pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05299 · v1 · pith:JYOI5E7Znew · submitted 2026-06-03 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA· hep-ex

Heavy-element paleodetectors for Higgsino dark matter

Peter W. Graham , Harikrishnan Ramani , Samuel S. Y. Wong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAhep-ex
keywords paleodetectorsHiggsinoinelastic dark matterdamage tracksheavy elementsWIMP detectionradiopure minerals
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heavy-element paleodetectors using ancient minerals with lead nuclei can detect inelastic Higgsino dark matter up to mass splittings of 920 keV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a new type of paleodetector that uses ancient minerals containing heavy elements such as lead to search for damage tracks left by inelastic dark matter particles like the Higgsino. Standard paleodetectors with lighter nuclei cannot overcome the energy threshold for scattering with Higgsinos that have small mass splittings to their excited states. By using heavier targets, the kinematic threshold is lowered, allowing probes of larger splittings. Even minerals with ordinary levels of radioactivity from only 2 km depth can access new regions of parameter space because of the relatively large interaction cross section. The approach is also sensitive to the historical high-velocity tail of the dark matter distribution, which could be affected by events like the Large Magellanic Cloud's passage.

Core claim

We propose heavy-element paleodetectors as a new probe of inelastic dark matter, using ancient, radiopure minerals containing heavy elements such as lead. We identify brine precipitates from deep geothermal aquifers as a possible geological source of such minerals. This method can probe Higgsino mass splittings up to δ ≃ 920 keV. Due to the large Higgsino-nucleon cross section, even suboptimal mineral samples with ordinary radioactivity from depths of only 2 km can probe new parameter space, thus partially relaxing the stringent requirements on radiopurity and depth.

What carries the argument

Heavy-element paleodetectors: ancient minerals with heavy nuclei such as lead that record permanent damage tracks from WIMP-nucleon scattering, overcoming the kinematic threshold for inelastic scattering.

If this is right

  • Can probe Higgsino mass splittings up to approximately 920 keV.
  • Suboptimal mineral samples from depths of only 2 km with ordinary radioactivity can still probe new parameter space.
  • Paleodetectors become sensitive to the history of the dark matter high-velocity tail, including effects from the Large Magellanic Cloud's close approach 50 million years ago.
  • Younger minerals may be favored in scenarios with fast dark matter populations.
  • Requirements for radiopurity and depth are partially relaxed compared to standard paleodetector targets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar heavy-element targets could be applied to other inelastic dark matter candidates beyond the Higgsino.
  • Geological surveys for brine precipitates could identify more candidate minerals for paleodetection.
  • The method might complement direct detection experiments by providing historical information on dark matter velocities.
  • Verification would require confirming that damage tracks from Higgsino scattering are distinguishable from background tracks in these minerals.

Load-bearing premise

Suitable quantities of ancient minerals containing heavy elements like lead with sufficiently low radioactivity exist and can be obtained from geological sources such as brine precipitates.

What would settle it

No excess damage tracks observed in lead-rich ancient mineral samples from 2 km depth that would be expected for Higgsino parameters with mass splittings below 920 keV, after subtracting known backgrounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05299 by Harikrishnan Ramani, Peter W. Graham, Samuel S. Y. Wong.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Halo integrals of the SHM and LMC model (at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: For a scattered Pb nucleus in Laurionite (PbClOH): (a) the stopping power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Higgsino-induced track-length spectrum per target nucleus mass for Pb in Laurionite (PbClOH) for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Projected limit on DM-nucleon cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Paleodetectors have been proposed as a new approach to direct detection of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), through the search for damage tracks in ancient minerals induced by WIMP-nucleon scattering. However, for inelastic dark matter such as the Higgsino, existing paleodetector targets lack sufficiently heavy nuclei to overcome the kinematic threshold for scattering. We propose heavy-element paleodetectors as a new probe of inelastic dark matter, using ancient, radiopure minerals containing heavy elements such as lead. We identify brine precipitates from deep geothermal aquifers as a possible geological source of such minerals. Additionally, paleodetectors are uniquely sensitive to the history of the dark matter high-velocity tail, including a possible fast population induced by the Large Magellanic Cloud's close approach 50 Myr ago. Such a scenario would favor younger minerals than usually assumed in the paleodetector literature. This method can probe Higgsino mass splittings up to $\delta \simeq 920$ keV. Due to the large Higgsino-nucleon cross section, we find that even suboptimal mineral samples with ordinary radioactivity from depths of only 2 km can probe new parameter space, thus partially relaxing the stringent requirements on radiopurity and depth that constitute two significant challenges for the paleodetector program.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes heavy-element paleodetectors using ancient, radiopure minerals containing heavy nuclei such as lead (e.g., brine precipitates from deep geothermal aquifers) to detect inelastic WIMP-nucleon scattering from Higgsino dark matter. It claims this overcomes kinematic thresholds in existing paleodetector targets, enabling probes of Higgsino mass splittings up to δ ≃ 920 keV; due to the large cross section, even suboptimal samples with ordinary radioactivity from only 2 km depth can access new parameter space. The work also highlights unique sensitivity to the DM high-velocity tail, including possible effects from the Large Magellanic Cloud's passage ~50 Myr ago, which may favor younger minerals.

