pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10178 · v1 · pith:JRILYHH4new · submitted 2026-06-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Pressure-Driven Structural Phase Competition and Functional Response in Layered LiInP2S6

Xiaochi Xie , Pegah Mohammadi , Sobhit Singh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords LiInP2S6pressure-induced phase transitionlayered materialsdensity functional theorypolymorphsinterlayer couplingmechanical propertieselectronic structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hydrostatic pressure induces a structural phase transition in LiInP2S6 from monoclinic C2/c to trigonal P-31c in-layer at ~0.38 GPa.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses density-functional theory to track the pressure response of three LiInP2S6 polymorphs that differ in how their layers stack. It shows the monoclinic ground state loses stability to one trigonal arrangement once interlayer coupling strengthens and the lattice compresses unevenly. Inside each fixed structure the band gap and optical absorption change only modestly with pressure, yet both shift markedly when the material crosses into the new phase. Mechanical stability persists to 26 GPa in all cases, with stiffness, sound velocities, and Debye temperature rising steadily. The work therefore positions LiInP2S6 as an ionic van der Waals compound whose functional behavior is controlled by small adjustments to interlayer forces.

Core claim

First-principles calculations establish that the monoclinic C2/c phase is the zero-pressure ground state but yields to the trigonal P-31c in-layer phase at approximately 0.38 GPa; the competing P-31c in-gap phase stays higher in energy throughout. The transition is attributed to pressure-enhanced interlayer coupling combined with anisotropic compression. All three phases remain mechanically stable from 0 to 26 GPa, displaying rising elastic moduli, wave velocities, and Debye temperatures. Electronic and optical quantities stay largely insensitive to pressure within a given phase yet undergo clear changes across the structural boundary.

What carries the argument

Pressure-dependent total-energy ordering of the C2/c, P-31c in-layer, and P-31c in-gap polymorphs computed with DFT plus van der Waals corrections, which locates the stability crossover and quantifies interlayer-coupling changes.

If this is right

  • The structural switch is driven by pressure-enhanced interlayer coupling and anisotropic lattice compression.
  • Mechanical rigidity, elastic wave velocities, and Debye temperatures increase with pressure in every phase.
  • Band gaps and optical absorption edges vary only moderately with pressure inside a fixed phase.
  • Functional properties change substantially when the material crosses the pressure-induced structural boundary.
  • LiInP2S6 behaves as a pressure-sensitive ionic-vdW compound whose stability and response are governed by interlayer interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous low-pressure structural switches may occur in other layered compounds that host multiple ionic-vdW polymorphs.
  • The transition could be harnessed in thin-film devices to toggle optical or electronic response with modest external pressure.
  • Temperature or defect engineering might shift the observed transition pressure, offering an experimental test of the interlayer-coupling mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen density-functional-theory functional and van der Waals correction correctly rank the total energies of the three polymorphs and therefore locate the transition pressure accurately.

What would settle it

A diamond-anvil-cell X-ray diffraction experiment on LiInP2S6 that either detects or rules out a monoclinic-to-trigonal structural change near 0.38 GPa under hydrostatic pressure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10178 by Pegah Mohammadi, Sobhit Singh, Xiaochi Xie.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Crystal structures of layered LiInP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Enthalpy difference (∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Pressure dependence of the normalized lattice parameters relative to their values at 0 GPa for the studied [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Calculated orbital-resolved density of states (DOS) for LiInP E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Electronic band structures of LiInP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Calculated optical absorption coefficients of LiInP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The real ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Calculated optical properties of LiInP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding how hydrostatic pressure modifies interlayer interactions and competing ionic configurations is essential for controlling the emergent functional properties of layered quantum materials. Here, using first-principles density-functional theory calculations, we investigate the pressure-dependent structural, mechanical, electronic, and optical properties of three competing LiInP2S6 polymorphs: the monoclinic C2/c phase and the trigonal P-31c phase in both in-layer and in-gap configurations. Our results reveal a pressure-induced structural phase transition from the monoclinic ground-state C2/c phase to a trigonal P-31c in-layer phase at ~0.38 GPa, driven by enhanced interlayer coupling and anisotropic lattice compression. In contrast, the trigonal P-31c in-gap phase remains energetically unfavorable due to its stronger interlayer ionic interactions and reduced compressibility. All phases remain mechanically stable under compression (0-26 GPa) and exhibit enhanced mechanical rigidity, elastic wave velocities, and Debye temperatures with increasing pressure. Remarkably, the electronic and optical properties within each phase remain highly robust under pressure, with only moderate changes in the band gap and optical absorption edge (UV-Visible range) under pressure; however, substantial modifications emerge across the pressure-induced structural phase transition. These findings establish LiInP2S6 as a pressure sensitive ionic-vdW material in which subtle changes in interlayer interactions govern structural stability and functional properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses first-principles DFT calculations to examine three LiInP2S6 polymorphs (monoclinic C2/c ground state, trigonal P-31c in-layer, and trigonal P-31c in-gap). It reports a pressure-driven structural transition from C2/c to the P-31c in-layer phase at ~0.38 GPa arising from enhanced interlayer coupling and anisotropic compression. Within each phase the structures remain mechanically stable to 26 GPa with increasing elastic moduli, wave velocities, and Debye temperatures; electronic and optical properties are largely robust inside a given phase but change across the transition.

