pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04826 · v1 · pith:FTZLSMBEnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Kinematic Riffs and Interference Effects in Triple Higgs Production in the N2HDM

Wrishik Naskar , Tania Robens , Julia Anabell Ziegler This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords triple Higgs productionN2HDMinterference effectskinematic distributionsresonant productionLHC phenomenologyextended Higgs sectorsCP-even scalars
0
0 comments X

The pith

Interference effects and extra decay channels reshape kinematic distributions in resonant triple Higgs production in the N2HDM.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies resonant production of three Higgs bosons at the LHC inside the N2HDM, a model with three CP-even neutral scalars. It examines invariant mass and transverse momentum distributions for the resonant topologies and shows that interference among production mechanisms plus additional open decay channels can change the shapes of these distributions. A reader would care because this means simplified calculations without full interference can miss or misrepresent signals when hunting for physics beyond the Standard Model in extended Higgs sectors. The central demonstration is that these effects are large enough to matter and that only fully differential analyses capture the correct kinematics.

Core claim

Within the N2HDM, resonant triple Higgs production proceeds through multiple topologies involving the three CP-even scalars. The invariant mass and transverse momentum spectra receive sizable modifications from interference between these channels and from decay modes that become kinematically allowed at LHC energies. These modifications expose the shortcomings of simplified approximations and establish that only fully differential calculations can reliably extract information about extended Higgs sectors.

What carries the argument

Resonant production topologies of three Higgs bosons and the interference among them in invariant-mass and transverse-momentum distributions.

If this is right

  • Invariant mass and transverse momentum distributions receive large corrections from interference and extra decay channels.
  • Simplified approximations that omit these effects produce misleading kinematic shapes.
  • Probes of extended Higgs sectors require fully differential simulations rather than factorized or narrow-width treatments.
  • Kinematic observables become more sensitive tools once interference is retained.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimental analyses of multi-Higgs final states at the LHC should incorporate full interference matrices to avoid incorrect exclusion limits.
  • Similar interference patterns may appear in other multi-scalar models and could be tested by reweighting existing Monte Carlo samples.
  • The result suggests that differential measurements in the four-boson or six-boson channels could provide independent constraints on the same parameter regions.

Load-bearing premise

Regions of N2HDM parameter space exist in which resonant triple Higgs topologies are kinematically open at LHC energies and standard perturbative calculations correctly include all interference.

What would settle it

A complete calculation that includes every interference term yet finds invariant-mass and transverse-momentum distributions unchanged from the simplified case, or the absence of any N2HDM points with accessible resonances, would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

We investigate the complex kinematic structure involved in resonant production of three Higgs bosons at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), within the rich scalar spectra of the Next-to-minimal Two Higgs Doublet Model (N2HDM), which features three CP-even neutral scalar degrees of freedom. Focussing on the resonant topologies, we analyse the invariant mass and transverse momentum distributions to disentangle the underlying production mechanisms. We demonstrate that interference effects and additional kinematically accessible decay channels can significantly alter kinematic observables, highlighting the limitations of simplified approximations and underscoring the importance of fully differential studies for probing extended Higgs sectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates resonant triple Higgs production at the LHC in the N2HDM, which contains three CP-even neutral scalars. Focusing on resonant topologies, it analyzes invariant mass and transverse momentum distributions to identify underlying production mechanisms. The central claim is that interference effects between channels and the opening of additional kinematically accessible decay modes substantially modify these observables relative to simplified approximations, underscoring the need for fully differential studies in extended Higgs sectors.

Significance. If the explicit demonstrations hold, the work provides concrete evidence that interference and full decay chains must be retained in LHC phenomenology of multi-Higgs final states, rather than relying on decoupled or approximate treatments. The use of standard tree-level perturbative matrix elements for benchmark points that satisfy kinematic thresholds is a clear strength, enabling direct, falsifiable comparison of topologies without parameter fitting or circular definitions.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Benchmark selection): the text would benefit from an explicit table listing the chosen N2HDM masses, mixings, and couplings for the resonant points, rather than describing them only in prose.
  2. [Figure 5] Figure 5 (pT distributions): the y-axis scale and legend overlap in the interference panel, reducing readability; a larger font or inset would help.
  3. [Eq. (8)] Eq. (8) (matrix-element definition): the notation for the interference term is introduced without a preceding sentence clarifying its sign convention relative to the individual amplitudes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript on resonant triple Higgs production in the N2HDM and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper performs a standard phenomenological simulation of resonant triple Higgs production in the N2HDM using tree-level perturbative matrix elements for the relevant 2→3 and decay topologies. Kinematic distributions and interference effects are computed explicitly for benchmark points satisfying kinematic thresholds; these outputs do not reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim is an explicit demonstration via differential observables and is self-contained against conventional LHC phenomenology benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the N2HDM scalar sector, which introduces multiple free parameters for masses, mixings, and couplings that must be chosen or scanned to realize resonant production; standard collider simulation assumptions are also used.

