pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09280 · v1 · pith:TCYKD6NTnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🧮 math.AP · math.DG

The effect of geometric focusing on dispersive estimates for Schr\"odinger and wave equations

Qiuye Jia , Junyong Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math.DG
keywords dispersive estimatesSchrödinger equationwave equationgeometric focusingconjugate pointsasymptotically conic manifoldsmetric conesLegendre submanifold
0
0 comments X

The pith

Each multiplicity of conjugate points within distance π on cone boundaries causes a |t|^{1/2} loss in long-time Schrödinger dispersive decay.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper classifies long-time decay rates in dispersive estimates for the Schrödinger and wave equations on non-trapping asymptotically conic manifolds according to the intensity of geometric focusing. On exact metric cones, each multiplicity of conjugate points within distance π on the boundary Y leads to a |t|^{1/2} loss in the decay order together with a half-order shift in the regularity index for the Schrödinger equation. Conjugate point pairs at distance π produce no loss when the Legendre submanifold carrying the propagation satisfies the admissible condition proposed in the work. The classification supplies a framework that remains valid under small geometric perturbations and under addition of potentials.

Core claim

On non-trapping asymptotically conic manifolds and metric cones, the long-time dispersive decay for the Schrödinger and wave equations is governed by the multiplicity of conjugate points within distance π on the boundary Y of the cone X0, with each such multiplicity producing a |t|^{1/2} loss in decay order and a half-order regularity shift, except that pairs exactly at distance π cause no loss when the Legendre submanifold satisfies the admissible condition.

What carries the argument

The multiplicity of conjugate points within distance π on the boundary Y, which quantifies geometric focusing intensity and fixes the precise loss terms in the dispersive estimates.

If this is right

  • The long-time decay order decreases by |t|^{1/2} for every additional multiplicity of conjugate points inside distance π.
  • The Sobolev regularity index in the estimate shifts by one half for each such multiplicity.
  • The admissible condition on the Legendre submanifold eliminates the loss for specific pairs at distance π.
  • The estimates remain valid after small changes to the metric and after adding potentials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same focusing classification may apply to other dispersive equations on asymptotically conic geometries.
  • Euclidean space, which has no conjugate points, recovers the standard decay rates with no geometric losses.
  • Explicit spherical cones could serve as test cases to verify when the admissible condition holds and losses are avoided.

Load-bearing premise

The manifolds are non-trapping and asymptotically conic, and wave propagation on the Legendre submanifold satisfies the admissible condition that prevents loss for certain pairs at distance π.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the Schrödinger dispersive estimate on a concrete metric cone containing two conjugate points at distance π, checking whether the observed decay rate matches the predicted loss or the admissible-condition exemption.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09280 by Junyong Zhang, Qiuye Jia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The b-low-energy space X2 b,♭. to X2 b . This reflects the connection between this low-energy space and the recent work on the second microlocalization in [58, 59] that encodes the b-analysis and the sc-analysis simultaneously. See [58, Section 5] [59, Section 2] for more details.3 Compared with the low-energy case, the high-energy space X2 b,# is simpler: X2 b,# := [0, h0) × X2 b , h0 > 1, (2.4) where X2 … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We classify the long-time decay rate in dispersive estimates for the Schr\"odinger and wave equations on non-trapping asymptotically conic manifolds and exact metric cones in terms of the intensity of geometric focusing. Letting $X_0$ be a metric cone, one of our main results demonstrates that each multiplicity of conjugate points within distance $\pi$ on $Y=\partial X_0$ leads to a $|t|^{1/2}$-loss in the long-time decay order and a half-order shift in the regularity index in the dispersive estimate for the Schr\"odinger equation. Unexpectedly, conjugate point pairs on $Y$ at distance $\pi$ do not cause loss when the Legendre submanifold carrying the wave propagation satisfies a natural admissible condition that we propose. In sum, we give a robust framework for proving dispersive estimates that is stable under geometric perturbations and also accommodates perturbations by potentials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript classifies long-time decay rates in dispersive estimates for the Schrödinger and wave equations on non-trapping asymptotically conic manifolds and exact metric cones in terms of the multiplicity of conjugate points on Y = ∂X0 within distance π. Each such multiplicity is claimed to produce a |t|^{1/2} loss in the decay order together with a half-order shift in the regularity index for the Schrödinger equation; conjugate-point pairs at exactly distance π cause no loss when the Legendre submanifold satisfies a proposed admissible condition. The framework is asserted to be stable under geometric perturbations and to accommodate potential perturbations.