Significance. If the reported transition pressure is reliable, the work identifies LiInP2S6 as a pressure-tunable ionic-vdW layered material in which small changes in interlayer energetics control both structure and functional response. The direct enthalpy-crossing prediction supplies a concrete, falsifiable target for high-pressure experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: the exchange-correlation functional and van der Waals correction are neither named nor benchmarked against experimental lattice constants, interlayer spacings, or known properties of related thiophosphates. Because the 0.38 GPa transition is set by meV-scale enthalpy differences whose pressure derivative is dominated by interlayer binding, typical 10–50 meV/Ų errors in common vdW schemes can shift the crossing by several GPa. A functional-sensitivity study or comparison to experiment is required to substantiate the central claim.
  2. [Results] Results (enthalpy vs pressure): the manuscript must present the explicit enthalpy–pressure curves for all three polymorphs together with the numerical procedure used to locate the crossing (including any fitting or interpolation). Without these data it is impossible to judge the precision or robustness of the quoted 0.38 GPa value.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the computational details (code, functional, vdW correction, k-point mesh, cutoff) should be stated at least at the level of a methods summary sentence.
  2. Notation: ensure consistent use of space-group symbols (C2/c vs. C2/c) and phase labels (in-layer vs. in-gap) throughout text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have made revisions to improve the clarity and completeness of the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: the exchange-correlation functional and van der Waals correction are neither named nor benchmarked against experimental lattice constants, interlayer spacings, or known properties of related thiophosphates. Because the 0.38 GPa transition is set by meV-scale enthalpy differences whose pressure derivative is dominated by interlayer binding, typical 10–50 meV/Ų errors in common vdW schemes can shift the crossing by several GPa. A functional-sensitivity study or comparison to experiment is required to substantiate the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the specific functional and vdW correction should have been named explicitly. The revised manuscript now states in the Methods section that the PBE functional with DFT-D3 van der Waals correction was used. We acknowledge that no dedicated benchmarking against experiment or functional-sensitivity analysis was performed in the original work, as experimental data for LiInP2S6 are limited and such a study would require substantial additional computations. We have added a short discussion of the functional choice based on its common use for thiophosphates and note the potential sensitivity of the low transition pressure. This constitutes a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results (enthalpy vs pressure): the manuscript must present the explicit enthalpy–pressure curves for all three polymorphs together with the numerical procedure used to locate the crossing (including any fitting or interpolation). Without these data it is impossible to judge the precision or robustness of the quoted 0.38 GPa value.

    Authors: We agree that the enthalpy-pressure curves and the procedure for locating the transition should be shown explicitly. The revised manuscript includes a new figure displaying the enthalpy versus pressure for the C2/c, P-31c in-layer, and P-31c in-gap phases over the relevant pressure range. The text now describes the procedure: total enthalpies were computed at discrete pressures from 0 to 2 GPa, and the crossing between the C2/c and P-31c in-layer curves was located via linear interpolation, yielding the reported value of ~0.38 GPa. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: transition pressure is direct DFT enthalpy output

full rationale

The paper reports a pressure-induced phase transition at ~0.38 GPa obtained by comparing DFT-computed enthalpies of the C2/c and P-31c polymorphs as functions of pressure. This crossing point is an output of the total-energy calculations under the chosen XC functional and vdW correction; it is not obtained by fitting any parameter to the transition data itself, nor by self-citation of a uniqueness theorem, nor by smuggling an ansatz. No equations reduce the reported pressure or property changes to quantities defined from the same dataset. The derivation is therefore self-contained in the first-principles workflow.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT total-energy comparisons between polymorphs; no new entities are postulated and the only free parameters are the usual numerical settings of a DFT calculation (k-mesh, cutoff, functional) whose values are not reported in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DFT with a chosen exchange-correlation functional and dispersion correction yields accurate relative energies for ionic-vdW layered polymorphs under hydrostatic pressure.
    Invoked throughout the abstract when ranking the C2/c, P-31c in-layer, and P-31c in-gap phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5789 in / 1308 out tokens · 20756 ms · 2026-06-27T15:25:54.284747+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Van der waals integration before and beyond two-dimensional ma- terials,

