Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 71 references

Quantum-geometric origin of superfluid weight in quasicrystals with critical states

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Superfluid weight in quasicrystals with critical states arises mainly from quantum geometric effects.

desk verdict The paper finds geometric contribution dominates superfluid weight in quasicrystals with critical states by subtracting real-space total from momentum-space conventional term, but the separation step for multifractal states is the part that needs explicit validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.09989 v1 pith:SHF5KKWS submitted 2026-06-08 cond-mat.supr-con

Kazuma Saito , Ryo Okugawa , Yusuke Kato , Takami Tohyama This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superfluidweightquasicrystalscriticalstatesquantumgeometrysuperconductivityquasiperiodicsystemsgeometriccontributionzerotemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quasiperiodic systems often host critical states that sit between extended and localized behavior. The paper calculates the superfluid weight in such systems at zero temperature by using both real-space and momentum-space methods to isolate the usual kinetic contribution from the quantum geometric one. It shows that the geometric contribution dominates the total superfluid weight when critical states are present. This points to a direct connection between the fractal-like nature of critical states and enhanced superconducting properties in aperiodic lattices.

What carries the argument

Separation of conventional and quantum geometric contributions to superfluid weight using real-space and momentum-space calculations in quasicrystals.

What would settle it

A direct computation in a model quasicrystal where the conventional contribution to superfluid weight exceeds the geometric one despite the presence of critical states would falsify the dominance claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In quasiperiodic systems with critical states, the superfluid weight at zero temperature is dominated by the geometric contribution rather than the conventional band contribution, as determined by separating these terms through real-space and momentum-space approaches.

Load-bearing premise

The real-space and momentum-space approaches correctly separate the conventional and quantum geometric contributions to superfluid weight in systems with critical states at zero temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Superconductivity persists or strengthens in quasicrystals due to geometric effects tied to critical states.
  • The dominance holds specifically at zero temperature in systems with neither extended nor localized states.
  • This reveals an interplay where critical states boost the geometric part of superfluid density.
  • Quasiperiodic potentials lead to different superconducting mechanisms than periodic crystals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar geometric dominance might appear in other aperiodic systems like amorphous materials.
  • Finite temperature effects could reduce the geometric contribution if thermal fluctuations disrupt critical states.
  • Designing quasicrystal superconductors might focus on enhancing quantum geometry rather than band flatness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the superfluid weight at zero temperature in quasiperiodic systems hosting critical states. It employs both real-space and momentum-space formulations to separate the conventional (Bloch-like) and quantum-geometric contributions, reporting that the geometric term dominates the total superfluid weight in these systems.

Significance. The dual real-space/momentum-space methodology is a clear strength that enables explicit separation of the two contributions. If the separation remains valid for multifractal states, the result would establish a direct link between quantum geometry and superconductivity in aperiodic lattices, extending known periodic-system results and motivating further study of geometric effects in quasicrystals.

major comments (2)
  1. [momentum-space approach (results section)] The central claim that the geometric contribution dominates rests on the momentum-space method correctly isolating the conventional term while the real-space method supplies the total. The manuscript must demonstrate that the two methods agree on the conventional contribution (or on the extracted geometric remainder) for at least one representative Hamiltonian with critical states; without this cross-check the reported dominance does not follow.
  2. [definition of quantum metric (methods)] The quantum metric in the momentum-space formulation is defined via k-derivatives. For critical states lacking Bloch character and possessing multifractal statistics, this definition requires a non-standard generalization whose accuracy is not validated; the paper should supply an explicit test or error estimate for this step, as it is load-bearing for the separation.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states the finding but does not name the specific quasiperiodic model or lattice; adding one sentence would improve clarity.
  2. Notation for the conventional versus geometric superfluid-weight terms should be introduced once and used consistently across real-space and momentum-space sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the detailed comments. We respond point by point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [momentum-space approach (results section)] The central claim that the geometric contribution dominates rests on the momentum-space method correctly isolating the conventional term while the real-space method supplies the total. The manuscript must demonstrate that the two methods agree on the conventional contribution (or on the extracted geometric remainder) for at least one representative Hamiltonian with critical states; without this cross-check the reported dominance does not follow.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit cross-validation of the conventional contribution between the two formulations would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct numerical comparison for the Aubry-André model at criticality, computing the conventional term both from the momentum-space expression and by isolating it within the real-space total via a controlled periodic approximation; the two will be shown to agree within the reported numerical precision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [definition of quantum metric (methods)] The quantum metric in the momentum-space formulation is defined via k-derivatives. For critical states lacking Bloch character and possessing multifractal statistics, this definition requires a non-standard generalization whose accuracy is not validated; the paper should supply an explicit test or error estimate for this step, as it is load-bearing for the separation.

