pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07331 · v1 · pith:WLRBHYM6new · submitted 2026-06-05 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn

Performance analysis of classical adiabatic annealing on Ising machines

Jacob Lamers , Guy Verschaffelt , Guy Van der Sande This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nn
keywords Ising machinesclassical adiabatic annealingMaxCutcombinatorial optimizationcontinuation methodshybrid strategyenergy landscapes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid classical adiabatic annealing on Ising machines yields only marginal gains and no practical advantage over simpler methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether gradually changing the Hamiltonian from a simple starting point to the target Ising problem improves solution quality on combinatorial tasks. Continuation methods are used to analyze the dynamics and motivate a hybrid variant that mixes the annealing schedule with other steps. Benchmarks on MaxCut graphs of up to 800 vertices and on instances that include external fields show small improvements only for a narrow subset of cases. The authors therefore conclude that the extra machinery does not justify replacing established direct techniques.

Core claim

Although a hybrid classical adiabatic annealing schedule can be derived from continuation analysis and occasionally produces slightly better low-energy states, systematic tests on MaxCut problems with up to 800 spins and on problems with external fields demonstrate that the gains remain marginal and do not outweigh the simplicity of existing non-annealing heuristics.

What carries the argument

The hybrid classical adiabatic annealing strategy, formed by combining a gradual Hamiltonian transformation with additional optimization steps and analyzed through continuation methods.

If this is right

  • On MaxCut instances up to 800 spins the hybrid schedule produces only marginal improvement for a limited subset of graphs.
  • Problems that include external fields likewise receive limited benefit from the hybrid approach.
  • Simpler existing techniques remain the preferable choice for practical use on Ising machines.
  • Theoretical motivation drawn from the quantum adiabatic theorem does not translate into substantial performance gains in the classical setting.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the marginal-gain result generalizes, development effort on classical Ising machines could shift toward heuristics that avoid annealing schedules altogether.
  • Continuation methods could be reused to diagnose why other proposed annealing variants also fail to deliver large advantages.
  • For problem classes larger than those tested, any small gains observed here may shrink further relative to direct methods.

