pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10169 · v1 · pith:CWH2AGRBnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 💻 cs.GT

Benchmark-Tight Approximation Ratio of Simple Mechanism for a Unit-Demand Buyer

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 14:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GT
keywords revenue maximizationunit-demand buyeritem pricingapproximation ratioduality relaxation benchmarkprophet inequalitymechanism designsimple mechanisms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing achieves a tight 3-approximation to the Duality Relaxation Benchmark for unit-demand buyers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a particular item pricing rule approximates optimal revenue within a factor of exactly 3 for one buyer who wants at most one item. It reaches this ratio by comparing the mechanism directly to the Duality Relaxation Benchmark rather than routing through Myerson Auction as an intermediate step. The proof rests on a new benchmark-based 3-competitive prophet inequality that is shown to be fully constructive. An impossibility result shows that the single-dimensional representative method cannot improve beyond 3 for many item pricings.

Core claim

Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing guarantees a tight 3-approximation to the Duality Relaxation Benchmark. All earlier analyses obtained only a 4-approximation because Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing is a tight 2-approximation to Myerson Auction and Myerson Auction is a tight 2-approximation to the benchmark; bypassing Myerson Auction removes one factor of 2. The new argument relies on a benchmark-based 3-competitive prophet inequality together with its constructive proof that directly yields the pricing rule.

What carries the argument

The benchmark-based 3-competitive prophet inequality whose constructive proof directly produces the Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing rule.

If this is right

  • The same pricing rule yields a revenue guarantee of 3 against the benchmark for any unit-demand instance.
  • The approach extends to other multi-item settings whose optimal revenue is relaxed to accessible benchmarks.
  • Any mechanism that follows the single-dimensional representative method cannot improve the ratio beyond 3 against the benchmark for a large class of item pricings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The constructive prophet inequality may be reusable in other mechanism-design problems that compare simple mechanisms to relaxation benchmarks.
  • Beating the ratio of 3 will require techniques that go beyond the single-dimensional representative approach.

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark-based 3-competitive prophet inequality holds and admits a fully constructive proof that directly supports the item pricing mechanism without intermediate steps.

