pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05229 · v1 · pith:XQ7TP3WInew · submitted 2026-06-02 · 💻 cs.OH · physics.flu-dyn

Hairpin Vortices Extraction in Turbulent Boundary Layer Flows

Adeel Zafar , Zahra Poorshayegh , Lei Si , Di Yang , Guoning Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 07:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.OH physics.flu-dyn
keywords hairpin vorticesturbulent boundary layervortex extractionmerge tree segmentationbottom-up rejoiningskeleton analysisflow visualization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A bottom-up rejoining method extracts complete hairpin vortices from turbulent boundary layers without manual tuning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a framework to extract hairpin vortices, key structures in turbulent boundary layers involved in energy dissipation and momentum transport. It identifies vortical regions, segments them with merge trees, and rejoins segments bottom-up using the vortices' geometric and physical characteristics to form complete structures. Validation follows via skeleton analysis for the hairpin shape and additional scalar criteria, with smooth surfaces generated for visualization. The approach targets challenges of irregular shapes, scale variations, and entanglements, claiming better accuracy and efficiency than prior methods while eliminating manual parameter tuning, as tested on multiple datasets with ground truth references.

Core claim

The central claim is that a merge tree segmentation followed by a novel bottom-up rejoining of candidate segments according to geometric and physical characteristics of hairpin vortices, refined by skeleton analysis and scalar criteria, produces regions containing complete hairpin vortex structures and enables accurate extraction without manual parameter tuning.

What carries the argument

The bottom-up rejoining approach that groups segments based on the geometric and physical characteristics of hairpin vortices after initial merge tree segmentation.

If this is right

  • Eliminates manual parameter tuning in vortex extraction.
  • Reduces under-segmentation and over-segmentation errors.
  • Improves accuracy and computational efficiency compared to existing approaches.
  • Supports robust extraction across varying boundary layer conditions.
  • Enables generation of smooth enclosing surfaces for visualization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could support more quantitative studies of how hairpin vortices drive mixing and transport in turbulence.
  • Similar rejoining logic might apply to extracting other complex, entangled flow structures.
  • The use of ground truth references could help establish benchmarks for comparing vortex extraction algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric and physical characteristics of hairpin vortices are distinctive enough to permit reliable bottom-up rejoining of segments into complete structures without significant grouping errors.