Significance. If the derivations are complete, the explicit geometric classification of focusing losses supplies a concrete, checkable criterion for decay rates that is stable under perturbations. This is a substantive contribution to the literature on dispersive estimates on non-compact manifolds, as it replaces case-by-case analysis with a uniform multiplicity count and isolates a verifiable exception via the admissible condition on the wavefront set.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, main results paragraph] Abstract and main-results paragraph: the admissible condition on the Legendre submanifold is load-bearing for the exception at distance π, yet its precise definition, the verification that it is checkable from the geometry, and the proof that it eliminates the |t|^{1/2} loss are not supplied in the abstract; without these details the exception cannot be assessed as non-ad-hoc.
  2. [Main results / dispersive estimate section] The central claim that each multiplicity within distance π produces exactly a |t|^{1/2} loss and half-order regularity shift relies on the non-trapping and asymptotically conic hypotheses together with the admissible condition; the manuscript must exhibit the precise propagation statement on the Legendre submanifold that converts multiplicity into the loss (presumably in the section containing the main dispersive estimate).
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the link Y = ∂X0 and the distance π should be introduced once with a forward reference to the geometric setup.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, main results paragraph] Abstract and main-results paragraph: the admissible condition on the Legendre submanifold is load-bearing for the exception at distance π, yet its precise definition, the verification that it is checkable from the geometry, and the proof that it eliminates the |t|^{1/2} loss are not supplied in the abstract; without these details the exception cannot be assessed as non-ad-hoc.

    Authors: The admissible condition is proposed and defined in the main body of the manuscript. We agree that the abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the condition to clarify the exception. In the revised manuscript, we will include a short description of the admissible condition in the abstract, along with a note that it is verifiable from the geometry. The full details and proof are contained in the subsequent sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main results / dispersive estimate section] The central claim that each multiplicity within distance π produces exactly a |t|^{1/2} loss and half-order regularity shift relies on the non-trapping and asymptotically conic hypotheses together with the admissible condition; the manuscript must exhibit the precise propagation statement on the Legendre submanifold that converts multiplicity into the loss (presumably in the section containing the main dispersive estimate).

    Authors: The propagation statement on the Legendre submanifold is stated explicitly in the main dispersive estimate theorem and the associated lemmas in the relevant section. We will revise the main results paragraph to include a direct reference to this statement, ensuring the conversion from multiplicity to the loss is clearly linked. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation grounded in geometric assumptions

full rationale

The paper classifies long-time dispersive decay rates for Schrödinger and wave equations on non-trapping asymptotically conic manifolds and cones in terms of conjugate point multiplicity on the link Y=∂X0. The central claims rest on standard geometric hypotheses (non-trapping, asymptotic conicity) plus a proposed admissible condition on the Legendre submanifold that removes loss in the distance-π case. No equations or results are shown to reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the admissible condition is presented as an independent, checkable restriction rather than an ansatz smuggled from prior work. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external geometric benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based solely on abstract; full text unavailable so ledger is minimal. The framework relies on standard properties of asymptotically conic manifolds and non-trapping assumptions, plus a newly proposed admissible condition on the Legendre submanifold.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Manifolds are non-trapping and asymptotically conic
    Stated in abstract as the setting for the classification
  • ad hoc to paper Wave propagation satisfies admissible condition on Legendre submanifold
    New condition proposed in abstract to avoid loss for certain conjugate pairs
invented entities (1)
  • admissible condition on Legendre submanifold no independent evidence
    purpose: To identify cases where conjugate point pairs at distance π cause no loss
    Introduced in abstract as a natural condition that prevents the expected loss

