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    G. W. F. Drake, A. T. Bondy, O. P. Hallett, and B. C. Najem, Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: Results for 2≤n≤35 and comparison with experiments for the singlet and triplet P states, Phys. Rev. A113, 012810 (2026)

    2026

  16. [16]

    J. Chi, H. Fang, Y.-H. Zhang, X.-Q. Qi, L.-Y. Tang and T.-Y. Shi, Accurate Nonrelativistic Energy Calculations for Helium 1snp 1,3P(n= 2to27) States via Correlated B-Spline Basis Functions, Atoms13, 72 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    H. Fang, J. Chi,X.-Q. Qi, Y. H. Zhang, L.-Y. Tang, and T.-Y. Shi, Precise ab initio calculations of4He (1snp 3PJ) fine structure of high Rydberg states Phys. Rev. A113, 012812 (2026)

    2026

  18. [18]

    R. J. Rengelink, Y. van der Werf, R. P. M. J. W. Noter- mans, R. Jannin, K. S. E. Eikema, M. D. Hoogerland, 12 TABLE IX. 1/n t expansion coefficientsc(X) t for the spin-independent matrix elements needed to calculate the relativistic and QED contributions to the energy for the 1snp 1Pand 1snp3Pstates of helium, and corresponding mass polarization coeffici...

    1921

  19. [19]

    Steinebach, J

    K. Steinebach, J. C. J. Koelemeij, H. L. Bethlem, and K. S. E. Eikema, Spectroscopy of 4He at 0.25 ppt Uncer- tainty and Improved Alpha-Helion Charge-Radius Differ- ence Determination, arXiv: 2601.19444 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Quantum defect theory and analysis of high precision helium term energies,

    G. W. F. Drake, “Quantum defect theory and analysis of high precision helium term energies,” inAdvances in Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics(Academic Press,

  21. [21]

    G. W. F. Drake and Z.-C. Yan, Energies and relativistic corrections for the Rydberg states of helium: Variational results and asymptotic analysis, Phys. Rev. A,46, 2378 (1992)

    1992

  22. [22]

    G. W. F. Drake, New variational techniques for the 1snd states of helium, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1549 (1987)

    1987

  23. [23]

    G. W. F. Drake and A. J. Makowski, High Precision eigenvalues for the 1s2p 1Pand 3Pstates of helium, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B,5, 2207 (1988)

    1988

  24. [24]

    P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, B. N. Taylor, and E. Tiesinga, Codata recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 025002 (2025)

    2022

  25. [25]

    DQFUN: A double-quad precision pack- age with special functions, Available from https://www.davidhbailey.com/dhbsoftware/README- dqfun.txt [accessed: 2010-09-30]

    2010

  26. [26]

    H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter,Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms, (Springer, New York, 1957), p. 181

    1957

  27. [27]

    A. P. Stone, Proc. Phys. Soc.77, 786 (1961);81, 868 (1963)

    1961

  28. [28]

    P. K. Kabir and E. E. Salpeter, Radiative Corrections to the Ground-State Energy of the Helium Atom, Phys. Rev.108, 1256 (1957)

    1957

  29. [29]

    Araki, Quantum-Electrodynamical Corrections to Energy-Levels of Helium, Prog

    H. Araki, Quantum-Electrodynamical Corrections to Energy-Levels of Helium, Prog. Theo. Phys.17, 619 (1957)

    1957

  30. [30]

    Sucher, Energy Levels of the Two-Electron Atom to Orderα 3 Ry; Ionization Energy of Helium Phys

    J. Sucher, Energy Levels of the Two-Electron Atom to Orderα 3 Ry; Ionization Energy of Helium Phys. Rev. 109, 1010 (1958)

    1958

  31. [31]

    Yan and G

    Z.-C. Yan and G. W. F. Drake, Bethe Logarithm and QED Shift for Lithium, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 113004 (2003)

    2003

  32. [32]

    Pachucki and J

    K. Pachucki and J. Komasa, Relativistic and QED Cor- rections for the Beryllium Atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 213001 (2004)

    2004

  33. [33]

    V. I. Korobov, Bethe logarithm for the helium atom, Phys. Rev. A100, 012517 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Lesiuk and J

    M. Lesiuk and J. Lang, Atomic Bethe logarithm in the 13 TABLE X. 1/n t expansion coefficientsc(X) t for the spin- dependent matrix elements needed to calculate the relativis- tic contributions to the energy for the 1snp 3Pstates of he- lium, and correspondingµ/Mmass polarization coefficients c(X) (1) t . Units areα 2 atomic units. t c(H so)c(H soo)c(H ss)...