What would settle it

Applying the rejoining step to a turbulent boundary layer dataset with independently verified hairpin vortices and finding systematic incorrect groupings or missed structures would falsify the claim of reliable extraction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05229 by Adeel Zafar, Di Yang, Guoning Chen, Lei Si, Zahra Poorshayegh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Multiple overlapping vortices in a single vortical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: This figure summarizes the method proposed in [8] for addressing over-segmentation. (a) shows a hairpin vortex region. (b) shows two split segments (green and blue) obtained via minimal merge tree-based segmentation and layering, with their boundary highlighted (red square). (c) Vortex lines seeded from the boundary interface cover approximately equal areas in both segments, indicating an invalid split tha… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: This figure shows the failure of the method in [8] to separate a hairpin vortex from a vortical region. (a) A hairpin vortex is highlighted at level 1, where it is attached to other vortices at multiple boundary interfaces. By level 3, the left leg of the hairpin vortex detaches from the rest of the structure causing over-segmentation. (b) shows a simplified tree view of the split hierarchy of the vortical… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The pipeline of our framework for the extraction and visualization of hairpin vortices. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: This figure presents a comparison chart of the steps in our pipeline with those of Zafar et al. [7] and Zafar et al. [8]. step using the minimal merge tree (fig. 2((a)-(e))). In contrast, our approach extracts the entire merge tree and performs the merge tree-based segmentation only once (fig. 7(a)). As in [8], from the segmentation, we identify the leaf segments corresponding to saddle-minimum pairs in th… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: This figure illustrates the single-pass layering process applied to the entire merge tree-based segmentation. (a) shows the initial segmentation of the vortical region (b) presents the final segmentation produced after layering. The leaf segments corresponding to the six saddle–minima edge pairs in (a) are iteratively expanded into their respective parent segments (saddle–saddle pairs) using the layering p… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: This figure illustrates the idealized shape of hairpin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: This figure illustrates the hairpin vortex volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: This figure illustrates the hairpin vortex surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: This figure shows the extracted hairpin vortices from the bottom boundary layer of Couette flow from [10]. (a) shows the split segments of the general vortical regions obtained using our segmentation approach. (b) shows the ex￾tracted hairpin vortices. (c) presents a side-by-side comparison of each hairpin vortex between the references (GT), Zafar et al. [7] (A), Zafar et al. [8] (B), and ours (C). It can… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: This figure presents side-by-side comparisons of additional hairpin vortex cases from the channel flow dataset between the references (GT) and our results (C). The vortices are visualized with the direct volume rendering of λ2 inside their surfaces. Previous methods were unable to extract these hairpin vortices. methods suffer from both under- and over-segmentation. Our method also outperforms prior appro… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: (a) Examples of false positives produced by our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: This figure presents side-by-side comparisons of additional hairpin vortex cases from the TBL dataset between the references (GT) and our results (C). Color depicts the distribution of the x-component of vorticity (ωx) within the structures, highlighting the left–right counter-rotation charac￾teristic of hairpin vortices. Previous methods were unable to extract these hairpin vortices. 3320 × 2048 × 224 gr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hairpin vortices are fundamental structures within turbulent boundary layers, playing a crucial role in energy dissipation, mixing, and momentum transport. However, accurately extracting these structures remains challenging due to their irregular shapes, varying scales, and entanglement with surrounding vortical structures. This paper presents a novel framework for the extraction of hairpin vortices from turbulent boundary layers. The method begins by identifying vortical regions and decomposing them into smaller segments using merge tree based segmentation. A novel bottom up rejoining approach is then introduced to group candidate segments according to the geometric and physical characteristics of hairpin vortices, resulting in regions that encompass complete hairpin vortex structures. These regions are subsequently refined and validated through skeleton analysis to detect the characteristic hairpin shape and are further confirmed using additional scalar based criteria. Finally, smooth enclosing surfaces are generated for effective visualization. To enable quantitative evaluation, reference hairpin vortices are extracted from several flow datasets and used as ground truth. Compared with existing approaches, the proposed method eliminates manual parameter tuning, reduces under and over segmentation, and significantly improves both accuracy and computational efficiency. Demonstrations on multiple turbulent flow cases show that the method is robust and effective for hairpin vortex extraction under varying boundary layer conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

4 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents a framework for extracting hairpin vortices in turbulent boundary layer flows. It identifies vortical regions, applies merge-tree segmentation to decompose them into segments, uses a bottom-up rejoining procedure based on geometric and physical characteristics to assemble complete structures, refines via skeleton analysis to detect hairpin shapes and additional scalar criteria, and generates smooth enclosing surfaces. The method is claimed to eliminate manual parameter tuning, reduce under- and over-segmentation, and significantly improve accuracy and computational efficiency relative to prior approaches, with quantitative evaluation performed against reference hairpin vortices extracted as ground truth from multiple flow datasets.

Significance. If the evaluation were strengthened with independent ground truth and explicit metrics, the approach could meaningfully advance automated coherent-structure identification in turbulence research by addressing segmentation challenges without extensive tuning, enabling more reproducible analysis of energy dissipation and momentum transport in boundary layers.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the method 'eliminates manual parameter tuning' is load-bearing for the contribution yet is not supported, as the segmentation and rejoining steps are described as using thresholds whose values and independence from manual adjustment are unspecified.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertions of 'significantly improves both accuracy and computational efficiency' and 'reduces under and over segmentation' lack any quantitative support (e.g., precision/recall, timing benchmarks, or error rates against baselines), making the comparative advantage impossible to assess.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the procedure used to extract the 'reference hairpin vortices' employed as ground truth is not described; without an independent extraction method, the quantitative evaluation risks circularity when the same geometric criteria may be used for both the proposed method and the references.
  4. [Abstract] Abstract: the bottom-up rejoining step relies on 'geometric and physical characteristics of hairpin vortices' to group segments, but no explicit criteria, uniqueness arguments, or independence from ground-truth extraction are provided, leaving the weakest assumption (distinctiveness sufficient for error-free grouping) untested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

4 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments on the abstract. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of claims, support, and methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the method 'eliminates manual parameter tuning' is load-bearing for the contribution yet is not supported, as the segmentation and rejoining steps are described as using thresholds whose values and independence from manual adjustment are unspecified.