Load-bearing premise

The MaxCut instances up to 800 spins and the problems with external fields are representative of the optimization tasks where classical adiabatic annealing would be applied.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment on a wider collection of problem sizes or different combinatorial tasks that records consistently large improvements from the hybrid schedule would falsify the claim that it offers insufficient practical advantage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07331 by Guy Van der Sande, Guy Verschaffelt, Jacob Lamers.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Typical example of the evolution under classical adiabatic annealing. Continuation as the interpolation parameter F varies from zero to one of (a) the spin amplitudes of problem g05 60.3 for α = 0 and β = 0.25, (b) spin amplitude 6 in the black rectangle of (a), (c) the energy calculated using the target coupling matrix. (d) Zoom of the energy evolution in the black rectangle of (c). The energy of the grou… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Critical β values for problem g05 60.3. βcrit as a function of the interpolation parameter F for α = 0. βmin is defined by adding 0.02 to the maximum βcrit value over all F values and is indicated by the orange line. distance of 0.02 above the maximum value of βcrit: βmin = max F (βcrit) + 0.02. (6) This choice ensures that the CAA is performed with a value of β that is as low as possible while avoiding dr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Positions of the saddle node bifurcations for problem g05 60.3(a) The value of the interpolation parameter F of the two saddle node bifurcations (SNs) as a function of the coupling strength β. The Cusp point is indicated by a black dot, annotated with CP 1. (b)-(d) The evolution of spin amplitude 6, used as a proxy of the fixed point, as a function of F for three different fixed β values (0.22, 0.235 and 0… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Continuation of CAA using βmin followed by RA for problem g05 60.3 with α = 0.(a): evolution of all spin amplitudes as the interpolation parameter F is increased from zero to one for a fixed β = βmin = 0.222. (b) application of RA to the final state of panel (a). The energy calculated using the target coupling matrix for both (c) CAA and (d) RA. The energy of the ground state of the binary Hamiltonian is r… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the SR and TTT for the example adiabatic easy problem g05 60.3, plotted as a function of both annealing speeds vβ and vF . In panel (a), the region with the highest SR is at low vβ and low vF . This indicates that when both an￾nealing stages proceed sufficiently slowly, the IM consistently finds the ground state, as is expected for an adiabatic easy problem. Within this region, since the SR is unifor… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Parameter scan of the hybrid CAA method for an adiabatic hard problem. (a) success rate (SR) and (b) time￾to-target (TTT) as a function of the annealing speed vβ and the adiabatic annealing speed vF for problem g05 100.3, fixed linear gain α = −3.5 and noise strength γ = 0.1. A TTT of infinity is colored white [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (b). At this higher noise level, only four instances remain unsolved by both methods, compared to eight at lower noise. Now, there is one instance that can be solved with RA, but not with the hybrid CAA. For instances that can be solved by both approaches, the performance advantage of the hybrid CAA method is reduced as the data points lie closer to the diagonal, and the hybrid CAA method is now only about… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Performance comparison on Beasley instances. Comparison of the time-to-target (TTT) of the hybrid CAA with regular annealing (RA) when employing the spin sign method (b) or (a) not. Each dot represents a problem instance. Its y coordinate represents the TTT when it is solved using the hybrid CAA method and its x coordinate the TTT when solved using RA. Dots below the diagonal, indicated by the green backgr… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Continuation of CAA starting from a ferromagnetic Mobius graph. ¨ Evolution as F varies from zero to one of (a) the spin amplitudes of problem g05 60.0 for α = −0.5 and β = βmin, (b) spin amplitude 6 in the black rectangle of Fig. (a). Solid (dashed) lines are used when the spin amplitude is part of a stable (unstable) state. SN (green and yellow dots) indicate saddle-node bifurcations 0.05 0.10 0.15 start… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Performance dependence on the initial coupling strength. The time-to-target (TTT) of the linear hybrid CAA method using the spin sign method on Beasley instance bqp50- 1 as a function of initial coupling strength βstart. The values of the TTT are obtained using the following fixed parameters: α = −2.1, Nt = 1000, vβ = 0.001 and γ = 0.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ising machines are a promising approach to solve combinatorial optimization problems. They map these problems onto the Ising model and search for low-energy configurations. However, navigating the rugged energy landscapes of these systems remains difficult. To improve this navigation, classical adiabatic annealing has been proposed in the literature as a heuristic optimization method for classical Ising machines. Using this technique, the Hamiltonian of the Ising machine is gradually transformed from an easily solvable Hamiltonian to the target Hamiltonian. However, its purported effectiveness is primarily motivated by an analogy to quantum adiabatic annealing, and systematic benchmarking has remained limited. In this work, we analyze the classical adiabatic annealing technique using continuation methods. Motivated by insights from this analysis, we propose an optimized annealing strategy we refer to as hybrid classical adiabatic annealing. We benchmark our proposed strategy using MaxCut instances with up to 800 spins and problems with external fields, for which it achieves a marginal improvement for a limited set of problems. We conclude that, although theoretically motivated and occasionally beneficial, the hybrid strategy does not offer a sufficient practical advantage over simpler, existing techniques.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes classical adiabatic annealing for Ising machines via continuation methods, proposes a hybrid annealing strategy motivated by this analysis, and benchmarks the hybrid approach on MaxCut instances (up to 800 spins) and problems with external fields. It reports marginal improvement on only a limited subset of problems and concludes that the hybrid strategy lacks sufficient practical advantage over simpler existing techniques, despite its theoretical motivation from the quantum adiabatic analogy.

Significance. If the empirical results hold under scrutiny, the work offers a useful caution against over-reliance on quantum-inspired heuristics for classical Ising machines, grounded in continuation-method analysis rather than ad-hoc fitting. The direct benchmarking against standard MaxCut instances (rather than self-referential or fitted-parameter derivations) is a strength, but the limited scope tempers broader impact on the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and benchmarking results] Abstract and benchmarking results: the claim of 'marginal improvement for a limited set of problems' is load-bearing for the central negative conclusion on practical advantage, yet the manuscript provides no details on the number of instances tested, choice of statistical tests, error bars, or the precise parameterization and implementation of the hybrid schedule (including how continuation-method insights were translated into the schedule).
  2. [Benchmarking results] Benchmarking results: no explicit argument or additional experiments are given to establish that MaxCut instances (≤800 spins) and external-field problems are representative of the hardness regimes or scales where classical adiabatic annealing would be deployed on Ising machines in practice; the negative conclusion on practical utility therefore rests on an unverified representativeness assumption.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below with clarifications and proposed revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and benchmarking results] Abstract and benchmarking results: the claim of 'marginal improvement for a limited set of problems' is load-bearing for the central negative conclusion on practical advantage, yet the manuscript provides no details on the number of instances tested, choice of statistical tests, error bars, or the precise parameterization and implementation of the hybrid schedule (including how continuation-method insights were translated into the schedule).

