pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09179 · v1 · pith:AACBCJ2Nnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Designing electronic magnetoelectric matter with organic quantum spin trimers

Yuko Hosokoshi , Christopher P. Aoyama , Zhuowei Zhang , Toshio Ono , Kosuke Takada , Ayaka Higashiguchi , Seitaro Iisaka , Koudai Yamasaki
show 12 more authors
Hironori Yamaguchi Shengzhi Zhang Mohammad Irfan Minseong Lee Eun Sang Choi Yasuyuki Shimura Toshiro Sakakibara Zhiyuan Xie Hiroki Nakano Yasu Takano Cristian D. Batista Yoshitomo Kamiya
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magnetoelectricityquantum spin trimerorganic radicalgeometric frustrationdielectric anomalymagnetization plateauTNN CH3CN
0
0 comments X

The pith

Organic quantum spin trimers generate electric dipoles via electronic fluctuations and organize them into collective magnetoelectric states through geometric frustration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that a lattice of equilateral S=1/2 quantum spin trimers in the organic crystal TNN·CH3CN produces electric dipoles from correlated electronic fluctuations inside each trimer. These dipoles then form collective magnetoelectric states because of geometrically frustrated interactions between the trimers. Measurements show multiple phases under magnetic field, notably a 1/3-magnetization plateau with strong dielectric responses. The authors argue this provides a molecular design principle for magnetoelectric materials based on quantum spin clusters rather than traditional spin-lattice mechanisms. Sympathetic readers would see this as opening a bottom-up chemical route to engineer materials where magnetism and electricity are intrinsically linked at the electronic level.

Core claim

In TNN·CH3CN, correlated electronic fluctuations within each trimer generate electric dipoles, while geometrically frustrated intertrimer interactions organize them into collective ME states, as evidenced by multiple magnetic-field-induced phases including the 1/3-magnetization plateau marked by pronounced dielectric anomalies. Effective low-energy theories and numerical simulations show that these phenomena are driven by electronically generated trimer dipoles whose collective order is stabilized by frustration relief of the intertrimer interactions, establishing a direct connection between geometric frustration and emergent magnetoelectricity.

What carries the argument

The equilateral S=1/2 spin trimer, whose correlated electronic fluctuations intrinsically generate electric dipoles that interact via geometric frustration to produce collective magnetoelectric order.

If this is right

  • Multiple magnetic-field-induced phases appear, including a 1/3-magnetization plateau marked by pronounced dielectric anomalies.
  • The dielectric response originates from electronically generated trimer dipoles whose collective order is stabilized by frustration relief.
  • Quantum spin trimers function as multifunctional building blocks for designing correlated magnetoelectric materials from electronically active quantum spin clusters.
  • Geometric frustration provides a direct route to emergent magnetoelectricity without relying on spin-lattice coupling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This molecular design could be extended to other organic radical crystals containing spin trimers by chemical substitution to adjust frustration strength and tune the ME phases.
  • Analogous electronic dipole generation might be identifiable in inorganic triangular-lattice magnets if similar fluctuation-driven mechanisms can be isolated from lattice effects.
  • Low-energy effective theories for the trimer dipoles could be used to predict additional field-induced phases or temperature scales in related frustrated cluster systems.

Load-bearing premise

The dielectric response arises specifically from electronically generated trimer dipoles in a weakly coupled lattice of equilateral S=1/2 spin trimers rather than from conventional spin-lattice coupling or extrinsic effects.