    Authors: The momentum-space quantum metric employs a generalization constructed from the Fourier components of the critical eigenstates over an effective Brillouin zone. We will augment the methods section with an explicit validation: for representative system sizes we compare the k-derivative quantum metric against an independent real-space estimate obtained from the position-operator matrix elements of the same states, and report the relative discrepancy as a function of system size to quantify the accuracy of the generalization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; computational separation of contributions is independent of the reported dominance

full rationale

The paper reports a numerical finding obtained by applying two distinct methods (real-space and momentum-space) to compute superfluid weight and then subtracting to isolate the geometric term. No equation in the provided abstract or description reduces the geometric dominance to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the separation is presented as an external computational procedure whose validity is an assumption rather than a tautology. The central claim therefore remains a falsifiable output of the calculation rather than an input renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities is present in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum-geometric origin of superfluid weight in quasicrystals with critical states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SHF5KKWS

@misc{pith2026260609989,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum-geometric origin of superfluid weight in quasicrystals with critical states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SHF5KKWS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.09989}
}
read the original abstract

A distinctive feature of many quasiperiodic systems is the presence of critical states that are neither extended nor exponentially localized. We investigate the geometric effect on the superfluid weight in quasiperiodic systems with critical states at zero temperature. We employ both real-space and momentum-space approaches to superfluid weight in quasicrystals, which allows us to separate the conventional and quantum geometric contributions. We find that the superfluid weight is dominated by the geometric contribution in quasiperiodic systems with critical states. This finding reveals a fundamental interplay between superconductivity and critical states in quasicrystals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09989 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The Ammann-Beenker quasicrystal with 2827 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Evolution of the energy spectrum of the AAH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys.76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  2. [2]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  3. [3]

    Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, Eur

    R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, Eur. Phys. J. B79, 121 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    Rossi, Quantum metric and correlated states in two- dimensional systems, Curr

    E. Rossi, Quantum metric and correlated states in two- dimensional systems, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 25, 100952 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    T¨ orm¨ a, S

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconduc- tivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 528 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Yanase, Nonreciprocal Transport and Optical Phenomena in Quantum Materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Mater. Phys.15, 63 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nat. Commun.6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Julku, S

    A. Julku, S. Peotta, T. I. Vanhala, D.-H. Kim, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Geometric Origin of Superfluidity in the Lieb- Lattice Flat Band, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 045303 (2016)

    2016

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Tovmasyan, S

    M. Tovmasyan, S. Peotta, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and S. D. Huber, Effective theory and emergent SU(2) symmetry in the flat bands of attractive Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. B 94, 245149 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Band geometry, Berry curvature, and super- fluid weight, Phys. Rev. B95, 024515 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Liang, S

    L. Liang, S. Peotta, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Wave- packet dynamics of Bogoliubov quasiparticles: Quantum metric effects, Phys. Rev. B96, 064511 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    T¨ orm¨ a, L

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, L. Liang, and S. Peotta, Quantum metric and effective mass of a two-body bound state in a flat band, Phys. Rev. B98, 220511 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    X. Hu, T. Hyart, D. I. Pikulin, and E. Rossi, Geo- metric and Conventional Contribution to the Superfluid Weight in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237002 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Julku, T

    A. Julku, T. J. Peltonen, L. Liang, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluid weight and Berezinskii- Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature of twisted bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B101, 060505 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    F. Xie, Z. Song, B. Lian, and B. A. Bernevig, Topology-Bounded Superfluid Weight in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 167002 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, V

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, V. Peri, F. Schindler, S. D. Hu- ber, and B. A. Bernevig, Superfluid Weight Bounds from Symmetry and Quantum Geometry in Flat Bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 087002 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Kitamura, T

    T. Kitamura, T. Yamashita, J. Ishizuka, A. Daido, and Y. Yanase, Superconductivity in monolayer FeSe en- hanced by quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023232 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Kitamura, A

    T. Kitamura, A. Daido, and Y. Yanase, Quantum geo- metric effect on Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov super- conductivity, Phys. Rev. B106, 184507 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    A. Lau, S. Peotta, D. I. Pikulin, E. Rossi, and T. Hyart, Universal suppression of superfluid weight by non- magnetic disorder ins-wave superconductors indepen- dent of quantum geometry and band dispersion, SciPost Phys.13, 086 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Huhtinen, J

    K.-E. Huhtinen, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, B. A. 5 Bernevig, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Revisiting flat band supercon- ductivity: Dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings, Phys. Rev. B106, 014518 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Mao and D

    D. Mao and D. Chowdhury, Diamagnetic response and phase stiffness for interacting isolated narrow bands, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.120, e2217816120 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Kitamura, S

    T. Kitamura, S. Kanasugi, M. Chazono, and Y. Yanase, Quantum geometry induced anapole superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B107, 214513 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Porlles and W

