pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06180 · v2 · pith:TC6NYHC4new · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Vector charmonium(-like) states in the energy range of 4.1-4.6 GeV

Xiang-Kun Dong , Vadim Baru , Leon von Detten , Feng-Kun Guo , Christoph Hanhart , Teng Ji , Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner , Alexey Nefediev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords charmoniumcoupled channelsheavy quark spin symmetryexotic statesthreshold effectsBESIIIvector resonancesdynamical poles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupled-channel effects from open-charm thresholds account for the structures in vector charmonium states between 4.1 and 4.6 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a unified coupled-channel framework to address the tension between inclusive and exclusive measurements of vector charmonium-like states in the 4.1-4.6 GeV range. It incorporates S-wave open-charm channels constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry along with optional bare poles and final-state interactions. Simultaneous fits to several BESIII cross sections demonstrate that a purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia already captures the gross features of the data. This indicates that the line shapes arise from strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles. The framework also explores possible heavy-quark spin partners of exotic states.

Core claim

The measured line shapes can be understood in terms of strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles, and even the purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia captures the gross features of the analyzed distributions.

What carries the argument

Unified coupled-channel framework for 1-- resonances incorporating S-wave open-charm channels D D1, D* D1, D* D2* constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry, optional bare poles, and final-state interactions in Zc channels.

If this is right

  • The purely dynamical scheme reproduces the main features of the cross sections and invariant mass distributions.
  • Inclusion of bare states for ψ(4160) and ψ(4415) improves fit quality but does not change the dynamical interpretation.
  • The model allows discussion of heavy-quark spin partners of the exotic 1-- states.
  • Threshold effects resolve the discrepancy between inclusive R-value and exclusive measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model is correct, similar coupled-channel dynamics may explain structures in other hidden-charm regions.
  • Experimental searches for the predicted spin partners would provide a direct test of the framework.
  • Extending the model to include more channels could refine predictions for line shapes in additional final states.

Load-bearing premise

The S-wave open-charm channels dominate the dynamics in this energy region and are sufficiently constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the line shapes cannot be reproduced without significant contributions from other partial waves or channels would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

The spectrum of vector charmonium(-like) states in the 4.1\dash4.6~GeV energy region exhibits a long-standing tension between inclusive and exclusive measurements. While the inclusive $R$-value indicates only conventional vector charmonia such as $\psi(4160)$ and $\psi(4415)$, exclusive $e^+e^-$ cross sections reveal additional structures whose parameters strongly depend on the observed final states when fitted with Breit--Wigner functions. This puzzling pattern suggests that coupled-channel and threshold effects play an essential role. In this work, we develop a unified coupled-channel framework for the $1^{--}$ resonances in this energy region. The framework incorporates the $S$-wave open-charm channels $D\bar{D}_1$, $D^*\bar{D}_1$, and $D^*\bar{D}_2^*$ constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry, optional bare poles associated with $\psi(4160)$ and $\psi(4415)$, and final-state interactions in the $Z_c$ channels. We perform simultaneous fits to the BESIII cross sections for $e^+e^-\to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$, $h_c\pi^+\pi^-$, $D\bar{D}^*\pi$, $D^*\bar{D}^*\pi$, $J/\psi\eta$, and $\chi_{c0}\omega$, together with invariant-mass distributions exhibiting the $Z_c(3900)$ and $Z_c(4020)$ structures. The benchmark models differ in the number of bare seed states and the fitting strategy. We show that even the purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia captures the gross features of the analyzed distributions. The inclusion of bare compact states improves the fit quality but does not change the conclusion that the measured line shapes can be understood in terms of strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles. We also discuss possible heavy-quark spin partners of the exotic $1^{--}$ states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified coupled-channel framework for 1-- charmonium(-like) states in the 4.1-4.6 GeV region. It incorporates the S-wave open-charm channels D D1, D* D1, and D* D2* (constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry), optional bare poles for ψ(4160) and ψ(4415), and final-state interactions in the Zc channels. Simultaneous fits are performed to BESIII cross sections for e+e- → J/ψπ+π-, hcπ+π-, D D*π, D* D*π, J/ψη, and χc0ω, plus invariant-mass distributions for Zc(3900) and Zc(4020). The central result is that even the purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia reproduces the gross features of the data via dynamically generated poles, while adding bare states improves fit quality but does not alter the dynamical interpretation.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work offers a resolution to the inclusive-exclusive tension by attributing final-state-dependent structures to coupled-channel threshold effects rather than additional resonances. The simultaneous multi-channel fit strategy and explicit comparison of dynamical versus seeded models are strengths that allow direct assessment of the role of bare poles. The discussion of possible heavy-quark spin partners also adds value for future experimental searches.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model setup (Section on channel selection and HQSS constraints)] Model setup (Section on channel selection and HQSS constraints): The conclusion that dynamical poles from the three specified S-wave channels explain the line shapes rests on the assumption that these channels dominate and that omitted contributions (e.g., DD or D*D* in S- or P-wave, or additional thresholds) are negligible near 4.1-4.6 GeV. No quantitative test of the truncation's impact is described; if non-negligible, the generated poles could be artifacts of the restricted channel space rather than a robust dynamical explanation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the dynamical scheme 'captures the gross features' would be strengthened by a brief mention of the achieved χ²/dof or visual fit quality metrics for the benchmark models.
  2. Notation: ensure consistent use of overlines or bars for antiparticles across all channel labels and equations.
  3. Figure captions: clarify whether the plotted curves include only the dynamical contribution or also the optional bare-pole terms for each benchmark model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The conclusion that dynamical poles from the three specified S-wave channels explain the line shapes rests on the assumption that these channels dominate and that omitted contributions (e.g., DD or D*D* in S- or P-wave, or additional thresholds) are negligible near 4.1-4.6 GeV. No quantitative test of the truncation's impact is described; if non-negligible, the generated poles could be artifacts of the restricted channel space rather than a robust dynamical explanation.

