Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 53 references

The paper extends the phaseless Rytov approximation from two to three dimensions to enable volumetric reconstructions from signal-strength data alone.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 20:44 UTC pith:BC4OKEAN

load-bearing objection A 3D extension of xPRA whose validation only confirms reduction to the 2D case, leaving actual volumetric accuracy untested. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.06933 v1 pith:BC4OKEAN submitted 2026-06-05 eess.IV

A 3D Formulation of the Extended Phaseless Rytov Approximation

Wanqin Ma , Zan Li , Amartansh Dubey , Alikhan Umirbayev , Yijun Chen , Junhui Rao , Ross Murch This is my paper
classification eess.IV
keywords 3D RF imagingphaseless Rytov approximationdevice-free localizationradio tomographic imagingvolumetric reconstructionreceived signal strengthISAC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The work formulates a three-dimensional version of the extended Phaseless Rytov Approximation (x3DPRA) for device-free RF imaging. It seeks to deliver location, shape, and material-attenuation estimates inside a volume while retaining the linear, phase-free formulation that lets the method run on ordinary wireless hardware. A reader would care if the extension works because it would let existing communication networks add depth sensing without new bandwidth or phase hardware. The authors validate the formulation by comparing it to the two-dimensional case and by running simulations that recover object properties in 3D.

Core claim

The central claim is that x3DPRA supplies usable estimates of object location and shape together with material attenuation values inside a three-dimensional region, while keeping the same straightforward implementation advantages already shown by radio tomographic imaging and the two-dimensional xPRA.

What carries the argument

The x3DPRA linear phaseless formulation, obtained by extending the Rytov approximation to three spatial dimensions so that received-signal-strength measurements can be inverted for a volumetric object function.

Load-bearing premise

Extending the phaseless Rytov approximation to three dimensions keeps the same accuracy and linearity that held in two dimensions.

What would settle it

A controlled simulation or measurement in which the x3DPRA-reconstructed object locations, shapes, or attenuation values differ from ground-truth values by more than the error levels reported for the two-dimensional method would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Volumetric imaging becomes feasible with the same received-signal-strength infrastructure already used for two-dimensional methods.
  • The linear phaseless form remains compatible with integrated sensing and communication systems that cannot afford wide bandwidths.
  • Object material properties can be recovered in addition to geometry without requiring phase information.
  • Direct comparison to the two-dimensional model confirms that the three-dimensional extension preserves reconstruction behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Indoor environments equipped with standard Wi-Fi nodes could generate coarse 3D maps of moving objects or people.
  • The same linear model might be stacked with existing communication protocols to add sensing layers without redesigning the physical layer.
  • Scaling the method to larger scenes would still be limited by the number of transmitter-receiver pairs rather than by bandwidth.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the extended three-dimensional phaseless Rytov approximation (x3DPRA) as a 3D extension of the 2D xPRA method for device-free RF imaging from phaseless measurements such as RSS. It claims that the formulation preserves the linear structure and straightforward implementation of RTI and xPRA while enabling volumetric reconstructions, and that simulations show good estimates of object location, shape, and material attenuation. The 3D formulation is presented, validated via 2D model comparison, and assessed through simulation results.

Significance. If the 3D extension proves accurate, the work would meaningfully extend linear phaseless imaging methods to volumetric settings, supporting ISAC applications that avoid wideband requirements. The explicit preservation of linearity and the ability to recover attenuation are potentially useful strengths, though the current validation approach limits the strength of this assessment.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / validation section] Abstract and validation section: the central claim that x3DPRA provides accurate 3D location/shape/attenuation estimates rests on a 2D model comparison plus unspecified simulations. A 2D consistency check confirms reduction to the known case but does not probe 3D-specific effects such as out-of-plane propagation or integration of the 3D Green's function inside the phaseless Rytov log-intensity model; this leaves the volumetric accuracy untested and is load-bearing for the main contribution.
  2. [Simulation results] Simulation results paragraph: the abstract states that simulations demonstrate performance, yet provides no details on the 3D forward model, discretization, error metrics, comparison baselines, or how the 3D Green's function is handled; without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported estimates support the linearity and accuracy claims for true volumetric scattering.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: typographical error 'commu?nication' should be corrected.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the validation and simulation details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / validation section] Abstract and validation section: the central claim that x3DPRA provides accurate 3D location/shape/attenuation estimates rests on a 2D model comparison plus unspecified simulations. A 2D consistency check confirms reduction to the known case but does not probe 3D-specific effects such as out-of-plane propagation or integration of the 3D Green's function inside the phaseless Rytov log-intensity model; this leaves the volumetric accuracy untested and is load-bearing for the main contribution.