What would settle it

A valuation distribution on which the revenue collected by Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing is strictly less than one-third the value of the Duality Relaxation Benchmark.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10169 by Pinyan Lu, Yaonan Jin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A diagram of the previous results and our new results. The four mechanisms constitute a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Diagrams of revenue-quantile curves, virtual value CDF’s, and “ironing” [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Diagram of Case 3 in the proof of Lemma 2.6, in terms of revenue-quantile curves. ≤ max  φ(2)(v(2)), ve1, v(3), . . . , v(n)  = DRB(ve1, v−1) Case 2: ve1 ≻ v(2) ≻ v1. I.e., v1 is not the highest value in (v1, v−1) but ve1 is the highest value in (ve1, v−1). As mentioned in Section 2.1, an ironed virtual value is always upper bounded by the corresponding value φ(2)(v(2)) ≤ v(2). Thus for any choice of q1 … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The Iron reduction. (a) input non-concave revenue-quantile curves (b) output concave revenue-quantile curves (c) input badly-defined virtual value CDF’s (d) output well-defined virtual value CDF’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Diagrams of Iron with revenue-quantile curves and virtual value CDF’s. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The Truncate reduction. (a) input untruncated virtual value CDF’s (b) output truncated virtual value CDF’s (c) input untruncated revenue-quantile curves (d) output truncated revenue-quantile curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diagrams of Truncate with virtual value CDF’s and revenue-quantile curves. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The Extend reduction. (a) input truncated revenue-quantile curves (b) output semi-linear revenue-quantile curves (c) input truncated virtual value CDF’s (d) output semi-linear virtual value CDF’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Diagrams of Extend with virtual value CDF’s and revenue-quantile curves. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The Scale reduction. (a) input semi-linear revenue-quantile curves (b) output semi-linear revenue-quantile curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Diagrams of Scale with revenue-quantile curves. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The Perturb reduction. (a) input semi-linear revenue-quantile curves (b) “positive” linear revenue-quantile curves (c) “negative” linear revenue-quantile curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Diagrams of the Perturb reduction with revenue-quantile curves. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study revenue maximization in the unit-demand single-buyer setting. Our main result is that \textsf{Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing} guarantees a {\em tight} $3$-approximation to the \textsf{Duality Relaxation Benchmark} [Chawla-Malec-Sivan, EC'10/GEB'15; Cai-Devanur-Weinberg, STOC'16/ SICOMP'21], breaking the barrier of $4$ since [Chawla-Hartline-Malec-Sivan, STOC'10; Chawla-Malec-Sivan, EC'10/GEB'15]. To our knowledge, this is the first {\em benchmark-tight} revenue guarantee of any simple multi-item mechanism. Technically, all previous works employ \textsf{Myerson Auction} as an intermediary. The barrier of $4$ follows as \textsf{Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing} achieves a {\em tight} $2$-approximation to \textsf{Myerson Auction}, which then achieves a {\em tight} $2$-approximation to \textsf{Duality Relaxation Benchmark}. Instead, our new approach avoids \textsf{Myerson Auction}, thus enabling the improvement. Central to our work are a {\em benchmark-based} $3$-competitive prophet inequality and its {\em fully constructive} proof. Such variant prophet inequalities shall find future applications, e.g., to Multi-Item Mechanism Design where optimal revenues are relaxed to various more accessible benchmarks. We complement our benchmark-tight ratio with an impossibility result. All previous works and ours follow the {\em single-dimensional representative} approach introduced by [Chawla-Hartline-Kleinberg, EC'07]. Against \textsf{Duality Relaxation Benchmark}, it turns out that this approach cannot beat our bound of $3$ for a large class of \textsf{Item Pricing}'s.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing achieves a tight 3-approximation to the Duality Relaxation Benchmark in the unit-demand single-buyer revenue maximization setting. This improves on the prior 4-approximation barrier by developing a benchmark-based 3-competitive prophet inequality with a fully constructive proof that directly yields the item pricing mechanism without routing through Myerson Auction as an intermediary. The paper also establishes an impossibility result showing that the single-dimensional representative approach cannot improve on 3 for a large class of item pricings against the benchmark.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result is significant as the first benchmark-tight revenue guarantee achieved by any simple multi-item mechanism. The constructive benchmark-based prophet inequality is a strength that may enable future applications in multi-item mechanism design where revenues are relaxed to accessible benchmarks rather than optimal mechanisms.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly contrast the new benchmark-based prophet inequality with prior prophet inequalities used in mechanism design to highlight the technical departure.
  2. [Impossibility section] In the impossibility result, the precise class of item pricings for which 3 cannot be beaten should be stated with a formal definition or reference to a specific theorem number.
  3. [§3] Notation for virtual values and ironing in the Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing definition would benefit from an inline example or diagram for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on independent prophet inequality proof

full rationale

The paper's central result derives the 3-approximation for Uniform-Ironed-Virtual-Value Item Pricing directly from a newly proved benchmark-based 3-competitive prophet inequality, without routing through Myerson Auction as an intermediary (which previously forced the 4-approximation via two successive 2-approximations). The abstract explicitly positions this prophet inequality and its constructive proof as the technical core, presented as a self-contained contribution rather than a fit, renaming, or self-citation reduction. No equations or steps in the provided description reduce the claimed guarantee to a tautology or prior self-citation chain; the impossibility result for single-dimensional representatives is consistent but does not create circularity. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard assumptions from prior mechanism design literature on the duality relaxation benchmark and prophet inequalities; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions from prior works on duality relaxation benchmark and prophet inequalities
    The paper builds on results from Chawla et al. and Cai et al.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5890 in / 1166 out tokens · 30545 ms · 2026-06-27T14:24:57.236803+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    John Thanassoulis , title =. J. Econ. Theory , volume =. 2004 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.jet.2003.09.002 , timestamp =

  2. [2]

    Hartline , editor =

    Nima Haghpanah and Jason D. Hartline , editor =. Reverse Mechanism Design , booktitle =. 2015 , url =. doi:10.1145/2764468.2764498 , timestamp =

  3. [3]

    Graham , title =

    Ronald L. Graham , title =. Inf. Process. Lett. , volume =. 1972 , url =. doi:10.1016/0020-0190(72)90045-2 , timestamp =

  4. [4]

    On Revenue Monotonicity in Combinatorial Auctions , booktitle =

    Andrew Chi. On Revenue Monotonicity in Combinatorial Auctions , booktitle =. 2018 , url =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99660-8\_1 , timestamp =

  5. [5]

    Book draft

    Mechanism design and approximation , author=. Book draft. October , volume=

  6. [6]

    Learning Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctions , booktitle =

    Yaonan Jin and Pinyan Lu and Tao Xiao , editor =. Learning Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctions , booktitle =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2023.75 , timestamp =

  7. [7]

