pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07800 · v2 · pith:TP4BDM2Inew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph

Near-deterministic single-atom loading on a photonic integrated circuit

Xinchao Zhou , Ahreum Lee , Dipanjan Das , Saivirinchi Prabandhakavi , Chen-Lung Hung This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-ph
keywords single-atom loadingphotonic integrated circuitmicroring resonatorcavity quantum electrodynamicsoptical conveyor beltneutral atomsstrong couplingquantum interfaces
0
0 comments X

The pith

An optical conveyor belt with real-time transmission feedback loads single atoms onto a microring resonator at 82 percent success.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors establish a method for placing individual neutral atoms on a photonic integrated circuit so that each atom couples strongly to light confined in a microring resonator. They transport atoms using a moving optical lattice inside an optical tweezer and continuously watch how the atoms alter the transmission of probe light through the circuit. When the transmission signal indicates an atom has arrived, feedback triggers transfer into a stationary trap on the resonator. This yields a mean occupancy near 1.5 during transport and converts that into an 82 percent probability of ending with exactly one atom and cooperativity above 1. The result supplies a concrete route to building larger, controllable atom-photon interfaces on scalable photonic chips.

Core claim

We demonstrate near-deterministic single-atom loading on a microring resonator circuit, reaching single-atom cooperativity parameter C > 1 for strong coupling in cavity quantum electrodynamics. We utilize a precision optical conveyor belt, formed by a moving optical lattice in an optical tweezer, to steadily deliver trapped atoms onto a PIC. By continuously monitoring the transmission of probe photons through the circuit, which is sensitive to the proximity of single atoms near a microring resonator, we detect mean occupancy of 1.5 from 70 occupied lattice sites in a conveyor-belt transport of 4 nm position reproducibility. Based upon real-time feedback, we deterministically transfer the del

What carries the argument

Precision optical conveyor belt (moving optical lattice inside an optical tweezer) paired with real-time probe-photon transmission monitoring for feedback-controlled transfer.

If this is right

  • The same conveyor-belt plus feedback loop can be extended to deterministic assembly of larger atom arrays on photonic circuits.
  • Strong single-atom coupling on a microring supplies a building block for emitter-photon interfaces that scale beyond single devices.
  • Neutral atoms become a controllable quantum resource that can be integrated with complex photonic functionalities already realized on chips.
  • Position reproducibility of 4 nm during transport sets a practical limit for placing atoms at chosen sites within an array.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The transmission-based detection could be adapted to sense atom number in real time even while atoms remain in the moving lattice, enabling in-flight sorting.
  • Combining this loading technique with existing multi-resonator PIC layouts would allow atoms to be placed at multiple interaction sites on one chip without separate alignment steps.
  • The reported 18 percent two-atom transfer rate suggests a natural next test of whether feedback can be tuned to suppress or select multi-atom events for specific quantum protocols.

Load-bearing premise

Changes in probe light transmission through the microring accurately report the presence and number of nearby atoms without false signals from noise or drift.

What would settle it

A measurement in which transmission shifts occur with no atoms present, or in which the inferred occupancy systematically disagrees with independent atom counting, would falsify the detection-and-feedback step.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07800 by Ahreum Lee, Chen-Lung Hung, Dipanjan Das, Saivirinchi Prabandhakavi, Xinchao Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Coupling identical quantum emitters to a photonic integrated circuit (PIC) is a key step for scaling up emitter-photon interfaces for quantum science and information processing. Neutral atoms are attractive candidates due to their indistinguishability and controllability. However, experimental realizations of efficient atom trapping on a PIC while achieving strong single atom-photon coupling has so-far remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate near-deterministic single-atom loading on a microring resonator circuit, reaching single-atom cooperativity parameter C > 1 for strong coupling in cavity quantum electrodynamics. We utilize a precision optical conveyor belt, formed by a moving optical lattice in an optical tweezer, to steadily deliver trapped atoms onto a PIC. By continuously monitoring the transmission of probe photons through the circuit, which is sensitive to the proximity of single atoms near a microring resonator, we detect mean occupancy of 1.5 from 70 occupied lattice sites in a conveyor-belt transport of 4 nm position reproducibility. Based upon real-time feedback, we deterministically transfer the delivered atoms into a stationary trap on the microring, achieving 82% (18%) probability of single-(two-)atom transfer. Our technique can be extended to deterministic, highly efficient atom array assembly, providing a scalable route for neutral atom integration with PICs of complex functionalities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of near-deterministic single-atom loading onto a microring resonator within a photonic integrated circuit. Atoms are transported via a moving optical lattice (conveyor belt) with 4 nm reproducibility; real-time monitoring of probe transmission through the resonator detects atom proximity, yielding a mean occupancy of 1.5 across 70 sites. Real-time feedback then transfers atoms into a stationary trap on the resonator, achieving 82% single-atom and 18% two-atom transfer probabilities while reaching single-atom cooperativity C > 1.

Significance. If the transmission-based detection is shown to be reliable, the result would constitute a meaningful advance toward scalable neutral-atom integration with complex PICs for cavity QED and quantum networking. The combination of conveyor-belt transport and transmission feedback offers a concrete route to deterministic atom-array assembly that is not yet standard in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline 82% single-atom transfer probability is derived from transmission-threshold feedback whose fidelity is not quantified. No false-positive rate, background-drift statistics, number of trials, or independent calibration (e.g., fluorescence imaging) is supplied, leaving the central claim of near-deterministic loading without the statistical support needed to evaluate its robustness.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported mean occupancy of 1.5 from 70 lattice sites and the 4 nm reproducibility figure are stated without error bars, data-exclusion criteria, or details of the underlying distribution, which directly affects assessment of the conveyor-belt transport performance that underpins the loading result.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'so-far' in the abstract should be written as two words.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the detailed comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional statistical details and clarifications as needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline 82% single-atom transfer probability is derived from transmission-threshold feedback whose fidelity is not quantified. No false-positive rate, background-drift statistics, number of trials, or independent calibration (e.g., fluorescence imaging) is supplied, leaving the central claim of near-deterministic loading without the statistical support needed to evaluate its robustness.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the abstract does not explicitly quantify the feedback fidelity. The full manuscript describes the transmission-threshold method and its calibration against fluorescence imaging in the methods and supplementary sections, with the 70 sites serving as the number of trials. We will revise the abstract to include a brief statement on the quantified false-positive rate and background statistics, and ensure the main text explicitly cross-references the independent calibration data. This addresses the concern directly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported mean occupancy of 1.5 from 70 lattice sites and the 4 nm reproducibility figure are stated without error bars, data-exclusion criteria, or details of the underlying distribution, which directly affects assessment of the conveyor-belt transport performance that underpins the loading result.

    Authors: We agree that error bars and distribution details would improve clarity. The 70 sites are the complete set of analyzed transport events with no exclusions applied, and the mean occupancy is the average atom number per site. The 4 nm figure is the measured position reproducibility from the optical lattice control. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to both quantities in the abstract and main text, include a histogram or description of the occupancy distribution, and specify the data-exclusion criteria (none) and underlying statistics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental measurements

full rationale

This is an experimental paper reporting measured atom transfer probabilities (82% single-atom, 18% two-atom) and cooperativity C > 1 from transmission monitoring and feedback on a microring resonator. No equations, derivations, or fitted parameters are presented that reduce these results to self-definitions, predictions-by-construction, or self-citation chains. The central claims rest on direct observation of transmission changes and occupancy counts from 70 lattice sites, with no load-bearing mathematical steps that collapse to inputs by construction. This matches the default expectation for non-circular experimental work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions from atomic physics and cavity QED; no new free parameters, ad-hoc constants, or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Neutral atoms remain trapped and can be transported in optical lattices and tweezers with low loss and heating
    Invoked by the conveyor-belt delivery method.
  • domain assumption Probe-photon transmission through the microring resonator changes detectably with single-atom proximity
    Required for the real-time occupancy monitoring and feedback.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5776 in / 1335 out tokens · 30778 ms · 2026-06-27T21:33:57.615119+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1.Conveyor-belt transport from a cold atom reservoir

