pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07895 · v1 · pith:OGXU74ZBnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.RO

TBD-VLA: Temporal Block Diffusion Vision Language Action Model

Sung-Wook Lee , Xuhui Kang , Yen-Ling Kuo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.RO
keywords vision-language-actionblock diffusiontemporal modelingdiscrete diffusionrobot manipulationaction generationinference efficiencyautoregressive generation
0
0 comments X

The pith

TBD-VLA partitions action sequences into temporal blocks for masked discrete diffusion inside each block and autoregressive generation across blocks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces TBD-VLA, a discrete token-based vision-language-action framework that divides action sequences into temporal blocks. Inside each block it runs masked discrete diffusion to enable parallel decoding, while autoregressive generation links the blocks to preserve sequence order. This setup is presented as delivering both temporal coherence in trajectories and lower inference latency than standard next-token prediction. If the design holds, discrete VLA models could support faster robot control without losing the ability to model action dependencies over time. A reader would care because current approaches force a choice between slow sequential generation and fast but temporally weak parallel methods.

Core claim

TBD-VLA partitions action sequences into temporal blocks and performs masked discrete diffusion within each block while maintaining autoregressive generation across blocks. This design unifies temporal autoregression and parallel action decoding, achieving both strong temporal coherence and improved inference speed. The explicit temporal modeling enables asynchronous execution of action chunks via temporal in-painting. TBD-VLA significantly outperforms prior VLA approaches in both simulation and real-world manipulation tasks.

What carries the argument

Temporal block diffusion: action sequences are split into blocks so that masked discrete diffusion operates in parallel inside each block while autoregression connects blocks sequentially.

If this is right

  • The model outperforms prior VLA approaches in simulation and real-world manipulation tasks.
  • Explicit temporal modeling supports asynchronous execution of action chunks such as Real-Time Chunking.
  • The approach supplies a scalable route to fast yet temporally aware discrete VLA models.
  • Inference speed improves while temporal coherence in action trajectories is retained.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The block structure may let models update or replace only later action chunks when fresh sensor data arrives, without recomputing the full sequence.
  • Similar block-wise diffusion could be tested on other sequential generation problems that need both order and parallelism, such as video frame prediction.
  • Faster inference might allow discrete VLA policies to run on lower-power hardware while still handling multi-second action horizons.

Load-bearing premise

Splitting action sequences into temporal blocks and applying masked diffusion inside them while keeping autoregression between blocks will preserve token dependencies without introducing new modeling failures.

