pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05745 · v1 · pith:GQYCZDIWnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

Optimal convex approximation of quantum channels based on α-affinity

Liqiang Zhang , Chengling Fu , Liuyong Cheng , Guohui Yang , Changshui Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 01:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum channel approximationalpha-affinityconvex hullsingle-qubit channelsChoi-Jamiolkowski isomorphismSU(2)-covariant channelsPauli channelsamplitude damping
0
0 comments X

The pith

A distance metric from α-affinity and Choi isomorphism yields closed-form optimal convex approximations for single-qubit unitary channels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a distance on quantum channels from the α-affinity combined with the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism and verifies it meets the axioms of a channel distance. It then frames the problem of finding the closest point in the convex hull of a given family of channels and solves the resulting optimization analytically for single-qubit unitaries. Closed-form expressions are obtained both for the optimal mixing weights and for the achieved minimal distance when the target is approximated by the SU(2)-covariant family or by the Pauli family. The same framework produces an explicit optimal approximation for the amplitude-damping channel. The construction supplies an analytically tractable alternative to diamond-norm methods when only certain channels can be realized in an experiment.

Core claim

Analytical solutions exist for the optimal convex approximation of single-qubit unitary channels over the SU(2)-covariant and Pauli channel families, giving closed-form expressions for the optimal parameters and the minimal α-affinity distance; the framework also yields the explicit optimal approximation for the amplitude-damping channel.

What carries the argument

The channel distance metric induced by the α-affinity and the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism, which defines the error to the convex hull of implementable channels.

If this is right

  • Optimal mixing parameters and minimal distances become computable by direct substitution rather than numerical search.
  • Every single-qubit unitary possesses an explicitly known best approximation inside the SU(2)-covariant family and inside the Pauli family.
  • The amplitude-damping channel possesses an explicitly known optimal convex approximation under the same distance.
  • The method supplies concrete guidance for experimental channel implementation when only the listed families are realizable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optimization may remain solvable for other low-dimensional channel families whose convex hulls admit simple parametrizations.
  • Resource measures defined via this distance could be evaluated exactly on the optimal approximations rather than bounded.
  • Experimental design could incorporate the closed-form expressions to select the nearest realizable channel without running optimization routines.

Load-bearing premise

The α-affinity together with the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism defines a valid distance on quantum channels.

What would settle it

Direct numerical evaluation of the α-affinity distance between a chosen unitary and every convex combination of the approximating family, checking whether any combination produces a strictly smaller value than the claimed optimum.

read the original abstract

Determining the minimal distance between a target channel and a convex hull of predefined set of implementable channels is a fundamental problem in quantum resource theory, and provides key guidance for experimental implementations. In this work, we develop a unified analytical framework for optimal convex approximation of quantum channels based on the quantum $\alpha$-affinity measure. We construct a channel distance metric induced by the {\alpha}-affinity and the ChoiJamiolkowski isomorphism, which satisfies the required properties of a well-defined channel distance. Subsequently, we present an optimization framework for the convex approximation of quantum channels, and derive analytical solutions for the optimal convex approximation of single-qubit unitary channels over both the SU(2)-covariant and Pauli channel families, obtaining closed-form expressions for the optimal parameters and the minimal approximation distance. This framework is further applied to the amplitude-damping channel, yielding the explicit form of its optimal approximation and the associated minimal {\alpha}-affinity distance. In contrast to conventional approaches based on the diamond norm, our framework provides a systematic and analytically tractable approach to quantum channel approximation under realistic constraints.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified analytical framework for optimal convex approximation of quantum channels based on the quantum α-affinity measure. It constructs a channel distance metric induced by the α-affinity and the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism (asserted to satisfy standard distance properties), presents an optimization framework, and derives closed-form expressions for the optimal parameters and minimal distances when approximating single-qubit unitary channels over the SU(2)-covariant and Pauli families; the framework is also applied to the amplitude-damping channel.