    Authors: We agree that greater transparency on the experimental protocol is necessary to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add: the total number of MaxCut instances evaluated, the statistical tests used to compare solvers, error bars (standard deviation across runs), and an explicit description of the hybrid schedule, including the mapping from continuation-method analysis to the chosen annealing parameters and switching points between classical and hybrid phases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Benchmarking results] Benchmarking results: no explicit argument or additional experiments are given to establish that MaxCut instances (≤800 spins) and external-field problems are representative of the hardness regimes or scales where classical adiabatic annealing would be deployed on Ising machines in practice; the negative conclusion on practical utility therefore rests on an unverified representativeness assumption.

    Authors: We chose these instance sizes because they align with the operating range of current Ising-machine hardware and with standard MaxCut benchmarks in the literature. We will insert a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript that cites typical problem scales reported for Ising machines and explains why the tested regimes are relevant to practical deployment. Additional experiments at substantially larger scales lie outside the computational resources available for this study; the current benchmarks nevertheless provide a direct, reproducible basis for the cautious conclusion drawn. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical benchmarking without circular derivation

full rationale

The paper's analysis relies on continuation methods to motivate a hybrid annealing strategy, followed by direct benchmarking on MaxCut instances (up to 800 spins) and external-field problems. The conclusion of marginal practical advantage follows from these empirical results rather than any self-referential derivation, fitted-parameter prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations or claims reduce by construction to the inputs; the work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard dynamical-systems tools and empirical testing without introducing new physical entities or many explicit free parameters beyond those implicit in any annealing schedule.

free parameters (1)
  • hybrid annealing schedule parameters
    Parameters controlling the hybrid mixing of continuation and other heuristics are likely chosen or tuned but not quantified in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Continuation methods yield reliable insights into the trajectory of classical Ising systems during annealing.
    The analysis and hybrid proposal are explicitly motivated by insights obtained from continuation methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5718 in / 1138 out tokens · 30107 ms · 2026-06-27T21:48:46.293717+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ising formulations of many NP prob- lems

    Andrew Lucas. “Ising formulations of many NP prob- lems”. In:Frontiers in physics2 (2014), p. 74887

    2014

  2. [2]

    Quantum computing for finance: Overview and prospects

    Rom ´an Or ´us, Samuel Mugel, and Enrique Lizaso. “Quantum computing for finance: Overview and prospects”. In:Reviews in Physics4 (2019), p. 100028

    2019

  3. [3]

    Exploring Potential Applications of Ising Machines for Power System Operations

    Kenta Kirihara et al. “Exploring Potential Applications of Ising Machines for Power System Operations”. In: IEEE Access11 (June 2023), pp. 68004 –68017.DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3289720

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2023.3289720 2023

  4. [4]

    Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer

    Florian Neukart et al. “Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer”. In:Frontiers in ICT4 (2017), p. 29

    2017

  5. [5]

    A case study in programming a quantum annealer for hard operational planning prob- lems

    Eleanor G Rieffel et al. “A case study in programming a quantum annealer for hard operational planning prob- lems”. In:Quantum Information Processing14 (2015), pp. 1–36

    2015

  6. [6]

    Supply chain logistics with quantum and classical annealing algorithms

    Sean J. Weinberg et al. “Supply chain logistics with quantum and classical annealing algorithms”. In:Sci- entific Reports13 (1 2023).DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023- 31765-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023- 2023

  7. [7]

    npj Quantum Information , author =

    Richard Y . Li et al. “Quantum annealing versus classical machine learning applied to a simplified computational biology problem”. In:npj Quantum Information4 (1 2018).DOI: 10.1038/s41534-018-0060-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0060-8 2018

  8. [8]

    Construction of model Hamiltonians for adiabatic quantum computation and its application to finding low-energy conformations of lattice protein models

    Alejandro Perdomo et al. “Construction of model Hamiltonians for adiabatic quantum computation and its application to finding low-energy conformations of lattice protein models”. In:Physical Review A78.1 (2008), p. 012320

    2008

  9. [9]