What would settle it

A head-to-head evaluation on the paper's simulation and real-world manipulation benchmarks in which TBD-VLA shows neither higher task success rates nor lower inference latency than standard autoregressive discrete VLA baselines would falsify the performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07895 by Sung-Wook Lee, Xuhui Kang, Yen-Ling Kuo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of Temporal Block Diffusion Vision Language Action (TBD-VLA) model. (A) TBD-VLA formulates action sequence generation as block discrete diffusion, which incorpo￾rates autoregression and discrete diffusion into a single framework. (B) At inference time, action tokens are decoded in parallel within blocks and autoregressively between blocks. KV caching for prefix further accelerates inference. (C) T… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Training for TBD-VLA. (A) In order to match the VLM backbone’s autoregressive property, we apply token shift, where the logits for the current action block are generated from the prior block. (B) A doubled-layout trick is used, in which clean and partially masked (corrupt) action blocks are processed in parallel under a custom attention mask. feature is discretized into Nb bins and tokenized using the shar… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Benchmarks and tasks. In simulation, TBD-VLA is evaluated across multiple robots: LIBERO and LIBERO-Plus using a Franka Panda robot arm, and SimplerEnv using the Google Robot and Widow-X arm. In real-world, three tabletop tasks are used to evaluate with a Franka Research 3 (FR3) arm. 4.3 Inference Decoding as Needed At inference time, we generate action blocks sequentially from fully masked tokens. Each de… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: LIBERO success rate with/without RTC vs. latency. Stars denote zero added latency. Notably, the policy performance for TBD-VLA with￾out RTC degrades to 72.3% under the same latency, showing the effectiveness of the asynchronous infer￾ence. Furthermore, TBD-VLA shows high robustness against various perturbation evaluations in LIBERO￾Plus, achieving 83.0% success rate on average. out￾performing the second be… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Real-world evaluation results. The average final success rate across three tasks are reported. The images represent examples of each perturbation type for “Everything in Bin” task. challenging real-world conditions, requiring long-horizon reasoning (“put every object on the table in the basket”), dexterity (“insert the bread into the toaster”), and reactiveness (“transfer the liquid”). Evaluation and Basel… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pre-training improves LIBERO-Plus robustness. LIBERO-Plus results compared be￾tween with and without pre-training across seven perturbation settings. C Real-World Evaluation C.1 Robot Setup Real-world experiments are conducted using a Franka Research 3 robot arm with two Intel Re￾alSense D435 RGB cameras. One camera provides a global third-person view, while the other provides an in-hand view. See [PITH_F… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real-World Experimental Setup. We use a Franka Research 3 robot with UMI grippers [46] for real-world manipulation. We control the gripper using width commands [47], which are needed for precise manipulation in the “Transfer the Liquid” task. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visualization of Real-world Task Progress. For each task, the task progress is visualized at uniform time intervals during data collection. C.2 Task Descriptions and Success Condition For real-world experiments, we evaluate TBD-VLA on the three following tabletop manipulation tasks: Everything in Bin. The robot must place all three animal-shaped dolls on the table into a basket. The initial object location… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative examples of real-world rollouts for both in-distribution and out-of￾distribution evaluations. We show the failure mode of TBD-VLA under camera viewpoint shift for the “Transfer the Liquid” task. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Discrete Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models typically formulate action generation as next-token prediction over discretized action spaces, conditioning each token autoregressively on prior context. While effective, this paradigm incurs high inference latency and largely ignores the temporal structure inherent in action trajectories. Recent efforts introduce parallel decoding to improve efficiency, enabling faster inference, but lack explicit mechanisms for modeling token dependencies. We introduce TBD-VLA, a discrete token-based VLA framework that incorporates block diffusion to enable temporal action generation. We partition action sequences into temporal blocks and perform masked discrete diffusion within each block, while maintaining autoregressive generation across blocks. This design unifies temporal autoregression and parallel action decoding, achieving both strong temporal coherence and improved inference speed. In addition, the explicit temporal modeling enables asynchronous execution of action chunks (e.g., Real-Time Chunking) via temporal in-painting. TBD-VLA significantly outperforms prior VLA approaches in both simulation and real-world manipulation tasks, offering a scalable path toward fast, temporally aware, discrete VLA models. Project webpage: https://tbd-vla.github.io/

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces TBD-VLA, a discrete VLA framework that partitions action sequences into temporal blocks, performs masked discrete diffusion within each block, and maintains autoregressive generation across blocks. This is claimed to unify temporal autoregression with parallel decoding for improved coherence and speed, while also enabling asynchronous execution via temporal in-painting. The abstract asserts that TBD-VLA significantly outperforms prior VLA approaches in both simulation and real-world manipulation tasks.

Significance. If the outperformance claims hold under rigorous evaluation, the block-diffusion design could offer a practical route to faster, temporally structured discrete VLA models, addressing a key tension between inference latency and action coherence in robotic control.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that TBD-VLA 'significantly outperforms prior VLA approaches' is unsupported by any metrics, baselines, ablation studies, error analysis, or experimental details, preventing any assessment of the empirical contribution.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the design claim that intra-block masked diffusion plus inter-block autoregression will produce both strong temporal coherence and improved speed without new dependency failures is presented without equations, diffusion schedule, or coherence analysis, leaving the weakest modeling assumption untested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for highlighting issues in the abstract. We agree that the abstract should better ground its claims and will revise it accordingly while preserving its concise nature. The full manuscript contains the supporting experiments, equations, and analyses referenced below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that TBD-VLA 'significantly outperforms prior VLA approaches' is unsupported by any metrics, baselines, ablation studies, error analysis, or experimental details, preventing any assessment of the empirical contribution.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract states the outperformance claim without quantitative details. The full manuscript (Sections 4 and 5) reports simulation and real-world results with metrics, baselines (including prior VLA models), ablations on block size and diffusion steps, and error analyses. To address the concern directly in the abstract, we will revise it to include key quantitative results (e.g., success rate improvements and latency reductions) and a brief reference to the evaluation protocol. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the design claim that intra-block masked diffusion plus inter-block autoregression will produce both strong temporal coherence and improved speed without new dependency failures is presented without equations, diffusion schedule, or coherence analysis, leaving the weakest modeling assumption untested.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the high-level design. The manuscript provides the full formulation in Section 3, including the masked discrete diffusion objective within blocks, the autoregressive conditioning across blocks, the diffusion schedule, and analysis of temporal coherence via dependency modeling. Experiments in Section 4 validate the coherence and speed claims through ablations. We will revise the abstract to more explicitly note that these elements are formalized and tested in the paper, without adding equations to the abstract itself. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper is an architectural proposal for TBD-VLA that partitions action sequences into temporal blocks, applies masked discrete diffusion intra-block, and autoregression inter-block. No equations, parameter-fitting steps, predictions, or self-citations appear in the provided text. Claims of unification and outperformance are presented as design consequences and empirical results rather than derivations that reduce to their own inputs by construction. The central description is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract contains no mathematical derivations, fitted constants, or new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5723 in / 1009 out tokens · 18115 ms · 2026-06-27T21:47:49.343950+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Black, N

