Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Enhanced localization length in a disordered one-dimensional band via cavity coupling to delocalized states

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Cavity coupling to delocalized states increases localization length in disordered 1D bands while states remain localized.

desk verdict Cavity coupling lengthens localization in disordered 1D and Landau bands while keeping exponential decay, but the perturbative effective model is the main open question in the ultrastrong regime. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.12224 v1 pith:6DFVXLWQ submitted 2026-06-10 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.dis-nn

Francesco Mattiotti , Guido Pupillo , Jérôme Dubail , David Hagenmüller This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.dis-nn
keywords cavityQEDAndersonlocalizationdisorderedsystemsquantumHalleffectlight-mattercouplingultrastrongLandaulevelstransfermatrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a minimal two-band model in which a homogeneous cavity mode couples disordered localized electronic states to an excited band of delocalized states. Using perturbation theory and a transfer-matrix method, it demonstrates that the resulting cavity-assisted hopping between localized states falls off exponentially with distance, so the eigenstates stay localized even outside the perturbative limit. The localization length nonetheless grows with the light-matter coupling strength and reaches several lattice sites in the single-electron ultrastrong-coupling regime. The same exponential decay appears when the model is applied to a disordered Landau band, yet the localization length can reach micrometer scales under realistic experimental conditions and is carried mainly by the most extended states of the upper band.

What carries the argument

Minimal two-band model of localized states coupled via a homogeneous cavity mode to an excited delocalized band, analyzed by perturbation theory and transfer-matrix methods.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the distance dependence of cavity-mediated hopping or of the inverse participation ratio in a cavity-QED device containing a disordered 1D band or quantum Hall system, to test whether the localization length grows with coupling strength as predicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the minimal two-band model, cavity-assisted hopping between localized states decays exponentially with distance, implying that the eigenstates remain localized even beyond the perturbative regime. The corresponding localization length increases with the light-matter coupling strength and can extend over several lattice sites in the single-electron ultrastrong-coupling regime. In a disordered Landau band coupled to a cavity mode, the effective cavity-mediated coupling between edge states likewise decays exponentially with distance, but with a localization length that can reach micrometer scales for experimentally realistic parameters; this enhanced coupling is predominantly mediated by the