    Yuan Liu, Yu Huang, and Xiangfeng Duan, “Van der waals integration before and beyond two-dimensional ma- terials,” Nature567, 323–333 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Towards two-dimensional van der Waals ferro- electrics,

    Chuanshou Wang, Lu You, David Cobden, and Junling Wang, “Towards two-dimensional van der Waals ferro- electrics,” Nature Materials22, 542–552 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Ferroelectric switch- ing of a two-dimensional metal,

    Zaiyao Fei, Wenjin Zhao, Tauno A Palomaki, Bosong Sun, Moira K Miller, Zhiying Zhao, Jiaqiang Yan, Xi- aodong Xu, and David H Cobden, “Ferroelectric switch- ing of a two-dimensional metal,” Nature560, 336–339 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Van der Waals het- erostructures,

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, “Van der Waals het- erostructures,” Nature499, 419–425 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures,

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, “2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures,” Science353, aac9439 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Intrinsic two-dimensional ferroelectricity with dipole locking,

    Jun Xiao, Hanyu Zhu, Ying Wang, Wei Feng, Yunxia Hu, Arvind Dasgupta, Yimo Han, Yuan Wang, David A Muller, Lane W Martin,et al., “Intrinsic two-dimensional ferroelectricity with dipole locking,” Physical review let- ters120, 227601 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Two-dimensional van der Waals materials,

    P. Ajayan, P. Kim, and K. Banerjee, “Two-dimensional van der Waals materials,” Physics Today69, 38–44 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    A universal method for rapid and large-scale growth of layered crys- tals,

    Apoorva Chaturvedi, Bo Chen, Keke Zhang, Qiyuan He, Gwang-Hyeon Nam, Lu You, Zhuangchai Lai, Chaoliang Tan, Thu Ha Tran, Guigao Liu,et al., “A universal method for rapid and large-scale growth of layered crys- tals,” SmartMat1, e1011 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Tunable quadruple-well ferroelectric van der waals crystals,

    John A Brehm, Sabine M Neumayer, Lei Tao, An- drew O’Hara, Marius Chyasnavichus, Michael A Susner, Michael A McGuire, Sergei V Kalinin, Stephen Jesse, Panchapakesan Ganesh,et al., “Tunable quadruple-well ferroelectric van der waals crystals,” Nature Materials 19, 43–48 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Piezo-electric and allied phenomena in rochelle salt,

    Joseph Valasek, “Piezo-electric and allied phenomena in rochelle salt,” Physical review17, 475 (1921)

    1921

  11. [11]

    Stacking ferroelectricity in two-dimensional van der waals materials,

    Zhigang Gui and Li Huang, “Stacking ferroelectricity in two-dimensional van der waals materials,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 113005 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Pressure-tuned plethora of fer- roelectric phases in CuInP2S6,

    Sambridhi Shah, Pegah Mohammadi, Bess G. Singidas, Kevin A. Smith, Yanhong Gu, Luther J. Langston, Brian Taylor, Ryan P. Siebenaller, Michael A. Susner, Sang- Wook Cheong, Hirokazu Kadobayashi, Roland V. Sar- mago, Zhenxian Liu, Takahiro Matsuoka, Sobhit Singh, and Janice L. Musfeldt, “Pressure-tuned plethora of fer- roelectric phases in CuInP2S6,” npj 2D...

    2026

  13. [13]

    Stress and curvature effects in layered 2d ferroelectric CuInP 2S6,

    Yongtao Liu, Anna N Morozovska, Ayana Ghosh, Kyle P Kelley, Eugene A Eliseev, Jinyuan Yao, Ying Liu, and Sergei Kalinin, “Stress and curvature effects in layered 2d ferroelectric CuInP 2S6,” ACS nano17, 22004–22014 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Pressure-driven phase transforma- tions and phase segregation in ferrielectric CuInP 2S6- In4/3P2S6 self-assembled heterostructures,

    Rahul Rao, Benjamin S Conner, Ryan Selhorst, and Michael A Susner, “Pressure-driven phase transforma- tions and phase segregation in ferrielectric CuInP 2S6- In4/3P2S6 self-assembled heterostructures,” Physical Re- view B104, 235421 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Pressure-induced phase transition in ferri- electric CuInP 2S6,

    A. Grzechnik, V. B. Cajipe, C. Payen, and P. F. McMillan, “Pressure-induced phase transition in ferri- electric CuInP 2S6,” Solid State Communications108, 43–47 (1998)

    1998

  16. [16]

    Conversion of non-van der waals solids to 2d transition-metal chalcogenides,

    Zhiguo Du, Shubin Yang, Songmei Li, Jun Lou, Shuqing Zhang, Shuai Wang, Bin Li, Yongji Gong, Li Song, Xiao- long Zou,et al., “Conversion of non-van der waals solids to 2d transition-metal chalcogenides,” Nature577, 492– 496 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Ionic control over ferroelectricity in 2d layered van der waals capacitors,