    Authors: We agree the abstract overstates the claim. The manuscript applies fixed thresholds derived from standard physical properties of hairpin vortices reported in the turbulence literature, without per-dataset adjustment. We will revise the abstract to state that the method reduces reliance on manual tuning through the use of these fixed, physically motivated criteria rather than claiming complete elimination. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertions of 'significantly improves both accuracy and computational efficiency' and 'reduces under and over segmentation' lack any quantitative support (e.g., precision/recall, timing benchmarks, or error rates against baselines), making the comparative advantage impossible to assess.

    Authors: Quantitative evaluations, including accuracy metrics and timing comparisons against prior methods, appear in the results section of the manuscript. We will revise the abstract to incorporate key quantitative results (e.g., precision/recall improvements and runtime reductions) to substantiate the claims. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the procedure used to extract the 'reference hairpin vortices' employed as ground truth is not described; without an independent extraction method, the quantitative evaluation risks circularity when the same geometric criteria may be used for both the proposed method and the references.

    Authors: We will add an explicit description of the ground-truth extraction procedure to the manuscript. This procedure combines expert manual identification with established vortex criteria from the literature that are independent of the proposed merge-tree and skeleton-based approach, thereby addressing the circularity concern. revision: yes

  4. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the bottom-up rejoining step relies on 'geometric and physical characteristics of hairpin vortices' to group segments, but no explicit criteria, uniqueness arguments, or independence from ground-truth extraction are provided, leaving the weakest assumption (distinctiveness sufficient for error-free grouping) untested.

    Authors: We will revise the manuscript to state the explicit rejoining criteria (curvature thresholds, orientation alignment, proximity, and vorticity consistency) and note their basis in prior hairpin vortex studies. The evaluation against independent ground truth provides empirical validation of the grouping; we will also add discussion of limitations regarding perfect error-free grouping in entangled flows. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algorithmic pipeline with independent geometric criteria

full rationale

The paper describes a procedural extraction method consisting of merge-tree segmentation, bottom-up rejoining using geometric and physical characteristics of hairpin vortices, skeleton analysis for shape detection, and scalar-based confirmation. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are present that reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing. The ground-truth reference extraction is stated without evidence that it employs the proposed method itself, so no self-definitional loop is exhibited. The derivation chain is a sequence of independent algorithmic steps rather than a mathematical reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach assumes standard properties of hairpin vortices in turbulent flows and relies on computational geometry techniques without introducing new physical entities. Specific parameters for segmentation thresholds are implied but not detailed.

free parameters (1)
  • segmentation and rejoining thresholds
    The method likely involves parameters for identifying vortical regions and grouping criteria, though not specified in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Vortical regions can be decomposed using merge trees and rejoined based on hairpin vortex characteristics.
    This is the foundation of the segmentation and rejoining approach described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5748 in / 1258 out tokens · 41573 ms · 2026-06-28T07:11:02.617862+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V ortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer,

    R. J. ADRIAN, C. D. MEINHART, and C. D. TOMKINS, “V ortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 422, p. 1–54, 2000

    2000

  2. [2]

    Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence,

    R. J. Adrian, “Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence,”Physics of Fluids, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 041301, 04 2007. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2717527

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2717527 2007

  3. [3]

    Experimental observation of hairpin auto-generation events in a turbulent boundary layer,

    N. Hutchins, W. T. Hambleton, I. Marusic, J. P. Monty, and J. C. Klewicki, “Experimental observation of hairpin auto-generation events in a turbulent boundary layer,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 747, pp. 1–17, 2014

    2014

  4. [4]

    Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow,

    J. Zhou, R. J. Adrian, S. Balachandar, and T. Kendall, “Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 387, 1999

    1999

  5. [5]

    On the identification of a vortex,

    J. Jeong and F. Hussain, “On the identification of a vortex,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 285, p. 69–94, 1995

    1995

  6. [6]

