pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08608 · v1 · pith:GXUWUJDInew · submitted 2026-06-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Divergent Coherent Phonon Responses Across the Metal-Insulator Crossover

Felix Hoff , Timo Veslin , Tim Bartsch , Carl-Friedrich Sch\"on , Dante M. Kennes , Matthias Wuttig This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords metavalent bondingcoherent phononsultrafast laser excitationmetal-insulator crossoverphonon softeningreflectance oscillationsPeierls instabilityGeTe
0
0 comments X

The pith

Materials with metavalent bonding show peak coherent phonon responses at the conductivity crossover between localized and delocalized states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures two ultrafast laser responses across many solids: how much phonons soften with increasing laser fluence and how much the amplitude of coherent reflectance oscillations grows with fluence. Only a small group of materials including Sb, GeTe, and Bi2Te3 produces large effects in both measures, and these effects reach their maximum in the narrow conductivity window of roughly 10^2 to 10^4 S/cm. The same materials display high dielectric constants, large Born effective charges, coordination numbers beyond the 8-N rule, and unusual bond breaking, which together point to a distinct bonding type called metavalent bonding. Frozen-phonon calculations trace the strong fluence dependence to structural instabilities that create anharmonic double-well potentials.

Core claim

A narrow class of materials employing metavalent bonding shows pronounced phonon softening and a giant increase in the amplitude of coherent reflectance oscillations with increasing laser fluence, with both response functions peaking in the conductivity range of 10^2 to 10^4 S/cm at the crossover between localized and delocalized electronic states. Frozen-phonon DFT calculations attribute the strong fluence dependence to Peierls-like instabilities leading to large deformation potentials and anharmonic double-well potentials.

What carries the argument

Metavalent bonding, a mechanism marked by high dielectric constants, enhanced Born effective charges, coordination numbers exceeding the 8-N rule, and uncommon bond rupture, together with Peierls-like instabilities that produce anharmonic double-well potentials.

If this is right

  • Materials in the intermediate conductivity regime can serve as targets for devices that use light to control phonons on ultrafast timescales.
  • The two measured response functions supply a practical test for ranking solids by their coherent phonon sensitivity.
  • Metavalent bonding supplies a concrete selection rule for finding additional materials with strong light-driven lattice responses.
  • The conductivity crossover marks the regime where deformation potentials become especially large due to structural instabilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same conductivity window may also optimize other light-induced structural changes such as rapid switching between crystalline phases.
  • Extending the comparison to additional compounds with borderline conductivity could map how sharply the response drops outside the crossover range.
  • If metavalent bonding is the key, then pressure or doping that shifts conductivity without changing the bonding type should move the response peak accordingly.

Load-bearing premise

The peak responses at the conductivity crossover are caused by metavalent bonding and the associated Peierls-like instabilities rather than by other shared traits of the chosen materials or by details of the measurement setup.