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5682 in / 1374 out tokens · 20796 ms · 2026-06-27T15:55:51.642813+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Local energy decay for several evolution equations on asymptotically Euclidean manifolds.Ann

    Jean-Fran¸cois Bony and Dietrich H¨ afner. Local energy decay for several evolution equations on asymptotically Euclidean manifolds.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 45(2):311–335, 2012. 2, 7

    2012

  2. [2]

    Sharp resolvent and time-decay estimates for dispersive equations on asymptotically Euclidean backgrounds.Duke Math

    Jean-Marc Bouclet and Nicolas Burq. Sharp resolvent and time-decay estimates for dispersive equations on asymptotically Euclidean backgrounds.Duke Math. J., 170(11):2575–2629, 2021. 2, 7, 9

    2021

  3. [3]

    Strichartz estimates for long range perturbations.Amer

    Jean-Marc Bouclet and Nikolay Tzvetkov. Strichartz estimates for long range perturbations.Amer. J. Math., 129(6):1565–1609, 2007. 9

    2007

  4. [4]

    ´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles

    Nicolas Burq, Patrick G´ erard, and Nikolay Tzvetkov. The Schr¨ odinger equation on a compact manifold: Strichartz estimates and applications. InJourn´ ees “ ´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles” (Plestin-les-Gr` eves, 2001), pages Exp. No. V, 18. Univ. Nantes, Nantes, 2001. 9

    2001

  5. [5]

    Damping oscillatory integrals.Invent

    Michael Cowling, Shaun Disney, Giancarlo Mauceri, and Detlef M¨ uller. Damping oscillatory integrals.Invent. Math., 101(2):237–260, 1990. 8

    1990

  6. [6]

    Mathematics: Theory & Applications

    Manfredo Perdig˜ ao do Carmo.Riemannian geometry. Mathematics: Theory & Applications. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1992. 89

    1992

  7. [7]

    J. J. Duistermaat and L H¨ ormander. Fourier integral operators. ii.Acta Mathematica, pages 183–269, 1972. 9

    1972

  8. [8]

    Fontelos, and Ana Primo

    Luca Fanelli, Veronica Felli, Marco A. Fontelos, and Ana Primo. Time decay of scaling critical electromagnetic Schr¨ odinger flows.Comm. Math. Phys., 324(3):1033–1067, 2013. 6

    2013

  9. [9]

    Propagation of singularities and Fredholm analysis of the time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03140, 2022

    Jesse Gell-Redman, Sean Gomes, and Andrew Hassell. Propagation of singularities and Fredholm analysis of the time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03140, 2022. 25

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Ginibre and G

    J. Ginibre and G. Velo. Generalized Strichartz inequalities for the wave equation.J. Funct. Anal., 133(1):50–68,

  11. [11]

    Dispersive equations on asymptotically conical manifolds: time decay in the low-frequency regime.Ann

    Viviana Grasselli. Dispersive equations on asymptotically conical manifolds: time decay in the low-frequency regime.Ann. Global Anal. Geom., 63(2):Paper No. 17, 43, 2023. 7

    2023

  12. [12]

    Resolvent at low energy and Riesz transform for Schr¨ odinger operators on asymptotically conic manifolds

    Colin Guillarmou and Andrew Hassell. Resolvent at low energy and Riesz transform for Schr¨ odinger operators on asymptotically conic manifolds. I.Math. Ann., 341(4):859–896, 2008. 9, 10, 13

    2008

  13. [13]

    Uniform sobolev estimates for non-trapping metrics.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 13(3):599–632, 2014

    Colin Guillarmou and Andrew Hassell. Uniform sobolev estimates for non-trapping metrics.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 13(3):599–632, 2014. 32

    2014

  14. [14]

    Resolvent at low energy III: The spectral measure.Trans

    Colin Guillarmou, Andrew Hassell, and Adam Sikora. Resolvent at low energy III: The spectral measure.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 365(11):6103–6148, 2013. 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 32, 39, 40

    2013

  15. [15]

    Restriction and spectral multiplier theorems on asymp- totically conic manifolds.Anal

