pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05146 · v1 · pith:5LXUSWAGnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Early Multiwavelength Observations of AT 2026fgk: The Luminous Afterglow to Sub-luminous GRB 260310A, Identified Independently of a Gamma-ray Trigger

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 04:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords gamma-ray burstssub-luminous GRBsafterglowsbroad-lined Type Ic supernovaeLorentz factorevent ratesoptical transient surveys
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sub-luminous GRB rate matches the high-luminosity long-GRB rate, constraining low initial Lorentz factors and beaming.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the blind optical discovery and 50-day multiwavelength follow-up of the afterglow to Fermi-GBM GRB 260310A at z=0.153, which is sub-luminous yet unusually bright across X-ray, optical, and radio bands. It spectroscopically confirms an underlying broad-lined Type Ic supernova and uses afterglow modeling of the long optical rise to infer either a low initial Lorentz factor near 40 or a viewing angle of at most 3 degrees. The volumetric rate derived from the ZTF flux-limited survey is 0.30^{+1.37}_{-0.29} Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, statistically consistent with the on-axis high-luminosity long-GRB rate. This rate match is presented as evidence that low-Lorentz-factor bursts cannot be common and that the initial relativistic material does not exhibit strongly different beaming between luminosity classes.

Core claim

The central claim is that the similarity between the volumetric rate of AT 2026fgk-like sub-luminous events and the on-axis high-luminosity long-GRB rate directly limits how prevalent low-Gamma0 bursts can be and how the initial relativistic outflow is beamed.

What carries the argument

The afterglow modeling that yields Gamma0 approx 40 or off-axis angle less than or equal to 3 degrees, combined with the ZTF-derived volumetric rate comparison to high-luminosity GRBs.

If this is right

  • Low initial Lorentz factor bursts must be rare in the overall GRB population.
  • The beaming fraction of the initial relativistic material is comparable for sub-luminous and high-luminosity events.
  • Sub-luminous GRBs do not form a separate population with distinctly different jet properties.
  • Optical flux-limited surveys can independently recover sub-luminous GRB afterglows at rates matching gamma-ray-triggered samples.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rate match holds, GRB jets may follow a continuous distribution of Lorentz factors rather than a sharp separation between luminous and sub-luminous classes.
  • Repeated optical detections of similar events could test whether host galaxy properties or supernova parameters correlate with the inferred low Gamma0 or off-axis geometry.
  • The result suggests that the central engine can produce comparable total energy release across a wide range of observed luminosities.

Load-bearing premise

The ZTF flux-limited survey selection function and single-event rate extrapolation accurately represent the full population of sub-luminous GRBs without large unrecognized biases in detection efficiency or host properties.