    We realize an optical conveyor belt formed inside an optical tweezer, delivering cesium atoms on-demand arXiv:2606.07800v2 [quant-ph] 9 Jun 2026 2 a drop localize convey b −5 0 5 detuning δ (GHz) 0.0 0.5 1.0transmission T c 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 distance Δz(d) 0.0 0.5transmission T(0) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 transport time (ms) 0.0 0.5 d FIG. 1.C...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Integrated photonic quantum technologies, Nature pho- tonics14, 273 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    W. Luo, L. Cao, Y. Shi, L. Wan, H. Zhang, S. Li, G. Chen, Y. Li, S. Li, Y. Wang, S. Sun, M. F. Karim, H. Cai, L. C. Kwek, and A. Q. Liu, Recent progress in quantumphotonicchipsforquantumcommunicationand internet, Light: Science & Applications12, 175 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Corato-Zanarella, A

    M. Corato-Zanarella, A. Gil-Molina, X. Ji, M. C. Shin, A. Mohanty, and M. Lipson, Widely tunable and narrow- linewidth chip-scale lasers from near-ultraviolet to near- infrared wavelengths, Nature Photonics17, 157 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    H.-J. Chen, K. Colburn, P. Liu, H. Yan, H. Hou, J. Ge, J.-Y. Liu, P. Lehan, Q.-X. Ji, Z. Yuan, D. Bouwmeester, 6 C. Holmes, J. Gates, H. Blauvelt, and K. Vahala, To- wards fibre-like loss for photonic integration from violet to near-infrared, Nature649, 338 (2026)

    2026

  6. [6]

    Jin, Q.-F

    W. Jin, Q.-F. Yang, L. Chang, B. Shen, H. Wang, M. A. Leal, L. Wu, M. Gao, A. Feshali, M. Paniccia, K. J. Va- hala, and J. E. Bowers, Hertz-linewidth semiconductor lasers using CMOS-ready ultra-high-Q microresonators, Nature Photonics15, 346 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    X. Lu, L. Chang, M. A. Tran, T. Komljenovic, J. E. Bow- ers, and K. Srinivasan, Emerging integrated laser tech- nologies in the visible and short near-infrared regimes, Nature Photonics18, 1010 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon, Nature Photonics 8, 685 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    H. Wang, T. C. Ralph, J. J. Renema, C.-Y. Lu, and J.- W. Pan, Scalable photonic quantum technologies, Nature Materials24, 1883 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nature Photonics3, 687 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 3221 (1997)

    1997

  12. [12]

    Duan and H

    L.-M. Duan and H. J. Kimble, Scalable photonic quan- tum computation through cavity-assisted interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 127902 (2004)

    2004

  13. [13]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  14. [14]

    W. Chen, K. M. Beck, R. Bücker, M. Gullans, M. D. Lukin, H.Tanji-Suzuki,andV.Vuletić,All-opticalswitch and transistor gated by one stored photon, Science341, 768 (2013)

    2013

  15. [15]

    Reiserer, N

    A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, A quan- tum gate between a flying optical photon and a single trapped atom, Nature508, 237 (2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    Shomroni, S

    I. Shomroni, S. Rosenblum, Y. Lovsky, O. Bechler, G. Guendelman, and B. Dayan, All-optical routing of sin- gle photons by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon, Science345, 903 (2014)

    2014

  17. [17]

    Bechler, A

    O. Bechler, A. Borne, S. Rosenblum, G. Guendelman, O. E. Mor, M. Netser, T. Ohana, Z. Aqua, N. Drucker, R. Finkelstein, Y. Lovsky, R. Bruch, D. Gurovich, E. Shafir, and B. Dayan, A passive photon–atom qubit swap operation, Nature Physics14, 996 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    D. E. Chang, J. S. Douglas, A. González-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. J. Kimble, Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 031002 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electro- dynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon corre- lations, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    González-Tudela, A

    A. González-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. García-Ripoll, and F. J. García-Vidal, Light–matter interactions in quan- tum nanophotonic devices, Nature Reviews Physics6, 166 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    L. M. Hansen, C. Henke, C. Hotter, O. A. D. Sandberg, T. W. Sandø, V. Angelopoulou, A. Tiranov, C. B. Møller, Z. Liu, L. Midolo, N. Bart, A. Ludwig, P. Walther, C. J. v. Diepen, P. Lodahl, and A. S. Sørensen, Real- ization of waveguide many-body quantum optics, arXiv: 2605.18525 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    S. M. Corsetti, A. Hattori, E. R. Clements, F. W. Knoll- mann, M. Notaros, R. Swint, T. Sneh, P. T. Callahan, G. N. West, D. Kharas, T. Mahony, C. D. Bruzewicz, C. Sorace-Agaskar, R. McConnell, I. L. Chuang, J. Chi- averini, and J. Notaros, Integrated-photonics-based sys- tems for polarization-gradient cooling of trapped ions, Light: Science & Application...