    K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. R. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, M. Y . Galliker, D. Ghosh, L. Groom, K. Hausman, b. ichter, S. Jakubczak, T. Jones, L. Ke, D. LeBlanc, S. Levine, A. Li-Bell, M. Mothukuri, S. Nair, K. Pertsch, A. Z. Ren, L. X. Shi, L. Smith, J. T. Springenberg, K. Stachowicz, J. Tanner, Q. Vuong, H. Walke...

  2. [2]

    URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v305/black25a

    PMLR, 27–30 Sep 2025. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v305/black25a. html

    2025

  3. [3]

    Bjorck, N

    NVIDIA, J. Bjorck, N. C. Fernando Casta ˜neda, X. Da, R. Ding, L. J. Fan, Y . Fang, D. Fox, F. Hu, S. Huang, J. Jang, Z. Jiang, J. Kautz, K. Kundalia, L. Lao, Z. Li, Z. Lin, K. Lin, G. Liu, E. Llontop, L. Magne, A. Mandlekar, A. Narayan, S. Nasiriany, S. Reed, Y . L. Tan, G. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Q. Wang, J. Xiang, Y . Xie, Y . Xu, Z. Xu, S. Ye, Z. Yu, ...

    2025

  4. [4]

    Pertsch, K

    K. Pertsch, K. Stachowicz, B. Ichter, D. Driess, S. Nair, Q. Vuong, O. Mees, C. Finn, and S. Levine. FAST: Efficient action tokenization for vision-language-action models. InRobotics: Science and Systems, 2025. URLhttps://roboticsconference.org/program/papers/ 12/

    2025

  5. [5]

    Y . Wang, H. Zhu, M. Liu, J. Yang, H.-S. Fang, and T. He. VQ-VLA: Improving vision- language-action models via scaling vector-quantized action tokenizers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 11089–11099, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    C. Liu, X. Han, J. Gao, Y . Zhao, H. Chen, and Y . Du. OAT: Ordered action tokenization. In Robotics: Science and Systems, 2026. URLhttps://github.com/Chaoqi-LIU/oat

    2026

  7. [7]

    M. J. Kim, C. Finn, and P. Liang. Fine-tuning vision-language-action models: Opti- mizing speed and success. InRobotics: Science and Systems, 2025. URLhttps:// roboticsconference.org/program/papers/22/

    2025

  8. [8]

    Liang, Y

    Z. Liang, Y . Li, T. Yang, C. Wu, S. Mao, L. Pei, X. Yang, J. Pang, Y . Mu, and P. Luo. Discrete diffusion VLA: Bringing discrete diffusion to action decoding in vision-language-action poli- cies. InThe F ourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2026. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=YWeNCMxdhM

    2026

  9. [9]

    Arriola, A

    M. Arriola, A. Gokaslan, J. Chiu, Z. Yang, Z. Qi, J. Han, S. Sahoo, and V . Kuleshov. Block dif- fusion: Interpolating between autoregressive and diffusion language models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2025, pages 50726–50753, 2025

    2025

  10. [10]