    2016 , isbn =

    Nikhil R. Devanur and Zhiyi Huang and Christos. The sample complexity of auctions with side information , booktitle =. 2016 , url =. doi:10.1145/2897518.2897553 , timestamp =

  8. [8]

    Matthew Weinberg , title =

    Patrick Briest and Shuchi Chawla and Robert Kleinberg and S. Matthew Weinberg , title =. J. Econ. Theory , volume =. 2015 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.jet.2014.04.011 , timestamp =

  9. [9]

    Sergiu Hart and Noam Nisan , title =. J. Econ. Theory , volume =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.jet.2019.07.006 , timestamp =

  10. [10]

    Malec and Balasubramanian Sivan , title =

    Shuchi Chawla and David L. Malec and Balasubramanian Sivan , title =. Games Econ. Behav. , volume =. 2015 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2012.08.010 , timestamp =

  11. [11]

    Probability on Banach spaces , volume=

    On semiamarts, amarts, and processes with finite value , author=. Probability on Banach spaces , volume=. 1978 , publisher=

  12. [12]

    Sergiu Hart and Noam Nisan , title =. J. Econ. Theory , volume =. 2017 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.jet.2017.09.001 , timestamp =

  13. [13]

    Kleinberg and Tuomas Sandholm , title =

    Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi and Robert D. Kleinberg and Tuomas Sandholm , title =. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second. 2007 , url =

  14. [14]

    Theoretical Economics , volume=

    Maximal revenue with multiple goods: Nonmonotonicity and other observations , author=. Theoretical Economics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  15. [15]

    the Annals of Probability , pages=

    Comparison of threshold stop rules and maximum for independent nonnegative random variables , author=. the Annals of Probability , pages=. 1984 , publisher=

  16. [16]

    2022 , url =

    Yaonan Jin and Shunhua Jiang and Pinyan Lu and Hengjie Zhang , title =. 2022 , url =. doi:10.1137/21m1456364 , timestamp =

  17. [17]

    The Competition Complexity of Auctions:

    Alon Eden and Michal Feldman and Ophir Friedler and Inbal Talgam. The Competition Complexity of Auctions:. Proceedings of the 2017. 2017 , url =. doi:10.1145/3033274.3085115 , timestamp =

  18. [18]

    Matthew Weinberg , editor =

    Hedyeh Beyhaghi and S. Matthew Weinberg , editor =. Optimal (and benchmark-optimal) competition complexity for additive buyers over independent items , booktitle =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1145/3313276.3316405 , timestamp =

  19. [19]

    On the Approximability of Simple Mechanisms for

    Yaonan Jin and Weian Li and Qi Qi , editor =. On the Approximability of Simple Mechanisms for. Web and Internet Economics - 15th International Conference,. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35389-6\_17 , timestamp =

  20. [20]

    2014 , timestamp =

    Vasileios Syrgkanis , title =. 2014 , timestamp =

  21. [21]

    Tight Bounds for the Price of Anarchy of Simultaneous First-Price Auctions , journal =

    George Christodoulou and Annam. Tight Bounds for the Price of Anarchy of Simultaneous First-Price Auctions , journal =. 2016 , url =. doi:10.1145/2847520 , timestamp =

  22. [22]

    Algorithmica , volume =

    George Christodoulou and Alkmini Sgouritsa and Bo Tang , title =. Algorithmica , volume =. 2018 , url =. doi:10.1007/s00453-017-0296-2 , timestamp =

  23. [23]

    Theory Comput

    Georgios Birmpas and Evangelos Markakis and Orestis Telelis and Artem Tsikiridis , title =. Theory Comput. Syst. , volume =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1007/s00224-018-9889-7 , timestamp =

  24. [24]

    Games Econ

    Michal Feldman and Hu Fu and Nick Gravin and Brendan Lucier , title =. Games Econ. Behav. , volume =. 2020 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2015.11.009 , timestamp =

  25. [25]

    Composable and efficient mechanisms , booktitle =

    Vasilis Syrgkanis and. Composable and efficient mechanisms , booktitle =. 2013 , url =. doi:10.1145/2488608.2488635 , timestamp =

  26. [26]

    Benjamin Miller , editor =

    Shuchi Chawla and J. Benjamin Miller , editor =. Mechanism Design for Subadditive Agents via an Ex Ante Relaxation , booktitle =. 2016 , url =. doi:10.1145/2940716.2940756 , timestamp =

  27. [27]

    Mathematics of operations research , volume=

    Optimal auction design , author=. Mathematics of operations research , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