    2023

  35. [35]

    G. W. F. Drake, QED Effects in Helium and Compar- isons with High Precision Experiment, Phys. Scr.T95, 22 (2001)

    2001

  36. [36]

    Pachucki, V

    K. Pachucki, V. Lensky, F. Hagelstein, S. S. L. Muli, S. Bacca, and R. Pohl, Comprehensive theory of the Lamb shift in light muonic atoms Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015001 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Further tables of matrix elements for alln Pstates of helium with 2≤n≤35 are available at DOI: 10.5061/dryad.cjsxksnkv

    work page doi:10.5061/dryad.cjsxksnkv

  38. [38]

    Edl´ en, Atomic spectra, inEncyclopedia of Physics,27, 80 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1964)

    B. Edl´ en, Atomic spectra, inEncyclopedia of Physics,27, 80 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1964)

    1964

  39. [39]

    M. J. Seaton, Quantum Defect Theory, Rep. Prog. Phys. 46, 167 (1983)

    1983

  40. [40]

    Jungen, Elements of Quantum Defect Theory, in Handbook of High-resolution Spectroscopy, Edited by M

    C. Jungen, Elements of Quantum Defect Theory, in Handbook of High-resolution Spectroscopy, Edited by M. Quack and F. Merkt, (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chich- ester, UK., 2011)

    2011

  41. [41]

    D. R. Hartree, The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a non-Coulomb Central Field. Part III. Term Values and Intensities in Series in Optical Spectra, Cambridge Phi- los. Soc.,24, 426 (1028)

  42. [42]

    R. M. Langer, A Generalization of the Rydberg Formula, Phys. Rev.35, 649 (1930)

    1930

  43. [43]

    G. W. F. Drake, Quantum Defect Theory and Analysis of High-Precision Helium Term Energies, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.32, 93 (1994)

    1994

  44. [44]

    M. J. Seaton, Quantum defect theory II: Illustrative one- channel and two-channel problems, Proc. Phys. Soc.88, 815 (1966)

    1966

  45. [45]

    G. W. F. Drake and R. A. Swainson, Quantum defects and the 1/ndependence of Rydberg energies: Second- order polarization effects, Phys. Rev. A44, 5448 (1991)

    1991

  46. [46]

    W. R. Johnson and K. T. Cheng, Quantum defects for highly stripped ions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.12, 863 (1979)

    1979

  47. [47]

    D. M. Jacobs, Relativistic Ritz approach to hydrogenlike atoms: Theoretical considerations, Phys. Rev. A106, 062810 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    R. J. Drachman, Rydberg states of helium: Nuclear- recoil corrections, Phys. Rev. A33, 2780 (1986)

    1986

  49. [49]

    DISS. ETH NO. 31047 G. Clausen, Precision spec- troscopy in 3He and 4He: Rydberg states and ioniza- tion energies, Ph.D. Dissertation (ETH Zurich No. 31047, 2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Clausen and F

    G. Clausen and F. Merkt, private communication

  51. [51]

    Wu and L.-B

    M.-H. Wu and L.-B. Wang, Frequency measurement of the 2 3S18 3D1 two-photon transition in atomic 4He, Phys. Rev. A111, 052809 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Clausen and F

    G. Clausen and F. Merkt, Ionization Energy of Metastable 3He (2 3S1) and the Alpha- and Helion- Particle Charge-Radius Difference from Precision Spec- troscopy of thenpRydberg Series, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 223001 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    van der Werf, K

    Y. van der Werf, K. Steinebach, R. Jannin, H. L. Beth- lem, and K. S. E. Eikema, Alpha and helion parti- cle charge radius difference determined from quantum- degenerate helium, Science,388, 850, 854 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    L. Cong, F. Ficek, R. Abdullin, M. G. Kozlov, and D. Budker, Testing Exotic Electron Electron Interactions with the Helium Ionization-Energy Anomaly, Phys. Rev. A, submitted (1926)

    1926

  55. [55]

    V. A. Yerokhin, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and K. Pachucki, QEDmα7 effects for triplet states of heliumlike ions, Phys. Rev. A 107, 012810 (2023)

    2023

  56. [56]

    J. Chi, H. Fang, Y.-H. Zhang L.-Y. Tang, and T.-Y. Shi, Ionization energies for Rydberg 4He (1snp 1,3P) states using the correlated B-spline basis function method, Phys. Rev. A. submitted. 14 TABLE XI. Ionization energy of the 1s2s 1S0 state of 4He withI tot(2 1S0) =ν exp(2 1S0 −n 1P1) +I theo(n 1P1). The last column gives ˜Itot(2 3S1) obtained by adding ...

    1919