What would settle it

A larger optical survey sample that yields a volumetric rate for similar events differing by more than the reported uncertainties would falsify the claimed rate consistency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05146 by A. Aryan, A. Bochenek, A. C. Readhead, A. Krassilchtchikov, A. Kraus, A. Kumar, A. Levan, A. Martin-Carrillo, A. Nugent, A. R. Escorial, A. Ruiz Del Pozo, A. Sasli, A. Y. Q. Ho, B. P. Gompertz, B. Rusholme, C. Fremling, C. Sevilla, C. T. Christy, D. A. Perley, Dimple, D. K. Galloway, D. Kovaleva, D. O'Neill, D. Polishook, D. Schiminovich, D. Steeghs, D. Xu, E. C. Bellm, E. Kammoun, E. O. Ofek, E. Segre, F. Cuadra, G. Corcoran, G. K. Keating, G. Mo, G. P. Srinivasaragavan, G. Pugliese, G. Ramsay, G. Schroeder, G. S. H. Paek, G. Waratkar, I. Andreoni, J. C. Jaimes, J. C. Vel'azquez, J. H. Gillanders, J. L. Wise, J. Lyman, J. Purdum, J. Rastinejad, J. Sollerman, K. Ackley, K. C. Chambers, K. De, K. Noysena, K. -R. Hinds, K. Ulaczyk, K. W. Smith, L. Cotter, L. K. Nuttall, M. A. Gurwell, M. Bremer, M. E. Huber, M. F. Aller, M. J. Dyer, M. Kasliwal, M. Nicholl, M. Pursiainen, M. Shrestha, M. W. Coughlin, N. Sarin, N. Sravan, P. Jakobsson, P. Minguez, P. O'Brien, P. Rekhi, P. V. de la Parra, R. A. Perley, R. Jayaraman, R. Konno, R. Kotak, R. P. Breton, R. Rao, R. Riddle, R. R. Laher, R. Stein, R. Wainscoat, S. B. Cenko, S. Belkin, S. Ben-Ami, S. Garrappa, S. Ibrahim, S. J. Smartt, S. Rose, S. Srivastav, S. Yang, T. Ahumada, T. de Boer, T. Killestein, T. Surti, T. -W. Chen, V. D'Elia, V. S. Dhillon, X. J. Hall, Y. M. Shani, Y. Wagh, Z. McGrath.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: GRB 260310A (red diamond) in the 𝐸peak -𝐸iso plane (Amati relation). Blue and orange lines show the best-fit correla￾tions and the 3𝜎 confidence intervals for long and short GRBs. GR￾B-SNe (magenta diamonds; Z. Cano et al. 2017 and P. Y. Minaev & A. S. Pozanenko 2020), EP-FXT XRF transients (green squares; H. Sun et al. 2025; S.-Q. Jiang et al. 2025; A. Ghosh et al. 2025; W.-X. Li et al. 2025; G. P. Sriniv… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Multi-band optical and NIR light curves of GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk, spanning from ∼17 minutes (first GOTO detection) to ∼+50 d post trigger. Filled symbols denote photometry from this work (ZTF, SEDM, WINTER, LT, LAST, GOTO, MIRAGE, NOT, TJO, ATLAS, LOT, LDT, LCOGT, and SLT). We extrapolate the pre-jet-break power-law in GOTO 𝐿 to the first GOTO epoch to demonstrate there is a brightening in GOTO 𝐿, indic… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Color composite images of the field of GRB 260310A /AT 2026fgk. Left: Pre-explosion reference image constructed from Legacy Survey (𝑔𝑟 𝑧) and Pan-STARRS (𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑦) imaging, combined into a single RGB frame. Right: Science-epoch color composite assembled from 𝑔𝑟𝑖 imaging from the Liverpool Telescope and Nordic Optical Telescope on 2026 April 23–24 (Δ𝑡 ≈ 44 d). Both panels are centered on the host, with a 10′′in… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: NOT/ALFOSC 𝑟-band polarimetry of GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk. Stars in the Heiles catalog (C. Heiles 2000) within 5 ◦ and the maximum Galactic ISP (9% × 𝐸(𝐵 −𝑉); K. Serkowski et al. 1975) are shown. The event is consistent with MW ISP at ∼ 2𝜎. We report aperture photometry magnitudes matched to the seeing at the epoch of observation in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Optical spectral sequence of GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk. Spectra are labeled by observing instrument and phase relative to 𝑇0 . Spectra of SN 1998bw and SN 2006aj, well studied Type Ic-BL SNe, are included here for comparison in black. All spectra are smoothed and normalized for comparison. It is clear that no broad features appear until well into the decline phase, indicating the mini￾mal contribution of th… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top: X-ray (∼ 0.5–10 keV) light curve of GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk from EP/FXT (black circles), NuSTAR (blue stars), and Chandra (green pentagon). The early decline is well described by a smoothly broken power law (green dashed; 𝑡b = 8.45 ± 0.65 d, 𝛼1 = −0.33 ± 0.08 , 𝛼2 = −1.87 ± 0.19). We observe a late time re-brightening/plateau until 31.9 ± 5.3 d before a resumed decline with 𝛼3 = −1.1 ± 0.5. Gray squa… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radio (cm-to-mm) light curve of GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk, color coded by frequency and with different symbols for different data sources. 2.8.1. Very Large Array (VLA) Through a VLA DDT (Program ID 26A-608, PI Perley) and a regular cycle VLA proposal (Program ID 26A-177, PI Gompertz), we obtained several epochs at 𝑇0 +3.9 to +50 d with coverage from 1 – 50 GHz (D. A. Perley et al. 2026a; G. Schroeder et al… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Optical light curves of GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk in 𝑔, 𝑟, 𝑖, and 𝑧 bands, with photometry color-coded by band and marker shapes by instrument. In each band the best-fit model (solid) is the sum of a BPL afterglow (dashed) and a stretched+scaled SN 1998bw template (dotted A. Clocchiatti et al. 2011), obtained from a joint 𝜒 2 minimization across all four bands; scaled SN 1998bw data points are shown as squa… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The JWST/NIRSpec spectrum of GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk. The red end is dominated by a power-law from the GRB afterglow (red dotted line), while the blue end exhibits broad absorption and emission features characteristic of Ic-BL SNe. The continuum is reasonably approximated by a blackbody plus power-law model (red dashed line) which facilitates the identification of broad absorption features attributed to O… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the light curve of GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk to other GRB afterglows at X-ray (top), optical (mid￾dle), and radio (bottom) wavelengths. X-ray light curves are drawn from the Swift/XRT repository (P. A. Evans et al. 2007), supple￾mented for individual events by GRB 980425 (E. Pian et al. 2000) and GRB 030329 (A. Tiengo et al. 2004). Optical light curves are taken from the compilation of D. A. … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top left: Optical + X-ray SED at three epochs between (+10.55 d, +32.50 d, and +40.91 d observer frame), offset vertically by -0.75 dex per epoch for clarify. Circles show optical/NIR photometry MW de-reddened. Colored power-law segments render the X-ray 𝐹𝜈 (𝜈) across each instruments quoted band (0.3–10 keV for Chandra, 3–79 keV for NuSTAR) using the measured photon index (Γ; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figure… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Rest frame 𝑟-band absolute magnitude light curve of GRB 260310A (blue crosses) compared to GRB-SNe, Type Ic-BL SNe and ordinary Type Ib/c SNe. The solid blue curve is our best fit afterglow + SN model (see Section 3), and the dashed blue curve is the SN component (SN 1998bw template scaled; 𝑠 = 1.23+0.37 −0.12 and 𝑘𝑟 = 0.271+0.018 −0.013). In red are other SNe with sub-luminous GRBs (SN 1998bw, SN 2003lw,… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Spectral energy distribution at 3 days post GRB trigger plot fitted with Milky-Way and SMC-like host extinction models from K. D. Gordon et al. (2023); K. D. Gordon et al. (2024) (solid line), also showing the intrinsic color index 𝛽 for each fit (dashed line). extinction model. For the MW-G23 model, we have chosen to fit the data with the total-to-selective extinction ratio 𝑅𝑉 set to 3.0, chosen arbitrar… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: 𝜒 contour plots for MW-G24 and SMC-G23 fits to SED data at three days, illustrating the high degeneracy of 𝐴𝑉 and 𝛽 in the fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Multi-band light curves of GRB 260310A and its associated SN. Each band (𝑢𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑦) is shown with a constant offset. Curves are the posterior median of the joint smoothly-broken power-law afterglow + Arnett fit (W. D. Arnett 1982) described in Section 3.3. Solid line is the total (smoothly-broken power-law + Arnett), dashed is the afterglow only, and dotted is the SN only—16–84% posterior credible interval i… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Spectral energy distribution of the GRB 260310A host galaxy produced from SED fitting by FRANKENBLAST. Colored circles show observed photometry from GALEX, PS1, 2MASS, and WISE; filled squares are the best-fit photometry; the solid line and shaded region show the best-fit Prospector spectrum and it’s 1𝜎 uncertainty [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Posterior distributions from FRANKENBLAST SED fitting of the GRB 260310A host galaxy. The fit uses photometry spanning GALEX FUV/NUV through WISE W4—see Section 6. See A. E. Nugent et al. (2026) for further details [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_17.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The origins of sub-luminous ($L_\mathrm{\gamma,\mathrm{iso}} < 10^{49.5}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$) gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) associated with broad-lined Type~Ic supernovae (Ic-BL SNe) are poorly understood, in part due to the low discovery rate and faint afterglows. Here we present the identification of the optical afterglow of Fermi-GBM-detected GRB\,260310A (AT\,2026fgk) as a rapidly rising ($>1\,$mag\,d$^{-1}$), red ($g-r=0.4$\,mag) transient using the Gravitational-wave Optical Transient Observatory, Large Array Survey Telescope, and Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) data streams. We present multiwavelength follow-up observations from the first 50\,days, which reveal that GRB 260310A/AT\,2026fgk was sub-luminous ($L_\mathrm{\gamma,iso}=10^{48.8}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$); it was the most nearby ($z=0.153$) afterglow identified blindly by an optical survey; and that it is one of the brightest afterglows ever observed at X-ray, optical, and radio (cm to mm) wavelengths. We spectroscopically confirm an underlying Ic-BL SN with properties typical of GRB-SNe ($M_\mathrm{ej}\approx3\,M_\odot$, $E_{\rm K}\approx 10^{52}\,$erg). With basic modeling of the afterglow, including the long optical rise ($\approx10^{3}\,$s), we infer either a low initial Lorentz factor ($\Gamma_0\approx40$) or a slightly off-axis viewing angle ($\lesssim3^\circ$). The host galaxy's mass and star formation rate are similar to the hosts of other sub-luminous GRBs. ZTF's flux-limited survey gives a volumetric rate of AT\,2026fgk-like events of $0.30^{+1.37}_{-0.29}\,$Gpc\,$^{-3}$\,yr$^{-1}$, which is consistent with the on-axis, high luminosity ($L_{\rm \gamma,iso}>10^{49.5}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$) long-GRB rate. The similarity in the rates strongly constrains the prevalence of low-$\Gamma_0$ bursts and the beaming of the initial relativistic material in GRBs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the blind optical discovery and multiwavelength follow-up (X-ray to radio) of AT 2026fgk, the afterglow of sub-luminous GRB 260310A at z=0.153. It presents photometry showing a rapid red rise, spectroscopic confirmation of an underlying Ic-BL SN with M_ej≈3 M_⊙ and E_K≈10^52 erg, basic afterglow modeling of the ≈10^3 s optical rise that infers Γ_0≈40 or viewing angle ≲3°, and a ZTF-derived volumetric rate of 0.30^{+1.37}_{-0.29} Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} that is stated to be consistent with the on-axis high-luminosity long-GRB rate, thereby constraining the prevalence of low-Γ_0 bursts and initial beaming.