free parameters (1)
  • N2HDM scalar masses, mixings, and couplings
    These parameters are selected to enable resonant topologies and are not derived from first principles in the paper.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard perturbative QCD and electroweak calculations for Higgs production cross sections
    Invoked implicitly for computing distributions and interference in the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5633 in / 1223 out tokens · 35150 ms · 2026-06-28T05:35:02.685285+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aad et al.,Search for nonresonant pair production of Higgs bosons in the b¯bb¯b final state in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for nonresonant pair production of Higgs bosons in the b¯bb¯b final state in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 052003, [2301.03212]. [2]CMScollaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final state with two bottom quarks and two tau ...

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Chen, Q.-S

    C.-Y. Chen, Q.-S. Yan, X. Zhao, Y.-M. Zhong and Z. Zhao,Probing triple-Higgs productions via 4b2γdecay channel at a 100 TeV hadron collider,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 013007, [1510.04013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Papaefstathiou and K

    A. Papaefstathiou and K. Sakurai,Triple Higgs boson production at a 100 TeV proton-proton collider,JHEP02(2016) 006, [1508.06524]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Papaefstathiou, G

    A. Papaefstathiou, G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi and M. Zaro,Triple Higgs boson production to six b-jets at a 100 TeV proton collider,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 947, [1909.09166]. – 20 –

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Papaefstathiou, T

    A. Papaefstathiou, T. Robens and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi,Triple Higgs Boson Production at the Large Hadron Collider with Two Real Singlet Scalars,JHEP05(2021) 193, [ 2101.00037]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Papaefstathiou and G

    A. Papaefstathiou and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi,Multi-Higgs boson production with anomalous interactions at current and future proton colliders,JHEP06(2024) 124, [2312.13562]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Karkout, A

    O. Karkout, A. Papaefstathiou, M. Postma, G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, J. van de Vis and T. du Pree,Triple Higgs boson production and electroweak phase transition in the two-real-singlet model,JHEP11(2024) 077, [2404.12425]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Stylianou and G

    P. Stylianou and G. Weiglein,Constraints on the trilinear and quartic Higgs couplings from triple Higgs production at the LHC and beyond,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 366, [ 2312.04646]

    arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    B. Fuks, J. H. Kim and S. J. Lee,Scrutinizing the Higgs quartic coupling at a future 100 TeV proton–proton collider with taus and b-jets,Phys. Lett. B771(2017) 354–358, [1704.04298]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Kilian, S

    W. Kilian, S. Sun, Q.-S. Yan, X. Zhao and Z. Zhao,New Physics in multi-Higgs boson final states,JHEP06(2017) 145, [1702.03554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    S. D. Lane, I. M. Lewis and M. Sullivan,Resonant multiscalar production in the generic complex singlet model in the multi-TeV region,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 055017, [ 2403.18003]

    arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Papaefstathiou and G

    A. Papaefstathiou and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi,Triple Higgs Boson Production with Two Heavy Scalars at the LHC via a Simplified Approach,2501.14866. [14]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for triple Higgs boson production in the 6b final state using pp collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 032006, [2411.02040]

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Domenech, C

    Anisha, D. Domenech, C. Englert, M. J. Herrero and R. A. Morales,Bosonic multi-Higgs correlations beyond leading order,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 095016, [2405.05385]

    arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Domenech, C

    Anisha, D. Domenech, C. Englert, M. J. Herrero and R. A. Morales,HEFT’s appraisal of triple (versus double) Higgs weak boson fusion,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 055004, [ 2407.20706]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Biermann, C