    Sabine M Neumayer, Mengwei Si, Junkang Li, Pai-Ying Liao, Lei Tao, Andrew O’Hara, Sokrates T Pantelides, Peide D Ye, Petro Maksymovych, and Nina Balke, “Ionic control over ferroelectricity in 2d layered van der waals capacitors,” ACS applied materials & interfaces14, 3018–3026 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Strain engineering to facilitate the oc- currence of 2d ferroelectricity in CuInP 2S6 monolayer,

    Zhi-Zheng Sun, Wei Xun, Li Jiang, Jia-Lin Zhong, and Yin-Zhong Wu, “Strain engineering to facilitate the oc- currence of 2d ferroelectricity in CuInP 2S6 monolayer,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics52, 465302 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    Pressure-induced phase transitions and asynchronous ferroelectric switch- ing mechanism in CuInP 2S6,

    Pegah Mohammadi and Sobhit Singh, “Pressure-induced phase transitions and asynchronous ferroelectric switch- ing mechanism in CuInP 2S6,” Physical Review B112, 125205 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Emerging van der waals material CuInP 2S6: physical properties, theories and applications,

    Tian-Xiao Xu, Xiao-Bing Guo, Dan Zhang, Qi-Jun Sun, Yan-Ping Jiang, Qiu-Xiang Liu, and Xin-Gui Tang, “Emerging van der waals material CuInP 2S6: physical properties, theories and applications,” Journal of Mate- rials Chemistry A12, 31028–31058 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Anisotropic photore- sponse in a van der waals CuInP 2S6 crystal,

    Chuangye Song, Jiawei Huang, Haoran Huang, Guocheng Zhao, Xiaoyue He, and Kehui Wu, “Anisotropic photore- sponse in a van der waals CuInP 2S6 crystal,” Physical Review B109, 174109 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Optical absorption studies of phase transi- tions in CuCrP 2S6layered antiferroelectrics,

    IP Studenyak, OA Mykajlo, Yu M Vysochanskii, and VB Cajipe, “Optical absorption studies of phase transi- tions in CuCrP 2S6layered antiferroelectrics,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter15, 6773–6779 (2003)

    2003

  23. [23]

    Mechan- ical properties of 2D LiInP 2Se6: Implication for semi- conductor applications,

    Doyun Kim, Eric K. Qian, Daniel G. Chica, Yu-Hsiang Chiang, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, and Qing Tu, “Mechan- ical properties of 2D LiInP 2Se6: Implication for semi- conductor applications,” ACS Applied Nano Materials 6, 8214–8221 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Magnetic and polar phases and dynamical clustering in multiferroic lay- ered solid solutions CuCr 1−xInxP2S6,

    Wolfgang Kleemann, VV Shvartsman, Pavel Borisov, Juras Banys, and Yu M Vysochanskii, “Magnetic and polar phases and dynamical clustering in multiferroic lay- ered solid solutions CuCr 1−xInxP2S6,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics84, 094411 (2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    Metal thio-and selenophosphates as multifunc- tional van der waals layered materials,

    Michael A Susner, Marius Chyasnavichyus, Michael A McGuire, Panchapakesan Ganesh, and Petro Maksy- movych, “Metal thio-and selenophosphates as multifunc- tional van der waals layered materials,” Advanced Mate- rials29, 1602852 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    Synthesis and structural characterization of the alkali thiophosphates Na2P2S6, Na4P2S6, K4P2S6, and Rb 4P2S6,

    Alexander Kuhn, Roland Eger, J¨ urgen Nuss, and Bet- tina V Lotsch, “Synthesis and structural characterization of the alkali thiophosphates Na2P2S6, Na4P2S6, K4P2S6, and Rb 4P2S6,” Zeitschrift f¨ ur anorganische und allge- meine Chemie640, 689–692 (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    Room-temperature ferroelectricity in CuInP 2S6 ultrathin flakes,

    F. Liu, L. You, K. L. Seyler, X. Li, P. Yu, J. Lin, X. Wang, J. Zhou, H. Wang, H. He, S. T. Pan- telides, W. Zhou, P. Sharma, X. Xu, P. M. Ajayan, J. Wang, and Z. Liu, “Room-temperature ferroelectricity in CuInP 2S6 ultrathin flakes,” Nature Communications 7, 12357 (2016). 11

    2016

  28. [28]

    Dipolar glass phase in ferrielectrics: CuInP 2S6 and Ag0.1Cu0.9InP2S6 crystals,

    Andrius Dziaugys, Juras Banys, Jan Macutkevic, Ricardas Sobiestianskas, and Yulian Vysochanskii, “Dipolar glass phase in ferrielectrics: CuInP 2S6 and Ag0.1Cu0.9InP2S6 crystals,” physica status solidi (a) 207, 1960–1967 (2010)

