pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10505 · v1 · pith:UQMWHZKZnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · physics.plasm-ph· physics.space-ph

Solar flare ribbons structured by uncombed chromospheric loops

L. P. Chitta , E. R. Priest , David Orozco Su\'arez , Azaymi L. Siu-Tapia , Jose Carlos del Toro Iniesta , Francisco Javier Bail\'en , Julian Blanco Rodr\'iguez , Alberto \'Alvarez-Herrero
show 28 more authors
Maria Balaguer Jim\'enez Esteban Sanchis Kilders Ignacio Torralbo Christoph Kuckein Sami K. Solanki Andreas Lagg Achim Gandorfer Yukio Katsukawa Pietro Bernasconi Thomas Berkefeld Alex Feller Tino L. Riethm\"uller Masahito Kubo H. N. Smitha Bianca Grauf Michael Carpenter Alexander Bell Valent\'in Mart\'inez Pillet Juan Sebasti\'an Castellanos Dur\'an Edvarda Harnes Johannes Hoelken Francisco A. Iglesias Ryohtaroh T. Ishikawa Yusuke Kawabata Takuma Matsumoto Takayoshi Oba Hanna Strecker Du\v{s}an Vukadinovi\'c
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR physics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph
keywords solar flareschromospheric loopsflare ribbonsspectral observationsenergy depositionmagnetic fine structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Uncombed chromospheric loops intersperse with flare ribbon threads and may spatially modulate flare energy deposition in the lower atmosphere.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

High-resolution spectral observations from a balloon-borne magnetograph show that solar flare ribbons contain stable uncombed chromospheric loops and non-flaring fine structures mixed among brighter flaring threads. These loops persist for minutes and produce reduced emission or self-reversal in the cores of the Fe I 5250.6 Å and Mg I b2 5173 Å lines. The paper argues that these ambient structures, separate from the flaring current sheet, help determine the spatial pattern of energy deposition at the chromosphere. This finding links the pre-flare magnetic environment directly to the observed fine structure of ribbons on scales of about 100 km.

Core claim

The paper reports that uncombed chromospheric loops remain stable on timescales of minutes during a flare and appear interspersed with brighter flare ribbon threads. Spectral lines from these loops show reduced emission or self-reversal in the line core relative to immediately adjacent flaring regions. The authors conclude that these pre-existing structures play a role in spatially modulating the deposition of flare energy in the lower atmosphere, irrespective of complexities in the flaring current sheet.

What carries the argument

uncombed chromospheric loops: stable, non-flaring magnetic structures in the chromosphere identified by their distinct spectral signatures of reduced line-core emission and interspersed among flare ribbon threads.

If this is right

  • Flare ribbon fine structure on 100 km scales arises in part from the pre-existing chromospheric magnetic topology rather than solely from tearing instabilities in the current sheet.
  • Spectral line profiles can be used to separate flaring and non-flaring threads within the same ribbon.
  • The spatial pattern of energy deposition during flares is influenced by the ambient uncombed loops.
  • The onset and evolution of flares may depend on the presence and stability of these interspersed non-flaring structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Flare models that treat the lower atmosphere as a uniform boundary may need to incorporate the interaction with pre-flare chromospheric loops to match observed ribbon structure.
  • Repeated high-resolution spectral mapping of multiple flares could test whether the interspersing of uncombed loops is a general feature or specific to certain active regions.
  • The observation suggests a direct observational bridge between idealized current-sheet simulations and the complex, structured energy release seen in real solar events.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral signatures of reduced emission or self-reversal in the Fe I and Mg I lines reliably mark stable non-flaring loops that are distinct from the flare ribbon threads.