    L. Biermann, C. Borschensky, C. Englert, M. M¨ uhlleitner and W. Naskar,Double and triple Higgs boson production to probe the electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 095012, [2408.08043]

    arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    CMS,Search for nonresonant triple Higgs boson production in the six b-quark final state in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13TeV,CMS-PAS-HIG-24-012

  17. [17]

    Chiang, F.-Y

    C.-W. Chiang, F.-Y. Hsieh, S.-C. Hsu, Z.-Z. Li and I. Low,Enhancing the sensitivity for triple Higgs boson searches with deep learning techniques,JHEP03(2026) 261, [2510.01672]

    arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Z. Dong, X. Sun, B. Guo, L. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Wang et al.,Probing triple Higgs production via 4τ2b decay channel at a 100 TeV hadron collider,JHEP08(2025) 040, [2504.04037]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Aad et al.,Highlights of the HL-LHC physics projections by ATLAS and CMS,2504.00672

    ATLAS, CMScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Highlights of the HL-LHC physics projections by ATLAS and CMS,2504.00672

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    ATLAS,HL-LHC prospects for the measurement of triple-Higgs production in the 6b final state at the ATLAS experiment,ATL-PHYS-PUB-2025-003

    2025

  21. [21]

    Abouabid et al.,HHH whitepaper,Eur

    H. Abouabid et al.,HHH whitepaper,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1183, [2407.03015]

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    – 21 – [25]CMScollaboration, A

    CMS,Search for triple Higgs production in Run2 data of CMS using 4b2gamma final state., CMS-PAS-HIG-24-015. – 21 – [25]CMScollaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al.,Combination of searches for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,2510.07527

    arXiv

  23. [23]

    de Florian, I

    D. de Florian, I. Fabre and J. Mazzitelli,Triple Higgs production at hadron colliders at NNLO in QCD,JHEP03(2020) 155, [1912.02760]

    arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Ding et al.,Constraining the Higgs potential using multi-Higgs production,2601.13248

    J.-L. Ding et al.,Constraining the Higgs potential using multi-Higgs production,2601.13248

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Robens and R

    T. Robens and R. Santos,BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors,2507.21910

    arXiv

  26. [26]

    Samarakoon and T

    B. Samarakoon and T. M. Figy,Triple Higgs Production at Muon Colliders in the Higgs Triplet Model,2503.05923

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    Robens, T

    T. Robens, T. Stefaniak and J. Wittbrodt,Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 151, [1908.08554]

    arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    D. A. Dicus, C. Kao and W. W. Repko,Self Coupling of the Higgs boson in the processes p p→ZHHH + X and p p→W HHH + X,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 113003, [ 1602.05849]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    Agrawal, D

    P. Agrawal, D. Saha and A. Shivaji,Production of HHH and HHV (V = γ, Z)at the hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 036006, [1708.03580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Liu, K.-F

    T. Liu, K.-F. Lyu, J. Ren and H. X. Zhu,Probing the quartic Higgs boson self-interaction, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 093004, [1803.04359]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Kilian, S

    W. Kilian, S. Sun, Q.-S. Yan, X. Zhao and Z. Zhao,Multi-Higgs boson production and unitarity in vector-boson fusion at future hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 076012, [1808.05534]

    arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Chang and M

    S. Chang and M. A. Luty,The Higgs Trilinear Coupling and the Scale of New Physics,JHEP 03(2020) 140, [1902.05556]

    arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Abdughani, D

    M. Abdughani, D. Wang, L. Wu, J. M. Yang and J. Zhao,Probing the triple Higgs boson coupling with machine learning at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 056003, [2005.11086]

    arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Chiesa, F

    M. Chiesa, F. Maltoni, L. Mantani, B. Mele, F. Piccinini and X. Zhao,Measuring the quartic Higgs self-coupling at a multi-TeV muon collider,JHEP09(2020) 098, [2003.13628]

    arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Haisch and G

    U. Haisch and G. Koole,Off-shell Higgs production at the LHC as a probe of the trilinear Higgs coupling,JHEP02(2022) 030, [2111.12589]

    arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Chiesa, B

    M. Chiesa, B. Mele and F. Piccinini,Multi Higgs production via photon fusion at future multi-TeV muon colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 543, [2109.10109]

    arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Dermisek, K

    R. Dermisek, K. Hermanek and N. McGinnis,Di-Higgs and tri-Higgs boson signals of muon g-2 at a muon collider,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L091301, [2108.10950]

    arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    B. Fuks, A. Papaefstathiou and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi,Extracting Higgs self-coupling constraints through triple Higgs boson production at future hadron colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C 85(2025) 1309, [2509.16364]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Weinberg,Phenomenological Lagrangians,Physica A96(1979) 327–340