    Authors: The three S-wave channels (D D1, D* D1, D* D2*) are chosen as they represent the dominant couplings for 1-- states allowed by heavy-quark spin symmetry near the relevant thresholds (approximately 4.28-4.42 GeV). Channels such as DD or D*D* in S-wave lie at lower energies but do not couple directly in the same symmetry multiplets or are suppressed by angular momentum barriers in the vector sector; P-wave contributions are further suppressed near threshold. The simultaneous fit to six cross sections and two invariant-mass distributions with few parameters yields a good description, supporting that the truncation captures the essential dynamics. We acknowledge that an explicit test with additional channels would strengthen the claim and will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing the channel selection rationale, expected suppression of omitted contributions, and the limitations of the current setup. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central claim that dynamical scheme captures features reduces to success of fit to the same data

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We show that even the purely dynamical scheme without bare charmonia captures the gross features of the analyzed distributions. [...] the measured line shapes can be understood in terms of strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles."

    The framework parameters are fixed by simultaneous fits to the BESIII cross sections for e+e- to J/ψπ+π-, hcπ+π-, D D*π, D* D*π, J/ψη, χc0ω and the Zc invariant-mass distributions. The statements that the scheme 'captures the gross features' and that the line shapes 'can be understood in terms of' the coupled-channel poles are therefore descriptions of the fit outcome rather than independent results.

full rationale

The paper sets up a coupled-channel model with parameters constrained by HQSS, performs simultaneous fits to the listed cross sections and distributions, and then states that the purely dynamical version captures the gross features and that the line shapes are understood via coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the 'capture' and 'understanding' statements are direct consequences of adjusting the model parameters to the analyzed data rather than an independent derivation or external benchmark. No parameter-free prediction or machine-checked result is invoked. The assumption about channel dominance is stated but not shown to be independently verified outside the fit. This produces partial circularity for the central claim while leaving room for the model to have physical motivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on heavy-quark spin symmetry to relate the open-charm channels, the assumption that only S-wave channels matter, and the choice of which bare poles to include; multiple fit parameters are adjusted to the data.

free parameters (2)
  • bare pole positions and couplings for psi(4160) and psi(4415)
    Optional parameters introduced when bare states are included; their values are adjusted during the simultaneous fits.
  • channel couplings and cutoff parameters
    Parameters controlling the strength of coupled-channel interactions and regularization, fitted to the cross sections.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Heavy-quark spin symmetry constrains the couplings among the D D1, D* D1, and D* D2* channels
    Invoked to reduce the number of independent parameters in the coupled-channel framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5937 in / 1214 out tokens · 24369 ms · 2026-06-28T00:39:13.870298+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 90 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Belle collaboration, Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B± → K ±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262001 [hep-ex/0309032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  2. [2]

    Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons , Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons , Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 214

    1964

  3. [3]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 2 , in DEVELOPMENTS IN THE QUARK THEORY OF HADRONS. VOL. 1. 1964 - 1978 , D.B. Lichtenberg and S.P. Rosen, eds., pp. 22–101 (1964)

    1964

  4. [4]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics , Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 189

    1985

  5. [5]

    Lebed, R.E

    R.F. Lebed, R.E. Mitchell and E.S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93 (2017) 143 [1610.04528]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni and A.D. Polosa, Multiquark Resonances, Phys. Rept. 668 (2017) 1 [1611.07920]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y , Z, and related states , PTEP 2016 (2016) 062C01 [1603.09229]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Ali, J.S

    A. Ali, J.S. Lange and S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97 (2017) 123 [1706.00610]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 015004 [1705.00141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Olsen, T

    S.L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 015003 [1708.04012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Guo, X.-H

    F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu and S. Sakai, Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112 (2020) 103757 [1912.07030]

    arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Brambilla et al., The XY Z states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives , Phys

    N. Brambilla et al., The XY Z states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives , Phys. Rept. 873 (2020) 1 [1907.07583]

    arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules , Progr. Phys. 41 (2021) 65 [2101.01021]

    arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states , Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2023) 026201 [2204.02649]

    arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang and S.-L. Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules , Phys. Rept. 1019 (2023) 1 [2204.08716]

    arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu and L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rep. 1108 (2024) 2368 [2404.06399]

    arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    J.-H. Chen, J. Chen, F.-K. Guo, Y.-G. Ma, C.-P. Shen, Q.-Y. Shou et al., Production of exotic hadrons in pp and nuclear collisions , Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36 (2025) 55 [2411.18257]. – 36 –

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states , Front

    Z.-G. Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states , Front. Phys. (Beijing) 21 (2026) 016300 [2502.11351]

    arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    X. Wang, X. Liu and Y. Gao, Colloquium: Hadron production in open-charm meson pairs at e+e- colliders , Rev. Mod. Phys. 98 (2026) 021001 [2502.15117]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    X. Dai, S. Jia, A. Nefediev, J. Nieves, C. Shen and L. Zhang, Exotic hadrons associated with b-quark, 2603.09315

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Wang and Q

    Q. Wang and Q. Zhao, A Short Review of the Vector Charmonium-Like State ψ(4230), Chin. Phys. Lett. 42 (2025) 110201 [2508.05304]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Bai, D.-Y

    Z.-Y. Bai, D.-Y. Chen, Qi-Huang, X. Liu, S.-Q. Luo and J.-Z. Wang, Unquenched Charmonium and Beyond , 2602.19887

    arXiv

  23. [23]

    Uglov, Y.S

    T.V. Uglov, Y.S. Kalashnikova, A.V. Nefediev, G.V. Pakhlova and P.N. Pakhlov, Exclusive open-charm near-threshold cross sections in a coupled-channel approach , JETP Lett. 105 (2017) 1 [1611.07582]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Hüsken, R.E

    N. Hüsken, R.E. Mitchell and E.S. Swanson, K-matrix analysis of e+e− annihilation in the bottomonium region, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 094013 [2204.11915]

    arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Hüsken, R.F

    N. Hüsken, R.F. Lebed, R.E. Mitchell, E.S. Swanson, Y.-Q. Wang and C.-Z. Yuan, Poles and poltergeists in e+e− → D ¯D data, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 114010 [2404.03896]

    arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of the near-threshold e+e− → D∗±D∗∓ cross section using initial-state radiation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 092001 [hep-ex/0608018]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    BaBar collaboration, Study of the Exclusive Initial-State Radiation Production of the D anti-D System , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 111105 [hep-ex/0607083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  28. [28]

    CLEO collaboration, Measurement of Charm Production Cross Sections in e+e− Annihilation at Energies between 3.97 and 4.26 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 072001 [0801.3418]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    Dong, L.-L

