Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Symmetries of oscillators and their interactions alone fix which higher-order phase couplings are allowed.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-28 03:04 UTC pith:SOIQ3F3C

load-bearing objection The paper gives symmetry rules for allowed higher-order phase couplings from the oscillator velocity field and interaction symmetries alone, but the claim that this bypasses all constraints from the actual reduction map is the part that needs direct checking. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.04904 v1 pith:SOIQ3F3C submitted 2026-06-03 nlin.AO physics.soc-ph

Symmetry-based selection rules for higher-order interactions in coupled oscillators

Iv\'an L\'eon , Riccardo Muolo , Yuanzhao Zhang , Maxime Lucas This is my paper
classification nlin.AO physics.soc-ph
keywords higher-order interactionsphase reductioncoupled oscillatorsselection rulessymmetryKuramoto modelnonlinear oscillatorsphase coupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives selection rules that identify which higher-order phase coupling functions, such as terms like sin(-2θ_j + θ_k + θ_l), can appear in reduced models of coupled nonlinear oscillators. These rules rely exclusively on the symmetry properties of each isolated oscillator's velocity field and the n-body interaction functions, and they require no explicit phase reduction step. A reader would care because distinct higher-order couplings produce different collective dynamics, so the rules supply a direct way to choose the right terms when building phase models from physical systems. The work generalizes the justification that phase reduction provides for the standard pairwise Kuramoto model.

Core claim

Selection rules for higher-order phase coupling functions can be established without explicit phase reduction and depend only on the symmetry of the isolated oscillator velocity field and the n-body interaction functions. As phase reduction established the mechanistic basis for the Kuramoto model, these rules provide a theoretical link between physical systems and higher-order phase models.

What carries the argument

Symmetry-based selection rules for higher-order phase coupling functions, derived from the isolated oscillator velocity field and n-body interaction functions.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetries of the isolated oscillator velocity field and the n-body interaction functions are sufficient by themselves to determine all allowed higher-order phase couplings.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample would be a system whose measured symmetries forbid a particular higher-order coupling according to the rules, yet that coupling is observed in the reduced phase dynamics.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Only symmetry-permitted multi-phase sine terms appear in the reduced equations for a given oscillator and interaction symmetry.
  • Physical or biological oscillator networks can be mapped to specific higher-order phase models by inspecting symmetries alone.
  • The pairwise Kuramoto coupling sin(θ_k - θ_j) is recovered as the lowest-order case under the same symmetry logic.
  • Different symmetry classes of oscillators produce qualitatively distinct allowed sets of higher-order couplings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The rules could be applied to decide interaction terms in models of three-body coupled chemical or laser oscillators without performing reduction.
  • They open a route to classify entire families of higher-order Kuramoto models by symmetry group rather than by explicit calculation.
  • If the rules hold, they may extend to other reduction methods such as amplitude equations or averaging techniques.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to derive selection rules for which higher-order phase coupling functions (e.g., sin(−2θⱼ + θₖ + θₗ)) are permitted in phase-reduced models of coupled limit-cycle oscillators. These rules are asserted to follow solely from the symmetry group of the isolated oscillator velocity field F and the symmetry of the n-body interaction functions, and to be applicable without performing explicit phase reduction or averaging.