Significance. If the target minerals exist with the required properties and track detection is feasible, the proposal would extend paleodetector methods to inelastic DM scenarios that are otherwise kinematically inaccessible, while relaxing stringent radiopurity and depth requirements that limit the approach. It provides a concrete geological candidate and notes sensitivity to non-standard velocity distributions, which could distinguish this method from conventional direct detection. The idea is novel within the paleodetector literature but rests on external geological assumptions rather than new derivations or data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (kinematics section): the headline claim that the method reaches δ ≃ 920 keV is stated without an explicit derivation, velocity-distribution assumptions, recoil-energy threshold calculation, or error budget; the number appears to follow from standard inelastic kinematics and the Higgsino-nucleon cross section, but the manuscript supplies no equations or numerical steps that would allow independent verification of how 920 keV is obtained or its sensitivity to the high-velocity tail.
  2. [§4–5] §4–5 (mineral-target discussion): the assertion that ordinary-radioactivity samples from 2 km depth suffice relies on the unverified existence of >10 Myr-old, U/Th ≪ 1 ppb Pb-rich brine precipitates that preserve distinguishable nm-scale damage tracks from inelastic recoils; no mineralogical characterization, age/radiopurity data, or track-formation simulations in such matrices are provided, making the relaxation of radiopurity/depth requirements a load-bearing but unsubstantiated claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] Notation for the mass splitting δ is introduced without a clear definition equation or comparison to the standard inelastic DM parameter space.
  2. [Introduction] References to prior paleodetector work on radiopurity requirements and track etching are cited but not quantitatively compared to the proposed 2 km / ordinary-radioactivity scenario.
  3. Figure captions (if present) should explicitly state the assumed DM velocity distribution and mineral density used for the reach estimate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and positive assessment of the proposal's novelty. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and add appropriate caveats.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (kinematics section): the headline claim that the method reaches δ ≃ 920 keV is stated without an explicit derivation, velocity-distribution assumptions, recoil-energy threshold calculation, or error budget; the number appears to follow from standard inelastic kinematics and the Higgsino-nucleon cross section, but the manuscript supplies no equations or numerical steps that would allow independent verification of how 920 keV is obtained or its sensitivity to the high-velocity tail.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is needed for independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will expand §3 to include the inelastic scattering kinematics (maximum mass splitting δ_max = μ v_max²/2 − E_R^th, with reduced mass μ for Higgsino-lead), the assumed standard halo velocity distribution (truncated Maxwellian with v_esc = 544 km/s and v_0 = 220 km/s), the recoil threshold corresponding to nm-scale track registration in lead, and the numerical evaluation yielding δ ≃ 920 keV. We will also add a short discussion of sensitivity to the high-velocity tail, including the possible LMC-induced component. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4–5] §4–5 (mineral-target discussion): the assertion that ordinary-radioactivity samples from 2 km depth suffice relies on the unverified existence of >10 Myr-old, U/Th ≪ 1 ppb Pb-rich brine precipitates that preserve distinguishable nm-scale damage tracks from inelastic recoils; no mineralogical characterization, age/radiopurity data, or track-formation simulations in such matrices are provided, making the relaxation of radiopurity/depth requirements a load-bearing but unsubstantiated claim.