    1960

  29. [29]

    Dual-role ion dynamics in ferroionic CuInP 2S6: reveal- ing the transition from ferroelectric to ionic switching mechanisms,

    Xingan Jiang, Xiangping Zhang, Zunyi Deng, Jianming Deng, Xiaolei Wang, Xueyun Wang, and Weiyou Yang, “Dual-role ion dynamics in ferroionic CuInP 2S6: reveal- ing the transition from ferroelectric to ionic switching mechanisms,” Nature Communications15, 10822 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Ferri-ionic coupling in CuInP2S6 nanoflakes: Po- larization states and controllable negative capacitance,

    Anna N Morozovska, Sergei V Kalinin, Eugene A Eliseev, Svitlana Kopyl, Yulian M Vysochanskii, and Dean R Evans, “Ferri-ionic coupling in CuInP2S6 nanoflakes: Po- larization states and controllable negative capacitance,” Physical Review Applied22, 034059 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Unconventional ferroelectric domain switching dynamics in CuInP 2S6 from first principles,

    Ri He, Hua Wang, Fucai Liu, Shi Liu, Houfang Liu, and Zhicheng Zhong, “Unconventional ferroelectric domain switching dynamics in CuInP 2S6 from first principles,” Physical Review B108, 024305 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    CuInP 2S6 room temperature layered ferroelectric,

    A. Belianinov, Q. He, A. Dziaugys, P. Maksymovych, E. Eliseev, A. Borisevich, A. Morozovska, J. Banys, Y. Vysochanskii, and S. V. Kalinin, “CuInP 2S6 room temperature layered ferroelectric,” Nano Letters15, 3808–3814 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    Ferrielectric ordering in lamellar CuInP2S6,

    V Maisonneuve, VB Cajipe, A Simon, R Von Der Muhll, and JJPRB Ravez, “Ferrielectric ordering in lamellar CuInP2S6,” Physical Review B56, 10860 (1997)

    1997

  34. [34]

    A room-temperature ferroelectric semimetal,

    Pankaj Sharma, Fei-Xiang Xiang, Ding-Fu Shao, Dawei Zhang, Evgeny Y Tsymbal, Alex R Hamilton, and Jan Seidel, “A room-temperature ferroelectric semimetal,” Science advances5, eaax5080 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    Cyclic ferroelectric switching and quantized charge transport in CuInP 2S6,

    Daniel Seleznev, Sobhit Singh, John Bonini, Karin M Rabe, and David Vanderbilt, “Cyclic ferroelectric switching and quantized charge transport in CuInP 2S6,” Physical Review B108, L180101 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Com- peting polar phases in 2d ferroelectric transition metal thio-and selenophosphates,

    Sabine Neumayer, Huimin Qiao, and Nina Balke, “Com- peting polar phases in 2d ferroelectric transition metal thio-and selenophosphates,” Applied Physics Letters126 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Realization of sextuple polariza- tion states and interstate switching in antiferroelectric CuInP2S6,

    Tao Li, Yongyi Wu, Guoliang Yu, Shengxian Li, Yifeng Ren, Yadong Liu, Jiarui Liu, Hao Feng, Yu Deng, Mingxing Chen,et al., “Realization of sextuple polariza- tion states and interstate switching in antiferroelectric CuInP2S6,” Nature Communications15, 2653 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Configurable kinetics of polariza- tion switching via ion migration in ferroionic CuInP2S6,

    Lei Liang, Er Pan, Guiming Cao, Jiangang Chen, Ruixue Wang, Biao Dong, Qing Liu, Xiong Chen, Xiao Luo, Yongfa Kong,et al., “Configurable kinetics of polariza- tion switching via ion migration in ferroionic CuInP2S6,” Nature Communications16, 4462 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Paraelectric-ferroelectric transition in the lamel- lar thiophosphate CuInP 2S6,

    A Simon, J Ravez, V Maisonneuve, C Payen, and VB Ca- jipe, “Paraelectric-ferroelectric transition in the lamel- lar thiophosphate CuInP 2S6,” Chemistry of materials6, 1575–1580 (1994)

    1994

  40. [40]

    31p mas nmr study of the ferrielectric- paraelectric transition in layered CuInP 2S6,

    X Bourdon, A-R Grimmer, and VB Cajipe, “31p mas nmr study of the ferrielectric- paraelectric transition in layered CuInP 2S6,” Chemistry of materials11, 2680– 2686 (1999)

    1999

  41. [41]

    Origin of giant negative piezoelectricity in a layered van der waals ferroelectric,

    Lu You, Yang Zhang, Shuang Zhou, Apoorva Chaturvedi, Samuel A Morris, Fucai Liu, Lei Chang, Daichi Ichinose, Hiroshi Funakubo, Weijin Hu,et al., “Origin of giant negative piezoelectricity in a layered van der waals ferroelectric,” Science advances5, eaav3780 (2019)