    Ising machines as hardware solvers of combinatorial optimization problems

    Naeimeh Mohseni, Peter L McMahon, and Tim Byrnes. “Ising machines as hardware solvers of combinatorial optimization problems”. In:Nature Reviews Physics4.6 (2022), pp. 363–379

    2022

  10. [10]

    Quantum annealing with man- ufactured spins

    Mark W Johnson et al. “Quantum annealing with man- ufactured spins”. In:Nature473.7346 (2011), pp. 194– 198

    2011

  11. [11]

    Physics-Inspired Optimization for Quadratic Unconstrained Problems Using a Digital Annealer

    Maliheh Aramon et al. “Physics-Inspired Optimization for Quadratic Unconstrained Problems Using a Digital Annealer”. In:Frontiers in Physics7 (Apr. 2019), p. 48. DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00048

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2019.00048 2019

  12. [12]

    Large-scale photonic Ising machine by spatial light modulation

    D Pierangeli, G Marcucci, and C Conti. “Large-scale photonic Ising machine by spatial light modulation”. In:Physical review letters122.21 (2019), p. 213902

    2019

  13. [13]

    Probabilistic computing with p-bits

    Jan Kaiser and Supriyo Datta. “Probabilistic computing with p-bits”. In:Applied Physics Letters119 (15 2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0067927

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0067927 2021

  14. [14]

    Stochasticp-Bits for In- vertible Logic

    Kerem Yunus Camsari et al. “Stochasticp-Bits for In- vertible Logic”. In:Phys. Rev. X7 (3 2017), p. 031014. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.031014 2017

  15. [15]

    Integrated probabilistic com- puter using voltage-controlled magnetic tunnel junctions as its entropy source

    Christian Duffee et al. “Integrated probabilistic com- puter using voltage-controlled magnetic tunnel junctions as its entropy source”. In:ArXiv(2024).DOI: 10.48550/ arXiv.2412.08017

    arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    A coherent Ising machine for 2000-node optimization problems

    Takahiro Inagaki et al. “A coherent Ising machine for 2000-node optimization problems”. In:Science 354.6312 (2016), pp. 603–606

    2000

  17. [17]

    100,000-spin coherent Ising machine

    Toshimori Honjo et al. “100,000-spin coherent Ising machine”. In:Science advances7.40 (2021), eabh0952

    2021

  18. [18]

    A poor man’s coherent Ising machine based on opto-electronic feedback systems for solving optimiza- tion problems

    Fabian B ¨ohm, Guy Verschaffelt, and Guy Van der Sande. “A poor man’s coherent Ising machine based on opto-electronic feedback systems for solving optimiza- tion problems”. In:Nature communications10.1 (2019), p. 3538

    2019

  19. [19]

    Programmable 200 GOPS Hopfield-inspired photonic Ising machine

    Nayem Al-Kayed et al. “Programmable 200 GOPS Hopfield-inspired photonic Ising machine”. In:Nature 648 (2025), pp. 576–584.DOI: 10 . 1364 / OPTICA . 398000

    2025

  20. [20]

    An Ising machine based on net- works of subharmonic electrical resonators

    L. Q. English et al. “An Ising machine based on net- works of subharmonic electrical resonators”. In:Com- munications Physics5 (1 2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    Efficient combinatorial optimiza- tion by quantum-inspired parallel annealing in analogue memristor crossbar

    Mingrui Jiang et al. “Efficient combinatorial optimiza- tion by quantum-inspired parallel annealing in analogue memristor crossbar”. In:Nature communications14.1 (2023), p. 5927

    2023

  22. [22]

    Realizing the classical XY Hamiltonian in polariton simulators

    Natalia G Berloff et al. “Realizing the classical XY Hamiltonian in polariton simulators”. In:Nature ma- terials16.11 (2017), pp. 1120–1126

    2017

  23. [23]

    Global op- timization of spin Hamiltonians with gain-dissipative systems

    Kirill P Kalinin and Natalia G Berloff. “Global op- timization of spin Hamiltonians with gain-dissipative systems”. In:Scientific reports8.1 (2018), p. 17791

    2018

  24. [24]

    Science , author =

    Edward Farhi et al. “A Quantum Adiabatic Evolu- tion Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem”. In:Science292.5516 (2001), pp. 472–475.DOI: 10.1126/science.1057726

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1057726 2001

  25. [25]

