pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07952 · v1 · pith:3OCGASQMnew · submitted 2026-06-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech

Translationally Covariant Modulated Symmetries: Classification and Goldstone

Bo-Ting Chen , Zihan Zhou , Biao Lian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech
keywords modulated symmetrytranslationally covariantGoldstone modesspontaneous symmetry breakingAbelian symmetryJordan normal formcondensed matterdipole symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Abelian translationally covariant modulated symmetries consist only of multipole, exponential and harmonic components, which produce distinct Goldstone modes when broken.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Modulated symmetries carry a spatially dependent unit of charge. The paper defines those compatible with translationally symmetric Hamiltonians as translationally covariant modulated symmetries, or TCMS. For Abelian TCMS it proves that the charge unit decomposes exclusively into multipole, exponential and harmonic pieces. All one-dimensional cases are classified by real Jordan normal form blocks. The derived Goldstone action then shows that each piece, when spontaneously broken, yields a different pattern of gapless modes or none at all.

Core claim

For Abelian TCMSs, their units of charge can only contain multipole, exponential and harmonic components. We classify all the one-dimensional TCMSs by real Jordan normal form blocks. We further derive the generic Goldstone action for SSB phases of continuous TCMSs, by which we show that a broken multipole symmetry gives higher-order gapless Goldstone modes, a broken harmonic symmetry gives gapless Goldstone modes at finite momenta, and a broken exponential symmetry gives no gapless Goldstone modes, modifying the conventional Goldstone theorem.

What carries the argument

The decomposition of the charge unit of a translationally covariant modulated symmetry (TCMS) into multipole, exponential and harmonic components, classified in one dimension by real Jordan normal form blocks.

If this is right

  • A broken multipole symmetry produces higher-order gapless Goldstone modes.
  • A broken harmonic symmetry produces gapless Goldstone modes at finite momenta.
  • A broken exponential symmetry produces no gapless Goldstone modes.
  • All one-dimensional Abelian TCMSs are classified by real Jordan normal form blocks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The standard Goldstone theorem applies only when the symmetry is not modulated and must be adjusted for TCMS.
  • Physical systems dominated by exponential modulated symmetries may show no low-energy gapless modes even after symmetry breaking.
  • The component classification may extend to higher spatial dimensions with analogous restrictions on allowed charge units.
  • The framework connects to existing work on dipole and multipole conserving phases in condensed matter.

Load-bearing premise

The generic condition that defines a modulated symmetry as translationally covariant correctly identifies all symmetries compatible with translationally symmetric Hamiltonians.

What would settle it

Observation in one dimension of an Abelian modulated symmetry compatible with a translationally invariant Hamiltonian whose charge unit contains a component outside the multipole, exponential and harmonic families.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07952 by Biao Lian, Bo-Ting Chen, Zihan Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a)-(c): Mean-field phase diagram of deformed Bose [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic dispersions of the Nambu-Goldstone modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Modulated symmetries are global symmetries with a spatially dependent unit of charge, such as the dipole symmetry and the exponential symmetry. We give the generic condition for a modulated symmetry to be compatible with translationally symmetric Hamiltonians, which we define as a translationally covariant modulated symmetry (TCMS). For Abelian TCMSs, we prove that their units of charge can only contain multipole, exponential and harmonic components. Particularly, we classify all the one-dimensional TCMSs by real Jordan normal form blocks. We further derive the generic Goldstone action for SSB phases of continuous TCMSs, by which we show that a broken multipole symmetry gives higher-order gapless Goldstone modes, a broken harmonic symmetry gives gapless Goldstone modes at finite momenta, and a broken exponential symmetry gives no gapless Goldstone modes, modifying the conventional Goldstone theorem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript defines translationally covariant modulated symmetries (TCMS) as modulated symmetries compatible with translationally symmetric Hamiltonians. For Abelian TCMSs it proves that charge units contain only multipole, exponential and harmonic components, classifies all one-dimensional cases via real Jordan normal form blocks, and derives the generic Goldstone action for continuous TCMS spontaneous symmetry breaking, yielding higher-order gapless modes for broken multipole symmetries, finite-momentum gapless modes for broken harmonic symmetries, and no gapless modes for broken exponential symmetries.