    Authors: The work is a theoretical proposal that identifies Pb-rich brine precipitates from deep geothermal aquifers as a candidate target on the basis of published geological literature. We do not provide new mineralogical data or simulations. In revision we will (i) expand the citations to relevant geological studies on radiopurity and age of such precipitates, (ii) add explicit caveats stating that the relaxation of depth and radiopurity requirements is conditional on the existence of suitable samples, and (iii) reference existing track-formation literature for heavy-element matrices while noting that dedicated simulations for these specific minerals remain future work. The large Higgsino-nucleon cross section is the quantitative basis for the claim that even higher-background samples can still probe new parameter space. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Empirical confirmation of the existence, age, radiopurity (U/Th ≪ 1 ppb), and nm-scale track preservation properties of the proposed Pb-rich brine precipitates, which lies outside the scope of this theoretical paper and would require dedicated geological sampling and materials characterization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on standard kinematics and external geological assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's central results—the reach δ ≃ 920 keV and the viability of 2 km depth samples—are obtained from standard inelastic scattering kinematics and Higgsino-nucleon cross sections applied to heavy nuclei (Pb). These are independent of any quantities defined or fitted inside the paper. The suggestion of brine precipitates as targets is presented as an external hypothesis without any internal derivation, fitting, or self-referential modeling that would reduce the claimed sensitivity back to paper-defined inputs. No equations, ansatze, or uniqueness theorems are shown to loop back to the paper's own results or prior self-citations in a load-bearing way. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard domain assumptions from paleodetector and dark-matter literature plus one geological source claim; no new free parameters or invented particles are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Paleodetectors can register and identify damage tracks produced by WIMP-nucleon scattering in ancient minerals.
    Invoked implicitly when stating that heavy-element minerals will enable detection; drawn from prior paleodetector program.
  • domain assumption Brine precipitates from deep geothermal aquifers constitute a viable geological source of ancient, heavy-element-bearing, sufficiently radiopure minerals.
    Central to the practical feasibility claim; stated as a possible source without supporting geological data in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5773 in / 1522 out tokens · 26360 ms · 2026-06-28T05:21:14.791445+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aalberset al.(LZ), First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys

    J. Aalberset al.(LZ), First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041002 (2023), arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Agneset al.(DarkSide-50), Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide- 50, Phys

    P. Agneset al.(DarkSide-50), Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide- 50, Phys. Rev. D107, 063001 (2023), arXiv:2207.11966 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041003 (2023), arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys

    Z. Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 011805 (2025), arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    S. Baum, A. K. Drukier, K. Freese, M. G´ orski, and P. Stengel, Searching for Dark Matter with Paleo-Detectors, Phys. Lett. B803, 135325 (2020), arXiv:1806.05991 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    A. K. Drukier, S. Baum, K. Freese, M. G´ orski, and P. Stengel, Paleo-detectors: Searching for Dark Matter with Ancient Minerals, Phys. Rev. D99, 043014 (2019), arXiv:1811.06844 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    T. D. P. Edwards, B. J. Kavanagh, C. Weniger, S. Baum, A. K. Drukier, K. Freese, M. G´ orski, and P. Stengel, Digging for dark matter: Spectral analysis and discovery potential of paleo-detectors, Phys. Rev. D99, 043541 (2019), arXiv:1811.10549 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    S. Baum, T. D. P. Edwards, K. Freese, and P. Stengel, New Projections for Dark Matter Searches with Paleo- Detectors, Instruments5, 21 (2021), arXiv:2106.06559 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Baumet al., Mineral detection of neutrinos and dark matter

    S. Baumet al., Mineral detection of neutrinos and dark matter. A whitepaper, Phys. Dark Univ.41, 101245 (2023), arXiv:2301.07118 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    A. Fung, T. Lucas, L. Balogh, M. Leybourne, and A. C. Vincent, Refining the sensitivity of new physics searches with ancient minerals, Phys. Rev. D112, 043040 (2025), arXiv:2504.08885 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Calabrese-Day, E

    A. Calabrese-Day, E. LaVoie-Ingram, K. Ream, H. Ross, J. Spitz, P. Stengel, K. Sun, and A. Takla, Toward Neu- trino and Dark Matter Detection with Ancient Miner- als: TEM Study of Heavy-Ion Tracks in Olivine, (2026), arXiv:2604.09732 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    D. P. Snowden-Ifft, E. S. Freeman, and P. B. Price, Lim- its on dark matter using ancient mica, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4133 (1995)