What would settle it

Observation of materials with metavalent bonding signatures that lack the pronounced fluence dependence, or materials lacking those signatures that nevertheless show the same peak responses in the 10^2-10^4 S/cm window.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08608 by Carl-Friedrich Sch\"on, Dante M. Kennes, Felix Hoff, Matthias Wuttig, Tim Bartsch, Timo Veslin.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Material Structure Dominant Phonon Sample type Conductivity (S/cm) Bonding Class Sb R-3m A1g Film 2.50E+04 Metavalent Bi R-3m A1g Film 7.70E+03 Metavalent BiTe P-3m1 A1g Film 3.67E+03 Metavalent Bi2Te P-3m1 A1g Film 1.00E+03 Metavalent Bi4Te3 R-3m A1g Film 8.00E+02 Metavalent Bi7Te3 R-3m A1g Film 1.00E+02 Metavalent Bi9Te10 R-3m A1g Film 3.70E+03 Metavalent Bi2Te3 R-3m A_1g^2 Film 6.60E+02 Metavalent Sb2Te… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultrafast laser control of material properties hinges on understanding light-matter interactions. We use two experimentally accessible response functions, laser fluence induced phonon softening and the amplitude of coherent reflectance oscillations, to compare how strongly different materials respond to ultrafast photoexcitation. Comparing a diverse set of materials, we find that only a narrow class, including Sb, GeTe, and Bi2Te3, shows exceptional responses such as pronounced phonon softening and a giant increase of reflectance oscillations with increasing fluence. These response functions peak in an intermediate conductivity regime of about 102 - 104 S/cm, at the crossover between localized and delocalized electronic states. The corresponding class of solids also shows other unconventional properties including high dielectric constants, enhanced Born effective charges, coordination numbers exceeding the 8-N rule and uncommon bond rupture. This suggests that these materials employ a unique bonding mechanism, coined metavalent bonding. Frozen-phonon DFT calculations show that the strong fluence dependence arises from Peierls-like instabilities, leading to large deformation potentials and anharmonic double-well potentials. These findings identify metavalent bonding as a design principle for enhanced coherent phonon control and provide a quantitative framework for identifying materials with exceptional ultrafast responses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript compares ultrafast coherent phonon responses across materials using two metrics—fluence-induced phonon softening and the amplitude of coherent reflectance oscillations—and reports that a narrow class (Sb, GeTe, Bi2Te3 and related compounds) exhibits exceptionally strong responses that peak in the intermediate conductivity window 10²–10⁴ S/cm at the metal-insulator crossover. These responses are attributed to metavalent bonding, supported by ancillary signatures (high dielectric constants, large Born charges, 8-N rule violations) and frozen-phonon DFT calculations that identify Peierls-like double-well potentials as the origin of large deformation potentials and anharmonic behavior. The work positions metavalent bonding as a design principle for enhanced coherent phonon control.

Significance. If the mechanistic attribution holds, the work supplies a practical, experimentally accessible framework for screening materials with strong ultrafast responses and identifies a bonding motif that correlates with pronounced light-matter coupling. The use of two independent response functions and the explicit link to DFT-derived potentials are positive features that could guide future material design in ultrafast optoelectronics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / material classification] Abstract and material-classification section: the claim that the peak responses are specifically due to metavalent bonding and associated Peierls instabilities is load-bearing, yet the manuscript classifies materials solely by room-temperature conductivity and lists ancillary signatures without reporting measurements on any control materials inside the same 10²–10⁴ S/cm window that lack high Born charges, large dielectric constants, or 8-N violations.
  2. [Frozen-phonon DFT calculations] Frozen-phonon DFT section: no quantitative mapping is provided from the experimentally accessed photoexcited carrier density to the DFT order parameter or deformation potential that would predict the observed fluence dependence of softening and oscillation amplitude; the connection therefore remains qualitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The bounds of the conductivity crossover window are stated as 10²–10⁴ S/cm; explicit justification for these limits and any uncertainty in the location of the observed peak would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Notation / figures] Notation for the two response functions (phonon softening and reflectance-oscillation amplitude) should be defined consistently in the main text and figure captions to avoid ambiguity when comparing across materials.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / material classification] Abstract and material-classification section: the claim that the peak responses are specifically due to metavalent bonding and associated Peierls instabilities is load-bearing, yet the manuscript classifies materials solely by room-temperature conductivity and lists ancillary signatures without reporting measurements on any control materials inside the same 10²–10⁴ S/cm window that lack high Born charges, large dielectric constants, or 8-N violations.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this observation. Our classification is based on conductivity at the metal-insulator crossover together with the established ancillary signatures of metavalent bonding (high dielectric constants, large Born charges, 8-N rule violations), and the manuscript does not include experimental data on control materials within the same conductivity window that lack these signatures. Such controls are not commonly available in the literature for this narrow regime. The argument therefore rests on the observed correlation across the studied metavalent compounds plus the supporting DFT results. We will revise the abstract and classification section to make the correlational nature of the evidence explicit and to note the absence of such controls as a limitation that could be addressed in future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Frozen-phonon DFT calculations] Frozen-phonon DFT section: no quantitative mapping is provided from the experimentally accessed photoexcited carrier density to the DFT order parameter or deformation potential that would predict the observed fluence dependence of softening and oscillation amplitude; the connection therefore remains qualitative.

