pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12468 · v1 · pith:LDC5HMOHnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · nucl-ex

Experimental updates on development of accelerator-driven ion source at TRIUMF to benchmark Ba-tagging techniques for future neutrinoless double beta decay searches

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 10:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det nucl-ex
keywords ion sourceliquid xenonbarium taggingdouble beta decaygamma spectroscopyelectrostatic collectionneutrinoless double beta decay
0
0 comments X

The pith

An accelerator-driven ion source is being developed to inject radioactive ions into liquid xenon for benchmarking barium tagging techniques.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper provides an experimental status update on the commissioning of an accelerator-driven ion source designed to deliver radioactive ions into a liquid xenon volume. The ions are stopped in the xenon, collected using electrostatic methods, and detected through gamma spectroscopy. This source is meant to test and optimize techniques for identifying the daughter nucleus from double beta decay events, which could help separate signal from background in large-scale xenon detectors. If realized, it would enable systematic studies needed to improve background rejection in searches for neutrinoless double beta decay.

Core claim

An accelerator-driven ion source is currently being developed where radioactive ions will be injected into and stopped in a liquid xenon volume, collected electrostatically and detected using gamma spectroscopy, to serve as a testbed for barium tagging techniques.

What carries the argument

The accelerator-driven ion source that stops radioactive ions in liquid xenon for electrostatic collection and gamma-ray detection.

If this is right

  • Allows testing of various extraction and identification methods for the daughter nucleus.
  • Provides a way to quantify the efficiency of barium tagging.
  • Supports efforts to increase sensitivity in searches for neutrinoless double beta decay.
  • Facilitates comparison of different tagging approaches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such a source could be used to develop tagging methods applicable to other rare decay searches.
  • Successful operation might lead to integration with larger detector systems for real-time background rejection.
  • The electrostatic collection method could be adapted for other ion species in noble liquid detectors.

Load-bearing premise

The ion source can be successfully commissioned to produce and detect barium ions in liquid xenon in sufficient quantities for meaningful tests of tagging techniques.

What would settle it

A failure to observe gamma rays from the collected ions after multiple injection attempts, indicating insufficient delivery or collection efficiency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12468 by A.A. Kwiatkowski, A. Lennarz, A.V. Balbuena, D. Ray, M. Marquis, T. Brunner, T. Daniels.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Piping diagram of the gas handling system, with the deployment required for phase 1 with Ar gas shown in the region highlighted by the red dotted lines. 3. Recent developments 3.1. Gas deployment system Due to the cost associated with procuring the required quantity of Xe, a closed gas handling system (GHS) is being developed for deploying and recovering GXe with minimal to no loss. A schematic figure of t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Set up at UNCW for cryogenic tests of the Be window. pressurized air. A Python based control system was de￾veloped to operate the system of valves, running checks at every point to prevent any backflow or overpressure. The system will be tested again with GAr offline, before it is attached to the apparatus for phase 1 of the experiment. 3.2. Be Window A 25 µm thick beam-entrance Be window will be used to c… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neutrinoless double beta decay ($0\nu\beta\beta$) could provide a way to probe physics beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. The proposed nEXO experiment aims to search for $0\nu\beta\beta$ in $^{136}$Xe using a tonne-scale liquid xenon (LXe) time projection chamber. The projected half-life sensitivity for nEXO for 10 years of livetime is $>$10$^{28}$ years. Efforts are ongoing to further suppress backgrounds and increase the experiment's sensitivity. One approach pursued is Ba-tagging, which entails extracting and identifying the daughter nuclide from the $\beta\beta$-decay of $^{136}$Xe, $^{136}$Ba. Once successful, this technique has the potential to separate background events from true $\beta\beta$ events. While different extraction and identification methods are being investigated by different groups, a Ba-ion source is required for testing, quantifying and optimizing them. An accelerator-driven ion source is currently being developed at TRIUMF, where radioactive ions will be be injected into and stopped in an LXe volume, collected electrostatically and detected using $\gamma$ spectroscopy. In this contribution, an experimental status update on the commissioning of this Ba-ion source at TRIUMF is provided.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a status report on the ongoing development of an accelerator-driven ion source at TRIUMF. Radioactive ions are to be injected into and stopped in a liquid xenon volume, collected electrostatically, and detected via γ spectroscopy in order to benchmark Ba-tagging techniques for background suppression in the proposed nEXO 0νββ experiment.

Significance. A working Ba-ion source of this type would enable controlled, quantitative tests of extraction and identification methods for the 136Ba daughter nucleus. This capability is directly relevant to improving the projected sensitivity of tonne-scale LXe detectors beyond the >10^28 yr half-life goal stated for nEXO.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'an experimental status update on the commissioning of this Ba-ion source at TRIUMF is provided,' yet the manuscript contains no description of the ion source design, beam parameters, stopping efficiency in LXe, collection method, or any commissioning data. Without these elements the central claim cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Typographical error: 'will be be injected' should read 'will be injected'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the review and for highlighting the mismatch between the abstract's phrasing and the manuscript's actual content. We agree that the current abstract overstates what is delivered in this short status report and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that 'an experimental status update on the commissioning of this Ba-ion source at TRIUMF is provided,' yet the manuscript contains no description of the ion source design, beam parameters, stopping efficiency in LXe, collection method, or any commissioning data. Without these elements the central claim cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's wording implies more detailed experimental results (design, beam parameters, efficiencies, and data) than the manuscript actually contains. This short contribution is a high-level project overview rather than a technical report on commissioning, as the work remains in an early development phase. We will revise the abstract to: 'In this contribution, we provide an update on the development and initial commissioning plans for an accelerator-driven Ba-ion source at TRIUMF.' Full technical details will appear in subsequent publications once quantitative results become available. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; pure experimental status report

full rationale

The paper contains no derivations, equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or load-bearing self-citations. Its content is limited to a descriptive status update on commissioning an ion source, with no quantitative claims or chains that reduce to inputs by construction. This matches the default expectation of no circularity for non-derivational experimental reports.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical model, free parameters, or invented entities are described; the paper is an instrumentation status report.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5793 in / 971 out tokens · 21620 ms · 2026-06-27T10:37:16.666037+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Buchmüller, P

    W. Buchmüller, P. Di Bari, M. Plümacher, Lepto- genesis for pedestrians, Ann. Phys. 315 (2) (2005) 3 305–351.doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.02.003. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S000349160400137X

  2. [2]

    M. J. Dolinski, A. W. Poon, W. Rodejohann, Neu- trinoless double-beta decay: Status and prospects, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (1) (2019) 219–251. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023407

  3. [3]

    Majorana, Teoria simmetrica dell’elettrone e del positrone, Il Nuovo Cim

    E. Majorana, Teoria simmetrica dell’elettrone e del positrone, Il Nuovo Cim. (1924-1942) 14 (4) (1937) 171–184.doi:10.1007/BF02961314. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961314

  4. [4]

    Engel, J

    J. Engel, J. Menéndez, Status and future of nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics 80 (4) (2017) 046301.doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5bc5. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ aa5bc5

  5. [5]

    S. A. Kharusi, A. Alamre, J. B. Albert, et al., nEXO Pre-Conceptual Design Report, arXiv 1805.11142 (2018).doi:10.48550/arXiv.1805.11142

  6. [6]

    Auger, D

    M. Auger, D. J. Auty, P. S. Barbeau, et al., The EXO-200 detector, part i: detector design and con- struction, J. Instrum. 7 (05) (2012) P05010.doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/7/05/P05010. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/7/ 05/P05010

  7. [7]

    Ackerman, J

    N. Ackerman, J. Albert, M. Auger, et al., The EXO-200 detector, part ii: auxiliary systems, J. Instrum. 17 (02) (2022) P02015. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/02/P02015. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/ 17/02/P02015

  8. [8]

    N.Ackerman, B.Aharmim, M.Auger, etal., Observa- tion of two-neutrino double-beta decay in136Xewith the EXO-200 detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 212501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.212501. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.212501

  9. [9]

    Anton, I

    G. Anton, I. Badhrees, P. S. Barbeau, et al., Search for Neutrinoless Double-βDecay with the Com- plete EXO-200 Dataset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 161802.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.161802

  10. [10]

    Adhikari, S

    G. Adhikari, S. A. Kharusi, E. Angelico, et al., nEXO: Neutrinoless double beta decay search beyond10 28 year half-life sensitivity, J. Phys. G 49 (2021) 015104. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac3631

  11. [11]

    J. B. Albert, G. Anton, I. J. Arnquist, et al., Sensitiv- ity and Discovery Potential of nEXO to Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2018) 065503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.065503

  12. [12]

    M. K. Moe, Detection of neutrinoless double- beta decay, Phys. Rev. C 44 (1991) R931–R934. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.44.R931. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.44.R931

  13. [13]

    D. Ray, R. Collister, H. Rasiwala, et al., Ion Ma- nipulation from Liquid Xe to Vacuum: Ba-Tagging for a nEXO Upgrade and Future0νββExperiments, Atoms 12 (12) (2024).doi:10.3390/atoms12120071. URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2218-2004/12/12/71

  14. [14]

    Green, J

    M. Green, J. Wodin, R. DeVoe, et al., Observation of single collisionally cooled trapped ions in a buffer gas, Phys. Rev. A 76 (2) (2007) 023404.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevA.76.023404

  15. [15]

    B. Mong, S. Cook, T. Walton, et al., Spectroscopy of Ba and Ba+ deposits in solid xenon for barium tagging in nexo, Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 022505. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022505. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.91.022505

  16. [16]

    nEXO Collaboration, Imaging individual barium atoms in solid xenon for barium tagging in nEXO, Nature 569 (7755) (2019) 203–207.doi:10.1038/ s41586-019-1169-4

  17. [17]

    Yvaine, D

    M. Yvaine, D. Fairbank, J. Soderstrom, et al., Overcoming photobleaching in imag- ing of single barium atoms in a solid xenon matrix, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 043193. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043193. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.6.043193

  18. [18]

    Rasiwala, K

    H. Rasiwala, K. Murray, Y. Lan, et al., ‘Searching for a needle in a haystack;’ A Ba-tagging ap- proach for an upgraded nEXO experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 541 (2023) 298–300. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2023.05.047. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0168583X2300246X

  19. [19]

    A. D. McDonald, B. J. P. Jones, D. R. Nygren, et al., Demonstration of Single Barium Ion Sensi- tivity for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay using Sin- gle Molecule Fluorescence Imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (13) (2018) 132504.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 120.132504

  20. [20]

    Aalbers, S

    J. Aalbers, S. S. AbdusSalam, K. Abe, et al., A next-generation liquid xenon observatory for dark matter and neutrino physics, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 50 (1) (2022) 013001. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac841a. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ ac841a 4

  21. [21]

    Aalbers, K

    J. Aalbers, K. Abe, M. Adrover, et al., Neutri- noless double beta decay sensitivity of the XLZD rare event observatory, Journal of Physics G: Nu- clear and Particle Physics 52 (4) (2025) 045102. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/adb900. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ adb900

  22. [22]

    Byrnes, F

    N. Byrnes, F. W. Foss, B. J. P. Jones, et al., Progress toward barium tagging in high pressure xenon gas with single molecule fluorescence imaging, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1312 (1) (2019) 012001.doi:10.1088/ 1742-6596/1312/1/012001

  23. [23]

    Kondev, M

    F. Kondev, M. Wang, W. Huang, et al., The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties, Chin. Phys. C 45 (3) (2021) 030001. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ abddae

  24. [24]

    G. C. Ball, G. Hackman, R. Krücken, The TRIUMF- ISAC facility: two decades of discovery with rare isotope beams, Phys. Scr. 91 (9) (2016) 093002. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/91/9/093002. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/ 91/9/093002 5