Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 118 references

Spatiotemporal Imputation with Graph-Informed Flow Matching

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A graph-informed prior built from filtered observations replaces the Gaussian starting point in flow matching to simplify spatiotemporal imputation.

desk verdict GiFlow swaps a graph-derived prior into flow matching for imputation and pairs it with a hybrid attention-propagation field; the paper claims this beats prior methods on synthetic and real data. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.06682 v1 pith:2FMMOOUA submitted 2026-06-04 cs.LG

Zepeng Zhang , Aref Einizade , Jhony H. Giraldo , Olga Fink This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LG
keywords spatiotemporalimputationflowmatchinggraph-informedpriormissingdatagenerativemodelsattentionmechanismsgraphpropagation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops GiFlow to fill gaps in data recorded over space and time, such as traffic flows or pollutant levels. Instead of beginning flow matching from unstructured Gaussian noise, it builds an initial distribution by passing the available observations through a spatiotemporal filter on an underlying graph. This produces a source distribution already closer to the complete data, shortening the path the model must learn. A single vector field that mixes spatial attention, temporal attention, and graph-based propagation then steers the flow while respecting both kinds of structure at once. Experiments on synthetic benchmarks and real monitoring datasets show lower imputation error than prior recurrent, graph, and diffusion baselines.

What carries the argument

The graph-informed prior obtained by spatiotemporal filtering of observable signals, which reduces the distance between source and target distributions inside the flow-matching framework.

What would settle it

On a new spatiotemporal dataset, measure the optimal transport distance or required number of integration steps from the graph-informed prior versus a Gaussian prior; if the graph-informed version shows no reduction in distance or steps and no drop in final imputation error, the claimed simplification does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

GiFlow replaces the typical Gaussian prior with a graph-informed prior constructed via spatiotemporal filtering of observable signals, which better aligns the source distribution to the target and thereby simplifies the generation trajectory. The flow field is parameterized by a hybrid vector field model that integrates spatial attention, temporal attention, and spatiotemporal propagation, enabling joint modeling of spatial and temporal dependencies.

Load-bearing premise

The prior obtained by filtering observable signals through a spatiotemporal graph lies closer to the target data distribution than a standard Gaussian prior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The hybrid attention-plus-propagation vector field captures space-time dependencies without the sequential error buildup of recurrent or iterative graph models.
  • Fewer integration steps are required during generation because the learned velocity field operates over a shorter trajectory.
  • The same filtering construction can be reused across different graph topologies without retraining the entire generative model from scratch.
  • Performance gains appear consistently on both controlled synthetic grids and irregular real-world sensor networks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The filtering step that creates the prior could be replaced by other structure-preserving operators when the data possess different regularities, such as temporal periodicity alone.
  • Because the method decouples prior construction from the flow field, the same prior could be paired with score-based or other continuous-time generative models.
  • In settings where only partial graphs are known, the filtering operation itself might be learned jointly with the vector field.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes GiFlow, a Graph-Informed Flow Matching framework for spatiotemporal imputation. It replaces standard Gaussian priors with a graph-informed prior obtained via spatiotemporal filtering of observable signals, with the goal of better aligning source and target distributions and simplifying the generation trajectory. The flow is parameterized by a hybrid vector field combining spatial attention, temporal attention, and spatiotemporal propagation. The central empirical claim is that GiFlow outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and real-world spatiotemporal imputation tasks, with code released at the provided GitHub link.