Significance. If the claimed equivalence holds, the result supplies a direct symmetry-based bridge from the underlying vector field and interaction structure to the admissible terms in higher-order phase models, analogous to the role phase reduction plays for the classical Kuramoto sine coupling. This would be useful for constructing minimal yet symmetry-consistent models of multi-body oscillator networks.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (derivation of the selection rules): the central assertion that the symmetry of F and the n-body functions alone determine all allowed phase couplings, with no further restrictions arising from the isochron projection or the averaging kernel, is not demonstrated. The reduction map can impose its own invariance properties (e.g., via the phase-response curve or the periodic orbit measure) that are not implied by the symmetry group of F; without an explicit argument or counter-example showing that these extra constraints are absent or redundant, the claim that the rules can be applied “without the need of explicit phase reduction” remains unsubstantiated.
  2. [§4] §4, application to the three-oscillator example: the verification that only the symmetry-allowed terms appear in the reduced equations is performed after reduction has already been carried out. This does not test the stronger claim that the same selection could have been made a priori from the symmetries of F and the interaction functions alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the symmetry group action on the phase variables is introduced without a clear statement of how the group elements act on the circle (additive or multiplicative).
  2. The abstract states that the rules are “solely based on the symmetry,” but the introduction does not cite prior work on symmetry methods in phase reduction (e.g., equivariant bifurcation theory) that would contextualize the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important points regarding the substantiation of our central claims, which we address point by point below. We maintain that the selection rules follow solely from the symmetries as stated, but we are prepared to clarify the derivation where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (derivation of the selection rules): the central assertion that the symmetry of F and the n-body functions alone determine all allowed phase couplings, with no further restrictions arising from the isochron projection or the averaging kernel, is not demonstrated. The reduction map can impose its own invariance properties (e.g., via the phase-response curve or the periodic orbit measure) that are not implied by the symmetry group of F; without an explicit argument or counter-example showing that these extra constraints are absent or redundant, the claim that the rules can be applied “without the need of explicit phase reduction” remains unsubstantiated.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The derivation in §3 proceeds by requiring that admissible phase coupling functions be invariant under the action of the symmetry group of F on the state space; because the isochrons are level sets of the phase function that is itself equivariant under this group action (as the periodic orbit and its neighborhood are preserved), the phase differences transform identically. Consequently, the isochron projection and the averaging measure (integration along the orbit) inherit the same invariance and introduce no independent constraints. A short additional paragraph can be inserted after the main derivation to spell out this equivariance explicitly, thereby addressing the concern without altering the result. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4, application to the three-oscillator example: the verification that only the symmetry-allowed terms appear in the reduced equations is performed after reduction has already been carried out. This does not test the stronger claim that the same selection could have been made a priori from the symmetries of F and the interaction functions alone.

    Authors: The three-oscillator example is presented after the general theory precisely to demonstrate consistency between the a-priori symmetry rules and the outcome of explicit reduction. The selection itself is performed in the text by inspecting only the symmetry group of F and the functional form of the three-body interaction; the subsequent reduction serves solely as an independent check. We can add one clarifying sentence at the beginning of §4 stating that the admissible terms were first identified from symmetry considerations alone, prior to any averaging calculation. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on external symmetry properties

full rationale

The paper's central claim establishes selection rules for higher-order phase couplings solely from the symmetry of the isolated oscillator velocity field F and the n-body interaction functions, without explicit phase reduction. No quoted steps reduce a prediction to a fitted input by construction, invoke self-citation as load-bearing uniqueness, or smuggle an ansatz via prior work. The abstract and description present the rules as derived from independent symmetry considerations that do not presuppose the target result, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text would be required to enumerate them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5694 in / 1030 out tokens · 32398 ms · 2026-06-28T03:04:43.621929+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Pairwise interactions among general nonlinear oscillators can be reduced, via phase reduction, to a Kuramoto-type phase coupling $\sin(- \theta_j+\theta_k )$. For higher-order interactions, multiple phase couplings exist -- such as $\sin(-2\theta_j+\theta_k+\theta_l )$ and $\sin(-\theta_j+2\theta_k-\theta_l)$. Since different nonpairwise coupling functions produce qualitatively different dynamics, it is important to understand which phase couplings should be included in coupled phase oscillator models. In this Letter, we establish selection rules for higher-order phase coupling functions. These selection rules, which can be applied without the need of explicit phase reduction, are solely based on the symmetry of the isolated oscillator velocity field and the $n$-body interaction functions. As phase reduction established the mechanistic basis for the Kuramoto model, our results provide a theoretical link between physical systems and higher-order phase models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04904 by Iv\'an L\'eon, Maxime Lucas, Riccardo Muolo, Yuanzhao Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Impact of Channel Dynamics on Higher-order Interactions of Oscillators

    nlin.AO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Standard 3-body Kuramoto couplings are mathematically equivalent to pairwise connections through latent transmission channels, and relaxing the adiabatic limit reveals symmetry-dependent bistability and finite-size cl...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths,Synchroniza- tion: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK)

  2. [2]

    Arenas, A

    A. Arenas, A. D´ ıaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks, Physics Reports469, 93 (2008)

    2008

  3. [3]

    Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H

    Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H. Araki (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1975) pp. 420– 422

    1975

  4. [4]

    Kuramoto,Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbu- lence, edited by H

    Y. Kuramoto,Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbu- lence, edited by H. Haken, Springer Series in Synergetics, Vol. 19 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1984)

    1984

  5. [5]

    Nakao, Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators, Contemporary Physics57, 188 (2016)