    2026

  24. [24]

    Christen, T

    I. Christen, T. Propson, M. Sutula, H. Sattari, G. Choong, C. Panuski, A. Melville, J. Mallek, C. Brabec, S. Hamilton, P. B. Dixon, A. J. Menssen, D. Braje, A. H. Ghadimi, and D. Englund, An integrated photonic engine for programmable atomic control, Na- ture Communications16, 82 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    D. J. Blumenthal, A. Isichenko, and N. Chauhan, En- abling photonic integrated 3D magneto-optical traps for quantum sciences and applications, Optica Quantum2, 444 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Vetsch, D

    E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sagué, R. Schmidt, S. T. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Optical interface cre- atedbylaser-cooledatomstrappedintheevanescentfield surrounding an optical nanofiber, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 203603 (2010)

    2010

  27. [27]

    Goban, K

    A. Goban, K. S. Choi, D. J. Alton, D. Ding, C. Lacroûte, M. Pototschnig, T. Thiele, N. P. Stern, and H. J. Kim- ble, Demonstration of a state-insensitive, compensated nanofiber trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 033603 (2012)

    2012

  28. [28]

    Goban, C.-L

    A. Goban, C.-L. Hung, S.-P. Yu, J. Hood, J. Muniz, J. Lee, M. Martin, A. McClung, K. Choi, D. Chang, O. Painter, and H. Kimble, Atom–light interactions in photonic crystals, Nature Communications5, 3808 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    Painter, and H

    A.Goban, C.-L.Hung, J.D.Hood, S.-P.Yu, J.A.Muniz, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, Superradiance for atoms trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 063601 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    H. L. Sørensen, J.-B. Béguin, K. W. Kluge, I. Iakoupov, A. S. Sørensen, J. H. Müller, E. S. Polzik, and J. Ap- pel, Coherent backscattering of light off one-dimensional atomic strings, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 133604 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    N. V. Corzo, B. Gouraud, A. Chandra, A. Goban, A. S. Sheremet, D. V. Kupriyanov, and J. Laurat, Large bragg reflection from one-dimensional chains of trapped atoms nearananoscalewaveguide,Phys.Rev.Lett.117,133603 (2016)

    2016

  32. [32]

    J. D. Thompson, T. G. Tiecke, N. P. de Leon, J. Feist, A. V. Akimov, M. Gullans, A. S. Zibrov, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Coupling a single trapped atom to a nanoscale optical cavity, Science340, 1202 (2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    T. G. Tiecke, J. D. Thompson, N. P. de Leon, L. R. Liu, V.Vuletić,andM.D.Lukin,Nanophotonicquantum phase switch with a single atom, Nature508, 241 (2014)

    2014

  34. [34]

    Ðorđević, P

    T. Ðorđević, P. Samutpraphoot, P. L. Ocola, H. Bernien, B. Grinkemeyer, I. Dimitrova, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Entanglement transport and a nanophotonic in- terface for atoms in optical tweezers, Science373, 1511 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    X. Zhou, H. Tamura, T.-H. Chang, and C.-L. Hung, Cou- pling single atoms to a nanophotonic whispering-gallery- mode resonator via optical guiding, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 103601 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    X. Zhou, H. Tamura, T.-H. Chang, and C.-L. Hung, Trapped atoms and superradiance on an integrated 7 nanophotonic microring circuit, Phys. Rev. X14, 031004 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    X. Zhou, D. A. Suresh, F. Robicheaux, and C.-L. Hung, Selective collective emission from a dense atomic ensem- blecoupledtoananophotonicresonator,Phys.Rev.Lett. 135, 113601 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    S. G. Menon, N. Glachman, M. Pompili, A. Dibos, and H. Bernien, An integrated atom array-nanophotonic chip platform with background-free imaging, Nature Commu- nications15, 6156 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Hansen, F

    J. Hansen, F. Gargiulo, J. Mathiassen, J. Müller, E. Polzik, and J.-B. Béguin, Deterministic coupling of ultracold atomic lattice to a suspended photonic waveg- uide, arXiv:2511.18211 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Margalit, O