What would settle it

Dielectric measurements on a modified crystal with the same trimer spin structure but suppressed electronic fluctuations (for example by altering the organic framework) that show no anomalies at the 1/3-magnetization plateau would falsify the electronic dipole mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09179 by Ayaka Higashiguchi, Christopher P. Aoyama, Cristian D. Batista, Eun Sang Choi, Hiroki Nakano, Hironori Yamaguchi, Kosuke Takada, Koudai Yamasaki, Minseong Lee, Mohammad Irfan, Seitaro Iisaka, Shengzhi Zhang, Toshio Ono, Toshiro Sakakibara, Yasu Takano, Yasuyuki Shimura, Yoshitomo Kamiya, Yuko Hosokoshi, Zhiyuan Xie, Zhuowei Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetoelectric (ME) phenomena are commonly driven by spin-lattice coupling. Here we demonstrate a different route based on frustrated quantum spin trimers that intrinsically intertwine magnetic moments and electric dipoles. Using molecular design principles, we realize a weakly coupled lattice of equilateral $S=1/2$ spin trimers in the organic radical crystal TNN$\cdot$CH$_3$CN. In this material, correlated electronic fluctuations within each trimer generate electric dipoles, while geometrically frustrated intertrimer interactions organize them into collective ME states. Magnetization, thermodynamic, and dielectric measurements reveal multiple magnetic-field-induced phases, including the $1/3$-magnetization plateau marked by pronounced dielectric anomalies. Effective low-energy theories and numerical simulations show that these phenomena are driven by electronically generated trimer dipoles whose collective order is stabilized by frustration relief of the intertrimer interactions, establishing a direct connection between geometric frustration and emergent magnetoelectricity. Our results identify quantum spin trimers as multifunctional building blocks, providing a bottom-up route for designing correlated ME materials from electronically active quantum spin clusters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to demonstrate magnetoelectric phenomena in the organic radical crystal TNN·CH3CN via a weakly coupled lattice of equilateral S=1/2 quantum spin trimers. Correlated electronic fluctuations within each trimer are said to intrinsically generate electric dipoles, which are organized into collective ME states by geometrically frustrated intertrimer interactions. This is evidenced by magnetization, thermodynamic, and dielectric measurements revealing multiple field-induced phases (including a 1/3-magnetization plateau with pronounced dielectric anomalies), together with effective low-energy theories and numerical simulations that link the phenomena to electronically generated trimer dipoles stabilized by frustration relief.

Significance. If the central interpretation is confirmed, the work identifies quantum spin trimers as multifunctional building blocks and provides a bottom-up molecular-design route to correlated magnetoelectric materials that is distinct from conventional spin-lattice coupling. This would directly connect geometric frustration to emergent magnetoelectricity and expand the design space for quantum materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'measurements and simulations support the claim' and that dielectric anomalies arise specifically from electronically generated trimer dipoles rests on an unverified interpretation; no details are supplied on data quality, error bars, simulation parameters, or quantitative linkage between the anomalies and trimer dipoles, leaving the central claim load-bearing on an assumption that standard thermodynamic/dielectric data alone cannot distinguish from conventional spin-lattice coupling.
  2. [Driving mechanism description] Driving mechanism (abstract and associated discussion): the weakest assumption—that the material realizes a weakly coupled lattice of equilateral S=1/2 trimers whose dielectric response originates from electronic fluctuations rather than spin-lattice coupling or extrinsic lattice effects—is not supported by direct microscopic validation (e.g., ab initio dipole calculations or isotope-effect tests). This is a correctness-risk concern because the effective low-energy theories and simulations presuppose the electronic origin; a concrete test would be required to falsify the conventional mechanism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting points that require clarification. We address each major comment below, providing additional context from the full text and indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'measurements and simulations support the claim' and that dielectric anomalies arise specifically from electronically generated trimer dipoles rests on an unverified interpretation; no details are supplied on data quality, error bars, simulation parameters, or quantitative linkage between the anomalies and trimer dipoles, leaving the central claim load-bearing on an assumption that standard thermodynamic/dielectric data alone cannot distinguish from conventional spin-lattice coupling.

    Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise. The full manuscript supplies the requested details: experimental figures include error bars and data quality metrics; simulation parameters and the effective Hamiltonian are specified in the methods and theory sections; and the linkage between dielectric anomalies and trimer dipoles is quantified by showing that the field positions of the anomalies coincide with the 1/3-magnetization plateau and match the predictions of the low-energy trimer model (including frustration-relief terms) without additional spin-lattice coupling. We will revise the abstract to reference these supporting elements explicitly. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Driving mechanism description] Driving mechanism (abstract and associated discussion): the weakest assumption—that the material realizes a weakly coupled lattice of equilateral S=1/2 trimers whose dielectric response originates from electronic fluctuations rather than spin-lattice coupling or extrinsic lattice effects—is not supported by direct microscopic validation (e.g., ab initio dipole calculations or isotope-effect tests). This is a correctness-risk concern because the effective low-energy theories and simulations presuppose the electronic origin; a concrete test would be required to falsify the conventional mechanism.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain direct microscopic validation such as ab initio dipole calculations or isotope-substitution experiments. The equilateral trimer geometry follows from the reported crystal structure, and the electronic origin is inferred from the absence of detectable lattice anomalies in the thermodynamic data together with the quantitative match between the observed phase diagram and the purely electronic trimer-dipole model. We will add an explicit limitations paragraph in the discussion section acknowledging the indirect nature of the evidence and outlining possible future tests. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation rests on independent measurements and simulations