    D. Porlles and W. Chen, Quantum geometry of singlet superconductors, Phys. Rev. B108, 094508 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Kitamura, A

    T. Kitamura, A. Daido, and Y. Yanase, Spin-Triplet Su- perconductivity from Quantum-Geometry-Induced Fer- romagnetic Fluctuation, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036001 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    S. A. Chen and K. T. Law, Ginzburg-Landau Theory of Flat-Band Superconductors with Quantum Metric, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 026002 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Mao and D

    D. Mao and D. Chowdhury, Upper bounds on supercon- ducting and excitonic phase stiffness for interacting iso- lated narrow bands, Phys. Rev. B109, 024507 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Daido, T

    A. Daido, T. Kitamura, and Y. Yanase, Quantum geome- try encoded to pair potentials, Phys. Rev. B110, 094505 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    J.-X. Hu, S. A. Chen, and K. T. Law, Anomalous co- herence length in superconductors with quantum metric, Commun. Phys.8, 20 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Porlles and W

    D. Porlles and W. Chen, Quantum geometric origin of the Meissner effect and superfluid weight marker, Phys. Rev. B , (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Tanaka, J

    M. Tanaka, J. ˆI.-j. Wang, T. H. Dinh, D. Rodan-Legrain, S. Zaman, M. Hays, A. Almanakly, B. Kannan, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, J. A. Grover, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and W. D. Oliver, Superfl...

    2025

  23. [31]

    Hirobe, T

    Y. Hirobe, T. Kitamura, and Y. Yanase, Anomalous Temperature Dependence of Quantum-Geometric Super- fluid Weight, arXiv:2505.13065 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Shechtman, I

    D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J. W. Cahn, Metallic Phase with Long-Range Orientational Order and No Translational Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1951 (1984)

    1951

  26. [34]

    Levine and P

    D. Levine and P. J. Steinhardt, Quasicrystals. I. Defini- tion and structure, Phys. Rev. B34, 596 (1986)

    1986

  27. [35]

    Sakai, N

    S. Sakai, N. Takemori, A. Koga, and R. Arita, Super- conductivity on a quasiperiodic lattice: Extended-to- localized crossover of Cooper pairs, Phys. Rev. B95, 024509 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    R. N. Ara´ ujo and E. C. Andrade, Conventional super- conductivity in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B100, 014510 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Sakai and R

    S. Sakai and R. Arita, Exotic pairing state in quasicrys- talline superconductors under a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 022002 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Takemori, R

    N. Takemori, R. Arita, and S. Sakai, Physical properties of weak-coupling quasiperiodic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B102, 115108 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Y. Cao, Y. Zhang, Y.-B. Liu, C.-C. Liu, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, Kohn-Luttinger Mechanism Driven Exotic Topological Superconductivity on the Penrose Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 017002 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Y.-B. Liu, J. Zhou, and F. Yang, Nematic Superconduc- tivity and Its Critical Vestigial Phases in the Quasicrys- tal, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136002 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Saito, M

    K. Saito, M. Hori, R. Okugawa, K. Tanaka, and T. To- hyama, Gapless superconductivity and its real-space topology in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L022077 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Kamiya, K.and Takeuchi, N

    T. Kamiya, K.and Takeuchi, N. Kabeya, N. Wada, T. Ishimasa, A. Ochiai, K. Deguchi, K. Imura, and N. K. Sato, Discovery of superconductivity in quasicrystal, Nat. Commun.9, 154 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Tokumoto, K

    Y. Tokumoto, K. Hamano, S. Nakagawa, Y. Kamimura, S. Suzuki, R. Tamura, and K. Edagawa, Superconductiv- ity in a van der Waals layered quasicrystal, Nat. Com- mun.15, 1529 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Terashima, Y

    T. Terashima, Y. Tokumoto, K. Hamano, T. Konoike, N. Kikugawa, and K. Edagawa, Anomalous upper criti- cal field in the quasicrystal superconductor Ta 1.6Te, npj Quantum Materials9, 56 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Ostlund, R

    S. Ostlund, R. Pandit, D. Rand, H. J. Schellnhuber, and E. D. Siggia, One-Dimensional Schr¨ odinger Equa- tion with an Almost Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1873 (1983)

    1983

  38. [46]

    Tsunetsugu, T

    H. Tsunetsugu, T. Fujiwara, K. Ueda, and T. Tokihiro, Eigenstates in 2-Dimensional Penrose Tiling, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.55, 1420 (1986)

    1986

  39. [47]

    Sutherland, Self-similar ground-state wave function for electrons on a two-dimensional Penrose lattice, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Self-similar ground-state wave function for electrons on a two-dimensional Penrose lattice, Phys. Rev. B34, 3904 (1986)

    1986

  40. [48]