Significance. If the rate holds, the result supplies a direct empirical constraint on the fraction of low-Γ_0 or off-axis GRBs by showing that the sub-luminous population rate matches the high-luminosity on-axis rate. The multiwavelength dataset, SN spectroscopy, and independent optical identification of the nearest known afterglow add concrete value to the characterization of this rare class.

major comments (1)
  1. [rate calculation paragraph] Rate calculation paragraph: the headline claim that the measured rate is consistent with the on-axis high-luminosity long-GRB rate (and therefore constrains low-Γ_0 prevalence plus beaming) rests on the assumption that the ZTF flux-limited selection function and single-event extrapolation accurately represent the full population without large unrecognized biases in detection efficiency or host properties. No injection-recovery tests, color-cut validation, or cross-survey comparison are presented to support the efficiency for red, rapidly-rising events at z≈0.15; if efficiency is lower than modeled, the true rate could be substantially higher and the claimed similarity would not hold.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment on the rate calculation below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [rate calculation paragraph] Rate calculation paragraph: the headline claim that the measured rate is consistent with the on-axis high-luminosity long-GRB rate (and therefore constrains low-Γ_0 prevalence plus beaming) rests on the assumption that the ZTF flux-limited selection function and single-event extrapolation accurately represent the full population without large unrecognized biases in detection efficiency or host properties. No injection-recovery tests, color-cut validation, or cross-survey comparison are presented to support the efficiency for red, rapidly-rising events at z≈0.15; if efficiency is lower than modeled, the true rate could be substantially higher and the claimed similarity would not hold.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit injection-recovery tests or color-cut validations for this specific class of transients represents a limitation in the current analysis. The volumetric rate is calculated based on the single detection within the ZTF survey volume, using the survey's standard efficiency for detecting optical transients of similar brightness. While we did not perform dedicated simulations for red, rapidly-rising events at z≈0.15, the event was independently detected by multiple facilities (GOTO, LAST, ZTF), which provides some empirical support for the detectability. Nevertheless, to address the referee's concern, in the revised version we will expand the rate section to include a more detailed discussion of possible selection biases, including the potential impact of color and rise-time on efficiency, and qualify the consistency claim accordingly. We will also note that the large Poisson uncertainties already reflect the limitations of a single-event rate. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: rate derived directly from survey volume and single detection without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The volumetric rate of 0.30^{+1.37}_{-0.29} Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} is computed from the ZTF flux-limited survey detection of this one event and the corresponding comoving volume, with no parameters fitted to the same data then re-used as a 'prediction.' The similarity to the on-axis high-luminosity long-GRB rate is a comparison against an external literature value, and the resulting constraint on low-Gamma0 prevalence follows from that external comparison. No self-citation chain, self-definitional step, or ansatz smuggling appears in the provided derivation. The central claim therefore remains independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central rate-consistency claim rests on standard GRB afterglow synchrotron modeling (one fitted parameter: initial Lorentz factor) plus domain assumptions about survey completeness and jet geometry; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • initial Lorentz factor Gamma0 = 40
    Fitted in basic afterglow modeling to reproduce the long optical rise time of approximately 10^3 s.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard synchrotron afterglow model in a constant-density medium applies to this event
    Invoked in the paragraph describing basic modeling of the afterglow light curve.
  • domain assumption ZTF detection efficiency and flux limit are correctly modeled for the survey volume calculation
    Underlying the volumetric rate derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 7817 in / 1390 out tokens · 44424 ms · 2026-06-28T04:55:40.751941+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 241 canonical work pages · 121 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , year = 2011, month = nov, volume =