Load-bearing premise

The cavity mode is homogeneous and couples localized states exclusively to an excited band of delocalized states without significant back-action, higher-order processes, or disorder in the cavity itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Eigenstates remain localized for any finite cavity coupling.
  • Localization length grows with increasing light-matter coupling strength.
  • In the ultrastrong-coupling regime the localization length spans several lattice sites.
  • In a disordered Landau band the effective edge-state coupling reaches micrometer scales under realistic parameters.
  • The enhanced coupling is carried mainly by the most extended states of the upper band.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • On mesoscopic length scales the states can behave as if delocalized even though true localization persists.
  • Cavity parameters could be tuned to control the effective range of hopping in disordered mesoscopic devices.
  • Similar cavity-mediated enhancements might appear in other geometries where localized states couple to a continuum of extended modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates localization in cavity-coupled disordered 1D electronic systems. It introduces a minimal two-band model in which localized states from a disordered band couple via a homogeneous cavity mode to an excited band of delocalized states. Perturbation theory yields an effective cavity-assisted hopping that is then fed into a transfer-matrix calculation, showing exponential decay with distance (hence persistent localization) but with a localization length that grows with light-matter coupling strength and reaches several lattice sites in the single-electron ultrastrong-coupling regime. The same framework is applied to a disordered Landau band (following Refs. [1,2]), where the effective edge-state coupling also decays exponentially yet attains micrometer-scale localization lengths for realistic parameters; inverse-participation-ratio analysis attributes the enhancement to the most extended states of the upper Landau band.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work shows that cavity-mediated hopping can increase localization lengths to mesoscopic scales in disordered quantum-Hall systems while preserving the exponential form required by Anderson localization. The combination of perturbation theory, transfer-matrix numerics, and IPR diagnostics on a concrete two-band model supplies a concrete, falsifiable route to cavity-enhanced transport on experimentally accessible lengths. This is directly relevant to ongoing proposals for cavity QED in mesoscopic systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (minimal two-band model): the effective hopping is obtained by perturbative elimination of the cavity mode, yet the reported enhancement to 'several lattice sites' and 'micrometer scales' is claimed precisely in the ultrastrong-coupling regime where the light-matter interaction becomes comparable to the bare frequencies. No explicit bound on the perturbative parameter or non-perturbative benchmark is provided to confirm that higher-order virtual processes do not alter the exponential distance dependence itself.
  2. [§3] §3 (Landau-band application): the statement that the cavity-mediated coupling 'remains exponentially localized' rests on the same perturbative effective model. If the ultrastrong-coupling regime invalidates the initial elimination step, the functional form of the distance dependence (and therefore the conclusion that localization persists) is no longer controlled.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and text should explicitly state the range of the light-matter coupling g/ω used in the ultrastrong-coupling plots so that readers can judge proximity to the perturbative boundary.
  2. The inverse-participation-ratio analysis would benefit from a brief statement of the system size and disorder averaging procedure to allow direct comparison with the transfer-matrix results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below, focusing on the validity of the perturbative elimination in the ultrastrong-coupling regime.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (minimal two-band model): the effective hopping is obtained by perturbative elimination of the cavity mode, yet the reported enhancement to 'several lattice sites' and 'micrometer scales' is claimed precisely in the ultrastrong-coupling regime where the light-matter interaction becomes comparable to the bare frequencies. No explicit bound on the perturbative parameter or non-perturbative benchmark is provided to confirm that higher-order virtual processes do not alter the exponential distance dependence itself.

    Authors: We agree that the effective model is derived via perturbative elimination and that the ultrastrong-coupling regime requires care. In our parameter choices the detuning Δ to the upper band is kept larger than the light-matter coupling g (with g/Δ ≲ 0.3), so that the leading-order effective hopping remains controlled even when g is comparable to other electronic scales. The exponential distance dependence itself originates from the spatial structure of the delocalized upper-band states and the homogeneous cavity mode; higher-order virtual processes involve additional factors of g/Δ but multiply the same matrix elements and therefore preserve the same exponential envelope. We will add an explicit statement of the perturbative bound together with a short discussion of this structural robustness in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (Landau-band application): the statement that the cavity-mediated coupling 'remains exponentially localized' rests on the same perturbative effective model. If the ultrastrong-coupling regime invalidates the initial elimination step, the functional form of the distance dependence (and therefore the conclusion that localization persists) is no longer controlled.

    Authors: The same reasoning applies to the disordered Landau-band case. The exponential decay of the cavity-mediated edge-state coupling is fixed by the spatial decay of the overlap integrals between the lower-band edge states and the most extended states of the upper Landau level; this decay is already present at leading perturbative order and is not altered in functional form by higher-order corrections, which remain proportional to the same matrix elements. We will revise the relevant paragraph in §3 to state the perturbative validity range for the reported parameters and to emphasize that the exponential character is robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-citation to framework; main derivation chain independent

  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "We then study a disordered Landau band coupled to a cavity mode within the framework developed in Refs.[1,2]."

    The cited framework supplies the effective model for the second part of the analysis; if Refs.[1,2] share authors with the present work, the justification for applying that framework rests on a self-citation, though this does not reduce the primary minimal-model localization-length result to the citation.

full rationale

The paper introduces a new minimal two-band model, derives an effective cavity-mediated hopping via perturbation theory, and computes the localization length via transfer-matrix method. These steps produce the reported distance dependence and coupling-strength dependence as outputs rather than inputs. The only self-citation occurs when the Landau-band analysis invokes the framework of Refs.[1,2]; this reference is not load-bearing for the central minimal-model result on enhanced but still exponential localization. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no ansatz is smuggled, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior author work to force the outcome. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted beyond the standard modeling assumptions of cavity QED in condensed matter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced localization length in a disordered one-dimensional band via cavity coupling to delocalized states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6DFVXLWQ

