pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04947 · v1 · pith:7QLJMWMJnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · 🪐 quant-ph

Phase-correlation-free quantum key distribution source operating at gigahertz rates

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum key distributionphase randomizationsuperluminescent diodegigahertz ratestime-bin encodingdecoy-state protocolC-band
0
0 comments X

The pith

A superluminescent diode source supplies phase-randomized pulses at 1.25 GHz for secure high-speed QKD.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a superluminescent light-emitting diode can generate the optical pulses needed for decoy-state quantum key distribution at gigahertz rates while satisfying the phase-randomization requirement for security. Conventional laser sources tend to develop unwanted phase correlations between pulses when pushed to high repetition rates, which can open security loopholes. The SLED approach uses spontaneous emission to produce intrinsic phase randomization between successive signals while still delivering strong coherence inside each individual pulse. Interferometer tests on the 100 ps pulses with 400 ps spacing confirm over 99 percent visibility between adjacent time bins. This yields a compact, cost-effective platform for prepare-and-measure QKD that avoids active randomization hardware.

Core claim

A 1.25 GHz SLED source in the C-band produces approximately 100 ps pulses separated by 400 ps that exhibit greater than 99 percent visibility between adjacent time bins in interferometric measurements, confirming strong first-order coherence within each quantum signal, while the spontaneous-emission-driven operation ensures intrinsic global phase randomization between adjacent signals and thereby supplies a phase-correlation-free source for high-speed time-bin-encoded QKD.

What carries the argument

The spontaneous-emission-driven superluminescent light-emitting diode, which maintains intra-pulse coherence yet randomizes the global phase from one pulse to the next without external modulation.

If this is right

  • The source is directly compatible with high-speed time-bin encoding schemes.
  • It removes the need for active phase randomization or gain-switching that introduce correlations at gigahertz rates.
  • Pulse duration and separation support efficient operation in the C-band for fiber-based QKD.
  • The design provides a scalable route to compact prepare-and-measure QKD transmitters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same spontaneous-emission mechanism could be tested at still higher repetition rates to determine the practical upper limit before residual correlations appear.
  • Integration with existing commercial SLED modules might reduce the overall cost and footprint of field-deployed QKD systems.
  • The approach could be examined in other protocols that rely on phase randomization, such as certain measurement-device-independent schemes.

Load-bearing premise

Spontaneous emission inside the SLED produces fully uncorrelated phases between successive pulses with no residual correlations that would allow an eavesdropper to extract information.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of non-zero phase correlation between adjacent or successive pulses that exceeds the threshold compatible with positive secret-key rates in a decoy-state protocol run at the stated repetition rate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04947 by Alessandro Marcomini, Aur\'elien Cavali\'e, Boris Korzh, David Cabrerizo, Gianluca Boso, Lo\"ic Millet, Marcos Curty, Raphael Houlmann, Rob Thew, Shashank Kumar, Towsif Taher.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visibility comparison for laser and SLED sources. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental setup for phase-correlation measurements. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time-domain measurement of the prepared states. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Photon counts versus time with the HBT experiment for the SLED source filtered through the DWDM channel. The primary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Asymptotic secret key rate obtainable from a phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Phase randomization is essential for the security of practical decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) systems. Commonly, implementations rely on laser sources which are either actively phase-randomized, or gain-switched. However, at high repetition rates these show correlations, which can ultimately compromise security and performance. We present a 1.25 GHz phase-randomized QKD source based on a super-luminescent light emitting diode (SLED) operating in the C-band as a compact and cost-effective alternative. The source generates $\sim100$ ps optical pulses with $400$ ps pulse-to-pulse separation, compatible with high-speed time-bin encoding. Interferometric measurements demonstrate $>99\%$ visibility between adjacent time bins, confirming strong first-order coherence within the same quantum signals, while the spontaneous-emission-driven nature of the SLED ensures intrinsic global phase randomization between adjacent signals. This work establishes a scalable SLED-based platform for high-speed prepare-and-measure QKD systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a 1.25 GHz SLED-based optical source for prepare-and-measure QKD that generates ~100 ps pulses with 400 ps separation. It reports >99% interferometric visibility between adjacent time bins within individual pulses and asserts that the spontaneous-emission-driven operation of the SLED provides intrinsic global phase randomization between successive pulses, eliminating the need for active randomization or gain-switching while remaining compatible with time-bin encoding.