    Authors: We agree that the link remains qualitative. The frozen-phonon calculations identify Peierls-like double-well potentials that produce large deformation potentials and anharmonicity, providing a mechanistic explanation for the observed strong fluence dependence, but no direct quantitative mapping from experimental carrier densities to the DFT order parameter is performed. Such a mapping would require non-equilibrium or carrier-doped DFT approaches that lie beyond the scope of the present study. We will revise the DFT section to state this limitation clearly and to outline possible directions for future quantitative modeling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper's chain proceeds from measured fluence-dependent phonon softening and reflectance amplitudes across a material set, through classification by room-temperature conductivity, to inference of metavalent bonding from ancillary signatures and to frozen-phonon DFT results on deformation potentials. None of these steps reduce by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-defined quantity, or a load-bearing self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The DFT calculations supply an independent mechanistic account of the observed fluence dependence rather than tautologically reproducing the input data. The absence of a control set is a limitation on causal attribution but does not constitute circularity in the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental identification of material class and DFT attribution to bonding and instabilities; limited details available from abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Frozen-phonon DFT calculations accurately capture fluence dependence arising from Peierls-like instabilities
    Invoked in abstract to explain strong fluence dependence in the identified materials.
invented entities (1)
  • metavalent bonding no independent evidence
    purpose: Unique bonding mechanism to explain high dielectric constants, enhanced Born charges, and coordination anomalies
    Coined in the paper based on observed properties in the narrow class of materials

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5766 in / 1272 out tokens · 28127 ms · 2026-06-27T18:03:27.057518+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Fritz, D.M., D.A. Reis, B. Adams, R.A. Akre, J. Arthur, C. Blome, P.H. Bucksbaum, A.L. Cavalieri, S. Engemann, S. Fahy, R.W. Falcone, P.H. Fuoss, K.J. Gaffney, M.J. George, J. Hajdu, M.P. Hertlein, P.B. Hillyard, M. Horn-von Hoegen, M. Kammler, J. Kaspar, R. Kienberger, P. Krejcik, S.H. Lee, A.M. Lindenberg, B. McFarland, D. Meyer, T. Montagne, E.D. Murra...

    2007

  2. [2]

    Shin, J.W

    Teitelbaum, S.W., T. Shin, J.W. Wolfson, Y. -H. Cheng, I.J.P. Molesky, M. Kandyla, and K.A. Nelson, Real-Time Observation of a Coher ent Lattice Transformation into a High- Symmetry Phase. Physical Review X, 2018. 8(3): p. 031081

    2018

  3. [3]

    Cantaluppi, D

    Mitrano, M., A. Cantaluppi, D. Nicoletti, S. Kaiser, A. Perucchi, S. Lupi, P. Di Pietro, D. Pontiroli, M. Riccò, S.R. Clark, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Possible light -induced superconductivity in K3C60 at high temperature. Nature, 2016. 530(7591): p. 461-464

    2016

  4. [4]

    Nyby, C.D

    Sie, E.J., C.M. Nyby, C.D. Pemmaraju, S.J. Park, X. Shen, J. Yang, M.C. Hoffmann, B.K. Ofori-Okai, R. Li, A.H. Reid, S. Weathersby, E. Mannebach, N . Finney, D. Rhodes, D. Chenet, A. Antony, L. Balicas, J. Hone, T.P. Devereaux, T.F. Heinz, X. Wang, and A.M. Lindenberg, An ultrafast symmetry switch in a Weyl semimetal. Nature, 2019. 565(7737): p. 61-66

    2019

  5. [5]

    Heide, H

    Shi, J., C. Heide, H. Xu, Y. Huang, Y. Shen, B. Guzelturk, M. Henstridge, C. Schön, A. Mangu, and Y. Kobayashi, Nonresonant Raman control of material phases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10131, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Vidal, H.J

    Cheng, T.K., J. Vidal, H.J. Zeiger, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus, and E.P. Ippen, Mechanism for displacive excitation of coherent phonons in Sb, Bi, Te, and Ti2O3. Applied Physics Letters,

  7. [7]

    1923-1925

    59(16): p. 1923-1925

    1923

  8. [8]

