pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08658 · v1 · pith:JNF6EOXNnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.LO

Extending Ontologies: From Dense Embeddings to Hybrid Quantum-Fuzzy Systems

Angjelin Hila This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.LO
keywords ontologiesknowledge graphsdense embeddingsquantum neural networksfuzzy systemsknowledge representationprobabilistic inferencecrisp inference
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems support both probabilistic and crisp inference in a single ontology representation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Integrations of ontologies with dense embeddings have so far required trading probabilistic flexibility for crisp logical precision. The paper surveys these attempts and concludes the trade-off is not fundamental. It proposes neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems, realized through quantum-neural networks, as a way to keep both modes of inference inside one representation. A reader would care because this would let knowledge bases retain explicit structure while matching the contextual power of language models. The claim rests on constructing hybrid architectures that overcome prior limits.

Core claim

The paper claims that neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems, implemented through quantum-neural networks (QNN), can serve as knowledge representation systems that accommodate both classical and contextual inference in the same representation, overcoming the probabilistic-crisp trade-off present in all prior ontology-embedding integrations.

What carries the argument

Neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems implemented through quantum-neural networks that combine crisp and probabilistic reasoning in one structure.

If this is right

  • Ontology extensions can retain explicit modeling while adding contextual inference capabilities.
  • Knowledge graphs no longer need separate modules for probabilistic versus logical queries.
  • LLM-based retrieval can incorporate structured ontologies without losing adaptability.
  • Quantum-neural networks become a practical substrate for unified classical and contextual reasoning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such systems might allow a single knowledge base to answer both rule-based and statistical questions without switching representations.
  • Domains with mixed logical and uncertain data, such as clinical guidelines, could test whether the hybrid approach reduces error rates.
  • Integration with existing LLM pipelines could produce responses that are simultaneously explainable via ontology paths and flexible via contextual embeddings.

Load-bearing premise

A hybrid quantum-neural architecture can be constructed to support both probabilistic and crisp inference simultaneously without the trade-offs of earlier methods.

What would settle it

Construction of a quantum-neural network for an ontology that either cannot perform both inference types at usable accuracy or reproduces the same performance trade-off as existing embedding approaches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08658 by Angjelin Hila.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Quantum Neuro-Fuzzy System Pipeline. requires operations that account for graded membership, such as fuzzy AND (min(x, y)) and fuzzy OR (max(x, y)), where x and y are membership degrees of distinct fuzzy sets. For instance, if x denotes the membership degree of the fuzzy set happy and y that of educated, then their union can be modeled using min(x, y). As the TOFFOLI gate primarily performs conditional fli… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

LLMs have revolutionized knowledge representation and retrieval, but lack the explicit modeling that knowledge ontologies possess. This paper surveys the ways that ontologies and knowledge graphs have been integrated with dense embedding algorithms. All hitherto attempts involve a trade-off between probabilistic and crisp inference. This paper proposes a novel frontier for devising knowledge representation systems that can simultaneously accommodate probabilistic and crisp inference in the same representation. To this effect, the paper proposes neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems as knowledge representation systems that accommodate both classical and contextual inference implemented through quantum-neural networks (QNN).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript surveys integrations of ontologies and knowledge graphs with dense embeddings, identifies a universal trade-off between probabilistic and crisp inference in prior work, and proposes neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems implemented via quantum-neural networks (QNN) as a new class of knowledge representation systems capable of supporting both classical and contextual inference in a single representation.

