Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 cited by

Hidden-sectors search and probe of discrete symmetries at the REDTOP experiment

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The proposed facility collecting 10^14 eta mesons enables searches for hidden sector physics and tests of discrete symmetries.

desk verdict REDTOP is a forward-looking proposal for 10^14 eta statistics targeting four BSM portals plus symmetry tests, but the sensitivity numbers rest on unshown detector and background studies. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.12158 v2 pith:3ZMAPCJK submitted 2026-06-10 hep-ex hep-ph

The REDTOP COllaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exhep-ph
keywords etadecayshiddensectorsbeyondstandardmodelCPviolationTinvarianceleptonuniversalitytransitionformfactorsmuong-2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper evaluates how a proposed facility collecting O(10^14) eta and O(10^12) eta-prime mesons can search for physics beyond the standard model. The studies assess sensitivity to new particles coupling through the vector, scalar, axion-like and heavy lepton portals. The statistics also enable precise tests of charge parity and time reversal invariance as well as lepton universality. They further improve the eta and eta-prime transition form factors needed for accurate calculations of the muon anomalous magnetic moment. This scale is much larger than previous experiments which collected around 10^9 eta events.

What carries the argument

The high event rates of eta and eta-prime meson decays, which act as sensitive probes for new physics because their decay dynamics are strongly constrained as nearly Goldstone bosons.

What would settle it

If background rejection proves insufficient or the number of collected eta events falls well below 10^14, the claimed sensitivities for rare processes would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The proposed facility targets O(10^14) eta and O(10^12) eta-prime mesons, enabling broad searches for physics beyond the Standard Model through the vector, scalar, axion-like, and heavy lepton portals, while also allowing precise tests of CP and T invariance and lepton universality and improving the eta and eta-prime transition form factors crucial for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment.

Load-bearing premise

The sensitivity projections assume the experimental setup achieves the required event rates and background rejection without significant systematic uncertainties dominating.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Searches for dark photons via the vector portal reach new sensitivity levels.
  • Higgs-mixing scalars can be probed via the scalar portal.
  • Axion-like particles become accessible via the axion-like portal.
  • Heavy leptons can be searched via the heavy lepton portal.
  • Precision tests of CP and T invariance and lepton universality become possible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The improved form factors could help resolve tensions in the calculation of the muon g-2 if they are a limiting factor.
  • Such an experiment could serve as a complement to direct searches at colliders for hidden sector particles.
  • The portal framework allows systematic coverage of different types of new physics couplings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the REDTOP facility to collect O(10^14) η and O(10^12) η' events, enabling searches for BSM physics through the Vector (dark photon), Scalar (Higgs-mixing), Axion-like, and Heavy Lepton portals, together with precision tests of CP and T invariance, lepton universality, and improved η/η' transition form factors relevant to (g-2)_μ.

Significance. If the projected event samples and background rejection can be realized, the statistics would represent a two-to-five order-of-magnitude advance over existing η/η' data sets and could meaningfully constrain hidden-sector models while supplying improved inputs to the hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g-2)_μ. The manuscript, however, supplies no supporting calculations, efficiencies, or background models, so the significance cannot yet be evaluated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'studies evaluating REDTOP sensitivity to processes that couple the Standard Model to New Physics through four portals' have been performed is unsupported; no production rates, luminosities, efficiencies, background models, or systematic-error budgets are shown, rendering the claimed reaches for portal-mediated rare decays unverifiable.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that O(10^14) η statistics will enable the listed symmetry tests and form-factor improvements assumes that systematic uncertainties remain sub-dominant, yet no error analysis or background-rejection study is provided to justify this assumption.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We agree that the abstract requires revision to align more closely with the content of the manuscript, which is a high-level proposal outlining projected capabilities rather than a detailed sensitivity analysis with full simulations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'studies evaluating REDTOP sensitivity to processes that couple the Standard Model to New Physics through four portals' have been performed is unsupported; no production rates, luminosities, efficiencies, background models, or systematic-error budgets are shown, rendering the claimed reaches for portal-mediated rare decays unverifiable.

