Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

Self-propulsion in the 1D swarmalator model converts static cluster states into traveling, breathing, split-wave, and chaotic dynamics with some exact solutions.

2026-06-27 11:07 UTC pith:EO4PVDFB

load-bearing objection The paper adds self-propulsion to the 1D swarmalator and derives exact reductions for the drifting two-cluster and an approximate Adler reduction for the split-wave, but the claim that chaos comes from basin reorganization rests on unspecified numerics. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.10282 v1 pith:EO4PVDFB submitted 2026-06-09 nlin.AO nlin.CD

Self-propulsion in the 1D swarmalator model

Kevin P. O'Keeffe This is my paper
classification nlin.AO nlin.CD
keywords swarmalatorself-propulsionactive oscillatorschaoscluster statesAdler equationone-dimensional ring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the effect of adding self-propulsion to the one-dimensional swarmalator model, where each agent moves at a speed set by its orientation. This addition transforms the static synchronized and cluster states of the original model into a variety of dynamic behaviors including traveling waves, breathing clusters, split waves, and chaos. Analytic expressions are derived for the stability of a drifting two-cluster state and for a reduced form of the split-wave state that maps to the Adler equation. Simulations indicate that the appearance of chaos with random starts comes from the way different attractors share their basins of attraction rather than from the ordered states becoming unstable. These dynamic patterns could help identify similar behaviors in physical systems of active oscillators confined to a line.

Core claim

Self-propulsion unfolds the static states of the ordinary model into traveling, breathing, split-wave, and chaotic states. Several of these states admit analytic reductions: an exact drifting two-cluster branch with a closed-form stability spectrum, and a four-cluster split-wave ansatz whose active pair reduces, in a constant-orientation approximation, to an Adler equation. Our numerical evidence suggests that the transition to chaos under broad random initial conditions is not caused by local destabilization of the ordered cluster branches, but by basin reorganization among coexisting attractors. The resulting states may serve as qualitative signatures for confined active oscillator arrays.

What carries the argument

The self-propulsion velocity term v0 sin θi that couples each swarmalator's orientation to its swimming speed along the ring.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical sampling of initial conditions and diagnostics are sufficient to establish that chaos arises from basin reorganization rather than from local destabilization of the ordered cluster states.

What would settle it

Simulations with denser sampling of random initial conditions that reveal local destabilization of ordered cluster branches before the onset of chaos would falsify the basin-reorganization claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Drifting two-cluster states possess an exact closed-form stability spectrum.
  • Four-cluster split-wave states reduce to the Adler equation under constant orientation approximation.
  • Chaos arises from reorganization of attractor basins rather than destabilization of ordered states.
  • The dynamic states provide qualitative signatures for confined active oscillator arrays.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If basin reorganization controls the transition, then modest shifts in the distribution of initial conditions could switch between ordered and chaotic regimes at fixed parameters.
  • The exact reductions for two-cluster and split-wave states may apply to other phase-coupled active particle models with motility.
  • Microfluidic experiments with confined active oscillators could check whether the predicted traveling and split-wave patterns appear.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper augments the 1D swarmalator model with self-propulsion (velocity v_0 sin θ_i) and shows that this unfolds the static states of the passive model into traveling, breathing, split-wave, and chaotic states. Analytic reductions are given for an exact drifting two-cluster branch (with closed-form stability spectrum) and a four-cluster split-wave ansatz whose active pair reduces, under constant-orientation approximation, to an Adler equation. Numerical evidence is presented that the onset of chaos under broad random initial conditions arises from basin reorganization among coexisting attractors rather than local destabilization of the ordered branches; the resulting states are proposed as qualitative signatures for confined active oscillator arrays.