Significance. If a concrete QNN-based architecture were shown to simultaneously support crisp and probabilistic inference without the documented trade-offs, the result would be significant for knowledge representation and hybrid AI systems. The manuscript, however, contains no such architecture, derivation, or validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems 'can simultaneously accommodate probabilistic and crisp inference in the same representation' is asserted without any formal model, circuit construction, loss function, proof, or experimental result; the text supplies only terminology and a high-level proposal.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript states that 'all hitherto attempts involve a trade-off' yet provides neither citations to specific prior works documenting this trade-off nor any derivation showing how the proposed QNN representation avoids it.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

Thank you for the referee's review. The manuscript is a conceptual proposal and survey identifying a gap in ontology-embedding integrations and outlining neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems as a future direction; it does not claim to deliver a complete implementation. We respond point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems 'can simultaneously accommodate probabilistic and crisp inference in the same representation' is asserted without any formal model, circuit construction, loss function, proof, or experimental result; the text supplies only terminology and a high-level proposal.

    Authors: We agree the manuscript supplies only a high-level proposal without formal model, circuit, loss function, proof or experiments. The intent is to define a new research direction rather than present a completed system. We will revise the abstract and introduction to state explicitly that the work is a position paper proposing a class of systems for future development. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript states that 'all hitherto attempts involve a trade-off' yet provides neither citations to specific prior works documenting this trade-off nor any derivation showing how the proposed QNN representation avoids it.

    Authors: The body of the manuscript contains a survey of ontology-embedding integrations that identifies the probabilistic/crisp trade-off. We accept that the abstract lacks explicit citations and will add them. No derivation showing how QNN avoids the trade-off is provided because the paper is a proposal, not an implementation; we will add a sentence clarifying this scope. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The manuscript contains no concrete QNN architecture, circuit construction, loss function, proof or experimental validation demonstrating simultaneous crisp and probabilistic inference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: high-level conceptual proposal with no equations, derivations, or fitted quantities

full rationale

The manuscript is a survey-plus-proposal text that identifies a trade-off in prior ontology-embedding work and then names a new class of systems (neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems) said to overcome it via QNNs. No equations, loss functions, circuit constructions, parameter fits, or formal derivations appear anywhere in the text. Consequently none of the seven enumerated circularity patterns can be instantiated: there are no self-definitional steps, no fitted inputs relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to prior author work. The proposal remains at the level of terminology and aspiration; its central claim is therefore not shown to be equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests entirely on the postulation of a new hybrid system whose feasibility is asserted without external benchmarks, prior implementations, or independent evidence.

invented entities (2)
  • neuro-quantum-fuzzy systems no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as knowledge representation systems that accommodate both classical and contextual inference
    Introduced in the abstract as a novel frontier without any prior literature citation or implementation evidence.
  • quantum-neural networks (QNN) for ontology integration no independent evidence
    purpose: To implement the hybrid inference capability
    Referenced as the implementation vehicle but without any architectural specification or reference to existing QNN work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5607 in / 1296 out tokens · 26377 ms · 2026-06-27T18:42:47.170333+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 8 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Large language models hallucination: A comprehensive survey.Computer Science Review, 61:100970, 2026

    Aisha Alansari and Hamzah Luqman. Large language models hallucination: A comprehensive survey.Computer Science Review, 61:100970, 2026

    2026

  2. [2]

    What is the semantic web? InSemantic Web for the Working Ontologist, pages 1–12

    Dean Allemang and Jim Hendler. What is the semantic web? InSemantic Web for the Working Ontologist, pages 1–12. Elsevier, 2011

    2011

  3. [3]

    Concept2vec: Metrics for evaluating quality of embeddings for ontologi- cal concepts.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04488, 2018

    Faisal Alshargi, Saeedeh Shekarpour, Tommaso Soru, and Amit Sheth. Concept2vec: Metrics for evaluating quality of embeddings for ontologi- cal concepts.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04488, 2018. 19

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Princeton Univ

    Aristotle.The Complete Works of Aristotle, volume 2 ofBollingen Se- ries, 71,2. Princeton Univ. Pr, Princeton, N.J, print., with corr., [nachdr.] edition, 2009

    2009

  5. [5]

    Princeton Univ

    Aristotle.The Complete Works of Aristotle, volume 1 ofBollingen Se- ries, 71,2. Princeton Univ. Pr, Princeton, N.J, print., with corr., [nachdr.] edition, 2009

    2009

  6. [6]

