pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06829 · v1 · pith:3747SGL6new · submitted 2026-06-05 · 💻 cs.RO

Three-dimensional hydro-cluttered locomotion by an undulatory robot

Tianyu Wang , Matthew Fernandez , Galen Tunnicliffe , Nikolas Cornell , Justin Duong , Donoven Dortilus , Zhaochen J. Xu , Patricia Meza
show 5 more authors
Sean Lublinsky Darsh Parikh Jianfeng Lin Emily Grace Daniel I. Goldman
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 22:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords hydro-cluttered locomotionundulatory robotbody complianceaquatic roboticsdepth regulationemergent rollinglimbless robotmangrove navigation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Programmable body compliance enables an undulatory aquatic robot to convert clutter contacts into robust forward locomotion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes principles for locomotion in hydro-cluttered aquatic spaces where contacts with obstacles are unavoidable. It shows through experiments that tuning body compliance allows the robot to regulate deformation and turn interactions into propulsion. Depth regulation adds a third dimension for bypassing blocks. Emergent rolling provides recovery from jams. These features were tested successfully in a mangrove field setting.

Core claim

Systematic robophysical experiments reveal that programmable body compliance regulates body deformation and converts body-environment interactions into fast, robust, forward progression across increasing hydro-clutter constraint strength. Depth regulation provides three-dimensional access, allowing the robot to bypass clutter, recover from obstruction, and continue through otherwise inaccessible routes. In potential jamming scenarios, emergent inertia-induced rolling acts as a spontaneous recovery mechanism.

What carries the argument

Programmable body compliance that regulates deformation to convert body-environment interactions into forward progression, supported by distributed depth regulation.

If this is right

  • Robots can achieve faster and more robust forward progression by adjusting compliance as clutter constraint strength increases.
  • Three-dimensional access via depth regulation enables bypassing clutter and reaching routes that would otherwise be inaccessible.
  • Inertia-induced rolling provides spontaneous recovery from potential jamming without requiring additional control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar compliance tuning might reduce the need for complex sensing in other robot designs operating amid obstacles.
  • The approach could support longer untethered operations by treating contacts as resources rather than failures.
  • These behaviors may suggest design rules for robots in other media where contacts are frequent, such as dense vegetation.

Load-bearing premise

The observed effects of compliance regulation and emergent recovery will generalize beyond the specific experimental setups and mangrove test to arbitrary hydro-cluttered conditions.

What would settle it

A demonstration in a new hydro-clutter setup with different obstacle densities or flexibilities where the robot fails to progress or recover despite the described compliance and depth settings.