    C. Wu, H. Zhang, S. Xue, S. Diao, Y . Fu, Z. Liu, P. Molchanov, P. Luo, S. Han, and E. Xie. Fast-dLLM v2: Efficient block-diffusion LLM. InThe F ourteenth International Con- ference on Learning Representations, 2026. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id= 1NZ3DHF9nT

    2026

  11. [11]

    Black, M

    K. Black, M. Y . Galliker, and S. Levine. Real-time execution of action chunking flow policies. InThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2026. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=UkR2zO5uww

    2026

  12. [12]

    Sohl-Dickstein, E

    J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, and S. Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In F. Bach and D. Blei, editors,Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 37 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2256–2265, Lille, France, 07–09 Jul 2015. PMLR. URLhttps: //procee...

    2015

  13. [13]

    S. Nie, F. Zhu, Z. You, X. Zhang, J. Ou, J. Hu, J. Zhou, Y . Lin, J.-R. Wen, and C. Li. Large language diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38:50608– 50646, 2026

    2026

  14. [14]

    S. S. Sahoo, M. Arriola, Y . Schiff, A. Gokaslan, E. Marroquin, J. T. Chiu, A. Rush, and V . Kuleshov. Simple and effective masked diffusion language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:130136–130184, 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    Swerdlow, M

    A. Swerdlow, M. Prabhudesai, S. Gandhi, D. Pathak, and K. Fragkiadaki. Unified multimodal discrete diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20853, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    L. Yang, Y . Tian, B. Li, X. Zhang, K. Shen, Y . Tong, and M. Wang. Mmada: Multimodal large diffusion language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38: 138867–138907, 2026

    2026

  17. [17]

    M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. P. Foster, P. R. Sanketi, Q. Vuong, T. Kollar, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, D. Sadigh, S. Levine, P. Liang, and C. Finn. OpenVLA: An open-source vision-language-action model. In P. Agrawal, O. Kroe- mer, and W. Burgard, editors,Proceedings of The 8th Conference on Robot L...

  18. [18]

    URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v270/kim25c.html

  19. [19]

    W. Song, J. Chen, S. Chen, J. Wang, P. Ding, H. Zhao, Y . Qin, X. Zheng, D. Wang, Y . Wang, et al. Fast-dvla: Accelerating discrete diffusion vla to real-time performance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.25661, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    J. Chen, W. Song, P. Ding, Z. Zhou, H. Zhao, F. Tang, D. Wang, and H. Li. Unified diffusion VLA: Vision-language-action model via joint discrete denoising diffusion process. InThe F ourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2026. URLhttps:// openreview.net/forum?id=a4487c0ccbdde853b9fe256554903e70db5f15e2

    2026

  21. [21]

    Y . Wen, H. Li, K. Gu, Y . Zhao, T. Wang, and X. Sun. LLaDA-VLA: Vision language diffusion action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06932, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Shukor, D

    M. Shukor, D. Aubakirova, F. Capuano, P. Kooijmans, S. Palma, A. Zouitine, M. Aractingi, C. Pascal, M. Russi, A. Marafioti, et al. Smolvla: A vision-language-action model for afford- able and efficient robotics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01844, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    J. Lee, J. Duan, H. Fang, Y . Deng, S. Liu, B. Li, B. Fang, J. Zhang, Y . R. Wang, S. Lee, et al. Molmoact: Action reasoning models that can reason in space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07917, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Goyal, H

    A. Goyal, H. Hadfield, X. Yang, V . Blukis, and F. Ramos. Vla-0: Building state-of-the-art vlas with zero modification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13054, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    S. Bai, Y . Cai, R. Chen, K. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Cheng, L. Deng, W. Ding, C. Gao, C. Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    B. Liu, Y . Zhu, C. Gao, Y . Feng, Q. Liu, Y . Zhu, and P. Stone. LIBERO: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 36, pages 44776–44791, 2023. URLhttps://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/ 8c3c666820ea055a77726d66fc7d447f-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html

    2023

  27. [27]

    S. Fei, S. Wang, J. Shi, Z. Dai, J. Cai, P. Qian, L. Ji, X. He, S. Zhang, Z. Fei, J. Fu, J. Gong, and X. Qiu. LIBERO-Plus: In-depth robustness analysis of vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13626, 2025. 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    X. Li, K. Hsu, J. Gu, O. Mees, K. Pertsch, H. R. Walke, C. Fu, I. Lunawat, I. Sieh, S. Kir- mani, S. Levine, J. Wu, C. Finn, H. Su, Q. Vuong, and T. Xiao. Evaluating real-world robot manipulation policies in simulation. In P. Agrawal, O. Kroemer, and W. Burgard, editors,Proceedings of The 8th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 270 ofProceed- ings of Mac...