    S. Weinberg,Phenomenological Lagrangians,Physica A96(1979) 327–340

    1979

  40. [40]

    Brivio and M

    I. Brivio and M. Trott,The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory,Phys. Rept.793 (2019) 1–98, [1706.08945]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Grzadkowski, M

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085, [1008.4884]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    Aebischer, A

    J. Aebischer, A. J. Buras and J. Kumar,SMEFT ATLAS: The Landscape Beyond the Standard Model,2507.05926. – 22 –

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Alonso, E

    R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar,A Geometric Formulation of Higgs Effective Field Theory: Measuring the Curvature of Scalar Field Space,Phys. Lett. B754(2016) 335–342, [1511.00724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Buchalla and O

    G. Buchalla and O. Cata,Effective Theory of a Dynamically Broken Electroweak Standard Model at NLO,JHEP07(2012) 101, [1203.6510]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [45]

    Buchalla, O

    G. Buchalla, O. Cat` a and C. Krause,Complete Electroweak Chiral Lagrangian with a Light Higgs at NLO,Nucl. Phys. B880(2014) 552–573, [1307.5017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    Buchalla, O

    G. Buchalla, O. Cata, A. Celis, M. Knecht and C. Krause,Complete One-Loop Renormalization of the Higgs-Electroweak Chiral Lagrangian,Nucl. Phys. B928(2018) 93–106, [1710.06412]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Brivio, J

    I. Brivio, J. Gonzalez-Fraile, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and L. Merlo,The complete HEFT Lagrangian after the LHC Run I,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 416, [1604.06801]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    M. J. Herrero and R. A. Morales,One-loop renormalization of vector boson scattering with the electroweak chiral Lagrangian in covariant gauges,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 075013, [2107.07890]

    arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    M. J. Herrero and R. A. Morales,One-loop corrections for WW to HH in Higgs EFT with the electroweak chiral Lagrangian,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 073008, [2208.05900]

    arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Alonso, E

    R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar,Geometry of the Scalar Sector,JHEP08(2016) 101, [1605.03602]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Cohen, N

    T. Cohen, N. Craig, X. Lu and D. Sutherland,Is SMEFT Enough?,JHEP03(2021) 237, [2008.08597]

    arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Sun, M.-L

    H. Sun, M.-L. Xiao and J.-H. Yu,Complete NLO operators in the Higgs effective field theory, JHEP05(2023) 043, [2206.07722]

    arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Brivio, R

    I. Brivio, R. Gr¨ ober and K. Schmid,The Art of Counting: a reappraisal of the HEFT expansion,2511.23410

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Asi´ ain, R

    ´I. Asi´ ain, R. Gr¨ ober and L. Tiberi,Is the Standard Model Effective Field Theory Enough for Higgs Pair Production?,2602.16288

    arXiv

  55. [55]

    Domenech, M

    D. Domenech, M. Herrero, R. A. Morales and A. Salas-Bern´ ardez,Matching HEFT and SMEFT in double and triple Higgs boson production from weak boson fusion,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 115022, [2506.21716]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Brivio, R

    I. Brivio, R. Gr¨ ober and K. Schmid,Higgs pair production in gluon fusion to higher orders in Higgs Effective Field Theory,2511.23411

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Haisch, A

    U. Haisch, A. Sankar and G. Zanderighi,A new probe of the quartic Higgs self-coupling, 2505.20463

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    Muhlleitner, M

    M. Muhlleitner, M. O. P. Sampaio, R. Santos and J. Wittbrodt,The N2HDM under Theoretical and Experimental Scrutiny,JHEP03(2017) 094, [1612.01309]

    arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Fontes, M

    D. Fontes, M. M¨ uhlleitner, J. C. Rom˜ ao, R. Santos, J. P. Silva and J. Wittbrodt,The C2HDM revisited,JHEP02(2018) 073, [1711.09419]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J. P. Silva,Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1–102, [1106.0034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    M¨ uhlleitner, M