read the original abstract

Aquatic robots have expanded human access to underwater environments, yet many underwater spaces contain obstacles that can disrupt open-water locomotion. In "hydro-cluttered" environments, water is interspersed with rigid and flexible clutter, making body-obstacle contact unavoidable. Operating in these spaces requires robots that can regulate and exploit contact, but this regime remains difficult to model or simulate. Building on recent advances in mechanical intelligence in terradynamically capable limbless robotics, we develop principles for 3D aquatic locomotion using AquaMILR, an elongate limbless robot that combines bilateral cable-driven actuation, programmable body compliance, distributed depth regulation, corrosion-resistant enclosures, and onboard power and electronics for untethered field operation. Systematic robophysical experiments reveal that programmable body compliance regulates body deformation and converts body-environment interactions into fast, robust, forward progression across increasing hydro-clutter constraint strength. Depth regulation provides three-dimensional access, allowing the robot to bypass clutter, recover from obstruction, and continue through otherwise inaccessible routes. In potential jamming scenarios, emergent inertia-induced rolling acts as a spontaneous recovery mechanism, freeing the robot from clutter that would otherwise lead to failure and allowing locomotion to continue without additional control. Tests of the robot in an aquatic mangrove field demonstrate that these principles transfer to practical operation, enabling navigation and onboard visual inspection of inaccessible root zones. These results establish principles for hydro-cluttered locomotion and a design paradigm in which aquatic robots exploit environmental complexity as a locomotor resource.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents AquaMILR, an untethered elongate limbless robot combining bilateral cable-driven actuation, programmable body compliance, distributed depth regulation, and corrosion-resistant enclosures. It claims that systematic robophysical experiments demonstrate programmable compliance regulating body deformation to convert interactions into fast, robust forward progression across increasing hydro-clutter constraint strength; depth regulation enabling 3D bypass and recovery; and emergent inertia-induced rolling providing spontaneous recovery from jamming. These principles are shown to transfer in a mangrove field demonstration for navigation and visual inspection.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold, the work advances mechanical intelligence approaches from terrestrial to aquatic domains by treating hydro-clutter as a locomotor resource rather than an obstacle. The untethered field operation and identification of emergent recovery mechanisms are concrete strengths for practical underwater robotics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that compliance 'converts body-environment interactions into fast, robust, forward progression across increasing hydro-clutter constraint strength' is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the abstract provides no quantitative metrics, success rates, or definition of constraint strength; without these, the systematic experiments cannot be evaluated for effect size or robustness.
  2. [Field demonstration] Field demonstration paragraph: the assertion that 'these principles transfer to practical operation' rests on a single mangrove test; this does not address variations in clutter density, flexibility distributions, or flow regimes, leaving the generalization assumption (the weakest link per the stress-test) unsupported by additional sweeps or conditions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the robot name AquaMILR is used without expansion on first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on the manuscript. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that compliance 'converts body-environment interactions into fast, robust, forward progression across increasing hydro-clutter constraint strength' is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the abstract provides no quantitative metrics, success rates, or definition of constraint strength; without these, the systematic experiments cannot be evaluated for effect size or robustness.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit quantitative support to allow readers to assess effect size and robustness directly. We have revised the abstract to incorporate brief references to the quantitative metrics (forward speeds and success rates) and success rates reported from the systematic experiments, as well as a concise definition of constraint strength in terms of obstacle density and flexibility. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Field demonstration] Field demonstration paragraph: the assertion that 'these principles transfer to practical operation' rests on a single mangrove test; this does not address variations in clutter density, flexibility distributions, or flow regimes, leaving the generalization assumption (the weakest link per the stress-test) unsupported by additional sweeps or conditions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the field demonstration consists of a single test and does not include systematic sweeps over clutter density, flexibility, or flow. This test is presented as an initial illustration of transfer to a real environment rather than comprehensive validation. The primary evidence for the locomotor principles derives from the controlled robophysical experiments. We have revised the relevant paragraph to qualify the transfer claim and to note the single-test limitation explicitly, while highlighting the need for future work on environmental variations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain present; claims rest on experiments

full rationale

The paper contains no equations, parameter fits, or mathematical derivations. All central claims (compliance regulation converting interactions to progression, depth regulation enabling 3D access, inertia-induced rolling as recovery) are presented as outcomes of systematic robophysical experiments and a single mangrove field test. No self-citation is used to justify uniqueness or to close a derivation loop. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks via direct observation, with no reduction of predictions to fitted inputs or imported ansatzes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text. The work is empirical and design-oriented rather than axiomatic.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5837 in / 1180 out tokens · 25655 ms · 2026-06-27T22:11:43.568234+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Zereik, M

    E. Zereik, M. Bibuli, N. Miˇskovi´c, P. Ridao, A. Pascoal, Challenges and future trends in marine robotics.Annual Reviews in Control46, 350–368 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Fu,et al., Design, perception, planning and control for underwater cleaning robotics: Progress, challenges and trends.Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science11(2), 614–637 (2026)

    T. Fu,et al., Design, perception, planning and control for underwater cleaning robotics: Progress, challenges and trends.Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science11(2), 614–637 (2026)

    2026

  3. [3]

    Nauert, P

    F. Nauert, P. Kampmann, Inspection and maintenance of industrial infrastructure with au- tonomous underwater robots.Frontiers in Robotics and AIVolume 10 - 2023(2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Barrett, M

    D. Barrett, M. Triantafyllou, D. Yue, M. Grosenbaugh, M. Wolfgang, Drag reduction in fish-like locomotion.Journal of fluid mechanics392, 183–212 (1999)

    1999

  5. [5]

    A. D. Marchese, C. D. Onal, D. Rus, Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators.Soft robotics1(1), 75–87 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    R. K. Katzschmann, J. DelPreto, R. MacCurdy, D. Rus, Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish.Science Robotics3(16), eaar3449 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Zhu,et al., Tuna robotics: A high-frequency experimental platform exploring the performance space of swimming fishes.Science Robotics4(34), eaax4615 (2019)

    J. Zhu,et al., Tuna robotics: A high-frequency experimental platform exploring the performance space of swimming fishes.Science Robotics4(34), eaax4615 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Zhong,et al., Tunable stiffness enables fast and efficient swimming in fish-like robots