full rationale

The paper's central claims are supported by magnetization, thermodynamic, and dielectric measurements on TNN·CH3CN, combined with effective low-energy theories and numerical simulations of a weakly coupled trimer lattice. No load-bearing step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any uniqueness theorem or ansatz trace exclusively to self-citation. The attribution of dielectric anomalies to electronically generated trimer dipoles is presented as an interpretation of the data rather than a definitional equivalence, and external benchmarks (experimental phases, 1/3 plateau) remain falsifiable outside the model's fitted values. This is the normal case of a self-contained experimental-theoretical study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the domain assumption that the crystal structure forms the described weakly coupled equilateral trimers and that the observed dielectric response is generated electronically by trimer fluctuations. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly quantified in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5820 in / 1336 out tokens · 36607 ms · 2026-06-27T15:13:24.733693+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Khomskii, Classifying multiferroics: Mechanisms and ef- fects, Physics2, 20 (2009)

    D. Khomskii, Classifying multiferroics: Mechanisms and ef- fects, Physics2, 20 (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    Y.Tokura,S.Seki,andN.Nagaosa,Multiferroicsofspinorigin, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 076501 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Cheong and M

    S. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity, Nature Mater.6, 13 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    Bibes and A

    M. Bibes and A. Barthélémy, Towards a magnetoelectric mem- ory, Nature Materials7, 425 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Phys.64, 519 (2015)

    S.Dong,J.-M.Liu,S.-W.Cheong,andZ.Ren,Multiferroicma- terials and magnetoelectric physics: symmetry, entanglement, excitation, and topology, Adv. Phys.64, 519 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Spin current and magnetoelectriceffectinnoncollinearmagnets,Phys.Rev.Lett. 95, 057205 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    I. A. Sergienko and E. Dagotto, Role of the Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction in multiferroic perovskites, Phys. Rev. B73, 10 094434 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    M.Mostovoy,Multiferroics: differentroutestomagnetoelectric coupling, npj Spintronics2, 18 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    L. N. Bulaevskii, C. D. Batista, M. V. Mostovoy, and D. I. Khomskii, Electronic orbital currents and polarization in Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B78, 024402 (2008)

    2008

  10. [10]

    Y.KamiyaandC.D.Batista,Multiferroicbehaviorintrimerized Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 097202 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    Zheludev, V

    A. Zheludev, V. Barone, M. Bonnet, B. Delley, A. Grand, E. Ressouche, P. Rey, R. Subra, and J. Schweizer, Spin density inanitronylnitroxidefreeradical.polarizedneutrondiffraction investigationandabinitiocalculations,J.Am.Chem.Soc.116, 2019 (1994)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Nakano, T

    Y. Nakano, T. Yagyu, T. Hirayama, A. Ito, and K. Tanaka, Synthesis and intramolecular magnetic interaction of tripheny- lamine derivatives with nitronyl nitroxide radicals, Polyhedron 24, 2141 (2005)

    2005

  13. [13]

    I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, On the magneto-electrical effects in anti- ferromagnets, Sov. Phys. JETP10, 628 (1960)

    1960

  14. [14]

    Astrov, The magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagnetics, Sov

    D. Astrov, The magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagnetics, Sov. Phys. JETP11, 708 (1960)

    1960

  15. [15]

    M. P. Sainz,Non-collinear magnetism in chiral, spinel and or- ganic magnets, Ph.D. thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza and Graduate School of Science, Osaka Prefecture University (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Z. Y. Xie, J. Chen, J. F. Yu, X. Kong, B. Normand, and T. Xi- ang,Tensorrenormalizationofquantummany-bodysystemsus- ing projected entangled simplex states, Phys. Rev. X4, 011025 (2014)