    Authors: We agree that the phrasing in the abstract implies a level of detailed supporting calculations that is not present in the manuscript. The projections are based on the targeted event yields and order-of-magnitude assumptions about acceptance and efficiency. We will revise the abstract to state that the reaches are estimated from the projected statistics under standard assumptions for detector performance, without claiming that full studies with production rates, background models, or systematic budgets have been completed in this work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that O(10^14) η statistics will enable the listed symmetry tests and form-factor improvements assumes that systematic uncertainties remain sub-dominant, yet no error analysis or background-rejection study is provided to justify this assumption.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the manuscript does not provide an error analysis or background-rejection study to support the assumption that systematics remain sub-dominant. The large statistics are presented as the primary enabling factor, but control of systematics is indeed essential. We will revise the abstract to qualify the expected improvements as contingent on successful management of systematic uncertainties through the experimental design, and we will add a brief discussion in the main text on the detector features intended to suppress backgrounds and control systematics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: forward-looking sensitivity projections with no derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

The manuscript is a proposal paper presenting sensitivity estimates for rare decays and symmetry tests at a future facility. No equations, parameter fits, or derivations are described that reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatze. The content consists of projected reach statements based on assumed statistics, which are external benchmarks rather than tautological redefinitions. This matches the default expectation of no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract introduces no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies on standard BSM portal models and experimental assumptions not detailed here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hidden-sectors search and probe of discrete symmetries at the REDTOP experiment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3ZMAPCJK

@misc{pith2026260612158,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hidden-sectors search and probe of discrete symmetries at the REDTOP experiment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3ZMAPCJK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.12158}
}
abstract

The $\eta$ and $\eta^{\prime}$ mesons are nearly unique in the particle universe since they are nearly Goldstone bosons, and their decay dynamics are strongly constrained. While earlier experiments collected samples of order $\sim 10^{9}$ $\eta$, the proposed REDTOP (Rare Eta Decays To Observe Physics Beyond the Standard Model) facility targets $\mathcal{O}(10^{14})$ $\eta$ and $\mathcal{O}(10^{12})$ $\eta'$, enabling broad searches for physics beyond the Standard Model. In this work, we present studies evaluating REDTOP sensitivity to processes that couple the Standard Model to New Physics through four portals: the Vector (dark photon), the Scalar (Higgs-mixing), the Axion-like, and the Heavy Lepton. In parallel, the proposed statistics allow precise tests of $CP$ and $T$ invariance and lepton universality and improve determinations of the $\eta/\eta'$ transition form factors, which are crucial inputs to the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment $(g-2)_\mu$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Correlated low-energy constants in large-$N_c$ chiral perturbation theory

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In large-Nc chiral perturbation theory, the decay constant depends on a single correlated combination of F0, L4, and C16, so phenomenological fits constrain directions rather than independent low-energy constants.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Novel two component dark matter features in the Z2 × Z2 3HDM

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck Collaboration], Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020) [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]], [Erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and Y . Nir, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 345 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0202058]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    Matter and Antimatter in the Universe

    L. Canetti, M. Drewes, and M. Shaposhnikov, New J. Phys. 14, 095012 (2012) [arXiv:1204.4186 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    A. D. Sakharov, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967)

    1967

  5. [5]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Physics Reports 405, 279 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0404175]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    A New Era in the Quest for Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and T. M. P . Tait,Nature 562, 51 (2018) [arXiv:1810.01668]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Tuominen, Symmetry 13, 1945 (2021)

    K. Tuominen, Symmetry 13, 1945 (2021)

    1945

  8. [8]

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton, and M. G. Haehnelt, Phys. Rev. D 88, 043502 (2013) [arXiv:1306.2314]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

Show all 166 references
  1. [9]

    Griest and M

    K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 615 (1990)

    1990

  2. [10]

    T.-H. Y eh, J. Shelton, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, JCAP 10, 046 (2022) [arXiv:2207.13133 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022

  3. [11]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. [XENON Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018) [arXiv:1805.12562 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [A TLAS Collaboration],Phys. Rev. D 103, 112006 (2021) [arXiv:2102.10874 [hep-ex]]

    2021

  5. [13]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], JHEP 07, 208 (2021) [arXiv:2103.02708 [hep-ex]]

    2021

  6. [14]

    Boehm and P

    C. Boehm and P . Fayet, Nucl. Phys. B 683, 219 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0305261]

    2004 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Pospelov, A

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. V oloshin, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008) [arXiv:0711.4866 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Knapen, T