    X.-K. Dong, L.-L. Wang and C.-Z. Yuan, Derived Born cross sections of e+e− annihilation into open charm mesons from CLEO-c measurements , Chin. Phys. C 42 (2018) 043002 [1711.07311]

    arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    BaBar collaboration, Exclusive Initial-State-Radiation Production of the D ¯D, D∗ ¯D and D∗ ¯D∗ Systems, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 092001 [0903.1597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  31. [31]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → D(∗)+ s D(∗)− s cross sections near threshold using initial-state radiation , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 011101 [1011.4397]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    BaBar collaboration, Exclusive Production of D+ s D− s , D∗+ s D− s , and D∗+ s D∗− s via e+e− Annihilation with Initial-State-Radiation , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 052004 [1008.0338]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  33. [33]

    Belle collaboration, Angular analysis of the e+e− → D(∗)±D∗∓ process near the open charm threshold using initial-state radiation , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 012002 [1707.09167]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurements of the e+e− → D∗+D∗− and e+e− → D∗+D− processes at center-of-mass energies from 4.085 to 4.600 GeV , JHEP 05 (2022) 155 [2112.06477]

    arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    BESIII collaboration, Precise Measurement of the e+e− → D∗+ s D∗− s Cross Sections at Center-of-Mass Energies from Threshold to 4.95 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 151903 [2305.10789]. – 37 –

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    BESIII collaboration, Precise Measurement of the e+e− → D+ s D− s Cross Section at Center-of-Mass Energies from Threshold to 4.95 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 261902 [2403.14998]

    arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    BESIII collaboration, Precise Measurement of Born Cross Sections for e+e− → D ¯D at s =3.80-4.95 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 081901 [2402.03829]

    arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Xue, H.-J

    S.-R. Xue, H.-J. Jing, F.-K. Guo and Q. Zhao, Disentangling the role of the Y (4260) in e+e− → D∗ ¯D∗ and D∗ s ¯D∗ s via line shape studies , Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 402 [1708.06961]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Nakamura, X.H

    S.X. Nakamura, X.H. Li, H.P. Peng, Z.T. Sun and X.R. Zhou, Global coupled-channel analysis of e+e− → c¯c processes in √s = 3.75 to 4.7 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025) 054027 [2312.17658]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of the e +e→ π+πω process at center-of-mass energies between 4.0 and 4.6 GeV , JHEP 08 (2023) 159 [2303.09718]

    arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    BaBar collaboration, Observation of a broad structure in the π+π−J/ψ mass spectrum around 4.26 GeV/ c2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 142001 [hep-ex/0506081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  42. [42]

    CLEO collaboration, Confirmation of the Y (4260) resonance production in ISR , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 091104 [hep-ex/0611021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  43. [43]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → π+π−J/ψ cross-section via initial state radiation at Belle , Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 182004 [0707.2541]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  44. [44]

    BESIII collaboration, Evidence of Two Resonant Structures in e+e− → π+π−hc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 092002 [1610.07044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    BESIII collaboration, Evidence of a resonant structure in the e+e− → π+D0D∗− cross section between 4.05 and 4.60 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 102002 [1808.02847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of e+e− → γωJ/ψ and Observation of X(3872) → ωJ/ψ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 232002 [1903.04695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurements of e+e− → ωχc0 form √s = 4.178 to 4.278 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 091103 [1903.02359]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of cross sections for e+e− → µ+µ− at center-of-mass energies from 3.80 to 4.60 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 112009 [2007.12872]

    arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of the process e+e− → π0π0J/ψ and neutral charmonium-like state Zc(3900)0, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 012009 [2004.13788]

    arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurement of e+e− → π+π−(3686) from√s = 4.0076 to 4.6984 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 052012 [2107.09210]

    arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of the Y (4230) and evidence for a new vector charmoniumlike state Y (4710) in e+e− → K 0 SK 0 SJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 092005 [2211.08561]

    arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    BESIII collaboration, Study of the resonance structures in the process e+e+ → π+π−J/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 072001 [2206.08554]

    arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of the Y (4230) and a new structure in e+e− → K +K −J/ψ, Chin. Phys. C 46 (2022) 111002 [2204.07800]

    arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → ηJ/ψ cross section from √s = 3.808 GeV to 4.951 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 092012 [2310.03361]. – 38 –

    arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of Three Charmoniumlike States with J P C = 1 −− in e+e− → D∗0D∗−π+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 121901 [2301.07321]

    arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    BESIII collaboration, Partial Wave Analysis of e+e− → π+π−J/ψ and Cross Section Measurement of e+e− → π±Zc(3900)∓ from 4.1271 to 4.3583 GeV , arXiv (2025) [2505.13222]

    arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    BESIII collaboration, Precise measurement of the e+e− → π+π−J/ψ cross section at center-of-mass energies from 3.77 to 4.60 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 092001 [1611.01317]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → π+π−D+D− cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 4.190 to 4.946 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 052012 [2208.00099]

    arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → γχc0,c1,c2 cross sections at center-of-mass energies between 3.77 and 4.60 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 092001 [2107.03604]

    arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → π+π−ψ(2S) via Initial State Radiation at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 112007 [1410.7641]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  61. [61]

    BaBar collaboration, Study of the reaction e+e− → ψ(2S)π−π− via initial-state radiation at BaBar , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 111103 [1211.6271]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    BESIII collaboration, Cross section measurement of e+e− → π0π0ψ(3686) from √s = 4.008 GeV to 4.951 GeV , arXiv (2026) [ 2601.02136]

    arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of Structures in the Processes e+e− → ωχc1 and ωχc2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 161901 [2401.14720]

    arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    BES collaboration, Determination of the ψ(3770), ψ(4040), ψ(4160) and ψ(4415) resonance parameters, eConf C070805 (2007) 02 [0705.4500]

    arXiv 2007

  65. [65]

    Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

    2024

  66. [66]

    LHCb collaboration, Observation of a resonance in B+ → K +µ+µ− decays at low recoil , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 112003 [1307.7595]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure in e+e− → π+π−J/ψ at √s = 4.26 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 252001 [1303.5949]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure Zc(4020) and Search for the Zc(3900) in e+e− → π+π−hc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 242001 [1309.1896]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    BESIII collaboration, Confirmation of a charged charmoniumlike state Zc(3885)∓ in e+e− → π±(D ¯D∗)∓ with double D tag, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 092006 [1509.01398]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    BESIII collaboration, Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e− → (D∗ ¯D∗)±π∓ at √s = 4.26 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 132001 [1308.2760]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    Osterheld et al., Measurements of Total Hadronic and Inclusive D∗ Cross-sections in e+e− Annihilations Between 3.87 GeV and 4.5 GeV ,

    A. Osterheld et al., Measurements of Total Hadronic and Inclusive D∗ Cross-sections in e+e− Annihilations Between 3.87 GeV and 4.5 GeV ,

  72. [72]

    BES collaboration, Measurements of the cross-section for e+e− → hadrons at center-of-mass energies from 2 GeV to 5 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 101802 [hep-ex/0102003]. – 39 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  73. [73]

    von Detten, V

    L. von Detten, V. Baru, C. Hanhart, Q. Wang, D. Winney and Q. Zhao, How many vector charmoniumlike states lie in the mass range 4.2-4.35 GeV? , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 116002 [2402.03057]

    arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Close and P.R

    F.E. Close and P.R. Page, Gluonic charmonium resonances at BaBar and BELLE? , Phys. Lett. B 628 (2005) 215 [hep-ph/0507199]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  75. [75]

    Kou and O

    E. Kou and O. Pene, Suppressed decay into open charm for the Y (4260) being an hybrid , Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 164 [hep-ph/0507119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  76. [76]

    Zhu, The Possible interpretations of Y (4260), Phys

    S.-L. Zhu, The Possible interpretations of Y (4260), Phys. Lett. B 625 (2005) 212 [hep-ph/0507025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  77. [77]

    Llanes-Estrada, Y (4260) and possible charmonium assignment , Phys

    F.J. Llanes-Estrada, Y (4260) and possible charmonium assignment , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 031503 [hep-ph/0507035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  78. [78]

    Qiao, One explanation for the exotic state Y(4260) , Phys

    C.-F. Qiao, One explanation for the exotic state Y(4260) , Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 263 [hep-ph/0510228]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  79. [79]

    Dubynskiy and M.B

    S. Dubynskiy and M.B. Voloshin, Hadro-Charmonium, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 344 [0803.2224]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  80. [80]

    Ding, Are Y (4260) and Z + 2 (4250) D1D or D0D∗ Hadronic Molecules?, Phys

    G.-J. Ding, Are Y (4260) and Z + 2 (4250) D1D or D0D∗ Hadronic Molecules?, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 014001 [0809.4818]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.