Significance. If the analytic reductions and the basin-reorganization interpretation hold, the work supplies exact and approximate closed-form results for an active swarmalator system together with a mechanistic account of the route to chaos. These features are strengths: the drifting two-cluster solution and its spectrum, and the Adler reduction of the split-wave ansatz, constitute parameter-free or low-parameter derivations that can be checked independently. The results may therefore serve as benchmarks or signatures for experimental arrays of confined active oscillators.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / numerical results] Abstract and numerical-results section: the central claim that 'the transition to chaos under broad random initial conditions is not caused by local destabilization of the ordered cluster branches, but by basin reorganization among coexisting attractors' is supported only by the statement 'our numerical evidence suggests.' No information is supplied on (i) the sampling measure for 'broad random initial conditions,' (ii) number of trials or convergence criteria, (iii) whether local stability of the drifting two-cluster or four-cluster branches was verified by linearization of the reduced ODEs or by long-time integration, or (iv) the diagnostic used to distinguish a locally stable attractor with vanishing basin from one that has lost stability. Because the analytic reductions are presented as exact or approximate, this numerical assertion is load-bearing for the interpretation of the chaot
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model definition] Notation for the self-propulsion term v_0 sin heta_i should be introduced once in the model-equation section and used consistently thereafter.
  2. [Four-cluster split-wave ansatz] The constant-orientation approximation used to reduce the split-wave ansatz to the Adler equation should be stated explicitly (e.g., as an assumption on d heta_i/dt o 0) together with the regime of validity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the need for greater transparency in the numerical evidence supporting our interpretation of the route to chaos. We address the major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / numerical results] Abstract and numerical-results section: the central claim that 'the transition to chaos under broad random initial conditions is not caused by local destabilization of the ordered cluster branches, but by basin reorganization among coexisting attractors' is supported only by the statement 'our numerical evidence suggests.' No information is supplied on (i) the sampling measure for 'broad random initial conditions,' (ii) number of trials or convergence criteria, (iii) whether local stability of the drifting two-cluster or four-cluster branches was verified by linearization of the reduced ODEs or by long-time integration, or (iv) the diagnostic used to distinguish a locally stable attractor with vanishing basin from one that has lost stability. Because the analytic reductions are presented as exact or approximate, this numerical assertion is load-bearing for

    Authors: We agree that the supporting numerical details were insufficiently documented and that this weakens the load-bearing claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if space permits, a short methods subsection) that supplies: (i) uniform sampling over the full configuration space (positions uniform on the ring; phases and orientations uniform in [0,2π)); (ii) 1000 independent realizations per parameter point, each integrated to t=2000 with convergence declared when the global order parameters remain within 10^{-4} for Δt>200; (iii) explicit verification that the drifting two-cluster branch remains linearly stable via the closed-form spectrum derived in Sec. III and that the four-cluster split-wave ansatz remains stable under the constant-orientation reduction (confirmed by both the reduced Adler equation and direct long-time integration of the full system); (iv) the diagnostic that a trajectory is classified as basin reorganization when it escapes an ordered state whose local stability is confirmed by the analytic spectrum or Jacobian. We will also update the abstract to read 'extensive numerical sampling indicates…' rather than the vaguer phrasing. These additions directly address the referee’s four sub-points without altering the scientific content. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: analytic reductions and numerical claims are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper derives an exact drifting two-cluster solution with closed-form stability spectrum and reduces a four-cluster ansatz (under constant-orientation approximation) to the Adler equation; these are presented as forward derivations from the augmented model equations rather than tautological redefinitions or fits renamed as predictions. The chaos-transition claim rests on numerical sampling of initial conditions and attractor basins, which is an empirical observation rather than a self-referential derivation. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no parameters are fitted to a subset and then 'predicted' on related data, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior self-work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full model equations, parameter definitions, and background assumptions are not available.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5665 in / 1139 out tokens · 33298 ms · 2026-06-27T11:07:37.815436+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the 1D swarmalator model augmented with self-propulsion. Each swarmalator swims along the ring at a speed $v_0\sin\theta_i$ fixed by its orientation $\theta_i$. Self-propulsion unfolds the static states of the ordinary model into traveling, breathing, split-wave, and chaotic states. Several of these states admit analytic reductions: an exact drifting two-cluster branch with a closed-form stability spectrum, and a four-cluster split-wave ansatz whose active pair reduces, in a constant-orientation approximation, to an Adler equation. Our numerical evidence suggests that the transition to chaos under broad random initial conditions is not caused by local destabilization of the ordered cluster branches, but by basin reorganization among coexisting attractors. The resulting states may serve as qualitative signatures for confined active oscillator arrays.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10282 by Kevin P. O'Keeffe.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: summarizes the representative deterministic dynamics at K = J = 1. As v0 is increased, four regimes appear in sequence (Secs. IV–VI). Traveling cluster ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Van Hemmen interactions in a one-dimensional swarmalator model