What would settle it

Time-series spectra showing that the reduced-emission regions brighten and join the flaring process on timescales shorter than a few minutes would undermine the claim that they are stable non-flaring loops.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10505 by Achim Gandorfer, Alberto \'Alvarez-Herrero, Alexander Bell, Alex Feller, Andreas Lagg, Azaymi L. Siu-Tapia, Bianca Grauf, Christoph Kuckein, David Orozco Su\'arez, Du\v{s}an Vukadinovi\'c, Edvarda Harnes, E. R. Priest, Esteban Sanchis Kilders, Francisco A. Iglesias, Francisco Javier Bail\'en, Hanna Strecker, H. N. Smitha, Ignacio Torralbo, Johannes Hoelken, Jose Carlos del Toro Iniesta, Juan Sebasti\'an Castellanos Dur\'an, Julian Blanco Rodr\'iguez, L. P. Chitta, Maria Balaguer Jim\'enez, Masahito Kubo, Michael Carpenter, Pietro Bernasconi, Ryohtaroh T. Ishikawa, Sami K. Solanki, Takayoshi Oba, Takuma Matsumoto, Thomas Berkefeld, Tino L. Riethm\"uller, Valent\'in Mart\'inez Pillet, Yukio Katsukawa, Yusuke Kawabata.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Lower atmospheric overview of the M5 class flare on 2024 July 13 UT 12:30. (a) SDO/HMI continuum intensity map of AR13738. North is oriented up. The slanted black box is the TuMag field of view covering a section of the leading polarity of active region. (b) TuMag continuum intensity map at 0.227 ˚A away from the Fe i 5250.6 ˚A line. (c) TuMag blue-wing Stokes V signal, normalized to the continuum intensit… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of the flare emission. Upper panel: Spatially averaged Mg i b2 line core intensities, normalized to the local continuum intensities, from the four ribbon lo￾cations (red boxes R1–R4 in Fig. 1d) are plotted as functions of time with corresponding red colored line styles. The blue curve is the Fe i 5250.6 ˚A line red-wing intensity normalized to the local continuum at ribbon location R3. Lower pane… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Chromospheric and magnetic substructure at the site of flare energy deposition. (a) Zoom into the northern ribbon region. This field of view is also outlined by a white square in Fig. 1d. The circle and diamond symbols are overlaid on different Mg i b2 line core features. The red colored symbols overlie the locations that exhibit signatures of flare energy deposition. The cyan symbols overlie the uncombed … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Subtle nature of the nonflaring fine-structure. The field of view is the same as in Fig. 5a. Sequences of Mg line core maps (upper panels) and Fe i normalized Stokes V maps (lower panels) are plotted. The arrow points to the chromospheric nonflaring fine-structure overlying a potential mixed-polarity or a twisted magnetic structure in a penumbral filament. 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The main result of ou… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Chromospheric and coronal overview of the flaring region. (a) CHASE Hα line core intensity covering the same field of view as in Fig. 1a. (b) Map of the coronal emission recorded by the SDO/AIA 193 ˚A passband on a square-root intensity scale. In both panels the white square outlines the field of view of the TuMag map shown in Fig. 1b–d. The cooler filament and hotter flux rope features are marked. The cya… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simplified illustration of the spatial configura￾tion of the uncombed chromospheric loops within the flare. Flaring loops (blue) and their footpoints indicative of rib￾bons (red), connected to a pair of opposite polarity mag￾netic field patches (regions labeled + and −), are depicted. The lower-lying cyan colored loops indicate nonflaring un￾combed chromospheric loops that are interspersed with the flare r… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A part of the magnetic energy released during a flare is transported to the lower atmosphere. High-resolution observations show that flare ribbons, sites of energy deposition at the footpoints of flaring loops which appear bright in the chromosphere and transition region, are structured on small spatial scales on the order of 100 km. Based on idealized numerical models of flares it is suggested that the ribbon fine-structures could originate from a tearing instability and the development of plasmoids in current sheets. Here we report on Fe I 5250.6 {\AA} and Mg I b2 5173 {\AA} spectral observations of a solar flare from the Tunable Magnetograph onboard the SUNRISE III balloon-borne mission that reveal an intricate link between the flare ribbon structure and the ambient chromosphere. We identified uncombed chromospheric loops and non-flaring fine-structures that are interspersed among brighter flare ribbon threads. These loops remain stable on timescales of minutes. Spectral lines from these regions show reduced emission or self-reversal in the line core compared with the immediately adjacent flare ribbons. We discuss the potential role of these structures in the onset of a flare. Furthermore, we suggest that irrespective of the complexities in the flaring current sheet, uncombed chromospheric loops and nonflaring fine-structure might play a role in spatially modulating the flare energy deposition in the lower atmosphere.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper reports high-resolution Fe I 5250.6 Å and Mg I b2 5173 Å spectral observations of a solar flare from the SUNRISE III Tunable Magnetograph. It identifies uncombed chromospheric loops and non-flaring fine-structures interspersed among brighter flare ribbon threads, distinguished by reduced emission or self-reversal in the line cores, with these structures remaining stable on minute timescales. The authors suggest these ambient structures may spatially modulate flare energy deposition in the lower atmosphere, irrespective of flaring current-sheet complexities.