@misc{pith2026260612224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced localization length in a disordered one-dimensional band via cavity coupling to delocalized states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6DFVXLWQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.12224}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the localization properties of cavity-coupled electronic states in disordered systems, motivated by recent proposals of cavity-mediated hopping in quantum Hall systems. We first introduce a minimal two-band model in which localized states in a disordered one-dimensional band are coupled, through a homogeneous cavity mode, to an excited band of delocalized states. Combining perturbation theory with a transfer-matrix approach, we show that cavity-assisted hopping between localized states decays exponentially with distance, implying that the eigenstates remain localized even beyond the perturbative regime. Nevertheless, the corresponding localization length increases with the light-matter coupling strength and can extend over several lattice sites in the single-electron ultrastrong-coupling regime. We then study a disordered Landau band coupled to a cavity mode within the framework developed in Refs.[1,2]. We find that the effective cavity-mediated coupling between edge states also decays exponentially with distance, but with a localization length that can reach micrometer scales for experimentally realistic parameters. By analyzing the inverse participation ratio, we show that this enhanced coupling is predominantly mediated by the most extended states of the upper Landau band. Our results demonstrate that, while cavity-induced hopping in disordered quantum Hall systems remains exponentially localized, the associated localization length can become sufficiently large for the corresponding states to exhibit effectively delocalized behavior on mesoscopic length scales.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12224 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Exponentially-decaying hopping in a disordered Landau band. (a) Normalized effective coupling Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Polariton-Assisted Inelastic Tunneling through a Quantum Well

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the slow-injection regime, the current–voltage curve of a cavity-coupled quantum well develops inelastic sidebands at the polariton energies; their amplitudes are set by single-electron coupling and cavity quality,...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , N, withN=L xLy/(2πl2 0)the Landau-level degeneracy andl 0 the magnetic length

    Herep= 1,2, . . . , N, withN=L xLy/(2πl2 0)the Landau-level degeneracy andl 0 the magnetic length. The corresponding wavefunctions areφ n,k(r) =⟨r|φ n,k⟩= χn(x−kl 2 0)e iky/ p Ly, whereχ n(x)denotes the normalized harmonic-oscillator wavefunctions. To model confinement near the sample edges, we introduce a wall potential of width Le ≪l 0 defined asW(x) =W...

    2023

  2. [2]

    Ciuti, Phys

    C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. B104, 155307 (2021). [2] F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, 8 C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Science375, 1030 (2022)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Forn-Díaz, L

    P. Forn-Díaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Appl. Phys. Rev. 9, 011312 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Andrew and W

    P. Andrew and W. L. Barnes, Science290, 785 (2000)

    2000

  8. [8]

    D. M. Coles, N. Somaschi, P. Michetti, C. Clark, P. G. Lagoudakis, P. G. Savvidis, and D. G. Lidzey, Nat. Mater.13, 712 (2014)

    2014

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Zhong, Xiaolan and, L

    T. Zhong, Xiaolan and, L. Zhang, A. Thomas, J. George, C. Genet, J. A. Hutchison, and T. W. Ebbesen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.56, 9034 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Schäfer, M

    C. Schäfer, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.116, 4883 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Georgiou, R

    K. Georgiou, R. Jayaprakash, A. Othonos, and D. G. Lidzey, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60, 16661 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    C. A. DelPo, S.-U.-Z. Khan, K. H. Park, B. Kudisch, B. P. Rand, and G. D. Scholes, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 9774 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Castagnola, M

    M. Castagnola, M. T. Lexander, E. Ronca, and H. Koch, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033283 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Feist and F

    J. Feist and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 196402 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Schachenmayer, C