Significance. If the inter-pulse phase-randomization claim holds with quantitative bounds, the source would constitute a compact, cost-effective alternative to gain-switched lasers for gigahertz-rate decoy-state QKD, directly addressing correlation issues that can compromise security proofs at high repetition rates.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central security claim—that spontaneous emission ensures intrinsic global phase randomization between adjacent signals with no residual correlations—is asserted from device physics but is not supported by any interferometric visibility, phase-difference statistics, or correlation measurement performed on pulses belonging to consecutive drive periods (400 ps separation). Only intra-pulse first-order coherence is quantified.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported visibility >99% is given without raw data, error bars, statistical analysis, or details of the interferometric setup and fitting procedure, making it impossible to assess whether the measurement meets the quantitative requirements of decoy-state security proofs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting these important points regarding the presentation of our security claims and experimental details. We address each comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central security claim—that spontaneous emission ensures intrinsic global phase randomization between adjacent signals with no residual correlations—is asserted from device physics but is not supported by any interferometric visibility, phase-difference statistics, or correlation measurement performed on pulses belonging to consecutive drive periods (400 ps separation). Only intra-pulse first-order coherence is quantified.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not include a direct interferometric measurement of phase differences between pulses separated by 400 ps. The claim of intrinsic global phase randomization rests on the device physics of the SLED operating in the amplified spontaneous emission regime, where each pulse is seeded by independent spontaneous emission events with no retained phase memory from prior drive periods. This mechanism is distinct from gain-switched lasers, where carrier density fluctuations can induce correlations. We have revised the manuscript to expand the discussion of the expected phase diffusion timescale (derived from the SLED coherence length) and to cite relevant literature on ASE phase statistics, thereby providing a more quantitative physics-based argument. We have not added new experimental data on inter-pulse correlations, as our setup was configured for intra-pulse time-bin visibility relevant to the QKD protocol. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported visibility >99% is given without raw data, error bars, statistical analysis, or details of the interferometric setup and fitting procedure, making it impossible to assess whether the measurement meets the quantitative requirements of decoy-state security proofs.

    Authors: The interferometric setup, raw fringe data, error analysis, and fitting procedure used to determine the >99% visibility are described in the main text (Section on experimental characterization) and supplementary information. To improve clarity and allow direct assessment against decoy-state requirements, we have revised the manuscript to include explicit error bars on the visibility value, a statistical summary of multiple measurements, and additional details on the unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer configuration and data processing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; experimental demonstration with external benchmarks

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely experimental report on a SLED-based source. It describes pulse generation at 1.25 GHz, reports an interferometric visibility measurement (>99% between adjacent time bins within a pulse), and attributes inter-pulse phase randomization to the spontaneous-emission physics of the SLED. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains appear. The visibility datum is an independent experimental observable, not a quantity defined in terms of itself or obtained by fitting a related observable. The phase-randomization premise is presented as a consequence of device physics rather than a self-referential result. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a load-bearing way. This is the normal case of a self-contained experimental paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms listed. The central claim rests on the domain assumption that spontaneous emission produces global phase randomization.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spontaneous emission in a SLED produces uncorrelated global phases between successive pulses
    Invoked directly in the abstract to justify intrinsic randomization without additional hardware.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5739 in / 1130 out tokens · 29121 ms · 2026-06-28T05:54:26.034055+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Unconditional security in quantum cryptography

    Mayers, Dominic. Unconditional security in quantum cryptography. J. ACM

  2. [2]

    Quantum key distribution with correlated sources

    Pereira, Margarida and Kato, Go and Mizutani, Akihiro and Curty, Marcos and Tamaki, Kiyoshi. Quantum key distribution with correlated sources. Sci. Adv