    Spear.Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology

    Robert Arp, Barry Smith, and Andrew D. Spear.Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. MIT Press, London, England, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    Dutoi, Peter J

    Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik, Anthony D. Dutoi, Peter J. Love, and Martin Head- Gordon. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies.Science, 309(5741):1704–1707, 2005

    2005

  8. [8]

    Packt Publishing, Birmingham, England; Mumbai, 2021

    Joseph Babcock and Raghav Bali.Generative AI with Python and Ten- sorFlow 2: Create Images, Text, and Music with VAEs, GANs, LSTMs, Transformer Models. Packt Publishing, Birmingham, England; Mumbai, 2021

    2021

  9. [9]

    O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2023

    Jesus Barrasa and Jim Webber.Building Knowledge Graphs. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2023

    2023

  10. [10]

    Osborne, Robert Salzmann, Daniel Scheiermann, and Ramona Wolf

    Kerstin Beer, Dmytro Bondarenko, Terry Farrelly, Tobias J. Osborne, Robert Salzmann, Daniel Scheiermann, and Ramona Wolf. Training deep quantum neural networks.Nature Communications, 11(808), 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    Representation learn- ing: A review and new perspectives.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Anal- ysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8):1798–1828, 2013

    Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Pascal Vincent. Representation learn- ing: A review and new perspectives.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Anal- ysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8):1798–1828, 2013

    2013

  12. [12]

    Relphormer: Relational graph transformer for knowledge graph representations.Neurocomputing, 566:127044, 2024

    Zhen Bi, Siyuan Cheng, Jing Chen, Xiaozhuan Liang, Feiyu Xiong, and Ningyu Zhang. Relphormer: Relational graph transformer for knowledge graph representations.Neurocomputing, 566:127044, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Enriching word vectors with subword information.Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5:135–146, 2017

    Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. Enriching word vectors with subword information.Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5:135–146, 2017

    2017

  14. [14]

    Owl2vec*: Embedding of owl ontologies

    Jiaoyan Chen, Pan Hu, Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz, Ole Magnus Holter, Denvar Antonyrajah, and Ian Horrocks. Owl2vec*: Embedding of owl ontologies. Machine Learning, 2021

    2021

  15. [15]

    Hitter: Hierarchical transformers for knowledge graph embed- dings

    Sanxing Chen, Xiao Liu, Jianwen Gao, Joseph Jiao, Ruixiang Zhang, and Yiming Ji. Hitter: Hierarchical transformers for knowledge graph embed- dings. In Marie-Francine Moens, Xuanjing Huang, Lucia Specia, and Scott Wen-tau Yih, editors,Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 10395–10407. Association for...

    2021

  16. [16]

    Quantum computers, quantum computing, and quan- tum thermodynamics.Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology, 3:1422257, 2024

    Fabrizio Cleri. Quantum computers, quantum computing, and quan- tum thermodynamics.Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology, 3:1422257, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Fuzzy ontologies: State of the art re- visited

    Valerie Cross and Shangye Chen. Fuzzy ontologies: State of the art re- visited. InCommunications in Computer and Information Science, pages 230–242. Springer, Cham, 2018

    2018

  18. [18]

    A systematic review on the use of ontologies in requirements engineering

    Diego Dermeval, Monalessa Vilela, Jaelson Castro, Ig Bittencourt, Seiji Isotani, and Patrick Brito. A systematic review on the use of ontologies in requirements engineering. InProceedings of the 2014 Brazilian Sympo- sium on Software Engineering (SBES), pages 1–10. IEEE Computer Soci- ety, 2014

    2014

  19. [19]

    Naik, and Jonathan Larson

    Darren Edge, Ha Trinh, Newman Cheng, Joshua Bradley, Alex Chao, Apurva N. Naik, and Jonathan Larson. From local to global: A graph RAG approach to query-focused summarization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16130, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Ontological errors taxonomy: Inconsistency, incompleteness and redundancy