Significance. If the metric construction is valid and the derivations correct, the work supplies an analytically tractable alternative to diamond-norm methods for channel approximation in quantum resource theory, yielding explicit solutions that could guide experimental implementations under convex constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the α-affinity + CJ-isomorphism construction 'satisfies the required properties of a well-defined channel distance' (non-negativity, identity of indiscernibles, triangle inequality, monotonicity) is stated without any derivation, proof, or verification; this is the single load-bearing assumption on which the entire optimization framework and all closed-form optimality claims rest.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no error analysis, numerical verification, or comparison against the diamond norm is provided for the claimed closed-form solutions or minimal distances, leaving the practical accuracy of the analytical expressions untested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the identification of these important points regarding the metric construction and validation. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the α-affinity + CJ-isomorphism construction 'satisfies the required properties of a well-defined channel distance' (non-negativity, identity of indiscernibles, triangle inequality, monotonicity) is stated without any derivation, proof, or verification; this is the single load-bearing assumption on which the entire optimization framework and all closed-form optimality claims rest.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is required to support the claim. The properties follow from the corresponding axioms satisfied by the α-affinity on quantum states together with the structure-preserving features of the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism, but these steps are not spelled out in the current text. We will add a dedicated subsection immediately after the definition of the channel distance that supplies complete proofs of non-negativity, identity of indiscernibles, the triangle inequality, and monotonicity under completely positive trace-preserving maps. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no error analysis, numerical verification, or comparison against the diamond norm is provided for the claimed closed-form solutions or minimal distances, leaving the practical accuracy of the analytical expressions untested.

    Authors: The manuscript’s main contribution consists of exact closed-form expressions obtained by solving the convex optimization problem analytically; consequently there are no truncation or approximation errors in the reported solutions themselves. To provide practical validation, we will append a new section containing numerical evaluations of the derived minimal α-affinity distances for representative SU(2)-covariant and Pauli-channel cases, together with direct comparisons against the corresponding diamond-norm distances computed via semidefinite programming. This will allow readers to assess agreement between the two metrics on concrete instances. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: distance construction and optimization are independent of target results

full rationale

The paper defines a channel distance via α-affinity on Choi operators under the CJ isomorphism, asserts (without self-reference) that it meets standard metric axioms, then applies an optimization framework to obtain closed-form approximations for specific channels. No step reduces a claimed prediction or optimality result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the analytical solutions are derived from the defined distance rather than presupposing the final expressions. The load-bearing validity of the distance properties is an external assumption, not a definitional loop or renamed fit. This is a standard non-circular derivation structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted or audited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5732 in / 931 out tokens · 27004 ms · 2026-06-28T01:28:53.635334+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chitambar, E., Gour, G.: Quantum resource theories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.025001

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.025001 2019

  2. [2]

    Lami, L., Regula, B., Wang, X., Nichols, R., Winter, A., Adesso, G.: Gaussian quantum resource theories. Phys. Rev. A 98, 022335 (2 018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022335

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022335

  3. [3]

    Liu, Z.W., Bu, K.F., Takagi, R.: One-shot operational quan- tum resource theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 020401 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.020401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.020401 2019

  4. [4]

    Yunger Halpern, N., Kothakonda, N.B.T., Haferkamp, J., Munson, A., Eisert, J., Faist, P.: Resource theory of quantum uncomplexity. Phys. Rev. A 106, 062417 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.062417

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.062417 2022

  5. [5]

    Friedenberger, A., Lutz, E.: Assessing the quantumness of a damped two-level system. Phys. Rev. A 95, 022101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.022101

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.022101 2017

  6. [6]

    Quantum Inf

    Li, M., Dong, Y.R., Zhang, R.Q., et al.: A note on the lower bounds of ge nuine multipartite entanglement concurrence. Quantum Inf. Process. 23, 397 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-024-04607-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04607-3 2024

  7. [7]

    Vedral, V., Plenio, M.B., Rippin, M.A., Knight, P.L.: Quantifying entangle ment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2275

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2275 1997

  8. [8]

    Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 2009

  9. [9]

    Pl´ avala, M., G¨ uhne, O.: Contextuality as a precondition for quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 100201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.100201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.100201 2024

  10. [10]

    Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smo lin, J.A., Wootters, W.K.: Purification of noisy entanglement and faith- ful teleportation via noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (19 96). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.722

  11. [11]

    Peng, L.C., Wu, D., Zhong, H.S., Luo, Y.H., Li, Y., Hu, Y., Jiang, X., Che n, M.C., Li, L., Liu, N.L., Nemoto, K., Munro, W.J., Sanders, B.C., Lu, C.-Y., Pa n, J.-W.: Cloning of quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 210 502 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.210502 19

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.210502 2020

  12. [12]

    De Martini, F.: Amplification of quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev . Lett. 81, 2842 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2842

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.2842 1998

  13. [13]

    Navascu´ es, M., Wolfe, E., Rosset, D., Pozas-Kerstjens, A.: G enuine net- work multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240505 (2 020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.240505

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.240505

  14. [14]