    Sutherland, Critical electronic wave functions on quasiperiodic lattices: Exact calculation of fractal mea- sures, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Critical electronic wave functions on quasiperiodic lattices: Exact calculation of fractal mea- sures, Phys. Rev. B35, 9529 (1987)

    1987

  41. [49]

    Tokihiro, T

    T. Tokihiro, T. Fujiwara, and M. Arai, Exact eigenstates on a two-dimensional Penrose lattice and their fractal dimensions, Phys. Rev. B38, 5981 (1988)

    1988

  42. [50]

    Tsunetsugu, T

    H. Tsunetsugu, T. Fujiwara, K. Ueda, and T. Tokihiro, Electronic properties of the Penrose lattice. I. Energy spectrum and wave functions, Phys. Rev. B43, 8879 (1991)

    1991

  43. [51]

    Tsunetsugu and K

    H. Tsunetsugu and K. Ueda, Electronic properties of the Penrose lattice. II. Conductance at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. B43, 8892 (1991)

    1991

  44. [52]

    J. Sun, H. Guo, and B.-J. Yang, Geometric Superfluid Weight in Quasicrystals (2025), arXiv:2507.20540 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2025

  45. [53]

    Liu, J.-J

    Y.-B. Liu, J.-J. Hao, Y. Zhang, Y. Cao, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, Cooper instability and superconductivity of the Penrose lattice, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 287411 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Liu, Z.-Y

    Y.-B. Liu, Z.-Y. Shao, Y. Cao, and F. Yang, Unconven- tional superfluidity of superconductivity on Penrose lat- tice, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron.66, 290312 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Fukushima, N

    T. Fukushima, N. Takemori, S. Sakai, M. Ichioka, and A. Jagannathan, Supercurrent distribution in real-space and anomalous paramagnetic response in a supercon- ducting quasicrystal, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043164 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    See Supplemental Material at

  49. [57]

    Hu and W

    Y.-J. Hu and W. Huang, Quantum geometric superfluid weight in multiband superconductors: A microscopic in- terpretation, Phys. Rev. B111, 134511 (2025). 6

    2025

  50. [58]

    Ghadimi, T

    R. Ghadimi, T. Sugimoto, K. Tanaka, and T. To- hyama, Topological superconductivity in quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B104, 144511 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Mac´ e, A

    N. Mac´ e, A. Jagannathan, P. Kalugin, R. Mosseri, and F. Pi´ echon, Critical eigenstates and their properties in one- and two-dimensional quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B96, 045138 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Koga, Superlattice structure in the antiferromag- netically ordered state in the Hubbard model on the Ammann-Beenker tiling, Phys

    A. Koga, Superlattice structure in the antiferromag- netically ordered state in the Hubbard model on the Ammann-Beenker tiling, Phys. Rev. B102, 115125 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    M. O. Oktel, Strictly localized states in the octago- nal Ammann-Beenker quasicrystal, Phys. Rev. B104, 014204 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Grimm and M

    U. Grimm and M. Schreiber,Energy spectra and eigen- states of quasiperiodic tight-binding Hamiltonians, in Quasicrystals— Structure and Physical Properties, edited by H.-R. Trebin(Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003)

    2003

  55. [63]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Analyticity breaking and Ander- son localization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc.3, 18 (1980)

    1980

  56. [64]

    P. G. Harper, Single Band Motion of Conduction Elec- trons in a Uniform Magnetic Field, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  57. [65]

    Purkayastha, S

    A. Purkayastha, S. Sanyal, A. Dhar, and M. Kulkarni, Anomalous transport in the Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper model in isolated and open systems, Phys. Rev. B97, 174206 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    Sakai, R

    S. Sakai, R. Arita, and T. Ohtsuki, Quantum phase tran- sition between hyperuniform density distributions, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033241 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Wang, C.-K

    Y.-P. Wang, C.-K. Chang, R. Okugawa, and C.-H. Hsu, Quasiperiodicity-induced bulk localization with self- similarity in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043353 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    Fraxanet, U

    J. Fraxanet, U. Bhattacharya, T. Grass, M. Lewenstein, and A. Dauphin, Localization and multifractal proper- ties of the long-range Kitaev chain in the presence of an Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper modulation, Phys. Rev. B106, 024204 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Zhang and M

    X. Zhang and M. S. Foster, Enhanced amplitude for su- perconductivity due to spectrum-wide wave function crit- icality in quasiperiodic and power-law random hopping models, Phys. Rev. B106, L180503 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Viebahn, M

    K. Viebahn, M. Sbroscia, E. Carter, J.-C. Yu, and U. Schneider, Matter-Wave Diffraction from a Quasicrys- talline Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 110404 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    Sbroscia, K

    M. Sbroscia, K. Viebahn, E. Carter, J.-C. Yu, A. Gaunt, and U. Schneider, Observing Localization in a 2D Qua- sicrystalline Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 200604 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.