    2025

  29. [29]

    Y . Wang, X. Li, W. Wang, J. Zhang, Y . Li, Y . Chen, X. Wang, and Z. Zhang. Unified vision- language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19850, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Khazatsky, K

    A. Khazatsky, K. Pertsch, S. Nair, A. Balakrishna, S. Dasari, S. Karamcheti, S. Nasiriany, M. K. Srirama, L. Y . Chen, K. Ellis, P. D. Fagan, J. Hejna, M. Itkina, M. Lepert, Y . J. Ma, P. T. Miller, J. Wu, S. Belkhale, S. Dass, H. Ha, A. Jain, A. Lee, Y . Lee, M. Memmel, S. Park, I. Radosavovic, K. Wang, A. Zhan, K. Black, C. Chi, K. B. Hatch, S. Lin, J. ...

    2024

  31. [31]

    O’Neill, A

    A. O’Neill, A. Rehman, A. Maddukuri, A. Gupta, A. Padalkar, A. Lee, A. Pooley, A. Gupta, A. Mandlekar, A. Jain, et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and RT-X models. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 6892–6903. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  32. [32]

    Kumar, R

    V . Kumar, R. Shah, G. Zhou, V . Moens, V . Caggiano, A. Gupta, and A. Ra- jeswaran. RoboHive: A unified framework for robot learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 36, pages 44323–44340,

  33. [33]

    URLhttps://papers.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/ 8a84a4341c375b8441b36836bb343d4e-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html

    2023

  34. [34]

    K. Wu, C. Hou, J. Liu, Z. Che, X. Ju, Z. Yang, M. Li, Y . Zhao, Z. Xu, G. Yang, et al. RoboMIND: Benchmark on multi-embodiment intelligence normative data for robot manip- ulation. InRobotics: Science and Systems, 2025. URLhttps://roboticsconference. org/program/papers/152/

    2025

  35. [35]

    H.-S. Fang, H. Fang, Z. Tang, J. Liu, C. Wang, J. Wang, H. Zhu, and C. Lu. RH20T: A com- prehensive robotic dataset for learning diverse skills in one-shot. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2024. URLhttps://rh20t.github.io/

    2024

  36. [36]

    H. R. Walke, K. Black, T. Z. Zhao, Q. Vuong, C. Zheng, P. Hansen-Estruch, A. W. He, V . Myers, M. J. Kim, M. Du, A. Lee, K. Fang, C. Finn, and S. Levine. BridgeData v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale. In J. Tan, M. Toussaint, and K. Darvish, ed- itors,Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229 ofProceedings of Machine Learning ...

    2023

  37. [37]

    Brohan, N

    A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, Y . Chebotar, J. Dabis, C. Finn, K. Gopalakrishnan, K. Haus- man, A. Herzog, J. Hsu, J. Ibarz, B. Ichter, A. Irpan, T. Jackson, S. Jesmonth, N. J. Joshi, R. Julian, D. Kalashnikov, Y . Kuang, I. Leal, K.-H. Lee, S. Levine, Y . Lu, U. Malla, D. Manju- nath, I. Mordatch, O. Nachum, C. Parada, J. Peralta, E. Perez, K. Pertsc...

