pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05264 · v1 · pith:VZADZ435new · submitted 2026-06-03 · 💻 cs.LG

REGEN: Reference-Guided Synthetic Multivariate Time Series Generation for Forecasting

Moulik Gupta (1) , Dhruv Kumar (1 , 2) , Murari Mandal (1 , 3) , Saurabh Deshpande (1) ((1) Birla AI Labs , (2) Birla Institute of Technology , Science
show 2 more authors
Pilani (3) Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology)
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 07:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords synthetic time series generationmultivariate forecastingreference-guided synthesisGaussian process residualsstructural causal modelperiodic backbonefoundation model pretraininglow-data regimes
0
0 comments X

The pith

ReGeN decomposes reference time series into periodic backbone, Gaussian process residuals, and structural causal model to produce synthetic data that substitutes for or exceeds real data in forecasting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that limited real multivariate time series can serve as structural scaffolds rather than black-box examples for synthesis. By breaking each reference into a phase-aligned periodic component, per-variable deep-kernel Gaussian process residuals, and lag-aware cross-variable couplings via a fitted structural causal model, the method generates controllable samples that retain domain morphology while increasing variety. Experiments show these samples train forecasters with little accuracy loss compared to real sibling data and sometimes improve it in periodic settings such as traffic. Pretraining a foundation model on the resulting corpora also beats models pretrained on prior-based or black-box synthetic alternatives. The work therefore reframes data scarcity as a problem of structural exploitation rather than sheer volume.

Core claim

ReGeN treats observed sequences as scaffolds by decomposing each into a phase-aligned periodic backbone that captures dominant domain morphology, per-variable stochastic residuals modeled with a deep-kernel Gaussian process, and lag-aware cross-variable dependencies injected through a structural causal model with fitted coupling coefficients; sampling these components at controllable temperature produces synthetic series that preserve domain-grounded structure while broadening distributional coverage.

What carries the argument

The three-component decomposition of each reference into phase-aligned periodic backbone, deep-kernel Gaussian process residuals, and structural causal model with coupling coefficients.

If this is right

  • ReGeN-generated data substitutes for real sibling data with minimal forecasting degradation.
  • In strongly periodic domains such as traffic, ReGeN data can outperform the real source itself.
  • A foundation model pretrained on ReGeN corpora outperforms models pretrained on prior-based and data-driven synthetic alternatives.
  • Controllable sampling of the decomposed components broadens distributional coverage while keeping domain structure intact.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same scaffold decomposition may allow synthetic augmentation in other sequential domains where real data are scarce.
  • If structural components can be extracted reliably, the volume of real data needed for pretraining could drop further than current low-data methods assume.
  • The relative importance of explicit periodicity and causal coupling versus raw sample count could be tested by ablating individual components in new forecasting benchmarks.

Load-bearing premise

The three-component breakdown of each reference fully captures the relevant domain morphology, local variability, and cross-variable dynamics without material information loss.