    Authors: The 2D model comparison verifies that the 3D formulation reduces exactly to the known 2D xPRA under planar restriction, confirming algebraic consistency. The x3DPRA derivation starts from the 3D Helmholtz equation, applies the 3D Green's function, and substitutes into the phaseless Rytov log-intensity model, so out-of-plane propagation and 3D integration are included by construction. We nevertheless agree that explicit numerical tests isolating 3D effects (e.g., objects with significant z-extent) would strengthen the central claim. In revision we will add a new subsection presenting full 3D forward simulations with quantitative metrics for location, shape, and attenuation recovery. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation results] Simulation results paragraph: the abstract states that simulations demonstrate performance, yet provides no details on the 3D forward model, discretization, error metrics, comparison baselines, or how the 3D Green's function is handled; without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported estimates support the linearity and accuracy claims for true volumetric scattering.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the simulation description in the current manuscript is too terse. The simulations use a 3D volume discretization, compute RSS via the 3D Green's function inside the log-intensity Rytov model, and reconstruct with the linear x3DPRA operator. To allow assessment, the revised manuscript will expand the simulation section with: explicit 3D forward-model equations, grid resolution and domain size, error metrics (position RMSE, Dice overlap for shape, relative attenuation error), any baseline comparisons, and the precise numerical handling of the 3D Green's function integration. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; 3D extension derived independently with simulation validation

full rationale

The paper presents x3DPRA as a direct mathematical extension of the prior 2D xPRA formulation to three dimensions, followed by a 2D consistency check for reduction and separate simulation results for performance. No equations or claims reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the derivation chain relies on standard wave-propagation approximations extended volumetrically, with external validation via simulations rather than tautological renaming or parameter fitting. The 2D model comparison serves only as a sanity check and does not substitute for the 3D claims, but this is a validation gap rather than circularity in the derivation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract does not specify any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5792 in / 945 out tokens · 21640 ms · 2026-06-27T20:44:49.575917+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The extended Phaseless Rytov Approximation (xPRA) is a recently proposed device-free RF imaging technique that provides high-resolution reconstructions of the imaging region using only phaseless measurements, such as received signal strength (RSS). Because of its phaseless formulation, it can be implemented straightforwardly using existing wireless commu?nication infrastructure. It also outperforms well-known device?free phaseless RF imaging methods such as Radio Tomographic Imaging (RTI). The linear phaseless formulation used in xPRA(and RTI) makes these methods potentially useful for integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems in next generation wireless networks since they do not require wide bandwidths. However, so far, both xPRA and RTI have primarily been formulated in two dimensions (2D). This paper introduces a 3D extension of xPRA, which we call the extended three-dimensional phaseless Rytov approximation (x3DPRA). The novelty of our approach is that it preserves the straightforward implementation advantages of RTI and xPRA while enabling volumetric (3D) imaging. Simulation results show that x3DPRA provides good estimates of location and shape and can also reconstruct object material attenuation. We present the 3D formulation, validate it with a 2D model comparison, and report simulation results demonstrating its performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06933 by Alikhan Umirbayev, Amartansh Dubey, Junhui Rao, Ross Murch, Wanqin Ma, Yijun Chen, Zan Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: This image shows a typical imaging scenario with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The 3D DOI has dimensions of 0.9×0.9×0.3 m3 and sits within a CST bounding box of 0.96 × 0.96 × 0.86 m3 . A total of L = 48 transceivers are equally distributed around the boundary at each of three heights: z = 0, ±0.15 m. For clarity, only the transceivers positioned on the front face of DOI are depicted in this figure. B. Measurement Configurations 1) 2D: To provide verification of our technique, we firs… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 16 Transceiver nodes are placed on a single center plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The configurations used for the 3D configurations, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The result on the left corresponds to the circular ground [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The figures show the 3D reconstruction results and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Integrated Sensing and Communication with Reconfig- urable Intelligent Surfaces: Opportunities, Applications, and Future Directions,