    Muhammad Fahad, Muhammad Abdul Qadir, and Muhammad Wajahat Noshairwan. Ontological errors taxonomy: Inconsistency, incompleteness and redundancy. InProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), pages 311–314. SciTePress, 2008

    2008

  21. [21]

    University of Turin, 2005

    Maurizio Ferraris.Ontology: A Brief History. University of Turin, 2005

    2005

  22. [22]

    Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modeled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought (1879)

    Gottlob Frege. Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modeled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought (1879). InFrege and G¨ odel, pages 1–82. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London, England, 1970

    1970

  23. [23]

    Srivastava, Harit Vishwakarma, Hima Karanam, and L

    Dinesh Garg, Shajith Ikbal, Santosh K. Srivastava, Harit Vishwakarma, Hima Karanam, and L. Venkata Subramaniam. Quantum embedding of knowledge for reasoning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019

    2019

  24. [24]

    Establishing a new link between fuzzy logic, neuro- science, and quantum mechanics through bayesian probability.Molecules, 26(19):5987, 2021

    Pier Luigi Gentili. Establishing a new link between fuzzy logic, neuro- science, and quantum mechanics through bayesian probability.Molecules, 26(19):5987, 2021

    2021

  25. [25]

    MIT Press, London, England, 2019

    Lise Getoor and Ben Taskar, editors.Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press, London, England, 2019

    2019

  26. [26]

    Long short-term memory

    Alex Graves. Long short-term memory. InStudies in Computational Intel- ligence, pages 37–45. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012

    2012

  27. [27]

    Roberts, and Brandon M

    Justin Grimmer, Margaret E. Roberts, and Brandon M. Stewart.Text as Data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    Recurrent neural networks.Scholarpedia, 2013

    Stephen Grossberg. Recurrent neural networks.Scholarpedia, 2013. 21

    2013

  29. [29]

    Node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00653, 2016

    Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. Node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00653, 2016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Ontology (definition)

    Tom Gruber. Ontology (definition). InEncyclopedia of Database Systems, pages 1963–1965. Springer, Berlin, 2009

    1963

  31. [31]

    Long short-term memory.Neu- ral Computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997

    Sepp Hochreiter and J¨ urgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory.Neu- ral Computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997

    1997

  32. [32]

    Logic and ontology

    Thomas Hofweber. Logic and ontology. In Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodel- man, editors,The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Re- search Lab, Stanford University, spring 2023 edition, 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    Ontology reasoning with deep neural networks.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 68:503– 540, 2020

    Patrick Hohenecker and Thomas Lukasiewicz. Ontology reasoning with deep neural networks.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 68:503– 540, 2020

    2020

  34. [34]

    Myklebust, Jiaoyan Chen, and Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz

    Ole Magnus Holter, Erik B. Myklebust, Jiaoyan Chen, and Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz. Embedding owl ontologies with owl2vec? InCEUR Work- shop Proceedings, 2019

    2019

  35. [35]

    J.-S. R. Jang. Anfis: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3):665–685, 1993

    1993

  36. [36]

    Knowl- edge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix

    Guoliang Ji, Shizhu He, Liheng Xu, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. Knowl- edge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix. In Chengqing Zong and Michael Strube, editors,Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Pa- pers), pages 6...

    2015

  37. [37]

    A survey on statistical relational learning

    Hassan Khosravi and Bahareh Bina. A survey on statistical relational learning. InAdvances in Artificial Intelligence, pages 256–268. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010

    2010

  38. [38]

    Gemini 1.5 Pro 2M context window, code execution capabilities, and Gemma 2 are available today

    Logan Kilpatrick, Shrestha Basu Mallick, and Ronen Kofman. Gemini 1.5 Pro 2M context window, code execution capabilities, and Gemma 2 are available today. Google Developers Blog, June 27 2024. Accessed: May 16, 2026

    2024

  39. [39]

    Klir.Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications

    George J. Klir.Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, 2015

    2015

  40. [40]

    Seiji Koide, Jans Aasman, and Steven Haflich. Owl vs. object oriented programming, 2005