Significance. If the reported outperformance holds under rigorous evaluation, the work could advance imputation methods by demonstrating practical benefits of informed priors and hybrid attention-propagation fields over both iterative propagation networks and standard diffusion/flow models. The explicit release of code supports reproducibility and is a positive factor.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract asserts that the graph-informed prior 'better aligns the source distribution to the target' and 'simplifies the generation trajectory,' but provides no quantitative support (e.g., Wasserstein distance, trajectory length, or ablation) for this alignment benefit.
  2. No error bars, statistical significance tests, or dataset-specific metrics are mentioned in the abstract, which weakens the claim of consistent outperformance over SOTA.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their summary of our manuscript on GiFlow and for noting the positive aspects of code release and potential impact. The recommendation of 'uncertain' appears tied to whether outperformance holds under rigorous evaluation, but the report contains no explicit major comments or specific concerns to address point by point.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces GiFlow as a new graph-informed flow matching construction for imputation, replacing Gaussian priors with a spatiotemporal-filtered prior and using a hybrid attention/propagation vector field. The central claim is empirical (outperformance on synthetic and real datasets) rather than a derivation that reduces to fitted parameters or self-citations. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are shown to be self-referential or load-bearing on prior author work; the method is presented as an original framework with independent experimental validation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatiotemporal Imputation with Graph-Informed Flow Matching." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2FMMOOUA

@misc{pith2026260606682,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatiotemporal Imputation with Graph-Informed Flow Matching},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2FMMOOUA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.06682}
}
read the original abstract

Missing data is a common challenge in spatiotemporal systems, arising in applications such as air quality monitoring and urban traffic management. Traditional machine learning approaches, like recurrent and graph neural networks, rely on iterative propagation, which tends to accumulate errors over time and space. Recent diffusion-based methods mitigate error propagation but require iterative sampling and often depend on problem-agnostic Gaussian priors, limiting both efficiency and effectiveness. To address these limitations, we propose GiFlow, a Graph-Informed Flow Matching framework for spatiotemporal imputation. GiFlow replaces the typical Gaussian prior with a graph-informed prior constructed via spatiotemporal filtering of observable signals, which better aligns the source distribution to the target and thereby simplifies the generation trajectory. The flow field is parameterized by a hybrid vector field model that integrates spatial attention, temporal attention, and spatiotemporal propagation, enabling joint modeling of spatial and temporal dependencies. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed GiFlow outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches in spatiotemporal imputation. The code is available at https://github.com/zepengzhang/GiFlow.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06682 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic comparison of GiFlow and FM-Gauss (a FM model with a Gaussian prior). The red and blue dashed lines represent the information used to generate the prior for GiFlow and FM-Gauss, respectively. GiFlow constructs a graph-informed prior via adaptive spatiotemporal filtering of the observable signals, aligning the source distribution closer to the target, and hence simplifying the generation trajectories (lower… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Performance with different missing rates. ments using the point missing strategy (ρ = 20%) with both σ = 0.1 and σ = 0.3 to evaluate the performance under dif￾ferent noisy levels. The results are given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Filtering factors with different missing rate. observable ones. In the following, we investigate how τη and τξ change as the missing rate ρ increases. The values of the filtering factors τη and τξ under both the point missing strategy and block missing strategy on the Air-36 dataset with ρ ranging from 20% to 60% are presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Performance on RMSE with different Missing Rate. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Filtering factor values with different missing rates on the AQI dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Albergo, M. S. and Vanden-Eijnden, E. Building normalizing flows with stochastic interpolants. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    S., Goldstein, M., Boffi, N

    Albergo, M. S., Goldstein, M., Boffi, N. M., Ranganath, R., and Vanden-Eijnden, E. Stochastic interpolants with data-dependent couplings. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Ansley, C. F. and Kohn, R. On the estimation of arima models with missing values. In Time Series Analysis of Irregularly Observed Data, pp.\ 9--37. Springer, 1984

    1984

  4. [4]

    Spatio-temporal data mining: A survey of problems and methods

    Atluri, G., Karpatne, A., and Kumar, V. Spatio-temporal data mining: A survey of problems and methods. ACM Computing Surveys, 51 0 (4): 0 1--41, 2018

    2018

  5. [5]

    TIDE : Time derivative diffusion for deep learning on graphs

    Behmanesh, M., Krahn, M., and Ovsjanikov, M. TIDE : Time derivative diffusion for deep learning on graphs. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    and Santaniello, A

    Beretta, L. and Santaniello, A. Nearest neighbor imputation algorithms: A critical evaluation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16 0 (Suppl 3): 0 74, 2016

    2016

  7. [7]