    2014

  17. [17]

    Boninsegni, Phase separation in mixtures of hard core bosons, Phys

    M. Boninsegni, Phase separation in mixtures of hard core bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 087201 (2001)

    2001

  18. [18]

    C. D. Batista, G. Ortiz, and J. E. Gubernatis, Unveiling order behind complexity: Coexistence of ferromagnetism and Bose- Einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. B65, 180402 (2002)

    2002

  19. [19]

    K.Aoki,K.Sakakibara,I.Ichinose,andT.Matsui,Magneticor- der, Bose-Einstein condensation, and superfluidity in a bosonic 𝑡-𝐽model ofCP 1 spinons and doped Higgs holons, Phys. Rev. B80, 144510 (2009)

    2009

  20. [20]

    Zhang, J.-X

    H.-K. Zhang, J.-X. Zhang, J.-S. Xu, and Z.-Y. Weng, Quantum- interference-induced pairing in antiferromagnetic bosonic𝑡-𝐽 model (2024), arXiv:2409.15424 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    T. J. Harris, U. Schollwöck, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, Kinetic magnetismandstripeorderintheantiferromagneticbosonic𝑡-𝐽 model (2024), arXiv:2410.00904 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Nagaoka, Ferromagnetism in a narrow, almost half-filled𝑠 band, Phys

    Y. Nagaoka, Ferromagnetism in a narrow, almost half-filled𝑠 band, Phys. Rev.147, 392 (1966)

    1966

  23. [23]

    J. T. Haraldsen, Evolution of thermodynamic properties and inelastic neutron scattering intensities for spin-1 2 antiferromag- netic quantum rings, Phys. Rev. B94, 054436 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    D. I. Khomskii, Spin chirality and nontrivial charge dynamics in frustrated Mott insulators: spontaneous currents and charge redistribution, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter22, 164209 (2010)

    2010

  25. [25]

    Jpn.87, 033709 (2018)

    S.HayamiandH.Kusunose,Microscopicdescriptionofelectric andmagnetictoroidalmultipolesinhybridorbitals,J.Phys.Soc. Jpn.87, 033709 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    P. Zhao, J. Yang, and G. v. Chen, Multipolar ferroelectricity in the mott regime, Phys. Rev. B111, 224416 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Takahashi, and T

    Y.Hosokoshi,Y.Nakazawa,K.Inoue,K.Takizawa,H.Nakano, M. Takahashi, and T. Goto, Magnetic properties of low- dimensional quantum spin systems made of stable organic bi- radicals PNNNO,F 2PNNNO, and PIMNO, Phys. Rev. B60, 12924 (1999)

    1999

  28. [28]

    S. J. Blundell and F. L. Pratt, Organic and molecular magnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter16, R771 (2004)

    2004

  29. [29]

    Tang and X

    S. Tang and X. Wang, Spin frustration in organic radicals, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202310147 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    E. F. Ulman, J. H. Osjecki, D. G. B. Boocock, and R. Darcy, Studies of stable free radicals. X. nitronyl nitroxide monorad- icals and biradicals as possible small molecule spin labels, J. Am. Chem. Soc.94, 7049 (1972)

    1972

  31. [31]

    Hosokoshi, M

    Y. Hosokoshi, M. Tamura, M. Kinoshita, H. Sawa, R. Kato, Y.Fujiwara,andY.Ueda,Magneticpropertiesandcrystalstruc- ture of the𝑝-fluorophenyl nitronyl nitroxide radical crystal: ferromagnetic intermolecular interactions leading to a three- dimensional network of ground triplet dimeric molecules, J. Mater. Chem.4, 1219 (1994)

    1994

  32. [32]

    Phys.33, 5067 (1994)

    T.Sakakibara,H.Mitamura,T.Tayama,andH.Amitsuka,Fara- dayforcemagnetometerforhigh-sensitivitymagnetizationmea- surementsatverylowtemperaturesandhighfields,Jpn.J.Appl. Phys.33, 5067 (1994)

    1994

  33. [33]