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115021 (2017) [arXiv:1709.07882 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report,

    J. Alexander et al., “Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report,” 2016. arXiv:1608.08632 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Beacham et al., J

    J. Beacham et al., J. Phys. G 47, 010501 (2020) [arXiv:1901.09966 [hep-ex]]

    2020

  11. [19]

    Batell, M

    B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095024 (2009) [arXiv:0906.5614 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles,

    R. Essig et al., “Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles,” in Snowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi . 2013. arXiv:1311.0029 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier . 2012. arXiv:1205.2671 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Goldberg, Phys

    H. Goldberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1419 (1983) , [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 099905 (2009)]

    1983

  15. [23]

    J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V . Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B 238, 453 (1984)

    1984

  16. [24]

    J. L. Feng, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48, 495 (2010) [arXiv:1003.0904 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. [Particle Data Group], Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Feldmann, Int

    T. Feldmann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 159 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9907491]

    2000 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B 250, 465 (1985)

    1985

  20. [28]

    Escribano, P

    R. Escribano, P . Masjuan, and P . Sánchez-Puertas, Phys. Rev. D 89, 034014 (2014) [arXiv:1307.2061 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    L. Gan, B. Kubis, E. Passemar, and S. Tulin, Phys. Rept. 945, 2191 (2022) [arXiv:2007.00664 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  22. [30]

    Patt and F

    B. Patt and F. Wilczek [ arXiv:hep-ph/0605188]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Holdom, Phys

    B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B 166, 196 (1986)

    1986

  24. [32]

    Arkani-Hamed, D

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P . Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 79, 015014 (2009) [arXiv:0810.0713 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Jaeckel and A

    J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 405 (2010) [arXiv:1002.0329 [hep-ph]]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, and A. Thamm, JHEP 12, 044 (2017) [arXiv:1708.00443 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Minkowski,Phys

    P . Minkowski,Phys. Lett. B 67, 421 (1977)

    1977

  28. [36]

    Boyarsky, O

    A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, and M. Shaposhnikov, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59, 191 (2009) [arXiv:0901.0011 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  29. [37]

    T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. 139, B1415 (1965)

    1965

  30. [38]

    Anastasi et al

    A. Anastasi et al. [KLOE-2 Collaboration], JHEP 05, 019 (2016) [arXiv:1601.06985 [hep-ex]]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gardner and J

    S. Gardner and J. Shi, Phys. Rev. D 101, 115038 (2020) [arXiv:1903.11617 [hep-ph]]

    2020

  32. [40]

    Akdag, T

    H. Akdag, T. Isken, and B. Kubis, JHEP 02, 137 (2022) [arXiv:2111.02417 [hep-ph]], [Erratum: JHEP 12, 156 (2022)]

    2022

  33. [41]

    Akdag, B

    H. Akdag, B. Kubis, and A. Wirzba, JHEP 06, 154 (2023) [arXiv:2212.07794 [hep-ph]]

    2023

  34. [42]

    J. Shi, J. Liang, and S. Gardner, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055039 (2024) [arXiv:2407.08766 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  35. [43]

    Zillinger, B

    M. Zillinger, B. Kubis, and P . Sánchez-Puertas, JHEP 12, 001 (2022) [arXiv:2210.14925 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  36. [44]

    Escribano, E

    R. Escribano, E. Royo, and P . Sánchez-Puertas, JHEP 05, 147 (2022) [arXiv:2202.04886 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  37. [45]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 87, 092011 (2013) [arXiv:1303.7360 [hep-ex]]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 103, 072006 (2021) [arXiv:2012.04257 [hep-ex]]. 28

    2021

  39. [47]

    C. Q. Geng and J. N. Ng, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1509 (1990)

    1990

  40. [48]

    Sánchez-Puertas,JHEP 01, 031 (2019) [arXiv:1810.13228 [hep-ph]]

    P . Sánchez-Puertas,JHEP 01, 031 (2019) [arXiv:1810.13228 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Fayet,Nucl

    P . Fayet,Nucl. Phys. B 347, 743 (1990)

    1990

  42. [50]

    Fayet,Phys

    P . Fayet,Phys. Rev. D 75, 115017 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0702176]

    2007 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. L. Feng and J. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 231301 (2008) [arXiv:0803.4196 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Reece and L.-T