Significance. If the spectral distinctions reliably separate non-flaring structures from flare threads, the result would indicate that pre-existing chromospheric fine structure can influence the spatial pattern of energy deposition during flares. This provides an observational anchor for interpreting ribbon fine-structure in high-resolution data and could guide refinements to models that currently emphasize tearing instabilities or plasmoids without incorporating ambient loop geometry.

major comments (2)
  1. [spectral observations paragraph] Abstract, paragraph on spectral observations: the identification of stable non-flaring uncombed loops rests on qualitative line-core differences (reduced emission or self-reversal) without reported quantitative thresholds, error bars, or modulation metrics; this weakens the load-bearing step from observation to the suggested modulating role.
  2. [spectral observations paragraph] Abstract, paragraph on spectral observations: full data-reduction steps, instrumental calibration, and temporal stability quantification are not described, leaving open whether the reported minute-scale stability and spatial interspersing are robust against reduction choices or seeing residuals.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation of the observational results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [spectral observations paragraph] Abstract, paragraph on spectral observations: the identification of stable non-flaring uncombed loops rests on qualitative line-core differences (reduced emission or self-reversal) without reported quantitative thresholds, error bars, or modulation metrics; this weakens the load-bearing step from observation to the suggested modulating role.

    Authors: The identification in the abstract is indeed based on consistent qualitative differences in the line-core profiles (self-reversal or reduced emission) visible in the high-resolution spectra, as illustrated in the figures comparing adjacent structures. These differences are spatially coherent and persist across the time series. While the abstract does not include explicit numerical thresholds, the main text and figures provide the supporting spectral examples. We will revise the abstract to explicitly note that the distinction relies on these observed line-core characteristics and will add a short quantitative metric (e.g., core-to-wing intensity ratio) in the results section to better support the modulating-role interpretation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [spectral observations paragraph] Abstract, paragraph on spectral observations: full data-reduction steps, instrumental calibration, and temporal stability quantification are not described, leaving open whether the reported minute-scale stability and spatial interspersing are robust against reduction choices or seeing residuals.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary and does not contain the full reduction pipeline; those steps are detailed in the methods section with references to the SUNRISE III instrument calibration papers. Temporal stability was assessed by co-aligning successive frames and tracking the same dark structures over several minutes. We will add a brief sentence to the abstract summarizing the key calibration and the stability criterion used (persistence in co-aligned time series), and we will expand the methods paragraph to include explicit quantification of the stability timescale and residual seeing checks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: purely observational report

full rationale

The paper is an observational study reporting spectral signatures from SUNRISE III data. It identifies structures via line-core differences in Fe I and Mg I lines and offers a tentative suggestion about possible modulation of energy deposition. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions are present. No self-citations are used to justify load-bearing claims. The central statement is framed as a hypothesis ('might play a role') rather than a derived result. The derivation chain is empty; all content is direct reporting of observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Observational study with no free parameters or invented entities; relies on standard domain assumptions about spectral line formation in the solar chromosphere.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spectral line profiles showing reduced emission or self-reversal indicate non-flaring chromospheric structures distinct from flare ribbons
    Invoked to classify observed fine structures as uncombed loops (abstract, spectral observations paragraph)

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5997 in / 1162 out tokens · 25825 ms · 2026-06-27T12:04:54.758457+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K., DeVore, C

    Antiochos, S. K., DeVore, C. R., & Klimchuk, J. A. 1999, ApJ, 510, 485, doi: 10.1086/306563

    work page doi:10.1086/306563 1999

  2. [2]

    2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 54, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02706-4 Bail´ en, F

    Ashfield, W., Polito, V., L¨ orinˇ c´ ık, J., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 54, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02706-4 Bail´ en, F. J., Orozco Su´ arez, D., Blanco Rodr´ ıguez, J., & del Toro Iniesta, J. C. 2022, ApJS, 263, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac966d 10

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02706-4 2026

  3. [3]

    K., et al

    Barthol, P., Gandorfer, A., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2011, SoPh, 268, 1, doi: 10.1007/s11207-010-9662-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9662-9 2011

  4. [4]

    Benz, A. O. 2017, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 14, 2, doi: 10.1007/s41116-016-0004-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-016-0004-3 2017

  5. [5]

    P., Hannah, I

    Chitta, L. P., Hannah, I. G., Fletcher, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450866

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450866 2024

  6. [6]

    P., Priest, E

    Chitta, L. P., Priest, E. R., & Cheng, X. 2021, ApJ, 911, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abec4d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abec4d 2021