    B., Gripon, V., Tang, J., and Ortega, A

    Bontonou, M., Lassance, C., Hacene, G. B., Gripon, V., Tang, J., and Ortega, A. Introducing graph smoothness loss for training deep learning architectures. In IEEE Data Science Workshop, 2019

    2019

  8. [8]

    Cao, H., Tan, C., Gao, Z., Xu, Y., Chen, G., Heng, P.-A., and Li, S. Z. A survey on generative diffusion models. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 36 0 (7): 0 2814--2830, 2024

    2024

Show all 118 references
  1. [9]

    BRITS : Bidirectional recurrent imputation for time series

    Cao, W., Wang, D., Li, J., Zhou, H., Li, L., and Li, Y. BRITS : Bidirectional recurrent imputation for time series. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    Freeway performance measurement system: Mining loop detector data

    Chen, C., Petty, K., Skabardonis, A., Varaiya, P., and Jia, Z. Freeway performance measurement system: Mining loop detector data. Transportation Research Record, 1748 0 (1): 0 96--102, 2001

    2001

  3. [11]

    Filling the g\_ap\_s: Multivariate time series imputation by graph neural networks

    Cini, A., Marisca, I., and Alippi, C. Filling the g\_ap\_s: Multivariate time series imputation by graph neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Graph deep learning for time series forecasting

    Cini, A., Marisca, I., Zambon, D., and Alippi, C. Graph deep learning for time series forecasting. ACM Computing Surveys, 57 0 (12): 0 1--34, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    T., and Shah, M

    Croitoru, F.-A., Hondru, V., Ionescu, R. T., and Shah, M. Diffusion models in vision: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45 0 (9): 0 10850--10869, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Learning from highly sparse spatio-temporal data

    Deng, L., Wu, C., Lian, D., and Chen, E. Learning from highly sparse spatio-temporal data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    and Nichol, A

    Dhariwal, P. and Nichol, A. Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Graph signal processing for machine learning: A review and new perspectives

    Dong, X., Thanou, D., Toni, L., Bronstein, M., and Frossard, P. Graph signal processing for machine learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37 0 (6): 0 117--127, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    SAITS : Self-attention-based imputation for time series

    Du, W., C \^o t \'e , D., and Liu, Y. SAITS : Self-attention-based imputation for time series. Expert Systems with Applications, 219: 0 119619, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Einizade, A., Malliaros, F., and Giraldo, J. H. Continuous product graph neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    H., Mahmood, A., Garcia-Garcia, B., Thanou, D., and Bouwmans, T

    Giraldo, J. H., Mahmood, A., Garcia-Garcia, B., Thanou, D., and Bouwmans, T. Reconstruction of time-varying graph signals via Sobolev smoothness. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 8: 0 201--214, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Learning dynamics and heterogeneity of spatial-temporal graph data for traffic forecasting

    Guo, S., Lin, Y., Wan, H., Li, X., and Cong, G. Learning dynamics and heterogeneity of spatial-temporal graph data for traffic forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34 0 (11): 0 5415--5428, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Filling the missings: Spatiotemporal data imputation by conditional diffusion

    He, W., Huang, J., Gu, J., Zhang, J., and Bai, Y. Filling the missings: Spatiotemporal data imputation by conditional diffusion. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Ho, J., Jain, A., and Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    and Ba, J

    Kingma, D. and Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    u dke, D., Schwinn, L., and G \

    Kollovieh, M., Lienen, M., L \"u dke, D., Schwinn, L., and G \"u nnemann, S. Flow matching with gaussian process priors for probabilistic time series forecasting. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting

    Li, Y., Yu, R., Shahabi, C., and Liu, Y. Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Lipman, Y., Chen, R. T. Q., Ben-Hamu, H., Nickel, M., and Le, M. Flow matching for generative modeling. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    PriSTI : A conditional diffusion framework for spatiotemporal imputation

    Liu, M., Huang, H., Feng, H., Sun, L., Du, B., and Fu, Y. PriSTI : A conditional diffusion framework for spatiotemporal imputation. In IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, 2023 a