    H. Nakao, Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators, Contemporary Physics57, 188 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Pietras and A

    B. Pietras and A. Daffertshofer, Network dynamics of coupled oscillators and phase reduction techniques, Physics Reports Network Dynamics of Coupled Oscilla- tors and Phase Reduction Techniques,819, 1 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Monga, D

    B. Monga, D. Wilson, T. Matchen, and J. Moehlis, Phase reduction and phase-based optimal control for biologi- cal systems: a tutorial, Biological cybernetics113, 11 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Nakao, S

    H. Nakao, S. Yasui, M. Ota, K. Arai, and Y. Kawamura, Phase reduction and synchronization of a network of cou- pled dynamical elements exhibiting collective oscillations, Chaos28(2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Kuramoto and H

    Y. Kuramoto and H. Nakao, On the concept of dynamical reduction: the case of coupled oscillators, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A377, 20190041 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    M. H. Matheny, J. Emenheiser, W. Fon, A. Chapman, A. Salova, M. Rohden, J. Li, M. Hudoba de Badyn, M. P´ osfai, L. Duenas-Osorio, M. Mesbahi, J. P. Crutch- field, M. C. Cross, R. M. D’Souza, and M. L. Roukes, Exotic states in a simple network of nanoelectromechan- ical oscillators, Science363, eaav7932 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Battiston, G

    F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lu- cas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri, Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics, Physics Reports Networks beyond Pairwise Interactions: Structure and Dynamics,874, 1 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    Bianconi,Higher-Order Networks: An introduction to simplicial complexes(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2021)

    G. Bianconi,Higher-Order Networks: An introduction to simplicial complexes(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Battiston, E

    F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. Fer- raz de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. K´ efi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. M. Murray, T. P. Peixoto, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems, Nature Physics17, 1093 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Kuehn and C

    C. Kuehn and C. Bick, A universal route to explosive phenomena, Sci. Adv.7, eabe3824 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    C. Bick, E. Gross, H. A. Harrington, and M. T. Schaub, What are higher-order networks?, SIAM Rev.65, 686 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Boccaletti, P

    S. Boccaletti, P. De Lellis, C. Del Genio, K. Alfaro- Bittner, R. Criado, S. Jalan, and M. Romance, The struc- ture and dynamics of networks with higher order inter- actions, Phys. Rep.1018, 1 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Muolo, L

    R. Muolo, L. Giambagli, H. Nakao, D. Fanelli, and T. Carletti, Turing patterns on discrete topologies: from networks to higher-order structures, Proceedings of the Royal Society A480, 20240235 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Mill´ an, H

    A. Mill´ an, H. Sun, L. Giambagli, R. Muolo, T. Carletti, J. Torres, F. Radicchi, J. Kurths, and G. Bianconi, Topol- ogy shapes dynamics of higher-order networks, Nature Physics21, 353 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Tanaka and T

    T. Tanaka and T. Aoyagi, Multistable attractors in a network of phase oscillators with three-body interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 224101 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    P. S. Skardal and A. Arenas, Higher order interactions in complex networks of phase oscillators promote abrupt synchronization switching, Communications Physics3, 218 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Mill´ an, J

    A. Mill´ an, J. Torres, and G. Bianconi, Explosive higher- order Kuramoto dynamics on simplicial complexes, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 218301 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Nurisso, A

    M. Nurisso, A. Arnaudon, M. Lucas, R. L. Peach, P. Ex- pert, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, A unified framework for simplicial kuramoto models, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science34(2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Le´ on, R

    I. Le´ on, R. Muolo, S. Hata, and H. Nakao, The- ory of phase reduction from hypergraphs to simplicial complexes: A general route to higher-order Kuramoto models, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena482, 134858 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Battiston, C

    F. Battiston, C. Bick, M. Lucas, A. P. Mill´ an, P. S. Skardal, and Y. Zhang, Collective dynamics on higher- order networks, Nature Reviews Physics , 1 (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    C. Bick, P. Ashwin, and A. Rodrigues, Chaos in generi- cally coupled phase oscillator networks with nonpairwise interactions, Chaos26, 094814 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    Stankovski, T

    T. Stankovski, T. Pereira, P. V. E. McClintock, and A. Stefanovska, Coupling functions: Universal insights into dynamical interaction mechanisms, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics89, 045001 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    C. C. Gong and A. Pikovsky, Low-dimensional dynam- ics for higher-order harmonic, globally coupled phase- oscillator ensembles, Physical Review E100, 062210 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Lucas, G