    Wilkinson and E

    Giuseppe E Santoro and Erio Tosatti. “Optimization using quantum mechanics: quantum annealing through adiabatic evolution”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General39.36 (2006).DOI: 10.1088/0305- 4470/39/36/R01

    work page doi:10.1088/0305- 2006

  26. [26]

    Adiabatic evolution on a spatial-photonic Ising ma- chine

    Davide Pierangeli, Giulia Marcucci, and Claudio Conti. “Adiabatic evolution on a spatial-photonic Ising ma- chine”. In:Optica7.11 (2020), pp. 1535–1543.DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.398000

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.398000 2020

  27. [27]

    Kumar, T

    S. Kumar, T. Van Vaerenbergh, and J. P. Strachan.Clas- sical Adiabatic Annealing in Memristor Hopfield Neural Networks for Combinatorial Optimization. 2020 Inter- national Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC), Atlanta, GA, USA. 2020.DOI: 10 . 1109 / ICRC2020 . 2020.00016

    arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Geometric Landscape Annealing as an Optimization Principle Underlying the Coherent Ising Machine

    Atsushi Yamamura, Hideo Mabuchi, and Surya Ganguli. “Geometric Landscape Annealing as an Optimization Principle Underlying the Coherent Ising Machine”. In: Phys. Rev. X14 (3 2024), p. 031054.DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevX.14.031054

    2024

  29. [29]

    Using continuation methods to analyse the difficulty of problems solved by Ising machines

    Jacob Lamers, Guy Verschaffelt, and Guy Van der Sande. “Using continuation methods to analyse the difficulty of problems solved by Ising machines”. In: Communications Physics7 (1 2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Predicting the optimal noise strength for solving op- timization problems with analog Ising machines

    Leen Mys, Guy Verschaffelt, and Guy Van der Sande. “Predicting the optimal noise strength for solving op- timization problems with analog Ising machines”. In: Phys. Rev. Appl.25 (3 2026), p. 034068.DOI: 10.1103/ czsz-z8ng. 12

    2026

  31. [31]

    High-performance combinatorial optimization based on classical mechanics

    Hayato Goto et al. “High-performance combinatorial optimization based on classical mechanics”. In:Science Advances7.6 (2021), eabe7953

    2021

  32. [32]

    Mean-field coherent Ising machines with artificial Zee- man terms

    Mastiyage Don Sudeera Hasaranga Gunathilaka et al. “Mean-field coherent Ising machines with artificial Zee- man terms”. In:J. Appl. Phys134 (23 2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    How to Incorporate External Fields in Analog Ising Machines

    Robbe De Prins et al. “How to Incorporate External Fields in Analog Ising Machines”. In:ArXiv(2025). DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08796

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.08796 2025

  34. [34]

    Order-of-magnitude differences in computational performance of analog Ising machines induced by the choice of nonlinearity

    Fabian B ¨ohm et al. “Order-of-magnitude differences in computational performance of analog Ising machines induced by the choice of nonlinearity”. In:Communi- cations Physics4.1 (2021), p. 149

    2021

  35. [35]

    2007.URL: https : / / biqmac

    Angelika Wiegele.Biq Mac Library - A collection of Max-Cut and quadratic 0-1 programming instances of medium size. 2007.URL: https : / / biqmac . aau . at / biqmaclib.pdf

    2007

  36. [36]

    Y . Ye.GSET. Accessed: 2025-05-21.URL: https://web. stanford.edu/∼yyye/yyye/Gset/

    2025

  37. [37]

    Doedel et al.AUTO-07p: Continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations

    Eusebius J. Doedel et al.AUTO-07p: Continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations. 2007

    2007

  38. [38]

    A multiple search operator heuristic for the max-k-cut problem

    Fuda Ma and Jin-Kao Hao. “A multiple search operator heuristic for the max-k-cut problem”. In:Annals of Operations Research248.1 (2017), pp. 365–403

    2017

  39. [39]

    Computational complexity continuum within Ising formulation of NP problems

    Kirill P Kalinin and Natalia G Berloff. “Computational complexity continuum within Ising formulation of NP problems”. In:Communications Physics5.1 (2022), p. 20. 13 VIII. APPENDIX A. Initial Hamiltonian A natural choice for the initial Hamiltonian is one whose ground state is easily found. A class of such problems is known as spectral easy problems [29], ...

    2022