    2023

  20. [28]

    Flowing from words to pixels: A noise-free framework for cross-modality evolution

    Liu, Q., Yin, X., Yuille, A., Brown, A., and Singh, M. Flowing from words to pixels: A noise-free framework for cross-modality evolution. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025 a

    2025

  21. [29]

    Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow

    Liu, X., Gong, C., and Liu, Q. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023 b

    2023

  22. [30]

    Naomi: Non-autoregressive multiresolution sequence imputation

    Liu, Y., Yu, R., Zheng, S., Zhan, E., and Yue, Y. Naomi: Non-autoregressive multiresolution sequence imputation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    See further when clear: Curriculum consistency model

    Liu, Y., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Hou, X., Song, G., Liu, Y., and You, H. See further when clear: Curriculum consistency model. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025 b

    2025

  24. [32]

    A spatiotemporal industrial soft sensor modeling scheme for quality prediction with missing data

    Ma, L., Wang, M., and Peng, K. A spatiotemporal industrial soft sensor modeling scheme for quality prediction with missing data. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 73: 0 1--10, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Learning to reconstruct missing data from spatiotemporal graphs with sparse observations

    Marisca, I., Cini, A., and Alippi, C. Learning to reconstruct missing data from spatiotemporal graphs with sparse observations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Graph-based forecasting with missing data through spatiotemporal downsampling

    Marisca, I., Alippi, C., et al. Graph-based forecasting with missing data through spatiotemporal downsampling. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    L., Lenssen, J

    Morris, C., Ritzert, M., Fey, M., Hamilton, W. L., Lenssen, J. E., Rattan, G., and Grohe, M. Weisfeiler and Leman go neural: Higher-order graph neural networks. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    V., Mohamed, S., and Marwala, T

    Nelwamondo, F. V., Mohamed, S., and Marwala, T. Missing data: A comparison of neural network and expectation maximization techniques. Current Science, pp.\ 1514--1521, 2007

    2007

  29. [37]

    Spatio-temporal graph scattering transform

    Pan, C., Chen, S., and Ortega, A. Spatio-temporal graph scattering transform. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    R., El-Kadi, A., Masters, D., Ewalds, T., Stott, J., Mohamed, S., Battaglia, P., et al

    Price, I., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Alet, F., Andersson, T. R., El-Kadi, A., Masters, D., Ewalds, T., Stott, J., Mohamed, S., Battaglia, P., et al. Probabilistic weather forecasting with machine learning. Nature, 637 0 (8044): 0 84--90, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    Time-varying graph signal reconstruction

    Qiu, K., Mao, X., Shen, X., Wang, X., Li, T., and Gu, Y. Time-varying graph signal reconstruction. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 11 0 (6): 0 870--883, 2017

    2017

  32. [40]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., and Ommer, B. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    I., Chamberlain, B

    Rossi, E., Kenlay, H., Gorinova, M. I., Chamberlain, B. P., Dong, X., and Bronstein, M. M. On the unreasonable effectiveness of feature propagation in learning on graphs with missing node features. In Learning on Graphs Conference, 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics

    Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E., Maheswaranathan, N., and Ganguli, S. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    A., and Nepomuceno-Chamorro, I

    Sol \' s-Garc \' a, J., Vega-M \'a rquez, B., Nepomuceno, J. A., and Nepomuceno-Chamorro, I. A. CoSTI : Consistency models for (a faster) spatio-temporal imputation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 327: 0 114117, 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., and Poole, B

    Song, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., and Poole, B. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Consistency models

    Song, Y., Dhariwal, P., Chen, M., and Sutskever, I. Consistency models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    S., Chi, E

    Stanley, J. S., Chi, E. C., and Mishne, G. Multiway graph signal processing on tensors: Integrative analysis of irregular geometries. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37 0 (6): 0 160--173, 2020

    2020

  39. [47]

    CSDI : Conditional score-based diffusion models for probabilistic time series imputation