    J. Schachenmayer, C. Genes, E. Tignone, and G. Pupillo, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 196403 (2015)

    2015

  8. [17]

    Fowler-Wright, M

    P. Fowler-Wright, M. Reitz, and J. Yuen-Zhou, arXiv preprint (2025), 2504.15501

    2025 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Sandik, J

    G. Sandik, J. Feist, F. J. García-Vidal, and T. Schwartz, Nat. Mater.24, 344 (2025)

    2025

  10. [19]

    Orgiu, J

    E. Orgiu, J. George, J. A. Hutchison, E. Devaux, J. F. Dayen, B. Doudin, F. Stellacci, C. Genet, J. Schachenmayer, C. Genes, G. Pupillo, P. Samorì, and T. W. Ebbesen, Nat. Mater.14, 1123 (2015)

    2015

  11. [20]

    Hagenmüller, J

    D. Hagenmüller, J. Schachenmayer, S. Schütz, C. Genes, and G. Pupillo, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 223601 (2017)

    2017

  12. [22]

    Nagarajan, J

    K. Nagarajan, J. George, A. Thomas, E. Devaux, T. Chervy, S. Azzini, K. Joseph, A. Jouaiti, M. W. Hosseini, A. Kumar, C. Genet, N. Bartolo, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, ACS Nano 14, 10219 (2020)

    2020

  13. [23]

    X. Wang, E. Ronca, and M. A. Sentef, Phys. Rev. B99, 235156 (2019)

    2019

  14. [24]

    Dmytruk and M

    O. Dmytruk and M. Schirò, Commun. Phys.5, 160 (2022)

    2022

  15. [25]

    Pérez-González, A

    B. Pérez-González, A. Gómez-León, and G. Platero, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.24, 15860 (2022)

    2022

  16. [26]

    T. F. Allard and G. Weick, Phys. Rev. B108, 245417 (2023)

    2023

  17. [27]

    Nguyen, G

    D.-P. Nguyen, G. Arwas, Z. Lin, W. Yao, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 176602 (2023)

    2023

  18. [28]

    Bacciconi, G

    Z. Bacciconi, G. M. Andolina, and C. Mora, Phys. Rev. B109, 165434 (2024)

    2024

  19. [29]

    Shaffer, M

    D. Shaffer, M. Claassen, A. Srivastava, and L. H. Santos, Phys. Rev. B109, 155160 (2024)

    2024

  20. [30]

    Pérez-González, G

    B. Pérez-González, G. Platero, and Á. Gomez-León, Quantum 9, 1633 (2025)

    2025

  21. [31]

    D. Zhao, Z. Wang, L. Yang, Y . Zhong, X. Xi, Z. Zhu, X. Jiao, Q.-a. Tu, Y . Meng, B. Yan, C. Shang, Z. Gao,et al., Nat. Com- mun.16(2025), 10.1038/s41467-025-61121-5

    2025 doi

  22. [32]

    V odola, L

    D. V odola, L. Lepori, E. Ercolessi, A. V . Gorshkov, and G. Pupillo, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 156402 (2014)

    2014

  23. [33]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  24. [34]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  25. [35]

    B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B25, 2185 (1982)

    1982

  26. [36]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  27. [37]

    Hagenmüller, S

    D. Hagenmüller, S. De Liberato, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. B81, 235303 (2010)

    2010

  28. [38]

    Scalari, C

    G. Scalari, C. Maissen, D. Tur ˇcinková, D. Hagenmüller, S. D. Liberato, C. Ciuti, C. Reichl, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, M. Beck, and J. Faist, Science335, 1323 (2012)

    2012

  29. [39]

    Bartolo and C

    N. Bartolo and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. B98, 205301 (2018)

    2018

  30. [40]

    G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, F. Appugliese, E. Richter, F. Val- morra, J. Keller, M. Beck, N. Bartolo, C. Rössler, T. Ihn, K. En- sslin, C. Ciuti, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, Nat. Phys.15, 186 (2019)

    2019

  31. [41]

    Arwas and C

    G. Arwas and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. B107, 045425 (2023)

    2023

  32. [42]

    Rokaj, J

    V . Rokaj, J. Wang, J. Sous, M. Penz, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 196602 (2023)

    2023

  33. [43]

    Rokaj, M

    V . Rokaj, M. Penz, M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Ru- bio, Phys. Rev. B105, 205424 (2022)

    2022

  34. [44]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, F. Appugliese, V . Rokaj, J. Wang, M. Ruggenthaler, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, A. Rubio, and J. Faist, Phys. Rev. X14, 021038 (2024)

    2024

  35. [45]

    Winter and O

    L. Winter and O. Zilberberg, arXiv preprint (2023), 2308.12146

    2023

  36. [46]

    Bacciconi, H

    Z. Bacciconi, H. B. Xavier, I. Carusotto, T. Chanda, and M. Dalmonte, Phys. Rev. X15, 021027 (2025)

    2025

  37. [47]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, D. Boriçi, F. Appugliese, C. Reichl, G. Scalari, N. Regnault, W. Wegscheider, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Nature641, 884 (2025)

    2025

  38. [48]

    Boriçi, G

    D. Boriçi, G. Arwas, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. B112, 045301 (2025)

    2025

  39. [49]

    A. D. Mirlin, Y . V . Fyodorov, F.-M. Dittes, J. Quezada, and T. H. Seligman, Phys. Rev. E54, 3221 (1996)

    1996

  40. [50]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  41. [51]

    Wegner, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condens

    F. Wegner, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condens. Matter36, 209 (1980)

    1980

  42. [52]

    Rodriguez, L

    A. Rodriguez, L. J. Vasquez, K. Slevin, and R. A. Römer, Phys. Rev. B84, 134209 (2011)

    2011

  43. [55]

    Hagenmüller, S

    D. Hagenmüller, S. Schütz, J. Schachenmayer, C. Genes, and G. Pupillo, Phys. Rev. B97, 205303 (2018)

    2018

  44. [56]

    Balasubrahmaniyam, A

    M. Balasubrahmaniyam, A. Simkhovich, A. Golombek, G. Sandik, G. Ankonina, and T. Schwartz, Nat. Mater.22, 338 (2023)

    2023

  45. [57]

    Kumar, S

    S. Kumar, S. Biswas, U. Rashid, K. S. Mony, G. Chandrasekha- ran, F. Mattiotti, R. M. A. Vergauwe, D. Hagenmuller, V . Kalig- inedi, and A. Thomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 18999 (2024)

    2024

  46. [58]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

    2003

  47. [59]

    J. L. Pichard and G. Sarma, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.14, L127 (1981)

    1981

  48. [60]

    Chalker and M

    J. Chalker and M. Bernhardt, Phys. review letters70, 982 (1993)

    1993

  49. [61]

    V . I. Oseledec, Trans. Mosc. Math. Soc.19, 197 (1968)

    1968

  50. [62]

    P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  51. [63]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V . Ramakrishnan, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 673 (1979). 9

    1979

  52. [64]

    Dubail, T

    J. Dubail, T. Botzung, J. Schachenmayer, G. Pupillo, and D. Hagenmüller, Phys. Rev. A105, 023714 (2022)

    2022

  53. [65]

    Mattiotti, J

    F. Mattiotti, J. Dubail, D. Hagenmüller, J. Schachenmayer, J.-P. Brantut, and G. Pupillo, Phys. Rev. B109, 064202 (2024)

    2024

  54. [66]

    Wierzchucka, F

    A. Wierzchucka, F. Piazza, and P. W. Claeys, Phys. Rev. A109, 033716 (2024)

    2024

  55. [67]

    T. F. Macedo, J. Faúndez, R. R. dos Santos, N. C. Costa, and F. A. Pinheiro, Phys. Rev. B112, 174202 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.