    2005

  41. [41]

    Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion

    Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu, and Xuan Zhu. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In Blai Bonet and Sven Koenig, editors,Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2181–2187. AAAI Press, 2015. 22

    2015

  42. [42]

    Knowformer: Revisiting transformers for knowledge graph reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12865v2, 2024

    Junnan Liu, Qianren Mao, Weifeng Jiang, and Jianxin Li. Knowformer: Revisiting transformers for knowledge graph reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12865v2, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Mask and reason: Pre-training knowledge graph transformers for complex logical queries

    Xiao Liu, Hongyu Zhao, Zhen Tan, Jiarong Xu, Hongxia Yang, and Jie Tang. Mask and reason: Pre-training knowledge graph transformers for complex logical queries. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Inter- national Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’22, pages 1120–1130, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery

    2022

  44. [44]

    Yanhui Lv, Z. M. Ma, and Li Yan. Fuzzy rdf: A data model to represent fuzzy metadata. In2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), pages 1439–1445. IEEE, 2008

    2008

  45. [45]

    Ontologies vs

    Bodil Nistrup Madsen and Hanne Erdman Thomsen. Ontologies vs. clas- sification systems, 2009

    2009

  46. [46]

    Blending fuzzy set theory and quantum computation

    Mirco Mannucci. Blending fuzzy set theory and quantum computation. arXiv preprint cs/0604064, 2006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Medsker and Lakhmi C

    Larry R. Medsker and Lakhmi C. Jain.Recurrent Neural Networks: Design and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999

    1999

  48. [48]

    Mendel, Qilian Liang, and W

    Jerry M. Mendel, Qilian Liang, and W. E. Combs. Comments on ”com- binatorial rule explosion eliminated by a fuzzy rule configuration” [with reply].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 7(3):369–373, 1999

    1999

  49. [49]

    Ontology completion with graph-based machine learning: A comprehensive evalua- tion.Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 4(4):1107–1123, 2022

    Sebastian Meˇ znar, Matej Bevec, Nada Lavraˇ c, and Blaˇ zˇSkrlj. Ontology completion with graph-based machine learning: A comprehensive evalua- tion.Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 4(4):1107–1123, 2022

    2022

  50. [50]

    Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space.arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013

    Tomas Mikolov. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space.arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  51. [51]

    Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositional- ity.arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.4546, 2013

    Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositional- ity.arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.4546, 2013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D. Manning. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. InProceedings of the 2014 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1532–1543. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014

    2014

  53. [53]

    Love, Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L

    Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao- Qi Zhou, Peter J. Love, Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L. O’Brien. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor.Nature Communications, 5(4213), 2014. 23

    2014

  54. [54]

    Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christo- pher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer

    Matthew E. Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christo- pher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Deep contextualized word representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05365, 2018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Fuzzy logic on quantum annealers.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(8):3389–3394, 2022

    Amir Pourabdollah, Giovanni Acampora, and Roberto Schiattarella. Fuzzy logic on quantum annealers.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(8):3389–3394, 2022

    2022

  56. [56]

    Two dogmas of empiricism.The Philosophical Review, 60(1):20–43, 1951

    Willard Van Orman Quine. Two dogmas of empiricism.The Philosophical Review, 60(1):20–43, 1951

    1951

  57. [57]

    why should i trust you?

    Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. “why should i trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. InProceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’16, pages 1135–1144, New York, NY, USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery

    2016

  58. [58]

    V. F. Rickey and Jan J. T. Srzednicki, editors.Le´ sniewski’s Systems, vol- ume 13 ofNijhoff International Philosophy Series. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2011

    2011

  59. [59]

    Rdf2vec: Rdf graph embeddings for data mining

    Petar Ristoski and Heiko Paulheim. Rdf2vec: Rdf graph embeddings for data mining. InLecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 498–514. Springer, Cham, 2016

    2016

  60. [60]