    Q. Zhong,et al., Tunable stiffness enables fast and efficient swimming in fish-like robots. Science Robotics6(57), eabe4088 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    C. H. White, G. V. Lauder, H. Bart-Smith, Tunabot Flex: a tuna-inspired robot with body flexibility improves high-performance swimming.Bioinspiration & Biomimetics16(2), 026019 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Aragaki, T

    D. Aragaki, T. Nishimura, R. Sato, A. Ming, Biomimetic Soft Underwater Robot Inspired by the Red Muscle and Tendon Structure of Fish.Biomimetics8(2) (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    R. Du, Z. Li, K. Youcef-Toumi, P. Alvarado,Robot Fish: Bio-inspired Fishlike Underwater Robots, Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering (Springer Berlin Heidelberg) (2015). 26

    2015

  12. [12]

    McCammon,et al., Autonomous seeking and mapping coral reef biodiversity hotspots with a multimodal AUV.Science Robotics11(114), eadx9939 (2026)

    S. McCammon,et al., Autonomous seeking and mapping coral reef biodiversity hotspots with a multimodal AUV.Science Robotics11(114), eadx9939 (2026)

    2026

  13. [13]

    D. R. Yoerger,et al., A hybrid underwater robot for multidisciplinary investigation of the ocean twilight zone.Science Robotics6(55), eabe1901 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Patel, A Comprehensive Review of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles: Technologies, Appli- cations, and Challenges.J

    S. Patel, A Comprehensive Review of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles: Technologies, Appli- cations, and Challenges.J. Sci. Innov. Adv. Res1, 236–243 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Fun Sang Cepeda,et al., Exploring Autonomous and Remotely Operated Vehicles in Offshore Structure Inspections.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering11(11) (2023)

    M. Fun Sang Cepeda,et al., Exploring Autonomous and Remotely Operated Vehicles in Offshore Structure Inspections.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering11(11) (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Zhang,et al., Research progresses on equipment technologies used in safety inspection, repair, and reinforcement for deepwater dams.Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering(2021)

    S. Zhang,et al., Research progresses on equipment technologies used in safety inspection, repair, and reinforcement for deepwater dams.Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering(2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Teague, M

    J. Teague, M. J. Allen, T. B. Scott, The potential of low-cost ROV for use in deep-sea mineral, ore prospecting and monitoring.Ocean Engineering147, 333–339 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    Lawson,et al., Use of an unmanned aerial-aquatic vehicle for acoustic sensing in freshwater ecosystems.Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation(2023)

    J. Lawson,et al., Use of an unmanned aerial-aquatic vehicle for acoustic sensing in freshwater ecosystems.Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation(2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Li,et al., Self-powered soft robot in the Mariana Trench.Nature591(7848), 66–71 (2021)

    G. Li,et al., Self-powered soft robot in the Mariana Trench.Nature591(7848), 66–71 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Pan,et al., Miniature deep-sea morphable robot with multimodal locomotion.Science Robotics10(100), eadp7821 (2025)

    F. Pan,et al., Miniature deep-sea morphable robot with multimodal locomotion.Science Robotics10(100), eadp7821 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Li,et al., Plasticized electrohydraulic robot autopilots in the deep sea.Science Robotics 10(105), eadt8054 (2025)

    G. Li,et al., Plasticized electrohydraulic robot autopilots in the deep sea.Science Robotics 10(105), eadt8054 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    J. Wang, P. Du, Y. Zhang, Z. Xie, C. Laschi, From shallow waters to Mariana Trench: a survey of bio-inspired underwater soft robots.Bioinspiration & Biomimetics21(2), 021002 (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    Liang,et al., Role of deep-sea equipment in promoting the forefront of studies on life in extreme environments.Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography(2022)

    J. Liang,et al., Role of deep-sea equipment in promoting the forefront of studies on life in extreme environments.Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography(2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Li,et al., Bioinspired soft robots for deep-sea exploration.Nature Communications14, 7097 (2023)

    G. Li,et al., Bioinspired soft robots for deep-sea exploration.Nature Communications14, 7097 (2023). 27

    2023

  25. [25]

    Baines,et al., Multi-environment robotic transitions through adaptive morphogenesis.Na- ture610, 283–289 (2022)

    R. Baines,et al., Multi-environment robotic transitions through adaptive morphogenesis.Na- ture610, 283–289 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Xia,et al., Toward a Track-Fin Hybrid Driven Bionic Amphibious Robot: Design, Devel- opment, and Experiments.Journal of Field Robotics42(4), 1143–1165 (2025)