What would settle it

Train identical forecasters on ReGeN data versus real sibling sequences in a non-periodic domain and measure whether test error rises by more than a few percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05264 by 2), (2) Birla Institute of Technology, 3), (3) Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology), Dhruv Kumar (1, Moulik Gupta (1), Murari Mandal (1, Pilani, Saurabh Deshpande (1) ((1) Birla AI Labs, Science.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: REGEN pipeline overview. A: Extract a phase-aligned periodic template and compute residuals from the real multivariate time series. B: Aggregate residuals across series and apply VE-based filtering to retain reliable template–residual structure. C: Fit a CNN+LSTM encoder with an SVGP-based deep kernel prior to model residual dynamics. D: Sample template parameters and GP residuals, then combine them to rec… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: t-SNE projections of real and synthetic samples for twelve representative datasets, illustrat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Training robust multivariate time series forecasting models requires large, diverse corpora, yet many real-world domains provide only a handful of observed sequences. Existing generators fail to resolve this mismatch: prior-based approaches (e.g., CauKer, TimePFN) produce domain-agnostic samples, while data-driven methods (e.g., TimeGAN) treat references as black-box supervision, forfeiting explicit control over periodic structure, local variability, and cross-variable dynamics. We propose ReGeN, a reference-guided generative pipeline that treats observed sequences not as examples to imitate, but as structural scaffolds for controllable synthesis. ReGeN decomposes each reference into three interpretable components: a phase-aligned periodic backbone capturing dominant domain morphology; per-variable stochastic residuals modeled with a deep-kernel Gaussian process; and lag-aware cross-variable dependencies injected through a structural causal model with fitted coupling coefficients. Sampling these components at controllable temperature broadens distributional coverage while preserving domain-grounded structure. We show that ReGeN-generated data consistently substitutes for real sibling data with minimal forecasting degradation, and in strongly periodic domains such as traffic, can outperform the real source itself. We further show that a foundation model pretrained on ReGeN corpora outperforms those pretrained on prior-based and data-driven synthetic alternatives. This suggests that in low-data regimes, how reference data is structurally exploited can matter as much as how much data is available.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ReGeN, a reference-guided generative pipeline for multivariate time series that decomposes each reference sequence into a phase-aligned periodic backbone, per-variable deep-kernel Gaussian process residuals, and a lag-aware structural causal model with fitted coupling coefficients. Sampling at controllable temperature is used to broaden coverage while preserving structure. The central claims are that ReGeN-generated data substitutes for real sibling data with minimal forecasting degradation (and can outperform real data in strongly periodic domains such as traffic) and that foundation models pretrained on ReGeN corpora outperform those pretrained on prior-based or data-driven synthetic alternatives.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold and the decomposition is shown to incur no material information loss, the work could meaningfully address data scarcity in multivariate time series forecasting by supplying controllable, domain-grounded synthetic corpora. The interpretable three-component scaffold approach, as opposed to black-box imitation, would be a useful methodological contribution for low-data regimes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods description of the SCM component and the substitution experiments] The substitution and outperformance claims rest on the assertion that the three-component decomposition (phase-aligned periodic backbone + per-variable deep-kernel GP residuals + lag-aware SCM with fitted coupling coefficients) fully captures morphology, local variability, and cross-variable dynamics without material loss. However, the SCM step relies on fitted coupling coefficients within a chosen lag window and is therefore limited to linear or low-order dependencies; any nonlinear, non-stationary, or higher-order interactions not absorbed into the backbone or GP residuals would be lost, directly threatening the forecasting-substitution results. This concern is load-bearing and requires explicit validation (e.g., ablation on nonlinear synthetic benchmarks or residual analysis of cross-variable structure).
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: performance claims are stated without any quantitative results, experimental setup, baselines, datasets, or validation metrics. The full manuscript must supply these details (including tables reporting forecasting degradation or outperformance) to allow evaluation of whether the decomposition supports the asserted outcomes.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a brief parenthetical mention of the specific domains or datasets (beyond the traffic example) used to support the periodic-domain outperformance claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods description of the SCM component and the substitution experiments] The substitution and outperformance claims rest on the assertion that the three-component decomposition (phase-aligned periodic backbone + per-variable deep-kernel GP residuals + lag-aware SCM with fitted coupling coefficients) fully captures morphology, local variability, and cross-variable dynamics without material loss. However, the SCM step relies on fitted coupling coefficients within a chosen lag window and is therefore limited to linear or low-order dependencies; any nonlinear, non-stationary, or higher-order interactions not absorbed into the backbone or GP residuals would be lost, directly threatening the forecasting-substitution results. This concern is load-bearing and requires explicit validation (e.g., ablation on nonlinear synthetic benchmarks or residual analysis of cross-variable structure).

    Authors: We agree that the SCM models linear lag-aware couplings and that nonlinear or higher-order interactions must be captured elsewhere in the decomposition. The design intends for the phase-aligned backbone and deep-kernel GP residuals to absorb such effects, but we acknowledge the need for explicit validation of no material loss. We will add an ablation on nonlinear synthetic benchmarks together with residual cross-variable analysis in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: performance claims are stated without any quantitative results, experimental setup, baselines, datasets, or validation metrics. The full manuscript must supply these details (including tables reporting forecasting degradation or outperformance) to allow evaluation of whether the decomposition supports the asserted outcomes.