Significance. If the classification and Goldstone-action derivation hold, the work supplies a systematic mathematical framework for modulated symmetries that extends the conventional Goldstone theorem in a controlled way. The explicit use of Jordan blocks for the one-dimensional classification is a clear technical strength that renders the result falsifiable and reproducible.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (definition of TCMS): the generic compatibility condition is adopted as the axiomatic starting point for the entire classification and Goldstone analysis; an explicit derivation showing necessity and sufficiency for translationally invariant Hamiltonians is required, because this condition is load-bearing for the claim that only multipole/exponential/harmonic components appear.
  2. [§3] §3 (Jordan-block classification): the proof that Abelian TCMS units of charge are exhausted by the three listed components rests on the real Jordan form analysis; the manuscript should state the precise assumptions on the representation (e.g., finite-dimensionality, reality of the blocks) under which the exhaustion holds, as any relaxation would affect the completeness statement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a single illustrative example (e.g., the dipole symmetry) showing how the TCMS condition is verified before the general classification is presented.
  2. Notation for the charge-unit operators and the translation operator should be unified across sections; currently the same symbol appears with slightly different meanings in the classification and Goldstone-action parts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (definition of TCMS): the generic compatibility condition is adopted as the axiomatic starting point for the entire classification and Goldstone analysis; an explicit derivation showing necessity and sufficiency for translationally invariant Hamiltonians is required, because this condition is load-bearing for the claim that only multipole/exponential/harmonic components appear.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of necessity and sufficiency strengthens the foundation. In the revised manuscript we will expand §2 with a dedicated derivation: starting from a modulated symmetry operator U and a translationally invariant Hamiltonian H, we show that [U,H]=0 for all such H if and only if the compatibility condition on the charge unit holds. The argument uses the translation operator T and the requirement that the commutator vanishes identically under lattice translations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (Jordan-block classification): the proof that Abelian TCMS units of charge are exhausted by the three listed components rests on the real Jordan form analysis; the manuscript should state the precise assumptions on the representation (e.g., finite-dimensionality, reality of the blocks) under which the exhaustion holds, as any relaxation would affect the completeness statement.

    Authors: We will add an explicit statement of assumptions at the opening of §3. The classification assumes a finite-dimensional real vector space on which the translation operator acts via a real matrix; the real Jordan canonical form is then applied to this matrix. Under these conditions (standard for lattice models with finitely many charge degrees of freedom per cell), the possible charge units are exhausted by the multipole, exponential, and harmonic blocks. We will note that infinite-dimensional or complex representations lie outside the present scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper defines TCMS via a compatibility condition with translationally symmetric Hamiltonians and then classifies Abelian cases using the real Jordan normal form of the associated linear operators. This is a direct mathematical consequence of the definition and standard linear algebra, with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction, no fitted parameters relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems visible. The Goldstone action derivation follows from the classified symmetries without circular steps. The analysis is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard mathematical structures (real Jordan normal form, group representation theory) and the physical assumption that the Hamiltonian is translationally invariant; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Real Jordan normal form classifies all linear operators on real vector spaces up to similarity.
    Invoked for the 1D Abelian TCMS classification.
  • domain assumption A modulated symmetry is compatible with a translationally symmetric Hamiltonian only when its charge unit satisfies a covariance condition under translations.
    This is the defining premise for TCMS and the starting point of the classification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5685 in / 1370 out tokens · 16954 ms · 2026-06-27T19:28:43.945800+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We set U >0in general, andU′>0only in the dipole symmetry Hamiltonian to ensure it is lower bounded

    and harmonic symmetry [48], respectively, in which V(ˆnj) = U 2 ˆnj(ˆnj−1)+U′ 6 ˆnj(ˆnj−1)(ˆnj−2)−µˆnj. We set U >0in general, andU′>0only in the dipole symmetry Hamiltonian to ensure it is lower bounded. The modu- lated symmetry charges in Eq. (3) are reduced to lattice sitesx 1 =j∈Z, as shown in Tab. I, where the struc- ture constant matrix isA1 =J R 2 ...

  2. [2]

    Without loss of generality, we assume the ground state|Ω⟩has zero energy and zero momentum. Con- sider the spectral decomposition by inserting a complete set of energy-momentum eigenbasis{|n,k⟩}satisfying H|n,k⟩=En(k)|n,k⟩andˆPµ|n,k⟩=kµ|n,k⟩, with en- ergyE n(k)≥0and momentumk= (k 1,···,kd). It suffices to consider the charged local operator (order pa- ra...

  3. [3]

    Nambu, Axial vector current conservation in weak in- teractions, Phys

    Y. Nambu, Axial vector current conservation in weak in- teractions, Phys. Rev. Lett.4, 380 (1960)

    1960

  4. [4]

    Goldstone, Field theories with «superconductor »solu- tions, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)19, 154 (1961)

    J. Goldstone, Field theories with «superconductor »solu- tions, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)19, 154 (1961)

    1955

  5. [6]

    Hidaka, Counting rule for nambu-goldstone modes in nonrelativistic systems, Physical Review Letters110, 10.1103/physrevlett.110.091601 (2013)

    Y. Hidaka, Counting rule for nambu-goldstone modes in nonrelativistic systems, Physical Review Letters110, 10.1103/physrevlett.110.091601 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.091601 2013

  6. [7]

    Watanabe and H

    H. Watanabe and H. Murayama, Redundancies in nambu-goldstone bosons, Physical Review Letters110, 10.1103/physrevlett.110.181601 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.181601 2013