  3. [3]

    Security of decoy-state quantum key distribution with correlated bit-and-basis encoders

    Curr \'a s-Lorenzo, Guillermo and Pereira, Margarida and Marcomini, Alessandro and Tamaki, Kiyoshi and Curty, Marcos. Security of decoy-state quantum key distribution with correlated bit-and-basis encoders. arXiv [quant-ph]

  4. [4]

    A critical analysis of deployed use cases for quantum key distribution and comparison with post-quantum cryptography

    Aquina, Nick and Cimoli, Bruno and Das, Soumya and H \"o velmanns, Kathrin and Weber, Fiona Johanna and Okonkwo, Chigo and Rommel, Simon and S kori \'c , Boris and Tafur Monroy, Idelfonso and Verschoor, Sebastian. A critical analysis of deployed use cases for quantum key distribution and comparison with post-quantum cryptography. EPJ Quantum Technol

  5. [5]

    Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres

    Yin, Juan and Li, Yu-Huai and Liao, Sheng-Kai and Yang, Meng and Cao, Yuan and Zhang, Liang and Ren, Ji-Gang and Cai, Wen-Qi and Liu, Wei-Yue and Li, Shuang-Lin and Shu, Rong and Huang, Yong-Mei and Deng, Lei and Li, Li and Zhang, Qiang and Liu, Nai-Le and Chen, Yu-Ao and Lu, Chao-Yang and Wang, Xiang-Bin and Xu, Feihu and Wang, Jian-Yu and Peng, Cheng-Zh...

  6. [6]

    High-rate quantum key distribution exceeding 110 Mb s--1

    Li, Wei and Zhang, Likang and Tan, Hao and Lu, Yichen and Liao, Sheng-Kai and Huang, Jia and Li, Hao and Wang, Zhen and Mao, Hao-Kun and Yan, Bingze and Li, Qiong and Liu, Yang and Zhang, Qiang and Peng, Cheng-Zhi and You, Lixing and Xu, Feihu and Pan, Jian-Wei. High-rate quantum key distribution exceeding 110 Mb s--1. Nat. Photonics

  7. [7]

    u nenfelder, Fadri and Boaron, Alberto and Resta, Giovanni V and Perrenoud, Matthieu and Rusca, Davide and Barreiro, Claudio and Houlmann, Rapha \

    Gr \"u nenfelder, Fadri and Boaron, Alberto and Resta, Giovanni V and Perrenoud, Matthieu and Rusca, Davide and Barreiro, Claudio and Houlmann, Rapha \"e l and Sax, Rebecka and Stasi, Lorenzo and El-Khoury, Sylvain and H \"a nggi, Esther and Bosshard, Nico and Bussi \`e res, F \'e lix and Zbinden, Hugo. Fast single-photon detectors and real-time key disti...

  8. [8]

    Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices

    Xu, Feihu and Ma, Xiongfeng and Zhang, Qiang and Lo, Hoi-Kwong and Pan, Jian-Wei. Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices. Rev. Mod. Phys

  9. [9]

    Quantum key distribution: a survey on current vulnerability trends and potential implementation risks

    Brazaola-Vicario, Aitor and Ruiz, Alejandra and Lage, Oscar and Jacob, Eduardo and Astorga, Jasone. Quantum key distribution: a survey on current vulnerability trends and potential implementation risks. Opt. Contin

  10. [10]

    Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing

    Bennett, Charles H and Brassard, Gilles. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing

  11. [11]

    Interference of short optical pulses from independent gain-switched laser diodes for quantum secure communications

    Yuan, Z L and Lucamarini, M and Dynes, J F and Fr \"o hlich, B and Ward, M B and Shields, A J. Interference of short optical pulses from independent gain-switched laser diodes for quantum secure communications. Phys. Rev. Appl

  12. [12]