    R. Liu, M. Li, H. Luo, Q. Liu, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Integrated Sensing and Communication with Reconfig- urable Intelligent Surfaces: Opportunities, Applications, and Future Directions,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2023

    2023

  2. [3]

    Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) Transceiver: Hardware Architectures, Enabling Technologies, and Emerging Trends,

    K. Wu, Y . Bigdeli, S. A. Keivaan, J. Deng, and P. Burasa, “Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) Transceiver: Hardware Architectures, Enabling Technologies, and Emerging Trends,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Electromagnetics, Antennas and Prop- agation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–64, 2025

    2025

  3. [4]

    ISAC: From human to environmental sensing,

    K. Wu, Z. Wang, S.-L. Chen, J. A. Zhang, and Y . J. Guo, “ISAC: From human to environmental sensing,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Electromagnetics, Antennas and Propagation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–98, 2025

    2025

  4. [5]

    RF-Sensing: A New Way to Ob- serve Surroundings,

    S. Khunteta, P. Saikrishna, A. Agrawal, A. Kumar, and A. K. R. Chavva, “RF-Sensing: A New Way to Ob- serve Surroundings,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 129 653– 129 665, 2022

    2022

  5. [6]

    Hierarchical adaptive loco-manipulation control for quadruped robots

    A. Chen, X. Wang, K. Shi, S. Zhu, B. Fang, Y . Chen, J. Chen, Y . Huo, and Q. Ye, “ImmFusion: Robust mmWave-RGB Fusion for 3D Human Body Reconstruction in All Weather Conditions,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, May 2023, p. 2752–2758. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10161428

    work page doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161428 2023

  6. [7]

    Noncontact Radio Frequency (RF) Induced Ultrasound in the Brain,

    R. M. Laher, A. J. Fenn, R. W. Haupt, D. J. Brigada, and A. E. Samir, “Noncontact Radio Frequency (RF) Induced Ultrasound in the Brain,” in2022 IEEE International Symposium on Phased Array Systems & Technology (PAST), 2022, pp. 01–06

    2022

  7. [8]

    A device-free high-precision indoor positioning and tracking method based on GMM- WKNN algorithm,

    M. Jiang and J. Yuan, “A device-free high-precision indoor positioning and tracking method based on GMM- WKNN algorithm,”Scientific Reports, vol. 15, p. 17586, 2025

    2025

  8. [9]

    Device-free indoor localisation using radio tomography imaging in 800/900 MHz band,

    S. Adler, S. Schmitt, and M. Kyas, “Device-free indoor localisation using radio tomography imaging in 800/900 MHz band,” in2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2014, pp. 544–553

    2014

  9. [10]

    An indoor device-free lo- calization technique using multipath wireless channel characteristics,

    T. Ikegami and M. Kim, “An indoor device-free lo- calization technique using multipath wireless channel characteristics,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Asia (ICCE-Asia), 2022, pp. 1–4

    2022

  10. [11]

    Indoor device-free passive localization with DCNN for location-based ser- vices,

    L. Zhao, C. Su, Z. Dai, and et al., “Indoor device-free passive localization with DCNN for location-based ser- vices,”The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 8432–8449, 2020

    2020

  11. [12]

    A real-time device-free localization system using correlated RSS measurements,

    Z. Yang, K. Huang, X. Guo, and et al., “A real-time device-free localization system using correlated RSS measurements,”EURASIP Journal on Wireless Commu- nications and Networking, vol. 2013, p. 186, 2013