    M. M¨ uhlleitner, M. O. P. Sampaio, R. Santos and J. Wittbrodt,Phenomenological Comparison of Models with Extended Higgs Sectors,JHEP08(2017) 132, [1703.07750]. – 23 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Wittbrodt,Phenomenological comparison of models with extended Higgs sectors, Master’s thesis, KIT, Karlsruhe, 9, 2016

    J. Wittbrodt,Phenomenological comparison of models with extended Higgs sectors, Master’s thesis, KIT, Karlsruhe, 9, 2016

    2016

  63. [63]

    Wittbrodt,Exploring Models of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking at the LHC and Beyond

    J. Wittbrodt,Exploring Models of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking at the LHC and Beyond. PhD thesis, Hamburg U., Hamburg, 2019. 10.3204/PUBDB-2019-03809

    work page doi:10.3204/pubdb-2019-03809 2019

  64. [64]

    Coimbra, M

    R. Coimbra, M. O. P. Sampaio and R. Santos,ScannerS: Constraining the phase diagram of a complex scalar singlet at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2428, [1301.2599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    M¨ uhlleitner, M

    M. M¨ uhlleitner, M. O. P. Sampaio, R. Santos and J. Wittbrodt,ScannerS: parameter scans in extended scalar sectors,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 198, [2007.02985]

    arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    P. M. Ferreira, J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber and R. Santos,Probing wrong-sign Yukawa couplings at the LHC and a future linear collider,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 115003, [1403.4736]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    H. Bahl, T. Biek¨ otter, S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, S. Paasch, G. Weiglein et al.,HiggsTools: BSM scalar phenomenology with new versions of HiggsBounds and HiggsSignals,Comput. Phys. Commun.291(2023) 108803, [2210.09332]

    arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Bechtle, O

    P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K. E. Williams,HiggsBounds: Confronting Arbitrary Higgs Sectors with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun.181(2010) 138–167, [0811.4169]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  69. [69]

    Bechtle, O

    P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein and K. E. Williams,HiggsBounds 2.0.0: Confronting Neutral and Charged Higgs Sector Predictions with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron,Comput. Phys. Commun.182(2011) 2605–2631, [1102.1898]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  70. [70]

    Bechtle, O

    P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein et al.,Recent Developments in HiggsBounds and a Preview of HiggsSignals,PoSCHARGED2012(2012) 024, [1301.2345]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  71. [71]

    Bechtle, O

    P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, O. St˚ al, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein et al.,HiggsBounds− 4: Improved Tests of Extended Higgs Sectors against Exclusion Bounds from LEP, the Tevatron and the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2693, [1311.0055]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Bechtle, S

    P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein,Applying Exclusion Likelihoods from LHC Searches to Extended Higgs Sectors,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 421, [1507.06706]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Bechtle, D

    P. Bechtle, D. Dercks, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein et al., HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1211, [2006.06007]

    arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    H. Bahl, V. M. Lozano, T. Stefaniak and J. Wittbrodt,Testing exotic scalars with HiggsBounds,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 584, [2109.10366]

    arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Bechtle, S

    P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. St˚ al, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein,HiggsSignals : Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 2711, [1305.1933]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  76. [76]

    St˚ al and T

    O. St˚ al and T. Stefaniak,Constraining extended Higgs sectors with HiggsSignals,PoS EPS-HEP2013(2013) 314, [1310.4039]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  77. [77]

    Bechtle, S

    P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. St˚ al, T. Stefaniak and G. Weiglein,Probing the Standard Model with Higgs signal rates from the Tevatron, the LHC and a future ILC,JHEP11(2014) 039, [1403.1582]. – 24 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  78. [78]

    Bechtle, S

    P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein and J. Wittbrodt, HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 145, [2012.09197]

    arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    W. G. Hollik, G. Weiglein and J. Wittbrodt,Impact of Vacuum Stability Constraints on the Phenomenology of Supersymmetric Models,JHEP03(2019) 109, [1812.04644]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    P. M. Ferreira, M. M¨ uhlleitner, R. Santos, G. Weiglein and J. Wittbrodt,Vacuum Instabilities in the N2HDM,JHEP09(2019) 006, [1905.10234]

    arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.