    A 100-pixel photon-number-resolving detector unveiling photon statistics

    Cheng, Risheng and Zhou, Yiyu and Wang, Sihao and Shen, Mohan and Taher, Towsif and Tang, Hong X. A 100-pixel photon-number-resolving detector unveiling photon statistics. Nat. Photonics

  13. [13]

    Statistical Optics

    Goodman, Joseph W. Statistical Optics

  14. [14]

    Quantum key distribution over multicore fiber

    Dynes, J F and Kindness, S J and Tam, S W-B and Plews, A and Sharpe, A W and Lucamarini, M and Fr \"o hlich, B and Yuan, Z L and Penty, R V and Shields, A J. Quantum key distribution over multicore fiber. Opt. Express

  15. [15]

    Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication

    Hwang, Won-Young. Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication. Phys. Rev. Lett

  16. [16]

    QKD security proofs for decoy-state BB84: protocol variations, proof techniques, gaps and limitations

    Tupkary, Devashish and Tan, Ernest Y-Z and Nahar, Shlok and Kamin, Lars and L \"u tkenhaus, Norbert. QKD security proofs for decoy-state BB84: protocol variations, proof techniques, gaps and limitations. arXiv [quant-ph]

  17. [17]

    Enhanced detection rate and high photon-number efficiencies with a scalable parallel SNSPD

    Stasi, Lorenzo and Taher, Towsif and Resta, Giovanni V and Zbinden, Hugo and Thew, Rob and Bussi \`e res, F \'e lix. Enhanced detection rate and high photon-number efficiencies with a scalable parallel SNSPD. ACS Photonics

  18. [18]

    Numerical security analysis for practical quantum key distribution

    Navarrete, \'A lvaro and Curr \'a s-Lorenzo, Guillermo and Pereira, Margarida and Curty, Marcos. Numerical security analysis for practical quantum key distribution. arXiv:2605.12984 [quant-ph]

  19. [19]

    Quantum networks using rare-earth ions

    Tittel, Wolfgang and Afzelius, Mikael and Kinos, A and Rippe, L and Walther, A. Quantum networks using rare-earth ions. Quantum Sci Technol

  20. [20]

    Multi-channel high speed quantum random number generating with DWDM and superluminescent LED

    Chen, Ziyang and Wang, Gan and Li, Zhengyu and Peng, Xiang and Guo, Hong. Multi-channel high speed quantum random number generating with DWDM and superluminescent LED. 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring)

  21. [21]

    Mode-pairing quantum key distribution

    Zeng, Pei and Zhou, Hongyi and Wu, Weijie and Ma, Xiongfeng. Mode-pairing quantum key distribution. Nat. Commun

  22. [22]

    Randomness quantification for quantum random number generation based on detection of amplified spontaneous emission noise

    Yang, Jie and Fan, Fan and Liu, Jinlu and Su, Qi and Li, Yang and Huang, Wei and Xu, Bingjie. Randomness quantification for quantum random number generation based on detection of amplified spontaneous emission noise. Quantum Sci. Technol

  23. [23]

    Photon statistics of amplified spontaneous emission in a dense wavelength-division multiplexing regime

    Pietralunga, Silvia M and Martelli, Paolo and Martinelli, Mario. Photon statistics of amplified spontaneous emission in a dense wavelength-division multiplexing regime. Opt. Lett

  24. [24]

    Photon statistics of amplified spontaneous emission noise in a 10-Gbit/s optically preamplified direct-detection receiver

    Wong, W S and Haus, H A and Jiang, L A and Hansen, P B and Margalit, M. Photon statistics of amplified spontaneous emission noise in a 10-Gbit/s optically preamplified direct-detection receiver. Opt. Lett

  25. [25]

    Experimental study on the security of superluminescent LED-based quantum random generator

    Li, Yuanhao and Fei, Yangyang and Wang, Weilong and Meng, Xiangdong and Wang, Hong and Duan, Qianheng and Ma, Zhi. Experimental study on the security of superluminescent LED-based quantum random generator. Opt. Eng

  26. [26]