  7. [7]

    P., Peter, H., Parenti, S., et al

    Chitta, L. P., Peter, H., Parenti, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A166, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244170

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244170 2022

  8. [8]

    P., Pontin, D

    Chitta, L. P., Pontin, D. I., Priest, E. R., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557253

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557253 2026

  9. [9]

    A., Purkhart, S., et al

    Collier, H., Hayes, L. A., Purkhart, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A176, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451838 Corchado Albelo, M. F., Kazachenko, M. D., & Lynch, B. J. 2024, ApJ, 965, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad25f4

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451838 2024

  10. [10]

    DeVore, C. R. 2025, ApJ, 993, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae03c5 del Toro Iniesta, J. C., Orozco Su´ arez, D.,´Alvarez-Herrero, A., et al. 2025, SoPh, 300, 148, doi: 10.1007/s11207-025-02562-5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae03c5 2025

  11. [11]

    2024, A&A, 684, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347600 Dud´ ık, J., Polito, V., Janvier, M., et al

    Druett, M., Ruan, W., & Keppens, R. 2024, A&A, 684, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347600 Dud´ ık, J., Polito, V., Janvier, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 41, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/41

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347600 2024

  12. [12]

    G., Hudson, H

    Fletcher, L., Hannah, I. G., Hudson, H. S., & Innes, D. E. 2013, ApJ, 771, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/104

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/771/2/104 2013

  13. [13]

    1998 Data Analysis with the SolarSoft System.Sol

    Freeland, S. L., & Handy, B. N. 1998, SoPh, 182, 497, doi: 10.1023/A:1005038224881

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005038224881 1998

  14. [14]

    J., Kazachenko, M

    French, R. J., Kazachenko, M. D., Berghmans, D., et al. 2025, ApJL, 995, L54, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2684

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae2684 2025

  15. [15]

    D., Chitta, L

    Hu, H., Liu, Y. D., Chitta, L. P., Peter, H., & Ding, M. 2022, ApJL, 940, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9dfd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9dfd 2022

  16. [16]

    2016, Scientific Reports, 6, 24319, doi: 10.1038/srep24319

    Jing, J., Xu, Y., Cao, W., et al. 2016, Scientific Reports, 6, 24319, doi: 10.1038/srep24319

    work page doi:10.1038/srep24319 2016

  17. [17]

    Kazachenko, M. D. 2023, ApJ, 958, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad004e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad004e 2023

  18. [18]

    D., Lynch, B

    Kazachenko, M. D., Lynch, B. J., Welsch, B. T., & Sun, X. 2017, ApJ, 845, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7ed6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7ed6 2017

  19. [19]

    K., et al

    Korpi-Lagg, A., Gandorfer, A., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2025, SoPh, 300, 75, doi: 10.1007/s11207-025-02485-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02485-1 2025

  20. [20]

    2025, A&A, 699, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554798

    Kuckein, C., Collados, M., Asensio Ramos, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554798

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554798 2025

  21. [21]

    R., Title, A

    Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., et al. 2012, SoPh, 275, 17, doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8 2012

  22. [22]

    2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 289602, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1893-3 L¨ orinˇ c´ ık, J., Polito, V., Kerr, G

    Li, C., Fang, C., Li, Z., et al. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 289602, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1893-3 L¨ orinˇ c´ ık, J., Polito, V., Kerr, G. S., Hayes, L. A., &

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-022-1893-3 2022

  23. [23]

    Russell, A. J. B. 2025, ApJ, 986, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adccc8 Mart´ ınez Pillet, V. 2000, A&A, 361, 734

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adccc8 2025

  24. [24]

    J., Avrett, E

    Mauas, P. J., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 1988, ApJ, 330, 1008, doi: 10.1086/166530

    work page doi:10.1086/166530 1988

  25. [25]

    J., Mathioudakis, M., & Kowalski, A

    Monson, A. J., Mathioudakis, M., & Kowalski, A. F. 2024, ApJ, 963, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad16da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad16da 2024

  26. [26]

    L., Sterling, A

    Moore, R. L., Sterling, A. C., Hudson, H. S., & Lemen, J. R. 2001, ApJ, 552, 833, doi: 10.1086/320559

    work page doi:10.1086/320559 2001

  27. [27]

    2014, SoPh, 289, 2945, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0523-9

    Morgan, H., & Druckm¨ uller, M. 2014, SoPh, 289, 2945, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0523-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-014-0523-9 2014