    M. Xia,et al., Toward a Track-Fin Hybrid Driven Bionic Amphibious Robot: Design, Devel- opment, and Experiments.Journal of Field Robotics42(4), 1143–1165 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Crespi, A

    A. Crespi, A. J. Ijspeert, Online optimization of swimming and crawling in an amphibious snake robot.IEEE Transactions on robotics24(1), 75–87 (2008)

    2008

  28. [28]

    Spino, D

    P. Spino, D. Rus, Towards Centimeter-Scale Underwater Mobile Robots: An Architecture for Capable𝜇AUVs, in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE) (2024), pp. 1484–1490

    2024

  29. [29]

    Zufferey, R

    R. Zufferey, R. Siddall, S. F. Armanini, M. Kovac,Between sea and sky: aerial aquatic locomotion in miniature robots(Springer) (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    Debruyn,et al., Medusa: A multi-environment dual-robot for underwater sample acquisition

    D. Debruyn,et al., Medusa: A multi-environment dual-robot for underwater sample acquisition. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(3), 4564–4571 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    Chen,et al., A biologically inspired, flapping-wing, hybrid aerial-aquatic microrobot.Sci- ence robotics2(11), eaao5619 (2017)

    Y. Chen,et al., A biologically inspired, flapping-wing, hybrid aerial-aquatic microrobot.Sci- ence robotics2(11), eaao5619 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    Qu,et al., Recent Advances on Underwater Soft Robots.Advanced Intelligent Systems6(2), 2300299 (2024)

    J. Qu,et al., Recent Advances on Underwater Soft Robots.Advanced Intelligent Systems6(2), 2300299 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Li,et al., Bioinspired underwater soft robots: from biology to robotics and back.npj Robotics 4, 25 (2026)

    L. Li,et al., Bioinspired underwater soft robots: from biology to robotics and back.npj Robotics 4, 25 (2026)

    2026

  34. [34]

    Zhang,et al., Recent progress on underwater soft robots: adhesion, grabbing, actuating, and sensing.Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyVolume 11 - 2023(2023)

    Y. Zhang,et al., Recent progress on underwater soft robots: adhesion, grabbing, actuating, and sensing.Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyVolume 11 - 2023(2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Wang,et al., A versatile jellyfish-like robotic platform for effective underwater propulsion and manipulation.Science Advances9(15), eadg0292 (2023)

    T. Wang,et al., A versatile jellyfish-like robotic platform for effective underwater propulsion and manipulation.Science Advances9(15), eadg0292 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Lu,et al., Variable-Stiffness Underwater Robotic Systems: A Review.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering13(9) (2025)

    P. Lu,et al., Variable-Stiffness Underwater Robotic Systems: A Review.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering13(9) (2025). 28

    2025

  37. [37]

    Khatib,et al., Ocean one: A robotic avatar for oceanic discovery.IEEE Robotics & Automa- tion Magazine23(4), 20–29 (2016)

    O. Khatib,et al., Ocean one: A robotic avatar for oceanic discovery.IEEE Robotics & Automa- tion Magazine23(4), 20–29 (2016)

    2016

  38. [38]

    Stuart, S

    H. Stuart, S. Wang, O. Khatib, M. R. Cutkosky, The ocean one hands: An adaptive design for robust marine manipulation.The International Journal of Robotics Research36(2), 150–166 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    Watson, D

    S. Watson, D. A. Duecker, K. Groves, Localisation of unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) in complex and confined environments: A review.Sensors20(21), 6203 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    A. Raj, A. Thakur, Fish-inspired robots: design, sensing, actuation, and autonomy—a review of research.Bioinspiration & biomimetics11(3), 031001 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Qiao,et al., AUVs for Seabed Surveying: A Comprehensive Review of Side-Scan Sonar- Based Target Detection.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering14(2), 145 (2026)

    J. Qiao,et al., AUVs for Seabed Surveying: A Comprehensive Review of Side-Scan Sonar- Based Target Detection.Journal of Marine Science and Engineering14(2), 145 (2026)

    2026

  42. [42]

    Fan,et al., A robotic intelligent towing tank for learning complex fluid-structure dynamics