    Shimizu, Y

    Y. Shimizu, Y. Kono, T. Sugiyama, S. Kittaka, Y. Shimura, A. Miyake, D. Aoki, and T. Sakakibara, Development of high- resolutioncapacitiveFaradaymagnetometersforsub-Kelvinre- gion, Rev. Sci. Instrum.92, 123908 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    H.Tsujii,B.Andraka,E.C.Palm,T.P.Murphy,andY.Takano, Calorimeter for a top-loading dilution refrigerator in high mag- netic fields, PhysicaB329–333, 1638 (2002)

    2002

  35. [35]

    E. M. Stoudenmire, S. Trebst,and L. Balents, Quadrupolarcor- relations and spin freezing in𝑆=1triangular lattice antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. B79, 214436 (2009)

    2009

  36. [36]

    Zhang and C

    H. Zhang and C. D. Batista, Classical spin dynamics based on SU(𝑁)coherent states, Phys. Rev. B104, 104409 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    U. F. P. Seifert and L. Savary, Phase diagrams and excitations of anisotropic𝑆=1quantum magnets on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B106, 195147 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Remund, R

    K. Remund, R. Pohle, Y. Akagi, J. Romhányi, and N. Shannon, Semi-classical simulation of spin-1 magnets, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033106 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Pohle, N

    R. Pohle, N. Shannon, and Y. Motome, Spin nematics meet spin liquids: Exotic quantum phases in the spin-1 bilinear- biquadratic model with Kitaev interactions, Phys. Rev. B107, L140403 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    Iwazaki, H

    R. Iwazaki, H. Shinaoka, and S. Hoshino, Material-based anal- ysis of spin-orbital Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, L241108 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Orús and G

    R. Orús and G. Vidal, Simulation of two-dimensional quantum 11 systems on an infinite lattice revisited: Corner transfer matrix for tensor contraction, Phys. Rev. B80, 094403 (2009)

    2009

  42. [42]

    Corboz, T

    P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Competing states in the 𝑡-𝐽model: Uniform𝑑-wave state versus stripe state, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 046402 (2014)

    2014

  43. [43]

    Innes, Don’t unroll adjoint: Differentiating SSA-form pro- grams (2018), arXiv:1810.07951

    M. Innes, Don’t unroll adjoint: Differentiating SSA-form pro- grams (2018), arXiv:1810.07951

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    L.Devos,M.VanDamme,J.Haegeman,andcontributors,Ten- soroperations.jl (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    Liao, J.-G

    H.-J. Liao, J.-G. Liu, L. Wang, and T. Xiang, Differentiable programming tensor networks, Phys. Rev. X9, 031041 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of Condensed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  47. [47]

    M.Ferrero,F.Becca,andF.Mila,Freezingandlargetimescales induced by geometrical frustration, Phys. Rev. B68, 214431 (2003)

    2003

  48. [48]

    Designing electronic magnetoelectric matter with organic quantum spin trimers

    I.TanakaandH.Tsunetsugu,Nematicityliquidinatrimerized- kagome antiferromagnet, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 063707 (2021). VI. Methods A. Sample preparation and X-ray diffraction The organic neutral radical TNN was synthesized by the conventional method [30, 31] from 2,3-bis(hydroxylamino)- 2,3-dimethylbutane and tris(4-formylphenyl)amine. Tris(4- formylphenyl)a...

    2021

  49. [49]

    ThiscorrespondstoreplacingS↦→ (0,0,1/2)foralltrimersinEq.(B5). Allterms linear in the pseudospin operators cancel by symmetry, yielding the orbital compass Hamiltonian, ˆHComp = ∑︁ r∈even ∑︁ 0≤𝜇<2 𝐽 𝜏 𝑎𝑏 ˆτr ·n 𝜇 ˆτr+e𝑎𝑏𝜇 ·n 𝜇 +𝐽 𝜏 𝑐 ˆτr ·n 𝜇 ˆτr+e𝑐,even 𝜇 ·n 𝜇 + ∑︁ r∈odd ∑︁ 0≤𝜇<2 𝐽 𝜏 𝑎𝑏 ˆτr ·n 𝜇 ˆτr−e 𝑎𝑏𝜇 ·n 𝜇 +𝐽 𝜏 𝑐 ˆτr ·n 𝜇 ˆτr+e𝑐,odd 𝜇 ·n 𝜇 ,(B8) wher...