    Tashiro, Y., Song, J., Song, Y., and Ermon, S. CSDI : Conditional score-based diffusion models for probabilistic time series imputation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport

    Tong, A., Fatras, K., Malkin, N., Huguet, G., Zhang, Y., Rector-Brooks, J., Wolf, G., and Bengio, Y. Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, pp.\ 1--34, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    N., Kaiser, ., and Polosukhin, I

    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, ., and Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    Wang, S., Cao, J., and Philip, S. Y. Deep learning for spatio-temporal data mining: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34 0 (8): 0 3681--3700, 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    Transformers in time series: A survey

    Wen, Q., Zhou, T., Zhang, C., Chen, W., Ma, Z., Yan, J., and Sun, L. Transformers in time series: A survey. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    Simplifying graph convolutional networks

    Wu, F., Souza, A., Zhang, T., Fifty, C., Yu, T., and Weinberger, K. Simplifying graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications

    Yang, L., Zhang, Z., Song, Y., Hong, S., Xu, R., Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Cui, B., and Yang, M.-H. Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications. ACM Computing Surveys, 56 0 (4): 0 1--39, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    ST-MVL : Filling missing values in geo-sensory time series data

    Yi, X., Zheng, Y., Zhang, J., and Li, T. ST-MVL : Filling missing values in geo-sensory time series data. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016

    2016

  47. [55]

    Forecasting fine-grained air quality based on big data

    Zheng, Y., Yi, X., Li, M., Li, R., Shan, Z., Chang, E., and Li, T. Forecasting fine-grained air quality based on big data. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2015

    2015

  48. [56]

    Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting

    Zhou, H., Zhang, S., Peng, J., Zhang, S., Li, J., Xiong, H., and Zhang, W. Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021

    2021

  49. [57]

    and Chi, Eric C

    Stanley, Jay S. and Chi, Eric C. and Mishne, Gal , journal=. Multiway Graph Signal Processing on Tensors: Integrative Analysis of Irregular Geometries , year=

  50. [58]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Consistency Models , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

  51. [59]

    ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , year=

    Forecasting fine-grained air quality based on big data , author=. ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , year=

  52. [60]

    ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , year=

    ImputeFormer: Low rankness-induced transformers for generalizable spatiotemporal imputation , author=. ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , year=

  53. [61]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Naomi: Non-autoregressive multiresolution sequence imputation , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  54. [62]

    Transportation Research Record , volume=

    Freeway performance measurement system: Mining loop detector data , author=. Transportation Research Record , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  55. [63]

    IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year=

    See Further When Clear: Curriculum Consistency Model , author=. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year=

  56. [64]

    Knowledge-Based Systems , volume=

    Sol. Knowledge-Based Systems , volume=

  57. [65]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Continuous product graph neural networks , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  58. [66]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Learning from highly sparse spatio-temporal data , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  59. [67]

    IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , volume=

    Graph signal processing for machine learning: A review and new perspectives , author=. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  60. [68]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , volume=

    A spatiotemporal industrial soft sensor modeling scheme for quality prediction with missing data , author=. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  61. [69]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Graph-based Forecasting with Missing Data through Spatiotemporal Downsampling , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

  62. [70]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=

    Learning dynamics and heterogeneity of spatial-temporal graph data for traffic forecasting , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  63. [71]

    IEEE Data Science Workshop , year=

    Introducing graph smoothness loss for training deep learning architectures , author=. IEEE Data Science Workshop , year=

  64. [72]

    Learning on Graphs Conference , year=

    On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Feature Propagation in Learning on Graphs with Missing Node Features , author=. Learning on Graphs Conference , year=

  65. [73]

    Tashiro, Yusuke and Song, Jiaming and Song, Yang and Ermon, Stefano , booktitle=

  66. [74]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Learning to reconstruct missing data from spatiotemporal graphs with sparse observations , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  67. [75]

    Expert Systems with Applications , volume=

    Du, Wenjie and C. Expert Systems with Applications , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  68. [76]

    Transactions on Machine Learning Research , pages=

    Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport , author=. Transactions on Machine Learning Research , pages=