    Wang, X.G.: Quantum teleportation of entangled coherent stat es. Phys. Rev. A 64, 022302 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022302

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.022302 2001

  15. [15]

    Hofer, S.G., Hammerer, K.: Entanglement-enhanced time-cont inuous quantum control in optomechanics. Phys. Rev. A 91, 033822 (201 5). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.033822

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.91.033822

  16. [16]

    Shen, Z.X., Wang, K.K., Fei, S.M.: Parameterized monogamy and poly gamy relations of multipartite entanglement. Chin. Phys. B 32, 120303 (2 023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/acf300

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1056/acf300

  17. [17]

    Olsthoorn, B.: Persistent homology of quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. B 107, 115174 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115174

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.115174 2023

  18. [18]

    Pachhal, S., Agarwala, A.: Entanglement signatures of a per- colating quantum system. Phys. Rev. B 110, L041112 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L041112

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.l041112 2024

  19. [19]

    Xiong, C., Kumar, A., Huang, M., Das, S., Sen, U., Wu, J.: Partial co herence and quantum correlation with fidelity and affinity distances. Phys. Rev. A 99, 032305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032305

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032305 2019

  20. [20]

    Sipe, J.E., Arkani-Hamed, N.: Characterizing quantum coherenc e. Phys. Rev. A 46, 2317 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.2317

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.46.2317 1992

  21. [21]

    Schumacher, B., Westmoreland, M.D.: Quantum privacy and quan tum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5695 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5695

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5695 1998

  22. [22]

    Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M., Plenio, M.B.: Quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.140401 2014

  23. [23]

    Qiu, W.Y., Cheng, X.H., Chen, A.X., Lan, Y.H., Nie, W.J.: Controlling quan tum coherence and entanglement in cavity magnomechanical systems. Phys. Rev. A 105, 063718 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.063718

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.105.063718 2022

  24. [24]

    Sperling, J., Walmsley, I.A.: Quasiprobability representation of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. A 97, 062327 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062327

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062327 2018

  25. [25]

    Mondal, D., Pramanik, T., Pati, A.K.: Nonlocal advantage of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. A 95, 010301(R) (2017). 20 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.010301

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.010301 2017

  26. [26]

    Luo, S.L., Sun, Y.: Quantum coherence versus quantum uncert ainty. Phys. Rev. A 96, 022130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.022130

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.96.022130 2017

  27. [27]

    Yao, Y., Xiao, X., Ge, L., Sun, C.P.: Quantum coherence in multipart ite systems. Phys. Rev. A 92, 022112 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022112

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022112 2015

  28. [28]

    Prech, K., Potts, P.P., Landi, G.T.: Role of quantum coherence in kinetic uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 020401 (202 5). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.020401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.020401

  29. [29]

    Zhu, L.T., Zhu, X.Y., Yue, Z.C., Tu, T., Li, C.F.: Coherence-protect ed opera- tions in hybrid superconducting circuit-magnon system. Chin. Phys . B 34, 030302 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ada550

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ada550 2025

  30. [30]

    Song, X.K., Huang, Y.Q., Ling, J.J., Yung, M.H.: Quantifying quantum coherence in experimentally observed neutrino oscillations. Phys. Rev. A 98, 05 0302(R) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.050302

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.050302 2018

  31. [31]

    Yu, C.S.: Quantum coherence via skew information and its polygam y. Phys. Rev. A 95, 042337 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.042337

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042337 2017

  32. [32]

    Piani, M., Cianciaruso, M., Bromley, T.R., Napoli, C., Johnston, N., Ad esso, G.: Robustness of asymmetry and coherence of quantum states. Ph ys. Rev. A 93, 042107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042107

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.042107 2016

  33. [33]

    Albarelli, F., Mazelanik, M., Lipka, M., Streltsov, A., Parniak, M., Dem kowicz- Dobrza´ nski, R.: Quantum asymmetry and noisy multimode interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 240504 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.240504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.240504 2022

  34. [34]

    Kwon, H., Park, C.Y., Tan, K.C., Ahn, D., Jeong, H.: Coherence, as ym- metry, and quantum macroscopicity. Phys. Rev. A 97, 012326 (20 18). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.012326

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.012326

  35. [35]

    Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T., Vedral, V.: The clas sical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures. Rev. M od. Phys. 84, 1655–1707 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1655

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1655 2012

  36. [36]

    Wetterich, C.: Quantum correlations for the metric. Phys. Rev . D 95, 123525 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.123525

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.123525 2017

  37. [37]