    M. Lucas, G. Cencetti, and F. Battiston, Multiorder Laplacian for synchronization in higher-order networks, Physical Review Research2, 033410 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    X. Wang, H. Li, Q. Dai, and J. Yang, Coexistence of mul- tistable synchronous states in a three-oscillator system with higher-order interaction, Phys. Rev. E110, 034311 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Le´ on, R

    I. Le´ on, R. Muolo, S. Hata, and H. Nakao, Higher-order interactions induce anomalous transitions to synchrony, Chaos34, 013105 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    P. S. Skardal, F. Battiston, M. Lucas, M. S. Mizuhara, G. Petri, and Y. Zhang, Mixed higher-order coupling sta- bilizes new states (2025), arXiv:2510.09387 [nlin]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Adhikari, J

    S. Adhikari, J. Restrepo, and P. Skardal, Synchronization of phase oscillators on complex hypergraphs, Chaos33, 033116 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Huh and D

    H. Huh and D. Kim, Critical threshold for synchroniz- ability of high-dimensional Kuramoto oscillators under higher-order interactions, Chaos34(2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Costa, M

    G. Costa, M. Novaes, and M. de Aguiar, Bifurcations in the Kuramoto model with external forcing and higher- order interactions, Chaos34(2024). 7

    2024

  35. [35]

    Z. Wang, J. Zhu, and X. Liu, Moderate higher-order in- teractions enhance stability while preserving basin struc- ture, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals208, 118069 (2026)

    2026

  36. [36]

    Le´ on and D

    I. Le´ on and D. Paz´ o, Phase reduction beyond the first order: The case of the mean-field complex Ginzburg- Landau equation, Physical Review E100, 012211 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Le´ on and D

    I. Le´ on and D. Paz´ o, Enlarged Kuramoto model: Sec- ondary instability and transition to collective chaos, Phys. Rev. E105, L042201 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Nijholt, J

    E. Nijholt, J. L. Ocampo-Espindola, D. Eroglu, I. Z. Kiss, and T. Pereira, Emergent hypernetworks in weakly cou- pled oscillators, Nature communications13, 4849 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    E. T. K. Mau, M. Rosenblum, and A. Pikovsky, High- order phase reduction for coupled 2D oscillators, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33, 10.1063/5.0169008 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0169008 2023

  40. [40]

    C. Bick, T. B¨ ohle, and C. Kuehn, Higher-order network interactions through phase reduction for oscillators with phase-dependent amplitude, Journal of Nonlinear Science 34, 77 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Hamiltonian embedding also naturally produces both coupling types [61]

  42. [42]

    A. T. Winfree,The Geometry of Biological Time (Springer, New York, 1980)

    1980

  43. [43]

    Le´ on and H

    I. Le´ on and H. Nakao, Analytical phase reduction for weakly nonlinear oscillators, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 176, 114117 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Nevertheless, if oscillators are similarF j = F+O(κ), the results of the paper are valid, since the difference gives corrections of orderO(κ 2) to Eq

    Throughout the Letter we consider only identical os- cillators. Nevertheless, if oscillators are similarF j = F+O(κ), the results of the paper are valid, since the difference gives corrections of orderO(κ 2) to Eq. (3). If oscillators are not similar, the averaging procedure (see SM for details) cannot be performed and Eq. (4) becomes Π(θj, θk, θl) =Z(θ j...

  45. [45]

    J. A. Sanders, F. Verhulst, and J. Murdock,Averag- ing Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, 2nd ed., Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 59 (Springer, New York, NY, 2007)

    2007

  46. [46]

    If the oscillators are not identical nor similar, the resonance condition is not fulfilled and other har- monic/interaction may emerge

  47. [47]

    These functions are sometimes referred to as symmetric and asymmetric, respectively, based on their invariance under the swapping of non-focus oscillatorsk↔l[24]

  48. [48]

    Nakao, Complex ginzburg-landau equation on net- works and its non-uniform dynamics, The European Physical Journal Special Topics223, 2411 (2014)

    H. Nakao, Complex ginzburg-landau equation on net- works and its non-uniform dynamics, The European Physical Journal Special Topics223, 2411 (2014)

    2014

  49. [49]

    van der Pol, On relaxation-oscillations, The Lon- don, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 7,2, 978 (1926)