  69. [77]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Simplifying graph convolutional networks , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

  70. [78]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06264 , year=

    Flow matching guide and code , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06264 , year=

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Spatio-Temporal Graph Scattering Transform , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  72. [80]

    AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

    Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

  73. [81]

    International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

    Transformers in time series: A survey , author=. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

  74. [82]

    Behmanesh, Maysam and Krahn, Maximilian and Ovsjanikov, Maks , booktitle=

  75. [83]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Attention is all you need , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  76. [84]

    Morris, Christopher and Ritzert, Martin and Fey, Matthias and Hamilton, William L and Lenssen, Jan Eric and Rattan, Gaurav and Grohe, Martin , booktitle=

  77. [85]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=

    A survey on generative diffusion models , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  78. [86]

    ACM Computing Surveys , volume=

    Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications , author=. ACM Computing Surveys , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  79. [87]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=

    Diffusion models in vision: A survey , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  80. [88]

    Nature , volume=

    Probabilistic weather forecasting with machine learning , author=. Nature , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  81. [89]

    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making , volume=

    Nearest neighbor imputation algorithms: A critical evaluation , author=. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  82. [90]

    Current Science , pages=

    Missing data: A comparison of neural network and expectation maximization techniques , author=. Current Science , pages=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  83. [91]

    Time Series Analysis of Irregularly Observed Data , pages=

    On the estimation of ARIMA models with missing values , author=. Time Series Analysis of Irregularly Observed Data , pages=. 1984 , organization=

    1984

  84. [92]

    IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year=

    Flowing from Words to Pixels: A Noise-Free Framework for Cross-Modality Evolution , author=. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year=

  85. [93]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , volume=

    Time-varying graph signal reconstruction , author=. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  86. [94]

    Reconstruction of time-varying graph signals via

    Giraldo, Jhony H and Mahmood, Arif and Garcia-Garcia, Belmar and Thanou, Dorina and Bouwmans, Thierry , journal=. Reconstruction of time-varying graph signals via. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  87. [95]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  88. [96]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Flow Matching for Generative Modeling , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  89. [97]

    ACM Computing Surveys , volume=

    Spatio-temporal data mining: A survey of problems and methods , author=. ACM Computing Surveys , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  90. [98]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=

    Deep learning for spatio-temporal data mining: A survey , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  91. [99]

    ACM Computing Surveys , volume=

    Graph deep learning for time series forecasting , author=. ACM Computing Surveys , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  92. [100]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Diffusion Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network: Data-Driven Traffic Forecasting , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  93. [101]

    Liu, Mingzhe and Huang, Han and Feng, Hao and Sun, Leilei and Du, Bowen and Fu, Yanjie , booktitle=

  94. [102]

    International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

    Filling the missings: Spatiotemporal data imputation by conditional diffusion , author=. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

  95. [103]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Filling the G\_ap\_s: Multivariate Time Series Imputation by Graph Neural Networks , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  96. [104]

    Cao, Wei and Wang, Dong and Li, Jian and Zhou, Hao and Li, Lei and Li, Yitan , booktitle=

  97. [105]

    Yi, Xiuwen and Zheng, Yu and Zhang, Junbo and Li, Tianrui , booktitle=

  98. [106]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  99. [107]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  100. [108]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , year =

    Kingma, Diederik and Ba, Jimmy , booktitle =. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , year =

  101. [109]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Stochastic Interpolants with Data-Dependent Couplings , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

  102. [110]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

  103. [111]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

    Autoregressive diffusion model for graph generation , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

  104. [112]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    DiGress: Discrete Denoising diffusion for graph generation , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  105. [113]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Video diffusion models , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  106. [114]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Make-A-Video: Text-to-Video Generation without Text-Video Data , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  107. [115]

    Diffusion models beat

    Dhariwal, Prafulla and Nichol, Alexander , booktitle=. Diffusion models beat

  108. [116]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  109. [117]

    IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year=

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models , author=. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , year=

  110. [118]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.