    Cross Spectral Calibration of Suzaku, XMM-Newton, and Chandra with PKS 2155304 as an Activity of IACHEC. , year = 2011, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/63.sp3.S657 , adsurl =

  2. [2]

    IACHEC Cross-Calibration of Chandra, NuSTAR, Swift, Suzaku, and XMM-Newton with 3C 273 and PKS 2155-304

    IACHEC Cross-calibration of Chandra, NuSTAR, Swift, Suzaku, XMM-Newton with 3C 273 and PKS 2155-304. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/2 , archivePrefix =. 1609.09032 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    Cross-calibrating X-ray detectors with clusters of galaxies: an IACHEC study

    Cross-calibrating X-ray detectors with clusters of galaxies: an IACHEC study. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015176 , archivePrefix =. 1008.2102 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = apr, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: NuSTAR detection of the rebrightening. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = apr, volume =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological Fast Optical Transients with the Zwicky Transient Facility: A Search for Dirty Fireballs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8bd0 , archivePrefix =. 2201.12366 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    The Nature of Optical Afterglows without Gamma-Ray Bursts: Identification of AT2023lcr and Multiwavelength Modeling. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc800 , archivePrefix =. 2411.07973 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Constraining the Kilonova Rate with Zwicky Transient Facility Searches Independent of Gravitational Wave and Short Gamma-Ray Burst Triggers. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbf4c , archivePrefix =. 2008.00008 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Fast-transient Searches in Real Time with ZTFReST: Identification of Three Optically Discovered Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and New Constraints on the Kilonova Rate. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0bc7 , archivePrefix =. 2104.06352 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    The luminous, slow-rising orphan afterglow AT2019pim as a candidate moderately relativistic outflow. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf125 , archivePrefix =. 2401.16470 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    Discovery of a Cosmological, Relativistic Outburst via its Rapidly Fading Optical Emission

    Discovery of a Cosmological, Relativistic Outburst via its Rapidly Fading Optical Emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/130 , archivePrefix =. 1304.4236 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    iPTF14yb: The First Discovery of a GRB Afterglow Independent of a High-Energy Trigger

    iPTF14yb: The First Discovery of a Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow Independent of a High-energy Trigger. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/803/2/L24 , archivePrefix =. 1504.00673 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    Observations of the GRB afterglow ATLAS17aeu and its possible association with GW170104

    Observations of the GRB Afterglow ATLAS17aeu and Its Possible Association with GW 170104. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa95c1 , archivePrefix =. 1706.00175 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    A Tale of Two Transients: GW 170104 and GRB 170105A. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa81d2 , archivePrefix =. 1706.00024 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Unveiling the enigma of ATLAS17aeu. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833814 , archivePrefix =. 1807.03681 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Gamma-ray bursts. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/8/R01 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0605208 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A New Forced Photometry Service for the Zwicky Transient Facility. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.16279 , archivePrefix =. 2305.16279 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    Transient Name Server AstroNote , keywords =