    Authors: The abstract is written at a high level per standard practice. The full manuscript already contains the experimental setups, baselines (CauKer, TimePFN, TimeGAN), datasets, and tables with quantitative forecasting degradation and outperformance metrics. We will revise the abstract to include selected key quantitative results for improved clarity. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: generative pipeline is a modeling choice without self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper describes a reference-guided synthesis method that decomposes time series into a periodic backbone, deep-kernel GP residuals, and an SCM with fitted couplings. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or predictions are presented that reduce by construction to the inputs or to self-citations. The substitution claims rest on empirical evaluation rather than any fitted-input-called-prediction or self-definitional step. The method is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes smuggled via prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full paper would be needed to enumerate all fitted values and background assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • coupling coefficients
    Fitted parameters in the structural causal model for cross-variable dependencies.
  • temperature
    Controllable sampling parameter that broadens distributional coverage.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Observed sequences can be decomposed into phase-aligned periodic backbone, per-variable stochastic residuals modeled with deep-kernel Gaussian process, and lag-aware cross-variable dependencies injected through a structural causal model.
    Central premise of the ReGeN pipeline stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5833 in / 1291 out tokens · 26385 ms · 2026-06-28T07:29:08.163755+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

    A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformers , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

  2. [2]

    2024 , eprint=

    Unified Training of Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformers , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  3. [3]

    2024 , eprint=

    Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  4. [4]

    2024 , eprint=

    Toto: Time Series Optimized Transformer for Observability , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  5. [5]

    2024 , eprint=

    A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  6. [6]

    International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , year=

    Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models for Time Series Forecasting , author=. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , year=

  7. [7]

    unknown , year=

    Time-Series Foundation AI Model for Value-at-Risk Forecasting , author=. unknown , year=

  8. [8]

    Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing , year=

    Transformers in Time-Series Analysis: A Tutorial , author=. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing , year=

  9. [9]

    Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

    Timepfn: Effective multivariate time series forecasting with synthetic data , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

  10. [10]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Softs: Efficient multivariate time series forecasting with series-core fusion , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  11. [11]

    Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on information & knowledge management , pages=

    Spatial-temporal identity: A simple yet effective baseline for multivariate time series forecasting , author=. Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on information & knowledge management , pages=

  12. [12]

    Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

    Msgnet: Learning multi-scale inter-series correlations for multivariate time series forecasting , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

  13. [13]

    2023 , eprint=

    Encoding Time-Series Explanations through Self-Supervised Model Behavior Consistency , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  14. [14]

    2025 , eprint=

    Exploring Representations and Interventions in Time Series Foundation Models , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  15. [15]

    2023 , eprint=

    DANLIP: Deep Autoregressive Networks for Locally Interpretable Probabilistic Forecasting , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  16. [16]

    Merton , abstract =

    Robert C. Merton , abstract =. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous , journal =. 1976 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90022-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90022-2 1976

  17. [17]

    2004 , publisher=

    Financial Modelling with Jump Processes , author=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  18. [18]

    Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Deep State Space Models for Time Series Forecasting , author=. Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  19. [19]

    ArXiv , year=

    GluonTS: Probabilistic Time Series Models in Python , author=. ArXiv , year=

  20. [20]

    IEEE Access , year=

    Time Series Prediction Based on LSTM-Attention-LSTM Model , author=. IEEE Access , year=

  21. [21]

    2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) , year=

    The Performance of LSTM and BiLSTM in Forecasting Time Series , author=. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) , year=

    2019

  22. [22]

    2020 , eprint=

    Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecasting , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    2020

  23. [23]

    Journal of Official Statistics , volume=

    STL: A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess , author=. Journal of Official Statistics , volume=

  24. [24]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=

    Gaussian Processes for Time-Series Modelling , author=. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=. 2013 , doi=

    2013

  25. [25]

    Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , series=

    Deep Kernel Learning , author=. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , series=. 2016 , url=

    2016

  26. [26]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

    Learning Scalable Deep Kernels with Recurrent Structure , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=. 2017 , url=

    2017

  27. [27]

    2006 , publisher=

    Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  28. [28]

    Neural Computation , volume=

    Long Short-Term Memory , author=. Neural Computation , volume=. 1997 , doi=

    1997

  29. [29]

    2017 , publisher=

    Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms , author=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  30. [30]