    D. Fan,et al., A robotic intelligent towing tank for learning complex fluid-structure dynamics. Science Robotics4(36), eaay5063 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    K. Ren, J. Yu, Research status of bionic amphibious robots: A review.Ocean Engineering227, 108862 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    C. Wong, E. Yang, X.-T. Yan, D. Gu, Autonomous robots for harsh environments: a holistic overview of current solutions and ongoing challenges.Systems Science & Control Engineering 6(1), 213–219 (2018)

    2018

  45. [45]

    Mazzini, S

    F. Mazzini, S. Dubowsky, An experimental validation of robotic tactile mapping in harsh environments such as deep sea oil well sites, inExperimental Robotics: The 12th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics(Springer) (2014), pp. 557–570

    2014

  46. [46]

    Besson,et al., Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities.Ecology letters25(12), 2753–2775 (2022)

    M. Besson,et al., Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities.Ecology letters25(12), 2753–2775 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    C. Li, T. Zhang, D. I. Goldman, A terradynamics of legged locomotion on granular media. science339(6126), 1408–1412 (2013). 29

    2013

  48. [48]

    J. M. Rieser,et al., Geometric phase predicts locomotion performance in undulating living systems across scales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121(24), e2320517121 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    D. L. Hu, J. Nirody, T. Scott, M. J. Shelley, The mechanics of slithering locomotion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(25), 10081–10085 (2009)

    2009

  50. [50]

    M. Luo, Z. Wu, C. Yang, Strongly coupled fluid–structure interaction analysis of aquatic flapping wings based on flexible multibody dynamics and the modified unsteady vortex lattice method.Ocean Engineering281, 114921 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Tian,et al., CFD based parameter tuning for motion control of robotic fish.Bioinspiration & Biomimetics15(2), 026008 (2020)

    R. Tian,et al., CFD based parameter tuning for motion control of robotic fish.Bioinspiration & Biomimetics15(2), 026008 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    E. H. Dowell, K. C. Hall, Modeling of fluid-structure interaction.Annual review of fluid mechanics33(1), 445–490 (2001)

    2001

  53. [53]

    G. Hou, J. Wang, A. Layton, Numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction—a review. Communications in Computational Physics12(2), 337–377 (2012)

    2012

  54. [54]

    C. Ager, A. Seitz, W. A. Wall, A consistent and versatile computational approach for general fluid-structure-contact interaction problems.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering122(19), 5279–5312 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    Bazilevs, K

    Y. Bazilevs, K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar,Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and applications(John Wiley & Sons) (2013)

    2013

  56. [56]

    G. Liu,et al., Computational analysis of vortex dynamics and performance enhancement due to body–fin and fin–fin interactions in fish-like locomotion.Journal of Fluid Mechanics829, 65–88 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    Guo,et al., Vortex dynamics and fin-fin interactions resulting in performance enhancement in fish-like propulsion.Phys

    J. Guo,et al., Vortex dynamics and fin-fin interactions resulting in performance enhancement in fish-like propulsion.Phys. Rev. Fluids8, 073101 (2023). 30

    2023

  58. [58]

    J. Aguilar,et al., A review on locomotion robophysics: the study of movement at the intersection of robotics, soft matter and dynamical systems.Reports on Progress in Physics79(11), 110001 (2016)

    2016

  59. [59]

    Y. O. Aydin, J. M. Rieser, C. M. Hubicki, W. Savoie, D. I. Goldman, Physics approaches to natural locomotion: Every robot is an experiment, inRobotic Systems and Autonomous Platforms(Elsevier), pp. 109–127 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    E. D. Tytell, Kinematics and hydrodynamics of linear acceleration in eels, Anguilla rostrata. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences271(1557), 2535–2540 (2004)

    2004

  61. [61]

    T. L. Williams,et al., Locomotion in lamprey and trout: the relative timing of activation and movement.Journal of Experimental Biology143(1), 559–557 (1989)

    1989

  62. [62]

    J. B. Graham, W. R. Lowell, I. Rubinoff, J. Motta, Surface and subsurface swimming of the sea snake Pelamis platurus.Journal of Experimental Biology127(1), 27–44 (1987)

    1987

  63. [63]

    J. Chen, W. Friesen, T. Iwasaki, Mechanisms underlying rhythmic locomotion: body–fluid interaction in undulatory swimming.Journal of Experimental Biology214(4), 561–574 (2011)

    2011

  64. [64]

    M. D. Stokes, Larval locomotion of the lancelet Branchiostoma floridae.Journal of experi- mental biology200(11), 1661–1680 (1997)

    1997

  65. [65]