    B. van der Pol, On relaxation-oscillations, The Lon- don, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 7,2, 978 (1926)

    1926

  50. [50]

    FitzHugh, Impulses and physiological states in the- oretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys

    R. FitzHugh, Impulses and physiological states in the- oretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys. J.1, 445 (1961)

    1961

  51. [51]

    Nagumo, S

    J. Nagumo, S. Arimoto, and S. Yoshizawa, An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon, Proc. IRE 50, 2061 (1962)

    2061

  52. [52]

    E. E. Sel’kov, Self-oscillations in glycolysis. i. a simple kinetic model, European Journal of Biochemistry4, 79 (1968)

    1968

  53. [53]

    Brechmann and A

    P. Brechmann and A. D. Rendall, Dynamics of the selkov oscillator, Mathematical Biosciences306, 152 (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    Prigogine and G

    I. Prigogine and G. Nicolis, Symmetry breaking insta- bilities in dissipative systems, J. Chem. Phys.46, 3542 (1967)

    1967

  55. [55]

    Prigogine and R

    I. Prigogine and R. Lefever, Symmetry breaking instabil- ities in dissipative systems. ii, J. Chem. Phys.48, 1695 (1968)

    1968

  56. [56]

    Following [62], one could go further and design an os- cillator with the desired limit cycle and phase response function, allowing to control the form of the phase inter- actions

  57. [57]

    Clusella, A

    P. Clusella, A. Politi, and M. Rosenblum, A minimal model of self-consistent partial synchrony, New Journal of Physics18, 093037 (2016)

    2016

  58. [58]

    M. H. Matheny, M. Grau, L. G. Villanueva, R. B. Kara- balin, M. C. Cross, and M. L. Roukes, Phase Synchro- nization of Two Anharmonic Nanomechanical Oscilla- tors, Physical Review Letters112, 014101 (2014)

    2014

  59. [59]

    Goldbeter, A model for circadian oscillations in the drosophila period protein (per), Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    A. Goldbeter, A model for circadian oscillations in the drosophila period protein (per), Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences261, 319 (1995)

    1995

  60. [60]

    A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, A quantitative descrip- tion of membrane current and its application to conduc- tion and excitation in nerve, The Journal of physiology 117, 500 (1952)

    1952

  61. [61]

    Moriam´ e, M

    M. Moriam´ e, M. Lucas, and T. Carletti, Hamilto- nian control to desynchronize Kuramoto oscillators with higher-order interactions, Physical Review E111, 044307 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    Namura, T

    N. Namura, T. Ishii, and H. Nakao, Designing 2-d limit- cycle oscillators with prescribed trajectories and phase- response characteristics, IEEE Transactions on Auto- matic Control69, 3144 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    Katznelson,An introduction to harmonic analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    Y. Katznelson,An introduction to harmonic analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  64. [64]

    /” indicates thatGhas no parity in the corresponding argument. “*

    B. Ermentrout, Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony, Neural computation8, 979 (1996). 8 APPENDIX High harmonic decay The amplitude|π αβγ |decays rapidly with increasing harmonic order|α|+|β|+|γ|, which can be quanti- fied from standard Fourier regularity. If the limit cycle X c(θ) isC p, its Fourier coefficients decay algebraically, |an...

    1996

  65. [65]

    The symmetry rules are confirmed throughout: for oddF, all coefficients involving even harmonics (x 0,x 2,z 0, z2) vanish, leaving only the predicted nonzero terms. 2.Pairwise-like termsπ −1,1,0 andπ −1,0,1—corresponding to sin(θ j −θ k) and sin(θ j −θ l)—appear at orderϵ 2 for non-oddFin both cases, but forG=x kx2 l they are present regardless ofx 0 sinc...

  66. [66]

    ForG=x jxkxl the equalityπ −1,−1,2 =π −1,2,−1 ensures the full phase model preserves the permutation symmetry ofG, whereas forG=x kx2 l these differ sinceGis asymmetric underk↔l. α β γ Expression forG(x j, xk, xl) =x jxkxl 0 0 0 x3 0z0 + (x2 0x∗ 1z1 +x 2 0x1z∗ 1)ϵ2 + (x2 0x∗ 2z2 +x 2 0x2z∗ 2)ϵ4 0 -1 1 x0x1x∗ 1z0ϵ2 + (x1x∗2 1 z1 +x 2 1x∗ 1z∗ 1)ϵ4 0 -2 2 x0...