    V orticity and vortex dynamics in complex turbulent flows,

    J. Hunt, “V orticity and vortex dynamics in complex turbulent flows,”Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–35, 1987. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-1987-0004

    work page doi:10.1139/tcsme-1987-0004 1987

  7. [7]

    Extract and characterize hairpin vortices in turbulent flows,

    A. Zafar, D. Yang, and G. Chen, “Extract and characterize hairpin vortices in turbulent flows,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 716–726, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Topological separa- tion of vortices,

    A. Zafar, Z. Poorshayegh, D. Yang, and G. Chen, “Topological separa- tion of vortices,” in2024 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS), 2024, pp. 311–315

    2024

  9. [9]

    Computing contour trees in all dimensions,

    H. Carr, J. Snoeyink, and U. Axen, “Computing contour trees in all dimensions,”Computational Geometry, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 75–94, 2003, special Issue on the Fourth CGC Workshop on Computational Geometry. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0925772102000937

    2003

  10. [10]

    Direct numerical simulation and statistical analysis of stress-driven turbulent Couette flow with a free-slip boundary,

    M. Li and D. Yang, “Direct numerical simulation and statistical analysis of stress-driven turbulent Couette flow with a free-slip boundary,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 31, no. 8, 08 2019, 085113. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5099650

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5099650 2019

  11. [11]

    A web services accessible database of turbulent channel flow and its use for testing a new integral wall model for les,

    J. Graham, K. Kanov, X. Yang, M. Lee, N. Malaya, C. Lalescu, R. Burns, G. Eyink, A. Szalay, R. Moseret al., “A web services accessible database of turbulent channel flow and its use for testing a new integral wall model for les,”Journal of Turbulence, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 181–215, 2016

    2016

  12. [12]

    A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence,

    Y . Li, E. Perlman, M. Wan, Y . Yang, C. Meneveau, R. Burns, S. Chen, A. Szalay, and G. Eyink, “A public turbulence database cluster and applications to study lagrangian evolution of velocity increments in turbulence,”Journal of Turbulence, vol. 9, no. 31, 2008

    2008

  13. [13]

    The state of the art in vortex extraction,

    T. G ¨unther and H. Theisel, “The state of the art in vortex extraction,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 149–173, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cgf.13319

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.13319 2018

  14. [14]

    Bremer, A

    P.-T. Bremer, A. Gruber, J. Bennett, A. Gyulassy, H. Kolla, J. Chen, and R. Grout, “s,”Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computa- tional Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–53, 2015

    2015

  15. [15]

    Edelsbrunner and J

    H. Edelsbrunner and J. L. Harer,Computational topology: an introduc- tion. American Mathematical Society, 2010

    2010

  16. [16]

    A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields,

    M. S. Chong, A. E. Perry, and B. J. Cantwell, “A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields,”Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 765–777, 05 1990. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.857730

    work page doi:10.1063/1.857730 1990

  17. [17]

    Rortex—A new vortex vector definition and vorticity tensor and vector decompositions,

    C. Liu, Y . Gao, S. Tian, and X. Dong, “Rortex—A new vortex vector definition and vorticity tensor and vector decompositions,”Physics of Fluids, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 035103, 03 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5023001

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5023001 2018

  18. [18]

    Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows,

    J. C. Hunt, A. Wray, and P. Moin, “Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows,”Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simu- lation Databases, vol. 1, pp. 193–208, 1988

    1988

  19. [19]

    Identification of swirling flow in 3-d vector fields,

    D. Sujudi and R. Haimes, “Identification of swirling flow in 3-d vector fields,” in12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. San Diego, CA, U.S.A.: AIAA, 1995, p. 1715

    1995

  20. [20]

    The “parallel vectors

    R. Peikert and M. Roth, “The “parallel vectors” operator: a vector field visualization primitive,” inVIS ’99: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization ’99. Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999, pp. 263–270

    1999

  21. [21]

    Cores of swirling particle motion in unsteady flows,

    T. Weinkauf, J. Sahner, H. Theisel, and H.-C. Hege, “Cores of swirling particle motion in unsteady flows,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1759–1766, 2007

    2007

  22. [22]

    Topology-preserving lambda2-based vortex core line detection for flow visualization,