    Release of the ATLAS Forced Photometry server for public use. Transient Name Server AstroNote , keywords =

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    ZTF20aajnksq (AT 2020blt): A Fast Optical Transient at z ≍ 2.9 with No Detected Gamma-Ray Burst Counterpart. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc34d , archivePrefix =. 2006.10761 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    Optical Photometry and Spectroscopy of the SN 1998bw-like Type Ic Supernova 2002ap

    Optical Photometry and Spectroscopy of the SN 1998bw-like Type Ic Supernova 2002ap. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/378242 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0307136 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    GRB 060218/SN 2006aj: A Gamma-Ray Burst and Prompt Supernova at z=0.0335

    GRB 060218/SN 2006aj: A Gamma-Ray Burst and Prompt Supernova at z = 0.0335. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/505177 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0603686 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    Photometry and Spectroscopy of GRB 030329 and Its Associated Supernova 2003dh: The First Two Months

    Photometry and Spectroscopy of GRB 030329 and Its Associated Supernova 2003dh: The First Two Months. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/379228 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0307435 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    X-ray emission from supernovae in dense circumstellar matter environments: A search for collisionless shocks

    X-Ray Emission from Supernovae in Dense Circumstellar Matter Environments: A Search for Collisionless Shocks. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/42 , archivePrefix =. 1206.0748 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    Variabilities of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Long-acting Engine, Anisotropic Jet or Many Fluctuating Regions?

    Variabilities of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Long-acting Engine, Anisotropic Jet, or Many Fluctuating Regions?. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/432567 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0409376 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    , year = 2011, month = nov, volume =

    Swift 1644+57: the longest gamma-ray burst?. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01151.x , archivePrefix =. 1105.3209 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    The Variable Light Curve of GRB 030329: The Case for Refreshed Shocks

    Astrophysics: refreshed shocks from a -ray burst. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/426138a , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0304563 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    Late evolution of the X-ray afterglow of GRB 030329

    Late evolution of the X-ray afterglow of GRB 030329. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041027 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0402644 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    XRF 100316D / SN 2010bh and the Nature of Gamma Ray Burst Supernovae

    XRF 100316D/SN 2010bh and the Nature of Gamma-Ray Burst Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/41 , archivePrefix =. 1104.5141 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    A new population of ultra-long duration gamma-ray bursts

    A New Population of Ultra-long Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/13 , archivePrefix =. 1302.2352 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    10.4 m GTC observations of the nearby VHE-detected GRB 190829A/SN 2019oyw. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039349 , archivePrefix =. 2009.04021 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    A Hubble Space Telescope Search for r-Process Nucleosynthesis in Gamma-Ray Burst Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad409c , archivePrefix =. 2312.04630 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    The Fast Evolution of SN 2010bh associated with XRF 100316D

    The fast evolution of SN 2010bh associated with XRF 100316D. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117929 , archivePrefix =. 1110.4109 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    Early-Time Photometry and Spectroscopy of the Fast Evolving SN 2006AJ Associated with GRB 060218

    Early-Time Photometry and Spectroscopy of the Fast Evolving SN 2006aj Associated with GRB 060218. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/505906 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0603377 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    The First Systematic Study of Type Ibc Supernova Multi-band Light Curves

    The First Systematic Study of Type Ibc Supernova Multi-band Light Curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/97 , archivePrefix =. 1011.4959 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    Optimal binning of X-ray spectra and response matrix design

    Optimal binning of X-ray spectra and response matrix design. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527395 , archivePrefix =. 1601.05309 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    The Large Array Survey Telescope-System Overview and Performances. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acd8f0 , archivePrefix =. 2304.04796 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    The Large Array Survey Telescope-Pipeline. I. Basic Image Reduction and Visit Coaddition. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad0977 , archivePrefix =. 2310.13063 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    TRANSLIENT: Detecting Transients Resulting from Point-source Motion or Astrometric Errors. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad408d , archivePrefix =. 2403.09771 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    The Large Array Survey Telescope-Pipeline. II. Image Subtraction and Transient Detection. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.27921 , archivePrefix =. 2604.27921 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , year = 2022, editor =