    Korta, D

    J. Korta, D. A. Clark, C. V. Gabel, L. Mahadevan, A. D. Samuel, Mechanosensation and me- chanical load modulate the locomotory gait of swimming C. elegans.Journal of Experimental Biology210(13), 2383–2389 (2007)

    2007

  66. [66]

    G. V. Lauder, E. D. Tytell, Hydrodynamics of Undulatory Propulsion, inFish Biomechanics (Academic Press), vol. 23 ofFish Physiology, pp. 425–468 (2005)

    2005

  67. [67]

    G. B. GILLIS, Undulatory Locomotion in Elongate Aquatic Vertebrates: Anguilliform Swim- ming since Sir James Gray.American Zoologist36(6), 656–665 (1996)

    1996

  68. [68]

    C. J. Pierce,et al., Dispersion relations for active undulators in overdamped environments.Phys. Rev. E(2026), doi:10.1103/lszs-51bf,https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/lszs-51bf. 31

    work page doi:10.1103/lszs-51bf 2026

  69. [69]

    V. Stin, R. Godoy-Diana, X. Bonnet, A. Herrel, Form and function of anguilliform swimming. Biological Reviews99(6), 2190–2210 (2024)

    2024

  70. [70]

    Li,et al., Underwater undulating propulsion biomimetic robots: A review.Biomimetics 8(3), 318 (2023)

    G. Li,et al., Underwater undulating propulsion biomimetic robots: A review.Biomimetics 8(3), 318 (2023)

    2023

  71. [71]

    Kelasidi, P

    E. Kelasidi, P. Liljeback, K. Y. Pettersen, J. T. Gravdahl, Innovation in underwater robots: Biologically inspired swimming snake robots.IEEE robotics & automation magazine23(1), 44–62 (2016)

    2016

  72. [72]

    Parra Rubio,et al., Modular morphing lattices for large-scale underwater continuum robotic structures.Soft Robotics10(4), 724–736 (2023)

    A. Parra Rubio,et al., Modular morphing lattices for large-scale underwater continuum robotic structures.Soft Robotics10(4), 724–736 (2023)

    2023

  73. [73]

    B. Liu, F. L. Hammond, Nonbiomorphic Passively Adaptive Swimming Robot Enables Agile Propulsion in Cluttered Aquatic Environments.Soft Robotics10(5), 884–896 (2023)

    2023

  74. [74]

    Yamada,et al., Development of amphibious snake-like robot ACM-R5, ISR2005.Proceed- ings of ISRp

    H. Yamada,et al., Development of amphibious snake-like robot ACM-R5, ISR2005.Proceed- ings of ISRp. 133 (2005)

    2005

  75. [75]

    Thandiackal,et al., Emergence of robust self-organized undulatory swimming based on local hydrodynamic force sensing.Science Robotics6(57), eabf6354 (2021)

    R. Thandiackal,et al., Emergence of robust self-organized undulatory swimming based on local hydrodynamic force sensing.Science Robotics6(57), eabf6354 (2021)

    2021

  76. [76]

    Liu,et al., Energy efficiency and neural control of continuous versus intermittent swimming in a fishlike robot.Science Robotics11(110), eadw7868 (2026)

    X. Liu,et al., Energy efficiency and neural control of continuous versus intermittent swimming in a fishlike robot.Science Robotics11(110), eadw7868 (2026)

    2026

  77. [77]

    Liljeb ¨ack, Ø

    P. Liljeb ¨ack, Ø. Stavdahl, K. Y. Pettersen, J. T. Gravdahl, Mamba-A waterproof snake robot with tactile sensing, in2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IEEE) (2014), pp. 294–301

    2014

  78. [78]

    H. Deng,et al., Development of an autonomous modular swimming robot with disturbance rejection and path tracking, in2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)(IEEE) (2023), pp. 6645–6651

    2023

  79. [79]

    Vogel, Modes and scaling in aquatic locomotion.Integrative and Comparative Biology 48(6), 702–712 (2008)

    S. Vogel, Modes and scaling in aquatic locomotion.Integrative and Comparative Biology 48(6), 702–712 (2008). 32

    2008

  80. [80]

    E. D. Tytell, C.-Y. Hsu, T. L. Williams, A. H. Cohen, L. J. Fauci, Interactions between internal forces, body stiffness, and fluid environment in a neuromechanical model of lamprey swimming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 19832–19837 (2010)

    2010

Showing first 80 references.