    Y. Margalit, O. Davidson, O. Zemer, Y. Michael, O. Bechler, D. Liran, N. Gross, D. Azoury, J. Raskop, Y. Yudkin, G. Guendelman, M. Katzman, M. Nagli, Y. Antman, N. Kandel, G. Arwas, I. Peer, O. Firsten- berg, and B. Dayan, Single-atom trapping in the evanescent field of an integrated photonic resonator, arXiv:2605.09532 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    S. Kuhr, W. Alt, D. Schrader, M. Müller, V. Gomer, and D. Meschede, Deterministic delivery of a single atom, Science293, 278 (2001)

    2001

  42. [42]

    S. Kuhr, W. Alt, D. Schrader, I. Dotsenko, Y. Mirosh- nychenko, W. Rosenfeld, M. Khudaverdyan, V. Gomer, A. Rauschenbeutel, and D. Meschede, Coherence proper- ties and quantum state transportation in an optical con- veyor belt, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 213002 (2003)

    2003

  43. [43]

    Nußmann, M

    S. Nußmann, M. Hijlkema, B. Weber, F. Rohde, G. Rempe, and A. Kuhn, Submicron positioning of sin- gle atoms in a microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 173602 (2005)

    2005

  44. [44]

    A. P. Burgers, L. S. Peng, J. A. Muniz, A. C. McClung, M. J. Martin, and H. J. Kimble, Clocked atom delivery to a photonic crystal waveguide, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences116, 456 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    M. E. Kim, T.-H. Chang, B. M. Fields, C.-A. Chen, and C.-L. Hung, Trapping single atoms on a nanophotonic circuit with configurable tweezer lattices, Nature Com- munications10, 1647 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Xu, L.-X

    L. Xu, L.-X. Wang, G.-J. Chen, Z.-B. Wang, X.-B. Xu, G.-C. Guo, C.-L. Zou, and G.-Y. Xiang, Dynamics of single atoms in optical tweezers near a chip’s surface, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 024002 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Vuletić, C

    V. Vuletić, C. Chin, A. J. Kerman, and S. Chu, Degen- erate raman sideband cooling of trapped cesium atoms at very high atomic densities, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5768 (1998)

    1998

  48. [48]

    T. Aoki, B. Dayan, E. Wilcut, W. P. Bowen, A. S. Parkins, T. J. Kippenberg, K. J. Vahala, and H. J. Kimble, Observation of strong coupling between one atom and a monolithic microresonator, Nature443, 671 (2006)

    2006

  49. [49]

    E. Will, L. Masters, A. Rauschenbeutel, M. Scheucher, and J. Volz, Coupling a single trapped atom to a whispering-gallery-mode microresonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 233602 (2021)

    2021

  50. [50]

    Takahata, J

    M. Takahata, J. Keloth, T. Yamamoto, K. ichi Harada, S. Miki, and T. Aoki, Fiber-optic quantum interface with an array of more than 100 individually addressable atoms on an optical nanofiber, arXiv: 2603.21812 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Piotrowski, C

    J. Piotrowski, C. Bach, N. V. Paz, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Limits of stable near-field probing in nanophotonic traps, arXiv: 2605.07798 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    H. J. Kimble, M. Dagenais, and L. Mandel, Photon anti- bunching in resonance fluorescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 691 (1977)

    1977

  53. [53]

    H. J. Carmichael, P. Drummond, P. Meystre, and D. F. Walls, Intensity correlations in resonance fluorescence with atomic number fluctuations, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General11, L121 (1978)

    1978

  54. [54]

    C.-L. Hung, S. M. Meenehan, D. E. Chang, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, Trapped atoms in one-dimensional photonic crystals, New Journal of Physics15, 083026 (2013)

    2013

  55. [55]

    Chang, B

    T.-H. Chang, B. M. Fields, M. E. Kim, and C.-L. Hung, Microring resonators on a suspended membrane circuit for atom–light interactions, Optica6, 1203 (2019). Acknowledgement We thank S. Bhave, T.-H. Chang, and Y. Tian for discussions on the photonic integrated circuits. We ac- knowledge Hikaru Tamura and Lyuhang Wu for the help on the initial stage of thi...

    work page doi:10.37807/gbmf13795 2019