  28. [28]

    2018, ApJ, 861, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac779

    Panos, B., Kleint, L., Huwyler, C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac779

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac779 2018

  29. [29]

    2012 The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO).Sol

    Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C. 2012, SoPh, 275, 3, doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3 2012

  30. [30]

    2022, A&A, 659, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142346

    Calvo, F., & Kiselman, D. 2022, A&A, 659, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142346

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142346 2022

  31. [31]

    Pietrow, A. G. M., Druett, M. K., & Singh, V. 2024, A&A, 685, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348839

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348839 2024

  32. [32]

    S., Xu, Y., Sadykov, V

    Polito, V., Kerr, G. S., Xu, Y., Sadykov, V. M., & Lorincik, J. 2023, ApJ, 944, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaf7c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acaf7c 2023

  33. [33]

    R., & Forbes, T

    Priest, E. R., & Forbes, T. G. 2002, A&A Rv, 10, 313, doi: 10.1007/s001590100013

    work page doi:10.1007/s001590100013 2002

  34. [34]

    2022, SoPh, 297, 80, doi: 10.1007/s11207-022-02003-7

    Qiu, J., & Cheng, J. 2022, SoPh, 297, 80, doi: 10.1007/s11207-022-02003-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-022-02003-7 2022

  35. [35]

    2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 289603, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1900-5

    Qiu, Y., Rao, S., Li, C., et al. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 289603, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1900-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-022-1900-5 2022

  36. [36]

    P., Wang, Y.-M., Muglach, K., & Warren, H

    Reardon, K. P., Wang, Y.-M., Muglach, K., & Warren, H. P. 2011, ApJ, 742, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/119

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/119 2011

  37. [37]

    2023, ApJ, 947, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b4e Rubio da Costa, F., & Kleint, L

    Ruan, W., Yan, L., & Keppens, R. 2023, ApJ, 947, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b4e Rubio da Costa, F., & Kleint, L. 2017, ApJ, 842, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6eaf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b4e 2023

  38. [38]

    J., Leenaarts, J., Rouppe van der Voort, L

    Rutten, R. J., Leenaarts, J., Rouppe van der Voort, L. H. M., et al. 2011, A&A, 531, A17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116984

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116984 2011

  39. [39]

    F., Hayes, L

    Ryan, D. F., Hayes, L. A., Collier, H., et al. 2025, SoPh, 300, 152, doi: 10.1007/s11207-025-02561-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02561-6 2025

  40. [40]

    H., Schou, J., Bush, R

    Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, SoPh, 275, 207, doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2 2012

  41. [41]

    2011, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 8, 6, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2011-6

    Shibata, K., & Magara, T. 2011, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 8, 6, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2011-6

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2011-6 2011

  42. [42]

    L., Bellot Rubio, L

    Siu-Tapia, A. L., Bellot Rubio, L. R., & Orozco Su´ arez, D. 2025a, A&A, 696, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453230 11

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453230

  43. [43]

    2025b, A&A, 696, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453232

    Gafeira, R. 2025b, A&A, 696, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453232

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453232

  44. [44]

    K., & Montavon, C

    Solanki, S. K., & Montavon, C. A. P. 1993, A&A, 275, 283

    1993

  45. [45]

    K., Barthol, P., Danilovic, S., et al

    Solanki, S. K., Barthol, P., Danilovic, S., et al. 2010, ApJL, 723, L127, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/723/2/L127

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/723/2/l127 2010

  46. [46]

    K., Riethm¨ uller, T

    Solanki, S. K., Riethm¨ uller, T. L., Barthol, P., et al. 2017, ApJS, 229, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/229/1/2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/229/1/2 2017

  47. [47]

    K., Smitha, H

    Solanki, S. K., Smitha, H. N., Lagg, A., et al. 2026, Sunrise III: Instrument, mission, data, and first results, https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07989

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    A., Kazachenko, M

    Tamburri, C. A., Kazachenko, M. D., Cauzzi, G., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf95e Thoen Faber, J., Joshi, R., Rouppe van der Voort, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452370

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf95e 2025

  49. [49]

    F., & Pontin, D

    Wyper, P. F., & Pontin, D. I. 2021, ApJ, 920, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1943

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1943 2021

  50. [50]

    R., Doschek, G

    Young, P. R., Doschek, G. A., Warren, H. P., & Hara, H. 2013, ApJ, 766, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/127

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/127 2013