    2019

  42. [42]

    Giant nega- tive electrostriction and dielectric tunability in a van der waals layered ferroelectric,

    Sabine M Neumayer, Eugene A Eliseev, Michael A Susner, Alexander Tselev, Brian J Rodriguez, John A Brehm, Sokrates T Pantelides, Ganesh Panchapakesan, Stephen Jesse, Sergei V Kalinin,et al., “Giant nega- tive electrostriction and dielectric tunability in a van der waals layered ferroelectric,” Physical Review Materials3, 024401 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    The concept of negative capacitance in ionically conductive van der Waals ferroelectrics,

    Sabine M. Neumayer, Lei Tao, Andrew O’Hara, Michael A. Susner, Michael A. McGuire, Petro Maksy- movych, Sokrates T. Pantelides, and Nina Balke, “The concept of negative capacitance in ionically conductive van der Waals ferroelectrics,” Advanced Energy Materi- als10, 2001726 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Stress-induced phase transitions in nanoscale CuInP2S6,

    Anna N Morozovska, Eugene A Eliseev, Sergei V Kalinin, Yulian M Vysochanskii, and Petro Maksy- movych, “Stress-induced phase transitions in nanoscale CuInP2S6,” Physical Review B104, 054102 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    The strain-induced transitions of the piezoelectric, py- roelectric, and electrocaloric properties of the CuInP 2S6 films,

    Anna N Morozovska, Eugene A Eliseev, Lesya P Yurchenko, Valentyn V Laguta, Yongtao Liu, Sergei V Kalinin, Andrei L Kholkin, and Yulian M Vysochanskii, “The strain-induced transitions of the piezoelectric, py- roelectric, and electrocaloric properties of the CuInP 2S6 films,” AIP Advances13(2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Anisotropic ion migration and electronic conduction in van der waals ferroelectric CuInP2S6,

    Dawei Zhang, Zheng-Dong Luo, Yin Yao, Peggy Schoen- herr, Chuhan Sha, Ying Pan, Pankaj Sharma, Marin Alexe, and Jan Seidel, “Anisotropic ion migration and electronic conduction in van der waals ferroelectric CuInP2S6,” Nano letters21, 995–1002 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    Ionic conductivity in ferroic CuInP2S6 and CuCrP 2S6,

    V Maisonneuve, JM Reau, Ming Dong, VB Cajipe, C Payen, and J Ravez, “Ionic conductivity in ferroic CuInP2S6 and CuCrP 2S6,” Ferroelectrics196, 257–260 (1997)

    1997

  48. [48]

    van der waals forces control ferroelectric–antiferroelectric ordering in CuInP 2S6 and CuBiP2Se6 laminar materials,

    Jeffrey R Reimers, Sherif Abdulkader Tawfik, and Michael J Ford, “van der waals forces control ferroelectric–antiferroelectric ordering in CuInP 2S6 and CuBiP2Se6 laminar materials,” Chemical Science9, 7620–7627 (2018)

    2018

  49. [49]

    Vi- brational properties of CuInP 2S6 across the ferroelectric transition,

    Sabine N Neal, Sobhit Singh, Xiaochen Fang, Choong- jae Won, Fei-ting Huang, Sang-Wook Cheong, Karin M Rabe, David Vanderbilt, and Janice L Musfeldt, “Vi- brational properties of CuInP 2S6 across the ferroelectric transition,” Physical Review B105, 075151 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Excited-state prop- erties of CuInP 2S6 monolayer as photocatalyst for water splitting,

    Hongling Liu, Shiqiang Yu, Yuanyuan Wang, Baibiao Huang, Ying Dai, and Wei Wei, “Excited-state prop- erties of CuInP 2S6 monolayer as photocatalyst for water splitting,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 1972–1978 (2022)

    1972

  51. [51]

    Second-harmonic generation in quaternary atomically thin layered AgInP2S6 crystals,

    Xingzhi Wang, Kezhao Du, Weiwei Liu, Peng Hu, Xin Lu, Weigao Xu, Christian Kloc, and Qihua Xiong, “Second-harmonic generation in quaternary atomically thin layered AgInP2S6 crystals,” Applied Physics Letters 109(2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    Structural, electronic, vibration and elastic properties of the layered AgInP 2S6 semicon- ducting crystal–dft approach,

    T Babuka, K Glukhov, Y Vysochanskii, and M Makowska-Janusik, “Structural, electronic, vibration and elastic properties of the layered AgInP 2S6 semicon- ducting crystal–dft approach,” RSC advances8, 6965– 6977 (2018)

    2018

  53. [53]