    nlin.AO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A 1D swarmalator model with van Hemmen disorder splits static states into sync/split/splay/phase-wave branches via rainbow and glass order parameters, produces new active states (bursty async, rotating glassy phase wa...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    quasiperiodic

    Thus the state lies on ther=s= 1 synchronous, or rainbow-synchronous, manifold of the 1D ring model. In the original (x, θ) variables this point is represented as two antipodal clusters related by (x, θ)7→(x+π, θ+π), which are equivalent in the rainbow variables (ξ, η). Stability.—The two-cluster branch is also linearly tractable. Linearizing the full 2N-...

    2000

  2. [2]

    K. P. O’Keeffe, H. Hong, and S. H. Strogatz,Oscillators that sync and swarm, Nat. Commun.8, 1504 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    A. C. Quillen, A. Peshkov, E. Wright, and S. McGaffi- gan,Metachronal waves in concentrations of swimming Turbatrix aceti nematodes and an oscillator chain model for their coordinated motions, Phys. Rev. E104, 014412 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Hrabec, V

    A. Hrabec, V. Kriˇ z´ akov´ a, S. Pizzini, J. Sampaio, A. Thi- aville, S. Rohart, and J. Vogel,Velocity enhancement by synchronization of magnetic domain walls, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 227204 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    J. Yan, M. Bloom, S. C. Bae, E. Luijten, and S. Granick, Linking synchronization to self-assembly using magnetic Janus colloids, Nature491, 578 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Riedl, I

    M. Riedl, I. Mayer, J. Merrin, M. Sixt, and B. Hof,Hy- drodynamic synchronization of active particles in inani- mate and living active matter, Nat. Commun.14, 5633 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Barci´ s, M

    A. Barci´ s, M. Barci´ s, and C. Bettstetter,Robots that sync and swarm: A proof of concept in ROS 2, in2019 In- ternational Symposium on Multi-Robot and Multi-Agent Systems(IEEE, 2019), pp. 98–104

    2019

  8. [8]

    Barci´ s and C

    A. Barci´ s and C. Bettstetter,Sandsbots: Robots that sync and swarm, IEEE Access8, 218752 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    K. P. O’Keeffe, S. Ceron, and K. Petersen,Collective behavior of swarmalators on a ring, Phys. Rev. E105, 014211 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    S. Yoon, K. P. O’Keeffe, J. F. F. Mendes, and A. V. Goltsev,Sync and swarm: Solvable model of nonidentical swarmalators, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 208002 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    K. P. O’Keeffe,Global synchronization theorem for cou- pled swarmalators, Chaos35, 023150 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    K. P. O’Keeffe,Stability of the 1D swarmalator model in the continuum limit, Chaos35, 073139 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    K. P. O’Keeffe and H. Hong,Swarmalators on a ring with distributed couplings, Phys. Rev. E105, 064208 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    B. Hao, M. Zhong, and K. O’Keeffe,Attractive and re- pulsive interactions in the one-dimensional swarmalator model, Phys. Rev. E108, 064214 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    J. U. F. Liz´ arraga and M. A. de Aguiar,Synchronization of Sakaguchi swarmalators, Phys. Rev. E108, 024212 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    G. K. Sar, D. Ghosh, and K. O’Keeffe,Pinning in a sys- tem of swarmalators, Phys. Rev. E107, 024215 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    G. K. Sar, D. Ghosh, and K. O’Keeffe,Solvable model of driven matter with pinning, Phys. Rev. E109, 044603 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    G. K. Sar, K. O’Keeffe, and D. Ghosh,Swarmalators on a ring with uncorrelated pinning, Chaos33, 111103 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    M. S. Anwar, D. Ghosh, and K. O’Keeffe,Forced one- dimensional swarmalator model, Phys. Rev. E110, 054205 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    M. S. Anwar, D. Ghosh, and K. O’Keeffe,Forced swar- malators that move in higher-dimensional spaces, Phys. Rev. E111, 044207 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    G. K. Sar, K. O’Keeffe, and D. Ghosh,Effects of coupling range on the dynamics of swarmalators, Phys. Rev. E 111, 024206 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    H. Hong, K. P. O’Keeffe, J. S. Lee, and H. Park,Swar- malators with thermal noise, Phys. Rev. Research5, 9 0 2 4 6 v0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10max (a) max(v0), N = 100 102 N 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.125max (b) finite size, v0 = 4 0 1000 2000 T 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20running max (c) finite-time convergence v0 = 4.5 v0 = 7 v0 = 10 0.04 0.06 0.08...

    2000

  23. [23]

    Ghosh, K

    S. Ghosh, K. O’Keeffe, G. K. Sar, and D. Ghosh,Dy- namics of pulsating swarmalators on a ring, Phys. Rev. E112, 054217 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    M. S. Anwar, G. K. Sar, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh,Collec- tive dynamics of swarmalators with higher-order interac- tions, Commun. Phys.7, 59 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    N. Blum, A. Li, K. O’Keeffe, and O. Kogan,Swarmala- tors with delayed interactions, Phys. Rev. E109, 014205 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    K. P. O’Keeffe, R. T. Djeudjo, and J. Hindes,Time delay in the 1D swarmalator model, arXiv:2602.08156 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Yadav, R

    A. Yadav, R. Sharma, V. Chandrasekar, and D. Senthilkumar, Phys. Rev. E111, 014313 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Yadav, R

    A. Yadav, R. Sharma, V. Chandrasekar, and D. Senthilkumar, Phys. Rev. E109, 044212 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    G. K. Sar, K. O’Keeffe, and D. Ghosh,Dynamics of swar- malators in the presence of a contrarian, Phys. Rev. E 111, 014209 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    J.-B. Gou, M. Timme, X. Zhang, and G. Yan,Topological swarmalators, Phys. Rev. Research8, 013060 (2026)

    2026

  31. [31]

    Adler,A study of locking phenomena in oscillators, Proc

    R. Adler,A study of locking phenomena in oscillators, Proc. IRE34, 351 (1946)

    1946

  32. [32]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, 2nd ed. (Westview Press, 2014)

    2014

  33. [33]

    Vicsek, A

    T. Vicsek, A. Czir´ ok, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet,Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1226 (1995)

    1995

  34. [34]

    Czir´ ok, A.-L

    A. Czir´ ok, A.-L. Barab´ asi, and T. Vicsek,Collective mo- tion of self-propelled particles: Kinetic phase transition in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 209 (1999)

    1999

  35. [35]

    Chat´ e, F

    H. Chat´ e, F. Ginelli, G. Gr´ egoire, and F. Raynaud,Col- lective motion of self-propelled particles interacting with- out cohesion, Phys. Rev. E77, 046113 (2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    Ginelli and H

    F. Ginelli and H. Chat´ e,Relevance of metric-free inter- actions in flocking phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 168103 (2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis,Collective behavior of chiral active matter: Pattern formation and enhanced flocking, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 058002 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    Codina, B

    J. Codina, B. Mahault, H. Chat´ e, J. Dobnikar, I. Pago- nabarraga, and X.-Q. Shi,Small obstacle in a large polar flock, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 218001 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Wioland, E

    H. Wioland, E. Lushi, and R. E. Goldstein,Directed collective motion of bacteria under channel confinement, New J. Phys.18, 075002 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    Creppy, F

    A. Creppy, F. Plourabou´ e, O. Praud, X. Druart, S. Cazin, H. Yu, and P. Degond,Symmetry-breaking phase transi- tions in highly concentrated semen, J. R. Soc. Interface 13, 20160575 (2016)

    2016