    Phase-randomized laser pulse generation at 10 GHz for quantum photonic applications

    Lo, Yuen San and Brzosko, Adam H and Smith, Peter R and Woodward, Robert I and Marangon, Davide G and Dynes, James F and Ju \'a rez, Sergio and Para \"i so, Taofiq K and Stevenson, R Mark and Shields, Andrew J. Phase-randomized laser pulse generation at 10 GHz for quantum photonic applications. arXiv:2601.04031 [quant-ph]

  27. [27]

    Secure quantum key distribution

    Lo, Hoi-Kwong and Curty, Marcos and Tamaki, Kiyoshi. Secure quantum key distribution. Nat. Photonics

  28. [28]

    Advances in quantum cryptography

    Pirandola, S and Andersen, U L and Banchi, L and Berta, M and Bunandar, D and Colbeck, R and Englund, D and Gehring, T and Lupo, C and Ottaviani, C and Pereira, J L and Razavi, M and Shamsul Shaari, J and Tomamichel, M and Usenko, V C and Vallone, G and Villoresi, P and Wallden, P. Advances in quantum cryptography. Adv. Opt. Photonics

  29. [29]

    Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem

    Ekert, A K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett

  30. [30]

    Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters

    Lucamarini, M and Yuan, Z L and Dynes, J F and Shields, A J. Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature

  31. [31]

    Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing

    Bennett, Charles H and Brassard, Gilles. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Theor. Comput. Sci

  32. [32]

    Security bounds for decoy-state quantum key distribution with arbitrary photon-number statistics

    Foletto, Giulio and Picciariello, Francesco and Agnesi, Costantino and Villoresi, Paolo and Vallone, Giuseppe. Security bounds for decoy-state quantum key distribution with arbitrary photon-number statistics. Phys. Rev. A

  33. [33]

    Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol

    Shor, P W and Preskill, J. Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol. Phys. Rev. Lett

  34. [34]

    The quantum theory of light

    Loudon, Rodney. The quantum theory of light

  35. [35]

    Optical coherence and quantum optics

    Mandel, Leonard and Wolf, Emil and Shapiro, Jeffrey H. Optical coherence and quantum optics. Am. J. Phys

  36. [36]

    Testing the photon-number statistics of a quantum key distribution light source

    Dynes, J F and Lucamarini, M and Patel, K A and Sharpe, A W and Ward, M B and Yuan, Z L and Shields, A J. Testing the photon-number statistics of a quantum key distribution light source. Opt. Express

  37. [37]

    Decoy state quantum key distribution

    Lo, Hoi-Kwong and Ma, Xiongfeng and Chen, Kai. Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett

  38. [38]

    Getting something out of nothing

    Lo, H-K. Getting something out of nothing. Quantum Inf. Comput

  39. [39]

    Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution

    Ma, Xiongfeng and Qi, Bing and Zhao, Yi and Lo, Hoi-Kwong. Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A

  40. [40]

    Loss-tolerant quantum cryptography with imperfect sources

    Tamaki, Kiyoshi and Curty, Marcos and Kato, Go and Lo, Hoi-Kwong and Azuma, Koji. Loss-tolerant quantum cryptography with imperfect sources. Phys. Rev. A

  41. [41]

    A Study on Implementation Attacks against QKD Systems

    BSI. A Study on Implementation Attacks against QKD Systems

  42. [42]

    Reference-beam attacks against twin-field quantum key distribution using optical injection locking

    Ju \'a rez, Sergio and Marcomini, Alessandro and Petrov, Mikhail and Woodward, Robert I and Dowling, Toby J and Stevenson, R Mark and Curty, Marcos and Rusca, Davide. Reference-beam attacks against twin-field quantum key distribution using optical injection locking. Phys. Rev. A

  43. [43]

    Practical security of twin-field quantum key distribution with optical phase-locked loop under wavelength-switching attack