    Electrically switchable chiral light-emitting transistor,

    YJ Zhang, T Oka, Ryo Suzuki, JT Ye, and Y Iwasa, “Electrically switchable chiral light-emitting transistor,” Science344, 725–728 (2014)

    2014

  54. [54]

    Circularly polarized electroluminescence from a polymer light-emitting diode,

    Emiel Peeters, Marwijn PT Christiaans, Ren´ e AJ Janssen, Herman FM Schoo, Harry PJM Dekkers, and EW Meijer, “Circularly polarized electroluminescence from a polymer light-emitting diode,” Journal of the 12 American Chemical Society119, 9909–9910 (1997)

    1997

  55. [55]

    Anomalous superionic conductivity in van der waals lithium thiophosphates triggered by interlayer molecules,

    Jianing Liang, Yu Wu, Zongdong Sun, Cheng Zeng, Youwen Liu, Yinghe Zhao, Tianyou Zhai, and Huiqiao Li, “Anomalous superionic conductivity in van der waals lithium thiophosphates triggered by interlayer molecules,” Energy & Environmental Science17, 3210– 3217 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Van der Waals layered chi- ral structure with alkali cation exchange in LiInP 2S6,

    Eric K. Qian, Jadupati Nag, Saugata Sarker, Michael J. Waters, Venkatraman Gopalan, James M. Rondinelli, and Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, “Van der Waals layered chi- ral structure with alkali cation exchange in LiInP 2S6,” Chemistry of Materials36, 9718–9728 (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    Two- Dimensional Direct Z-Scheme LiInP 2S6/XTe2 (X = Mo and W) heterostructures for photocatalysis,

    Pingchuan Bai, Wangping Xu, Li Shi, Haoran Wei, Yuan- hao Duan, Rui Wang, Jing Fan, and Xiaozhi Wu, “Two- Dimensional Direct Z-Scheme LiInP 2S6/XTe2 (X = Mo and W) heterostructures for photocatalysis,” The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry C129, 11698–11706 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Manual shaking exfoliation of large-size two-dimensional LiInP 2S6 nanosheets with exponential change in ionic conductivity for water detection,

    Jianing Liang, Zongdong Sun, Chaoqi Zhu, Shuhao Wang, Cheng Zeng, Dawen Zeng, Tianyou Zhai, and Huiqiao Li, “Manual shaking exfoliation of large-size two-dimensional LiInP 2S6 nanosheets with exponential change in ionic conductivity for water detection,” Smart- Mat5(2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    First-Principles Discovery of Novel LiInP2S6 Polymorphs with Promising Optoelectronic Responses,

    Pegah Mohammadi, Arjyama Bordoloi, and Sobhit Singh, “First-Principles Discovery of Novel LiInP2S6 Polymorphs with Promising Optoelectronic Responses,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C130, 4936–4944 (2026)

    2026

  60. [60]

    Effect of physical and chemical pressure on the superconductivity of high- temperature oxide superconductors,

    AAR Fernandes, J Santamaria, SL Bud’ko, O Nakamura, J Guimpel, and Ivan K Schuller, “Effect of physical and chemical pressure on the superconductivity of high- temperature oxide superconductors,” Physical Review B 44, 7601 (1991)

    1991

  61. [61]

    Pressure induced superconductivity in pristine 1 t-tise 2,

    Anna F Kusmartseva, B Sipos, H Berger, Laszlo Forro, and Eduard Tutiˇ s, “Pressure induced superconductivity in pristine 1 t-tise 2,” Physical review letters103, 236401 (2009)

    2009

  62. [62]

    Pressure-induced elec- tronic mixing and enhancement of ferromagnetic ordering inEuX(X=T e, Se, S, O) magnetic semiconductors,

    Narcizo M Souza-Neto, Daniel Haskel, Yuan-Chieh Tseng, and Gerard Lapertot, “Pressure-induced elec- tronic mixing and enhancement of ferromagnetic ordering inEuX(X=T e, Se, S, O) magnetic semiconductors,” Physical review letters102, 057206 (2009)

    2009

  63. [63]

    Designing magnetic properties in CrSBr through hydrostatic pressure and ligand substi- tution,

    Evan J Telford, Daniel G Chica, Michael E Ziebel, Kaichen Xie, Nicholas S Manganaro, Chun-Ying Huang, Jordan Cox, Avalon H Dismukes, Xiaoyang Zhu, James PS Walsh,et al., “Designing magnetic properties in CrSBr through hydrostatic pressure and ligand substi- tution,” Advanced Physics Research2, 2300036 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    Two-dimensional phase-change chalcohalides,

    Cong Hu, Ziye Zhu, and Wenbin Li, “Two-dimensional phase-change chalcohalides,” Materials Today Nano24, 100433 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    Sliding-mediated ferroelectric phase transition in CuInP 2S6 under pres- sure,

    Zhou Zhou, Jun-Jie Zhang, Gemma F Turner, Stephen A Moggach, Yulia Lekina, Samuel Morris, Shun Wang, Yiqi Hu, Qiankun Li, Jinshuo Xue,et al., “Sliding-mediated ferroelectric phase transition in CuInP 2S6 under pres- sure,” Applied Physics Reviews11(2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Chemical versus phys- ical pressure effects on the structure transition of bilayer nickelates,

    Gang Wang, Ningning Wang, Tenglong Lu, Stuart Calder, Jiaqiang Yan, Lifen Shi, Jun Hou, Liang Ma, Lili Zhang, Jianping Sun,et al., “Chemical versus phys- ical pressure effects on the structure transition of bilayer nickelates,” npj Quantum Materials10, 1 (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    Enhanced second-harmonic gen- eration of van der waals CuInP2S6 via pressure-regulated cationic displacement,

    Kejun Bu, Tonghuan Fu, Ziwan Du, Xin Feng, Dong Wang, Zhongyang Li, Songhao Guo, Zongdong Sun, Hui Luo, Gang Liu,et al., “Enhanced second-harmonic gen- eration of van der waals CuInP2S6 via pressure-regulated cationic displacement,” Chemistry of Materials35, 242– 250 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Raman spectroscopy study of pressure-induced phase transitions in single crystal CuInP 2S6,

    R. Rao, B. S. Conner, J. Jiang, R. Pachter, and M. A. Susner, “Raman spectroscopy study of pressure-induced phase transitions in single crystal CuInP 2S6,” The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics159, 224706 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Pressure aging: An ef- fective process to liberate the power of high-pressure ma- terials research,

    Hui Luo, Hongli Xuan, Dong Wang, Ziwan Du, Zhongyang Li, Kejun Bu, Songhao Guo, Yuhong Mao, Fujun Lan, Fuyang Liu,et al., “Pressure aging: An ef- fective process to liberate the power of high-pressure ma- terials research,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2416835121 (2024)

    2024

  70. [70]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,” Phys. Rev. B54, 11169–11186 (1996)

    1996

  71. [71]

    Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, “Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,” Computational Materials Science6, 15–50 (1996)

    1996

  72. [72]

    From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method,

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B59, 1758–1775 (1999)

    1999

  73. [73]

    Projector augmented-wave method,

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B50, 17953–17979 (1994)

    1994

  74. [74]

    Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces,

    John P. Perdew, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, G´ abor I. Csonka, Oleg A. Vydrov, Gustavo E. Scuseria, Lucian A. Con- stantin, Xiaolan Zhou, and Kieron Burke, “Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  75. [75]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correc- tion (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu,

    Stefan Grimme, Jens Antony, Stephan Ehrlich, and Helge Krieg, “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correc- tion (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu,” The Journal of Chemical Physics132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  76. [76]

    Ef- fect of the damping function in dispersion corrected den- sity functional theory,

    Stefan Grimme, Stephan Ehrlich, and Lars Goerigk, “Ef- fect of the damping function in dispersion corrected den- sity functional theory,” Journal of Computational Chem- istry32, 1456–1465 (2011)

    2011

  77. [77]

    MechElastic: A Python library for analysis of mechanical and elastic properties of bulk and 2D materials,

    Sobhit Singh, Logan Lang, Viviana Dovale-Farelo, Uth- pala Herath, Pedram Tavadze, Fran¸ cois-Xavier Coudert, and Aldo H. Romero, “MechElastic: A Python library for analysis of mechanical and elastic properties of bulk and 2D materials,” Computer Physics Communications 267, 108068 (2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    Elastic, mechanical, and thermody- namic properties of bi-sb binaries: Effect of spin-orbit coupling,

    Sobhit Singh, Irais Valencia-Jaime, Olivia Pavlic, and Aldo H. Romero, “Elastic, mechanical, and thermody- namic properties of bi-sb binaries: Effect of spin-orbit coupling,” Phys. Rev. B97, 054108 (2018)

    2018

  79. [79]

    Pyprocar: A python library for electronic structure pre/post-processing,

    Uthpala Herath, Pedram Tavadze, Xu He, Eric Bous- quet, Sobhit Singh, Francisco Mu˜ noz, and Aldo H Romero, “Pyprocar: A python library for electronic structure pre/post-processing,” Computer Physics Com- munications251, 107080 (2020)

    2020

  80. [80]

    Expanding pyprocar for new features, maintainability, and reliability,

    Logan Lang, Pedram Tavadze, Andres Tellez, Eric Bous- quet, He Xu, Francisco Mu˜ noz, Nicolas Vasquez, Uthpala Herath, and Aldo H Romero, “Expanding pyprocar for new features, maintainability, and reliability,” Computer Physics Communications297, 109063 (2024)

    2024

Showing first 80 references.