    2013

  12. [13]

    Robust device-free wireless localization based on dif- ferential rss measurements,

    J. Wang, Q. Gao, Y . Yu, P. Cheng, L. Wu, and H. Wang, “Robust device-free wireless localization based on dif- ferential rss measurements,”Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 60, pp. 5943–5952, 12 2013. 11

    2013

  13. [14]

    Device-free localization with multidimensional wireless link information,

    J. Wang, Q. Gao, H. Wang, P. Cheng, and K. Xin, “Device-free localization with multidimensional wireless link information,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Tech- nology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 356–366, 2015

    2015

  14. [15]

    Ichnaea: A low- overhead robust wlan device-free passive localization system,

    A. Saeed, A. E. Kosba, and M. Youssef, “Ichnaea: A low- overhead robust wlan device-free passive localization system,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2014

    2014

  15. [16]

    Lightweight robust device-free localization in wireless networks,

    J. Wang, Q. Gao, P. Cheng, Y . Yu, K. Xin, and H. Wang, “Lightweight robust device-free localization in wireless networks,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 5681–5689, 2014

    2014

  16. [17]

    Spatial models for human motion-induced signal strength variance on static links,

    N. Patwari and J. Wilson, “Spatial models for human motion-induced signal strength variance on static links,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Secu- rity, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 791–802, 2011

    2011

  17. [18]

    A fade-level skew-laplace signal strength model for device-free localization with wireless networks,

    J. Wilson and N. Patwari, “A fade-level skew-laplace signal strength model for device-free localization with wireless networks,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Com- puting, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 947–958, 2012

    2012

  18. [19]

    A bayesian approach to device-free localization: Modeling and experimental assessment,

    S. Savazzi, M. Nicoli, F. Carminati, and M. Riva, “A bayesian approach to device-free localization: Modeling and experimental assessment,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–29, 2014

    2014

  19. [20]

    Unrolled op- timization with deep learning-based priors for phaseless inverse scattering problems,

    S. Deshmukh, A. Dubey, and R. Murch, “Unrolled op- timization with deep learning-based priors for phaseless inverse scattering problems,”IEEE Transactions on Geo- science and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–14, 2022

    2022

  20. [21]

    3D Imaging from Multipath Temporal Echoes,

    A. Turpin, V . Kapitany, J. Radford, D. Rovelli, K. Mitchell, A. Lyons, I. Starshynov, and D. Faccio, “3D Imaging from Multipath Temporal Echoes,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, p. 174301, Apr 2021. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.174301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.174301 2021

  21. [22]

    Full 3-D Imaging of Vertical Structures via Ground- Penetrating Radar,

    G. Gennarelli, G. Ludeno, I. Catapano, and F. Soldovieri, “Full 3-D Imaging of Vertical Structures via Ground- Penetrating Radar,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 8857–8873, 2020

    2020

  22. [23]

    3D Tomographic Image Reconstruction for Multistatic Ground Penetrating Radar,

    M. Pereira, Y . Zhang, D. Orfeo, D. Burns, D. Huston, and T. Xia, “3D Tomographic Image Reconstruction for Multistatic Ground Penetrating Radar,” in2019 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf), 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  23. [24]

    Three-dimensional ray- based tomographic approach for contactless gpr imag- ing,

    G. Gennarelli, C. Noviello, G. Ludeno, G. Esposito, F. Soldovieri, and I. Catapano, “Three-dimensional ray- based tomographic approach for contactless gpr imag- ing,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1–14, 2023

    2023

  24. [25]

    275–305 GHz FM- CW Radar 3D Imaging for Walk-Through Security Body Scanner,

    T. Ikari, Y . Sasaki, and C. Otani, “275–305 GHz FM- CW Radar 3D Imaging for Walk-Through Security Body Scanner,”Photonics, vol. 10, p. 343, 03 2023

    2023

  25. [26]