    Peng, Qingquan and Chen, Jiu-Peng and Xing, Tianyi and Wang, Dongyang and Wang, Yizhi and Liu, Yang and Huang, Anqi. Practical security of twin-field quantum key distribution with optical phase-locked loop under wavelength-switching attack. NPJ Quantum Inf

  44. [44]

    Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication

    Briegel, H-J and D \"u r, W and Cirac, J I and Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett

  45. [45]

    Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet

    Azuma, Koji and Economou, Sophia E and Elkouss, David and Hilaire, Paul and Jiang, Liang and Lo, Hoi-Kwong and Tzitrin, Ilan. Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet. Rev. Mod. Phys

  46. [46]

    Preparing a commercial quantum key distribution system for certification against implementation loopholes

    Makarov, Vadim and Abrikosov, Alexey and Chaiwongkhot, Poompong and Fedorov, Aleksey K and Huang, Anqi and Kiktenko, Evgeny and Petrov, Mikhail and Ponosova, Anastasiya and Ruzhitskaya, Daria and Tayduganov, Andrey and Trefilov, Daniil and Zaitsev, Konstantin. Preparing a commercial quantum key distribution system for certification against implementation ...

  47. [47]

    Quantum key distribution with imperfectly isolated devices

    Sixto, Xoel and Navarrete, \'A lvaro and Pereira, Margarida and Curr \'a s-Lorenzo, Guillermo and Tamaki, Kiyoshi and Curty, Marcos. Quantum key distribution with imperfectly isolated devices. Quantum Sci. Technol

  48. [48]

    Implementation security in quantum key distribution

    Zapatero, V \'i ctor and Navarrete, \'A lvaro and Curty, Marcos. Implementation security in quantum key distribution. Adv. Quantum Technol

  49. [49]

    Modeling and characterization of arbitrary order pulse correlations for quantum key distribution

    Agulleiro, Ainhoa and Gr \"u nenfelder, Fadri and Pereira, Margarida and Curr \'a s-Lorenzo, Guillermo and Zbinden, Hugo and Curty, Marcos and Rusca, Davide. Modeling and characterization of arbitrary order pulse correlations for quantum key distribution. arXiv [quant-ph] 2506.18684

  50. [50]

    Rigorous phase-error-estimation security framework for QKD with correlated sources

    Curr \'a s-Lorenzo, Guillermo and Pereira, Margarida and Tamaki, Kiyoshi and Curty, Marcos. Rigorous phase-error-estimation security framework for QKD with correlated sources. arXiv [quant-ph] 2601.08417

  51. [51]

    Quantum key distribution with unbounded pulse correlations

    Pereira, Margarida and Curr \'a s-Lorenzo, Guillermo and Mizutani, Akihiro and Rusca, Davide and Curty, Marcos and Tamaki, Kiyoshi. Quantum key distribution with unbounded pulse correlations. Quantum Sci. Technol

  52. [52]

    Characterising higher-order phase correlations in gain-switched laser sources with application to quantum key distribution

    Marcomini, Alessandro and Curr \'a s-Lorenzo, Guillermo and Rusca, Davide and Valle, Angel and Tamaki, Kiyoshi and Curty, Marcos. Characterising higher-order phase correlations in gain-switched laser sources with application to quantum key distribution. EPJ Quantum Technol

  53. [53]

    Intensity correlations in decoy-state BB84 quantum key distribution systems

    Trefilov, Daniil and Sixto, Xoel and Zapatero, V \'i ctor and Huang, Anqi and Curty, Marcos and Makarov, Vadim. Intensity correlations in decoy-state BB84 quantum key distribution systems. Opt. Quantum

  54. [54]

    Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect phase randomisation

    Curr \'a s-Lorenzo, Guillermo and Nahar, Shlok and L \"u tkenhaus, Norbert and Tamaki, Kiyoshi and Curty, Marcos. Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect phase randomisation. Quantum Sci. Technol

  55. [55]

    Simple 2.5 GHz time-bin quantum key distribution

    Boaron, Alberto and Korzh, Boris and Houlmann, Raphael and Boso, Gianluca and Rusca, Davide and Gray, Stuart and Li, Ming-Jun and Nolan, Daniel and Martin, Anthony and Zbinden, Hugo. Simple 2.5 GHz time-bin quantum key distribution. Appl. Phys. Lett