    M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, JHEP 07, 051 (2009) [arXiv:0904.1743 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Agakishiev et al

    G. Agakishiev et al. [HADES Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 731, 265 (2014) [arXiv:1311.0216 [hep-ex]]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Adlarsonet al

    P . Adlarsonet al. [W ASA-at-COSY Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 726, 187 (2013) [arXiv:1304.0671 [hep-ex]]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Archilli et al

    F. Archilli et al. [KLOE-2 Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 706, 251 (2012) [arXiv:1110.0411 [hep-ex]]

    2012 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Döbrich, F

    B. Döbrich, F. Ertas, F. Kahlhoefer, and T. Spadaro, Phys. Lett. B 790, 537 (2019) [arXiv:1810.11336 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977)

    1977

  50. [58]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977)

    1977

  51. [59]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

    1978

  52. [60]

    Wilczek, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  53. [61]

    Aloni, Y

    D. Aloni, Y . Soreq, and M. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 031803 (2019) [arXiv:1811.03474 [hep-ph]]

    2019

  54. [62]

    D. S. M. Alves and N. Weiner, JHEP 07, 092 (2018) [arXiv:1710.03764 [hep-ph]]

    2018

  55. [63]

    D. S. M. Alves, Phys. Rev. D 103, 055018 (2021) [arXiv:2009.05578 [hep-ph]]

    2021

  56. [64]

    D. S. M. Alves and S. Gonzàlez-Solís, JHEP 07, 264 (2024) [arXiv:2402.02993 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  57. [65]

    Y . Ema, F. Sala, and R. Sato, SciPost Phys. 10, 072 (2021) [arXiv:2011.01939 [hep-ph]]

    2021

  58. [66]

    Gatto [REDTOP Collaboration] [arXiv:1910.08505 [physics.ins-det]]

    C. Gatto [REDTOP Collaboration] [arXiv:1910.08505 [physics.ins-det]]

    1910

  59. [67]

    A. A. Alves, Jr. et al. [LHCb Collaboration], JINST 3, S08005 (2008)

    2008

  60. [68]

    HERA-B: Report on status and prospects October 2000. Executive summary,

    [HERA-B Collaboration], “HERA-B: Report on status and prospects October 2000. Executive summary,” 2000

    2000

  61. [69]

    Agostinelli et al

    S. Agostinelli et al. [GEANT4 Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003)

    2003

  62. [70]

    S. A. Bass et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255 (1998) [arXiv:nucl-th/9803035]

    1998 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Bleicher et al., J

    M. Bleicher et al., J. Phys. G 25, 1859 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9909407]

    1999 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Prakhov et al

    S. Prakhov et al. [Crystal Ball Collaboration], Phys. Rev. C 69, 045202 (2004)

    2004

  65. [73]

    Arndt et al

    K. Arndt et al. [Mu3e Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1014, 165679 (2021) [arXiv:2009.11690 [physics.ins-det]]

    2021

  66. [74]

    Abt et al

    I. Abt et al. [H1 Collaboration], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 386, 348 (1997)

    1997

  67. [75]

    Aaij et al., JINST 9, P09007 (2014) [arXiv:1405.7808 [physics.ins-det]]

    R. Aaij et al., JINST 9, P09007 (2014) [arXiv:1405.7808 [physics.ins-det]]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Research proposal for an experiment to search for the decay µ → eee,

    A. Blondel et al., “Research proposal for an experiment to search for the decay µ → eee,” 12,

  69. [77]

    https: //www.psi.ch/sites/default/files/import/ mu3e/DocumentsEN/ResearchProposal.pdf

  70. [78]

    The Mu3e experiment: Toward the construction of an HV -MAPS vertex detector,

    T. Rudzki et al., “The Mu3e experiment: Toward the construction of an HV -MAPS vertex detector,” in International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders . 6, 2021. arXiv:2106.03534 [physics.ins-det]

    2021

  71. [79]

    A high-granularity timing detector for the atlas phase-ii upgrade,

    A TLAS Collaboration, “A high-granularity timing detector for the atlas phase-ii upgrade,” 2020. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2719855

    2020

  72. [80]

    A MIP Timing Detector for the CMS Phase-2 Upgrade,

    CMS Collaboration, “A MIP Timing Detector for the CMS Phase-2 Upgrade,” 2019. http://cds.cern.ch/record/2667167

    2019

  73. [81]

    Gatto, V

    C. Gatto, V . Di Benedetto, and A. Mazzacane [T1015 Collaboration], J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 404, 012030 (2012)

    2012

  74. [82]

    Gatto, V

    C. Gatto, V . Di Benedetto, and A. Mazzacane [T1015 Collaboration], J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 587, 012060 (2015)

    2015

  75. [83]

    D. A. Brown et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1 (2018)

    2018

  76. [84]

    Leinweber et al., Nucl

    G. Leinweber et al., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 154, 261 (2006)

    2006

  77. [85]

    A. J. M. Plompen et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 181 (2020)

    2020

  78. [86]

    The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Tracker,

    [CMS Collaboration], A. Tumasyan et al., “The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Tracker,” 2017. https://doi.org/10.17181/CERN.QZ28.FLHW

    2017 doi

  79. [87]

    Technical Design Report for the A TLAS Inner Tracker Pixel Detector,

    [A TLAS Collaboration], “Technical Design Report for the A TLAS Inner Tracker Pixel Detector,” 2017. https://doi.org/10.17181/CERN.FOZZ.ZP3Q

    2017 doi

  80. [88]

    Bouyjou et al., J

    F. Bouyjou et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2374, 012070 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    Albuquerque et al., JINST 19, P05048 (2024) [arXiv:2404.01208 [physics.ins-det]]

    E. Albuquerque et al., JINST 19, P05048 (2024) [arXiv:2404.01208 [physics.ins-det]]

    2024

  82. [90]

    Bertani et al., Nucl

    M. Bertani et al., Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 78, 553 (1999)

    1999

  83. [91]

    Belyaev, G

    I. Belyaev, G. Carboni, N. Harnew, C. Matteuzzi, and F. Teubert, Eur. Phys. J. H 46, 3 (2021) [arXiv:2101.05331 [physics.hist-ph]]

    2021

  84. [92]

    Development of 3D V ertically Integrated Pattern Recognition Associative Memory (VIPRAM),

    G. Deputch et al., “Development of 3D V ertically Integrated Pattern Recognition Associative Memory (VIPRAM),” 2011. https://doi.org/10.2172/1031164

    2011 doi

  85. [93]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Annals Phys. 158, 142 (1984). 29

    1984

  86. [94]

    Ahdida et al

    C. Ahdida et al. [SHiP Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 486 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01487 [physics.ins-det]]

    2022

  87. [95]

    Chen et al., Nucl

    X. Chen et al., Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 137 (2025) [arXiv:2407.00874 [hep-ph]]

    2025

  88. [96]

    Tulin, Phys

    S. Tulin, Phys. Rev. D 89, 114008 (2014) [arXiv:1404.4370 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Escribano, S

    R. Escribano, S. Gonzàlez-Solís, R. Jora, and E. Royo, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034026 (2020) [arXiv:1812.08454 [hep-ph]]

    2020

  90. [98]

    Escribano, S

    R. Escribano, S. Gonzàlez-Solís, and E. Royo, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114007 (2022) [arXiv:2207.14263 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  91. [99]

    Escribano, S

    R. Escribano, S. Gonzàlez-Solís, and E. Royo, Phys. Rev. D 112, 114009 (2025) [arXiv:2510.00787 [hep-ph]]

    2025

  92. [100]

    J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P . Tait, and P . Tanedo,Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 071803 (2016) [arXiv:1604.07411 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  93. [101]

    J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P . Tait, and P . Tanedo,Phys. Rev. D 95, 035017 (2017) [arXiv:1608.03591 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Egana-Ugrinovic, S

    D. Egana-Ugrinovic, S. Homiller, and P . Meade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 031802 (2019)

    2019

  95. [103]

    Batell, A

    B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, D. McKeen, and M. Rai, Phys. Rev. D 104, 115032 (2021) [arXiv:2107.08059 [hep-ph]]

    2021

  96. [104]

    Abdallah, R

    W. Abdallah, R. Gandhi, and S. Roy, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055028 (2021) [arXiv:2010.06159 [hep-ph]]

    2021

  97. [105]

    Batell, A

    B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, and D. Mckeen, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095020 (2019) [arXiv:1812.05103 [hep-ph]]

    2019

  98. [106]

    Byckling and K

    E. Byckling and K. Kajantie, Particle Kinematics, University of Jyvaskyla, 1971

    1971

  99. [107]

    Kling and S

    F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035012 (2021) [arXiv:2105.07077 [hep-ph]]

    2021

  100. [108]

    J. E. Kim and G. Carosi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 557 (2010) [arXiv:0807.3125 [hep-ph]], [Erratum: Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 049902 (2019)]

    2010

  101. [109]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, Phys. Rept. 870, 1 (2020) [arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081803 (2021) [arXiv:2102.13112 [hep-ph]]

    2021

  103. [111]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 042501 (2016) [arXiv:1504.01527 [nucl-ex]]

    2016 arXiv

  104. [112]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen, and D. J. Gross, Phys. Lett. B 63, 334 (1976)

    1976

  105. [113]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen, and D. J. Gross, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2717 (1978)

    1978

  106. [114]

    Höcker and Z

    A. Höcker and Z. Ligeti, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 501 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0605217]

    2006 arXiv

  107. [115]

    A. J. Buras, Prog. Theor. Phys. 122, 145 (2009) [arXiv:0904.4917 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Annals Phys. 318, 119 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0504231]

    2005 arXiv

  109. [117]

    J. G. Layter, J. A. Appel, A. Kotlewski, W.-Y . Lee, S. Stein, and J. J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 316 (1972)

    1972

  110. [118]

    Zielinski, PhD thesis, Jagiellonian U (2012), arXiv:1301.0098 [hep-ex]

    M. Zielinski, PhD thesis, Jagiellonian U (2012), arXiv:1301.0098 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Akdag, B

    H. Akdag, B. Kubis, and A. Wirzba, JHEP 03, 059 (2024) [arXiv:2307.02533 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  112. [120]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B 250, 539 (1985)

    1985

  113. [121]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 107, 092007 (2023) [arXiv:2302.08282 [hep-ex]]

    2023

  114. [122]

    Escribano and E

    R. Escribano and E. Royo, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1190 (2020) [arXiv:2007.12467 [hep-ph]], [Errata: Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 140 (2021), Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 743 (2022)]

    2020

  115. [123]

    Schäfer, M

    H. Schäfer, M. Zanke, Y . Korte, and B. Kubis, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074025 (2023) [arXiv:2307.10357 [hep-ph]]

    2023

  116. [124]

    Ambrosino et al

    F. Ambrosino et al. [KLOE, KLOE-2 Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 702, 324 (2011) [arXiv:1105.6067 [hep-ex]]

    2011 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII Collaboration] [arXiv:2605.04898 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv

  118. [126]

    Hayrapetyan et al

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. [CMS Collaboration] [arXiv:2605.00615 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv

  119. [127]

    Hayrapetyan et al

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 091903 (2023) [arXiv:2305.04904 [hep-ex]]

    2023

  120. [128]

    Kampf, J

    K. Kampf, J. Novotný, and P . Sánchez-Puertas, Phys. Rev. D 97, 056010 (2018) [arXiv:1801.06067 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Jarlskog and H

    C. Jarlskog and H. Pilkuhn, Nucl. Phys. B 1, 264 (1967)

    1967

  122. [130]

    Masjuan and P

    P . Masjuan and P . Sánchez-Puertas,JHEP 08, 108 (2016) [arXiv:1512.09292 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Messerli, M

    N. Messerli, M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, S. Holz, and B. Kubis, JHEP 04, 088 (2026) [arXiv:2512.13776 [hep-ph]]

    2026 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Guadagnoli, D

    D. Guadagnoli, D. Melikhov, and M. Reboud, Phys. Lett. B 760, 442 (2016) [arXiv:1605.05718 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Masjuan and P

    P . Masjuan and P . Sánchez-Puertas,Phys. Rev. D 95, 054026 (2017) [arXiv:1701.05829 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Eichmann, C

    G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, E. Weil, and R. Williams, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134855 (2019) [arXiv:1903.10844 [hep-ph]], [Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 799, 135029 (2019)]

    2019

  127. [135]

    Leutgeb, J

    J. Leutgeb, J. Mager, and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054021 (2023) [arXiv:2211.16562 [hep-ph]]. 30

    2023

  128. [136]

    E. J. Estrada, S. Gonzàlez-Solís, A. Guevara, and P . Roig,JHEP 12, 203 (2024) [arXiv:2409.10503 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  129. [137]

    S. Holz, M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 171902 (2025) [arXiv:2411.08098 [hep-ph]]

    2025

  130. [138]

    S. Holz, M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, JHEP 04, 147 (2025) [arXiv:2412.16281 [hep-ph]]

    2025

  131. [139]

    C. Q. Geng and J. N. Ng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2645 (1989)

    1989

  132. [140]

    Escribano, E

    R. Escribano, E. Royo, and P . Sánchez-Puertas, PoS CD2021, 024 (2024)

    2024

  133. [141]

    C. Abel, S. Afach, N. J. Ayres, and et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020) [arXiv:2001.11966]

    2020

  134. [142]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980)

    1980

  135. [143]

    V . P . Efrosinin, I. B. Khriplovich, G. G. Kirilin, and Y . G. Kudenko,Phys. Lett. B 493, 293 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0008199]

    2000 arXiv

  136. [144]

    I. I. Bigi and A. I. Sanda, CP Violation, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, 1999

    1999

  137. [145]

    Garisto and G

    R. Garisto and G. L. Kane, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2038 (1991)

  138. [146]

    Wu and J

    G.-H. Wu and J. N. Ng, Phys. Lett. B 392, 93 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9609314]

    1997 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Albaladejo et al

    M. Albaladejo et al. [JPAC Collaboration], Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103981 (2022) [arXiv:2112.13436 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  140. [148]

    R. Baur, J. Kambor, and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B 460, 127 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9510396]

    1996 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Ditsche, B

    C. Ditsche, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. C 60, 83 (2009) [arXiv:0812.0344 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Bijnens and K

    J. Bijnens and K. Ghorbani, JHEP 11, 030 (2007) [arXiv:0709.0230 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Kampf, M

    K. Kampf, M. Knecht, J. Novotny, and M. Zdrahal, Phys. Rev. D 84, 114015 (2011) [arXiv:1103.0982 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  144. [152]

    P . Guo, I. V . Danilkin, C. Fernández-Ramírez, V . Mathieu, and A. P . Szczepaniak,Phys. Lett. B 771, 497 (2017) [arXiv:1608.01447 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Colangelo, S

    G. Colangelo, S. Lanz, H. Leutwyler, and E. Passemar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 022001 (2017) [arXiv:1610.03494 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Albaladejo and B

    M. Albaladejo and B. Moussallam, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 508 (2017) [arXiv:1702.04931 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Colangelo, S

    G. Colangelo, S. Lanz, H. Leutwyler, and E. Passemar, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 947 (2018) [arXiv:1807.11937 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  148. [156]

    ’t Hooft, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 8 (1976)

    1976

  149. [157]

    Witten, Nucl

    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 156, 269 (1979)

    1979

  150. [158]

    V eneziano,Nucl

    G. V eneziano,Nucl. Phys. B 159, 213 (1979)

    1979

  151. [159]

    Kaiser and H

    R. Kaiser and H. Leutwyler, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 623 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0007101]

    2000 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Moskal, M

    P . Moskal, M. Wolke, A. Khoukaz, and W. Oelert, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 49, 1 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0208002]

    2002 arXiv

  153. [161]

    S. D. Bass and P . Moskal, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015003 (2019) [arXiv:1810.12290 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Donnachie and P

    A. Donnachie and P . V . Landshoff,Phys. Lett. B 296, 227 (1992) [arXiv:hep-ph/9209205]

    1992 arXiv

  155. [163]

    The PIP-II Conceptual Design Report,

    M. Ball et al., “The PIP-II Conceptual Design Report,” 2017. https://doi.org/10.2172/1346823

    2017 doi

  156. [164]

    D. D. Koetke, R. J. Fisk, D. S. Koetke, and T. Dombeck, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 378, 27 (1996)

    1996

  157. [165]

    Study of an alternative pion collector scheme for the ess neutrino super beam project.,

    P . Simion, “Study of an alternative pion collector scheme for the ess neutrino super beam project.,”

  158. [166]

    https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn: nbn:se:uu:diva-379699

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.