    Enhanced 3-D Building Layout Tomographic Imaging via Tensor Approach,

    J. Chen, N. Li, S. Guo, F. Yu, G. Cui, and L. Kong, “Enhanced 3-D Building Layout Tomographic Imaging via Tensor Approach,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 62, pp. 1–14, 2024

    2024

  26. [27]

    Radio Tomographic Imaging with Wireless Networks,

    J. Wilson and N. Patwari, “Radio Tomographic Imaging with Wireless Networks,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 621–632, 2010

    2010

  27. [28]

    See-through walls: Motion tracking using variance-based radio tomography networks,

    ——, “See-through walls: Motion tracking using variance-based radio tomography networks,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 612–621, 2011

    2011

  28. [29]

    Demo abstract: Histogram distance-based radio tomographic localization,

    Y . Zhao and N. Patwari, “Demo abstract: Histogram distance-based radio tomographic localization,” in2012 ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on Informa- tion Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2012, pp. 129–130

    2012

  29. [30]

    Radio tomographic imaging using multiple channels and trans- mit power levels,

    G. Barrogo, A. Rivas, and M. C. Talampas, “Radio tomographic imaging using multiple channels and trans- mit power levels,” in2019 International Symposium on Multimedia and Communication Technology (ISMAC), 2019, pp. 1–4

    2019

  30. [31]

    Radio Tomographic Imaging With Recon- figurable Intelligent Surfaces,

    Z. Li, A. Dubey, S. Shen, N. K. Kundu, J. Rao, and R. Murch, “Radio Tomographic Imaging With Recon- figurable Intelligent Surfaces,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 15 784– 15 797, 2024

    2024

  31. [32]

    A Phaseless Extended Rytov Approxima- tion for Strongly Scattering Low-Loss Media and Its Application to Indoor Imaging,

    A. Dubey, S. Deshmukh, L. Pan, X. Chen, and R. Murch, “A Phaseless Extended Rytov Approxima- tion for Strongly Scattering Low-Loss Media and Its Application to Indoor Imaging,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–17, 2022

    2022

  32. [33]

    Reconciling Radio Tomographic Imaging With Phaseless Inverse Scatter- ing,

    A. Dubey, Z. Li, and R. Murch, “Reconciling Radio Tomographic Imaging With Phaseless Inverse Scatter- ing,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 1837–1849, 2024

    2024

  33. [34]

    Radio Tomography for Roadside Surveillance,

    C. R. Anderson, R. K. Martin, T. O. Walker, and R. W. Thomas, “Radio Tomography for Roadside Surveillance,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 66–79, 2014

    2014

  34. [35]

    Three-Dimensional Device-Free Localization for Vehicle,

    M. Wang, J. Yang, B. Huang, Y . Yang, and Y . Xu, “Three-Dimensional Device-Free Localization for Vehicle,”Sensors, vol. 20, no. 13, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/13/3775

    2020

  35. [36]

    Identifying High-Traffic Patterns in the Workplace With Radio Tomographic Imaging in 3D Wireless Sensor Networks,

    T. S. Danella, “Identifying High-Traffic Patterns in the Workplace With Radio Tomographic Imaging in 3D Wireless Sensor Networks,” Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Ohio, the U.S.A, 2014, m.S. thesis

    2014

  36. [37]

    3D Through-Wall Imag- ing with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using WiFi,

    C. R. Karanam and Y . Mostofi, “3D Through-Wall Imag- ing with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using WiFi,” in2017 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Informa- tion Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2017, pp. 131–142

    2017

  37. [38]

    Inline 3D V olu- metric Measurement of Moisture Content in Rice Using Regression-Based ML of RF Tomographic Imaging,

    A. Almaleeh, A. Zakaria, L. Kamarudin, M. H. Faza- lul Rahiman, D. Ndzi, and I. Ismail, “Inline 3D V olu- metric Measurement of Moisture Content in Rice Using Regression-Based ML of RF Tomographic Imaging,” 01 2022

    2022

  38. [39]

    Hecht,Optics, 5th ed

    E. Hecht,Optics, 5th ed. London, U.K.: Pearson, 2012

    2012

  39. [40]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics: Electromag- netic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, 7th ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2013