    T. Schafhitzel, J. E. V ollrath, J. P. Gois, D. Weiskopf, A. Castelo, and T. Ertl, “Topology-preserving lambda2-based vortex core line detection for flow visualization,”Comput. Graph. Forum, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1023– 1030, 2008

    2008

  23. [23]

    Exact analytical parallel vectors,

    H. Guo and T. Peterka, “Exact analytical parallel vectors,” in2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 101–105

    2021

  24. [24]

    V ortex lens: Interactive vortex core line extraction using observed line integral convolution,

    P. Rautek, X. Zhang, B. Woschizka, T. Theußl, and M. Hadwiger, “V ortex lens: Interactive vortex core line extraction using observed line integral convolution,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 2023

    2023

  25. [25]

    Hairpin vortex identification using template fitting on vortex corelines,

    A. Zafar and G. Chen, “Hairpin vortex identification using template fitting on vortex corelines,” [Poster presented at IEEE Visualization 2022]. [Online]. Available: https://ieeevis.b-cdn.net/vis 2022/posters/ v-vis-posters-1059.pdf

    2022

  26. [26]

    Geometric methods for vortex extrac- tion,

    I. A. Sadarjoen and F. H. Post, “Geometric methods for vortex extrac- tion,” inData Visualization’99. Springer, 1999, pp. 53–62

    1999

  27. [27]

    Detection, quantification, and tracking of vortices using streamline geometry,

    I. Ari Sadarjoen and F. H. Post, “Detection, quantification, and tracking of vortices using streamline geometry,”Computers & Graphics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 333–341, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097849300000297

    2000

  28. [28]

    Topological flow structures in a mathematical model for rotation-mediated cell aggregation,

    A. Wiebel, R. Chan, C. Wolf, A. Robitzki, A. Stevens, and S. Gerik, “Topological flow structures in a mathematical model for rotation-mediated cell aggregation,” inTopological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, pp. 193–204. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15014-2 2011

  29. [29]

    Streak lines as tangent curves of a derived vector field,

    T. Weinkauf and H. Theisel, “Streak lines as tangent curves of a derived vector field,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1225–1234, 2010

    2010

  30. [30]

    Visual analysis of spatia-temporal relations of pairwise attributes in unsteady ACCEPTED IN IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS 13 flow,

    M. Berenjkoub, R. O. Monico, R. S. Laramee, and G. Chen, “Visual analysis of spatia-temporal relations of pairwise attributes in unsteady ACCEPTED IN IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS 13 flow,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1246–1256, 2019

    2019

  31. [31]

    Physics-based pathline clustering and exploration,

    D. B. Nguyen, L. Zhang, R. S. Laramee, D. Thompson, R. O. Monico, and G. Chen, “Physics-based pathline clustering and exploration,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 22–37, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cgf.14093

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.14093 2021

  32. [32]

    Defining coherent vortices objectively from the vorticity,

    G. Haller, A. Hadjighasem, M. Farazmand, and F. Huhn, “Defining coherent vortices objectively from the vorticity,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 795, pp. 136–173, 2016

    2016

  33. [33]

    V ortex boundary identifica- tion using convolutional neural network,

    M. Berenjkoub, G. Chen, and T. G ¨unther, “V ortex boundary identifica- tion using convolutional neural network,” in2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). Salt Lake City, UT, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2020, pp. 261–265

    2020

  34. [34]

    A CNN-based vortex identification method,

    L. Deng, Y . Wang, Y . Liu, F. Wang, S. Li, and J. Liu, “A CNN-based vortex identification method,”Journal of Visualization, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 65–78, feb 2019. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1007/s12650-018-0523-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s12650-018-0523-1 2019

  35. [35]

    A rapid vortex identification method using fully convolutional segmentation network,

    Y . Wang, D. Liang, Z. Yang, D. Zhao, and F. Wang, “A rapid vortex identification method using fully convolutional segmentation network,” The Visual Computer, vol. 37, p. 261–273, 02 2021

    2021

  36. [36]

    Eddynet: A deep neural network for pixel-wise classification of oceanic eddies,

    R. Lguensat, M. Sun, R. Fablet, P. Tandeo, E. Mason, and G. Chen, “Eddynet: A deep neural network for pixel-wise classification of oceanic eddies,” inIGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2018, pp. 1764–1767