    Colin Guillarmou, Andrew Hassell, and Adam Sikora. Restriction and spectral multiplier theorems on asymp- totically conic manifolds.Anal. PDE, 6(4):893–950, 2013. 8, 9, 10, 13, 26, 29, 32, 35, 39, 40, 42, 44, 46

    2013

  16. [16]

    Guillemin

    V. Guillemin. Sojourn times and asymptotic properties of the scattering matrix.Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 12(suppl):69–88, 1976/77. 25

    1976

  17. [17]

    Guillemin and G

    V. Guillemin and G. Uhlmann. Oscillatory integrals with singular symbols.Duke Math. J., 48(1):251–267, 1981. 9

    1981

  18. [18]

    The scattering map for the Schrodinger operator on curved spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20225, 2026

    Andrew Hassell and Qiuye Jia. The scattering map for the Schr¨ odinger operator on curved spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20225, 2026. 51 GEOMETRIC FOCUSING AND DISPERSIVE ESTIMATES 93

    work page arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    A Strichartz inequality for the Schr¨ odinger equation on non- trapping asymptotically conic manifolds.Comm

    Andrew Hassell, Terence Tao, and Jared Wunsch. A Strichartz inequality for the Schr¨ odinger equation on non- trapping asymptotically conic manifolds.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 30(1-3):157–205, 2005. 58

    2005

  20. [20]

    Sharp Strichartz estimates on nontrapping asymptotically conic manifolds.Amer

    Andrew Hassell, Terence Tao, and Jared Wunsch. Sharp Strichartz estimates on nontrapping asymptotically conic manifolds.Amer. J. Math., 128(4):963–1024, 2006. 9

    2006

  21. [21]

    The spectral projections and the resolvent for scattering metrics.Journal d’Analyse Mathematique, 79:241–298, 1999

    Andrew Hassell and Andr´ as Vasy. The spectral projections and the resolvent for scattering metrics.Journal d’Analyse Mathematique, 79:241–298, 1999. 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 40, 49

    1999

  22. [22]

    The resolvent for laplace-type operators on asymptotically conic spaces

    Andrew Hassell and Andr´ as Vasy. The resolvent for laplace-type operators on asymptotically conic spaces. Annales de l’institut Fourier, 51(5):1299–1346, 2001. 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 19, 22, 25, 27

    2001

  23. [23]

    The Schr¨ odinger propagator for scattering metrics.Annals of Mathematics, pages 487–523, 2005

    Andrew Hassell and Jared Wunsch. The Schr¨ odinger propagator for scattering metrics.Annals of Mathematics, pages 487–523, 2005. 9

    2005

  24. [24]

    The semiclassical resolvent and the propagator for non-trapping scattering metrics.Adv

    Andrew Hassell and Jared Wunsch. The semiclassical resolvent and the propagator for non-trapping scattering metrics.Adv. Math., 217(2):586–682, 2008. 7, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 39, 40, 50, 59

    2008

  25. [25]

    Global-in-time strichartz estimates on nontrapping, asymptotically conic manifolds.Analysis & PDE, 9(1):151–192, 2016

    Andrew Hassell and Junyong Zhang. Global-in-time strichartz estimates on nontrapping, asymptotically conic manifolds.Analysis & PDE, 9(1):151–192, 2016. 9, 13, 14, 24, 26, 32, 48, 62, 71, 72, 75, 85

    2016

  26. [26]

    Fourier integral operators

    Lars H¨ ormander. Fourier integral operators. I.Acta Mathematica, 127(none):79 – 183, 1971. 9, 48

    1971

  27. [27]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2003

    Lars H¨ ormander.The analysis of linear partial differential operators I: Distribution theory and Fourier analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, 2003. 66

    2003

  28. [28]

    Springer,

    Lars H¨ ormander.The analysis of linear partial differential operators IV: Fourier integral operators. Springer,

  29. [29]

    Dispersion for the wave equation outside a cylinder inR 3.J

    Felice Iandoli and Oana Ivanovici. Dispersion for the wave equation outside a cylinder inR 3.J. Funct. Anal., 286(9):Paper No. 110377, 50, 2024. 9