    2023

  38. [38]

    Ghosh, H

    D. Ghosh, H. R. Walke, K. Pertsch, K. Black, O. Mees, S. Dasari, J. Hejna, T. Kreiman, C. Xu, J. Luo, Y . L. Tan, L. Y . Chen, Q. Vuong, T. Xiao, P. R. Sanketi, D. Sadigh, C. Finn, and S. Levine. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy. InRobotics: Science and Systems,

  39. [39]

    URLhttps://www.roboticsproceedings.org/ rss20/p090.pdf

    doi:10.15607/RSS.2024.XX.090. URLhttps://www.roboticsproceedings.org/ rss20/p090.pdf

    work page doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.090 2024

  40. [40]

    D. Qu, H. Song, Q. Chen, Y . Yao, X. Ye, J. Gu, Z. Wang, Y . Ding, B. Zhao, D. Wang, and X. Li. SpatialVLA: Exploring spatial representations for visual-language-action models. In Robotics: Science and Systems, 2025. doi:10.15607/RSS.2025.XXI.011. URLhttps://www. roboticsproceedings.org/rss21/p011.pdf

    work page doi:10.15607/rss.2025.xxi.011 2025

  41. [41]

    Black, N

    K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, L. Groom, K. Haus- man, B. Ichter, S. Jakubczak, T. Jones, L. Ke, S. Levine, A. Li-Bell, M. Mothukuri, S. Nair, K. Pertsch, L. X. Shi, J. Tanner, Q. Vuong, A. Walling, H. Wang, and U. Zhilinsky.π 0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    X. Chen, Y . Chen, Y . Fu, N. Gao, J. Jia, W. Jin, H. Li, Y . Mu, J. Pang, Y . Qiao, Y . Tian, B. Wang, B. Wang, F. Wang, H. Wang, T. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Wei, C. Wu, S. Yang, J. Ye, J. Yu, J. Zeng, J. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Zhang, F. Zheng, B. Zhou, and Y . Zhu. Internvla-m1: A spatially guided vision-language-action framework for generalist robot policy.arXiv...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Cadene, S

    R. Cadene, S. Alibert, A. Soare, Q. Gallouedec, A. Zouitine, S. Palma, P. Kooijmans, M. Ar- actingi, M. Shukor, D. Aubakirova, M. Russi, F. Capuano, C. Pascal, J. Choghari, J. Moss, and T. Wolf. Lerobot: State-of-the-art machine learning for real-world robotics in pytorch. https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot, 2024

    2024

  44. [44]

    E. Jang, A. Irpan, M. Khansari, D. Kappler, F. Ebert, C. Lynch, S. Levine, and C. Finn. BC-z: Zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning. In5th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2021. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=8kbp23tSGYv

    2021

  45. [45]

    R. Shah, R. Mart ´ın-Mart´ın, and Y . Zhu. Mutex: Learning unified policies from multimodal task specifications. In7th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2023. URLhttps:// openreview.net/forum?id=PwqiqaaEzJ

    2023

  46. [46]

    Belkhale, Y

    S. Belkhale, Y . Cui, and D. Sadigh. Hydra: Hybrid robot actions for imitation learning. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2023

    2023

  47. [47]

    Nasiriany, T

    S. Nasiriany, T. Gao, A. Mandlekar, and Y . Zhu. Learning and retrieval from prior data for skill-based imitation learning. InConference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2022

    2022

  48. [48]

    G. Zhou, V . Dean, M. K. Srirama, A. Rajeswaran, J. Pari, K. Hatch, A. Jain, T. Yu, P. Abbeel, L. Pinto, C. Finn, and A. Gupta. Train offline, test online: A real robot learning benchmark. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2023

    2023

  49. [49]

    L. Y . Chen, S. Adebola, and K. Goldberg. Berkeley UR5 demonstration dataset.https: //sites.google.com/view/berkeley-ur5/home

  50. [50]

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, C. Pan, E. Cousineau, B. Burchfiel, S. Feng, R. Tedrake, and S. Song. Universal manipulation interface: In-the-wild robot teaching without in-the-wild robots. InProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2024

    2024

  51. [51]

    X. Kang, T. Tian, S.-W. Lee, B. Huang, Y . Li, and Y .-L. Kuo. Learning force-regulated ma- nipulation with a low-cost tactile-force-controlled gripper.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10013, 2026. 13 A Training Details We use the LeRobot framework [39] for TBD-VLA training and policy deployment. This provides a unified pipeline for dataset loading, pre-processi...

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Transfer the Liquid

    for real-world manipulation. We control the gripper using width commands [47], which are needed for precise manipulation in the “Transfer the Liquid” task. 17 Figure 8:Visualization of Real-world Task Progress.For each task, the task progress is visualized at uniform time intervals during data collection. C.2 Task Descriptions and Success Condition For re...