    2018

  37. [37]

    Ocean eddy identification and tracking using neural networks,

    K. Franz, R. Roscher, A. Milioto, S. Wenzel, and J. Kusche, “Ocean eddy identification and tracking using neural networks,” in2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, 2018, pp. 6887–6890

    2018

  38. [38]

    A streampath-based rcnn approach to ocean eddy detection,

    X. Bai, C. Wang, and C. Li, “A streampath-based rcnn approach to ocean eddy detection,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 106 336–106 345, 2019

    2019

  39. [39]

    Robust reference frame extraction from unsteady 2d vector fields with convolutional neural networks,

    B. Kim and T. G ¨unther, “Robust reference frame extraction from unsteady 2d vector fields with convolutional neural networks,”Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 285–295, jun 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fcgf.13689

    2019

  40. [40]

    A visualization framework for multi-scale coherent structures in taylor-couette turbulence,

    D. B. Nguyen, R. O. Monico, and G. Chen, “A visualization framework for multi-scale coherent structures in taylor-couette turbulence,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 902–912, 2021

    2021

  41. [41]

    Understanding the structure of the turbulent mixing layer in hydrodynamic instabilities,

    D. Laney, A. Mascarenhas, P. Miller, V . Pascucciet al., “Understanding the structure of the turbulent mixing layer in hydrodynamic instabilities,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1053–1060, 2006

    2006

  42. [42]

    V ortex identification method based on topological analysis and velocity gradient invariance,

    X. Qu, R. He, and T. Wang, “V ortex identification method based on topological analysis and velocity gradient invariance,”Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 146, no. 7, p. 071111, 2024

    2024

  43. [43]

    Topological analysis of high velocity turbulent flow,

    T. Bridel-Bertomeu, B. Fovet, J. Tierny, and F. Vivodtzev, “Topological analysis of high velocity turbulent flow,” in2019 IEEE 9th Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV), 2019, pp. 87–88

    2019

  44. [44]

    V ortex axis tracking by iterative propagation (vatip): a method for analysing three-dimensional turbulent structures,

    L. Zhu and L. Xi, “V ortex axis tracking by iterative propagation (vatip): a method for analysing three-dimensional turbulent structures,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 866, p. 169–215, 2019

    2019

  45. [45]

    Klassische runge-kutta-formeln f ¨unfter und siebenter ord- nung mit schrittweiten-kontrolle,

    E. Fehlberg, “Klassische runge-kutta-formeln f ¨unfter und siebenter ord- nung mit schrittweiten-kontrolle,”Computing, vol. 4, pp. 93–106, 1969

    1969

  46. [46]

    The structure of the vorticity field in turbulent channel flow. part 1. analysis of instantaneous fields and statistical correlations,

    P. Moin and J. Kim, “The structure of the vorticity field in turbulent channel flow. part 1. analysis of instantaneous fields and statistical correlations,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 155, p. 441–464, 1985

    1985

  47. [47]

    Mean curvature skeletons,

    A. Tagliasacchi, I. Alhashim, M. Olson, and H. Zhang, “Mean curvature skeletons,”Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1735–1744, 2012

    2012

  48. [48]

    New aspects of turbulent boundary- layer structure,

    M. R. Head and P. Bandyopadhyay, “New aspects of turbulent boundary- layer structure,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 107, p. 297–338, 1981

    1981

  49. [49]

    Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer,

    S. Robinsonet al., “Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer,” Annual review of fluid mechanics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 601–639, 1991

    1991

  50. [50]

    On the dynamics of near-wall turbulence,

    C. R. Smith, J. Walker, A. Haidari, and U. Sobrun, “On the dynamics of near-wall turbulence,”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 336, no. 1641, pp. 131–175, 1991

    1991

  51. [51]

    A wall-wake model for the turbulence structure of boundary layers. part 1. extension of the attached eddy hypothesis,

    A. Perry and I. Maru ˇsi´c, “A wall-wake model for the turbulence structure of boundary layers. part 1. extension of the attached eddy hypothesis,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 298, pp. 361–388, 1995. Adeel Zafaris a Ph.D. student in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Houston. He earned an M.S. in Software Engineering from Shangha...

    1995