    Wegkamp, L

    Wall, S., D. Wegkamp, L. Foglia, K. Appavoo, J. Nag, R.F. Haglund, J. Stähler, and M. Wolf, Ultrafast changes in lattice symmetry probed by coherent phonons. Nature Communications,

  9. [9]

    Mariager, A

    Rettig, L., S.O. Mariager, A. Ferrer, S. Grübel, J.A. Johnson, J. Rittmann, T. Wolf, S.L. Johnson, G. Ingold, P. Beaud, and U. Staub, Ultrafast Structural Dynamics of the Fe -Pnictide Par ent Compound ${\mathrm{BaFe}}_{2}{\mathrm{As}}_{2}$. Physical Review Letters, 2015. 114(6): p. 067402

    2015

  10. [10]

    Hallett, B.R

    Ratcliff, N., L. Hallett, B.R. Ortiz, S.D. Wilson, and J.W. Harter, Coherent phonon spectroscopy and interlayer modulation of charge density wave orde r in the kagome metal CsV 3 Sb 5. Physical Review Materials, 2021. 5(11): p. L111801

    2021

  11. [11]

    Kennes, M

    de la Torre, A., D.M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J.W. McIver, and M.A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials. Reviews of Modern Physics,

  12. [12]

    Gerber, S., S.-L. Yang, D. Zhu, H. Soifer, J.A. Sobota, S. Rebec, J.J. Lee, T. Jia, B. Moritz, C. Jia, A. Gauthier, Y. Li, D. Leuenberger, Y. Zhang, L. Chaix, W. Li, H. Jang, J.-S. Lee, M. Yi, G.L. Dakovski, S. Song, J.M. Glownia, S. Nelson, K.W. Kim, Y. -D. Chuang, Z. Hussain, R.G. Moore, T.P. Devereaux, W.-S. Lee, P.S. Kirchmann, and Z.-X. Shen, Femtose...

    2017

  13. [13]

    Rohde, T

    Yang, L.X., G. Rohde, T. Rohwer, A. Stange, K. Hanff, C. Sohrt, L. Rettig, R. Cortés, F. Chen, D.L. Feng, T. Wolf, B. Kamble, I. Eremin, T. Popmintchev, M.M. Murnane, H.C. Kapteyn, L. Kipp, J. Fink, M. Bauer, U. Bovensiepen, and K. Rossnagel, Ultr afast Modulation of the Chemical Potential in ${\mathrm{BaFe}}_{2}{\mathrm{As}}_{2}$ by Coherent Phonons. Phy...

    2014

  14. [14]

    Morrison, B.L.M

    Chatelain, R.P., V.R. Morrison, B.L.M. Klarenaar, and B.J. Siwick, Coherent and Incoherent Electron-Phonon Coupling in Graphite Observed with Radio -Frequency Compressed Ultrafast Electron Diffraction. Physical Review Letters, 2014. 113(23): p. 235502. 27

    2014

  15. [15]

    Hedayat, A

    Sayers, C.J., H. Hedayat, A. Ceraso, F. Museur, M. Cattelan, L.S. Hart, L.S. Farrar, S. Dal Con te, G. Cerullo, C. Dallera, E. Da Como, and E. Carpene, Coherent phonons and the interplay between charge density wave and Mott phases in $1T \ensuremath{- }\mathrm{Ta}{\mathrm{Se}}_{2}$. Physical Review B, 2020. 102(16): p. 161105

    2020

  16. [16]

    Wu, S., W. Chu, Y. Lu , and M. Ji, Imaging Ultrafast Dynamics of Pressure -Driven Phase Transitions in Black Phosphorus and Anomalous Coherent Phonon Softening. Nano Letters,

  17. [17]

    Wall, S., S. Yang, L. Vidas, M. Chollet, J.M. Glownia, M. Kozina, T. Katayama, T. Henighan, M. Jiang, T.A. Miller, D.A. Reis, L.A. Boatner, O. Delaire, and M. Trigo, Ultrafast disordering of vanadium dimers in photoexcited VO<sub>2</sub>. Science, 2018. 362(6414): p. 572-576

    2018

  18. [18]