    2508.02879 , archivePrefix=

    Xie, Shifeng and Feofanov, Vasilii and Alonso, Marius and Odonnat, Ambroise and Zhang, Jianfeng and Palpanas, Themis and Zan, Lei and Pan, Lujia and Zhang, Keli and Redko, Ievgen , year=. 2508.02879 , archivePrefix=

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 , year=

    Time-series Generative Adversarial Networks , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 , year=

  32. [32]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 , year=

    ForecastPFN: Synthetically-Trained Zero-Shot Forecasting , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 , year=

  33. [33]

    Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Machine Learning and Systems , year=

    TSMix: Time Series Data Augmentation by Mixing Sources , author=. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Machine Learning and Systems , year=

  34. [34]

    2023 , eprint=

    Embarrassingly Simple MixUp for Time-series , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  35. [35]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

    Structure discovery in nonparametric regression through compositional kernel search , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2013 , organization=

    2013

  36. [36]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Autoformer: Decomposition transformers with auto-correlation for long-term series forecasting , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  37. [37]

    Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

    Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

  38. [38]

    NeurIPS Workshop on Time Series in the Age of Large Models , year=

    GIFT-Eval: A Benchmark for General Time Series Forecasting Model Evaluation , author=. NeurIPS Workshop on Time Series in the Age of Large Models , year=

  39. [39]

    This Time is Different: An Observability Perspective on Time Series Foundation Models , author=

  40. [40]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

    A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  41. [41]

    Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Unified training of universal time series forecasting transformers , author=. Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

  42. [42]

    Chronos-2: From Univariate to Universal Forecasting

    Chronos-2: From univariate to universal forecasting , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.15821 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    C-RNN-GAN: Continuous recurrent neural networks with adversarial training

    C-RNN-GAN: Continuous recurrent neural networks with adversarial training , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09904 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Real-valued (Medical) Time Series Generation with Recurrent Conditional GANs

    Real-valued (medical) time series generation with recurrent conditional gans , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02633 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    The Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Foundations of structural causal models with cycles and latent variables , author=. The Annals of Statistics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  46. [46]

    2026 , eprint=

    Zero-shot Forecasting by Simulation Alone , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  47. [47]

    NeurIPS 2023 Track on Datasets and Benchmarks , year=

    BuildingsBench: A Large-Scale Dataset of 900K Buildings and Benchmark for Short-Term Load Forecasting , author=. NeurIPS 2023 Track on Datasets and Benchmarks , year=

    2023

  48. [48]

    NeurIPS 2023 Track on Datasets and Benchmarks , year=

    SubseasonalClimateUSA: A Dataset for Subseasonal Forecasting and Benchmarking , author=. NeurIPS 2023 Track on Datasets and Benchmarks , year=

    2023

  49. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14343 , year=

    LibCity: A Unified Library Towards Efficient and Comprehensive Urban Spatial-Temporal Prediction , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14343 , year=

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05063 , year=

    Pushing the Limits of Pre-training for Time Series Forecasting in the CloudOps Domain , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05063 , year=

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecasting , author=. The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  52. [52]

    Neurocomputing , volume=

    Is Mamba Effective for Time Series Forecasting? , author=. Neurocomputing , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  53. [53]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting? , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  54. [54]

    Science Advances , volume=

    Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets , author=. Science Advances , volume=. 2019 , doi=

    2019

  55. [55]

    Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=

    DYNOTEARS: Structure Learning from Time-Series Data , author=. Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=

  56. [56]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

    Estimation of a Structural Vector Autoregression Model Using Non-Gaussianity , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

  57. [57]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 1969 , doi=

    1969

  58. [58]

    Machine Learning , volume=

    Random Forests , author=. Machine Learning , volume=. 2001 , doi=

    2001

  59. [59]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

    Visualizing Data using t-SNE , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

  60. [60]

    IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics , volume=

    The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Estimation of Power Spectra: A Method Based on Time Averaging Over Short, Modified Periodograms , author=. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics , volume=. 1967 , doi=

    1967

  61. [61]

    The American Journal of Psychology , volume=

    The Proof and Measurement of Association Between Two Things , author=. The American Journal of Psychology , volume=. 1904 , doi=

    1904