    Guo, Y.N., Chen, X.J., Peng, H.P., Tian, Q.L.: Average correlation as a resource of quantum teleportation. Phys. Rev. A 112, 052403 ( 2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/lmdx-dk95

    work page doi:10.1103/lmdx-dk95 2025

  38. [38]

    J., Cid, C.: Threshold (Q,P) distillation of multipartite quantum correlations

    Gupta, S., Munro, W. J., Cid, C.: Threshold (Q,P) distillation of multipartite quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Res. 8, L012036 (2 026). 21 https://doi.org/10.1103/6zdc-j51g

    work page doi:10.1103/6zdc-j51g

  39. [39]

    cambridge un iversity press, Cambridge (2018)

    Watrous, J.: The Theory of quantum information. cambridge un iversity press, Cambridge (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    Szalay, S.: Multipartite entanglement measures. Phys. Rev. A 9 2, 042329 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.042329

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042329 2015

  41. [41]

    Li, S., Yue, Y., Hu, Y., Gong, R.Y., Zhao, Q., Peng, Z., Ian, H., Song, P., Xiang, Z.L., Zhang, J.: Efficient convex optimization for bosonic state tomog raphy. Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 064051 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/55gp-mfg6

    work page doi:10.1103/55gp-mfg6 2025

  42. [42]

    Fagiano, L., Khammash, M.: Simulation of stochastic systems via p olynomial chaos expansions and convex optimization. Phys. Rev. E 86, 03670 2 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.036702

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.86.036702 2012

  43. [43]

    Liang, X.B., Li, B., Fei, S.M.: Complete characterization of qubit mas king. Phys. Rev. A 100, 030304(R) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.030304

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.100.030304 2019

  44. [44]

    F.: Optimal convex approximations of quantum state s

    Sacchi, M. F.: Optimal convex approximations of quantum state s. Phys. Rev. A 96, 042325 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.042325

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.96.042325 2017

  45. [45]

    Results in Physics 49, 106510 (2023)

    Li, B., Liang, X.B., Fei, S.M.: Characterizing the superposition of ar bitrary ran- dom quantum states and a known quantum state. Results in Physics 49, 106510 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106510

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106510 2023

  46. [46]

    Liang, X.B., Li, B., Huang, L., Ye, B.L., Fei, S.M., Huang, S.X.: Optimal a pprox- imations of available states and a triple uncertainty relation. Phys. R ev. A 101, 062106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.062106

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.062106 2020

  47. [47]

    Shang, J., G¨ uhne, O.: Convex optimization over classes of mul- tiparticle entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 050506 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.050506

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.050506 2018

  48. [48]

    Quantum Inf

    Liang, X.B., Li, B., Ye, B.L., Fei, S.M., Li-Jost, X.: Complete optimal co nvex approximations of qubit states under B2 distance. Quantum Inf. Process. 17, 185 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-1948-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-018-1948-0 2018

  49. [49]

    Europhysics Le tters 136, 20002 (2022)

    Zhou, H.Q., Gao, T., Yan, F.L.: Optimal convex approximation of qu bit states and geometry of completely represented states. Europhysics Le tters 136, 20002 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ac3362

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ac3362 2022

  50. [50]

    Zhang, L.Q., Du, Y.D., Yu, C.S.: Optimal convex approximations of q ubit states based on l1-norm of coherence. Chin. Phys. B 34, 080302 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/adeb5d

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1056/adeb5d 2025

  51. [51]

    J.: Quantumness of quantum c hannels

    Shahbeigi, F., Akhtarshenas, S. J.: Quantumness of quantum c hannels. Phys. Rev. A 98, 042313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.042313 22

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042313 2018

  52. [52]

    Duvenhage, R.: Optimal quantum channels. Phys. Rev. A 104, 0 32604 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.032604

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.104.032604 2021

  53. [53]

    S., Roychowdhury, V.: Qu antum approx- imation of normalized Schatten norms and applications to learning

    Chen, Y.Y., Miyahara, H., Bouchard, L. S., Roychowdhury, V.: Qu antum approx- imation of normalized Schatten norms and applications to learning. Ph ys. Rev. A 106, 052409 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.052409

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.052409 2022

  54. [54]

    Sacchi, M.F., Sacchi, T.: Convex approximations of quantum chan nels. Phys. Rev. A 96, 032311 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.032311

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.96.032311 2017

  55. [55]

    Pucha/suppress la, Z., Pawela, /suppress L., Krawiec, A., Kukulski, R.: Strategies for optimal single- shot discrimination of quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. A 98, 04 2103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.042103