  56. [56]

    Security of quantum key distribution with intensity correlations

    Zapatero, V \'i ctor and Navarrete, \'A lvaro and Tamaki, Kiyoshi and Curty, Marcos. Security of quantum key distribution with intensity correlations. Quantum

  57. [57]

    An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres

    Chen, Yu-Ao and Zhang, Qiang and Chen, Teng-Yun and Cai, Wen-Qi and Liao, Sheng-Kai and Zhang, Jun and Chen, Kai and Yin, Juan and Ren, Ji-Gang and Chen, Zhu and Han, Sheng-Long and Yu, Qing and Liang, Ken and Zhou, Fei and Yuan, Xiao and Zhao, Mei-Sheng and Wang, Tian-Yin and Jiang, Xiao and Zhang, Liang and Liu, Wei-Yue and Li, Yang and Shen, Qi and Cao...

  58. [58]

    Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution

    Liao, Sheng-Kai and Cai, Wen-Qi and Liu, Wei-Yue and Zhang, Liang and Li, Yang and Ren, Ji-Gang and Yin, Juan and Shen, Qi and Cao, Yuan and Li, Zheng-Ping and Li, Feng-Zhi and Chen, Xia-Wei and Sun, Li-Hua and Jia, Jian-Jun and Wu, Jin-Cai and Jiang, Xiao-Jun and Wang, Jian-Feng and Huang, Yong-Mei and Wang, Qiang and Zhou, Yi-Lin and Deng, Lei and Xi, T...

  59. [59]

    Long-distance coherent quantum communications in deployed telecom networks

    Pittaluga, Mirko and Lo, Yuen San and Brzosko, Adam and Woodward, Robert I and Scalcon, Davide and Winnel, Matthew S and Roger, Thomas and Dynes, James F and Owen, Kim A and Ju \'a rez, Sergio and Rydlichowski, Piotr and Vicinanza, Domenico and Roberts, Guy and Shields, Andrew J. Long-distance coherent quantum communications in deployed telecom networks. Nature

  60. [60]

    Large-scale quantum communication networks with integrated photonics

    Zheng, Yun and Wang, Hanyu and Jia, Xinyu and Huang, Jiahui and Yuan, Huihong and Zhai, Chonghao and Dai, Junhao and Shi, Jingbo and Zhang, Lei and Zhang, Xuguang and Zhuang, Minxue and Liu, Jinchang and Mao, Jun and Dai, Tianxiang and Fu, Zhaorong and Jiao, Yuqing and Shi, Yaocheng and Dai, Daoxin and Wang, Xingjun and Li, Yan and Gong, Qihuang and Yuan,...

  61. [61]

    Integration of quantum key distribution and high-throughput classical communications in field-deployed multi-core fibers

    Wu, Qi and Ribezzo, Domenico and Di Sciullo, Giammarco and Cocchi, Sebastiano and Ann Shaji, Divya and Alves Zischler, Lucas and Luis, Ruben and Serena, Paolo and Lasagni, Chiara and Bononi, Alberto and Hayashi, Tetsuya and Gagliano, Alessandro and Martelli, Paolo and Gatto, Alberto and Parolari, Paola and Boffi, Pierpaolo and Bacco, Davide and Zavatta, A...