  7. [8]

    Hidaka, T

    Y. Hidaka, T. Noumi, and G. Shiu, Effective field theory for spacetime symmetry breaking, Physical Review D92, 10.1103/physrevd.92.045020 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.045020 2015

  8. [9]

    H.Watanabe,Countingrulesofnambu–goldstonemodes, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 169–187 (2020)

    2020

  9. [10]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics2015, 10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 2015

  10. [11]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, Categorical symmetry and non- invertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topolog- ical phase transitions, Physical Review Research2, 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033417 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033417 2020

  11. [12]

    Chatterjee, W

    A. Chatterjee, W. Ji, and X.-G. Wen, Emergent gener- 7 alized symmetry and maximal symmetry topological or- der, Phys. Rev. B112, 115142 (2025), arXiv:2212.14432 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  12. [13]

    McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed mat- ter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 57–82 (2023)

    J. McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed mat- ter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 57–82 (2023)

    2023

  13. [14]

    Cordova, T

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao, Snowmass white paper: Generalized sym- metries in quantum field theory and beyond (2022), arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [15]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, Lectures on generalized symmetries (2023), arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [16]

    Schafer-Nameki, Ictp lectures on (non-)invertible gen- eralized symmetries (2023), arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

    S. Schafer-Nameki, Ictp lectures on (non-)invertible gen- eralized symmetries (2023), arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [17]

    P. Sala, J. Lehmann, T. Rakovszky, and F. Pollmann, Dynamics in systems with modulated symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 170601 (2022)

    2022

  17. [18]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, Global dipole symmetry, compact lifshitz theory, ten- sor gauge theory, and fractons, Physical Review B106, 10.1103/physrevb.106.045112 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.045112 2022

  18. [19]

    Delfino, C

    G. Delfino, C. Chamon, and Y. You, Topological or- der and Fractons from Gauging Exponential Symmetries, (2023), arXiv:2306.17121 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2023

  19. [20]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, A modified villain formulation of fractons and other exotic theories, Journal of Mathematical Physics62, 10.1063/5.0060808 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0060808 2021

  20. [21]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, ExoticZn symmetries, dual- ity, and fractons in 3+1-dimensional quantum field the- ory, SciPost Physics10, 10.21468/scipostphys.10.1.003 (2021)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.10.1.003 2021

  21. [22]

    K. T. Grosvenor, C. Hoyos, F. Peña-Benitez, and P. Surówka, Space-dependent symmetries and fractons (2021), arXiv:2112.00531 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  22. [23]

    Hirono, M

    Y. Hirono, M. You, S. Angus, and G. Y. Cho, A sym- metry principle for gauge theories with fractons, SciPost Physics16, 10.21468/scipostphys.16.2.050 (2024)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.16.2.050 2024

  23. [24]

    J. H. Han, E. Lake, H. T. Lam, R. Verresen, and Y. You, Topological quantum chains protected by dipolar and other modulated symmetries, Phys. Rev. B109, 125121 (2024), arXiv:2309.10036 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2024

  24. [25]

    H. T. Lam, Classification of dipolar symmetry-protected topological phases: Matrix product states, stabilizer hamiltonians,andfinitetensorgaugetheories,Phys.Rev. B109, 115142 (2024)

    2024

  25. [26]

    Saito, W

    T. Saito, W. Cao, B. Han, and H. Ebisu, Matrix product state classification of one-dimensional multipole symmetry-protected topological phases, Physical Review B112, 10.1103/6txg-7hy7 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/6txg-7hy7 2025

  26. [27]

    J. Kim, Y. You, and J. H. Han, Noninvertible sym- metry and topological holography for modulated spt in one dimension, SciPost Physics19, 10.21468/scipost- phys.19.4.110 (2025)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipost- 2025

  27. [28]

    Yao, Lattice Translation Modulated Symmetries and TFTs, (2025), arXiv:2510.03889 [cond-mat.str-el]

    C.-Y. Yao, Lattice Translation Modulated Symmetries and TFTs, (2025), arXiv:2510.03889 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [29]

    S.-Q. Ning, H. Ebisu, and H. T. Lam, Matrix prod- uct states for modulated topological phases: Crystalline equivalence principle and lieb-schultz-mattis constraints (2026), arXiv:2603.19381 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [30]

    Anakru, S

    A. Anakru, S. Srinivasan, L. Li, and Z. Bi, Matrix prod- uct states for modulated symmetries: Spt, lsm, and be- yond (2026), arXiv:2603.19189 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [32]

    Nakamura, Z.-Y

    M. Nakamura, Z.-Y. Wang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Ex- actly Solvable Fermion Chain Describing aν= 1/3Frac- tional Quantum Hall State, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 016401 (2012), arXiv:1110.5033 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [33]