    2024

  30. [30]

    Determining metrics from the scattering map of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation

    Qiuye Jia. Determining metrics from the scattering map of the time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.20160, 2026. 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Pointwise dispersive estimates for schrodinger and wave equations in a conical singular space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16029, 2024

    Qiuye Jia and Junyong Zhang. Pointwise dispersive estimates for schrodinger and wave equations in a conical singular space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16029, 2024. 4, 5, 6, 8

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Strichartz estimates for the schr¨ odinger equation in high dimensional critical electromagnetic fields.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02296, 2024

    Qiuye Jia and Junyong Zhang. Strichartz estimates for the schr¨ odinger equation in high dimensional critical electromagnetic fields.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02296, 2024. 4

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Decay and Strichartz estimates for critical electromagnetic wave equations on conic manifolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09635, 2025

    Qiuye Jia and Junyong Zhang. Decay and Strichartz estimates for critical electromagnetic wave equations on conic manifolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09635, 2025. 4

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994

    Mark S Joshi.A precision calculus of paired Lagrangian distributions. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994. 9

    1994

  35. [35]

    L. V. Kapitanski˘ i. Estimates for norms in Besov and Lizorkin-Triebel spaces for solutions of second-order linear hyperbolic equations.Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI), 171:106–162, 185–186,

  36. [36]

    Endpoint Strichartz estimates.Amer

    Markus Keel and Terence Tao. Endpoint Strichartz estimates.Amer. J. Math., 120(5):955–980, 1998. 9

    1998

  37. [37]

    Dispersive estimates for principally normal pseudodifferential operators.Comm

    Herbert Koch and Daniel Tataru. Dispersive estimates for principally normal pseudodifferential operators.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58(2):217–284, 2005. 2

    2005

  38. [38]

    Damping oscillatory integrals of convex analytic functions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15492, 2025

    Sanghyuk Lee and Sewook Oh. Damping oscillatory integrals of convex analytic functions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15492, 2025. 8

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    R. B. Melrose and G. A. Uhlmann. Lagrangian intersection and the Cauchy problem.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 32(4):483–519, 1979. 9

    1979

  40. [40]

    Scattering metrics and geodesic flow at infinity.Inventiones Mathematicae, 124(1):389–436, 1996

    Richard Melrose and Maciej Zworski. Scattering metrics and geodesic flow at infinity.Inventiones Mathematicae, 124(1):389–436, 1996. 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 15, 18, 22, 25, 49, 55

    1996

  41. [41]

    Melrose.The Atiyah-Patodi-Singer index theorem, volume 4 ofResearch Notes in Mathematics

    Richard B. Melrose.The Atiyah-Patodi-Singer index theorem, volume 4 ofResearch Notes in Mathematics. A K Peters, Ltd., Wellesley, MA, 1993. 9, 10

    1993

  42. [42]

    Richard B. Melrose. Spectral and scattering theory for the Laplacian on asymptotically Euclidian spaces. In Spectral and scattering theory (Sanda, 1992), volume 161 ofLecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math., pages 85–130. Dekker, New York, 1994. 3, 9

    1992

  43. [43]

    Melrose.Geometric scattering theory

    Richard B. Melrose.Geometric scattering theory. Stanford Lectures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

  44. [44]

    On some estimates for the wave equation inL p andH p.J

    Akihiko Miyachi. On some estimates for the wave equation inL p andH p.J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math., 27(2):331–354, 1980. 9

    1980

  45. [45]

    Gerd Mockenhaupt, Andreas Seeger, and Christopher D. Sogge. Local smoothing of Fourier integral operators and Carleson-Sj¨ olin estimates.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 6(1):65–130, 1993. 9

    1993

  46. [46]

    Peral.L p estimates for the wave equation.J

    Juan C. Peral.L p estimates for the wave equation.J. Functional Analysis, 36(1):114–145, 1980. 9

    1980

  47. [47]

    Low frequency asymptotics and local energy decay for the Schr¨ odinger equation.J