    Vidal, T

    Zeiger, H., J. Vidal, T. Cheng, E. Ippen, G. Dresselhaus, and M. Dresselhaus, Theory for displacive excitation of coherent phonons. Physical Review B, 1992. 45(2): p. 768

    1992

  19. [19]

    Solid state communications,

    Merlin, R., Generating coherent THz phonons with light pulses. Solid state communications,

  20. [20]

    102(2-3): p. 207-220

  21. [21]

    Kuhl, and R

    Stevens, T., J. Kuhl, and R. Merlin, Coherent phonon generation and the two stimulated Raman tensors. Physical Review B, 2002. 65(14): p. 144304

    2002

  22. [22]

    Kitajima, S

    Hase, M., M. Kitajima, S. -i. Nakashima, and K. Mizoguchi, Dynamics of coherent anharmonic phonons in bismuth using high density photoexcitation. Physical review letters, 2002. 88(6): p. 067401

    2002

  23. [23]

    Albrecht, J

    Garrett, G., T. Albrecht, J. Whitaker, and R. Merlin, Coherent THz phonons driven by light pulses and the Sb problem: what is the mechanism? Physical review letters, 1996. 77(17): p. 3661

    1996

  24. [24]

    Wienecke, T

    Hunsche, S., K. Wienecke, T. Dekorsy, and H. Kurz, Impulsive softening of coherent phonons in tellurium. Physical review letters, 1995. 75(9): p. 1815

    1995

  25. [25]

    Mizoguchi, and S

    Hase, M., K. Mizoguchi, and S. -i. Nakashima, Generation of coherent THz phonons in GeTe ferroelectrics. Journal of Luminescence, 2000. 87: p. 836-839

    2000

  26. [26]

    Kitajima, S.-i

    Hase, M., M. Kitajima, S.-i. Nakashima, and K. Mizoguchi, Forcibly driven coherent soft phonons in GeTe with intense THz-rate pump fields. Applied physics letters, 2003. 83(24): p. 4921-4923

    2003

  27. [27]

    Xu, and R

    Wu, A.Q., X. Xu, and R. Venkatasubramanian, Ultrafast dynamics of photoexcited coherent phonon in Bi2Te3 thin films. Applied Physics Letters, 2008. 92(1)

    2008

  28. [28]

    Querales-Flores, S.W

    Huang, Y., J.D. Querales-Flores, S.W. Teitelbaum, J. Cao, T. Henighan, H. Liu, M. Jiang, G. De la Peña, V. Krapivin, and J. Haber, Ultrafast measurements of mode -specific deformation potentials of Bi 2 Te 3 and Bi 2 Se 3. Physical Review X, 2023. 13(4): p. 041050

    2023

  29. [29]

    Pei, M.G

    Schröter, N.B., D. Pei, M.G. Vergniory, Y. Sun, K. Manna, F. De Juan, J.A. Krieger, V. Süss, M. Schmidt, and P. Dudin, Chiral topological semimetal with multifold band crossings and long Fermi arcs. Nature Physics, 2019. 15(8): p. 759-765

    2019

  30. [30]

    Kapeliovich, and T

    Anisimov, S., B. Kapeliovich, and T. Perelman, Electron emission from metal surfaces exposed to ultrashort laser pulses. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz, 1974. 66(2): p. 375-377

    1974

  31. [31]

    Physical Review Letters, 1987

    Allen, P.B., Theory of thermal relaxation of electrons in metals. Physical Review Letters, 1987. 59(13): p. 1460-1463

    1987

  32. [32]

    Physical Review B— Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2006

    Carpene, E., Ultrafast laser irradiation of metals: Beyond the two-temperature model. Physical Review B— Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2006. 74(2): p. 024301

    2006

  33. [33]

    Deringer, X

    Wuttig, M., V.L. Deringer, X. Gonze, C. Bicha ra, and J.Y. Raty, Incipient metals: functional materials with a unique bonding mechanism. Advanced materials, 2018. 30(51): p. 1803777

    2018

  34. [34]

    Cojocaru-Mirédin, A.M

    Zhu, M., O. Cojocaru-Mirédin, A.M. Mio, J. Keutgen, M. Küpers, Y. Yu, J.Y. Cho, R. Dronskowski, and M. Wuttig, Unique bond breaking in crystalline phase change materials and the quest for metavalent bonding. Advanced Materials, 2018. 30(18): p. 1706735