    The Einstein Probe Mission. Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , year = 2022, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_151-1 , adsurl =

  40. [40]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =

    Science objectives of the Einstein Probe mission. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-024-2600-3 , archivePrefix =. 2501.07362 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Palomar Gattini-IR: Survey Overview, Data Processing System, On-sky Performance and First Results. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab6069 , archivePrefix =. 1910.13319 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    Calibration of the NuSTAR High Energy Focusing X-ray Telescope

    Calibration of the NuSTAR High-energy Focusing X-ray Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/8 , archivePrefix =. 1504.01672 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems , year = 2006, editor =

    CIAO: Chandra's data analysis system. Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems , year = 2006, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.671760 , adsurl =

  44. [44]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = apr, volume =

    GRB 260310A: Late-time Chandra X-ray Detection. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = apr, volume =

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    The long-active afterglow of GRB 210204A: detection of the most delayed flares in a gamma-ray burst. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1061 , archivePrefix =. 2204.07587 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) Mission

    The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) High-energy X-Ray Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 , archivePrefix =. 1301.7307 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    ATLAS: A High-Cadence All-Sky Survey System

    ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aabadf , archivePrefix =. 1802.00879 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    Radiation Detection Technology and Methods , keywords =

    Data reduction and processing for the Follow-up X-ray Telescope onboard Einstein Probe. Radiation Detection Technology and Methods , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s41605-025-00526-8 , adsurl =

  49. [49]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, editor =

    XSPEC: The First Ten Years. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, editor =

  50. [50]

    1979, ApJ, 228, 939, doi: 10.1086/156922

    Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/156922 , adsurl =

  51. [51]

    On the use of C-stat in testing models for X-ray spectra

    On the use of C-stat in testing models for X-ray spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629319 , archivePrefix =. 1707.09202 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Design and Operation of the ATLAS Transient Science Server. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab936e , archivePrefix =. 2003.09052 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    Transient Name Server Discovery Report , keywords =

    GOTO Transient Discovery Report for 2026-03-10. Transient Name Server Discovery Report , keywords =

  54. [54]

    The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor

    The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/791 , archivePrefix =. 0908.0450 , primaryClass =

  55. [55]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A: Fermi GBM Final Real-time Localization. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  56. [56]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk: COLIBR \'I photometric evidence of the emerging supernova. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  57. [57]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A: OSIRIS+/GTC spectroscopic detection of the associated BL-Ic, SN 2026fgk. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  58. [58]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    Fermi GRB 260310A: Global MASTER-Net observations report. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  59. [59]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A: AstroSat CZTI detection of a long burst. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  60. [60]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A: potential optical counterpart. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  61. [61]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A: Fermi GBM Observation. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  62. [62]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB260310A / AT2026fgk: P200 Spectroscopy. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  63. [63]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: MASTER OT rebrightening during 7h observations. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  64. [64]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: CAHA 1.23m telescope optical observations. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  65. [65]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk: COLIBRÍ optical observations. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  66. [66]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk: Location in the Epeak - Eiso diagram. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  67. [67]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: OSIRIS+/GTC spectroscopy confirms redshift z = 0.153. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  68. [68]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A/AT 2026fgk: Bok spectroscopic observation. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  69. [69]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A: NOT optical polarimetry. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  70. [70]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A/AT 2026fgk: DDOTI Optical Detection. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  71. [71]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A/AT 2026fgk: J-band observations by the SYSU 80 cm infrared telescope. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  72. [72]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A: Einstein Probe Follow-up X-ray Telescope (FXT) Detection. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  73. [73]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A/AT 2026fgk: WINTER NIR Detections. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  74. [74]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: further CAHA 1.23m telescope optical observations suggest shallow decay. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  75. [75]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT 2026fgk: COLIBRÍ continuing optical observations. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  76. [76]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: Multiband optical follow-up with Kinder observations. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  77. [77]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: OASDG optical observations. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  78. [78]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: TNG NIR detection. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  79. [79]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A/AT2026fgk: radio detection at 15GHz. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

  80. [80]

    GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    GRB 260310A / AT2026fgk: SAO RAS optical observations. GRB Coordinates Network , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

Showing first 80 references.