    Rumelhart, James L

    David E. Rumelhart, James L. McClelland, and PDP Research Group. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cog- nition: Foundations. MIT Press, 1986

    1986

  61. [61]

    On the relation between fuzzy and quantum logic

    Ingo Schmitt, Andreas N¨ urnberger, and Sebastian Lehrack. On the relation between fuzzy and quantum logic. InViews on Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pages 417–438. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009

    2009

  62. [62]

    The quest for a quantum neural network.Quantum Information Processing, 13(11):2567– 2586, 2014

    Maria Schuld, Ilya Sinayskiy, and Francesco Petruccione. The quest for a quantum neural network.Quantum Information Processing, 13(11):2567– 2586, 2014

    2014

  63. [63]

    Mike Schuster and Kuldip K. Paliwal. Bidirectional recurrent neural net- works.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 45(11):2673–2681, 1997

    1997

  64. [64]

    Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1987

    Peter Simons.Parts: A Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1987

    1987

  65. [65]

    Onto2vec: Joint vector-based representation of biological entities and their ontology-based annotations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.00864, 2018

    Fatima Zohra Smaili, Xin Gao, and Robert Hoehndorf. Onto2vec: Joint vector-based representation of biological entities and their ontology-based annotations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.00864, 2018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Opa2vec: Com- bining formal and informal content of biomedical ontologies to improve similarity-based prediction.Bioinformatics, 35(12):2133–2140, 2019

    Fatima Zohra Smaili, Xin Gao, and Robert Hoehndorf. Opa2vec: Com- bining formal and informal content of biomedical ontologies to improve similarity-based prediction.Bioinformatics, 35(12):2133–2140, 2019. 24

    2019

  67. [67]

    A review on the long short-term memory model.Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(8):5929– 5955, 2020

    Greg Van Houdt, Carlos Mosquera, and Gonzalo N´ apoles. A review on the long short-term memory model.Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(8):5929– 5955, 2020

    2020

  68. [68]

    Metaphysics

    Peter Van Inwagen and Meghan Sullivan. Metaphysics. In Edward N. Zalta, editor,The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Re- search Lab, Stanford University, spring 2020 edition, 2020

    2020

  69. [69]

    Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762, 2017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Owl 2 web ontology language document overview (second edition), 2012

    W3C. Owl 2 web ontology language document overview (second edition), 2012

    2012

  71. [71]

    SimKGC: Simple con- trastive knowledge graph completion with pre-trained language models

    Liang Wang, Wei Zhao, Zhiyuan Wei, and Jing Liu. SimKGC: Simple con- trastive knowledge graph completion with pre-trained language models. In Smaranda Muresan, Preslav Nakov, and Aline Villavicencio, editors,Pro- ceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4281–4294, Dublin, Ireland,

  72. [72]

    Association for Computational Linguistics

  73. [73]

    Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes

    Zhen Wang, Jianwen Zhang, Jianlin Feng, and Zheng Chen. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In Carla E. Brodley and Peter Stone, editors,Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1112–1119. AAAI Press, 2014

    2014

  74. [74]

    KG-BERT: BERT for knowl- edge graph completion.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.03193, 2019

    Liang Yao, Chengping Mao, and Yuan Luo. KG-BERT: BERT for knowl- edge graph completion.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.03193, 2019

    arXiv 1909

  75. [75]

    Knowledge graph enhanced large language model editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13593v1, 2024

    Mengqi Zhang, Xiaotian Ye, Qiang Liu, Pengjie Ren, Shu Wu, and Zhumin Chen. Knowledge graph enhanced large language model editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13593v1, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Understanding bag-of-words model: A statistical framework.International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 1(1-4):43–52, 2010

    Yin Zhang, Rong Jin, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. Understanding bag-of-words model: A statistical framework.International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 1(1-4):43–52, 2010. 25 Primitive KG property KnowF ormer Relphormer GLAME Entity identity Yes Yes Yes Relation identity Yes Yes Yes Directionality Yes Mostly yes Partially yes Arity Mostly binary tripl...

    2010