    1995

  13. [13]

    Krall and M

    R. Krall and M. Reece, Last Electroweak WIMP Stand- ing: Pseudo-Dirac Higgsino Status and Compact Stars as Future Probes, Chin. Phys. C42, 043105 (2018), arXiv:1705.04843 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Tucker-Smith and N

    D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D64, 043502 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0101138

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  15. [15]

    D. P. Theodosopoulos, K. Freese, C. Kelso, and P. Sten- gel, Projected Sensitivity of Paleo-Detectors to Dark Matter Effective Interactions with Nuclei, (2026), arXiv:2603.13629 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Smith-Orliket al., The impact of the Large Mag- ellanic Cloud on dark matter direct detection signals, JCAP10, 070, arXiv:2302.04281 [astro-ph.GA]

    A. Smith-Orliket al., The impact of the Large Mag- ellanic Cloud on dark matter direct detection signals, JCAP10, 070, arXiv:2302.04281 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    P. W. Graham, H. Ramani, and S. S. Y. Wong, Enhanc- ing direct detection of Higgsino dark matter, Phys. Rev. D111, 055030 (2025), arXiv:2409.07768 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Aaboud, G

    M. Aaboud, G. Aad, B. Abbott, O. Abdinov, B. Abe- loos, S. H. Abidi, O. AbouZeid, N. L. Abraham, H. Abramowicz, H. Abreu,et al., Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric states in scenarios with compressed mass spectra at s= 13 tev with the atlas detector, Physical Review D97, 052010 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    Low and L.-T

    M. Low and L.-T. Wang, Neutralino dark matter at 14 TeV and 100 TeV, JHEP08, 161, arXiv:1404.0682 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Rinchiuso, O

    L. Rinchiuso, O. Macias, E. Moulin, N. L. Rodd, and T. R. Slatyer, Prospects for detecting heavy WIMP dark matter with the Cherenkov Telescope Array: The Wino and Higgsino, Phys. Rev. D103, 023011 (2021), arXiv:2008.00692 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    N. L. Rodd, B. R. Safdi, and W. L. Xu, CTA and SWGO can discover Higgsino dark matter annihilation, Phys. 17 Rev. D110, 043003 (2024), arXiv:2405.13104 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    S. Abe, T. Inada, E. Moulin, N. L. Rodd, B. R. Safdi, and W. L. Xu, Discovering the Higgsino at CTAO-North within the Decade, (2025), arXiv:2506.08084 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Actiset al.(CTA Consortium), Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: An advanced fa- cility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astron- omy, Exper

    M. Actiset al.(CTA Consortium), Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: An advanced fa- cility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astron- omy, Exper. Astron.32, 193 (2011), arXiv:1008.3703 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    Andreev, D

    V. Andreev, D. G. Ang, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, J. Haefner, N. R. Hutzler, Z. Lasner, C. Meisenhelder, B. R. O’Leary, C. D. Panda, A. D. West, E. P. West, and X. Wu (ACME Collaboration), Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the elec- tron, Nature562, 355 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    R. T. Co, B. Sheff, and J. D. Wells, Race to find split Higgsino dark matter, Phys. Rev. D105, 035012 (2022), arXiv:2105.12142 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Menget al.(PandaX-4T Collaboration), Dark mat- ter search results from the pandax-4t commissioning run, Phys

    Y. Menget al.(PandaX-4T Collaboration), Dark mat- ter search results from the pandax-4t commissioning run, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 261802 (2021)

    2021

  27. [28]

    J. Eby, P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, and G. D. Kribs, Luminous signals of inelastic dark matter in large detectors, JHEP 09, 115, arXiv:1904.09994 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 1904

  28. [29]

    Feldstein, P

    B. Feldstein, P. W. Graham, and S. Rajendran, Lu- minous dark matter, Phys. Rev. D82, 075019 (2010), arXiv:1008.1988 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [30]

    Djurcicet al.(JUNO), JUNO Conceptual Design Re- port (2015), arXiv:1508.07166 [physics.ins-det]

    Z. Djurcicet al.(JUNO), JUNO Conceptual Design Re- port (2015), arXiv:1508.07166 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [31]

    A. K. Drukier, K. Freese, and D. N. Spergel, Detect- ing cold dark-matter candidates, Phys. Rev. D33, 3495 (1986)

    1986

  31. [32]

    Besla, A

    G. Besla, A. Peter, and N. Garavito-Camargo, The highest-speed local dark matter particles come from the Large Magellanic Cloud, JCAP11, 013, arXiv:1909.04140 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 1909

  32. [33]

    Donaldson, M

    K. Donaldson, M. S. Petersen, and J. Pe˜ narrubia, Ef- fects on the local dark matter distribution due to the large magellanic cloud, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters513, 46–51 (2022)

    2022

  33. [34]

    Patel, N

    E. Patel, N. Kallivayalil, N. Garavito-Camargo, G. Besla, D. R. Weisz, R. P. van der Marel, M. Boylan- Kolchin, M. S. Pawlowski, and F. A. G´ omez, The orbital histories of magellanic satellites using gaia dr2 proper motions, The Astrophysical Journal893, 121 (2020)

    2020

  34. [35]

    R. J. J. Grand, F. A. G´ omez, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor, V. Springel, D. J. R. Campbell, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, and S. D. M. White, The Auriga Project: the properties and formation mechanisms of disc galaxies across cos- mic time, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.467, 179 (2017), arXiv:1610.01159 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [36]

    Vogelsberger, A

    M. Vogelsberger, A. Helmi, V. Springel, S. D. M. White, J. Wang, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, A. D. Ludlow, and J. F. Navarro, Phase-space structure in the local dark matter distribution and its signature in direct detec- tion experiments, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.395, 797 (2009), arXiv:0812.0362 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [37]

    Y.-Y. Mao, L. E. Strigari, R. H. Wechsler, H.-Y. Wu, and O. Hahn, Halo-to-Halo Similarity and Scatter in the Velocity Distribution of Dark Matter, Astrophys. J. 764, 35 (2013), arXiv:1210.2721 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [38]

    Y.-Y. Mao, L. E. Strigari, and R. H. Wechsler, Con- necting Direct Dark Matter Detection Experiments to Cosmologically Motivated Halo Models, Phys. Rev. D 89, 063513 (2014), arXiv:1304.6401 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  38. [39]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, M

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, M. Lisanti, P. Madau, and L. Necib, Empirical Determination of Dark Matter Ve- locities using Metal-Poor Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 041102 (2018), arXiv:1704.04499 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [40]

    Necib, M

    L. Necib, M. Lisanti, S. Garrison-Kimmel, A. Wet- zel, R. Sanderson, P. F. Hopkins, C.-A. Faucher- Gigu` ere, and D. Kereˇ s, Under the Firelight: Stellar Tracers of the Local Dark Matter Velocity Distribution in the Milky Way 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3afc (2018), arXiv:1810.12301 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3afc 2018

  40. [41]

    Zhang, A

    X. Zhang, A. Thoyas, L. Necib, A. Wetzel, and A. Arora, Set the Night on FIRE: Building an Empir- ical Local Dark Matter Velocity Distribution, (2026), arXiv:2603.25783 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2026

  41. [42]

    P. N. Bhattiprolu, S. P. Martin, and J. D. Wells, Chas- ing higgsino dark matter at colliders in the neutrino fog era, (2025), arXiv:2512.12457 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [43]

    Kowalska and E

    K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, The discreet charm of higgsino dark matter - a pocket review, Adv. High Energy Phys.2018, 6828560 (2018), arXiv:1802.04097 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [44]

    Nagata and S

    N. Nagata and S. Shirai, Higgsino Dark Matter in High- Scale Supersymmetry, JHEP01, 029, arXiv:1410.4549 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [45]

    Arkani-Hamed and S

    N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, Supersymmet- ric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC, JHEP06, 073, arXiv:hep-th/0405159

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [46]

    G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Split supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B699, 65 (2004), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 706, 487–487 (2005)], arXiv:hep-ph/0406088

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  46. [47]

    J. D. Wells, Implications of supersymmetry breaking with a little hierarchy between gauginos and scalars (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0306127

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  47. [48]

    J. L. Gonski, P. W. Graham, S. Rajendran, H. Ra- mani, and S. S. Y. Wong, Melting LHC detectors: a novel search for stopped long-lived particles, (2025), arXiv:2512.12023 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    Ellis, J

    J. Ellis, J. Hagelin, D. Nanopoulos, K. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric relics from the big bang, Nuclear Physics B238, 453 (1984)

    1984

  49. [50]

    Bottaro, D

    S. Bottaro, D. Buttazzo, M. Costa, R. Franceschini, P. Panci, D. Redigolo, and L. Vittorio, The last com- plex WIMPs standing, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 992 (2022), arXiv:2205.04486 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  50. [51]

    Hisano, K

    J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, N. Nagata, and T. Takesako, Di- rect Detection of Electroweak-Interacting Dark Matter, JHEP07, 005, arXiv:1104.0228 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [52]

    Hisano, K

    J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, and N. Nagata, Direct Search of Dark Matter in High-Scale Supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D87, 035020 (2013), arXiv:1210.5985 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [53]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 111302 (2018), arXiv:1805.12562 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [54]

    D. S. Akeribet al.(LZ), The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Ex- periment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A953, 163047 (2020), arXiv:1910.09124 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2020

  54. [55]

    Guo, B.-L

    S.-L. Guo, B.-L. Chen, and S. A. Durrani, Solid-state 18 nuclear track detectors, inHandbook of Radioactivity Analysis, edited by M. F. L’Annunziata (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2012) 3rd ed., pp. 233–298

    2012

  55. [56]

    R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price, R. M. Walker, and E. L. Hubbard, Track registration in various solid-state nu- clear track detectors, Physical Review133, A1443 (1964)

    1964

  56. [57]

    R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price, and R. M. Walker, Tracks of charged particles in solids, Science149, 383 (1965)

    1965

  57. [58]

    R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price, and R. M. Walker, Solid- state track detectors: Applications to nuclear science and geophysics, Annual Review of Nuclear Science15, 1 (1965)

    1965

  58. [59]

    R. Hill, J. A. Notte, and L. Scipioni, inAdvances in Imaging and Electron Physics, Vol. 170, edited by P. W. Hawkes (Elsevier, 2012) pp. 65–148

    2012

  59. [60]

    Schaff, M

    F. Schaff, M. Bech, P. Zaslansky, C. Jud, M. Liebi, M. Guizar-Sicairos, and F. Pfeiffer, Six-dimensional real and reciprocal space small-angle x-ray scattering tomog- raphy, Nature527, 353 (2015)

    2015

  60. [61]

    Holler, A

    M. Holler, A. Diaz, M. Guizar-Sicairos, P. Karvinen, E. F¨ arm, E. H¨ ark¨ onen, M. Ritala, A. Menzel, J. Raabe, and O. Bunk, X-ray ptychographic computed tomogra- phy at 16 nm isotropic 3D resolution, Scientific Reports 4, 3857 (2014)

    2014

  61. [62]

    S. Baum, T. D. P. Edwards, B. J. Kavanagh, P. Stengel, A. K. Drukier, K. Freese, M. G´ orski, and C. Weniger, Paleodetectors for Galactic supernova neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D101, 103017 (2020), arXiv:1906.05800 [astro- ph.GA]

    arXiv 2020

  62. [63]

    Aalberset al.(LZ), First constraints on WIMP- nucleon effective field theory couplings in an extended energy region from LUX-ZEPLIN, Phys

    J. Aalberset al.(LZ), First constraints on WIMP- nucleon effective field theory couplings in an extended energy region from LUX-ZEPLIN, Phys. Rev. D109, 092003 (2024), arXiv:2312.02030 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  63. [64]

    P. W. Graham, J. P. Luengas Medina, H. Ramani, D. A. Tinoco Villalba, and S. S. Y. Wong, (forthcom- ing), (2026)

    2026

  64. [65]

    F. H. Stewart,Marine Evaporites, Tech. Rep. 440-Y (U.S. Geological Survey, 1963)

    1963

  65. [66]

    P. J. Wyllie, Ultramafic rocks and the upper mantle (1970)

    1970

  66. [67]

    de Marcillac, N

    P. de Marcillac, N. Coron, G. Dambier, J. Leblanc, and J.-P. Moalic, Experimental detection ofα-particles from the radioactive decay of natural bismuth, Nature422, 876 (2003)

    2003

  67. [68]

    M. G. Mayer, On closed shells in nuclei, Phys. Rev.74, 235 (1948)

    1948

  68. [69]

    Sajkowski, R

    L. Sajkowski, R. Turnbull, and K. Rogers, A review of critical element concentrations in high enthalpy geother- mal fluids in new zealand, Resources12, 10.3390/re- sources12060068 (2023)

    work page doi:10.3390/re- 2023

  69. [70]

    Ralph, D

    J. Ralph, D. Von Bargen, P. Martynov, J. Zhang, X. Que, A. Prabhu, S. M. Morrison, W. Li, W. Chen, and X. Ma, Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience re- search, American Mineralogist110, 833 (2025), eprint: https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article- pdf/110/6/833/7209752/ammin-2024-9486.1.pdf

    2025

  70. [71]

    Accessed April 1, 2026

    Mindat.org, Laurionite: Mineral information, data and localities (2026), page updated March 2, 2026. Accessed April 1, 2026

    2026

  71. [72]

    Natarajan and E

    M. Natarajan and E. A. Secco, Studies on metal hydroxy compounds. xv. electrical conductivity measurements on cd(oh)cl, cu(oh)cl, and pbohcl, Canadian Journal of Chemistry55, 3377 (1977), https://doi.org/10.1139/v77-474

    work page doi:10.1139/v77-474 1977

  72. [73]

    Regenspurg, T

    S. Regenspurg, T. Wiersberg, W. Brandt, E. Huenges, A. Saadat, K. Schmidt, and G. Zimmermann, Geochem- ical properties of saline geothermal fluids from the in- situ geothermal laboratory groß sch¨ onebeck (germany), Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry70, 3 (2010)

    2010

  73. [74]

    Y. K. Kharaka and J. S. Hanor, Deep fluids in the con- tinents: I. sedimentary basins, inTreatise on Geochem- istry(2003) Chap. 5.16, pp. 1–48

    2003

  74. [75]

    Regenspurg, D

    S. Regenspurg, D. L. Driba, and C. Zorn, Formation and significance of laurionite in geothermal brine, Envi- ronmental Earth Sciences75, 865 (2016)

    2016

  75. [76]

    Regenspurg, J

    S. Regenspurg, J. Dilling, J. Mielcarek, F. Korte, and U.-K. Schkade, Naturally occurring radionuclides and their geochemical interactions at a geothermal site in the north german basin, Environmental Earth Sciences 72, 4131 (2014)

    2014

  76. [77]

    M. A. McKibben, A. E. Williams, W. A. Elders, and C. S. Eldridge, Saline brines and metallogenesis in a modern sediment-filled rift: the salton sea geothermal system, california, u.s.a., Applied Geochemistry2, 563 (1987)

    1987

  77. [78]

    Scheiber, A

    J. Scheiber, A. Seibt, J. Birner, A. Genter, and W. Moeckes, Application of a scaling inhibitor system at the geothermal power plant in soultz-sous-forˆ ets: Lab- oratory and on-site studies, inEuropean Geothermal Congress EGC(2013)

    2013

  78. [79]

    Hassani and W

    K. Hassani and W. Zheng, A review of recent advances in mineral scaling in geothermal energy systems: mech- anisms, mitigation, and case studies, Environmental Earth Sciences84, 418 (2025)

    2025

  79. [80]

    Bl¨ ocher, T

    G. Bl¨ ocher, T. Reinsch, J. Henninges, H. Milsch, S. Re- genspurg, J. Kummerow, H. Francke, S. Kranz, A. Saa- dat, G. Zimmermann, and E. Huenges, Hydraulic his- tory and current state of the deep geothermal reservoir groß sch¨ onebeck, Geothermics63, 27 (2016), enhanced Geothermal Systems: State of the Art

    2016

  80. [81]

    Pauwels, S

    J. Pauwels, S. Salah, M. Vasile, B. Laenen, and V. Cap- puyns, Characterization of scaling material obtained from the geothermal power plant of the balmatt site, mol, Geothermics94, 102090 (2021)

    2021

Showing first 80 references.