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042103 2018

  56. [56]

    Fang, K., Fawzi, H., Fawzi, O.: Adversarial quantum channel disc rimination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 260201 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/mtbj-grbk

    work page doi:10.1103/mtbj-grbk 2025

  57. [57]

    F.: Optimal discrimination of quantum operations

    Sacchi, M. F.: Optimal discrimination of quantum operations. Phy s. Rev. A 71, 062340 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062340

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.71.062340 2005

  58. [58]

    De Palma, G., Trevisan, D.: Quantum optimal transport with quantum channels. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 22, 3199-3234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-021-01042-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00023-021-01042-3 2021

  59. [59]

    Bae, J., Chru´ sci´ nski, D.: Operational Characterization of D ivis- ibility of Dynamical Maps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 050403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.050403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.050403 2016

  60. [60]

    Wang, X., Wilde, M.: Resource theory of asymmetric distinguisha- bility for quantum channels. Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033169 (2019 ). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033169

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033169 2019

  61. [61]

    Fang, K., Gour, G., Wang, X.: Towards the ultimate limits of quantu m chan- nel discrimination and quantum communication. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 68 , 180509 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-024-4488-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4488-0 2025

  62. [62]

    Zhou, Y., Yung, M.H.: Interaction-free measurement as quan- tum channel discrimination. Phys. Rev. A 96, 062129 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.062129

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.96.062129 2017

  63. [63]

    Sedl´ ak, M., Ziman, M.: Optimal single-shot strategies for discrim i- nation of quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. A 90, 052312 (2014 ). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.052312

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.052312 2014

  64. [64]

    F., Skrzypczyk, P.: Operational interpretation o f weight-based resource quantifiers in convex quantum resource theories

    Ducuara, A. F., Skrzypczyk, P.: Operational interpretation o f weight-based resource quantifiers in convex quantum resource theories. Phys . Rev. Lett. 125, 110401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.110401 23

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.110401 2020

  65. [65]

    Quantum Information Processing 21, 339 ( 2022)

    Fan, Y.J., Guo, X., Yang, X.Y.: Quantifying coherence of quantum chan- nels via trace distance. Quantum Information Processing 21, 339 ( 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-022-03683-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03683-7 2022

  66. [66]

    G., Lamberti, P

    Bussandri, D. G., Lamberti, P. W., ˙Zyczkowski, K.: Transmission distance in the space of quantum channels. Phys. Rev. A 108, 012604 (2023 ). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.012604

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.108.012604 2023

  67. [67]

    K., Sankaranarayanan , R.: Quantum coherence measure based on affinity

    Muthuganesan, R., Chandrasekar, V. K., Sankaranarayanan , R.: Quantum coherence measure based on affinity. Physics Letters A 394, 1272 05 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127205

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127205 2021

  68. [68]

    Quantum Information Processing 20, 98 (2 021)

    Zhang, J., Sheng, Y.H., Tao, Y.H., Fei, S.M.: Ordering states of l1 norm and α -affinity of coherence. Quantum Information Processing 20, 98 (2 021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-021-03026-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-021-03026-y

  69. [69]

    Quantum Information Processing 23, 100 (2024)

    Fan, J.R., Wu, Z.Q., Fei, S.M.: Quantifying coherence of quantum ch annels based on the generalized α -z-relative R´ enyi entropy. Quantum Information Processing 23, 100 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-024-04309-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04309-w 2024

  70. [70]

    Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis 17, 2 2 (2023)

    Zhang, T., Qi, X.F.: α -z-R´ enyi relative entropy related quantities and their preservers. Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis 17, 2 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43037-023-00248-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s43037-023-00248-3 2023

  71. [71]

    The European Physical Journal D 79, 46 (2025)

    Wang, Y.Z., Hao, L.H., Cheng, C., Sun, Y.J.: Quantifying coherence of quantum channels based on the α -affinity. The European Physical Journal D 79, 46 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-025-00995-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053-025-00995-y 2025

  72. [72]

    Muthuganesan, R., Chandrasekar, V K.: Measurement-induce d non- locality based on affinity. Commun. Theor. Phys. 72, 075103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/ab8a26

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ab8a26 2020

  73. [73]

    Holevo, A.S.: The Choi–Jamiolkowski forms of quantum gaussian c hannels. J. Math. Phys. 52, 042202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3581879

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3581879 2011

  74. [74]

    Spr inger, New York (2010)

    Forst, W., Hoffmann, D.: Optimization-Theory and practice. Spr inger, New York (2010). ISBN 10:0387789766 24

    2010