    2018

  35. [35]

    2004: CRC Press

    Mott, N., Metal-insulator transitions. 2004: CRC Press

    2004

  36. [36]

    Fujimori, and Y

    Imada, M., A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions. Reviews of modern physics,

  37. [37]

    Ishioka, J

    Hase, M., K. Ishioka, J. Demsar, K. Ushida, and M. Kitajima, Ultrafast dynamics of coherent optical phonons and nonequilibrium electrons in transition metals. Physical Review B — Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2005. 71(18): p. 184301. 28

    2005

  38. [38]

    Demsar, and M

    Hase, M., J. Demsar, and M. Kitajima, Photoinduced Fano resonance of coherent phonons in zinc. Physical Review B— Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2006. 74(21): p. 212301

    2006

  39. [39]

    S chumacher, P

    Raty, J.Y., M. S chumacher, P. Golub, V.L. Deringer, C. Gatti, and M. Wuttig, A quantum - mechanical map for bonding and properties in solids. Advanced Materials, 2019. 31(3): p. 1806280

    2019

  40. [40]

    Schön, C. -F., S. van Bergerem, C. Mattes, A. Yadav, M. Grohe, L. Kobbelt, and M. Wu ttig, Classification of properties and their relation to chemical bonding: Essential steps toward the inverse design of functional materials. Science Advances, 2022. 8(47): p. eade0828

    2022

  41. [41]

    Raty, J.-Y. and M. Wuttig, The interplay between Peierls distortions and metavalent bonding in IV–VI compounds: comparing GeTe with related monochalcogenides. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2020. 53(23): p. 234002

    2020

  42. [42]

    Kremers, M

    Shportko, K., S. Kremers, M. Woda, D. Lencer, J. Robertson, and M. Wuttig, Resonant bonding in crystalline phase-change materials. Nature materials, 2008. 7(8): p. 653-658

    2008

  43. [43]

    Frank, T

    Hoff, F., J. Frank, T. Veslin, and M. Wuttig, Coherent Phonons in Epitaxial Thin Films of Phase - Change Material GeTe. physica status solidi (RRL) –Rapid Research Lett ers, 2025. 19(7): p. 2500125

    2025

  44. [44]

    Kerres, T

    Hoff, F., P. Kerres, T. Veslin, A.R. Jalil, T. Schmidt, S. Ritarossi, J. Köttgen, L. Bothe, J. Frank, and C.F. Schön, Bond Confinement-Dependent Peierls Distortion in Epitaxially Grown Bismuth Films. Advanced Materials, 2025. 37(7): p. 2416938

    2025

  45. [45]

    Kerres, P., Y. Zhou, H. Vaishnav, M. Raghuwanshi, J. Wang, M. Häser, M. Pohlmann, Y. Cheng, C.F. Schön, and T. Jansen, Scaling and confinement in ultrathin chalcogenide films as exemplified by gete. Small, 2022. 18(21): p. 2201753

    2022

  46. [46]

    Hoff, F. and M. Wuttig, Tailoring Optical and Vibrational Properties by Bond Confinement: The Case of Metavalent Chalcogenide and Pnictogen Thin Films. Advanced Optical Materials, 2026. 14(3): p. e01823

    2026

  47. [47]

    Zhang, K., C. Fu, S. Kelly, L. Liang, S. -H. Kang, J. Jiang, R. Zhang, Y. Wang, G. Wan, and P. Siriviboon, Thickness-dependent polaron crossover in tellurene. Science Advances, 2025. 11(2): p. eads4763

    2025

  48. [48]

    Milne, P

    Cheng, Z., T. Milne, P. Salter, J.S. Kim, S. Humphrey, M. Booth, and H. Bhaskaran, Antimony thin films demonstrate programmable optical nonlinearity. Science advances, 2021. 7 (1): p. eabd7097. 29 Supplementary Information – Divergent Coherent Phonon Responses Across the Metal -Insulator Crossover Felix Hoff, Timo Veslin, Tim Bartsch, Carl-Friedrich Schön...

    2021