  62. [62]

    Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution

    Lim, Charles Ci Wen and Curty, Marcos and Walenta, Nino and Xu, Feihu and Zbinden, Hugo. Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A

  63. [63]

    Finite-key analysis for the 1-decoy state QKD protocol

    Rusca, Davide and Boaron, Alberto and Gr \"u nenfelder, Fadri and Martin, Anthony and Zbinden, Hugo. Finite-key analysis for the 1-decoy state QKD protocol. Appl. Phys. Lett

  64. [64]

    Performance and security of 5 GHz repetition rate polarization-based quantum key distribution

    Gr \"u nenfelder, Fadri and Boaron, Alberto and Rusca, Davide and Martin, Anthony and Zbinden, Hugo. Performance and security of 5 GHz repetition rate polarization-based quantum key distribution. Appl. Phys. Lett

  65. [65]

    Evaluation of the phase randomness of a light source in quantum-key-distribution systems with an attenuated laser

    Kobayashi, Toshiya and Tomita, Akihisa and Okamoto, Atsushi. Evaluation of the phase randomness of a light source in quantum-key-distribution systems with an attenuated laser. Phys. Rev. A

  66. [66]

    Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography

    Wang, Xiang-Bin. Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett

  67. [67]

    The security of practical quantum key distribution

    Scarani, Valerio and Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Helle and Cerf, Nicolas J and Du s ek, Miloslav and L \"u tkenhaus, Norbert and Peev, Momtchil. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Rev. Mod. Phys

  68. [68]

    Quantum cryptography

    Gisin, Nicolas and Ribordy, Gr \'e goire and Tittel, Wolfgang and Zbinden, Hugo. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys

  69. [69]

    Pulsed energy-time entangled twin-photon source for quantum communication

    Brendel, J and Gisin, N and Tittel, W and Zbinden, H. Pulsed energy-time entangled twin-photon source for quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett

  70. [70]

    Quantum cryptography using entangled photons in energy-time bell states

    Tittel, W and Brendel, J and Zbinden, H and Gisin, N. Quantum cryptography using entangled photons in energy-time bell states. Phys. Rev. Lett

  71. [71]

    Effects of magnetized plasma on the propagation properties of obliquely incident THz waves

    Tian, Yunxian and Yan, Weizhong and Gu, Xiaoliang and Jin, Xiaolin and Li, Jianqing and Li, Bin. Effects of magnetized plasma on the propagation properties of obliquely incident THz waves. AIP Adv

  72. [72]

    Optical coherence and quantum optics

    Mandel, Leonard and Wolf, Emil. Optical coherence and quantum optics

  73. [73]

    Generator of arbitrary classical photon statistics

    Straka, Ivo and Mika, Jarom \'i r and Je z ek, Miroslav. Generator of arbitrary classical photon statistics. Opt. Express

  74. [74]

    Simultaneous quantum cryptographic key distributionand conventional data transmission over installed fibre using wavelength-divisionmultiplexing

    Townsend, P D. Simultaneous quantum cryptographic key distributionand conventional data transmission over installed fibre using wavelength-divisionmultiplexing. Electron. Lett

  75. [75]

    Detecting single infrared photons with 93\

    Marsili, F and Verma, V B and Stern, J A and Harrington, S and Lita, A E and Gerrits, T and Vayshenker, I and Baek, B and Shaw, M D and Mirin, R P and Nam, S W. Detecting single infrared photons with 93\. Nat. Photonics

  76. [76]

    Efficient time-bin encoding for practical high-dimensional quantum key distribution

    Vagniluca, Ilaria and Da Lio, Beatrice and Rusca, Davide and Cozzolino, Daniele and Ding, Yunhong and Zbinden, Hugo and Zavatta, Alessandro and Oxenl we, Leif K and Bacco, Davide. Efficient time-bin encoding for practical high-dimensional quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Appl

  77. [77]

    Limitations on practical quantum cryptography

    Brassard, G and Lutkenhaus, N and Mor, T and Sanders, B C. Limitations on practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett

  78. [78]

    A fully passive transmitter for decoy-state quantum key distribution

    Zapatero, V \'i ctor and Wang, Wenyuan and Curty, Marcos. A fully passive transmitter for decoy-state quantum key distribution. Quantum Sci. Technol

  79. [79]

    Fully passive quantum key distribution

    Wang, Wenyuan and Wang, Rong and Hu, Chengqiu and Zapatero, Victor and Qian, Li and Qi, Bing and Curty, Marcos and Lo, Hoi-Kwong. Fully passive quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett