pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05457 · v1 · pith:SY6MTBN2new · submitted 2026-06-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Interplay of non-local transport and local scattering during electron thermalization and spatial equilibration in laser-excited metals

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 04:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords electron thermalizationnon-local transportlocal scatteringlaser-excited metalsBoltzmann transport equationspatial equilibrationultrafast dynamicsnonequilibrium electrons
0
0 comments X

The pith

In laser-excited metals, electron transport makes thermalization appear faster at the surface but delays full system equilibration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reformulates the Boltzmann transport equation in energy space to track both non-local transport and local scattering after ultrafast laser excitation of metals. It establishes that transport removes athermal carriers from the irradiated surface, which accelerates the apparent thermalization seen there, while the same redistribution of carriers slows the complete equilibration of the entire electron system. The work examines energy-dependent signals at front and back surfaces and shows that which process dominates changes with location and energy window. A reader would care because these dynamics control how experiments on laser-driven materials are interpreted and how nonequilibrium electrons behave in real devices.

Core claim

Transport accelerates the apparent thermalization observed at the irradiated surface by removing athermal carriers, while the same spatial redistribution delays complete equilibration of the full electron system. The dominant process varies with position and with the energetic window examined.

What carries the argument

Reformulation of the Boltzmann transport equation in energy space that describes both spatial equilibration and scattering through full collision integrals.

If this is right

  • Transport dominates the observed thermalization rate at the irradiated front surface.
  • Scattering plays a larger relative role in certain energy windows at the back surface.
  • Energy-dependent probes at different positions reveal different balances between the two processes.
  • The findings apply directly to optically thick samples where spatial effects cannot be ignored.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ultrafast models used for predicting material response may need separate tracking of surface and bulk relaxation times.
  • Similar transport-scattering competition could appear in laser-excited semiconductors or thin films.
  • Hot-electron devices may experience longer effective recovery times than local models predict.
  • Comparing front-surface and transmission signals offers a direct experimental test of the position dependence.

Load-bearing premise

The reformulation of the Boltzmann transport equation in energy space consistently describes both spatial equilibration and scattering through full collision integrals without additional approximations that would alter the interplay.

What would settle it

Time-resolved measurements of the electron energy distribution at the front surface versus the back surface that compare the apparent thermalization time at the surface against the time required for global equilibration across the sample.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05457 by Baerbel Rethfeld, Christopher Seibel, Markus Uehlein, Sebastian T. Weber, Tobias Held.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustrations of the model structure. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Surface thermalization times extracted from calcu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Athermal carrier density (ACD), see eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spectral densities, calculated with eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Change of the spectral densities, see eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Initial nonequilibrium distributions in various depth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Influence of different assumptions for electron-phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Temperature in dependence of depth at 80 fs and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Electron distribution at 25 fs compared to an initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Deviation from equilibrium shown as the normalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultrafast laser excitation of metals induces electronic nonequilibrium both in space and locally in the energy distribution. The subsequent dynamics are governed by the interplay between non-local transport and local scattering of hot electrons, yet combined microscopic descriptions of these processes remain sparse. Here, we disentangle the influence of these processes on thermalization using a reformulation of the Boltzmann transport equation in energy space that consistently describes both spatial equilibration and scattering through full collision integrals. Our results reveal that transport accelerates the apparent thermalization observed at the irradiated surface by removing athermal carriers, while the same spatial redistribution delays complete equilibration of the full electron system. We analyze the experimentally accessible energy-dependent dynamics at the front and back surface and find that the dominant process varies, depending on both position and on the energetic window. Overall, our work improves the understanding of the interplay of electronic nonequilibrium processes occurring in optically thick laser-driven systems with relevant implications for future electronic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a reformulation of the Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) in energy space for laser-excited metals. It claims this approach consistently incorporates both non-local spatial transport and local scattering via full collision integrals, without additional approximations. The central result is that transport accelerates apparent thermalization at the irradiated surface by removing athermal carriers, while the same redistribution delays complete equilibration of the entire electron system. The work further analyzes position- and energy-dependent dynamics at front and back surfaces.

Significance. If the energy-space reformulation is shown to preserve the full collision integrals and non-local terms exactly, the results would clarify the competing roles of transport and scattering in ultrafast nonequilibrium dynamics, with direct relevance to time-resolved experiments on optically thick samples and to applications in ultrafast electronics and materials processing.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (energy-space reformulation of the BTE): The central claim that the reformulation 'consistently describes both spatial equilibration and scattering through full collision integrals' without altering the transport-scattering interplay requires an explicit derivation showing that the change of variables and any moment integration over momentum space introduce no averaging or neglected higher-order spatial derivatives that would decouple local scattering from non-local redistribution. Without this step-by-step verification, the reported acceleration of surface thermalization versus delay of global equilibration does not follow directly from the numerics.
  2. [§3–4] §3–4 (numerical results on thermalization times): The quantitative statements that transport 'accelerates the apparent thermalization observed at the irradiated surface' and 'delays complete equilibration of the full electron system' rest on the validity of the reformulation; any implicit approximation in the energy-space collision integrals would undermine the separation of the two effects and the position-dependent dominance analysis.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §1] Abstract and §1: The statement that the method uses 'full collision integrals' should be accompanied by a brief reference to the explicit form retained after the energy-space transformation.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (e.g., those showing front/back surface dynamics): Add explicit labels for the energetic windows and time scales used to distinguish transport-dominated versus scattering-dominated regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (energy-space reformulation of the BTE): The central claim that the reformulation 'consistently describes both spatial equilibration and scattering through full collision integrals' without altering the transport-scattering interplay requires an explicit derivation showing that the change of variables and any moment integration over momentum space introduce no averaging or neglected higher-order spatial derivatives that would decouple local scattering from non-local redistribution. Without this step-by-step verification, the reported acceleration of surface thermalization versus delay of global equilibration does not follow directly from the numerics.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit step-by-step derivation would improve clarity. The reformulation begins from the momentum-space BTE with explicit spatial dependence retained; the change of variables to energy space is performed without integrating over momentum or introducing spatial averaging, and the collision integrals remain local and unchanged in form. No higher-order spatial derivatives are neglected. We will add a dedicated appendix in the revised manuscript providing this full derivation, confirming that the transport-scattering interplay is preserved exactly as claimed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3–4] §3–4 (numerical results on thermalization times): The quantitative statements that transport 'accelerates the apparent thermalization observed at the irradiated surface' and 'delays complete equilibration of the full electron system' rest on the validity of the reformulation; any implicit approximation in the energy-space collision integrals would undermine the separation of the two effects and the position-dependent dominance analysis.

    Authors: The numerical results follow directly from solving the reformulated equation. Once the explicit derivation is included as noted above, the separation of transport and scattering effects will be rigorously justified. We will add a brief clarifying paragraph in §§3–4 that references the new appendix and explains how the position-dependent dominance arises from the consistent treatment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained in standard BTE reformulation

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a reformulation of the Boltzmann transport equation in energy space that is presented as consistently incorporating full collision integrals and non-local transport without additional approximations that would force the claimed interplay. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes are quoted that reduce any prediction or result to the inputs by construction. The central claims follow from numerical solution of the reformulated equation rather than from definitional equivalence or load-bearing self-reference. This matches the default case of a self-contained modeling paper with no detectable circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields minimal ledger entries; the central modeling rests on the standard applicability of the Boltzmann equation to the described system.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Boltzmann transport equation with full collision integrals applies to the nonequilibrium electron system in laser-excited metals
    Invoked as the basis for the energy-space reformulation that treats both transport and scattering.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5710 in / 1088 out tokens · 25246 ms · 2026-06-28T04:53:32.972628+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hot electron lifetimes in metals probed by time-resolved two-photon photoemission,

    M. Bauer, A. Marienfeld, and M. Aeschlimann, “Hot electron lifetimes in metals probed by time-resolved two-photon photoemission,” Progress in Surface Science, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 319 – 376, 2015. [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0079681615000192

  2. [2]

    The 2025 roadmap to ultrafast dynamics: frontiers of theoretical and compu- tational modeling,

    F. Caruso, M. A. Sentef, C. Attaccalite, M. Bonitz, C. Draxl, U. De Giovannini, M. Eckstein, R. Ernstorfer, M. Fechner, M. Gr¨ uninget al., “The 2025 roadmap to ultrafast dynamics: frontiers of theoretical and compu- tational modeling,” Journal of Physics: Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 012501, 2026

  3. [3]

    Spin-lasers: spintronics beyond magnetoresistance,

    “Spin-lasers: spintronics beyond magnetoresistance,” Solid State Communications, vol. 316-317, p. 113949,

  4. [4]

    Available: https://www.sciencedirect

    [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0038109820301472

  5. [5]

    Modelling ultrafast laser ablation,

    B. Rethfeld, D. S. Ivanov, M. E. Garcia, and S. I. Anisi- mov, “Modelling ultrafast laser ablation,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 50, no. 19, p. 193001, 2017

  6. [6]

    Ultrafast hot electron dynamics in plasmonic nanostruc- tures: experiments, modelling, design,

    A. Schirato, M. Maiuri, G. Cerullo, and G. Della Valle, “Ultrafast hot electron dynamics in plasmonic nanostruc- tures: experiments, modelling, design,” Nanophotonics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2023

  7. [7]

    Plasmon-induced hot carrier science and technology,

    M. L. Brongersma, N. J. Halas, and P. Nordlander, “Plasmon-induced hot carrier science and technology,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–34, Jan 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/ nnano.2014.311

  8. [8]

    Femtosecond-tunable measurement of electron thermalization in gold,

    C.-K. Sun, F. Vall´ ee, L. H. Acioli, E. P. Ippen, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Femtosecond-tunable measurement of electron thermalization in gold,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 50, pp. 15 337–15 348, Nov 1994

  9. [9]

    Time-resolved thermoreflectivity of thin gold films and its dependence on film thickness,

    J. Hohlfeld, J. G. M¨ uller, S.-S. Wellershoff, and E. Matthias, “Time-resolved thermoreflectivity of thin gold films and its dependence on film thickness,” Appl. Phys. B, vol. 64, pp. 387–390, 1997

  10. [10]

    Ballistic electron transport in Au films,

    X. Liu, R. Stock, and W. Rudolph, “Ballistic electron transport in Au films,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 72, p. 195431, Nov 2005. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.195431

  11. [11]

    Electron thermalization in gold,

    W. S. Fann, R. Storz, H. W. K. Tom, and J. Bokor, “Electron thermalization in gold,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 46, pp. 13 592–13 595, Nov 1992

  12. [12]

    Tracking the Time Evolution of the Electron Distribution Func- tion in Copper by Femtosecond Broadband Op- tical Spectroscopy,

    M. Obergfell and J. Demsar, “Tracking the Time Evolution of the Electron Distribution Func- tion in Copper by Femtosecond Broadband Op- tical Spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 124, p. 037401, Jan 2020. [Online]. Available: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.037401

  13. [13]

    The 2021 ultrafast spectroscopic probes of condensed matter roadmap,

    J. Lloyd-Hughes, P. M. Oppeneer, T. Pereira dos Santos, A. Schleife, S. Meng, M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, A. Rubio, I. Radu, M. Murnane, X. Shi, H. Kapteyn, B. Stadtm¨ uller, K. M. Dani, F. H. da Jornada, E. Prinz, M. Aeschlimann, R. L. Milot, M. Burdanova, J. Boland, T. Cocker, and F. Hegmann, “The 2021 ultrafast spectroscopic probes of condensed matt...

  14. [14]

    Ultrafast transport and energy relaxation of hot electrons in Au/Fe/MgO(001) heterostruc- tures analyzed by linear time-resolved photoelec- tron spectroscopy,

    F. K¨ uhne, Y. Beyazit, B. Sothmann, J. Jaya- balan, D. Diesing, P. Zhou, and U. Boven- siepen, “Ultrafast transport and energy relaxation of hot electrons in Au/Fe/MgO(001) heterostruc- tures analyzed by linear time-resolved photoelec- tron spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 4, p. 033239, Sep 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103...

  15. [15]

    Timescales in the response of materi- als to femtosecond laser excitation,

    B. Rethfeld, K. Sokolowski-Tinten, D. von der Linde, and S. I. Anisimov, “Timescales in the response of materi- als to femtosecond laser excitation,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 767– 769, 2004

  16. [16]

    Superdif- fusive spin transport as a mechanism of ultrafast demag- netization,

    M. Battiato, K. Carva, and P. M. Oppeneer, “Superdif- fusive spin transport as a mechanism of ultrafast demag- netization,” Physical review letters, vol. 105, no. 2, p. 027203, 2010

  17. [17]

    Competing thermalization pathways of photoexcited hot electrons,

    C. Seibel, T. Held, M. Uehlein, and B. Rethfeld, “Competing thermalization pathways of photoexcited hot electrons,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2604.09236

  18. [18]

    Theoretical approaches for the description of plasmon generated hot carriers phenomena,

    M. Vanzan and M. Marsili, “Theoretical approaches for the description of plasmon generated hot carriers phenomena,” npj Computational Materials, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 222, Sep 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41524-024-01412-5

  19. [19]

    E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids. Academic Press, 1985

  20. [20]

    Dressel and G

    M. Dressel and G. Gr¨ uner, Electrodynamics of Solids: Optical Properties of Electrons in Matter. Cambridge University Press, 2002

  21. [21]

    Nonequi- librium optical properties of transition metals upon ul- trafast electron heating,

    E. B´ evillon, R. Stoian, and J. P. Colombier, “Nonequi- librium optical properties of transition metals upon ul- trafast electron heating,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 30, no. 38, p. 385401, aug 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aad8e5

  22. [22]

    Time- resolved two-photon photoemission from Cu (100): En- ergy dependence of electron relaxation,

    C. Schmuttenmaer, M. Aeschlimann, H. Elsayed-Ali, R. Miller, D. Mantell, J. Cao, and Y. Gao, “Time- resolved two-photon photoemission from Cu (100): En- ergy dependence of electron relaxation,” Physical Review B, vol. 50, no. 12, p. 8957, 1994

  23. [23]

    Spatio-Temporal Electron Propagation Dynam- ics in Au/Fe/MgO(001) in Nonequilibrium: Revealing Single Scattering Events and the Ballistic Limit,

    M. Heckschen, Y. Beyazit, E. Shomali, F. K¨ uhne, J. Jayabalan, P. Zhou, D. Diesing, M. E. Gruner, R. Pentcheva, A. Lorke, B. Sothmann, and U. Boven- siepen, “Spatio-Temporal Electron Propagation Dynam- ics in Au/Fe/MgO(001) in Nonequilibrium: Revealing Single Scattering Events and the Ballistic Limit,” PRX Energy, vol. 2, p. 043009, 2023

  24. [24]

    Ultrafast dynamics of nonequilibrium electrons in met- als under femtosecond laser irradiation,

    B. Rethfeld, A. Kaiser, M. Vicanek, and G. Simon, “Ultrafast dynamics of nonequilibrium electrons in met- als under femtosecond laser irradiation,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 65, no. 21, p. 214303, 2002

  25. [25]

    Relaxation dynamics in laser-excited metals under nonequilibrium conditions,

    B. Y. Mueller and B. Rethfeld, “Relaxation dynamics in laser-excited metals under nonequilibrium conditions,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, no. 3, p. 035139, 2013

  26. [26]

    Time-Resolved Spectral Den- sities of Nonthermal Electrons in Gold,

    C. Seibel, M. Uehlein, T. Held, P. N. Terekhin, S. T. Weber, and B. Rethfeld, “Time-Resolved Spectral Den- sities of Nonthermal Electrons in Gold,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 127, pp. 23 349–23 358, 2023

  27. [27]

    Ultrafast dynamics of electrons and phonons: from the two-temperature model 10 to the time-dependent Boltzmann equation,

    F. Caruso and D. Novko, “Ultrafast dynamics of electrons and phonons: from the two-temperature model 10 to the time-dependent Boltzmann equation,” Advances in Physics: X, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2095925, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149. 2022.2095925

  28. [28]

    Collapse of electron–phonon coupling due to nonthermal phonon populations,

    T. Held, C. Seibel, M. Uehlein, S. T. Weber, and B. Rethfeld, “Collapse of electron–phonon coupling due to nonthermal phonon populations,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 37, no. 47, p. 47LT01, nov 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ae1a2b

  29. [29]

    Dynamics of excited electrons in cop- per and ferromagnetic transition metals: Theory and ex- periment,

    R. Knorren, K. H. Bennemann, R. Burgermeister, and M. Aeschlimann, “Dynamics of excited electrons in cop- per and ferromagnetic transition metals: Theory and ex- periment,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 61, pp. 9427–9440, Apr 2000

  30. [30]

    Boltzmann transport calculation of collinear spin trans- port on short timescales,

    D. M. Nenno, S. Kaltenborn, and H. C. Schneider, “Boltzmann transport calculation of collinear spin trans- port on short timescales,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 94, pp. 115 102–1–115 102–7, 2016

  31. [31]

    Contribution of Ballistic Electron Transport to Energy Transfer During Electron- Phonon Nonequilibrium in Thin Metal Films,

    P. E. Hopkins and P. M. Norris, “Contribution of Ballistic Electron Transport to Energy Transfer During Electron- Phonon Nonequilibrium in Thin Metal Films,” Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 131, no. 4, p. 043208, 02 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3072929

  32. [32]

    Scattering and the Boltzmann relaxation equation,

    A. Gu´ enault and D. Macdonald, “Scattering and the Boltzmann relaxation equation,” Physica, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 309–323, 1964. [Online]. Available: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0031891464900047

  33. [33]

    Electron relax- ation in metals: Theory and exact analytical solutions,

    V. V. Kabanov and A. Alexandrov, “Electron relax- ation in metals: Theory and exact analytical solutions,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 78, no. 17, p. 174514, 2008

  34. [34]

    Capturing non-equilibrium electron dynamics in metals accurately and efficiently,

    M. Uehlein, H. T. Snowden, C. Seibel, T. Held, S. T. Weber, R. J. Maurer, and B. Rethfeld, “Capturing non-equilibrium electron dynamics in metals accurately and efficiently,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 138, no. 6, p. 063103, 08 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0276556

  35. [35]

    Thermalization of optically excited fermi systems: Electron-electron collisions in solid metals,

    S. Roden, C. Seibel, T. Held, M. Uehlein, S. T. Weber, and B. Rethfeld, “Thermalization of optically excited fermi systems: Electron-electron collisions in solid metals,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 33, no. 5, p. 053906, 05 2026. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0312335

  36. [36]

    Spin polariza- tion of secondary electrons in transition metals: Theory,

    D. R. Penn, S. P. Apell, and S. Girvin, “Spin polariza- tion of secondary electrons in transition metals: Theory,” Physical Review B, vol. 32, no. 12, p. 7753, 1985

  37. [37]

    Nonequilibrium electron dynamics in noble metals,

    N. Del Fatti, C. Voisin, M. Achermann, S. Tzortzakis, D. Christofilos, and F. Vall´ ee, “Nonequilibrium electron dynamics in noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 61, no. 24, pp. 16 956–16 966, 2000

  38. [38]

    Influence of band occupation on electron-phonon coupling in gold,

    T. Held, S. T. Weber, and B. Rethfeld, “Influence of band occupation on electron-phonon coupling in gold,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 37, no. 9, p. 095001, 2025

  39. [39]

    From Code to Figure: A FAIR-Aligned Data Provenance Chain for Reproducible Simulation Research in Numerical Physics,

    M. Uehlein, T. Held, C. Seibel, L. G. Jonda, B. Rethfeld, and S. T. Weber, “From Code to Figure: A FAIR-Aligned Data Provenance Chain for Reproducible Simulation Research in Numerical Physics,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25944

  40. [40]

    Electron mean free path in elemental metals,

    D. Gall, “Electron mean free path in elemental metals,” Journal of applied physics, vol. 119, no. 8, 2016

  41. [41]

    Algorithm for the determination of in- trinsic optical constants of metal films: applications to aluminium,

    A. D. Raki´ c, “Algorithm for the determination of in- trinsic optical constants of metal films: applications to aluminium,” Appl. Opt., vol. 34, no. 22, pp. 4755–4767, 1995

  42. [42]

    D. R. Lide, G. Baysinger, L. I. Berger, R. N. Goldberg, H. V. Kehiaian, K. Kuchitsu, G. Rosenblatt, D. L. Roth, and D. Zwillinger, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC press, 2005

  43. [43]

    Local and Nonlocal Electron Dynamics of Au/Fe/MgO (001) Het- erostructures Analyzed by Time-Resolved Two-Photon Photoemission Spectroscopy,

    Y. Beyazit, J. Beckord, P. Zhou, J. Meyburg, F. K¨ uhne, D. Diesing, M. Ligges, and U. Bovensiepen, “Local and Nonlocal Electron Dynamics of Au/Fe/MgO (001) Het- erostructures Analyzed by Time-Resolved Two-Photon Photoemission Spectroscopy,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 125, no. 7, p. 076803, 2020

  44. [44]

    Influ- ence of Electronic Non-Equilibrium on Energy Dis- tribution and Dissipation in Aluminum Studied with an Extended Two-Temperature Model,

    M. Uehlein, S. T. Weber, and B. Rethfeld, “Influ- ence of Electronic Non-Equilibrium on Energy Dis- tribution and Dissipation in Aluminum Studied with an Extended Two-Temperature Model,” Nanomaterials, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1655, 2022

  45. [45]

    Primary data for competition between electron thermalization and spatial equilibration in laser- excited metals,

    M. Uehlein, T. Held, C. Seibel, S. T. Weber, and B. Rethfeld, “Primary data for competition between electron thermalization and spatial equilibration in laser- excited metals,” Jun. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20512643

  46. [46]

    Kittel, Einf¨ uhrung in die Festk¨ orperphysik, 15th ed

    C. Kittel, Einf¨ uhrung in die Festk¨ orperphysik, 15th ed. M¨ unchen: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2013

  47. [47]

    Importance of a finite speed of heat propagation in met- als irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses,

    J. J. Klossika, U. Gratzke, M. Vicanek, and G. Simon, “Importance of a finite speed of heat propagation in met- als irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 10 277–10 279, 1996. 11 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 energy E − EF (eV) 10−8 10−6 10−4 10−2 0.5 1 − 10−2 1 − 10−4 1 − 10−6 1 − 10−8 electron distribution z = 0.5 nm z = 25.5...

  48. [48]

    The calculations are initial- ized with an exponential temperature profile matching the energy density of the distributions in fig

    We assume a constant thermal conductivity of κ= 237 J m−1 s−1 K−1 [45]. The calculations are initial- ized with an exponential temperature profile matching the energy density of the distributions in fig. 7. Figure 9 shows the temperature in dependence of depth at 80 fs and 150 fs. We published a video showing the whole time evolution of the temperature in...