  28. [28]

    Yang Cai and Ziyun Chen and Jinzhao Wu , title =. 64th

  29. [29]

    Yaonan Jin and Pinyan Lu , title =. 63rd. 2022 , url =. doi:10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00024 , timestamp =

  30. [30]

    The Price of Stability for First Price Auction , booktitle =

    Yaonan Jin and Pinyan Lu , editor =. The Price of Stability for First Price Auction , booktitle =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch14 , timestamp =

  31. [31]

    Jiang , author T

    Jason D. Hartline and Aleck C. Johnsen and Yingkai Li , editor =. Benchmark Design and Prior-independent Optimization , booktitle =. 2020 , url =. doi:10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00036 , timestamp =

  32. [32]

    Amine Allouah and Omar Besbes , title =. Manag. Sci. , volume =. 2020 , url =. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3459 , timestamp =

  33. [33]

    Optimal Pricing for

    Yiannis Giannakopoulos and Diogo Po. Optimal Pricing for. 2021 , url =. doi:10.1145/3434423 , timestamp =

  34. [34]

    and Childs, Andrew M

    Ning Chen and Nick Gravin and Pinyan Lu , editor =. Optimal competitive auctions , booktitle =. 2014 , url =. doi:10.1145/2591796.2591855 , timestamp =

  35. [35]

    Posted Price Mechanisms and Optimal Threshold Strategies for Random Arrivals , journal =

    Jos. Posted Price Mechanisms and Optimal Threshold Strategies for Random Arrivals , journal =. 2021 , url =. doi:10.1287/moor.2020.1105 , timestamp =

  36. [36]

    Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , pages =

    Jos. A Constant Factor Prophet Inequality for Online Combinatorial Auctions , booktitle =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.1145/3564246.3585151 , timestamp =

  37. [37]

    Jiang , author T

    Paul D. An O(log log m) Prophet Inequality for Subadditive Combinatorial Auctions , booktitle =. 2020 , url =. doi:10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00037 , timestamp =

  38. [38]

    On the Computational Complexity of Optimal Simple Mechanisms , booktitle =

    Aviad Rubinstein , editor =. On the Computational Complexity of Optimal Simple Mechanisms , booktitle =. 2016 , url =. doi:10.1145/2840728.2840736 , timestamp =

  39. [39]

    The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design , booktitle =

    Constantinos Daskalakis and Alan Deckelbaum and Christos Tzamos , editor =. The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design , booktitle =. 2014 , url =. doi:10.1137/1.9781611973402.96 , timestamp =

  40. [40]

    On the Complexity of Simple and Optimal Deterministic Mechanisms for an Additive Buyer , booktitle =

    Xi Chen and George Matikas and Dimitris Paparas and Mihalis Yannakakis , editor =. On the Complexity of Simple and Optimal Deterministic Mechanisms for an Additive Buyer , booktitle =. 2018 , url =. doi:10.1137/1.9781611975031.133 , timestamp =

  41. [41]

    From pricing to prophets, and back! , journal =

    Jos. From pricing to prophets, and back! , journal =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.orl.2018.11.010 , timestamp =

  42. [42]

    Matthew Weinberg , title =

    Aviad Rubinstein and S. Matthew Weinberg , title =. 2018 , url =. doi:10.1145/3105448 , timestamp =

  43. [43]

    Simple mechanisms for subadditive buyers via duality , booktitle =

    Yang Cai and Mingfei Zhao , editor =. Simple mechanisms for subadditive buyers via duality , booktitle =. 2017 , url =. doi:10.1145/3055399.3055465 , timestamp =

  44. [44]

    Hartline and Tim Roughgarden , editor =

    Jason D. Hartline and Tim Roughgarden , editor =. Simple versus optimal mechanisms , booktitle =. 2009 , url =. doi:10.1145/1566374.1566407 , timestamp =

  45. [45]

    Papadimitriou , editor =

    Yang Cai and Christos H. Papadimitriou , editor =. Simultaneous bayesian auctions and computational complexity , booktitle =. 2014 , url =. doi:10.1145/2600057.2602877 , timestamp =

  46. [46]

    On revenue maximization for selling multiple independently distributed items , journal =

    Xinye Li and Andrew Chi. On revenue maximization for selling multiple independently distributed items , journal =. 2013 , url =. doi:10.1073/pnas.1309533110 , timestamp =

  47. [47]

    Andrew Chi. An. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual. 2015 , url =. doi:10.1137/1.9781611973730.8 , timestamp =