    2013

  40. [41]

    R. E. Collin,Antennas and Radiowave Propagation. New York, NY , USA: McGraw-Hill, 1985. 12

    1985

  41. [42]

    An enhanced approach to imaging the in- door environment using wifi rssi measurements,

    A. Dubey, P. Sood, J. Santos, D. Ma, C.-Y . Chiu, and R. Murch, “An enhanced approach to imaging the in- door environment using wifi rssi measurements,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 8415–8430, 2021

    2021

  42. [43]

    Chen,Computational Methods for Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering, ser

    X. Chen,Computational Methods for Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering, ser. Wiley-IEEE Press. Hobo- ken, NJ, USA: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2017, print ISBN: 9781119311980

    2017

  43. [44]

    DiffusionEMIS: Diffusion Model for 3-D Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering,

    X. Bi, Y . Chen, and L. Li, “DiffusionEMIS: Diffusion Model for 3-D Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 62, pp. 1–12, 2024

    2024

  44. [45]

    A wavelet-based com- pressive deep learning scheme for inverse scattering problems,

    Z. Zong, Y . Wang, and Z. Wei, “A wavelet-based com- pressive deep learning scheme for inverse scattering problems,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Re- mote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–11, 2022

    2022

  45. [46]

    Inverse scattering approach to integration of communication and sensing,

    L. Wen, S. Zhao, T. Yin, Y . Guo, and X. Chen, “Inverse scattering approach to integration of communication and sensing,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Electro- magnetics, Antennas and Propagation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–36, 2025

    2025

  46. [47]

    Unified approach to pml absorbing media,

    D. Werner and R. Mittra, “Unified approach to pml absorbing media,” inAnnual Review of Progress in Ap- plied Computational Electromagnetics, Anon, Ed., vol. 1. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Soc, 1998, pp. 515–522, proceedings of the 1998 14th Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics. Part 1 (of 2) ; Conference date: 16-...

    1998

  47. [48]

    Wave propagation, scattering and imaging using dual-domain one-way and one-return propagators,

    R. S. Wu, “Wave propagation, scattering and imaging using dual-domain one-way and one-return propagators,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 509– 539, Mar. 2003

    2003

  48. [49]

    Optimization in the regularization of ill-posed problems,

    A. Davies and R. Anderssen, “Optimization in the regularization of ill-posed problems,”The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series B. Applied Mathematics, vol. 28, pp. 114 – 133, 07 1986

    1986

  49. [50]

    Implementation of an Optimal First-Order Method for Strongly Convex Total Variation Regularization,

    T. L. Jensen, J. H. Jørgensen, P. C. Hansen, and et al., “Implementation of an Optimal First-Order Method for Strongly Convex Total Variation Regularization,”BIT Numerical Mathematics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 329–356, Jun. 2012

    2012

  50. [51]

    User’s Guide for TV AL3: TV Minimization by Augmented Lagrangian and Alter- nating Direction Algorithms,

    C. Li, W. Yin, and Y . Zhang, “User’s Guide for TV AL3: TV Minimization by Augmented Lagrangian and Alter- nating Direction Algorithms,” 2010. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17798338

    2010

  51. [52]

    Resolution analyses of radar tomographic imaging for arbitrary angle aperture,

    X. Wei, X. Ding, Z. Liu, and M. Fan, “Resolution analyses of radar tomographic imaging for arbitrary angle aperture,”IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 957–961, 2013

    2013

  52. [53]

    The impact of phase information on the imaging performance of the extended phaseless rytov approximation,

    Z. Li, A. Dubey, and R. Murch, “The impact of phase information on the imaging performance of the extended phaseless rytov approximation,”IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 989–1000, 2025

    2025

  53. [54]

    A task-oriented deep learning approach for human localization,

    Y .-J. Chen, W. Chen, S. Q. Zhang, H.-Y . Huang, and H. Kung, “A task-oriented deep learning approach for human localization,”IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 525–539, 2025

    2025