    Julien Royer. Low frequency asymptotics and local energy decay for the Schr¨ odinger equation.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 27(8):3149–3190, 2025. 2, 7, 9

    2025

  48. [48]

    W. Schlag. On pointwise decay of waves.J. Math. Phys., 62(6):Paper No. 061509, 27, 2021. 2 94 QIUYE JIA AND JUNYONG ZHANG

    2021

  49. [49]

    Sogge, and Elias M

    Andreas Seeger, Christopher D. Sogge, and Elias M. Stein. Regularity properties of Fourier integral operators. Ann. of Math. (2), 134(2):231–251, 1991. 9

    1991

  50. [50]

    Hart F. Smith. A parametrix construction for wave equations withC 1,1 coefficients.Ann. Inst. Fourier (Greno- ble), 48(3):797–835, 1998. 9

    1998

  51. [51]

    Sogge and Elias M

    Christopher D. Sogge and Elias M. Stein. Averages of functions over hypersurfaces inR n.Invent. Math., 82(3):543–556, 1985. 8

    1985

  52. [52]

    Strichartz estimates for a Schr¨ odinger operator with nonsmooth coefficients

    Gigliola Staffilani and Daniel Tataru. Strichartz estimates for a Schr¨ odinger operator with nonsmooth coefficients. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 27(7-8):1337–1372, 2002. 9

    2002

  53. [53]

    Stein.Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality, and oscillatory integrals, volume 43 of Princeton Mathematical Series

    Elias M. Stein.Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality, and oscillatory integrals, volume 43 of Princeton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993. With the assistance of Timothy S. Murphy, Monographs in Harmonic Analysis, III. 67

    1993

  54. [54]

    Dispersive estimates and optimality for Schr¨ odinger equations on product cones.Forum Math., 38(4):1043–1059, 2026

    Kouichi Taira. Dispersive estimates and optimality for Schr¨ odinger equations on product cones.Forum Math., 38(4):1043–1059, 2026. 7

    2026

  55. [55]

    Strichartz estimates for second order hyperbolic operators with nonsmooth coefficients

    Daniel Tataru. Strichartz estimates for second order hyperbolic operators with nonsmooth coefficients. II.Amer. J. Math., 123(3):385–423, 2001. 9

    2001

  56. [56]

    Strichartz estimates for second order hyperbolic operators with nonsmooth coefficients

    Daniel Tataru. Strichartz estimates for second order hyperbolic operators with nonsmooth coefficients. III.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 15(2):419–442, 2002. 9

    2002

  57. [57]

    Parametrices and dispersive estimates for Schr¨ odinger operators with variable coefficients.Amer

    Daniel Tataru. Parametrices and dispersive estimates for Schr¨ odinger operators with variable coefficients.Amer. J. Math., 130(3):571–634, 2008. 2

    2008

  58. [58]

    Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces.Pure Appl

    Andr´ as Vasy. Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces.Pure Appl. Anal., 3(1):1–74, 2021. 11

    2021

  59. [59]

    Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces, a Lagrangian approach.Comm

    Andr´ as Vasy. Resolvent near zero energy on Riemannian scattering (asymptotically conic) spaces, a Lagrangian approach.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 46(5):823–863, 2021. 11

    2021

  60. [60]

    Distribution of resonances for asymptotically Euclidean manifolds.Journal of Differential Geometry, 55(1):43–82, 2000

    Jared Wunsch and Maciej Zworski. Distribution of resonances for asymptotically Euclidean manifolds.Journal of Differential Geometry, 55(1):43–82, 2000. 14

    2000

  61. [61]

    Strichartz estimates and nonlinear wave equation on nontrapping asymptotically conic manifolds

    Junyong Zhang. Strichartz estimates and nonlinear wave equation on nontrapping asymptotically conic manifolds. Adv. Math., 271:91–111, 2015. 9 Mathematical Sciences Institute, the Australian National University; Email address:Qiuye.Jia@anu.edu.au; Junyong Zhang Department of Mathematics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 Email address:zhang ...

    2015