  48. [48]

    Reaping the Benefits of Bundling under High Production Costs , booktitle =

    Will Ma and David Simchi. Reaping the Benefits of Bundling under High Production Costs , booktitle =. 2021 , url =

  49. [49]

    2022 , url =

    Constantinos Daskalakis and Maxwell Fishelson and Brendan Lucier and Vasilis Syrgkanis and Santhoshini Velusamy , title =. 2022 , url =. doi:10.1137/22m1471742 , timestamp =

  50. [50]

    Matthew Weinberg , title =

    Moshe Babaioff and Nicole Immorlica and Brendan Lucier and S. Matthew Weinberg , title =. J. 2020 , url =. doi:10.1145/3398745 , timestamp =

  51. [51]

    Computing simple mechanisms: Lift-and-round over marginal reduced forms , booktitle =

    Yang Cai and Argyris Oikonomou and Mingfei Zhao , editor =. Computing simple mechanisms: Lift-and-round over marginal reduced forms , booktitle =. 2022 , url =. doi:10.1145/3519935.3520029 , timestamp =

  52. [52]

    Yingkai Li , title =

  53. [53]

    Yaonan Jin and Pinyan Lu and Zhide Wei , title =

  54. [54]

    The menu-size complexity of auctions , booktitle =

    Sergiu Hart and Noam Nisan , editor =. The menu-size complexity of auctions , booktitle =. 2013 , url =. doi:10.1145/2492002.2482544 , timestamp =

  55. [55]

    Matthew Weinberg , title =

    Robert Kleinberg and S. Matthew Weinberg , title =. Games Econ. Behav. , volume =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2014.11.002 , timestamp =

  56. [56]

    Games Econ

    Yang Cai and Constantinos Daskalakis , title =. Games Econ. Behav. , volume =. 2015 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2015.02.003 , timestamp =

  57. [57]

    Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies

    Pravesh Kothari and Sahil Singla and Divyarthi Mohan and Ariel Schvartzman and S. Matthew Weinberg , editor =. Approximation Schemes for a Unit-Demand Buyer with Independent Items via Symmetries , booktitle =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1109/FOCS.2019.00023 , timestamp =

  58. [58]

    Games Econ

    Xi Chen and Ilias Diakonikolas and Dimitris Paparas and Xiaorui Sun and Mihalis Yannakakis , title =. Games Econ. Behav. , volume =. 2018 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.03.016 , timestamp =

  59. [59]

    2020 , url =

    Yaonan Jin and Pinyan Lu and Zhihao Gavin Tang and Tao Xiao , title =. 2020 , url =. doi:10.1137/19M126178X , timestamp =

  60. [60]

    Hartline and David L

    Shuchi Chawla and Jason D. Hartline and David L. Malec and Balasubramanian Sivan , editor =. Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , booktitle =. 2010 , url =. doi:10.1145/1806689.1806733 , timestamp =

  61. [61]

    Hartline and Robert D

    Shuchi Chawla and Jason D. Hartline and Robert D. Kleinberg , editor =. Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations , booktitle =. 2007 , url =. doi:10.1145/1250910.1250946 , timestamp =

  62. [62]

    2022 , url =

    Xi Chen and Ilias Diakonikolas and Anthi Orfanou and Dimitris Paparas and Xiaorui Sun and Mihalis Yannakakis , title =. 2022 , url =. doi:10.1137/17m1136481 , timestamp =

  63. [63]

    Tight approximation ratio of anonymous pricing , booktitle =

    Yaonan Jin and Pinyan Lu and Qi Qi and Zhihao Gavin Tang and Tao Xiao , editor =. Tight approximation ratio of anonymous pricing , booktitle =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1145/3313276.3316331 , timestamp =

  64. [64]

    Devanur and S

    Yang Cai and Nikhil R. Devanur and S. Matthew Weinberg , title =. 2021 , url =. doi:10.1137/16M1100113 , timestamp =

  65. [65]

    Matthew Weinberg , title =

    Yang Cai and Constantinos Daskalakis and S. Matthew Weinberg , title =. 53rd Annual. 2012 , url =. doi:10.1109/FOCS.2012.88 , timestamp =

  66. [66]

    Hartline and Rad Niazadeh and Emmanouil Pountourakis and Yang Yuan , title =

    Saeed Alaei and Jason D. Hartline and Rad Niazadeh and Emmanouil Pountourakis and Yang Yuan , title =. Games Econ. Behav. , volume =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.08.003 , timestamp =