    Schulz, C

    M. Schulz, C. A. Hooley, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Stark many-body localization, Physical Review Letters 122, 10.1103/physrevlett.122.040606 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.040606 2019

  32. [34]

    J.-K. Yuan, S. A. Chen, and P. Ye, Fractonic super- fluids, Physical Review Research2, 10.1103/physrevre- search.2.023267 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevre- 2020

  33. [35]

    S. A. Chen, J.-K. Yuan, and P. Ye, Fractonic superfluids. ii. condensing subdimensional particles, Physical Review Research3, 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013226 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013226 2021

  34. [36]

    P.Sala,T.Rakovszky,R.Verresen,M.Knap,andF.Poll- mann, Ergodicity breaking arising from hilbert space fragmentation in dipole-conserving hamiltonians, Phys- ical Review X10, 10.1103/physrevx.10.011047 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.011047 2020

  35. [39]

    S. Pai, M. Pretko, and R. M. Nandkishore, Localiza- tion in fractonic random circuits, Physical Review X9, 10.1103/physrevx.9.021003 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.021003 2019

  36. [40]

    Lian, Quantum breakdown model: From many-body localization to chaos with scars, Physical Review B107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.115171 (2023)

    B. Lian, Quantum breakdown model: From many-body localization to chaos with scars, Physical Review B107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.115171 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.115171 2023

  37. [43]

    Hu and B

    Y.-M. Hu and B. Lian, Bosonic quantum breakdown hub- bard model, Phys. Rev. B112, L100504 (2025)

    2025

  38. [44]

    Hu and B

    Y.-M. Hu and B. Lian, From the quantum breakdown model to the lattice gauge theory, AAPPS Bulletin34, 10.1007/s43673-024-00128-4 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1007/s43673-024-00128-4 2024

  39. [45]

    Y.-M. Hu, Z. Han, and B. Lian, Quantum breakdown condensate as a disorder-free quantum glass (2025), arXiv:2512.21847 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [46]

    Surpassing the en- ergy resolution limit with ferromagnetic torque sensors,

    A. Gromov, Towards classification of fracton phases: The multipole algebra, Physical Review X9, 10.1103/phys- revx.9.031035 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2019

  41. [47]

    Stahl, E

    C. Stahl, E. Lake, and R. Nandkishore, Spontaneous breaking of multipole symmetries, Physical Review B 105, 10.1103/physrevb.105.155107 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.155107 2022

  42. [48]

    Lake,H.-Y

    E. Lake,H.-Y. Lee, J.H. Han, and T.Senthil,Dipole con- densates in tilted bose-hubbard chains, Physical Review B107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.195132 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.195132 2023

  43. [49]

    See Supplemental Material for details

  44. [50]

    P. Sala, Y. You, J. Hauschild, and O. Motrunich, Ex- otic quantum liquids in bose-hubbard models with spa- tially modulated symmetries, Physical Review B109, 10.1103/physrevb.109.014406 (2024). 8

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.014406 2024

  45. [51]

    Khudorozhkov, A

    A. Khudorozhkov, A. Tiwari, C. Chamon, and T. Neu- pert, Hilbert space fragmentation in a 2d quantum spin system with subsystem symmetries, SciPost Physics13, 10.21468/scipostphys.13.4.098 (2022)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.13.4.098 2022

  46. [52]

    Jezequel and P

    A. Srivastava and S. Dutta, Hierarchy of degener- ate stationary states in a boundary-driven dipole- conserving spin chain, SciPost Physics18, 10.21468/sci- postphys.18.3.111 (2025)

    work page doi:10.21468/sci- 2025

  47. [53]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromag- netism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  48. [54]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of long-range order in one and two dimensions, Phys. Rev.158, 383 (1967)

    1967

  49. [55]

    M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B40, 546 (1989)

    1989

  50. [56]

    S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1., Phys. Rev.177, 2239 (1969)

    1969

  51. [57]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zu- mino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2., Phys. Rev.177, 2247 (1969)

    1969

  52. [58]

    Brauner and H

    T. Brauner and H. Watanabe, Spontaneous breaking of spacetime symmetries and the inverse higgs effect, Phys- ical Review D89, 10.1103/physrevd.89.085004 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.085004 2014

  53. [59]

    E. A. Ivanov and V. I. Ogievetsky, The Inverse Higgs Phenomenon in Nonlinear Realizations, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 25, 164 (1975)

    1975

  54. [60]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza, and R. Rattazzi, Zool- ogy of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra- ordinary stuff, JHEP06, 155, arXiv:1501.03845 [hep-th]. 1 Supplemental Material I. THE BAKER-CAMPBELL-HAUSDORFF (BCH) FORMULA The Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff (BCH) formula is useful in deriving the equations in this paper: eABe−A=B+ [A,B] + 1 2![A...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv